scholarly journals Cutaneous Diphtheria by Nontoxigenic Corynebacterium Diphtheriae in Diabetic Patient: A Case Report

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pooja Singla ◽  
Pratibha Mane ◽  
Prashant Singh
Keyword(s):  
Wound Infection ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Significant Risk Factor ◽  
Rpob Gene ◽  
Corynebacterium Diphtheriae ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Conventional Pcr ◽  
Lower Back ◽  
Test Patient ◽  
Precipitation Test

Chronic diabetes mellitus is a significant risk factor for skin and soft tissue infections. Corynebacterium diphtheriae is a rare cause of wound infection in chronic diabetic patients. Here, a rare case of wound infection by non-toxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriaein a chronic diabetic 45-year-old female patient has been reported. She presented with multiple discharging punched out ulcers on lower back. Diagnosis was confirmed by conventional PCR detecting rpoB gene and toxigenicity testing by Elek’s gel precipitation test. Patient was treated with IV benzylpenicillin and regular dressing. Isolation of single opportunistic microorganism creates a characteristic feature in the present case.

scholarly journals Type-2 Diabetes as a Risk Factor for Severe COVID-19 Infection

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1211
Author(s):  
Mahnaz Norouzi ◽  
Shaghayegh Norouzi ◽  
Alistaire Ruggiero ◽  
Mohammad S. Khan ◽  
Stephen Myers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Inflammatory Responses ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Significant Risk Factor ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 ◽  
Immune System Dysfunction ◽  
Current Outbreak

The current outbreak caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), termed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has generated a notable challenge for diabetic patients. Overall, people with diabetes have a higher risk of developing different infectious diseases and demonstrate increased mortality. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a significant risk factor for COVID-19 progression and its severity, poor prognosis, and increased mortality. How diabetes contributes to COVID-19 severity is unclear; however, it may be correlated with the effects of hyperglycemia on systemic inflammatory responses and immune system dysfunction. Using the envelope spike glycoprotein SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 binds to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors, a key protein expressed in metabolic organs and tissues such as pancreatic islets. Therefore, it has been suggested that diabetic patients are more susceptible to severe SARS-CoV-2 infections, as glucose metabolism impairments complicate the pathophysiology of COVID-19 disease in these patients. In this review, we provide insight into the COVID-19 disease complications relevant to diabetes and try to focus on the present data and growing concepts surrounding SARS-CoV-2 infections in T2DM patients.

Abstract 2605: Hypoglycemia Does Not Increase Long-term Mortality Or Morbidity In Diabetic Patients With Myocardial Infarction. A Report From The Digami 2 Trial.

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda G Mellbin ◽  
Klas Malmberg ◽  
Anders Waldenstrom ◽  
Hans Wedel ◽  
Lars Ryden
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Blood Glucose ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Significant Risk Factor ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Type 2 Dm ◽  
Hazard Ratios

Aims Tight, insulin-based glucose control is recommended to diabetic patients (DM pat) with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). A potential draw-back would be if insulin induced hypoglycaemia (HG) had a negative impact of future prognosis. Methods 1253 pat (mean age 68 years; 67% males) with type 2 DM and suspect AMI were followed for a median of 2.1 years. 947 were randomised to insulin infusion during at least 24 hours while 306 were treated routinely. HG (blood glucose<3.0 mmol/L with or without symptoms) was recorded during hospitalisation. Unadjusted and adjusted (age, sex, smoking, previous MI and heart failure, renal function, duration of DM, coronary interventions, blood glucose at randomisation) Hazard Ratios (HR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) for cardiovascular events (CVE = death, MI or stroke) during follow up were calculated. Results 153 pat (12.2%) experienced HG. During the first 24 hours 111 (11.7%) insulin-treated pat experienced HG (symptomatic 23.4%) compared with 3 (1.0%) pat on routine treatment (symptomatic 33.3%). As outlined in the figure HG was not an independent predictor of subsequent CVE. Conclusion Insulin induced HG was not a significant risk factor for subsequent CVE in AMI-pat with type 2 DM. Hypoglycaemic seem to identify patients at high risk for other reasons.

scholarly journals Obesity Does Not Increase Mortality after Emergency Surgery

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Ferrada ◽  
Rahul J. Anand ◽  
Ajai Malhotra ◽  
Michel Aboutanos
Keyword(s):  
Wound Infection ◽  
Emergency Surgery ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Significant Risk Factor ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
Nonobese Patients ◽  
The Impact

Objective.The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of obesity on patient outcomes after emergency surgery.Methods.A list of all patients undergoing emergent general surgical procedures during the 12 months ending in July 2012 was obtained from the operating room log. A chart review was performed to obtain the following data: patient characteristics (age, gender, BMI, and preexisting comorbidities), indication for surgery, and outcomes (pulmonary embolus (PE), deep venous thrombosis (DVT), respiratory failure, ICU admission, wound infection, pneumonia, and mortality). Obesity was defined as a BMI over 25. Comparisons of outcomes between obese and nonobese patients were evaluated using Fischer’s exact test. Predictors of mortality were evaluated using logistic regression.Results.341 patients were identified during the study period. 202 (59%) were obese. Both groups were similar in age (48 for obese versus 47 for nonobese,P=0.42). Obese patients had an increased incidence of diabetes, (27% versus 7%,P<0.05), hypertension (52% versus 34%,P<0.05), and sleep apnea (0% versus 5%,P<0.05). There was a statistically significant increased incidence of postoperative wound infection (obese 9.9% versus nonobese 4.3%,P<0.05) and ICU admission (obese 58% versus nonobese 42%,P=0.01) among the obese patients. Obesity alone was not shown to be a significant risk factor for mortality.Conclusions.A higher BMI is not an independent predictor of mortality after emergency surgery. Obese patients are at a higher risk of developing wound infections and requiring ICU admission after emergent general surgical procedure.

scholarly journals Comparison of Early Mechanical and Infective Complications in First Time Blind, Bedside, Midline Percutaneous Tenckhoff Catheter Insertion with Ultra-Short Break-in Period in Diabetics and Non-Diabetics: Setting New Standards

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 655-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ninoo George ◽  
Suceena Alexander ◽  
Vinoi George David ◽  
Gopal Basu ◽  
Anjali Mohapatra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Significant Risk ◽  
Significant Risk Factor ◽  
Catheter Insertion ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Catheter Survival ◽  
Technique Survival ◽  
Catheter Migration ◽  
Tenckhoff Catheter ◽  
Percutaneous Catheter ◽  
Infective Complications

Background There are no large studies that have examined ultra-short break-in period with a blind, bedside, midline approach to Tenckhoff catheter insertion. Methods Observational cohort study of 245 consecutive adult patients who underwent percutaneous catheter insertion for chronic peritoneal dialysis (PD) at our center from January 2009 to December 2013. There were 132 (53.9%) diabetics and 113 (46.1%) non-diabetics in the cohort. Results The mean break-in period for the percutaneous group was 2.68 ± 2.6 days. There were significantly more males among the diabetics (103 [78%] vs 66 [58.4%], p = 0.001). Diabetics had a significantly higher body mass index (BMI) (23.9 ± 3.7 kg/m2 vs 22.2 ± 4 kg/m2, p < 0.001) and lower serum albumin (33.1 ± 6.3 g/L vs 37 ± 6 g/L, p < 0.001) compared with non-diabetics. Poor catheter outflow was present in 6 (4.5%) diabetics and 16 (14.2%) non-diabetics ( p = 0.009). Catheter migration was also significantly more common in the non-diabetic group (11 [9.7%] vs 2 [1.5%], p = 0.004). Primary catheter non-function was present in 17(15%) of the non-diabetics and in 7(5.3%) of the diabetics ( p = 0.01). There were no mortality or major non-procedural complications during the catheter insertions. Among patients with 1 year of follow-up data, catheter survival (93/102 [91.2%] vs 71/82 [86.6%], p = 0.32) and technique survival (93/102 [91.2%] vs 70/82 [85.4%], p = 0.22) at 1 year was comparable between diabetics and non-diabetics, respectively. Conclusions Percutaneous catheter insertion by practicing nephrologists provides a short break-in period with very low mechanical and infective complications. Non-diabetic status emerged as a significant risk factor for primary catheter non-function presumed to be due to more patients with lower BMI and thus smaller abdominal cavities. This is the first report that systematically compares diabetic and non-diabetic patients.

scholarly journals Prevalence and Factors Associated with Musculoskeletal Disorders among Secondary Schoolteachers in Hail, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Survey

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 6632
Author(s):  
Omar W. Althomali ◽  
Junaid Amin ◽  
Wael Alghamdi ◽  
Daria Hussain Shaik
Keyword(s):  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Musculoskeletal Disorders ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Significant Risk Factor ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Lower Back

Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are one of the most common occupational health hazards and serious health concerns among teachers. About 39% to 95% of teachers suffer from musculoskeletal pain that can lead to a decline in their performance, frequent sick leaves and early retirement, and can have a negative impact on their quality of life. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of and risk factors for MSDs among secondary schoolteachers in Hail, Saudi Arabia. A cross-sectional study was conducted through an electronic survey. A self-reported and validated Arabic version of the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ) was used. Participants were recruited randomly through a two-stage sampling technique. A total of 251 respondents (57.8% males and 42.2% females) returned the questionnaire. The overall prevalence of MSDs was 87.3%. Female teachers (95.3%) suffered more than their male counterparts (81.4%). The most common site was the lower back (62.55%), followed by the shoulders (53.39%) and knees (41.04%). Most of the participants (72.7%) reported MSDs in multiple sites. Binomial logistic regression predicted that smoking is a significant risk factor for lower back disorders (p < 0.05). A high prevalence of MSDs can be due to a substantial lack of awareness and practice of ergonomics, which warrant the development of preventive strategies and educational programs.

Catheter Infections in Insulin-Dependent Diabetics on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 347-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Holley ◽  
Judith Bernardini ◽  
Beth Piraino
Keyword(s):  
Significant Risk ◽  
Significant Risk Factor ◽  
Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Dependent Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Catheter Infection ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Insulin Dependent ◽  
Catheter Infections

We compared a group of 60 insulin-dependent diabetics maintained on CAPO with 60 nondiabetic matched controls to determine if the diabetic patients were at increased risk for catheter-related infections. Although catheter infection rates were 17% higher in the diabetics (1.4/year versus 1.2/year in nondiabetics), time to first catheter infection was not different between the groups (p=0.6). Rates of peritonitis, peritonitis associated with catheter infection, multiple catheter infection, and catheter removal were also similar among the diabetics and controls. S. aureus caused 52% (42/81) of the catheter infections in the diabetics and 60% (35/58) in the controls. More catheter infections in the nondiabetics versus the diabetics lacked drainage or resulted in sterile cultures (17/75 versus 7/88 respectively, p≤0.01), but the significance of this finding is uncertain. In conclusion, we did not find insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus to be a statistically significant risk factor for catheter-related infections.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document