Development: Pattern and Process
In a hierarchical system, the manifestations of pattern at one level tend to become the components of process at the next, an alternation that is repeated again and again. The processes of molecular genetics produce, under the special circumstances applying at the genomic level, a pattern of gene activity that is carried forward to the organism level. Here new developmental processes based on these gene-level patterns build new organism-level patterns, and these then become the raw material for deme-level processes acting at the next level. This duality of pattern and process operates in any interactive system and was addressed particularly by Gregory Bateson (1979). It requires that we discuss the phenomena of process and pattern separately, as well as discovering their interdependence especially when, as in biological systems, there is additional complexity present in the form of feedback of causations among levels. Implicit in any hierarchical analysis is the assumption that process always involves a lawful set of mechanisms. In all biological systems this lawfulness will be derived from two sources: from the immanent properties of the systems themselves, and from even more general laws applying across all biological systems. For example, the salivary glands and lungs of vertebrates are both constructed in part according to a strict set of developmental rules applying to mechanics of epithelia; these are examples of developmental constraints (Chapter 7). But the size and shape of the lungs also follow more general physical rules such as the gas diffusion laws or volume-surface area relationships that determine how big a lung is required for an animal of a given size. These are structure-function constraints. Biological systems also derive a major set of consistencies from the historical connectedness, through relation by descent, of the organisms concerned. These consistencies are often called “phyletic constraints” (Chapter 7). It is a basic approach in biology to use the analysis of pattern to approach an understanding of process, often first in terms of deriving the “rules” from study of consistency and regularity. This is where the great power of the comparative-analytical method lies.