It is known that the physiology of Methanosarcina species can differ significantly, but the ecological impact of these differences is unclear. We recovered two strains of Methanosarcina from two different ecosystems with a similar enrichment and isolation method. Both strains had the same ability to metabolize organic substrates and participate in direct interspecies electron transfer, but also had major physiological differences. Strain DH-1, which was isolated from an anaerobic digester, could use H2 as an electron donor. Genome analysis indicated that it lacks an Rnf complex and conserves energy from acetate metabolism via intracellular H2 cycling. In contrast, strain DH-2, a subsurface isolate, lacks hydrogenases required for H2 uptake and cycling, and has an Rnf complex for energy conservation when growing on acetate. Further analysis of the genomes of previously described isolates, as well as phylogenetic and metagenomic data on uncultured Methanosarcina in anaerobic digesters and diverse soils and sediments, further revealed a physiological dichotomy that corresponded with environment of origin. The physiology of Type I Methanosarcina revolves around H2 production and consumption. In contrast, Type II Methanosarcina eschew H2, and have genes for an Rnf complex and the multi-heme, membrane-bound c-type cytochrome MmcA, shown to be essential for extracellular electron transfer. The distribution of Methanosarcina species in diverse environments suggests that the Type I H2-based physiology is well suited for high energy environments, like anaerobic digesters, whereas Type II Rnf/cytochrome-based physiology is an adaption to the slower, steady-state carbon and electron fluxes common in organic-poor anaerobic soils and sediments.
Importance
Biogenic methane is a significant greenhouse gas and the conversion of organic wastes to methane is an important bioenergy process. Methanosarcina species play an important role in methane production in many methanogenic soils and sediments as well as anaerobic waste digesters. The studies reported here emphasize that the genus Methanosarcina is composed of two physiologically distinct groups. This is important to recognize when interpreting the role of Methanosarcina in methanogenic environments, especially regarding H2 metabolism. Furthermore, the finding that Type I Methanosarcina predominate in environments with high rates of carbon and electron flux and that Type II Methanosarcina predominate in lower energy environments suggests that evaluating the relative abundance of Type I and Type II Methanosarcina may provide further insights into rates of carbon and electron flux in methanogenic environments.