RELATIONSHIP BEHAVIOR PATTERNS IN IMPROVING EDUCATIONAL SERVICES- ROBBINS ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR PERSPECTIVE

<div><pre>research data is qualitative data about bureaucratic behavior in the implementation of education policies. Sources of data obtained from interviews and FGD about the focus of the research. The research data is compiled and verified before the analysis is carried out by triangulation of data on behavior which includes knowledge, abilities, discipline, motivation and employee responsibilities at the individual, group and organizational levels </pre></div><div><br></div>

RELATIONSHIP BEHAVIOR PATTERNS IN IMPROVING EDUCATIONAL SERVICES- ROBBINS ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR PERSPECTIVE

<div><pre>research data is qualitative data about bureaucratic behavior in the implementation of education policies. Sources of data obtained from interviews and FGD about the focus of the research. The research data is compiled and verified before the analysis is carried out by triangulation of data on behavior which includes knowledge, abilities, discipline, motivation and employee responsibilities at the individual, group and organizational levels </pre></div><div><br></div>

Peran Komunikasi dalam Implementasi Kebijakan Perluasan Akses Pendidikan secara Merata (Pada Dinas Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Kabupaten Gorontalo)

Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mendeskripsikan peran komunikasi dalam implementasi kebijakan peningkatan perluasan askses pendidikan secara merata terutama dalam pencapaian sasaran-sasaran kebijakan secara efektif. Implementasi kebijakan memerlukan metode-metode yang dijalankan dalam komunikasi yang efektif dalam perilaku birokrasi. Lokus penelitian dilaksanakan pada Dinas Pendidikan Kabupaten Gorontalo Provinsi Gorontalo. Pendekatan penelitian dilakukan melalui metode kualitatif deskriptif dengan informan penelitian adalah seluruh pegawai yang terlibat dalam implementasi kebijakan pada lokus penelitian. Jenis dan sumber data yang digunakan adalah data primer berupa dokumen, foto, gambar, dan data primer berupa hasil wawancara serta hasil-hasil temuan penelitian dan lain sebagainya. Dari hasil penelitian disimpulkan bahwa implementasi kebijakan memerlukan mekanisme dan pendekatan-pendekatan sebagai metode dalam pencapaian keberhasilan atau efektifitas kebijakan. Metode-metode atau pendekatan-pendekatan tersebut hanya dapat dijalankan secara efektif melalui komunikasi yang baik antara bidang kerja, antara atasan dan bawahan, antara birokrasi dan masyarakat penerima layanan pendidikan, dan komunikasi antara birokrasi dan kemitraan masyarakat. This study was conducted to describe the role of communication in the implementation of policies to increase the expansion of access to education evenly, especially in achieving policy goals effectively. Policy implementation requires methods that are carried out in effective communication in bureaucratic behavior. The research locus was carried out at the Gorontalo District Education Office, Gorontalo Province. The research approach was carried out through descriptive qualitative methods with research informants being all employees involved in implementing policies at the research locus. The types and sources of data used are primary data in the form of documents, photos, pictures, and primary data in the form of interviews and research findings and so on. From the results of the study, it is concluded that policy implementation requires mechanisms and approaches as methods in achieving policy success or effectiveness. These methods or approaches can only be carried out effectively through good communication between the fields of work, between superiors and subordinates, between the bureaucracy and the community receiving education services, and communication between the bureaucracy and community partnerships.

The Limits of Meritocracy in Stabilizing Democracy and the Twin Importance of Bureaucratic Impartiality and Effectiveness

Theories connecting meritocracy and democratic stability are heavily understudied, and there are few attempts to empirically disentangle the potential mechanisms. This article proposes a novel explanation, emphasizing that bureaucratic impartiality and effectiveness provide separate shields that stabilize democracies. Impartiality protects the opposition from unlawful discrimination, which raises support for democracy among the (potential) losers of elections and reduces the incentives to rebel or stage coups d’état, whereas effectiveness serves incumbent policies, which raises support among the (potential) winners and reduces the likelihood of incumbent takeovers. I find support for these propositions in comparative-historical analyses of a few paradigmatic cases—interwar Finland, Czechoslovakia, and Germany—with similar levels of economic development, imperial-autocratic legacies, and meritocratic types of administration but different regime outcomes. The results show that both impartial and effective bureaucratic behavior rather than meritocratic recruitment norms as such are important stabilizers of democracy. Yet they emphasize the importance of bureaucratic effectiveness in raising the perception that votes count to change outcomes on the ground and thus that democracy makes a difference. I argue that this should have a wider significance for the study of contemporary processes of democratic recession.

Reformasi Birokrasi Lokal Berbasis Kepulauan di Kecamatan Tanimbar Selatan Ditinjau dari Dimensi Manajemen Tata Kelola Pemerintahan

Bureaucratic reform is a major and fundamental change in the paradigm and governance of Indonesia. Various bureaucratic reform movements experienced by developed countries have been inspired by public pressure on the need to improve the quality of public services provided by the government. The issue of bureaucracy is interesting to debate in the context of public administration in South Tanimbar District because the bureaucracy is ineffective. The research method used is descriptive qualitative research. The results show that the accountability aspect of the apparatus in public services has been implemented, but it needs guidance, capacity and mental improvement. Monitoring and evaluation are not optimal because of the mentality, culture and elitist nature of the bureaucracy. Law enforcement has been implemented, but not optimally. The transparency aspect of public services has been implemented but has not been maximized. The conclusion is that the dimensions of management and good governance are not optimal, especially the bureaucratic behavior tends to be pathological in the mentality of the bureaucratic apparatus. Procedures and systems are still considered a formality only exists on paper. The meaning of bureaucracy in the clarity of procedures, the whole context of governance. Supervision and control are carried out if there are evaluation indicators, unclear SOPs and workload make it very difficult to measure the evaluation process. The mentality, culture and elitist nature of the bureaucracy have an impact on law enforcement both in terms of policy substance and procedure.

The Influence of Bureaucracy Apparatus' Behaviour to Service Quality of Land Certificate (Study at the Land Office of Majalengka, West Java)

This study aims to show the bureaucratic apparatus's behavior towards the quality of land certificate services and find new concepts about the bureaucratic apparatus's behavior. The methodology used in this research is the explanatory survey method, following the study's objectives, which will explain the relationship between variables, namely the behavior of bureaucratic officials to the quality of land certificate services. Based on the results of research and discussion of the influence of the behavior of bureaucratic officials on the quality of service certificates at the Land Office of Majalengka Regency, the following can be disclosed: 1) The behavior of bureaucratic officials is oriented towards the dimensions of justice, empathy, discipline, sensitivity, and responsibility. Significantly affects the quality of land certificate services; 2) The height bureaucratic behavior towards the quality of land certificate services is determined by the dimensions of Fairness, empathy, discipline, sensitivity, and responsibility. and 3) Furthermore, from the results of this research, it can be found and developed a new model that "Kharimah behavior" are words for the dimension of caring in providing public services.

Media Attention and Bureaucratic Responsiveness

How does media attention shape bureaucratic behavior? We answer this question using novel data from the Mexican federal government. We first develop a new indicator for periods of anomalously heightened media attention, based on 150,000 news articles pertaining to 22 Mexican government ministries and agencies, and qualitatively categorize their themes. We then evaluate government responsiveness using administrative data on roughly 500,000 requests for government information over a 10-year period, with their associated responses. A panel fixed-effects approach demonstrates effects of media attention on the volume of outgoing weekly responses, while a second approach finds effects on the “queue” of information requests already filed when anomalous media attention begins. Consistent across these empirical approaches, we find that media attention shapes bureaucratic behavior. Positive or neutral attention is associated with reduced responsiveness, while the effects of negative attention vary, with attention to government failures leading to increased responsiveness but attention to corruption leading to reduced responsiveness. These patterns are consistent with mechanisms of reputation management, disclosure threat, and workload burden, but inconsistent with mechanisms of credit claiming or blame avoidance.

The Political Economy of Bureaucratic Overload: Evidence from Rural Development Officials in India

Government programs often fail on the ground because of poor implementation by local bureaucrats. Prominent explanations for poor implementation emphasize bureaucratic rent-seeking and capture. This article documents a different pathology that we term bureaucratic overload: local bureaucrats are often heavily under-resourced relative to their responsibilities. We advance a two-step theory explaining why bureaucratic overload is detrimental to implementation as well as why politicians under-invest in local bureaucracy, emphasizing a lack of electoral incentives. Drawing on a nationwide survey of local rural development officials across India, including time-usage diaries that measure their daily behavior, we provide quantitative evidence that (i) officials with fewer resources are worse at implementing rural development programs, plausibly because they are unable to allocate enough time to managerial tasks and (ii) fewer resources are provided in administrative units where political responsibility for implementation is less clear. The findings shed light on the political economy and bureaucratic behavior underpinning weak local state capacity.

What International Bureaucrats (Really) Want

The secretariats of international organizations (international public administrations [IPA s]) constitute the institutional grid of global governance. While recent research has provided valuable insights into the independent capacities of international organizations (IO s) and the influence of IPA s, we lack systematic knowledge of how scholars conceptualize the preferences of IO staff. This is lamentable because understanding the (unifying) motivations of “international civil servants” helps us to make sense of their behavior and influence during the adoption and application of IO policies. To review how IPA studies conceptualize the preferences of international bureaucrats, this article suggests a fourfold typology of ideal-typical bureaucratic behavior. It distinguishes between the underlying behavioral logic and dominant bureaucratic goal orientation. Applying the typology to thirty-nine journal articles allows us to map IPA preferences and behavior, and shows that the literature predominantly views IPA s as behaving responsibly and less self-centeredly than could be expected from economic accounts of bureaucracy.

Analysis of the Behavior of Bureaucrats on Service Quality

Until now, bureaucratic behavior cannot be separated from the unpleasant terms addressed to bureaucrats who work in government. This is due to the low understanding of these bureaucrats in carrying out their duties. The purpose of the research carried out at the One Stop Investment Service and One Stop Services in Bone Regency is to find out what kind of behavior the bureaucrats are in providing services, how the quality of services provided and the extent to which bureaucrats' behavior affects the quality of Licensing Services at the Investment Service and Integrated Services One. Pintu District Bone. To answer these questions, the stages of the research method are used, starting from theoretical and empirical studies, preparation of proposals, testing the validity and reliability of the instrument, data collection, analysis and discussion. The data analysis used was qualitative. The mandatory output is in the form of a scientific publication in a national journal. The results showed that bureaucratic behavior seen from the level of politeness in serving the community was considered high, the behavior of bureaucrats with disciplinary and caring aspects was also in the very high category so that it significantly affected the quality of service at the One Stop Investment and One Stop Services, Bone Regency