scholarly journals Motor expertise and performance in sport-specific priming tasks: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PeerJ ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. e11243
Author(s):  
Ruichen Jiang ◽  
Fei Xie ◽  
Anmin Li
Keyword(s):  
Publication Bias ◽  
Random Effects ◽  
Stimulus Type ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
China National Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Prime Stimulus ◽  
Motor Expertise ◽  
Sport Type ◽  
Specific Priming

Objective The present study aimed to summarize findings relevant to the influence of motor expertise on performance in sport-specific priming tasks and to examine potential moderators of this effect. Methodology Data were collected from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), PsychInfo, Medline, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Baidu Scholar and Sport Discus and Dissertation Abstracts Online databases from January 1999 to April 2020, supplemented by manual bibliographies and meeting minutes. Stata software was used to perform the meta-analysis. Study quality was evaluated systematically using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). Standard mean differences (SMDs) with 95% CIs were calculated with a random-effects model. The Cochrane Q test and I2 statistic were used to evaluate heterogeneity. Begg funnel plots and Egger tests were conducted to assess publication bias. Results Nine articles (including 12 studies) were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. Significant heterogeneity was observed among these studies (Q = 44.42, P < 0.001, I2 = 75.2%) according to random-effects modeling. The results showed an overall advantage in favor of motor experts in sport-specific priming tasks (SMD = −1.01, 95% CI [−1.41 to −0.61]). However, the magnitude of that effect was moderated by sport type (interceptive sports/independent sports) and prime stimulus type (subliminal stimulus/supraliminal stimulus). No publication bias was detected by the Begg and Egger tests. Conclusions In general, compared with those of nonexperts, the responses of motor experts’ responses to a target stimulus are easier and faster when the prime and target stimuli are consistent. However, the magnitude of this effect is moderated by sport type and prime stimulus type.

Abstract 14339: Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and the Risk of Clinical Cardiovascular Events: A Meta-Analysis

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Toufik Mahfood Haddad ◽  
Shadi Hamdeh ◽  
Mahesh Anantha Narayanan ◽  
Arun Kanmanthareddy ◽  
Venkata M Alla
Keyword(s):  
Liver Disease ◽  
Fatty Liver ◽  
Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease ◽  
Publication Bias ◽  
Fatty Liver Disease ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver

Background: Numerous studies have assessed the association of Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) withcardiovascular disease (CVD). However, results have been conflicting due to variability in definitionsof NAFLD and ascertainment of CVD, often combining clinical and surrogate endpoints. We therefore systematically reviewed published literature to assess the association between NAFLD and clinical cardiovascular events. Methods: We searched Medline, Cochrane, google scholar, CINAHL, and Web of Sciencedatabasesusing terms “nonalcoholic fatty liver disease”, “cardiovascular disease”, and their combinations to identify studies published through March 2015. Data from selected studies was extracted and meta-analysis was then performed using Random effects model following the PRISMA guidelines. Publication bias and heterogeneity wereassessed. The main outcome measure was Odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI. Clinical CVD was defined as symptomatic coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, coronary or peripheral intervention, ischemic stroke, and symptomatic peripheral vascular disease. Results: A total of 7 studies with 14634 patients (NAFLD: 4204; controls: 10430) were included in the final analysis. 3 studies were cross- sectional reporting prevalence, while 4 studies were prospective cohort studies reporting incidence. Patients with NAFLD had a significantly higher risk of clinical CVD compared to controls [OR: 3.17; 95% CI: 1.89-5.30, P<0.01) (figure 1A). There was significant heterogeneity (I2=93%). Funnel plot and Begg’s test did not reveal significant publication bias. Separate analyses of the cohort and cross sectional studies and exclusion sensitivity analysis did not alter the findings (figure 1B). Conclusion: NAFLD is associated with a three fold increase in the risk of clinical CVD compared to controls without NAFLD. These results need to be conformed in large prospective studies.

The prevalence and progression of mild cognitive impairment among clinic and community populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 1595-1608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengping Hu ◽  
Donghai Yu ◽  
Xirong Sun ◽  
Ming Zhang ◽  
Lin Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Mild Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Publication Bias ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Disease Rate ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Reversion Rate ◽  
Age And Gender ◽  
And Gender

ABSTRACTBackground:It has been reported that up to 42% of the population aged over 60 are affected by mild cognitive impairment (MCI) worldwide. This study aims to investigate the prevalence and progression of MCI through a meta-analysis.Methods:We searched Embase and PubMed for relevant literature. Stable disease rate (SR), reversion rate (RR), dementia rate (DR), and Alzheimer's disease rate (AR) were used to evaluate the progression of MCI. The prevalence and progression rates were both obtained by reported percentile and indirect data analysis. Additionally, we carried out sensitivity analysis of each index by excluding some studies due to influence analysis with the most publication bias.Results:Effect size (ES) was used to present adjusted overall prevalence (16%) and progression rates including SR (45%), RR (15%), DR (34%), and AR (28%) of MCI. Compared with clinic-based outcomes, MCI prevalence, SR, and RR are significantly higher in community, while DR and AR are lower. Despite significant heterogeneity found among the studies, no publication bias was observed.Conclusions:Age and gender were observed to be associated with MCI, in which age was considered as an impact factor for DR. The strong heterogeneity may result from variations in study design and baselines. Standardized MCI criteria were suggested to systematically evaluate MCI in the future.

The Clinical Effects of Abdominal Binder on Abdominal Surgery: A Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 155335062097482
Author(s):  
Nanhui Jiang ◽  
Bihai Hao ◽  
Rong Huang ◽  
Fengying Rao ◽  
Ping Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Publication Bias ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Large Sample Size ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Clinical Effects ◽  
Clinical Value ◽  
Standard Mean Difference ◽  
Symptom Distress Scale ◽  
Distress Scale

Objective. We conducted a meta-analysis to quantitatively evaluate the effects of abdominal binder in abdominal surgeries. Methods. Through literature retrieval in globally recognized databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central), trials investigating the application of abdominal binder in abdominal surgeries were systematically reviewed. The main outcomes, namely, 6-minute walk test (6MWT), visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, and symptom distress scale (SDS) score, were pooled to make an overall estimation. I2 index was calculated to identify heterogeneity, and sensitivity analysis was performed to validate the stability of main results and explore the source of heterogeneity. A funnel plot and Egger’s test were applied to assess publication bias. Results. Ten randomized controlled trials consisting of 968 subjects were ultimately included for the pooled estimation. Abdominal binder significantly increased the distance of 6MWT with standard mean difference (SMD) of .555 ( P < .001) and decreased the scores of VAS and SDS with SMD of −.979 ( P < .001) and −.716 ( P < .001), respectively. Despite of the significant heterogeneity indicated by I2 index statistic, the results of sensitivity analysis revealed the reliability of the main conclusions. While we identified no obvious publication bias regarding 6MWT (Egger’s test P = .321), it seemed that significant publication biases existed with respect to the estimation of VAS ( P < .001) and SDS ( P = .006). Conclusion. The current meta-analysis verified that abdominal binder efficiently promoted recovery after abdominal surgeries in terms of facilitating mobilization, alleviating pain, and reducing postoperative distress. More rigorously designed clinical trials with large sample size are expected to further elaborate its clinical value.

scholarly journals The association between lithium in drinking water and neuropsychiatric outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis from across 2678 regions containing 113 million

2020 ◽  
pp. 000486742096374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brenton Eyre-Watt ◽  
Eesharnan Mahendran ◽  
Shuichi Suetani ◽  
Joseph Firth ◽  
Steve Kisely ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Drinking Water ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Publication Bias ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Suicide Rates ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Trim And Fill

Background: Lithium in drinking water may have significant mental health benefits. We investigated the evidence on the association between lithium concentrations in drinking water and their neuropsychiatric outcomes. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis and searched Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO and CINAHL up to 19 January 2020, for peer-reviewed research examining the association between lithium concentrations in drinking water and neuropsychiatric outcomes. We used a pairwise analysis and a random effects model to meta-analyse suicide rates and psychiatric hospital admissions. We assessed for publication bias using Egger’s test and Duval and Tweedie’s Trim and Fill analysis. Results: Twenty-seven studies including 113 million subjects were included in this systematic review. Meta-analysis of 14 studies including 94 million people found higher lithium concentrations were associated with reduced suicide rates ( r = −0.191, 95% confidence interval = [−0.287, −0.090], p < 0.001) and meta-analysis of two studies including 5 million people found higher lithium concentrations were associated with fewer hospital admissions ( r = −0.413, 95% confidence interval = [−0.689, −0.031], p = 0.035). We found significant heterogeneity between studies ( Q = 67.4, p < 0.001, I2 = 80.7%) and the presence of publication bias (Egger’s test; t value = 2.90, p = 0.013). Other included studies did not provide sufficient data to analyse other neuropsychiatric outcomes quantitatively. Conclusion: Higher lithium concentrations in drinking water may be associated with reduced suicide rates and inpatient psychiatric admissions. The relationship with other neuropsychiatric outcomes and complications remains unclear. Further research is required before any public health recommendations can be made. Trial registration number: The study was registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42018090145.

The impact of time to adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) on survival in colorectal cancer (CRC): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 364-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. Biagi ◽  
M. Raphael ◽  
W. D. King ◽  
W. Kong ◽  
W. J. Mackillop ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Publication Bias ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

364 Background: The optimal timing from CRC surgery to initiation of AC is unknown. We report a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the relationship between time to adjuvant chemotherapy (TTAC) and survival. Methods: A systematic review of literature was done to identify studies that described the relationship between TTAC and survival. Studies were only included if the distribution of relevant prognostic factors was adequately described, and either comparative groups were balanced or results adjusted for the prognostic factors. Hazard ratio (HR) and TTAC for overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) from each study were converted to a regression coefficient (β) and standard error (SE) corresponding to a continuous representation per 4 weeks of TTAC. The adjusted β from individual studies were combined using a fixed-effect model. Inverse-variance (1/SE2) was used to weight individual studies. The possible effect of publication bias was investigated using the trim and fill approach. Results: We identified 9 eligible studies involving 14,357 patients (4 published articles, 5 abstracts). Two studies were randomized trials and 7 were cohort studies. Six studies reported TTAC as a binary variable and 3 reported TTAC as ≥3 categories. An estimate of HR for OS was derived from all 9 studies and estimate for DFS was derived from 5 studies. Meta-analysis demonstrated that a 4-week increase in TTAC was associated with a significant decrease in both OS (HR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.09-1.15), and DFS (HR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.11-1.20). The analysis showed no significant heterogeneity among studies. These TTAC associations remained significant after analysis for potential publication bias, and when the analysis was repeated excluding the two studies of largest weight. Conclusions: This study demonstrates a 12% increase in the risk of death for each 4 week of delay in the start of AC for CRC. These findings indicate the need for clinicians and health systems managers to take the steps necessary to keep TTAC as short as reasonably achievable. In addition, our results suggest there may be some benefit to AC after a 3-month TTAC delay. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Predictive value of primary tumor location (TL) in patients (pts) with pan-RAS wild-type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving chemotherapy (CTX) ± cetuximab or panitumumab (C/P): An updated meta-analysis.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 830-830 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zi-Xian Wang ◽  
Ming-ming He ◽  
Ying-Nan Wang ◽  
Feng Wang ◽  
Rui-hua Xu
Keyword(s):  
Random Effects ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Analytic Models

830 Background: Previous evidence suggests that TL may be predictive of the efficacy of C/P versus bevacizumab. This meta-analysis was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of CTX plus C/P versus CTX only as a first-line (1L) or second-line (2L) treatment for RAS wt right- and left-sided mCRC (R- and L-mCRC) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: A systematic literature review was performed of PubMed and oncology congress websites (2000–present). RCTs studying the additional efficacy of C/P to CTX in RAS wt R- and L-mCRC were included. Assessed outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR). Random-effects meta-analytic models were used in the presence of significant heterogeneity ( I2> 50%). Otherwise, fixed-effects models were performed. Random-effects meta-regression models were used to evaluate the interaction between TL and the efficacy of C/P. Results: A total of three 1L RCTs (CRYSTAL, PRIME, and TAILOR) and one 2L RCT (20050181) were included (325 pts with R-mCRC and 1214 with L-mCRC). Pooled estimates of the efficacy of C/P are summarized in the table. In both R- and L-mCRC pts, the addition of C/P to CTX significantly improved PFS and ORR. A significant OS benefit from C/P was observed in L-mCRC but not R-mCRC pts. No significant interaction was detected between TL and the efficacy of C/P on PFS, OS, and ORR ( P= 0.69, 0.09, and 0.22, respectively). Conclusions: Adding C/P to CTX clearly benefits RAS wt L-mCRC pts in terms of PFS, OS, and ORR. Considering the improvements in PFS and ORR versus CTX only, anti-EGFR agents remain an option for pts with RAS wt R-mCRC. [Table: see text]

BDNF Val66Met and clinical response to antipsychotic drugs: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Cargnin ◽  
A. Massarotti ◽  
S. Terrazzino
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Response ◽  
Publication Bias ◽  
Antipsychotic Drugs ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Individual Variability ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Relevant Effect ◽  
Quantitative Synthesis ◽  
The Impact

AbstractBackgroundThe polymorphic brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene has been postulated to be involved in inter-individual variability response to antipsychotic drugs.PurposeTo perform a qualitative and quantitative synthesis of studies evaluating the influence of BDNF genetic variation on clinical response to antipsychotics.MethodsThe review protocol was published in the PROSPERO database (Reg. no CRD42015024614). A comprehensive search was performed through PubMed, Web of Knowledge and Cochrane databases up to July 2015. The methodological quality of identified studies was assessed using the MINORS criteria. Publication bias was estimated and potential sources of heterogeneity were investigated via meta-regression, subgroup and sensitivity analyses.ResultsNine studies including a total of 2461 antipsychotic-treated patients fulfilled inclusion criteria for meta-analysis of BDNF Val66Met. Using the random-effects model, the pooled results showed no significant association with antipsychotic response for the dominant (Met carriers vs Val/Val, OR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.72–1.19, P = 0.55), codominant (Met/Met vs Val/Val, OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.59–1.15, P = 0.25), recessive (Met/Met vs Val carriers, OR: 0.81, 95% CI 0.60–1.10, P = 0.18) or the allelic contrast (Met vs Val, OR: 0.92, 95% CI 0.76–1.10, P = 0.34). Visual inspection of funnel plots and further evaluation with Egger's test did not suggest evidence of publication bias. Despite lack of significant heterogeneity in most comparisons, no evidence of association also emerged in the subgroup and sensitivity analyses conducted.ConclusionThe present meta-analysis excludes a clinically relevant effect of BDNF Val66Met on antipsychotic drug response per se. Nevertheless, further investigation is still needed to clarify in well-designed, large sample-based studies, the impact of BDNF haplotypes containing the Val66Met polymorphism.

scholarly journals Risk of Parkinson’s Disease in the Users of Antihypertensive Agents: An Evidence from the Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amarnath Mullapudi ◽  
Kapil Gudala ◽  
Chandra Sekhar Boya ◽  
Dipika Bansal
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Publication Bias ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Antihypertensive Agents ◽  
Protective Role ◽  
Large Sample Size ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Channel Blockers

Background. Antihypertensive agents have been shown to inhibit oxidative stress and inflammatory response and thus neuroprotection in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Epidemiological evidence suggests inconsistency between use of antihypertensives and risk of PD. This study is aimed to examine the association between antihypertensive use and risk of PD. Methods. Literature search in PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO database was undertaken through February 2012 looking for observational studies evaluating the association between antihypertensive drug use and risk of PD. Before meta-analysis, the studies were evaluated for publication bias and heterogeneity. Pooled relative risk (RR) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects model (DerSimonian and Laird method). Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analysis were also performed. Results. Seven relevant studies including a total of 28,32,991 subjects were included. Pooled RR of overall use of antihypertensive agents was found to be 0.95 (95% CI 0.84–1.05). A significant reduction in the risk of PD was observed among users of calcium channel blockers (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71–0.93). Significant heterogeneity (I2 = 76.2%) but no publication bias was observed. Conclusions. Overall use of antihypertensive agents showed no significant association with the risk of PD. CCBs provided significant protective role. However, studies with large sample size and dose relationships are required to strengthen our hypothesis.

scholarly journals Genetic Variants Modifying the Risk of Lung Cancer and Its Subtypes: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis and a Case-control Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debmalya Sengupta ◽  
Souradeep Banerjee ◽  
Ritabrata Mitra ◽  
Tamohan Chaudhuri ◽  
Abhijit Sarkar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Random Effects ◽  
Case Control Study ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Effect Modification ◽  
Fixed Effect ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Control Study

Abstract Association studies on lung cancer have often yielded conflicting and inconclusive results. We performed a comprehensive meta-analysis to dissect the precise effects of the candidate variants. We searched for association studies on lung cancer from the Indian subcontinent. Cochran’s Q-test assessed heterogeneity. Both overall and histotype-stratified meta-analysis was done using fixed-effect and random-effects models. Smoking status stratified subgroup analysis and effect modification tests were done. An associated variant with significant heterogeneity was genotyped in an eastern Indian population to investigate the contribution of potential confounders followed by a comprehensive meta-analysis across world populations. Significant heterogeneity was observed for the 8 variants. Both fixed-effect and random-effects meta-analysis of 24 variants showed FDR-corrected associations of rs3547/XRCC1 and rs1048943/CYP1A1 with lung cancer along with 5 nominal associations. del1/GSTT1, rs4646903/CYP1A1, and rs10488943/CYP1A1 were associated with adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and both, respectively. rs4646903/CYP1A1 was associated with lung cancer among smokers with significant effect modification by smoking. rs10488943/CYP1A1 was associated with lung adenocarcinoma in the East Indian case-control study. rs1048943/CYP1A1 was associated with lung cancer across world populations. Our work confirms the risk loci for lung cancer and its subtypes in the context of smoking and other aetiological factors, which could aid in personalised treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document