Aim. Presentation of the assumptions of the new definition of physical activity and their consequences for the interpretation of the essence and the measurement of its category and components.
Material and methods. Unobtrusive research, content analysis, narrative review
Results. Based on the review of the positions of American methodologists of behavioral epidemiology on the definition of physical activity attention was drawn to its new approach, alternative to that created in the 1980s.The detailed analysis of the model of the structure of physical activity, built on the assumptions of the new definition, allowed to indicate its innovativeness and consequences for: interpretation of its essence (as behaviour) and for the quantitative or qualitative measurement of the components of the structures of the new model: behaviour, human movement, exercise, physical fitness, fitness in terms of health (health related fitness, H-RF).
Conclusions.
1. The new concept of the definition of physical activity deserves wider popularization outside the American continent because it is the result of the experience and broad scientific discussion of outstanding representatives of behavioral epidemiology, the leading American scientific trend, creating methodological foundations for research on obesity and other civilization diseases, health training and physical education.
2. Regardless of the existing barriers (most often mental) in the adoption of new concepts by supporters of the concept of physical activity, in the sense of movement or physical fitness, and despite the well-established positions of traditionalists regarding changes in the methods of promoting physical activity and participation in the broadly understood physical culture, the logical nature of the theoretical foundations and pedagogical pragmatism, supported by research results, suggests that in the matter of adopting a new concept of human movement and methods of studying motor behavior, one should strive to challenge the regularities found by Dutch researchers (Kemper and Van Mechelen) with regard to the acceptance of American physical fitness tests in the past: In Europe, the development of fitness tests followed the Americans, with a delay of 20 years. [1].