One-stage transanal endorectal pull-through for treatment of Hirschsprung’s disease: Impact of additional abdominal approach

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huu Thien Ho
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Group ◽  
Open Group ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Abdominal Approach ◽  
Average Operative Time ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Disease Impact ◽  
Pull Through ◽  
The Impact

Background: The transanal one-stage endorectal pull-through (TOSEPT) procedure sometimes requires assistance by an abdominal approach to complete the operation. This study aims to rectify this by evaluating the impact of an assisted abdominal approach in the outcomes of the TOSEPT in children with HD. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at surgical pediatric department of Hue central hospital. All consecutive medial records of patients operated on for HD in our department between June 2010 and June 2018 were retrieved and analysed. Results: 66/446 (14.79%) patients with HD who required TOSEPT with an additional abdominal approach to complete the operation for inclusion in this retrospective study.Length of the resected colon: 13.30 ± 3.45 cm (open group) and 19.70 ± 4.50 cm (laparoscopic group). Average operative time: 156 ± 12 minutes (open group) and 170 ± 14 minutes (laparoscopic group). No deaths or intra-operative complications were recorded in this study. No postoperative complicationoccuredin the laparoscopic group. Grade II complication based on Dindo-Clavien classification occurred in 14 (21.21%) of the open group and one (1.51%) grade III complication. The length of hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopic group at 5 ± 1.5 days compared to 7 ± 2.5 daysfor the open group. All of the complications were grade I or II, mainly enterocolitis at3-monthfollow-up. Conclusion: Additional abdominal approach impacts on post-operative results of TOSEPT procedure for HD but not on outcome of disease. Laparoscopic surgery as the additional abdominal approach should be used to reduce the complications

scholarly journals Impact of additional abdominal approach to transanal one stage endorectal pull-through in treatment of Hirschsprung’s disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. 2712
Author(s):  
Ho Huu Thien ◽  
Cao Xuan Thanh ◽  
Nguyen Thanh Xuan ◽  
Nguyen Huu Son
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Group ◽  
Open Group ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Abdominal Approach ◽  
Paediatric Department ◽  
Average Operative Time ◽  
Pull Through ◽  
The Impact

Background: The transanal one-stage endorectal pull-through (TOSEPT) procedure sometimes requires assistance by an abdominal approach to complete the operation. This study aims to rectify this by evaluating the impact of an assisted abdominal approach in the outcomes of the TOSEPT in children with HD.Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at surgical paediatric department of Hue central hospital. All consecutive medical records of patients operated on for HD in our department between June 2010 and June 2018 were retrieved and analysed.Results: 66/446 (14.79%) patients with HD who required TOSEPT with an additional abdominal approach to complete the operation for inclusion in this retrospective study. Length of the resected colon: 13.30±3.45 cm (open group) and 19.70±4.50 cm (laparoscopic group). Average operative time: 156±12 minutes (open group) and 170±14 minutes (laparoscopic group). No deaths or intra-operative complications were recorded in this study. No postoperative complication occured in the laparoscopic group. Grade II complication based on Dindo-Clavien classification occurred in 14 (21.21%) of the open group and one (1.51%) grade III complication. The length of hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopic group at 5±1.5 days compared to 7±2.5 days for the open group. All of the complications were grade I or II, mainly enterocolitis at 3-month follow-up.Conclusions: Additional abdominal approach impacts on post-operative results of TOSEPT procedure for HD but not on outcome of disease. Laparoscopic surgery as the additional abdominal approach should be used to reduce the complications. 

POST OPERATIVE PAIN –VAS SCORE, ANALGESIA REQUIREMENT, LENGTH OF HOSPITAL STAY AND FOLLOW UP IN OPEN AND LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY.

2021 ◽  
pp. 65-66
Author(s):  
Nadeem Rashid ◽  
Sadaf Ali
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Group ◽  
Laparoscopic Nephrectomy ◽  
Open Group ◽  
Research Centre ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Open Nephrectomy

This was a prospective study conducted in order to evaluate and compare pain scores through visual analogue scale, length of hospital stay and follow up in patients of benign renal disease and early renal malignancy. This study was conducted in the Department of Surgery, Batra Hospital and Medical Research centre, New Delhi. For the purpose of this study, a total number of 80 patients participated willingly after giving written informed consent. Out of these 40 were operated through open route and 40 patients underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy. Patients were grouped based on their route of surgery into open and laparoscopic groups. The comparison between them was made in relation to need for analgesia, hospital stay and convalescence. Follow up was done at 1 week, 4 weeks, 3 months and every six months so as to look for any delayed complications, chronic pain and recurrence in case of malignant disease. Female patients in the reproductive age group were more common in patients operated by laparoscopic route while as males were more common in open nephrectomy group. Laparoscopic group had lesser pain scores but on statistical analysis there were no signicant differences between the two groups. Mean hospital stay was (6.3 ±1.34) days in open group while as (4.2 ±1.22) days in the laparoscopic group. This study demonstrated that acute post operative pain scores were not different statistically between the two groups. Mean length of hospital stay was more in open group as compared to laparoscopic group. The cost of surgery was more in the laparoscopic group in comparison to open nephrectomy group. However, due to brief hospital stay, lesser morbidity, shorter convalescence and overall costs laparoscopic method was more useful in comparison with open route nephrectomy.

The impact of exogenous nitric oxide during cardiopulmonary bypass for cardiac surgery

Perfusion ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 026765912110148
Author(s):  
Joseph Mc Loughlin ◽  
Lorraine Browne ◽  
John Hinchion
Keyword(s):  
Nitric Oxide ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Bypass ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
High Quality Research ◽  
Low Cardiac Output Syndrome ◽  
The Impact

Objectives: Cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass frequently provokes a systemic inflammatory response syndrome. This can lead to the development of low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS). Both of these can affect morbidity and mortality. This study is a systematic review of the impact of gaseous nitric oxide (gNO), delivered via the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit during cardiac surgery, on post-operative outcomes. It aims to summarise the evidence available, to assess the effectiveness of gNO via the CPB circuit on outcomes, and highlight areas of further research needed to develop this hypothesis. Methods: A comprehensive search of Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library was performed in May 2020. Only randomised control trials (RCTs) were considered. Results: Three studies were identified with a total of 274 patients. There was variation in the outcomes measures used across the studies. These studies demonstrate there is evidence that this intervention may contribute towards cardioprotection. Significant reductions in cardiac troponin I (cTnI) levels and lower vasoactive inotrope scores were seen in intervention groups. A high degree of heterogeneity between the studies exists. Meta-analysis of the duration of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay and length of hospital stay showed no significant differences. Conclusion: This systematic review explored the findings of three pilot RCTs. Overall the hypothesis that NO delivered via the CPB circuit can provide cardioprotection has been supported by this study. There remains a significant gap in the evidence, further high-quality research is required in both the adult and paediatric populations.

scholarly journals Antimicrobial Use in COVID-19 Patients in the First Phase of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: A Scoping Review

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 745
Author(s):  
Wenjuan Cong ◽  
Ak Narayan Poudel ◽  
Nour Alhusein ◽  
Hexing Wang ◽  
Guiqing Yao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critical Illness ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Clinical Evidence ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Severity Of Illness ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Clinical Scenarios ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
The Impact

This scoping review provides new evidence on the prevalence and patterns of global antimicrobial use in the treatment of COVID-19 patients; identifies the most commonly used antibiotics and clinical scenarios associated with antibiotic prescribing in the first phase of the pandemic; and explores the impact of documented antibiotic prescribing on treatment outcomes in COVID-19 patients. The review complies with PRISMA guidelines for Scoping Reviews and the protocol is registered with the Open Science Framework. In the first six months of the pandemic, there was a similar mean antibiotic prescribing rate between patients with severe or critical illness (75.4%) and patients with mild or moderate illness (75.1%). The proportion of patients prescribed antibiotics without clinical justification was 51.5% vs. 41.9% for patients with mild or moderate illness and those with severe or critical illness. Comparison of patients who were provided antibiotics with a clinical justification with those who were given antibiotics without clinical justification showed lower mortality rates (9.5% vs. 13.1%), higher discharge rates (80.9% vs. 69.3%), and shorter length of hospital stay (9.3 days vs. 12.2 days). In the first 6 months of the pandemic, antibiotics were prescribed for COVID-19 patients regardless of severity of illness. A large proportion of antibiotic prescribing for mild and moderate COVID-19 patients did not have clinical evidence of a bacterial co-infection. Antibiotics may not be beneficial to COVID-19 patients without clinical evidence of a bacterial co-infection.

565 POST-OPERATIVE WEIGHT LOSS AND OUTCOMES FOLLOWING ESOPHAGECTOMY

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Khaw ◽  
S Munro ◽  
J Sturrock ◽  
H Jaretzke ◽  
S Kamarajah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Failure To Thrive ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Postoperative Weight Loss ◽  
Poor Outcomes ◽  
The Impact

Abstract   Oesophageal cancer is the 11th most common cancer worldwide, with oesophagectomy remaining the mainstay curative treatment, despite significant associated morbidity and mortality. Postoperative weight loss remains a significant problem and is directly correlated to poor prognosis. Measures such as the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programme and intraoperative jejunostomy feed have looked to tackle this. This study investigates the impact of these on mortality, length of hospital stay and postoperative weight loss. Methods Patients undergoing oesophagectomy between January 1st 2012—December 2014 and 28th October 2015–December 31st 2019 in a national tertiary oesophagogastric unit were included retrospectively. Variables measured included comorbidities, operation, histopathology, weights (pre- and post-operatively), length of hospital stay, postoperative complications and mortality. Pre-operative body weight was measured at elective admission, and further weights were identified from a prospectively maintained database, during further clinic appointments. Other data was collected through patient notes. Results 594 patients were included. Mean age at diagnosis was 65.9 years (13–65). Majority of cases were adenocarcinoma (63.3%), with varying stages of disease (TX-4, NX-3). Benign pathology accounted for 8.75% of cases. Mean weight loss post-oesophagectomy exceeded 10% at 6 months (SD 14.49). Majority (60.1%) of patients were discharged with feeding jejunostomy, and 5.22% of these required this feed to be restarted post-discharge. Length of stay was mean 16.5 days (SD 22.3). Complications occurred in 68.9% of patients, of which 13.8% were infection driven. Mortality occurred in 26.6% of patients, with 1.83% during hospital admission. 30-day mortality rate was 1.39%. Conclusion Failure to thrive and prolonged weight-loss following oesophagectomy can contribute to poor recovery, with associated complications and poor outcomes, including increased length of stay and mortality. Further analysis of data to investigate association between weight loss and poor outcomes for oesophagectomy patients will allow for personalised treatment of high-risk patients, in conjunction with members of the multidisciplinary team, including dieticians.

scholarly journals Management of superficial and deep surgical site infection: an international multidisciplinary consensus

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriele Sganga ◽  
Mohamed Baguneid ◽  
Pascal Dohmen ◽  
Evangelos J. Giamarellos-Bourboulis ◽  
Emilio Romanini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Early Discharge ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Steering Committee ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Hospital Stays ◽  
New Treatment ◽  
The Impact

AbstractSurgical site infections represent a considerable burden for healthcare systems. To obtain a consensus on the impact and future clinical and economic needs regarding SSI management in an era of multidrug resistance. A modified Delphi method was used to obtain consensus among experts from five European countries. The Delphi questionnaire was assembled by a steering committee, verified by a panel of experts and administered to 90 experts in 8 different surgical specialities (Abdominal, Cancer, Cardiac, General surgery, Orthopaedic, Thoracic, Transplant and Vascular and three other specialities (infectious disease, internal medicine microbiology). Respondents (n = 52) reached consensus on 62/73 items including that resistant pathogens are an increasing matter of concern and increase both treatment complexity and the length of hospital stay. There was strong positive consensus on the cost-effectiveness of early discharge (ED) programs, improvement of quality of life with ED and association between increased length of stay and economic burden to the hospital. However, established ED protocols were not widely available in their hospitals. Respondents expressed a positive consensus on the usefulness of antibiotics that allow ED. Surgeons are aware of their responsibility in an interdisciplinary team for the treatment of SSI, and of the impact of multidrug-resistant bacteria in the context of SSI. Reducing the length of hospital stays by applying ED protocols and implementing new treatment alternatives is crucial to reduce harm to patients and costs for the hospital.

scholarly journals What is the impact of multimorbidity on the risk of hospitalisation in older adults? A systematic review study protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e049974
Author(s):  
Luciana Pereira Rodrigues ◽  
Andréa Toledo de Oliveira Rezende ◽  
Letícia de Almeida Nogueira e Moura ◽  
Bruno Pereira Nunes ◽  
Matias Noll ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Study Protocol ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Review Study ◽  
The Impact

IntroductionThe development of multiple coexisting chronic diseases (multimorbidity) is increasing globally, along with the percentage of older adults affected by it. Multimorbidity is associated with the concomitant use of multiple medications, a greater possibility of adverse effects, and increased risk of hospitalisation. Therefore, this systematic review study protocol aims to analyse the impact of multimorbidity on the occurrence of hospitalisation in older adults and assess whether this impact changes according to factors such as sex, age, institutionalisation and socioeconomic status. This study will also review the average length of hospital stay and the occurrence of hospital readmission.Methods and analysisA systematic review of the literature will be carried out using the PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases. The inclusion criteria will incorporate cross-sectional, cohort and case–control studies that analysed the association between multimorbidity (defined as the presence of ≥2 and/or ≥3 chronic conditions and complex multimorbidity) and hospitalisation (yes/no, days of hospitalisation and number of readmissions) in older adults (aged ≥60 years or >65 years). Effect measures will be quantified, including ORs, prevalence ratios, HRs and relative risk, along with their associated 95% CI. The overall aim of this study is to widen knowledge and to raise reflections about the association between multimorbidity and hospitalisation in older adults. Ultimately, its findings may contribute to improvements in public health policies resulting in cost reductions across healthcare systems.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required. The results will be disseminated via submission for publication to a peer-reviewed journal when complete.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021229328.

scholarly journals Increased Construct Stiffness With Meniscal Repair Sutures and Devices Increases the Risk of Cheese-Wiring During Biomechanical Load-to-Failure Testing

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 232596712110156
Author(s):  
Sebastian Müller ◽  
Tanja Schwenk ◽  
Michael de Wild ◽  
Dimitris Dimitriou ◽  
Claudio Rosso
Keyword(s):  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Meniscal Repair ◽  
Suture Fixation ◽  
Contributing Factors ◽  
Mode Of Failure ◽  
Load To Failure ◽  
Pull Through ◽  
Optimal Stiffness ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Inside Out

Background: Cheese-wiring, the suture that cuts through the meniscus, is a well-known issue in meniscal repair. So far, contributing factors are neither fully understood nor sufficiently studied. Hypothesis/Purpose: To investigate whether the construct stiffness of repair sutures and devices correlates with suture cut-through (cheese-wiring) during load-to-failure testing. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: In 131 porcine menisci, longitudinal bucket-handle tears were repaired using either inside-out sutures (n = 66; No. 0 Ultrabraid, 2-0 Orthocord, 2-0 FiberWire, and 2-0 Ethibond) or all-inside devices (n = 65; FastFix360, Omnispan, and Meniscal Cinch). After cyclic loading, load-to-failure testing was performed. The mode of failure and construct stiffness were recorded. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to define the optimal stiffness threshold for predicting meniscal repair failure by cheese-wiring. The 2-tailed t test and analysis of variance were used to test significance. Results: Loss of suture fixation was the most common mode of failure in all specimens (58%), except for the Omnispan, which failed most commonly because of anchor pull-through. The Omnispan demonstrated the highest construct stiffness (30.8 ± 3.5 N/mm), whereas the Meniscal Cinch (18.0 ± 8.8 N/mm) and Ethibond (19.4 ± 7.8 N/mm) demonstrated the lowest construct stiffness. The Omnispan showed significantly higher stiffness compared with the Meniscal Cinch ( P < .001) and Ethibond ( P = .02), whereas the stiffness of the Meniscal Cinch was significantly lower compared with that of the FiberWire ( P = .01), Ultrabraid ( P = .04), and FastFix360 ( P = .03). While meniscal repair with a high construct stiffness more often failed by cheese-wiring, meniscal repair with a lower stiffness failed by loss of suture fixation, knot slippage, or anchor pull-through. Meniscal repair with a stiffness >26.5 N/mm had a 3.6 times higher risk of failure due to cheese-wiring during load-to-failure testing (95% CI, 1.4-8.2; P < .0001). Conclusion: Meniscal repair using inside-out sutures and all-inside devices with a higher construct stiffness (>26.5 N/mm) was more likely to fail through suture cut-through (cheese-wiring) than that with a lower stiffness (≤26.5 N/mm). Clinical Relevance: This is the first study investigating the impact of construct stiffness on meniscal repair failure by suture cut-through (cheese-wiring).

scholarly journals A Novel Technique of Ultra-Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Introduction and an Initial Experience for Treatment of Upper Urinary Calculi Less Than 2 cm

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janak Desai ◽  
Guohua Zeng ◽  
Zhijian Zhao ◽  
Wen Zhong ◽  
Wenzhong Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Urinary Calculi ◽  
Renal Stones ◽  
Laser Lithotripsy ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Modified Technique ◽  
Average Operative Time ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Metal Sheath

Objectives. To describe our novel modified technique of ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMP) using of a novel 6 Fr mininephroscope through an 11–13 Fr metal sheath to perform holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy.Methods. The medical records of 36 patients with moderate-sized (<20 mm) kidney stones treated with UMP from April to July 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were assessed at the 1st day and 1st month postoperatively by KUB and US to assess stone-free status.Results. The mean stone size was 14.9 ± 4.1 mm (rang: 6–20). The average operative time was 59.8 ± 15.9 (30–90) min. The stone-free rate at postoperative 1st day and 1st month was 88.9% and 97.2%. The mean hospital stay was 3.0 ± 0.9 (2–5) days. Complications were noted in 6 (16.7%) cases according to the Clavien classification, including sepsis in 2 (5.6%) cases (grade II), urinary extravasations in 1 (2.8%) case (grade IIIa), and fever in 3 (8.3%) cases (grade II). No patients needed blood transfusion.Conclusions. UMP is technically feasible, safe, and efficacious for moderate-sized renal stones with an advantage of high stone-free rates and low complication rates. However, due to the limits of its current unexplored indications, UMP is therefore a supplement to, not a substitute for, the standard mini-PCNL technology.

scholarly journals Age- and Sex-Specific In-Hospital Mortality after Myocardial Infarction in Routine Clinical Practice

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chizobam Ani ◽  
Deyu Pan ◽  
David Martins ◽  
Bruce Ovbiagele
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Mortality Trends ◽  
Male Mortality ◽  
Co Morbidity ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Age And Sex

Background. Literature regarding the influence of age/sex on mortality trends for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) hospitalizations is limited to hospitals participating in voluntary AMI registries.Objective. Evaluate the impact of age and sex on in-hospital AMI mortality using a nationally representative hospital sample.Methods. Secondary data analysis using AMI hospitalizations identified from the Nationwide-Inpatient-Sample (NIS). Descriptive and Cox proportional hazards analysis explored mortality trends by age and sex from 1997–2006 while adjusting for the influence of, demographics, co-morbidity, length of hospital stay and hospital characteristics.Results. From 1997–2006, in-hospital AMI mortality rates decreased across time in all subgroups (), except for males aged <55 years. The greatest decline was observed in females aged <55 years, compared to similarly aged males, mortality outcomes were poorer in 1997-1998 (RR 1.47, 95% CI  =  1.30–1.66), when compared with 2005-2006 (RR 1.03, 95% CI  =  0.90–1.18), adjusted value for trend demonstrated a statistically significant decline in the relative AMI mortality risk for females when compared with males (<0.001).Conclusion. Over the last decade, in-hospital AMI mortality rates declined for every age/sex group except males <55 years. While AMI female-male mortality disparity has narrowed, some room for improvement remains.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document