Impairment of T cells' antiviral and anti-inflammation immunities may be critical to death from COVID-19

Clarifying dominant factors determining the immune heterogeneity from non-survivors to survivors is crucial for developing therapeutics and vaccines against COVID-19. The main difficulty is quantitatively analysing the multi-level clinical data, including viral dynamics, immune response and tissue damages. Here, we adopt a top-down modelling approach to quantify key functional aspects and their dynamical interplay in the battle between the virus and the immune system, yielding an accurate description of real-time clinical data involving hundreds of patients for the first time. The quantification of antiviral responses gives that, compared to antibodies, T cells play a more dominant role in virus clearance, especially for mild patients (96.5%). Moreover, the anti-inflammatory responses, namely the cytokine inhibition and tissue repair rates, also positively correlate with T cell number and are significantly suppressed in non-survivors. Simulations show that the lack of T cells can lead to more significant inflammation, proposing an explanation for the monotonic increase of COVID-19 mortality with age and higher mortality for males. We propose that T cells play a crucial role in the immunity against COVID-19, which provides a new direction–improvement of T cell number for advancing current prevention and treatment.

Colchicine – an effective treatment for children with a clinical diagnosis of autoinflammatory diseases without pathogenic gene variants

Background Autoinflammatory diseases (AID) are rare chronic conditions with high disease burden, affecting children and adults. Clinically and genetically confirmed, AID can be effectively treated with targeted cytokine inhibition. In contrast, for patients with clinical AID symptoms without pathogenic gene variants, no treatment recommendations are available. Colchicine is approved and established as effective, safe and low-cost first-line therapy in Familial Mediterranean Fever. Up to now, efficacy data for colchicine in children with a clinical AID diagnosis without pathogenic gene variants are rare. This pilot study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of colchicine in children with a clinical diagnosis of AID without pathogenic gene variants. Methods A pilot cohort study of consecutive children with active clinical AID without pathogenic gene variants treated with colchicine monotherapy was performed between 01/2009 and 12/2018. Demographics, clinical and laboratory characteristics were determined serially. Colchicine dosing and safety were documented. Physician estimate of disease activity was captured on visual analogue scales (VAS). Primary outcome: Complete response (PGA ≤2 plus CRP ≤0.5 mg/dL and/or SAA ≤10 mg/L) at last follow-up. Secondary outcomes: partial/no response, flare characteristics and requirement for rescue therapies. Analysis: Nonparametric comparison of disease activity measures. Results A total of 33 children were included; 39% were female. Median age at colchicine start was 3.8 years, median follow-up was 14.1 months. Clinical AID diagnoses included CAPS (24%), FMF (27%), PFAPA (43%) and unclassified AID (6%). At baseline, overall disease activity was moderate (PGA 4), inflammatory markers were elevated (CRP 12.1 mg/dL; SAA 289.2 mg/L), and 97% reported febrile flares. Outcome: 55% achieved complete response, 35% showed partial response and 58% had no febrile flares at last follow-up. Inflammatory markers (SAA: p < 0.0001, CRP: p < 0.005) and disease activity (p < 0.0001) decreased significantly. Overall, 93% of children experienced improvement of flare characteristics. Conclusion Colchicine was found to be effective and safe in children with a clinical AID diagnosis in the absence of pathogenic gene variants. Colchicine is a low-cost treatment option for non-organ threatening AID.

Drugs Shown to Inhibit SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 Disease: Comparative Basic and Clinical Pharmacology of Molnupiravir and Ivermectin

The pharmacology of anti-SARS-CoV-2 drugs, Molnupiravir (M) and repurposed Ivermectin (IV) were compared. The IC50 for the inhibition of viral replication were 0.3μM for M and 2.8μM for IV. Both drugs have good oral absorption, with M achieving peak plasma concentrations by 2 hours and IV by 5 hours. The plasma half life were 7 hours for M and 81-91 hours for IV. M inhibits viral replication inducing viral mutagenesis in RdRp, causing viral error catastrophe and viral extinction. IV affects viral cell entry, nuclear transport and inhibits replication via RdRp. IV has additional effect to suppress cytokine production through STAT-3 inhibition. M is a more potent antiviral drug and IV has a longer residence in the body. Their effects on RdRp and cytokine inhibition are potentially complimentary for anti-COVID-19 activity. Both IV and M should be compared in randomized controlled clinical trials, and the possibility of their combination for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antiviral actions, explored further.

Cytokines-Biogenesis and Their Role in Human Breast Milk and Determination

Cytokines play a huge role in many biological processes. Their production, release and interactions are subject to a very complex mechanism. Cytokines are produced by all types of cells, they function very differently and they are characterized by synergism in action, antagonism, and aggregation activity, opposing action of one cytokine, overlapping activity, induction of another cytokine, inhibition of cytokine synthesis at the mRNA level as well as autoregulation-stimulation or inhibition of own production. The predominance of pro-inflammatory cytokines leads to a systemic inflammatory response, and anti-inflammatory-to an anti-inflammatory response. They regulate the organism’s immune response and protect it against sudden disturbances in homeostasis. The synthesis and activity of cytokines are influenced by the central nervous system through the endocrine system (pituitary gland, adrenal glands).

P275 Course of COVID-19 in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases treated with biologics: the Israeli experience

Background Biologic treatments are inherently associated with an increased risk of infections, and recipients are intuitively considered at-risk for a more severe course of COVID-19. However, the actual risks are not fully described, neither are the appropriate adjustments needed to mitigate such risks. Methods Nation-wide registry was set up by Israeli IBD Section, to characterize course of COVID-19 in IBD patients who contacted SARS-CoV-2 infection while on biologics. We prospectively collected demographic and clinical data, and analyzed COVID-19 outcomes with regard to the specific treatments. Results Between Apr and Oct 2020, 144 patients with an established IBD diagnosis and confirmed COVID-19 were enrolled at 20 IBD referral centers. The majority of patients was under the age of 40 (113, 78%), 9 (6%) were younger than 18, only 4 patients (3%) over the age of 70. 94 patients received biologics, as monotherapy (76, 52.8%), combined with immunomodulators (9, 10%) or concomitant corticosteroids (9, 10%). 37 patients (26%) were reported with moderate and severe COVID-19 course, third of them (13) on biologics. 24 patents (17%) were admitted for hospitalization, the rest managed in home setting (114, 79%) and hotels converted into makeshift healthcare facilities (6, 4%). Fifteen patients (10%) required non-invasive ventilation and oxygen support, 3 patients (2%) went on mechanical ventilation. All patients recovered uneventfully, with no mortalities reported. Age was the most significant factor associated with moderate and severe disease. We found no correlation between bowel disease activity and the severity of COVID-19 course. The rate of serious COVID-19 for the 94 patients who had received biologics was significantly lower than that of 50 patients who were not treated with biologics (13/94 vs 24/50; RR 0.29 [95% CI, 0.161–0.515]; p &lt; 0.0001). On adjusting for age, gender, comorbidities, IBD phenotype and activity, the surprising ameliorating effect associated with biologics was profound and significant (OR, 0.082 [95% CI 0.009-0.621], p =0.013) in all age categories. Conclusion Our results are reassuring and encouraging, and do not suggest that therapeutic immune suppression renders IBD patients particularly vulnerable for more severe course of the COVID-19. Adjusted odds for severe COVID-19 course actually decreased significantly in patients treated with biologics. It could be speculated that cytokine inhibition may mitigate progression of the infection to a devastating hyperinflammatory state. Continuing necessary maintenance immune suppression seems to be appropriate and safe approach, despite the COVID-19 pandemic.

Impairment of T cells’ antiviral and anti-inflammation immunities dominates the death from COVID-19

Clarifying key factors dominating the immune heterogeneity from non-survivors to survivors is crucial for therapeutics and vaccine developments against COVID-19. The main difficulty is to quantitatively analyze the multi-level clinical data of viral dynamics, immune response, and tissue damages. Here, we adopt top-down modeling to quantify key functional aspects and their dynamical interplays in the virus-immune system battle, yielding an accurate description of real-time clinical data involving hundreds of patients for the first time. The quantification of antiviral responses demonstrates T cells’ dominant role in the virus clearance relative to antibodies, especially for mild patients (96.5%). Moreover, the anti-inflammatory responses, namely cytokine inhibition rate and tissue repair rate also have positive correlations with T cell number, and are significantly suppressed in non-survivors. Simulations show that impaired immune functions of T cells leads to greater inflammation (thus dominates the death), explaining the monotonous increase of COVID-19 mortality with age and higher mortality for males. We conclude that T cells play the role of crucial immunity that saves the death from COVID-19, which points out a new direction to advance current prevention and treatment by incorporating the vaccines, drugs and health care activities that aim to improve T cells’ number and functions.

Effect of Neuroprotective Magnesium Sulfate Treatment on Brain Transcription Response to Hypoxia Ischemia in Neonate Mice

MgSO4 is widely used in the prevention of preterm neurological disabilities but its modes of action remain poorly established. We used a co-hybridization approach using the transcriptome in 5-day old mice treated with a single dose of MgSO4 (600 mg/kg), and/or exposed to hypoxia-ischemia (HI). The transcription of hundreds of genes was altered in all the groups. MgSO4 mainly produced repressions culminating 6 h after injection. Bio-statistical analysis revealed the repression of synaptogenesis and axonal development. The putative targets of MgSO4 were Mnk1 and Frm1. A behavioral study of adults did not detect lasting effects of neonatal MgSO4 and precluded NMDA-receptor-mediated side effects. The effects of MgSO4 plus HI exceeded the sum of the effects of separate treatments. MgSO4 prior to HI reduced inflammation and the innate immune response probably as a result of cytokine inhibition (Ccl2, Ifng, interleukins). Conversely, MgSO4 had little effect on HI-induced transcription by RNA-polymerase II. De novo MgSO4-HI affected mitochondrial function through the repression of genes of oxidative phosphorylation and many NAD-dehydrogenases. It also likely reduced protein translation by the repression of many ribosomal proteins, essentially located in synapses. All these effects appeared under the putative regulatory MgSO4 induction of the mTORC2 Rictor coding gene. Lasting effects through Sirt1 and Frm1 could account for this epigenetic footprint.

Cytokines as therapeutic targets for cardio- and cerebrovascular diseases

Despite major advances in prevention and treatment, cardiac and cerebral atherothrombotic complications still account for substantial morbidity and mortality worldwide. In this context, inflammation is involved in the chronic process leading atherosclerotic plaque formation and its complications, as well as in the maladaptive response to acute ischemic events. For this reason, modulation of inflammation is nowadays seen as a promising therapeutic strategy to counteract the burden of cardio- and cerebrovascular disease. Being produced and recognized by both inflammatory and vascular cells, the complex network of cytokines holds key functions in the crosstalk of these two systems and orchestrates the progression of atherothrombosis. By binding to membrane receptors, these soluble mediators trigger specific intracellular signaling pathways eventually leading to the activation of transcription factors and a deep modulation of cell function. Both stimulatory and inhibitory cytokines have been described and progressively reported as markers of disease or interesting therapeutic targets in the cardiovascular field. Nevertheless, cytokine inhibition is burdened by harmful side effects that will most likely prevent its chronic use in favor of acute administrations in well-selected subjects at high risk. Here, we summarize the current state of knowledge regarding the modulatory role of cytokines on atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Then, we discuss evidence from clinical trials specifically targeting cytokines and the potential implication of these advances into daily clinical practice.