scholarly journals Citizen rain gauge improves hourly radar rainfall bias correction using a two-step Kalman filter

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Punpim Puttaraksa Mapiam ◽  
Monton Methaprayun ◽  
Thom Bogaard ◽  
Gerrit Schoups ◽  
Marie-Claire Ten Veldhuis
Keyword(s):  
Kalman Filter ◽  
Bias Correction ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Rainfall Data ◽  
Spatial Density ◽  
Limiting Factor ◽  
Rainfall Time Series ◽  
Radar Rainfall ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Rain Gauge Network

Abstract. Low density of conventional rain gauge networks is often a limiting factor for radar rainfall bias correction. Citizen rain gauges offer a promising opportunity to collect rainfall data at higher spatial density. In this paper hourly radar rainfall bias adjustment was applied using two different rain gauge networks consisting of tipping buckets (measured by Thailand Meteorological Department, TMD) and daily citizen rain gauges in a two-step Kalman Filter approach. Radar reflectivity data of Sattahip radar station and gauge rainfall data from the TMD and citizen rain gauges located in Tubma basin, Thailand were used in the analysis. Daily data from the citizen rain gauge network were downscaled to hourly resolution based on temporal distribution patterns obtained from radar rainfall time series and the TMD gauge network. The radar rainfall bias correction factor was sequentially updated based on TMD and citizen rain gauge data using a Kalman Filter. Results show that an improvement of radar rainfall estimates was achieved by including the downscaled citizen observations compared to bias correction based on the conventional rain gauge network only. These outcomes emphasize the value of citizen rainfall observations for radar bias correction, in particular in regions where conventional rain gauge networks are sparse.

scholarly journals On precipitation measurements collected by a weather radar and a rain gauge network

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 605-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Sebastianelli ◽  
F. Russo ◽  
F. Napolitano ◽  
L. Baldini
Keyword(s):  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Rainfall Amount ◽  
Rainfall Time Series ◽  
Adjustment Factor ◽  
Radar Rainfall ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
R Ratio ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Layer Effect ◽  
One Year

Abstract. Many phenomena (such as attenuation and range degradation) can influence the accuracy of rainfall radar estimates. They introduce errors that increase as the distance from radar increases, thereby decreasing the reliability of radar estimates for applications that require quantitative precipitation estimation. The present paper evaluates radar error as a function of the range, in order to correct the rainfall radar estimates. The radar is calibrated utilizing data from the rain gauges. Then, the G/R ratio between the yearly rainfall amount measured in each rain gauge position during 2008 and the corresponding radar rainfall amount is calculated against the slant range. The trend of the G/R ratio shows two behaviours: a concave part due to the melting layer effect close to the radar location and an almost linear, increasing trend at greater distances. A best fitting line is used to find an adjustment factor, which estimates the radar error at a given range. The effectiveness of the methodology is verified by comparing pairs of rainfall time series that are observed simultaneously by collocated rain gauges and radar. Furthermore, the variability of the adjustment factor is investigated at the scale of event, both for convective and stratiform events. The main result is that there is not a univocal range error pattern, as it also depends on the characteristics of the considered event. On the other hand, the adjustment factor tends to stabilize itself for time aggregations of the order of one year or greater.

scholarly journals Radar subpixel-scale rainfall variability and uncertainty: lessons learned from observations of a dense rain-gauge network

2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 2195-2208 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Peleg ◽  
M. Ben-Asher ◽  
E. Morin
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Variability ◽  
Rainfall Variability ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Spatial And Temporal Variability ◽  
Radar Rainfall ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Daily Scale ◽  
Rain Gauge Network ◽  
Hydrological Applications

Abstract. Runoff and flash flood generation are very sensitive to rainfall's spatial and temporal variability. The increasing use of radar and satellite data in hydrological applications, due to the sparse distribution of rain gauges over most catchments worldwide, requires furthering our knowledge of the uncertainties of these data. In 2011, a new super-dense network of rain gauges containing 14 stations, each with two side-by-side gauges, was installed within a 4 km2 study area near Kibbutz Galed in northern Israel. This network was established for a detailed exploration of the uncertainties and errors regarding rainfall variability within a common pixel size of data obtained from remote sensing systems for timescales of 1 min to daily. In this paper, we present the analysis of the first year's record collected from this network and from the Shacham weather radar, located 63 km from the study area. The gauge–rainfall spatial correlation and uncertainty were examined along with the estimated radar error. The nugget parameter of the inter-gauge rainfall correlations was high (0.92 on the 1 min scale) and increased as the timescale increased. The variance reduction factor (VRF), representing the uncertainty from averaging a number of rain stations per pixel, ranged from 1.6% for the 1 min timescale to 0.07% for the daily scale. It was also found that at least three rain stations are needed to adequately represent the rainfall (VRF < 5%) on a typical radar pixel scale. The difference between radar and rain gauge rainfall was mainly attributed to radar estimation errors, while the gauge sampling error contributed up to 20% to the total difference. The ratio of radar rainfall to gauge-areal-averaged rainfall, expressed by the error distribution scatter parameter, decreased from 5.27 dB for 3 min timescale to 3.21 dB for the daily scale. The analysis of the radar errors and uncertainties suggest that a temporal scale of at least 10 min should be used for hydrological applications of the radar data. Rainfall measurements collected with this dense rain gauge network will be used for further examination of small-scale rainfall's spatial and temporal variability in the coming years.

scholarly journals Identification of the Optimum Rain Gauge Network Density for Hydrological Modelling Based on Radar Rainfall Analysis

Water ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1906
Author(s):  
Yeboah Gyasi-Agyei
Keyword(s):  
Scaling Laws ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Hydrological Modelling ◽  
Network Density ◽  
Sampled Data ◽  
Radar Rainfall ◽  
Rainfall Analysis ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Performance Statistics ◽  
Rain Gauge Network

Rain gauges continue to be sources of rainfall data despite progress made in precipitation measurements using radar and satellite technology. There has been some work done on assessing the optimum rain gauge network density required for hydrological modelling, but without consensus. This paper contributes to the identification of the optimum rain gauge network density, using scaling laws and bias-corrected 1 km × 1 km grid radar rainfall records, covering an area of 28,371 km2 that hosts 315 rain gauges in south-east Queensland, Australia. Varying numbers of radar pixels (rain gauges) were repeatedly sampled using a unique stratified sampling technique. For each set of rainfall sampled data, a two-dimensional correlogram was developed from the normal scores obtained through quantile-quantile transformation for ordinary kriging which is a stochastic interpolation. Leave-one-out cross validation was carried out, and the simulated quantiles were evaluated using the performance statistics of root-mean-square-error and mean-absolute-bias, as well as their rates of change. A break in the scaling of the plots of these performance statistics against the number of rain gauges was used to infer the optimum rain gauge network density. The optimum rain gauge network density varied from 14 km2/gauge to 38 km2/gauge, with an average of 25 km2/gauge.

scholarly journals A New Parameter to Assess Impact of Rain Gauge Density on Uncertainty in the Estimate of Monthly Rainfall over India

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 821-832 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satya Prakash ◽  
Ashwin Seshadri ◽  
J. Srinivasan ◽  
D. S. Pai
Keyword(s):  
Theoretical Model ◽  
Central India ◽  
Ground Truth ◽  
Accurate Method ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Monthly Rainfall ◽  
Spatial Density ◽  
Spatial Average ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Rainfall Estimates

Abstract Rain gauges are considered the most accurate method to estimate rainfall and are used as the “ground truth” for a wide variety of applications. The spatial density of rain gauges varies substantially and hence influences the accuracy of gridded gauge-based rainfall products. The temporal changes in rain gauge density over a region introduce considerable biases in the historical trends in mean rainfall and its extremes. An estimate of uncertainty in gauge-based rainfall estimates associated with the nonuniform layout and placement pattern of the rain gauge network is vital for national decisions and policy planning in India, which considers a rather tight threshold of rainfall anomaly. This study examines uncertainty in the estimation of monthly mean monsoon rainfall due to variations in gauge density across India. Since not all rain gauges provide measurements perpetually, we consider the ensemble uncertainty in spatial average estimation owing to randomly leaving out rain gauges from the estimate. A recently developed theoretical model shows that the uncertainty in the spatially averaged rainfall is directly proportional to the spatial standard deviation and inversely proportional to the square root of the total number of available gauges. On this basis, a new parameter called the “averaging error factor” has been proposed that identifies the regions with large ensemble uncertainties. Comparison of the theoretical model with Monte Carlo simulations at a monthly time scale using rain gauge observations shows good agreement with each other at all-India and subregional scales. The uncertainty in monthly mean rainfall estimates due to omission of rain gauges is largest for northeast India (~4% uncertainty for omission of 10% gauges) and smallest for central India. Estimates of spatial average rainfall should always be accompanied by a measure of uncertainty, and this paper provides such a measure for gauge-based monthly rainfall estimates. This study can be further extended to determine the minimum number of rain gauges necessary for any given region to estimate rainfall at a certain level of uncertainty.

scholarly journals Influence of the rain gauge network on the performance of a hydrological lumped model applied at different basin scales

RBRH ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefany Correia de Paula ◽  
Rutineia Tassi ◽  
Daniel Gustavo Allasia Piccilli ◽  
Francisco Lorenzini Neto
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Distribution ◽  
Monitoring Network ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Network Density ◽  
Low Density ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Lumped Model ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
The Poor ◽  
Rain Gauge Network

ABSTRACT In this study was evaluated the influence of the rainfall monitoring network density and distribution on the result of rainfall-runoff daily simulations of a lumped model (IPH II) considering basins with different drainage scales: Turvo River (1,540 km2), Ijuí River (9,462 km2), Jacuí River (38,700 km2) and Upper Uruguay (61,900 km2). For this purpose, four rain gauge coverage scenarios were developed: (I) 100%; (II) 75%; (III) 50% and (IV) 25% of the rain gauges of the basin. Additionally, a scenario considering the absence of monitoring was evaluated, in which the rainfall used in the modeling was estimated based on the TRMM satellite. Was verified that, in some situations, the modeling produced better results for scenarios with a lower rain gauges density if the available gauges presented better spatial distribution. Comparatively to the simulations performed with the rainfall estimated by the TRMM, the results obtained using rain gauges’ data were better, even in scenarios with low rain gauges density. However, when the poor spatial distribution of the rain gauges was associated with low density, the satellite’s estimation provided better results. Thus, was conclude that spatial distribution of the rain gauge network is important in the rainfall representation and that estimates obtained by the TRMM can be presented as alternatives for basins with a deficient monitoring network.

scholarly journals Validation of TRMM 3B42V7 Rainfall Product under Complex Topographic and Climatic Conditions over Hexi Region in the Northwest Arid Region of China

Water ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiuna Wang ◽  
Yongjian Ding ◽  
Chuancheng Zhao ◽  
Jian Wang
Keyword(s):  
Bias Correction ◽  
Arid Region ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Climatic Conditions ◽  
Monthly Precipitation ◽  
Observation Data ◽  
Precipitation Data ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Hexi Region ◽  
Precipitation Events

Continuous and accurate spatiotemporal precipitation data plays an important role in regional climate and hydrology research, particularly in the arid inland regions where rain gauges are sparse and unevenly distributed. The main objective of this study is to evaluate and bias-correct the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) 3B42V7 rainfall product under complex topographic and climatic conditions over the Hexi region in the northwest arid region of China with the reference of rain gauge observation data during 2009–2015. A series of statistical indicators were adopted to quantitatively evaluate the error of 3B42V7 and its ability in detecting precipitation events. Overall, the 3B42V7 overestimates the precipitation with Bias of 11.16%, and its performance generally becomes better with the increasing of time scale. The agreements between the rain gauge data and 3B42V7 are very low in cold season, and moderate in warm season. The 3B42V7 shows better correlation with rain gauges located in the southern mountainous and central oasis areas than in the northern extreme arid regions, and is more likely to underestimate the precipitation in high-altitude mountainous areas and overestimate the precipitation in low-elevation regions. The distribution of the error on the daily scale is more related to the elevation and rainfall than in monthly and annual scale. The 3B42V7 significantly overestimates the precipitation events, and the overestimation mainly focuses on tiny amounts of rainfall (0–1 mm/d), which is also the range of false alarm concentration. Bias correction for 3B42V7 was carried out based on the deviation of the average monthly precipitation data during 2009–2015. The bias-corrected 3B42V7 was significantly improved compared with the original product. Results suggest that regional assessment and bias correction of 3B42V7 rainfall product are of vital importance and will provide substantive reference for regional hydrological studies.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Satellite Based Precipitations and Their Applicability for Rainfall Runoff Modelling in Narayani Basin of Nepal

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunil Ghaju ◽  
Knut Alfredsen
Keyword(s):  
Bias Correction ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Extensive Study ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Runoff Simulation ◽  
Satellite Precipitation ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Set Up ◽  
Rain Gauge Network ◽  
Precipitation Station

High spatial variability of precipitation over Nepal demands dense network of rain-gauge stations. But to set-up a dense rain gauge network is almost impossible due to mountainous topography of Nepal. Also the dense rain gauge network will be very expensive and some time impossible for timely maintenance. Satellite precipitation products are an alternative way to collect precipitation data with high temporal and spatial resolution over Nepal. In this study, the satellite precipitation products TRMM and GSMaP were analyzed. Precipitation was compared with ground based gauge precipitation in the Narayani basin, while the applicability of these rainfall products for runoff simulation were tested using the LANDPINE model for Trishuli basin which is a sub-basin within Narayani catchment. The Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency calculated for TRMM and GSMaP from point to pixel comparison is negative for most of stations. Also the estimation bias for both the products is negative indicating under estimation of precipitation by satellite products, with least under estimation for the GSMaP precipitation product. After point to pixel comparison, satellite precipitation estimates were used for runoff simulation in the Trishuli catchment with and without bias correction for each product. Among the two products, TRMM shows good simulation result without any bias correction for calibration and validation period with scaling factor of 2.24 for precipitation which is higher than that for gauge precipitation. This suggests, it could be used for runoff simulation to the catchments where there is no precipitation station. But it is too early to conclude by just looking into one catchment. So extensive study need to be done to make such conclusion.Journal of Hydrology and Meteorology, Vol. 8(1) p.22-31

scholarly journals Time-dependent <i>Z-R</i> relationships for estimating rainfall fields from radar measurements

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Alfieri ◽  
P. Claps ◽  
F. Laio
Keyword(s):  
Time Estimation ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Rainfall Rate ◽  
Time Step ◽  
Radar Rainfall ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Weather Radars ◽  
The North ◽  
Real Time Estimation ◽  
Power Law Equation

Abstract. The operational use of weather radars has become a widespread and useful tool for estimating rainfall fields. The radar-gauge adjustment is a commonly adopted technique which allows one to reduce bias and dispersion between radar rainfall estimates and the corresponding ground measurements provided by rain gauges. This paper investigates a new methodology for estimating radar-based rainfall fields by recalibrating at each time step the reflectivity-rainfall rate (Z-R) relationship on the basis of ground measurements provided by a rain gauge network. The power-law equation for converting reflectivity measurements into rainfall rates is readjusted at each time step, by calibrating its parameters using hourly Z-R pairs collected in the proximity of the considered time step. Calibration windows with duration between 1 and 24 h are used for estimating the parameters of the Z-R relationship. A case study pertaining to 19 rainfall events occurred in the north-western Italy is considered, in an area located within 25 km from the radar site, with available measurements of rainfall rate at the ground and radar reflectivity aloft. Results obtained with the proposed method are compared to those of three other literature methods. Applications are described for a posteriori evaluation of rainfall fields and for real-time estimation. Results suggest that the use of a calibration window of 2–5 h yields the best performances, with improvements that reach the 28% of the standard error obtained by using the most accurate fixed (climatological) Z-R relationship.

scholarly journals Improved input to distributed hydrologic model in areas with sparse subdaily rainfall data using multivariate daily rainfall disaggregation

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 784-797 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marija Ivković ◽  
Andrijana Todorović ◽  
Jasna Plavšić
Keyword(s):  
Daily Rainfall ◽  
Flood Forecasting ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Hydrologic Model ◽  
Rainfall Data ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Observation Network ◽  
Hourly Rainfall ◽  
Extreme Flood ◽  
Flood Simulations

Abstract Flood forecasting relies on good quality of observed and forecasted rainfall. In Serbia, the recording rain gauge network is sparse and rainfall data mainly come from dense non-recording rain gauges. This is not beneficial for flood forecasting in smaller catchments and short-duration events, when hydrologic models operating on subdaily scale are applied. Moreover, differences in rainfall amounts from two types of gauges can be considerable, which is common in operational hydrological practice. This paper examines the possibility of including daily rainfall data from dense observation networks in flood forecasting based on subdaily data, using the extreme flood event in the Kolubara catchment in May 2014 as a case study. Daily rainfall from a dense observation network is disaggregated to hourly scale using the MuDRain multivariate disaggregation software. The disaggregation procedure results in well-reproduced rainfall dynamics and adjusts rainfall volume to the values from the non-recording gauges. The fully distributed wflow_hbv model, which is under development as a forecasting tool for the Kolubara catchment, is used for flood simulations with two alternative hourly rainfall data. The results show an improvement when the disaggregated rainfall from denser network is used, thus indicating the significance of better representation of rainfall temporal and spatial variability for flood forecasting.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the High-Resolution CMORPH Satellite Rainfall Product Using Dense Rain Gauge Observations and Radar-Based Estimates

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1784-1798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emad Habib ◽  
Alemseged Tamiru Haile ◽  
Yudong Tian ◽  
Robert J. Joyce
Keyword(s):  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Random Errors ◽  
Event Scale ◽  
Entire Study ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Fine Resolution ◽  
Rain Rates ◽  
Climate Prediction Center ◽  
Rain Gauge Network ◽  
Insight Into

Abstract This study focuses on the evaluation of the NOAA–NCEP Climate Prediction Center (CPC) morphing technique (CMORPH) satellite-based rainfall product at fine space–time resolutions (1 h and 8 km). The evaluation was conducted during a 28-month period from 2004 to 2006 using a high-quality experimental rain gauge network in southern Louisiana, United States. The dense arrangement of rain gauges allowed for multiple gauges to be located within a single CMORPH pixel and provided a relatively reliable approximation of pixel-average surface rainfall. The results suggest that the CMORPH product has high detection skills: the probability of successful detection is ~80% for surface rain rates &gt;2 mm h−1 and probability of false detection &lt;3%. However, significant and alarming missed-rain and false-rain volumes of 21% and 22%, respectively, were reported. The CMORPH product has a negligible bias when assessed for the entire study period. On an event scale it has significant biases that exceed 100%. The fine-resolution CMORPH estimates have high levels of random errors; however, these errors get reduced rapidly when the estimates are aggregated in time or space. To provide insight into future improvements, the study examines the effect of temporal availability of passive microwave rainfall estimates on the product accuracy. The study also investigates the implications of using a radar-based rainfall product as an evaluation surface reference dataset instead of gauge observations. The findings reported in this study guide future enhancements of rainfall products and increase their informed usage in a variety of research and operational applications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document