Background:Musculoskeletal ultrasonography (MSUS) is a valuable imaging modality for the practicing rheumatologist. In everyday practice, physical examination is limited by its sensitivity and subjectivity of assessment. MSUS is inexpensive, available, and allows repeat examination as soon as necessary. Thus, MSUS has become the “third eye” of the rheumatologist, in that it allows more detailed examination of muscles, bones, and joints, just as the stethoscope provides further details about the respiratory and cardiovascular systems. Most ultrasound examinations in Russia, including abdominal and vascular sonography, echocardiography, are conducted by trained physician - radiologist, called “ultrasonography specialists”. Nevertheless, it is very difficult to perform MSUS, mainly because standardized ultrasound protocols fore same region are different for various diseases and often do not provide physicians with the information they need, and also may been mistake. The conduct of MSUS by rheumatologists themselves is limited to the need for 4-month radiology (ultrasound) certification. However, the number of rheumatologists conducting MSUS themselves is increasing. Training week small group courses are provided by VA Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology for the practicing rheumatologist and other physicians.Objectives:We analyzed the training and awareness of the rheumatologists and radiologists in MSUS, as well as their commitment for participation in our courses.Methods:We studied a one and a half-year period, from June 2018 to December 2019. During this time, 57 applications were submitted to participate in the courses. All participants who arrived were tested before starting the course. Test included 40 general questions about MSUS. Test results as well as commitment to training were analyzed in two groups: rheumatologists and radiologists. Nonparametric statistics were used for data processing.Results:Among 57 applications submitted for the courses, 26 were from rheumatologists and 31 from radiologists, but the courses were attended by 13 rheumatologists and 26 radiologists (68%). Thus, commitment was reliably higher in radiologists (84%) than in rheumatologists (50%). Fisher’s methods show high statistically significance (Χ2= 7,51, p = 0,006). Although the test focused on ultrasound, it was surprise for us that the median percentage of correct answers was higher in rheumatologists - 64 (54; 80)%, than radiologists (“ultrasonography specialists”) 48 (40; 62)%. Difference also were significantly (p = 0,04).Conclusion:Thus, despite better preparedness of rheumatologist, motivation to study MSUS prevails among radiologists. It is necessary to actively introduce MSUS into general rheumatologic educational programs in order to motivate rheumatologists to study MSUS. Changes in professional standard will also encourage wide use of MSUS by rheumatologists.Disclosure of Interests:None declared