scholarly journals Experimental and computational analyses reveal dynamics of tumor vessel cooption and optimal treatment strategies

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (7) ◽  
pp. 2662-2671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chrysovalantis Voutouri ◽  
Nathaniel D. Kirkpatrick ◽  
Euiheon Chung ◽  
Fotios Mpekris ◽  
James W. Baish ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Progression ◽  
Antiangiogenic Therapy ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Tumor Evolution ◽  
Combination Therapies ◽  
Tumor Vessel ◽  
Antiangiogenic Treatment ◽  
Antiangiogenic Drugs ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms ◽  
Computational Analyses

Cooption of the host vasculature is a strategy that some cancers use to sustain tumor progression without—or before—angiogenesis or in response to antiangiogenic therapy. Facilitated by certain growth factors, cooption can mediate tumor infiltration and confer resistance to antiangiogenic drugs. Unfortunately, this mode of tumor progression is difficult to target because the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. Here, we analyzed the dynamics of vessel cooption during tumor progression and in response to antiangiogenic treatment in gliomas and brain metastases. We followed tumor evolution during escape from antiangiogenic treatment as cancer cells coopted, and apparently mechanically compressed, host vessels. To gain deeper understanding, we developed a mathematical model, which incorporated compression of coopted vessels, resulting in hypoxia and formation of new vessels by angiogenesis. Even if antiangiogenic therapy can block such secondary angiogenesis, the tumor can sustain itself by coopting existing vessels. Hence, tumor progression can only be stopped by combination therapies that judiciously block both angiogenesis and cooption. Furthermore, the model suggests that sequential blockade is likely to be more beneficial than simultaneous blockade.

scholarly journals Metabolic Reprogramming of Cancer Cells during Tumor Progression and Metastasis

Metabolites ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 28
Author(s):  
Kenji Ohshima ◽  
Eiichi Morii
Keyword(s):  
Oxidative Stress ◽  
Tumor Progression ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Cancer Progression ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Primary Site ◽  
Metabolic Reprogramming ◽  
Cancer Growth ◽  
Anchorage Independent Growth ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms

Cancer cells face various metabolic challenges during tumor progression, including growth in the nutrient-altered and oxygen-deficient microenvironment of the primary site, intravasation into vessels where anchorage-independent growth is required, and colonization of distant organs where the environment is distinct from that of the primary site. Thus, cancer cells must reprogram their metabolic state in every step of cancer progression. Metabolic reprogramming is now recognized as a hallmark of cancer cells and supports cancer growth. Elucidating the underlying mechanisms of metabolic reprogramming in cancer cells may help identifying cancer targets and treatment strategies. This review summarizes our current understanding of metabolic reprogramming during cancer progression and metastasis, including cancer cell adaptation to the tumor microenvironment, defense against oxidative stress during anchorage-independent growth in vessels, and metabolic reprogramming during metastasis.

Targeting Tumour Metastasis: The Emerging Role of Nanotechnology

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 1367-1381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Visentin ◽  
Mirela Sedić ◽  
Sandra Kraljević Pavelić ◽  
Krešimir Pavelić
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Progression ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Metastatic Progression ◽  
Therapeutic Concept ◽  
Molecular Alterations ◽  
Tumour Metastasis ◽  
Metastatic Cells ◽  
Metastatic Process ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms

The metastatic process has still not been completely elucidated, probably due to insufficient knowledge of the underlying mechanisms. Here, we provide an overview of the current findings that shed light on specific molecular alterations associated with metastasis and present novel concepts in the treatment of the metastatic process. In particular, we discuss novel pharmacological approaches in the clinical setting that target metastatic progression. New insights into the process of metastasis allow optimisation and design of new treatment strategies, especially in view of the fact that metastatic cells share common features with stem cells. Nano- and micro-technologies are herein elaborated in details as a promising therapeutic concept in targeted drug delivery for metastatic cancer. Progression in the field could provide a more efficient way to tackle metastasis and thus bring about advancements in the treatment and management of patients with advanced cancer.

scholarly journals Finding an easy way to harmonize: a review of advances in clinical research and combination strategies of EZH2 inhibitors

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Li ◽  
Yan Wang ◽  
Yueqing Gong ◽  
Tengrui Zhang ◽  
Jiaqi Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Preclinical Studies ◽  
Combination Therapies ◽  
Tumor Treatment ◽  
Antitumor Effects ◽  
Therapeutic Modalities ◽  
Combination Strategies ◽  
Anti Cancer ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms ◽  
The Individual

AbstractEnhancer of zeste homolog 2 inhibitors (EZH2i) have garnered increased attention owing to their anticancer activity by targeting EZH2, a well-known cancer-promoting factor. However, some lymphomas are resistant to EZH2i, and EZH2i treatment alone is ineffective in case of EZH2-overexpressing solid tumors. The anti-cancer efficacy of EZH2i may be improved through safe and effective combinations of these drugs with other treatment modalities. Preclinical evidence indicates that combining EZH2i with other therapies, such as immunotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and endocrine therapy, has complementary or synergistic antitumor effects. Therefore, elucidating the underlying mechanisms of the individual constituents of the combination therapies is fundamental for their clinical application. In this review, we have summarized notable clinical trials and preclinical studies using EZH2i, their progress, and combinations of EZH2i with different therapeutic modalities, aiming to provide new insights for tumor treatment.

scholarly journals LOX-1 and cancer: an indissoluble liaison

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Murdocca ◽  
C. De Masi ◽  
S. Pucci ◽  
R. Mango ◽  
G. Novelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Progression ◽  
Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition ◽  
Vascular Endothelial Cells ◽  
Transition Process ◽  
Receptor Protein ◽  
Pancreatic Tumors ◽  
Tumor Evolution ◽  
Mesenchymal Transition ◽  
Angiogenic Proteins

AbstractRecently, a strong correlation between metabolic disorders, tumor onset, and progression has been demonstrated, directing new therapeutic strategies on metabolic targets. OLR1 gene encodes the LOX-1 receptor protein, responsible for the recognition, binding, and internalization of ox-LDL. In the past, several studied, aimed to clarify the role of LOX-1 receptor in atherosclerosis, shed light on its role in the stimulation of the expression of adhesion molecules, pro-inflammatory signaling pathways, and pro-angiogenic proteins, including NF-kB and VEGF, in vascular endothelial cells and macrophages. In recent years, LOX-1 upregulation in different tumors evidenced its involvement in cancer onset, progression and metastasis. In this review, we outline the role of LOX-1 in tumor spreading and metastasis, evidencing its function in VEGF induction, HIF-1alpha activation, and MMP-9/MMP-2 expression, pushing up the neoangiogenic and the epithelial–mesenchymal transition process in glioblastoma, osteosarcoma prostate, colon, breast, lung, and pancreatic tumors. Moreover, our studies contributed to evidence its role in interacting with WNT/APC/β-catenin axis, highlighting new pathways in sporadic colon cancer onset. The application of volatilome analysis in high expressing LOX-1 tumor-bearing mice correlates with the tumor evolution, suggesting a closed link between LOX-1 upregulation and metabolic changes in individual volatile compounds and thus providing a viable method for a simple, non-invasive alternative monitoring of tumor progression. These findings underline the role of LOX-1 as regulator of tumor progression, migration, invasion, metastasis formation, and tumor-related neo-angiogenesis, proposing this receptor as a promising therapeutic target and thus enhancing current antineoplastic strategies.

scholarly journals ABL001, a Bispecific Antibody Targeting VEGF and DLL4, with Chemotherapy, Synergistically Inhibits Tumor Progression in Xenograft Models

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 241
Author(s):  
Dong-Hoon Yeom ◽  
Yo-Seob Lee ◽  
Ilhwan Ryu ◽  
Sunju Lee ◽  
Byungje Sung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Tumor Progression ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Bispecific Antibody ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Tumor Vessel ◽  
Vegf Inhibitors ◽  
Xenograft Models ◽  
Antibody Targeting

Delta-like-ligand 4 (DLL4) is a promising target to augment the effects of VEGF inhibitors. A simultaneous blockade of VEGF/VEGFR and DLL4/Notch signaling pathways leads to more potent anti-cancer effects by synergistic anti-angiogenic mechanisms in xenograft models. A bispecific antibody targeting VEGF and DLL4 (ABL001/NOV1501/TR009) demonstrates more potent in vitro and in vivo biological activity compared to VEGF or DLL4 targeting monoclonal antibodies alone and is currently being evaluated in a phase 1 clinical study of heavy chemotherapy or targeted therapy pre-treated cancer patients (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03292783). However, the effects of a combination of ABL001 and chemotherapy on tumor vessels and tumors are not known. Hence, the effects of ABL001, with or without paclitaxel and irinotecan were evaluated in human gastric or colon cancer xenograft models. The combination treatment synergistically inhibited tumor progression compared to each monotherapy. More tumor vessel regression and apoptotic tumor cell induction were observed in tumors treated with the combination therapy, which might be due to tumor vessel normalization. Overall, these findings suggest that the combination therapy of ABL001 with paclitaxel or irinotecan would be a better clinical strategy for the treatment of cancer patients.

scholarly journals Roles of tumor-associated macrophages in tumor progression: implications on therapeutic strategies

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shangli Zhu ◽  
Ming Yi ◽  
Yuze Wu ◽  
Bing Dong ◽  
Kongming Wu
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Progression ◽  
Tumor Development ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Therapeutic Strategies ◽  
Tumor Associated Macrophages ◽  
Promising Target ◽  
Multiple Processes ◽  
Enhance Tumor Cell ◽  
Patient Prognosis ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

AbstractMacrophages are heterogeneous cells that present as different functional phenotypes due to their plasticity. They can be classified into two categories, namely M1- and M2-like macrophages, which are involved in processes as diverse as anti-tumor activity and immunosuppressive tumor promotion. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are defined as being of an M2-type and are considered as the active component in tumor microenvironment. TAMs are involved in multiple processes of tumor progression through the expression of cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, protein hydrolases and more, which lead to enhance tumor cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and immunosuppression, which in turn supports invasion and metastasis. It is assumed that the abundance of TAMs in major solid tumors is correlated to a negative patient prognosis. Because of the currently available data of the TAMs’ role in tumor development, these cells have emerged as a promising target for novel cancer treatment strategies. In this paper, we will briefly describe the origins and types of TAMs and will try to comprehensively show how TAMs contribute to tumorigenesis and disease progression. Finally, we will present the main TAM-based therapeutic strategies currently available.

scholarly journals Antiangiogenic therapy for breast cancer with triple negative phenotype

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-92
Author(s):  
Inna P. Ganshina ◽  
Kristina A. Ivanova ◽  
Olga O. Gordeeva ◽  
Aleksandr V. Arkhipov ◽  
Liudmila G. Zhukova
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Antiangiogenic Therapy ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Her 2 ◽  
Triple Negative Phenotype ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Negative Phenotype

Triple-negative breast cancer is 1024% of all cases of breast cancer and is characterized by the absence of estrogen, progesterone, and HER-2 receptors in the tumor. The therapy of this illness is a difficult clinical case. In contrast to hormone-positive and HER-2-positive phenotypes, in which we successfully use targeted drugs (antiestrogens and anti-HER-2 drugs), for triple-negative breast cancer we have not had such targets for a long time. Thus, despite the impressive results of immunotherapy of triple-negative breast cancer, there remains a fairly large group of patients with negative PD-L1 status, for whom it is necessary to develop other treatment strategies. One of the approaches in the treatment of malignant tumors includes not the impact on tumor cells, but the process of angiogenesis. Antiangiogenic drugs have positively proven themselves in the treatment of a large number of malignant tumors but are underestimated for breast cancer (including triple-negative phenotype). The use of bevacizumab in combinations with cytostatic drugs in breast cancer therapy (including triple-negative breast cancer) has been studied in a large number of clinical trials but was undeservedly forgotten in some countries due to the revoked FDA registration. This review presents the role of bevacizumab in the treatment of patients with triple-negative breast cancer and suggests the conditions when the administration of this drug is justified and leads to better results.

scholarly journals Current and Future Treatments in Alzheimer Disease: An Update

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 117957352090739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantina G Yiannopoulou ◽  
Sokratis G Papageorgiou
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer Disease ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Neurofibrillary Tangle ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Specific Treatment ◽  
Amyloid Β ◽  
Cell Therapies ◽  
Novel Biomarkers ◽  
Disease Modifying ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms

Disease-modifying treatment strategies for Alzheimer disease (AD) are still under extensive research. Nowadays, only symptomatic treatments exist for this disease, all trying to counterbalance the neurotransmitter disturbance: 3 cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine. To block the progression of the disease, therapeutic agents are supposed to interfere with the pathogenic steps responsible for the clinical symptoms, classically including the deposition of extracellular amyloid β plaques and intracellular neurofibrillary tangle formation. Other underlying mechanisms are targeted by neuroprotective, anti-inflammatory, growth factor promotive, metabolic efficacious agents and stem cell therapies. Recent therapies have integrated multiple new features such as novel biomarkers, new neuropsychological outcomes, enrollment of earlier populations in the course of the disease, and innovative trial designs. In the near future different specific agents for every patient might be used in a “precision medicine” context, where aberrant biomarkers accompanied with a particular pattern of neuropsychological and neuroimaging findings could determine a specific treatment regimen within a customized therapeutic framework. In this review, we discuss potential disease-modifying therapies that are currently being studied and potential individualized therapeutic frameworks that can be proved beneficial for patients with AD.

Antiangiogenic Therapy of Cerebral Melanoma Metastases Results in Sustained Tumor Progression via Vessel Co-Option

2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (18) ◽  
pp. 6222-6230 ◽  
Author(s):  
William P. J. Leenders ◽  
Benno Küsters ◽  
Kiek Verrijp ◽  
Cathy Maass ◽  
Pieter Wesseling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Progression ◽  
Antiangiogenic Therapy ◽  
Melanoma Metastases

scholarly journals The Angiopoietin-2 and TIE Pathway as a Therapeutic Target for Enhancing Antiangiogenic Therapy and Immunotherapy in Patients with Advanced Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (22) ◽  
pp. 8689
Author(s):  
Alessandra Leong ◽  
Minah Kim
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Treatment Efficacy ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Antiangiogenic Therapy ◽  
Vascular Changes ◽  
Therapeutic Success ◽  
Tumor Immune Evasion ◽  
Vegf Signaling ◽  
Antiangiogenic Drugs ◽  
Angiopoietin 2

Despite significant advances made in cancer treatment, the development of therapeutic resistance to anticancer drugs represents a major clinical problem that limits treatment efficacy for cancer patients. Herein, we focus on the response and resistance to current antiangiogenic drugs and immunotherapies and describe potential strategies for improved treatment outcomes. Antiangiogenic treatments that mainly target vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling have shown efficacy in many types of cancer. However, drug resistance, characterized by disease recurrence, has limited therapeutic success and thus increased our urgency to better understand the mechanism of resistance to inhibitors of VEGF signaling. Moreover, cancer immunotherapies including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which stimulate antitumor immunity, have also demonstrated a remarkable clinical benefit in the treatment of many aggressive malignancies. Nevertheless, the emergence of resistance to immunotherapies associated with an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment has restricted therapeutic response, necessitating the development of better therapeutic strategies to increase treatment efficacy in patients. Angiopoietin-2 (ANG2), which binds to the receptor tyrosine kinase TIE2 in endothelial cells, is a cooperative driver of angiogenesis and vascular destabilization along with VEGF. It has been suggested in multiple preclinical studies that ANG2-mediated vascular changes contribute to the development and persistence of resistance to anti-VEGF therapy. Further, emerging evidence suggests a fundamental link between vascular abnormalities and tumor immune evasion, supporting the rationale for combination strategies of immunotherapy with antiangiogenic drugs. In this review, we discuss the recent mechanistic and clinical advances in targeting angiopoietin signaling, focusing on ANG2 inhibition, to enhance therapeutic efficacy of antiangiogenic and ICI therapies. In short, we propose that a better mechanistic understanding of ANG2-mediated vascular changes will provide insight into the significance of ANG2 in treatment response and resistance to current antiangiogenic and ICI therapies. These advances will ultimately improve therapeutic modalities for cancer treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document