Research on Supervision Current Situation and Countermeasures of Agricultural Modernization in China

2013 ◽  
Vol 860-863 ◽  
pp. 3104-3107
Author(s):  
Wan Min Ma ◽  
Wan Zheng Ma
Keyword(s):  
Rural Areas ◽  
Agricultural Production ◽  
Agricultural Development ◽  
Paper Analysis ◽  
Farm Machinery ◽  
Agricultural Modernization ◽  
Security Services ◽  
Production Safety ◽  
Safety Work ◽  
Improvement Measures

Agricultural machinery production safety work is the work of national security, an important part of the production. Based on summarizing the research status of farm machinery safety supervision, this paper analysis the main problems of farm machinery safety supervision ,combining with the actual farm machinery safety supervision we propose improvement measures ,we focus on technology innovation to improve service farm machinery safety supervision level, to promote the cause of farm machinery safety supervision development, to improve agricultural production safety, We should be better for farmers to get rich, agricultural development and social harmony and stability in rural areas to provide security services.

scholarly journals Economic Analysis of Fertilizer Demand in the Punjab

1977 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul Salam
Keyword(s):  
Economic Analysis ◽  
Agricultural Production ◽  
Agricultural Development ◽  
Chemical Fertilizers ◽  
Farm Machinery ◽  
Farm Productivity ◽  
Farm Production ◽  
Fertilizer Demand ◽  
Farm Inputs

It is a well known fact that increased use of purchased farm inputs, such as chemical fertilizers, pesticides, seeds and farm machinery, etc., has been associated with a substantial increase in agricultural production and higher farm productivity. Since demand for farm inputs is derived from demand for farm products, therefore, agricultural development in a country or region may be studied either through the changes in farm production and productivity, or through the changes in demand for various farm inputs. The demand for fertilizers, especially, lends itself to this type of analysis, because fertilizer is a highly divisible farm input.

scholarly journals Research on Cultivation Ways of New-Type Professional Farmers under the Background of Rural Revitalization Strategy

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 248
Author(s):  
Shijie Chen
Keyword(s):  
Rural Areas ◽  
Agricultural Development ◽  
Basic Education ◽  
Training Model ◽  
Development Planning ◽  
Advanced Technology ◽  
The Social ◽  
Rural Revitalization ◽  
Improvement Measures ◽  
New Type

<p>Due to the focus on solving the issues concerning agriculture, rural areas and peasantry, the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China proposed a rural revitalization strategy. In this era, new-type professional farmers came into being. They helped the development of agriculture and accelerated the process of rural revitalization. However, there are still some obvious problems which urgently need to take corresponding improvement measures in the cultivation and development of new-type professional farmers. To solve these problems, it is required to set a premium on basic education in rural areas and promote advanced technology; cultivate correct professional values and improve the social status of farmers; adhere to the training model that combines theory with practice and enrich teaching methods; pay attention to the targeted training of talents at different levels and form reasonable teaching structures; coordinate agricultural development planning and develop regional characteristic agriculture.</p>

scholarly journals STRUCTURAL CHANGES OF FARMER’S FARMS: CASE STUDY OF LITHUANIA

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jurgita ZALECKIENĖ
Keyword(s):  
Rural Areas ◽  
Agricultural Production ◽  
Agricultural Development ◽  
Structural Changes ◽  
Agricultural Sector ◽  
Statistical Data ◽  
Family Farm ◽  
The Eu ◽  
Significant Factors

Due to historical circumstances, the development of Lithuanian commercial farmer’s farms is slow; however, farmer’s farms are very important to the vitality of rural areas while developing agricultural commodities and goods. The purpose of this article – to analyze the structural changes in farmer’s farms and present the directions of future development. Structural changes in Lithuanian farmer’s farms during the 2005 – 2015 timeframe were analyzed while looking at the diagnostic indicators, which are the following: the number of farmer’s farms, the structure of farmer’s farms according to their size, the activity units of farmer’s farms, age of farmers, farmer’s farms sources of income. In order to study the statistical data, methods of systemization, logical analysis and generalization were applied. The analysis of the statistical data suggests that the following structural changes are taking place in Lithuanian farmer’s farms: the number of registered farmer’s farms increases and the farmers’ are getting younger. One of the most significant factors causing the structural changes in holdings – the EU financial support for the agricultural development and the changing customer demands. More and more often rural areas perform residential function and new living areas are developed. There is a predominance of the small farms (up to 10 hectares). This is mainly a result of the reform in agricultural sector at the end of 20th century. Many small agricultural holdings were established due to this reform. However, significant changes occur while choosing and/or combining the activity units of the farm: the number of farms specializing in crops increases, the number of the holdings focusing on livestock and combined farming (crops and livestock) is declining; also, farmer’s farms with diversified income or the activity units grow in number. Limited opportunities to intensify agricultural production in small farmer’s farms caused the fact that activities or income were diversified. The model of family farm remains; however, the relation between activity and the usage of family’s labour in farm activity changes.

scholarly journals Issues related to marginal lands with reference to selected agricultural problematic areas

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 265-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justyna Wójcik-Leń ◽  
Katarzyna Sobolewska-Mikulska
Keyword(s):  
Social Development ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Agricultural Production ◽  
Agricultural Development ◽  
Production Potential ◽  
Marginal Lands ◽  
Marginal Areas ◽  
Original Definition ◽  
Food Shortages ◽  
Definition Of

AbstractFunctions of rural areas are influenced, among others, by historical conditions of social development, such as: the intensity of population growth, the insufficient level of produced crops and the permanent food shortages. Such approach to rural areas contributed to development of less useful areas, characterised by the low production potential, for agricultural purposes. Besides, those areas are also characterised by the intensive fragmentation of arable lands and directing the agricultural production to meet own demands of farmers. Professional publications include many proposals concerning definitions of marginal lands with reference to problematic areas. It mainly depends on the field of research, the authors and the approach to the discussed issues. The objective of this paper is to review the terminology and characteristics of marginal areas and problematic areas. As a result, the original definition of agricultural problematic areas will be proposed by the authors; this is important in Poland, in particular, when those issues are considered from the perspective of increasing the size of problematic areas and agricultural development in those areas.

scholarly journals DEVELOPMENT OF RURAL AREAS OF RUSSIA AND JORDAN

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-142
Author(s):  
Veronika Alhanaqtah ◽  
Antonina Pakhomova
Keyword(s):  
Rural Areas ◽  
Agricultural Production ◽  
Agricultural Development ◽  
Agricultural Sector ◽  
Swot Analysis ◽  
Statistical Data ◽  
Economic Aspects ◽  
Labor Resources ◽  
Agricultural Areas ◽  
Specific Country

Rural areas both in Russia and Jordan are characterized by the lack of job places and relatively low opportunities for female and youth labor. The situation is worsened by the decrease in the efficiency of the agricultural production in general. Institutional and technological transformations are required to improve the efficiency of the agricultural sector which will inevitably be accompanied by the expansion of the employment. The purpose of the research is to analyze socio-economic aspects of agricultural sectors of Russia and Jordan and to develop proposals for the management of labor resources with the focus on women employment. Research methods consist of comparative analysis of socio-economic development of agricultural areas on the basis of statistical data for Russia and Jordan as well as SWOT analysis. It is recommended to launch a national project on agricultural development in Jordan, as in Russia, with specific country targets and similar objectives pointed out in the study.

scholarly journals Rural population dependence on the level of agricultural development: panel data analysis of Leningrad oblast

POPULATION ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-102
Author(s):  
Yulia Nikulina ◽  
Tatiana Yurchenko ◽  
Vladimir Surovtsev
Keyword(s):  
Panel Data ◽  
Rural Development ◽  
Population Size ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Rural Population ◽  
Agricultural Production ◽  
Agricultural Development ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Leningrad Oblast ◽  
Agricultural Producers

Rural development has been and remains a relevant government task. Dynamic structural and technological changes in the agricultural sector lead to the need of reassessing the mutual influence of the level of development of agricultural production and rural areas. The study deals with quantitative assessment of the dependence of rural population size as an integral indicator of socio-economic well-being of rural areas on selected factors and indicators that characterize the level of agricultural development, its sectoral specifics and the structure of agricultural producers. Empirical estimates were obtained from panel data of municipal districts in Leningrad oblast for 2012-2018. The greatest positive impact on the rural population size among the considered characteristics of agriculture is determined for the factor of sown areas that is associated with the specifics of agricultural sub-sectors, their different needs for such factors as land and labor, the development potential for small-scale farming. It was found that the concentration of agricultural production in the large commercial sector has a negative impact on the rural population size. This is explained by difference in employment dynamics and redistribution of resources between categories of agricultural producers. Modeling results showed that agrarian subsidies received by agricultural producers have a statistically insignificant impact on rural population that justifies the need to adjust the orientation and forms of agricultural state support to achieve a synergetic effect on rural development.

scholarly journals Kajian Kritis terhadap Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Perdesaan di Indonesia

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 92
Author(s):  
Erizal Jamal
Keyword(s):  
Rural Development ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Agricultural Development ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Paper Analysis ◽  
Entry Point ◽  
Project Approach ◽  
Community Initiative ◽  
The Government ◽  
Initiative Program

<strong>English</strong><br />The main problem of rural development in Indonesia is related with coordination among the main actors and the focus of activities. In this paper, the main problem of rural development in Indonesia based on the experience of China in the previous program and rural development is examined. In some part of the paper,  analysis was focused on the Rural Agribussines Development Program (PUAP), an initiative program of Ministry of Agricultural for poverty alleviation and rural development. Similar with the previous program in rural development that initiated by the government, PUAP is a top down project approach; most of the initiative come from the central goverment. The mechanism of project decision is dominated by the goverment role and structure, and less of rural community initiative. The maximum impact of the PUAP project is an entry point for agricultural development in rural areas. <br /><br /><br /><strong>Indonesian</strong><br />Salah satu persoalan pokok dalam pembangunan perdesaan  di Indonesia adalah kurang adanya koordinasi antar berbagai pihak yang terlibat dalam kegiatan tersebut serta  fokus kegiatan yang kurang begitu jelas. Tulisan ini mencoba menelaah beberapa persoalan mendasar dalam pembangunan perdesaan di Indonesia, beranjak dari pengalaman yang pernah ada dan perbandingan dengan  pola pendekatan yang digunakan oleh China dalam pembangunan perdesaannya. Kajian ini pada beberapa bagian menelaah pendekatan yang digunakan Departemen Pertanian dalam pembangunan perdesaan melalui pendekatan Pengembangan Usaha Agribisnis Perdesaan (PUAP) yang dilaksanakan mulai tahun 2008 dalam kerangka Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Mandiri (PNPM Mandiri). PUAP merupakan program terobosan Departemen Pertanian dalam mengurangi kemiskinan dan pengangguran di perdesaan. Sebagaimana program sejenis yang pernah dilaksanakan sebelumnya, program ini lebih dominan sebagai suatu upaya terpusat dalam menata pembangunan pertanian dan perdesaan di Indonesia. Dalam pendekatan semacam ini, mekanisme pelaksanaan sangat tergantung pada struktur birokrasi, sehingga pengambilan keputusan banyak dilakukan oleh pengelola dari kalangan pemerintah diberbagai level. Masyarakat perdesaan masih sering diposisikan sebagai objek. Berdasarkan kondisi ini sangat sulit diharapkan program ini dapat mencapai hasil maksimal bagi upaya peningkatan pendapatan petani dalam waktu singkat. Hasill maksimal yang mungkin dapat diharapkan dari pelaksanaan program ini adalah sebagai entry point dan perekat seluruh program Departemen Pertanian  dalam pembangunan perdesaan.

The Modernization of the Peasant Economy: In Search of the Socialist Path (小农经济现代化的社会主义道路)

Rural China ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 433-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haijuan Wang (王海娟) ◽  
Xuefeng He (贺雪峰)
Keyword(s):  
Agricultural Production ◽  
Agricultural Development ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Chinese Government ◽  
Family Farms ◽  
Agricultural Modernization ◽  
Small Family ◽  
Chinese Agriculture ◽  
Responsibility System ◽  
Peasant Economy

Past studies have discussed the “socialist” nature of agricultural development in China in terms of equality in distribution since the introduction of the Household Responsibility System (hrs) and its institutional necessities. This article instead addresses the issue of the modernization of the peasant economy by exploring the various practices in agricultural production that led to a socialist path since 1980. The peasant economy under thehrstakes the form of a dual-layer management, and the collective economy is under the unified management by the collective. The collective economy propels the modernization of the peasant economy by the means of integration of funding, integration of land rights, and land concentration, respectively, in response to the different phases in the development of the forces of production. What is emerging in China is the fourth path to agricultural modernization characteristic of China, after the existing three paths, namely capitalist agriculture of large private farms, socialist agriculture of large collective farms, and the capitalist agriculture of small family farms. This new path, or socialist agriculture of small family farms, is characterized by the enlargement of the management unit on the basis of the collective economy that overcomes the constraints of the peasant economy. However, while institutional possibilities do exist for a socialist path in agricultural development in China, the policies pursued by the Chinese government are turning Chinese agriculture into capitalist agriculture of small family farms.学界从均等分配角度揭示了家庭承包经营制后农业发展的“社会主义”性质及其制度合理性，本文尝试从农业生产角度揭示1980年以来中国社会主义道路实践，探究小农经济现代化问题。家庭承包经营制改革后的小农经济采取双层经营体制，集体经济以集体统一经营的方式存在。在不同生产力阶段，集体经济分别以资金整合、地权整合和土地集中的方式，促进小农经济现代化。从集体经济扩大农业经营单位，克服小农经济局限性的角度，中国在资本主式私人大农场农业、社会主义式集体大农场农业、资本主义式小农家庭农业之外，探索出具有中国特色的第四种农业现代化道路，即社会主义式小农家庭农业。中国农业发展有走向社会主义道路的制度空间，但中国政府的政策选择使得中国农业发展正在走向资本主义式小农家庭农业。(This article is in Chinese.)

Territorial Features of Application of Precision Farming Technologies

2020 ◽  
pp. 59-66
Author(s):  
E.A. Skvortsov ◽  
◽  
A.S. Gusev ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Regional Development ◽  
Unemployment Rate ◽  
Negative Correlation ◽  
Agricultural Production ◽  
Agricultural Development ◽  
Precision Farming ◽  
Production Index ◽  
Scientific Problem ◽  
Development Indicators ◽  
Production Growth

The article discusses the issues of territorial patterns in the implementation of precision farming technologies, which are insufficiently studied and constitute a significant scientific problem. The purpose of the study is to identify the territorial patterns of the introduction of precision farming technologies in conjunction with the indicators of agricultural development in the regions. The number of applied precision farming technologies was clarified, 37 regions took part in the study, 24 of them provided information on the application of these technologies. The results of correlation of regional development indicators (12 indicators in three blocks) and the amount of equipment with precision farming elements are presented. The greatest positive correlation is observed between the introduction of precision farming technologies and the agricultural production index at comparable prices (0.51) and the level of subsidies (0.37). The greatest negative correlation is observed between the introduction of these technologies and the change in the registered unemployment rate (-0.3). Based on the results obtained, it can be assumed that in regions with high values of agricultural production growth and subsidies, precision farming technologies will be most intensively introduced.

The Relationship between the Development of Human Capital and the Agricultural Economy in Rural Areas

2020 ◽  
pp. 61-65
Author(s):  
B.A. Voronin ◽  
◽  
I.P. Chupina ◽  
Ya.V. Voronina ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Capital ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Agricultural Production ◽  
Agricultural Sector ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Standard View ◽  
Household Factors ◽  
Economic Transformations ◽  
The Relationship

The article discusses a non-standard view of the formation of human capital for work in organizations of the agricultural sector of the economy, in the context of modern socio-economic transformations. In the classical sense, human capital for agriculture should be formed and developed in rural areas. But in real life, this is not always the case, because there are many factors that prevent the classical solution of this problem. First, the demographic factor affects, second, social and household factors, and third, in many rural areas there are no working agricultural organizations where qualified agricultural specialists can work. All these and other circumstances actualize the problem of the quality of human capital in rural areas in relation to the development of agricultural production.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document