scholarly journals Efficiency of coronavirus inactivation on environmental surfaces: A comparison study of two available disinfectants

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Kelli L. Barr ◽  
Shannon E. Ronca ◽  
Rodney X. Sturdivant ◽  
Debra D. Harris
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Peroxide ◽  
Contact Time ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Comparison Study ◽  
Disinfection Methods ◽  
Food And Agriculture ◽  
Quaternary Compounds ◽  
Environmental Surfaces ◽  
Medical Facilities ◽  
Environmental Surface

Background: There are many coronaviruses of significant medical and veterinary concern, all of which are the result of spillover from another species. Disinfection of healthcare and veterinary environments is an important factor in limiting the transmission of coronaviruses. Disinfection agents for coronaviruses use bleach, quaternary compounds, hydrogen peroxide, and sodium hydroxide. Product labels list contact times that range from 10-30 minutes for total inactivation. Decon7 is a combination disinfectant that is currently used in the food and agriculture, medical facilities, and other industries. While Decon7 has been shown to inactivate a variety of pathogens and disrupt biofilms, its effectiveness and rate of coronavirus inactivation has not been evaluated.Objective: This project sought to evaluate Decon7’s effectiveness and rate of coronavirus inactivation.Methods: This study evaluated the disinfection efficacy of Decon7 (diluted at 1:4) and bleach (diluted at 1:10) after 3 coronaviruses (SARS-CoV-2, HCoV OC43, and HCoV NL63) were inoculated onto up to sixteen environmental surface materials.Results: A 1:4 dilution of Decon7 inactivated all coronaviruses on all surfaces with 1 minute contact time. A 1:10 dilution of bleach was not effective in inactivating coronaviruses with a contact time of 1 minute on all surfaces.Conclusions: New technologies and chemistries may offer more efficient inactivation of pathogens on environmental surfaces. These disinfection methods and materials, which require less than 10 minutes contact time, may improve the efficacy of cleaning and disinfecting surfaces in the built environment.

scholarly journals Comparative Validation Study to Demonstrate the Equivalence of a Minor Modification to AOAC Method 997.03 [Visual Immunoprecipitate (VIP®) for Listeria] to the Reference Culture Methods

2008 ◽  
Vol 91 (2) ◽  
pp. 365-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip T Feldsine ◽  
David E Kerr ◽  
George S Shen ◽  
Andrew H Lienau
Keyword(s):  
Official Method ◽  
Comparison Study ◽  
Culture Methods ◽  
Environmental Surfaces ◽  
Environmental Surface ◽  
Aoac Method ◽  
Aoac Official ◽  
A Minor ◽  
Comparative Validation ◽  
Aoac Official Method

Abstract The Visual Immunoprecipitate (VIP®) for the Detection of Listeria in Foods and Environmental Surfaces, AOAC Official Method 997.03, has been modified to use a simplified housing for the device. A methods comparison study was conducted to demonstrate the equivalence of this modification to the reference culture methods. Two food matrixes and one environmental surface were analyzed. In total, valid results were obtained from 145 samples and controls. Results showed that the modified VIP for Listeria spp. is equivalent to the reference culture methods for the detection of Listeria.

scholarly journals Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A virus by spraying hypochlorous acid solution and hydrogen peroxide solution in the form of Dry Fog

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Urushidani ◽  
Akira Kawayoshi ◽  
Tomohiro Kotaki ◽  
Keiichi Saeki ◽  
Yasuko Mori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Peroxide ◽  
Influenza Virus ◽  
Acid Solution ◽  
Influenza A Virus ◽  
Influenza A ◽  
Hypochlorous Acid ◽  
Test Chamber ◽  
Hydrogen Peroxide Solution ◽  
Environmental Surfaces ◽  
Environmental Surface

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), is transmitted by droplet and contact infection. SARS-CoV-2 that adheres to environmental surfaces remains infectious for several days. We herein attempted to inactivate SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A virus adhering to an environmental surface by spraying aerosolized hypochlorous acid solution and hydrogen peroxide solution in the form of Dry Fog (fog that does not wet objects even if touched). SARS-CoV-2 and influenza virus were dried on plastic plates and placed into a test chamber for inactivation by the Dry Fog spraying of disinfectants. The results obtained showed that Dry Fog spraying inactivated SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A virus in time- and exposed disinfectant amount-dependent manners. SARS-CoV-2 was more resistant to the virucidal effects of aerosolized hypochlorous acid solution and hydrogen peroxide solution than influenza A virus; therefore, higher concentrations of spray solutions were required to inactivate SARS-CoV-2 than influenza A virus. The present results provide important information for the development of a strategy that inactivates SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A virus on environmental surfaces by spatial spraying.

scholarly journals Validation Study to Demonstrate the Equivalence of a Minor Modification of Assurance Enzyme Immunoassay Method, Official Method 996.14, for Detection of Listeria in Foods and Environmental Surfaces to the Reference Culture Methods

2008 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-163
Author(s):  
Philip T Feldsine ◽  
David E Kerr ◽  
Andrew H Lienau
Keyword(s):  
Enzyme Immunoassay ◽  
Conjugate Addition ◽  
Official Method ◽  
Comparison Study ◽  
Culture Methods ◽  
Environmental Surfaces ◽  
Environmental Surface ◽  
Aoac Official ◽  
A Minor ◽  
Aoac Official Method

Abstract The Assurance Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) for the Detection of Listeria in Foods and Environmental Surfaces, AOAC Official Method 996.14, has been modified to combine the separate antibody and conjugate addition steps into one. A methods comparison study was conducted to demonstrate the equivalence of this modification to the reference culture methods. Two food matrixes and one environmental surface were analyzed. In total, there were valid results from 145 samples and controls. Results showed that the Assurance EIA for Listeria spp. is equivalent to the reference culture methods for the detection of Listeria.

scholarly journals Comparison of Two Novel Methods for Sink Drain Disinfection

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s180-s180
Author(s):  
Muhammed Fawwaz Haq ◽  
Lucas Jones ◽  
Natalia Pinto Herrera ◽  
Jennifer Cadnum ◽  
Philip Carling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Contact Time ◽  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Disinfection Methods ◽  
Initial Reduction ◽  
Repeated Measures Analysis ◽  
Potential Reservoir ◽  
Cleaning And Disinfection

Background: Sink drainage systems are a potential reservoir for the dissemination of gram-negative bacilli but are not amenable to standard methods of cleaning and disinfection. Pouring liquid disinfectants down drains has only a limited and transient effect on drain colonization, presumably due to inadequate disinfectant contact time and suboptimal penetration into areas harboring biofilm-associated organisms. Methods: We compared the antimicrobial efficacy of 2 novel sink disinfection methods intended to enhance disinfectant contact time and penetration. Healthcare facility sinks were randomly assigned to disinfection with 300 mL hydrogen peroxide-based disinfectant applied either as a foam (N = 13 sinks) or instilled for 30 minutes behind a temporary obstruction created by an inflated urinary catheter balloon (N = 12 sinks). Swabs were used to collect quantitative cultures from the proximal sink drain to depth of 2.5 cm (1 inch) below the strainer before treatment and at 15 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 days after treatment. Repeated measures analysis of variance was performed to compare the efficacy of the 2 treatments. Results: As shown in Fig. 1, both methods yielded an initial reduction of >3 log10 CFU of gram-negative bacilli. Over the 7-day follow-up period, disinfectant instillation resulted in significantly greater reduction than the foam application (P < .01). Recovery of sink colonization to >2 log per swab occurred at day 3 for both treatments, whereas recovery to >3 log per swab occurred on day 3 for the foam treatment versus day 7 for disinfectant instillation. Conclusions: Two novel disinfection methods were effective in reducing sink drain colonization for several days. The instillation method was more effective than the foam method in maintaining reductions over 7 days.Funding: NoneDisclosures: NoneDisclosures: NoneFunding: None

Control of 2-Methylisoborneol and Geosmin by Ozone and Peroxone: A Pilot Study

1992 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Koch ◽  
J. T. Gramith ◽  
M. S. Dale ◽  
D. W. Ferguson
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Peroxide ◽  
Ferrous Sulfate ◽  
Contact Time ◽  
Pilot Scale ◽  
Ozone Dose ◽  
Ammonia Addition ◽  
Removal Efficiencies ◽  
Odorous Compounds ◽  
Water District ◽  
Percent Removal

A pilot-scale study of ozone and PEROXONE (ozone in combination with hydrogen peroxide) for the removal of the odorous compounds 2-methylisoborneol (MIB) and geosmin in drinking water has been conducted at the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. The study investigated the effects of ozone dosage, ratio of hydrogen peroxide to ozone (H202/03), and contact time. It was found that MIB and geosmin removal increased with higher applied ozone doses, but longer contact times over the range of 6-12 min were not significant. It was determined that 80-90 percent removal could be achieved with an ozone dose of approximately 4.0 mg/l, as compared to an ozone dose of approximately 2.0 mg/l at a H202/03 ratio of 0.2. Also investigated were the effects of alternative contactor configurations, ferrous sulfate as an alternative coagulant, bromide and ammonia addition, and simulated turbidity on the removal efficiencies of the two odorous compounds.

A Head-to-Head Comparison of Hydrogen Peroxide Vapor and Aerosol Room Decontamination Systems

2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 831-836 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Holmdahl ◽  
P. Lanbeck ◽  
M. Wullt ◽  
M. H. Walder
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Peroxide ◽  
Cycle Time ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Biological Indicators ◽  
The Other ◽  
Test Room ◽  
Cycle Times ◽  
Hydrogen Peroxide Vapor ◽  
In Vitro Comparison

Objective.New technologies have emerged in recent years for the disinfection of hospital rooms and equipment that may not be disinfected adequately using conventional methods. There are several hydrogen peroxide–based area decontamination technologies on the market, but no head-to-head studies have been performed.Design.We conducted a head-to-head in vitro comparison of a hydrogen peroxide vapor (HPV) system (Bioquell) and an aerosolized hydrogen peroxide (aHP) system (Sterinis).Setting.The tests were conducted in a purpose-built 136-m3test room.Methods.One HPV generator and 2 aHP machines were used, following recommendations of the manufacturers. Three repeated tests were performed for each system. The microbiological efficacy of the 2 systems was tested using 6-log Tyvek-pouchedGeobacillus stearo-thermophilusbiological indicators (BIs). The indicators were placed at 20 locations in the first test and 14 locations in the subsequent 2 tests for each system.Results.All BIs were inactivated for the 3 HPV tests, compared with only 10% in the first aHP test and 79% in the other 2 aHP tests. The peak hydrogen peroxide concentration was 338 ppm for HPV and 160 ppm for aHP. The total cycle time (including aeration) was 3 and 3.5 hours for the 3 HPV tests and the 3 aHP tests, respectively. Monitoring around the perimeter of the enclosure with a handheld sensor during tests of both systems did not identify leakage.Conclusion.One HPV generator was more effective than 2 aHP machines for the inactivation ofG. stearothermophilusBIs, and cycle times were faster for the HPV system.

scholarly journals Decomposition of Cyanide from Gold Leaching Tailingsby Using Sodium Metabisulphite and Hydrogen Peroxide

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Dongzhuang Hou ◽  
Lang Liu ◽  
Qixing Yang ◽  
Bo Zhang ◽  
Huafu Qiu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Peroxide ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Contact Time ◽  
Synergetic Effect ◽  
Economic Conditions ◽  
Gold Mine ◽  
Optimal Conditions ◽  
Gold Leaching ◽  
Sodium Metabisulphite ◽  
To Come

Cyanidation is widely used by most gold mine worldwide and will remain prevail in years (or decades) to come, while cyanide is hazardous, toxic pollutants whose presence in wastewater and tailings can seriously affect human and its environment; hence, it is necessary to control these contaminants. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects through the investigation of changes in pH, concentration, and contact time, and the optimal conditions were obtained. It has been proven that the decomposition of cyanide in solution and tailings increased as the alkalinity in the presence of 0.5 g/L Na2S2O5. An increase in H2O2 (30%) concentration (from 1 to 4 mL/L) increased the decomposition in solution, while the effect on removing cyanide was better when pH was 9 than 8 and 10 in tailings. The cyanide in tailings decreased in the first 4 h and increased after 4 h. The effective and economic conditions for maximum decomposition of cyanide from leach tailings are first treated in 0.5 g/L Na2S2O5 at pH 10 for 3 hours and then 2 mL/L H2O2 (30%) is added to the tailings at pH 9 for 4 hours through comparative study. The findings provide the basis to optimize the decomposition of cyanide from gold leaching tailings in mining or backfilling by using the synergetic effect of Na2S2O5 and H2O2.

scholarly journals 1242. Quantitative Analysis of Microbial Burden on LTCF Environmental Surfaces

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S378-S378
Author(s):  
Lauren DiBiase ◽  
Amy Powell ◽  
Maria Gergen ◽  
David J Weber ◽  
Emily E Sickbert-Bennett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Analysis ◽  
Strong Predictor ◽  
Drug Resistant ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Bacterial Colony ◽  
Environmental Surfaces ◽  
Colony Forming Units ◽  
Environmental Surface ◽  
Colonization Status

Abstract Background There is a lack of data on environmental surface contamination in long-term care facilities (LTCF), despite multiple reports of outbreaks of multi-drug-resistant organisms in these settings. Therefore, we conducted a quantitative analysis of the microbial burden and prevalence of epidemiologically important pathogens (EIP) found on LTCF environmental surfaces. Methods Microbiological samples were collected using Rodac plates from resident rooms and common areas in five LTCFs. At each facility, five samples from up to 10 different available environmental surfaces were collected from a room of a resident reported to be colonized with EIP, as well as from a room of a resident reported to be non-colonized. In addition, five samples from up to 10 different environmental surfaces were collected from two common areas in the facility. EIPs were defined as MRSA, VRE, C. difficile and multi-drug-resistant Gram negative bacilli. Data were analyzed for each environmental site sampled in a resident room or common area based on total bacterial colony forming units (CFU), mean CFU per Rodac, total EIP by site, and mean EIP counts per Rodac. Results The below table summarizes total EIP recovered from environmental sites by reported EIP colonization status of the resident. Rooms of residents with reported colonization had much greater EIP counts per Rodac (8.32, 95% CI 8.05, 8.60) than rooms of non-colonized residents (0.78, 95% CI 0.70, 0.86). MRSA was the most common EIP recovered from Rodacs, followed by C. difficile. Very few EIPs were recovered from the common areas sampled at these LTCFs. Conclusion We found varying levels of CFU and EIP on environmental sites at LTCFs. Colonization status of a resident was a strong predictor of higher levels of EIP being recovered from his/her room. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Tacoma controls tastes and odours with ozone

2007 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 137-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Carlson ◽  
T. Chen ◽  
C. McMeen ◽  
I.H. Suffet ◽  
M. Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Peroxide ◽  
Analytical Methods ◽  
Contact Time ◽  
Solid Phase Microextraction ◽  
Solid Phase ◽  
First Order ◽  
Ozone Dose ◽  
Gorge Reservoir ◽  
Flavour Profile ◽  
As Solid Phase

The study is focussed on the conditions that would provide the best ozone oxidation to decrease the taste and odour of the water from Eagle Gorge Reservoir. This study incorporated advanced analytical methods, such as solid phase microextraction (SPME) and flavour profile analyses (FPA), to evaluate the best method for improving taste and odour. The study developed first-order relationships between ozone dose and the oxidation of several taste and odour compounds. The results focussed on the importance and interactions between ozone dose, pH, hydrogen peroxide and contact time.

3M™ Petrifilm™ Environmental Listeria Plate

2013 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
DeAnn L Benesh ◽  
Erin S Crowley ◽  
Patrick M Bird
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Sampling Area ◽  
Plate Method ◽  
Inoculum Level ◽  
Environmental Surfaces ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Environmental Surface ◽  
High Level ◽  
Health Canada

Abstract A validation study of the 3M™ Petrifilm™ Environmental Listeria (EL) Plate (3M Food Safety, St. Paul, MN) was conducted at Q Laboratories, Inc., Cincinnati, OH. The method was compared to the Health Canada MFHPB-30 reference method for the analysis of stainless steel environmental surfaces. Twenty replicates of the environmental surface were analyzed at a low and a high inoculum level. The low-level sampling area was inoculated with 0.2–2 CFU/5 cm2, and the high-level sampling area was inoculated with 2–5 CFU/5 cm2. Five control replicates were also analyzed at 0 CFU/5 cm2. There was no significant difference in the number of positives detected by the 3M Petrifilm EL Plate method and the Health Canada MFHPB-30 reference method for the environmental surface analyzed in this study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document