Assessing Patient Satisfaction Following Blepharoplasty Using Social Media Reviews
Abstract Background As patient satisfaction is a significant qualitative consideration in measuring aesthetic surgery outcome, it is important to characterize the individual factors which shape the patient perspective about blepharoplasty. Objectives This study analyzed patient reviews following blepharoplasty on the aesthetic surgery social media platform Realself.com to determine which aspects of the surgical process have the most significant impact on patient satisfaction. Methods Blepharoplasty reviews were gathered from Realself.com using an automated web crawler. These reviews were characterized as positive or negative, then given a specific category that more specifically defined the theme of the review. Additional variables including the specialty of the reviewed physician and any patient self-reported ratings were documented. Results A total of 1991 reviews pertaining to blepharoplasty were collected. Among reviews with self-reported “worth it” ratings, 93.5% were positive. Following categorization of all reviews, 1865 (93.7%) were positive and 126 (6.3%) were negative. Of the positive reviews, the most common overall themes were bedside manner (n=899, 48.2%), aesthetic result (n=859, 46.1%), and overall comfort (n=58, 3.1%). Among negative reviews, most pertained to aesthetic result (n=100, 79.4%), and bedside manner (n=14, 11.1%). The most frequently encountered physician specialties performing blepharoplasty were plastic surgery (n=1101, 55.3%), ophthalmology (n=634, 31.8%), and otolaryngology (n=69, 3.5%). Conclusions The majority of patient blepharoplasty reviews were positive. The most prominent factor driving positive reviews was bedside manner, followed by aesthetic results. Negative reviews were most frequently attributed to sub-optimal aesthetic results. Most blepharoplasties in our study cohort were performed by plastic and oculoplastic surgeons.