scholarly journals Mediator complex subunit Med19 binds directly GATA DNA-binding zinc finger and functions with Med1 in GATA-driven gene regulation in vivo

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clément Immarigeon ◽  
Sandra Bernat-Fabre ◽  
Emmanuelle Guillou ◽  
Alexis Verger ◽  
Elodie Prince ◽  
...  

AbstractThe evolutionarily-conserved multiprotein Mediator complex (MED) serves as an interface between DNA-bound transcription factors (TFs) and the RNA Polymerase II machinery. It has been proposed that each TF interacts with a dedicated MED subunit to induce specific transcriptional responses. However, binary MED subunit - TF partnerships are probably oversimplified models. Using Drosophila TFs of the GATA family - Pannier (Pnr) and Serpent (Srp) - as a model, we have previously established GATA cofactor evolutionarily-conserved function for the Med1 Mediator subunit. Here, we show that another subunit, Med19, is required for GATA-dependent gene expression and interacts physically with Pnr and Srp in cellulo, in vivo and in vitro through their conserved C-zinc finger (ZF), indicating general GATA co-activator functions. Interestingly, Med19 is critical for the regulation of all tested GATA target genes which is not the case for Med1, suggesting differential use of MED subunits by GATAs depending on the target gene. Lastly, despite their presumed distant position within the MED middle module, both subunits interact physically. In conclusion, our data shed new light first on the MED complex, engaging several subunits to mediate TF-driven transcriptional responses and second, on GATA TFs, showing that ZF DNA-binding domain also serves for transactivation.

2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (39) ◽  
pp. 13617-13629
Author(s):  
Clément Immarigeon ◽  
Sandra Bernat-Fabre ◽  
Emmanuelle Guillou ◽  
Alexis Verger ◽  
Elodie Prince ◽  
...  

The evolutionarily conserved multiprotein Mediator complex (MED) serves as an interface between DNA-bound transcription factors (TFs) and the RNA Pol II machinery. It has been proposed that each TF interacts with a dedicated MED subunit to induce specific transcriptional responses. But are these binary partnerships sufficient to mediate TF functions? We have previously established that the Med1 Mediator subunit serves as a cofactor of GATA TFs in Drosophila, as shown in mammals. Here, we observe mutant phenotype similarities between another subunit, Med19, and the Drosophila GATA TF Pannier (Pnr), suggesting functional interaction. We further show that Med19 physically interacts with the Drosophila GATA TFs, Pnr and Serpent (Srp), in vivo and in vitro through their conserved C-zinc finger domains. Moreover, Med19 loss of function experiments in vivo or in cellulo indicate that it is required for Pnr- and Srp-dependent gene expression, suggesting general GATA cofactor functions. Interestingly, Med19 but not Med1 is critical for the regulation of all tested GATA target genes, implying shared or differential use of MED subunits by GATAs depending on the target gene. Lastly, we show a direct interaction between Med19 and Med1 by GST pulldown experiments indicating privileged contacts between these two subunits of the MED middle module. Together, these findings identify Med19/Med1 as a composite GATA TF interface and suggest that binary MED subunit–TF partnerships are probably oversimplified models. We propose several mechanisms to account for the transcriptional regulation of GATA-targeted genes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (24) ◽  
pp. 9401
Author(s):  
Antonio Bouthelier ◽  
Florinda Meléndez-Rodríguez ◽  
Andrés A. Urrutia ◽  
Julián Aragonés

Cellular response to hypoxia is controlled by the hypoxia-inducible transcription factors HIF1α and HIF2α. Some genes are preferentially induced by HIF1α or HIF2α, as has been explored in some cell models and for particular sets of genes. Here we have extended this analysis to other HIF-dependent genes using in vitro WT8 renal carcinoma cells and in vivo conditional Vhl-deficient mice models. Moreover, we generated chimeric HIF1/2 transcription factors to study the contribution of the HIF1α and HIF2α DNA binding/heterodimerization and transactivation domains to HIF target specificity. We show that the induction of HIF1α-dependent genes in WT8 cells, such as CAIX (CAR9) and BNIP3, requires both halves of HIF, whereas the HIF2α transactivation domain is more relevant for the induction of HIF2 target genes like the amino acid carrier SLC7A5. The HIF selectivity for some genes in WT8 cells is conserved in Vhl-deficient lung and liver tissue, whereas other genes like Glut1 (Slc2a1) behave distinctly in these tissues. Therefore the relative contribution of the DNA binding/heterodimerization and transactivation domains for HIF target selectivity can be different when comparing HIF1α or HIF2α isoforms, and that HIF target gene specificity is conserved in human and mouse cells for some of the genes analyzed.


1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 219-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
F X Claret ◽  
T Antakly ◽  
M Karin ◽  
F Saatcioglu

Thyroid hormone (T3) receptors (T3Rs) are ligand-modulated transcription factors that bind to thyroid hormone response elements (T3REs) and mediate either positive or negative transcriptional regulation of target genes. In addition, in response to ligand binding, T3Rs can interfere with AP-1 activity and thereby inhibit transcription of AP-1-responsive genes. T3Rs were recently shown to form heterodimers with retinoid X receptors (RXRs), leading to increased binding to T3REs in vitro and potentiation of transcriptional responses in vivo. Here we demonstrate that T3R alpha forms stable heterodimers with RXR alpha in living cells. Most important, we describe a new role for RXR alpha in modulating ligand-dependent T3R alpha activity: heterodimerization with RXR alpha greatly increases transcriptional interference with AP-1 activity, augments T3-dependent transcriptional activation, and potentiates the reversal of ligand-independent activation by T3R alpha. In all three cases, the responses occur at substantially lower T3 concentrations when elicited by T3R alpha plus RXR alpha than by T3R alpha alone. In vitro, the binding of T3 decreases the DNA-binding activity of T3R alpha homodimers but does not affect DNA binding by T3R alpha:RXR alpha heterodimers. We provide evidence that increased activities of T3R alpha at lower T3 concentrations are not due to changes in its T3 binding properties. Instead, the altered response could be mediated by either RXR alpha-induced conformational changes, increased stability of heterodimers over homodimers, especially following T3 binding, or both.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  
Narendra Pratap Singh ◽  
Bony De Kumar ◽  
Ariel Paulson ◽  
Mark E. Parrish ◽  
Carrie Scott ◽  
...  

Knowledge of the diverse DNA binding specificities of transcription factors is important for understanding their specific regulatory functions in animal development and evolution. We have examined the genome-wide binding properties of the mouse HOXB1 protein in embryonic stem cells differentiated into neural fates. Unexpectedly, only a small number of HOXB1 bound regions (7%) correlate with binding of the known HOX cofactors PBX and MEIS. In contrast, 22% of the HOXB1 binding peaks display co-occupancy with the transcriptional repressor REST. Analyses revealed that co-binding of HOXB1 with PBX correlates with active histone marks and high levels of expression, while co-occupancy with REST correlates with repressive histone marks and repression of the target genes. Analysis of HOXB1 bound regions uncovered enrichment of a novel 15 base pair HOXB1 binding motif HB1RE (HOXB1 response element). In vitro template binding assays showed that HOXB1, PBX1, and MEIS can bind to this motif. In vivo, this motif is sufficient for direct expression of a reporter gene and over-expression of HOXB1 selectively represses this activity. Our analyses suggest that HOXB1 has evolved an association with REST in gene regulation and the novel HB1RE motif contributes to HOXB1 function in part through a repressive role in gene expression.


2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 2800-2820 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark J. Swanson ◽  
Hongfang Qiu ◽  
Laarni Sumibcay ◽  
Anna Krueger ◽  
Soon-ja Kim ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Transcriptional activators interact with multisubunit coactivators that modify chromatin structure or recruit the general transcriptional machinery to their target genes. Budding yeast cells respond to amino acid starvation by inducing an activator of amino acid biosynthetic genes, Gcn4p. We conducted a comprehensive analysis of viable mutants affecting known coactivator subunits from the Saccharomyces Genome Deletion Project for defects in activation by Gcn4p in vivo. The results confirm previous findings that Gcn4p requires SAGA, SWI/SNF, and SRB mediator (SRB/MED) and identify key nonessential subunits of these complexes required for activation. Among the numerous histone acetyltransferases examined, only that present in SAGA, Gcn5p, was required by Gcn4p. We also uncovered a dependence on CCR4-NOT, RSC, and the Paf1 complex. In vitro binding experiments suggest that the Gcn4p activation domain interacts specifically with CCR4-NOT and RSC in addition to SAGA, SWI/SNF, and SRB/MED. Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments show that Mbf1p, SAGA, SWI/SNF, SRB/MED, RSC, CCR4-NOT, and the Paf1 complex all are recruited by Gcn4p to one of its target genes (ARG1) in vivo. We observed considerable differences in coactivator requirements among several Gcn4p-dependent promoters; thus, only a subset of the array of coactivators that can be recruited by Gcn4p is required at a given target gene in vivo.


2004 ◽  
Vol 279 (50) ◽  
pp. 52183-52190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascale Jackers ◽  
Gabor Szalai ◽  
Omar Moussa ◽  
Dennis K. Watson

Megakaryopoiesis is the process by which hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow differentiate into mature megakaryocytes. The expression of megakaryocytic genes during megakaryopoiesis is controlled by specific transcription factors. Fli-1 and GATA-1 transcription factors are required for development of megakaryocytes and promoter analysis has definedin vitrofunctional binding sites for these factors in several megakaryocytic genes, includingGPIIb,GPIX, andC-MPL. Herein, we utilize chromatin immunoprecipitation to examine the presence of Ets-1, Fli-1, and GATA-1 on these promotersin vivo. Fli-1 and Ets-1 occupy the promoters ofGPIIb,GPIX, andC-MPLgenes in both Meg-01 and CMK11-5 cells. WhereasGPIIbis expressed in both Meg-01 and CMK11-5 cells,GPIXandC-MPLare only expressed in the more differentiated CMK11–5 cells. Thus,in vivooccupancy by an Ets factor is not sufficient to promote transcription of some megakaryocytic genes. GATA-1 and Fli-1 are both expressed in CMK11-5 cells and co-occupy theGPIXandC-MPLpromoters. Transcription of all three megakaryocytic genes is correlated with the presence of acetylated histone H3 and phosphorylated RNA polymerase II on their promoters. We also show that exogenous expression of GATA-1 in Meg-01 cells leads to the expression of endogenous c-mpl and gpIX mRNA. WhereasGPIIb,GPIX, andC-MPLare direct target genes for Fli-1, both Fli-1 and GATA-1 are required for formation of an active transcriptional complex on theC-MPLandGPIXpromotersin vivo. In contrast,GPIIbexpression appears to be independent of GATA-1 in Meg-01 cells.


2009 ◽  
Vol 192 (1) ◽  
pp. 336-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anand Ballal ◽  
Adhar C. Manna

ABSTRACT Thioredoxin reductase (encoded by trxB) protects Staphylococcus aureus against oxygen or disulfide stress and is indispensable for growth. Among the different sarA family mutants analyzed, transcription of trxB was markedly elevated in the sarA mutant under conditions of aerobic as well as microaerophilic growth, indicating that SarA acts as a negative regulator of trxB expression. Gel shift analysis showed that purified SarA protein binds directly to the trxB promoter region DNA in vitro. DNA binding of SarA was essential for repression of trxB transcription in vivo in S. aureus. Northern blot analysis and DNA binding studies of the purified wild-type SarA and the mutant SarAC9G with oxidizing agents indicated that oxidation of Cys-9 reduced the binding of SarA to the trxB promoter DNA. Oxidizing agents, in particular diamide, could further enhance transcription of the trxB gene in the sarA mutant, suggesting the presence of a SarA-independent mode of trxB induction. Analysis of two oxidative stress-responsive sarA regulatory target genes, trxB and sodM, with various mutant sarA constructs showed a differential ability of the SarA to regulate expression of the two above-mentioned genes in vivo. The overall data demonstrate the important role played by SarA in modulating expression of genes involved in oxidative stress resistance in S. aureus.


PPAR Research ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean R. Pyper ◽  
Navin Viswakarma ◽  
Yuzhi Jia ◽  
Yi-Jun Zhu ◽  
Joseph D. Fondell ◽  
...  

The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor- (PPAR) plays a key role in lipid metabolism and energy combustion. Chronic activation of PPAR in rodents leads to the development of hepatocellular carcinomas. The ability of PPAR to induce expression of its target genes depends on Mediator, an evolutionarily conserved complex of cofactors and, in particular, the subunit 1 (Med1) of this complex. Here, we report the identification and characterization of PPAR-interacting cofactor (PRIC)-295 (PRIC295), a novel coactivator protein, and show that it interacts with the Med1 and Med24 subunits of the Mediator complex. PRIC295 contains 10 LXXLL signature motifs that facilitate nuclear receptor binding and interacts with PPAR and five other members of the nuclear receptor superfamily in a ligand-dependent manner. PRIC295 enhances the transactivation function of PPAR, PPAR, and ER. These data demonstrate that PRIC295 interacts with nuclear receptors such as PPAR and functions as a transcription coactivator underin vitroconditions and may play an important role in mediating the effectsin vivoas a member of the PRIC complex with Med1 and Med24.


2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 2919-2933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benoit Grondin ◽  
Martin Lefrancois ◽  
Mathieu Tremblay ◽  
Marianne Saint-Denis ◽  
André Haman ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Transcription factors can function as DNA-binding-specific activators or as coactivators. c-Jun drives gene expression via binding to AP-1 sequences or as a cofactor for PU.1 in macrophages. c-Jun heterodimers bind AP-1 sequences with higher affinity than homodimers, but how c-Jun works as a coactivator is unknown. Here, we provide in vitro and in vivo evidence that c-Jun homodimers are recruited to the interleukin-1β (IL-1β) promoter in the absence of direct DNA binding via protein-protein interactions with DNA-anchored PU.1 and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein β (C/EBPβ). Unexpectedly, the interaction interface with PU.1 and C/EBPβ involves four of the residues within the basic domain of c-Jun that contact DNA, indicating that the capacities of c-Jun to function as a coactivator or as a DNA-bound transcription factor are mutually exclusive. Our observations indicate that the IL-1β locus is occupied by PU.1 and C/EBPβ and poised for expression and that c-Jun enhances transcription by facilitating a rate-limiting step, the assembly of the RNA polymerase II preinitiation complex, with minimal effect on the local chromatin status. We propose that the basic domain of other transcription factors may also be redirected from a DNA interaction mode to a protein-protein interaction mode and that this switch represents a novel mechanism regulating gene expression profiles.


2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (15) ◽  
pp. 5540-5553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yue Liu ◽  
April L. Colosimo ◽  
Xiang-Jiao Yang ◽  
Daiqing Liao

ABSTRACT The adenovirus E1B 55-kDa protein binds to cellular tumor suppressor p53 and inactivates its transcriptional transactivation function. p53 transactivation activity is dependent upon its ability to bind to specific DNA sequences near the promoters of its target genes. It was shown recently that p53 is acetylated by transcriptional coactivators p300, CREB bidning protein (CBP), and PCAF and that acetylation of p53 by these proteins enhances p53 sequence-specific DNA binding. Here we show that the E1B 55-kDa protein specifically inhibits p53 acetylation by PCAF in vivo and in vitro, while acetylation of histones and PCAF autoacetylation is not affected. Furthermore, the DNA-binding activity of p53 is diminished in cells expressing the E1B 55-kDa protein. PCAF binds to the E1B 55-kDa protein and to a region near the C terminus of p53 encompassing Lys-320, the specific PCAF acetylation site. We further show that the E1B 55-kDa protein interferes with the physical interaction between PCAF and p53, suggesting that the E1B 55-kDa protein inhibits PCAF acetylase function on p53 by preventing enzyme-substrate interaction. These results underscore the importance of p53 acetylation for its function and suggest that inhibition of p53 acetylation by viral oncoproteins prevent its activation, thereby contributing to viral transformation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document