The Dutch Objective Burden Inventory: Validity and Reliability in a Canadian Population of Caregivers for People with Heart Failure

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 234-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Makdessi ◽  
Karen Harkness ◽  
Marie Louise Luttik ◽  
Robert S. McKelvie
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Caregiver Burden ◽  
Missing Values ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Canadian Population ◽  
Objective Burden ◽  
Disease Specific

Evidence suggests that caregivers of people with heart failure (HF) often experience caregiver burden and emotional distress. However, these studies measured the caregiving experience using generic tools since a disease-specific tool was not available. Recently, the Dutch Objective Burden Inventory (DOBI) was developed as a disease-specific tool measuring objective caregiver burden in a Dutch HF population of caregivers. Using a cross-sectional design, caregivers of HF patients attending an outpatient HF clinic completed the DOBI, the Hosptial Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA). Caregivers (n=47) were mainly female (72%) and spouses (72%) of the HF patients with a mean age of 63.1 (±10.4) years. Patients were older (mean age 72.7; ±10.6), 64% male and had advanced HF. Feasibility for the objective portion of the DOBI was excellent with <10% missing values. The subjective component of the DOBI was incomplete and could not be used in the analyses. Seven items had minimal variability. Significant relationships emerged between the DOBI, CRA and HADS revealing construct validity for all subscales of the DOBI. Cronbach's alpha was >.80 for all DOBI subscales. The DOBI is the only disease-specific tool that measures burden for caregivers of HF patients. The objective portion of the DOBI showed evidence of adequate internal consistency and construct validity in a Canadian population of caregivers of HF patients attending a HF Clinic. Further testing is needed to determine floor and ceiling effects for DOBI items and responsiveness of this tool.

The Measurement of Uncertainty in Caregivers of Patients With Heart Failure

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Harkness ◽  
Heather Arthur ◽  
Robert McKelvie
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Financial Burden ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Good Internal Consistency

Background and Purpose: Family caregivers of heart failure (HF) patients describe feelings of uncertainty; however, studies measuring uncertainty in caregivers of HF patients are extremely sparse. This study examined the validity and reliability of the Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale-Family Member form (PPUS-FM) in caregivers of HF patients. Methods: Caregivers (n = 50) of community-dwelling HF patients completed the PPUS-FM, Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in this cross-sectional study. Results: Significant correlations emerged among PPUS-FM and (a) CRA-schedule burden (r = .499, p < .01); (b) CRA-financial burden (r = .292, p < .05); (c) CRA-family burden (r = .385, p < .01); (d) CRA-health burden (r = .421; p < .01); and (e) HADS-depression scores (r = −.298, p < .05). Cronbach’s alpha for the PPUS-FM was .89. Conclusions: In this sample, the PPUS-FM had some evidence of construct validity and good internal consistency. However, the respondent burden and unidimensional nature of the PPUS-FM suggest that this tool needs further revision and testing for use with caregivers of HF patients.

Psychometric Properties of the Persian Adaptation of Mini-Cog Test in Iranian Older Adults

2017 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 266-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Rezaei ◽  
Vahid Rashedi ◽  
Gohar Lotfi ◽  
Peymaneh Shirinbayan ◽  
Mahshid Foroughan
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Geriatric Depression Scale ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Roc Curve Analysis ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Mental Test Score ◽  
Persian Version ◽  
People With Dementia

The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Mini-Cog in Iranian older adults. It was a cross-sectional study; 50 older people with dementia and 50 without dementia who matched for age, gender, and education entered the study. The diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders criteria for dementia were used as gold standard. A battery of scales included the abbreviated mental test score (AMTS), the Geriatric Depression Scale, and the Mini-Cog was performed. Validity and reliability of the Mini-Cog determined using the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (Pearson’s r), Cronbach’s alpha, and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The Persian version of Mini-Cog showed a good inter-rater reliability ( K = 0.76, p < .01) and a positive concurrent validity ( r = 0.39, p < .01) with the AMTS. The sensitivity and specificity were 88% and 62.8%, respectively, using the original cutoff point of 2. The findings showed that the Persian version of Mini-Cog have an acceptable sensitivity, specificity, and substantial overall agreement with the AMTS.

Caregiver burden of patients with heart failure with a left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than or equal to 60%: a cross-sectional survey in the EU

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Lahoz ◽  
S Corda ◽  
C Proudfoot ◽  
A.F Fonseca ◽  
S Cotton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Caregiver Burden ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Private Company ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure

Abstract Background and purpose The majority of patients with heart failure (HF) have difficulties in independently carrying out activities of daily living and hence, require support from caregivers (CGs). This study assessed the quality of life (QoL) of CGs of HF patients with sub-normal LVEF (≤60%). Methods A cross-sectional survey of HF patients and their CGs was conducted in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK. Cardiologists and primary care physicians completed patient record forms (PRF) between June and November 2019. Caregivers of the same patients were invited to complete a caregiver self-completion survey, which included the Family Caregiver QoL Scale (FAMQOL) and EQ-5D. Patient demographics were derived from PRFs. Results 361 CGs (73.1% female, mean age: 58.8 yrs) and HF patients (39.9% female, mean age: 71.2 yrs) were included. 58.2% of the CGs were spouses, 23.4% a child of the patient. On average, CGs devoted 20 hrs/week in the care of HF patients; this CG time increased from 12 to 26 hrs/week with NYHA class I to III/IV of the HF patient. Further, anxiety/stress was experienced overall by 29/31% of CGs which increased from 27/17% for NYHA I to 40/41% for NYHA III/IV of the HF patient (Table 1). Conclusions Caregivers of patients with HF and LVEF ≤60% spend a significant amount of time to provide daily support to HF patients. Patients with progressive disease were older, more polymorbid and had a higher disease duration. These factors likely contributed towards increased caregiver burden of HF patients with increased NYHA class. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Novartis Pharma AG

Farsi version of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory: validity and reliability study among Iranian elderly with dementia

2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed Kazem Malakouti ◽  
Lili Panaghi ◽  
Mahshid Foroughan ◽  
Masoumeh Salehi ◽  
Taher Zandi
Keyword(s):  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Concurrent Validity ◽  
Negative Symptoms ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Neuropsychiatric Inventory ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Rater Reliability ◽  
Farsi Version

ABSTRACTBackground: This study aimed to validate the Farsi version of Neuropsychiatric Inventory (F-NPI), with the aim of promoting clinical assessment and local research on evaluation of neuropsychiatric symptom profiles of individuals with dementia in Iran.Methods: In this cross-sectional, psychometric study, 100 patients with dementia in the age range of 60–90 years participated. Two trained psychiatrists interviewed the study subjects. Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS) and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) were used to determine the concurrent validity. Test-retest, inter-rater reliability and internal consistency were calculated. Discrimination validity was determined, using a matched control group consisting of 49 participants without dementia. Cronbach's α and Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to analyze the data.Results: The internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.9) was excellent. The inter-rater reliability varied between 0.6 and 0.98 for frequency, severity and total scale of the F-NPI, and test-retest reliability was between 0.4 and 0.96. Concurrent validity varied between 0.3 and 0.9 (P < 0.05). The most prevalent symptom was “apathy” and the least prevalent was “euphoria”.Conclusion: The Farsi version of NPI has satisfactory psychometric indexes and is applicable for clinical and study works in Iranian community.

scholarly journals The Farsi translation, reliability and validity of the Death Concern Scale

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahboubeh Dadfar ◽  
David Lester
Keyword(s):  
Depression Scale ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Negative Evaluation ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Farsi Version

Abstract Introduction: Death concern is a conscious contemplation of the reality of death combined with a negative evaluation of that reality. The Death Concern Scale (DCS) is related to thinking, and death fear or anxiety about death. The aim of the present study was to develop a Farsi version of the DCS and to explore its psychometric properties in a sample of Iranian nurses. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to investigate the reliability, validity, and factorial structure of the Farsi version of the DCS in a convenience sample of 106 Iranian nurses in two hospitals in Tehran, Iran. The nurses completed the DCS, the Collett-Lester Fear of Death Scale (CLFDS), the Death Anxiety Scale (DAS), the Reasons for Death Fear Scale (RDFS), the Death Depression Scale (DDS), and the Death Obsession Scale (DOS). Results: For the DCS, Cronbach's α was 0.77, the Spearman-Brown coefficient 0.63, the Guttman split-half coefficient 0.62, and two-week test-retest reliability 0.77. The DCS correlated at 0.51 with the CLFDS, 0.52 with the DAS, 0.34 with the RDFS, 0.40 with the DDS, and 0.48 with the DOS, indicating good construct and criterion-related validity. The results of an exploratory factor analysis for the DCS identified seven factors, accounting for 64.30% of the variance and indicating considerable heterogeneity in the content of the items. Conclusions: The Farsi version of the DCS has good validity and reliability, and it can be used in clinical, educational, and research settings to assess death concerns in the Iranian society.

scholarly journals Feasibility of the Schizophrenia Hope Scale-9: A psychometric study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwisoon Choe ◽  
Eunjung Ryu ◽  
Sunghee Kim
Keyword(s):  
Construct Validity ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Extraction Methods ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Mental Health Centers ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Persons With Schizophrenia

Hope is important in the rehabilitation of persons with schizophrenia, through scales to measure hope are not appropriate for this population. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to identify the psychometric properties of the Schizophrenia Hope Scale-9 (SHS-9) using data from 83 people with schizophrenia in four mental health centers and 762 healthy persons from two universities in South Korea. The mean (standard deviation) SHS-9 score of the participants with schizophrenia and healthy participants was 11.24 (4.90) and 14.83 (3.10), respectively. Lower scores indicate a lower level of hope. The internal consistency alpha coefficient was 0.92 with a 4-week test-retest reliability of 0.89. Criterion-related construct validity was established by examining the correlation between the SHS-9 and the State-Trait Hope Inventory scores. Divergent validity was identified through a negative relationship of SHS-9 with the Beck Hopelessness Scale. The construct validity of the SHS-9 was confirmed through principal component analysis with extraction methods, which resulted in a one-factor solution, accounting for 49–60% of the total item variance.. This study provided evidence for the validity and reliability of the SHS-9; therefore, it could be used to measure hope in people with schizophrenia.

scholarly journals The Self-Stigma of Depression Scale: Translation and Validation of the Arabic Version

2017 ◽  
Vol 08 (01) ◽  
pp. 096-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hussain Ahmed Darraj ◽  
Mohamed Salih Mahfouz ◽  
Rashad Mohamed Al Sanosi ◽  
Mohammed Badedi ◽  
Abdullah Sabai
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Face Validity ◽  
Arabic Version ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Similar Factor

ABSTRACT Background: Self-stigma may feature strongly and be detrimental for people with depression, but the understanding of its nature and prevalence is limited by the lack of psychometrically validated measures. This study is aimed to validate the Arabic version self-stigma of depression scale (SSDS) among adolescents. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study involved 100 adolescents randomly selected. The analyses include face validation, factor analysis, and reliability testing. A test–retest was conducted within a 2-week interval. Results: The mean score for self-stigma of depression among study participants was 68.9 (Standard deviation = 8.76) median equal to 71 and range was 47. Descriptive analysis showed that the percentage of those who scored below the mean score (41.7%) is shown less than those who scored above the mean score (58.3%). Preliminary construct validation analysis confirmed that factor analysis was appropriate for the Arabic-translated version of the SSDS. Furthermore, the factor analysis showed similar factor loadings to the original English version. The total internal consistency of the translated version, which was measured by Cronbach's alphas ranged from 0.70 to 0.77 for the four subscales and 0.84 for the total scale. Test–retest reliability was assessed in 65 respondents after 2 weeks. Cronbach's alphas ranged from 0.70 to 0.77 for the four subscales and 0.84 for the total scale. Conclusions: Face validity, construct validity, and reliability analysis were found satisfactory for the Arabic-translated version of the SSDS. The Arabic-translated version of the SSDS was found valid and reliable to be used in future studies, with comparable properties to the original version and to previous studies.

Construct validity of the enfranchisement scale of the community participation indicators

2021 ◽  
pp. 026921552110409
Author(s):  
Jessica Kersey ◽  
Lauren Terhorst ◽  
Allen W Heinemann ◽  
Joy Hammel ◽  
Carolyn Baum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Construct Validity ◽  
Community Participation ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Missing Values ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Cord Injury

Objective: This study examined the construct validity of the Enfranchisement scale of the Community Participation Indicators. Design: We conducted a secondary analysis of data collected in a cross-sectional study of rehabilitation outcomes. Subjects: The parent study included 604 community-dwelling adults with chronic traumatic brain injury, stroke, or spinal cord injury. The sample had a mean age of 64.1 years, was two-thirds male, and included a high proportion of racial minorities ( n = 250, 41.4%). Main measures: The Enfranchisement scale contains two subscales: the Control subscale and the Importance subscale. We examined correlations between each Enfranchisement subscale and measures of participation, environment, and impairments. The current analyses included cases with at least 80% of items completed on each subscale (Control subscale: n = 391; Importance subscale: n = 219). Missing values were imputed using multiple imputation. Results: The sample demonstrated high scores, indicating poor enfranchisement (Control subscale: M = 51.7; Importance subscale: M = 43.0). Both subscales were most strongly associated with measures of participation (Control subscale: r = 0.56; Importance subscale: r = 0.52), and least strongly associated with measures of cognition (Control subscale: r = 0.03; Importance subscale: r = 0.03). The Importance subscale was closely associated with depression ( r = 0.54), and systems, services, and policies ( r = 0.50). Both subscales were associated with social attitudes (Control subscale: r = 0.44; Importance subscale: r = 0.44) and social support (Control subscale: r = 0.49; Importance subscale: r = 0.41). Conclusions: We found evidence of convergent validity between the Enfranchisement scale and measures of participation, and discriminant validity between the Enfranchisement scale and measures of disability-related impairments. The analyses also revealed the importance of the environment to enfranchisement outcomes.

Construct Validity and Reliability of the Beliefs Toward Mental Illness Scale for American, Japanese, and Korean Women

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 349-363
Author(s):  
Denise M. Saint Arnault ◽  
Moonhee Gang ◽  
Seoyoon Woo
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Mental Illness ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Help Seeking ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Item Analysis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Cross Sectional

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Beliefs Toward Mental Illness Scale (BMI) across women from the United States, Japan, and South Korea. Methods: A cross-sectional study design was employed. The sample was 564 women aged 21–64 years old who were recruited in the United States and Korea (American = 127, Japanese immigrants in the United States = 204, and Korean = 233). We carried out item analysis, construct validity by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and internal consistency using SPSS Version 22 and AMOS Version 22. Results: An acceptable model fit for a 20-item BMI (Beliefs Toward Mental Illness Scale–Revised [BMI-R]) with 3 factors was confirmed using CFA. Construct validity of the BMI-R showed to be all acceptable; convergent validity (average variance extracted [AVE] ≥0.5, construct reliability [CR] ≥0.7) and discriminant validity (r = .65–.89, AVE >.79). The Cronbach’s alpha of the BMI-R was .92. Conclusion: These results showed that the BMI was a reliable tool to study beliefs about mental illness across cultures. Our findings also suggested that continued efforts to reduce stigma in culturally specific contexts within and between countries are necessary to promote help-seeking for those suffering from psychological distress.

Mutuality and heart failure self-care in patients and their informal caregivers

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie A Hooker ◽  
Sarah J Schmiege ◽  
Ranak B Trivedi ◽  
Nicole R Amoyal ◽  
David B Bekelman
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Caregiver Burden ◽  
Regression Models ◽  
Salt Intake ◽  
Self Care ◽  
Psychosocial Care ◽  
Path Model ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Perceived Burden

Background: Heart failure is a progressive condition characterized by frequent hospitalizations for exacerbated symptoms. Informal family caregivers may help patients improve self-care, which may in turn reduce hospitalizations. However, little is known about how mutuality, defined as the quality of the patient–caregiver relationship, and caregiver burden affect self-care. Objective: This study examines the associations among mutuality, patient self-care confidence (beliefs in abilities to engage in self-care behaviors) and maintenance (behaviors such as medication adherence, activity, and low salt intake), caregiver confidence in and maintenance of patient care, and caregiver perceived burden. Methods: This study used cross-sectional baseline data from a multi-site randomized clinical trial of a symptom and psychosocial care intervention. Patient–caregiver dyads ( N=99) completed self-report surveys of mutuality and self-care confidence and maintenance, and caregivers completed a measure of caregiver burden. Path analysis, with actor (effects within a person) partner (effects across the dyad) interdependence model paths and regression models were used to examine the associations among mutuality, caregiver burden, and self-care. Results: The majority of patients ( M age=66, 21% female) and caregivers ( M age=57, 81% female) were spouses (60%). The path model demonstrated significant actor effects; patients and caregivers with better mutuality were more confident in patient self-care ( p<.05). Partner effects were not significant. Regression models indicated that caregivers with greater mutuality reported less perceived burden ( p<.01). Conclusions: Mutuality in patient–caregiver dyads is associated with patient self-care and caregiver burden and may be an important intervention target to improve self-care and reduce hospitalizations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document