The Influence of Work Environment and Leadership Style on Employee Productivity

The productivity of human resources needs to be continuously improved through various sustainable efforts. The work environment is one of the important efforts to increase teacher productivity. Schools need to pay attention to the work environment so that teacher productivity increases, both physical and non-physical environments. This research will be carried out at the Adiguna Maritim Polytechnic, which will be held in March 2019. The results of this study show. (1) It can be seen that the adjusted value of the R square is 0.501 or 50.1%. This shows that the Work Environment Variable (X1) and the Leadership Style Variable (X2) can explain the Work Productivity Variable (Y) by 50.1%, the rest 49.9% (100% - 50.1%) is true by other variables outside the research model. (2) The results of the t test (partial) show that t (2.528)> t table (1.697), as well as the significance value of 0.017 <0.05, it can reject the first hypothesis accepted, meaning that the Work Environment Variable (X1) affects the Work Productivity (Y) is accepted. (3) The results of the t test (partial) show that t count (4.269)> t table (1.697), and a significance value of 0.000 <0.05, it can be rejected that the second hypothesis is accepted, meaning that the leadership style variable (X2) affects the work productivity variable. (Y). (4) The results of the simultaneous test (F) can be seen that Fcount (16,585)> Ftable (3,295), and a significance value of 0.000 <0.05, it can be rejected for the third acceptance, meaning that the Work Environment Variable (X1), the Leadership Style Variable (X2 ) influence jointly (simultaneously) on the Work Productivity Variable (Y).

Download Full-text

PENGARUH DISIPLIN KERJA TERHADAP PRODUKTIVITAS KERJA KARYAWAN PT PERKEBUNAN NUSANTARA IV (PERSERO) UNIT USAHA PABATU

Jurnal Agriuma ◽

10.31289/agr.v1i2.2874 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 1 (2) ◽

pp. 14

Author(s):

Yulia Andini ◽

Yusniar Lubis ◽

Rahma Sari Siregar

Keyword(s):

Work Productivity ◽

T Test ◽

Employee Productivity ◽

Business Unit ◽

Test Results ◽

Insignificant Effect ◽

Use Of Time ◽

Simultaneous Test ◽

R Value ◽

Effective Use

<p>This study was conducted to determine the effect of work discipline on employee productivity at PT. Perkebunan Nusantara IV (Persero) Pabatu Business Unit. The population in this study were all employees of the department, engineering / processing, and general at PT. Perkebunan Nusantara IV (Persero) Unit Business Unit is 1031 people. the number of respondents used in this study were 104 people. The research was obtained from the results of the t test on the variables obeying all company regulations, namely 2.652> T table = 1.980 stating that complying with all company regulations had a positive and significant effect on employee work productivity. Effective use of time is 3,069 <Ttable = 1,980 stating that effective use of time has a positive and significant effect on employee work productivity variables. Responsibility for work and assignments is 5,467> T table = 1.980 states that work responsibilities and tasks have positive and significant to employee work productivity. The absentee level of 1,200 <Ttable = 1,980 has a positive and insignificant effect on employee work productivity. The simultaneous test results obtained are 262.880> 2.31, which states that work discipline simultaneously has a positive and significant effect on employee work productivity. And the R value obtained is 0.884. This figure shows that 88.4% of work productivity is explained by the variable work discipline.</p>

Download Full-text

Pengaruh Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Karyawan Pada CV. Padurenan Jaya Kontruksi

PARAMETER ◽

10.37751/parameter.v6i2.173 ◽

2022 ◽

Vol 6 (2) ◽

pp. 41-55

Author(s):

Shocky Lie

Keyword(s):

Quantitative Methods ◽

Work Productivity ◽

T Test ◽

Primary Data ◽

Employee Productivity ◽

Positive Effect ◽

Productivity Variable

This study aims to determine and analyze the effect of work discipline on the productivity of employees at CV. Padurenan Jaya Kontruksi. The research in this thesis uses quantitative methods and the sample used 48 respondents with saturated sampling calculations. The work discipline variable (X) and the work productivity variable (Y). Sources of data used consisted of primary data, namely data obtained directly from research respondents through questionnaires, interviews, observations, population, and samples in this study were employees of CV. Padurenan Jaya Kontruksi Bekasi. The tests were using SPSS 20. The results obtained from the study showed that there was a positive effect of work discipline on the work productivity of the employees at CV. Padurenan Jaya Kontruksi Bekasi. The results of the t-test have a significant effect on work discipline on employee productivity, this is evidenced by the variable (X) Work Discipline and variable (Y) Employee productivity has a significant value less than 0.05, namely (0.000 <0.05). This is evidenced by the significant value of the t-test, it is obtained a significant value of 0.000 smaller than 0.05, so it can be concluded that the hypothesis is received with a strong significanceAbstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis Pengaruh Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Karyawan CV. Padurenan Jaya Kontruksi. Penelitian pada skripsi ini mengguakan metode kuantitatif dan sampel yang digunakan adaalah sebanyak 48 respoden dengan menggunakan perhitungan sampling jenuh. Adapun variabel Disiplin Kerja (X), dan Variabel Produktivitas Kerja (Y). Sumber data yang diguakan terdiri dari data primer yaitu data yang diperole langsung dari responden penelitian melalui kuesioner, wawancara, observasi, populasi dan sampel pada penelitian ini adalah karyawan CV. Padurenan Jaya Kontruksi Bekasi. Pengujian dilakukan dengan menggunakan bantuan SPSS 20. Hasil yang didapat dari penelitian bahwa ada pengaruh positif dari disiplin kerja terhadap produktivitas kerja karyawan CV. Padurenan Jaya Kontruksi Bekasi. Hasil Uji t terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan disiplin kerja terhadap produktivitas kerja karyawan, hal ini dibuktikan bahwa variabel (X) Disiplin Kerja dan variabel (Y) Produktivitas kerja karyawan memiliki nilai signifikan lebih kecil dari 0,05 yaitu (0,000 < 0,05). Hal ini dibuktikan dengan nilai signifikan Uji t diperoleh nilai signifikan sebesar 0,000 lebih kecil dari 0,05 sehingga disimpulkan bahwa hipotesis diterima dengan signifikan kuat.

Download Full-text

The Effect of Motivation and Work Environment on The Performance of Employees In The Division of Pt. Socfindo Dolok Still

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS ◽

10.47191/ijmra/v4-i8-05 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 04 (08) ◽

Author(s):

Benhart Nainggolan ◽

Keyword(s):

Work Environment ◽

Work Motivation ◽

Employee Performance ◽

T Test ◽

Research Model ◽

Performance Variables ◽

Performance Variable ◽

The Third ◽

Simultaneous Test ◽

Environment Variable

This research shows. (1) It can be seen that the amount of adjusted R square value is 0.743 or 74.3% This shows that the Work Motivation Variable (X1) and Work Environment Variable (X2) can explain the Employee Performance Variable (Y) of 74.3% , the remaining 25.7% (100% - 74.3%) is explained by other variables outside the research model. (2) The results of the t-test (partial) can be seen that the obtained tcount is 4,750 With = 5%, ttable (5%; 34-2 = 32) the ttable value is 1,694. From the description it can be seen that tcount (4,750) > ttable (1.694), as well as the significance value of 0.00 <0.05, it can be concluded that the first hypothesis is accepted, meaning that the Work Motivation Variable (X1) has a significant effect on the Employee Performance Variable (Y). (3) The results of the t-test (partial) can be seen that the tcount value is 5.915 With = 5%, ttable (5%; 34-2 = 32) the ttable value is 1.694. From the description it can be seen that tcount (5.915) > ttable (1.694), and the significance value of 0.00 <0.05, it can be concluded that the second hypothesis is accepted, meaning that the Work Environment Variable (X2) has a significant effect on the Employee Performance Variable (Y). (4) The results of the simultaneous test (F) can be seen that the value of Fcount (48.721) > Ftable (3.30), and a significance value of 0.000 <0.05, it can be concluded that the third hypothesis is accepted, meaning that the Work Motivation Variable (X1), Variable Work Environment (X2) has a significant effect simultaneously (simultaneously) on Employee Performance Variables (Y).

Download Full-text

Discipline and Work Environment Affect Employee Productivity: Evidence From Indonesia

10.20944/preprints202105.0112.v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Rusdiyanto Rusdiyanto

Keyword(s):

Work Environment ◽

Stock Exchange ◽

Work Productivity ◽

Work Environments ◽

Employee Productivity ◽

Manufacturing Companies ◽

Public Agency ◽

Effectiveness And Efficiency ◽

Publicly Owned ◽

Survey Approach

Objective: This paper aims to test and evaluate the Effect of Discipline And Work Environment on Employee Productivity of state-owned public bodies.Design/methodology/approach: This paper uses a quantitative approach using a survey approach. The survey is a study conducted on the employee population of state-owned public agency companies, samples taken from the employee population of state-owned public agency companies to find events related to discipline variables and work environments that can affect employee productivity variables, to analise the influence between discipline variables and the work environment on employee productivity variables using a statistic regression approach. This method is used to explain the influence of discipline variables and work environment on employee productivity variables. This approach is simply to provide a description and test the influence between discipline variables and the work environment on employee productivity variables that can be known how much the influence of discipline variables and work environment on employee productivity variables.Findings: The findings of this study explain that discipline has an influence on the productivity of employees of publicly owned companies, the work environment has an influence on the productivity of employees of publicly owned companies, while together discipline and work environment have an influence on the productivity of employees of publicly owned companies.Practical Implications: The results of the study are recommended for employees to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the performance of state-owned public bodies.Originality: Previous research conducted to test the influence of discipline and work environment on the productivity of employees of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange, the findings concluded that discipline and work environment have an influence on the work productivity of employees of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. This research object of research on publicly owned companies owned by the state.

Download Full-text

Dataveillance in the Workplace

Handbook of Research on Emerging Developments in Data Privacy - Advances in Information Security, Privacy, and Ethics ◽

10.4018/978-1-4666-7381-6.ch004 ◽

2015 ◽

pp. 69-84

Author(s):

Regina Connolly

Keyword(s):

Work Environment ◽

Psychological Contract ◽

Work Productivity ◽

Work Relationships ◽

Employee Productivity ◽

Health And Wellbeing ◽

Emerging Issues ◽

Market Pressures ◽

Workplace Surveillance ◽

General Work

The work environment is changing in response to market pressures, and the psychological contract that previously typified many employer and employee work relationships is coming under distinct threat as pervasive Internet-based technologies now enable management to monitor employees' email, computer interactions, and general work productivity. Although in some cases management may have legitimate reasons to monitor employees' actions, it is becoming increasingly evident that the use of these technologies has the potential to negatively impact employee productivity and morale, and in some cases employee health and wellbeing. This chapter outlines some of the emerging issues relating to workplace surveillance from the employees' perspective, as well as the motivation behind management's decision to employ technologies in order monitor their employees.

Download Full-text

THE EFFECT OF PROFESSIONALISM ON EMPLOYEE WORK PRODUCTIVITY AT SAKURA JAYA COMPANY

Primanomics Jurnal Ekonomi & Bisnis ◽

10.31253/pe.v18i2.352 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 18 (2) ◽

pp. 56

Author(s):

Rinintha Parameswari ◽

Fidelis Wato Tholok ◽

Pujiarti Pujiarti

Keyword(s):

Resource Management ◽

Human Resources ◽

Human Resource Management ◽

Human Resource ◽

Work Productivity ◽

Employee Productivity ◽

Productivity Variable

The more professional human resources are in control, the vision and mission and goals of the company will be achieved effectively, efficiently, and productively (Budiharjo, 2015: 5). Therefore, human resource management is needed that is not only able to recruit it, but able to retain competent employees and improve the performance of its employees so the company can continue to develop better and be able to compete with its competitors (Budiharjo, 2015: 8). The results showed that: 1) There was an influence of professionalism on employee work productivity, as evidenced by the tcount for the Professionalism (X) variable of 20,830, while the t-table value for N = 85 was 1,988. So 20,830> 1,988, then H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted, it can be stated that Professionalism (X) has a significant effect on Employee Productivity (Y). Probability value (significance) = 0,000. So the probability is 0,000 below 0.05. Thus, H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted, it can be concluded that there is a positive and significant effect between the professional variable (X) on the Employee Productivity variable (Y), because the probability value is smaller than 0.05. 2) There is an influence of Professionalism on Employee Work Productivity, as evidenced by the R Square value of 0.839. This shows that 83.9% Professionalism (X) affects Employee Productivity (Y), while the remaining 16.1% is influenced by other factors not examined in this study.

Download Full-text

PENGARUH KOMPENSASI DAN DISIPLIN KERJA TERHADAP PRODUKTIVITAS KERJA KARYAWAN PADA MECHANICAL DIVISION PT MULIA MAKMUR ELEKTRIKATAMA

Majalah Ilmiah Bijak ◽

10.31334/bijak.v13i2.78 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 13 (2) ◽

pp. 210-222

Author(s):

Nidaul Izzah ◽

Ida Ardiani

Keyword(s):

Quantitative Methods ◽

Work Productivity ◽

Employee Productivity ◽

Test Results ◽

Analysis Method ◽

Multiple Correlation ◽

Strong Positive Relationship ◽

Independent Variable ◽

The Relationship ◽

Productivity Variable

The purpose of this study was to obtain information about the influence of compensation and working discipline on employee productivity, while the purpose is to obtain data empirically the extent of the influence of compensation and working discipline in increasing productivity employee. The data analysis method used is quantitative method. Quantitative methods are used to determine the relationship between the variable compensation (X1) and variable work discipline (X2) on employee productivity (Y).Samples were employees at mechanical division of PT Mulia Makmur Jalan Jababeka VIIIA Elektrikatama SFB Block B 11 V Cikarang Bekasi, sampling is done by random sampling. After examining the completed questionnaires that have been distributed to the employees and the calculation of the correlation between compensation and discipline against the labor productivity by using multiple regression calculations obtained: Y = 0.0102 + 0,2149X1 + 0,7998X2 with b1 = 0.2149 have meaning relationships compensation (X1) and productivity (Y) is positive and b2 = 0.7998 has meaning relations work discipline (X2) and productivity (Y) is positive. While the analysis results obtained using the calculation of multiple correlation R = 0.9113 and KPB = 83.05%, which means there is a very strong positive relationship between compensation and (X1) and discipline (X2) together to work productivity (Y) and 16.95% contribution comes from factors outside of this study. The F-test results showed Fhitung> Ftabel or 66.13%> 3.35, which means all of the independent variable (compensation = X1, X2 = work discipline) together there is a significant effect on work productivity variable (Y) on the mechanical PT Mulia Makmur Elektrikatama division.

Download Full-text

PENGARUH KETERAMPILAN TERHADAP PRODUKTIVITAS KERJA KARYAWAN PADA KONVEKSI ISTANA MODE MADIUN

EQUILIBRIUM Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi dan Pembelajarannya ◽

10.25273/equilibrium.v4i1.647 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 4 (1) ◽

pp. 96 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Wiwin Wiranti

Keyword(s):

Regression Analysis ◽

Data Collection ◽

Statistical Methods ◽

Significant Relationship ◽

Work Productivity ◽

Sampling Technique ◽

T Test ◽

Employee Productivity ◽

Test Results ◽

F Test

<p>This study aims to determine tbe Employee Skills in the Konveksi Istana Mode Madiun, to determine Employee Productivity in the Konveksi Istana Mode Madiun, as well as to determine the presence or absence of Vocational Effect on Productivity Among Employees at the Konveksi Istana Mode Madiun. The samples in this study is purposive sampling technique that all employees at the Konveksi Istana Mode Madiun part of convection, amounting to 30 people. Data collection using questionnaires, documentation and interviews.In analyzing the data using statistical methods Product Moment, To test this hypothesis using the r test, F test and t test. The results of the regression analysis ofY = a +bX, the result Y = 11,737 + 0,757X, to test that rcount > r liable (0.784 > 0.361), or may be rejected HO means that there is a skills significant relationship with work productivity of employee at the Konveksi Istana Mode Madiun. Furthermore, also obtained results which indicate that the F test ofF count >F table (44,5752::4.196) or ::;;Sighit Sigprob (0,000 ::;;0.05). Thus HO is rejected, it means there is an overall effect of skills on labor productivity at the Konveksi Istana Mode Madiun. In addition, the t-test results obtained thit> ttab (6.676 > 2.048) or Sig hit < Sig prob (0.000 < 0.025) this situation can be said to be no different from the effect of employee skills on work productivity of employee at the Konveksi Istana Mode Madiun.</p>

Download Full-text

LINGKUNGAN KERJA FISIK, LINGKUNGAN KERJA NON FISIK, DAN DISIPLIN KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA PEGAWAI GURU SMK NEGERI 1 MANOKWARI

Cakrawala Management Business Journal ◽

10.30862/cm-bj.v1i1.8 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 1 (1) ◽

pp. 119

Author(s):

Dewi Fitriani ◽

Nurlaela Nurlaela ◽

Dirarini Sudarwadi

Keyword(s):

Work Environment ◽

Employee Performance ◽

T Test ◽

Physical Work ◽

F Test ◽

Environment Variable ◽

Environment Variables ◽

Quantitative Data Analysis ◽

Physical Work Environment ◽

Saturated Sample

The research objective is to examine the effect of physical work environment, non-physical work environment and work discipline on employee performance. This type of research is quantitative. Data analysis using multiple linear regression, R2 test, t test, and F test. Respondents were teachers of SMK Negeri 1 Manokwari, using saturated sample techniques with a sample of 45 employees. The results showed that partially the physical work environment variable had no effect on performance, as evidenced by the results of the t test which showed a significance value greater than 0.05 (0.449), non-physical work environment variables did not affect performance as evidenced by the t test results indicating significant value greater than 0.05 (0.961) and the results of the t test on work discipline variables affect performance, as evidenced by a significant value smaller than 0.05 (0,000). Simultaneously that physical work environment, non physical work environment, work discipline have a significant effect on performance, as evidenced by the F test, a significant value of 0,000 is smaller than 0.05 (0,000).

Download Full-text

PENGARUH LINGKUNGAN KERJA DAN MOTIVASI KERJA TERHADAP PRODUKTIVITAS KERJA KARYAWAN JASA KONTRUKSI DI PT KADI INTERNATIONAL

Jurnal Manajemen & Bisnis Kreatif ◽

10.36805/manajemen.v5i2.1028 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 5 (2) ◽

pp. 27-34

Author(s):

Uus Mohammad Darul Fadli ◽

Enjang Suherman ◽

Ahmad Sobandi

Keyword(s):

Work Environment ◽

Work Motivation ◽

Work Productivity ◽

Research Approach ◽

Employee Productivity ◽

Frequency Scale ◽

Quantitative Descriptive ◽

Relationship Of ◽

The Relationship ◽

Positive Effect

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan lingkungan kerja, motivasi kerja,produktivitas kerja karyawan dan hubungan dari ketiga variabel tersebut di PT.Kadi International. Pendekatan penelitian menggunakan deskriptif kuantitatif. Datadikumpulkan dengan kuisioner kepada sampel dari 60 orang karyawan perusahaanyang bersedia dan diijinkan perusahaaan untuk diteliti, selanjutnya data dianalisismengunakan analisis frekuensi, analisis rentang skala dan analysis jalur (pathanalysis). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perusahaan memiliki lingkungankerja dengan modus yang baik, motivasi kerja karyawan yang tinggi serta memilikiproduktivitas karyawan yang tinggi pula. Korelasi lingkungan kerja dan motivasikerja karyawan sebesar 0,357 dan signifikan. Secara parsial lingkungan kerjaberpengaruh positif terhadap produktivitas sebesar 4 % (signifikan), sedangkanmotivasi kerja berpengaruh positif terhadap produktivitas kerja karyawan sebesar44% (signifikan). Secara simultan lingkungan kerja dan motivasi kerja berpengaruhpositif sebesar 58,1% terhadap produktivitas kerja karyawan di perusahaan tersebutdan sangat signifikan.Kata Kunci: lingkungan kerja, motivasi kerja, produktivitas kerja This study aims to explain the work environment, work motivation, employee workproductivity and the relationship of the three variables at PT. Kadi International.The research approach uses quantitative descriptive. Data were collected byquestionnaire to a sample of 60 company employees taken proportionally, then thedata were analyzed by frequency scale analysis and path analysis. The resultsshowed that the company has a good work environment, high employee motivationand high employee productivity. The correlation of work environment and employeemotivation is 0.357 and significant. Partially the work environment has a positiveeffect on productivity by .4% (significant), while work motivation has a positiveeffect on employee work productivity of 44% (significant),.Simultaneously the workenvironment and work motivation had a positive effect of 58,1% on the workproductivity of employees in the company and were very significant.Keywords: work environment, work motivation, work productivity

Download Full-text