Antibiotic prescribing practices in three neonatology units in Kigali, Rwanda. – an observational study

Introduction: There is limited published data on antibiotic use in neonatal units in resource-poor settings. Objectives: This study sought to describe antibiotic prescribing practices in three neonatology units in Kigali, Rwanda. Methods: A multi-center, cross-sectional study conducted in two tertiary and one urban district hospital in Kigali, Rwan- da. Participants were neonates admitted in neonatology who received a course of antibiotics during their admission. Data collected included risk factors for neonatal sepsis, clinical signs, symptoms, investigations for neonatal sepsis, antibiotics prescribed, and the number of deaths in the included cohort. Results: 126 neonates were enrolled with 42 from each site. Prematurity (38%) followed by membrane rupture more than 18 hours (25%) were the main risk factors for neonatal sepsis. Ampicillin and Gentamicin (85%) were the most commonly used first-line antibiotics for suspected neonatal sepsis. Most neonates (87%) did not receive a second-line antibiotic. Cefotaxime (11%), was the most commonly used second-line antibiotic. The median duration of antibiotic use was four days in all sur- viving neonates (m=113). In neonates with negative blood culture and normal C-reactive protein (CRP), the median duration of antibiotics was 3.5 days; and for neonates, with positive blood cultures, the median duration was 11 days. Thirteen infants died (10%) at all three sites, with no significant difference between the sites. Conclusion: The median antibiotic duration for neonates with normal lab results exceeded the recommended duration mandated by the national neonatal protocol. We recommend the development of antibiotic stewardship programs in neo- natal units in Rwanda to prevent the adverse effects which may be caused by inappropriate or excessive use of antibiotics. Keywords: (MeSH): Antimicrobial stewardship; anti-bacterial agents; neonatal sepsis; sepsis; infant mortality; neonatal intensive care units; Africa; Rwanda.

Download Full-text

Audit of Antibiotic Prescribing Practices for Neonatal Sepsis and Measurement of Outcome in New Born Unit at Kenyatta National Hospital

International Journal of Pediatrics ◽

10.1155/2019/7930238 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 2019 ◽

pp. 1-7 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Priti Jagdishbhai Tank ◽

Anjumanara Omar ◽

Rachel Musoke

Keyword(s):

Neonatal Sepsis ◽

Complete Blood Count ◽

Antibiotic Use ◽

Preterm Neonates ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Prescribing Practices ◽

Reactive Protein ◽

High Index Of Suspicion ◽

Structured Questionnaire ◽

Overall Mortality

Background. Neonatal sepsis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. A high index of suspicion is required since features of sepsis are nonspecific. Auditing of antibiotic use is necessary to reduce misuse and minimise development of antibiotic resistance. Objectives. To assess the antibiotic prescribing practices in NBU at KNH against recommended Kenyan guidelines for neonatal sepsis. In addition, outcome within 7 days was described. Methods. This was a prospective audit of 320 neonates over a 2-month period at NBU of KNH. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire, stored in MS-EXCEL, and analysed using STATA. Results. Documentation of perinatal risk factors and clinical features at admission and at the time of change of antibiotics was very poor. The rate of investigations to confirm infection was very low. Blood cultures were done only in 13 (4%) neonates on admission, while complete blood count and C reactive protein were done in 224 (70%) and 198 (62%), respectively. Appropriate antibiotics as per the Kenyan guidelines were prescribed in 313 (97.8%) of neonates on admission. However, these were not stopped at 48-72 hours for the 148 (53.62%) who had improved. Overall mortality was high in neonates at 80 (25%). Majority (55%) died within 48 hours. Mortality was high among preterm neonates; 70 (43.8%) died out of 160. Conclusion. Overall documentation and investigations to confirm infection was poor. The continuation of antibiotics was inappropriate. Overall mortality was high especially in the first 48 hours of admission. To improve documentation, availability of a checklist on admission is recommended.

Download Full-text

Antibiotic Use and Associated Risk Factors for Antibiotic Prescribing in COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients

Journal of Pharmacy Practice ◽

10.1177/08971900211030248 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 089719002110302

Author(s):

Alysa J. Martin ◽

Stephanie Shulder ◽

David Dobrzynski ◽

Katelyn Quartuccio ◽

Kelly E. Pillinger

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Final Analysis ◽

Antibiotic Use ◽

Hospital Length ◽

Hospitalized Patients ◽

Hospital Length Of Stay ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Prescribing Practices ◽

Factors Associated ◽

Associated Risk Factors

Background: Literature suggests that antibiotic prescribing in COVID-19 patients is high. Currently, there are insufficient data on what drives antibiotic prescribing practices throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Objective: This study sought to determine antibiotic use rates and identify risk factors for antibiotic prescribing in hospitalized patients. It was the first study to assess risk factors for receiving more than 1 course of antibiotics. Methods: This was a retrospective, multi-center, observational study. Patients admitted from March 1, 2020, to May 31, 2020, and treated for COVID-19 were included. The primary endpoint was the rate of antibiotic use during hospitalization. Secondary endpoints included risk factors associated with antibiotic use, risk factors associated with receiving more than 1 antibiotic course, and rate of microbiologically confirmed infections. Results: A total of 208 encounters (198 patients) were included in the final analysis. Eighty-three percent of patients received at least 1 course of antibiotics, despite low rates of microbiologically confirmed infection (12%). Almost one-third of patients (30%) received more than 1 course of antibiotics. Risk factors identified for both antibiotic prescribing and receiving more than 1 course of antibiotics included increased hospital length of stay (median 12 days), intensive care unit admission, and the necessity for mechanical ventilation. Conclusion and Relevance: There were high rates of antibiotic prescribing with low rates of microbiologically confirmed bacterial co-infection. Many patients received more than 1 course of antibiotics during hospitalization. This study highlights the importance and demand for appropriate antibiotic stewardship practices in COVID-19 patients.

Download Full-text

A retrospective audit of antibiotic prescriptions in a Lebanese Hospital

International Journal of Infection Control ◽

10.3396/ijic.v15i1.001.19 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 15 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Mohamad Ibrahim ◽

Zeinab Bazzi

Keyword(s):

Epidemiological Data ◽

Antibiotic Use ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Team Approach ◽

Strong Correlations ◽

Prescribing Practices ◽

Antimicrobial Drugs ◽

Stewardship Program ◽

Retrospective Audit ◽

Attending Physician

Despite the frequent alarms that have been published about the adverse effects of antibiotic use and misuse, physicians prescribe to patients approximately fifty percent of unnecessary antimicrobials. In an attempt to decrease the emergence of antimicrobial resistance and increase awareness, a team approach is required to address this prescribing phenomenon in a feasible manner. A retrospective study was done at a one-hundred-forty-bed hospital with a representative sample size of 368 patients. Patient data was collected and analyzed by a stewardship team. The overall antibiotic inappropriate rate was 45.8%, which is relatively high and consistent with the findings of other studies mentioned in the literature. This study aimed to provide baseline epidemiological data on the use of antibiotics in a Lebanese hospital and has revealed several notable patterns of antibiotic prescribing practices among Lebanese physicians such as the use of antimicrobial drugs example penicillin was consistently high. Strong correlations were identified between the type of attending physician and antibiotic appropriateness. These findings will be important in constructing an antimicrobial stewardship program to reduce antibiotic misuse.

Download Full-text

Implementing interventions to reduce antibiotic use: a qualitative study in high-prescribing practices

BMC Family Practice ◽

10.1186/s12875-021-01371-6 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 22 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Aleksandra J. Borek ◽

◽

Anne Campbell ◽

Elle Dent ◽

Christopher C. Butler ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Focus Groups ◽

Point Of Care ◽

Antibiotic Use ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Prescribing Practices ◽

Focus Group Study ◽

Clinical Uncertainty ◽

Reactive Protein ◽

Clinical Tools ◽

The Many

Abstract Background Trials have shown that delayed antibiotic prescriptions (DPs) and point-of-care C-Reactive Protein testing (POC-CRPT) are effective in reducing antibiotic use in general practice, but these were not typically implemented in high-prescribing practices. We aimed to explore views of professionals from high-prescribing practices about uptake and implementation of DPs and POC-CRPT to reduce antibiotic use. Methods This was a qualitative focus group study in English general practices. The highest antibiotic prescribing practices in the West Midlands were invited to participate. Clinical and non-clinical professionals attended focus groups co-facilitated by two researchers. Focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. Results Nine practices (50 professionals) participated. Four main themes were identified. Compatibility of strategies with clinical roles and experience – participants viewed the strategies as having limited value as ‘clinical tools’, perceiving them as useful only in ‘rare’ instances of clinical uncertainty and/or for those less experienced. Strategies as ‘social tools’ – participants perceived the strategies as helpful for negotiating treatment decisions and educating patients, particularly those expecting antibiotics. Ambiguities – participants perceived ambiguities around when they should be used, and about their impact on antibiotic use. Influence of context – various other situational and practical issues were raised with implementing the strategies. Conclusions High-prescribing practices do not view DPs and POC-CRPT as sufficiently useful ‘clinical tools’ in a way which corresponds to the current policy approach advocating their use to reduce clinical uncertainty and improve antimicrobial stewardship. Instead, policy attention should focus on how these strategies may instead be used as ‘social tools’ to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use. Attention should also focus on the many ambiguities (concerns and questions) about, and contextual barriers to, using these strategies that need addressing to support wider and more consistent implementation.

Download Full-text

Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions to Optimize Treatment of Infections in Nursing Home Residents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal of Applied Gerontology ◽

10.1177/07334648211018299 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 073346482110182

Author(s):

Sainfer Aliyu ◽

Jasmine L. Travers ◽

S. Layla Heimlich ◽

Joanne Ifill ◽

Arlene Smaldone

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Nursing Home ◽

Antibiotic Stewardship ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Nursing Home Residents ◽

Antibiotic Use ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Prescribing Practices ◽

Stewardship Program ◽

Meta Analyses

Effects of antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) interventions to optimize antibiotic use for infections in nursing home (NH) residents remain unclear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess ASPs in NHs and their effects on antibiotic use, multi-drug-resistant organisms, antibiotic prescribing practices, and resident mortality. Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using five databases (1988–2020). Nineteen articles were included, 10 met the criteria for quantitative synthesis. Inappropriate antibiotic use decreased following ASP intervention in eight studies with a pooled decrease of 13.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: [4.7, 23.0]; Cochran’s Q = 166,837.8, p < .001, I2 = 99.9%) across studies. Decrease in inappropriate antibiotic use was highest in studies that examined antibiotic use for urinary tract infection (UTI). Education and antibiotic stewardship algorithms for UTI were the most effective interventions. Evidence surrounding ASPs in NH is weak, with recommendations suited for UTIs.

Download Full-text

Prescribers’ Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviors on Antibiotics, Antibiotic Use and Antibiotic Resistance in Jordan

Antibiotics ◽

10.3390/antibiotics10070858 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (7) ◽

pp. 858

Author(s):

Reema A. Karasneh ◽

Sayer I. Al-Azzam ◽

Mera Ababneh ◽

Ola Al-Azzeh ◽

Ola B. Al-Batayneh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Antibiotic Resistance ◽

Antibiotic Use ◽

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Prescribing Practices ◽

Online Questionnaire ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Attitudes And Behaviors ◽

And Behaviors ◽

Ease Of Access

More research is needed on the drivers of irrational antibiotic prescribing among healthcare professionals and to ensure effective prescribing and an adequate understanding of the issue of antibiotic resistance. This study aimed at evaluating prescribers’ knowledge, attitudes and behaviors about antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance. A cross-sectional study was conducted utilizing an online questionnaire and included physicians and dentists from all sectors in Jordan. A total of 613 prescribers were included (physicians n = 409, dentists n = 204). Respondents’ knowledge on effective use, unnecessary use or associated side effects of antibiotics was high (>90%), compared with their knowledge on the spread of antibiotic resistance (62.2%). For ease of access to the required guidelines on managing infections, and to materials that advise on prudent antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance, prescribers agreed in 62% and 46.1% of cases, respectively. 28.4% of respondents had prescribed antibiotics when they would have preferred not to do so more than once a day or more than once a week. Among respondents who prescribed antibiotics, 63.4% would never or rarely give out resources on prudent use of antibiotics for infections. The findings are of importance to inform antibiotic stewardships about relevant interventions aimed at changing prescribers’ behaviors and improving antibiotic prescribing practices.

Download Full-text

An Assessment of Inappropriate Antibiotic Use and Guideline Adherence for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofy198 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 5 (9) ◽

Cited By ~ 27

Author(s):

Michael J Durkin ◽

Matthew Keller ◽

Anne M Butler ◽

Jennie H Kwon ◽

Erik R Dubberke ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Urinary Tract ◽

Urinary Tract Infections ◽

Antibiotic Use ◽

Emergency Department Visits ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Prescribing Practices ◽

Duration Of Treatment ◽

Minimal Impact ◽

Tract Infections ◽

The Impact

Abstract Background In 2011, The Infectious Diseases Society of America released a clinical practice guideline (CPG) that recommended short-course antibiotic therapy and avoidance of fluoroquinolones for uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs). Recommendations from this CPG were rapidly disseminated to clinicians via review articles, UpToDate, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website; however, it is unclear if this CPG had an impact on national antibiotic prescribing practices. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of outpatient and emergency department visits within a commercial insurance database between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2013. We included nonpregnant women aged 18–44 years who had an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code for a UTI with a concurrent antibiotic prescription. We performed interrupted time series analyses to determine the impact of the CPG on the appropriateness of the antibiotic agent and duration. Results We identified 654 432 women diagnosed with UTI. The patient population was young (mean age, 31 years) and had few comorbidities. Fluoroquinolones, nonfirstline agents, were the most commonly prescribed antibiotic class both before and after release of the guidelines (45% vs 42%). Wide variation was observed in the duration of treatment, with >75% of prescriptions written for nonrecommended treatment durations. The CPG had minimal impact on antibiotic prescribing behavior by providers. Conclusions Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing is common for the treatment of UTIs. The CPG was not associated with a clinically meaningful change in national antibiotic prescribing practices for UTIs. Further interventions are necessary to improve outpatient antibiotic prescribing for UTIs.

Download Full-text

A prospective antibiotic point prevalence survey in two primary referral hospitals during and after pilgrims stay in Madinah, Saudi Arabia

Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research ◽

10.4314/tjpr.v19i2.23 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 19 (2) ◽

pp. 391-399

Author(s):

Yaser M. ◽

Ahmad K. Aljabri ◽

Faisal N. Alsaadi ◽

Lamiaa M. Rizk ◽

Renad Y. Alahmadi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Improvement ◽

Antibiotic Therapy ◽

Prevalence Rate ◽

Antibiotic Use ◽

Point Prevalence ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Prevalence Survey ◽

Point Prevalence Survey ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Referral Hospitals

Purpose: To assess current patterns of antibiotic use by carrying out two point-prevalence surveys (PPS) in Madinah after the return of hajj pilgrims from Makkah and when Madinah is free from pilgrims. Methods: In September 2016 and November 2016, a prospective PPS was conducted on two separate dates (during the hajj pilgrims stay in Madinah and after they leave). Data on antibiotics use were generated during these two periods. This involved an audit from all the departments of two referral hospitals (King Fahad Hospital (KFH) - 425 beds, and Al Ansar Hospital - 100 beds) of inpatients records. Data were collected using standard forms adapted from the European Centre for Disease Control (ECDC). Results: A total of 675 inpatients were included in PPS; among them, 332 (49.18 %) patients were receiving antibiotic therapy. In September 2016, 168 patients were treated with antibiotics, with a prevalence rate of 50.60 %, whereas, in November 2016, the prevalence rate was 49.40 %. Overall, 198 patients were identified in surgical wards, of which 132 patients (66.6 %) were receiving antibiotic therapy; 121 patients in ICU of which 70 patients (57.8 %) received antibiotics; 13 patients in other wards of which 6 (46.1 %) received antibiotic treatment; and 343 patients in medical wards of which 126 patients (36.7 %) were treated with antibiotics. There was no significant difference in prevalence of antibiotic prescribing between the two surveys (Pearson Chi-square test, p = 0.56) and with regards to patient age between the two surveys (Mann-Whitney U-test, p = 0.32). Conclusion: The results demonstrate that antibiotic use with adherence to hospital guidelines and PPS helps in identifying targets for quality improvement. Moreover, to escalate the prudent use of antibiotics in hospitals, PPS provides a useful tool. Furthermore, this survey provides a background to evaluate antibiotic use by a standardized methodology. Keywords: Point prevalence survey, Antibiotic use, Prescribing practices, Antibiotic resistance, Quality improvement, Antibiotic stewardship, Hajj, Pilgrims

Download Full-text

Understanding antibiotic prophylaxis prescribing in pediatric surgical specialties

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology ◽

10.1017/ice.2020.71 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 41 (6) ◽

pp. 666-671

Author(s):

Sara M. Malone ◽

Natalie S. Seigel ◽

Jason G. Newland ◽

Jacqueline M. Saito ◽

Virginia R. McKay

Keyword(s):

Focus Groups ◽

Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽

Scientific Evidence ◽

Implementation Strategies ◽

Interventional Cardiology ◽

Antibiotic Use ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Prescribing Practices ◽

Health Crisis ◽

Poor Outcomes

AbstractBackground:Overuse of antibiotics has caused secondary poor outcomes and has led to a current rate of antibiotic resistant infections that constitutes a public health crisis. In pediatric surgical specialties, children continue to receive unnecessary antibiotics.Objective:To understand the factors that contribute to pediatric surgeons’ decisions regarding the use of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis.Methods:Focus groups included pediatric proceduralists/surgeons from the following specialties: interventional cardiology, otolaryngology, orthopedic surgery, cardiothoracic surgery, and general surgery.Results:A total of 23 surgeons with a median of 9 years of experience (range, 0.5–29 years) participated in the focus groups that lasted 30–90 minutes each. Five themes emerged influencing beliefs about antibiotic prescribing practices: (1) reliance on previous experience and early education, (2) balancing antibiotic use with risk of infection, (3) uncertainty about the state of the scientific evidence, (4) understanding importance of communication and team collaboration, and (5) a prevalence of hospital-level concerns.Conclusions:Surgeons describe a complex set of factors that impact their antibiotic prescribing in pediatric surgical cases. They reported initial, but not ongoing, training and a use of individual weight of risk and benefit as a major dictator of prescribing practices. Antimicrobial stewardship programs should work with surgeons to develop acceptable implementation strategies to optimize antibiotic prescribing.

Download Full-text

Development of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention Using a Model of Actionable Feedback

Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1155/2012/150367 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 2012 ◽

pp. 1-6 ◽

Cited By ~ 22

Author(s):

Sameer J. Patel ◽

Lisa Saiman ◽

Jennifer M. Duchon ◽

David Evans ◽

Yu-hui Ferng ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Nurse Practitioners ◽

Neonatal Intensive Care ◽

Laboratory Data ◽

Antibiotic Use ◽

Shared Responsibility ◽

Individual Responsibility ◽

Audit And Feedback ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Prescribing Practices ◽

Data Elements

We describe the development of an audit and feedback intervention to improve antibiotic prescribing in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) using a theoretical framework. Participants included attending physicians, neonatal fellows, pediatric residents, and nurse practitioners. The intervention was based on the “model of actionable feedback” which emphasizes that feedback should be timely, individualized, nonpunitive, and customized to be effective. We found that real-time feedback could not be provided for the parameters established in this study, as we had to collect and analyze numerous data elements to assess appropriate initiation and continuation of antibiotics and required longer intervals to examine trends in antibiotic use. We learned during focus groups that NICU clinicians strongly resisted assigning individual responsibility for antibiotic prescribing as they viewed this as a shared responsibility informed by each patient's laboratory data and clinical course. We were able to create a non-punitive atmosphere thanks to written informed consent from NICU attendings and assurance from leadership that prescribing practices would not be used to assess job performance. We provided customized, meaningful feedback integrating input from the participants. Adapting the principles of the “model of actionable feedback” to provide feedback for antimicrobial prescribing practices proved challenging in the NICU setting.

Download Full-text