scholarly journals Hierarchical clustering optimizes the tradeoff between compositionality and expressivity of task structures in reinforcement learning

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rex G Liu ◽  
Michael J Frank

A hallmark of human intelligence is our ability to compositionally generalise: that is, to recompose familiar knowledge components in novel ways to solve new problems. For instance, a talented musician can conceivably transfer her knowledge of flute fingerings and guitar songs to play guitar music on a piccolo for the first time. Yet there are also instances where it can be helpful to learn and transfer not just individual task components, but entire structures or substructures, particularly whenever these recur in natural tasks (e.g., in bluegrass music one might transfer the joint structure of finger movements and musical scales from one stringed instrument to another). Prior theoretical work has explored how agents can learn and generalize task components or entire latent structures, but a satisfactory account for how a single agent can simultaneously satisfy the two competing demands is still lacking. Here, we propose a hierarchical model-based agent that learns and transfers individual task components as well as entire structures by inferring both through a non-parametric Bayesian model of the task. It maintains a factorised representation of task components through a hierarchical Dirichlet process, but it also represents different possible covariances between these components through a standard Dirichlet process. We validate our approach on a variety of navigation tasks covering a wide range of statistical correlations between task components and show that this hierarchical framework can also be applied to improve generalisation and transfer in hierarchical tasks with goal/subgoal structures.

Author(s):  
Tore Butlin ◽  
Jim Woodhouse

Predictive models of friction-induced vibration have proved elusive despite decades of research. There are many mechanisms that can cause brake squeal; friction coupled systems can be highly sensitive to small perturbations; and the dynamic properties of friction at the contact zone seem to be poorly understood. This paper describes experimental and theoretical work aimed at identifying the key ingredients of a predictive model. A large-scale experiment was carried out to identify squeal initiations using a pin-on-disc test rig: approximately 30,000 squeal initiations were recorded, covering a very wide range of frequencies. The theoretical model allows for completely general linear systems coupled at a single sliding point by friction: squeal is predicted using a linearised stability analysis. Results will be presented that show that almost all observed squeal events can be predicted within this model framework, but that some subsets require innovative friction modelling: predictions are highly dependent on the particular choice of friction model and its associated parameters.


2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 374-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seok Jin Kim ◽  
Dok Hyun Yoon ◽  
Jin Seok Kim ◽  
Hye Jin Kang ◽  
Hye Won Lee ◽  
...  

PurposeThe treatment outcome of brentuximab vedotin (BV) has not been related with CD30 expression in previous studies enrolling patients with a wide range of CD30 expression level. Thus, this study explored the efficacy of BV in high-CD30–expressing non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients most likely to benefit.Materials and MethodsThis phase II study (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02280785) enrolled relapsed or refractory high-CD30–expressing NHL, with BV administered intravenously at 1.8 mg/kg every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was > 40% disease control rate, consisting of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease. We defined high CD30 expression as ≥ 30% tumor cells positive for CD30 by immunohistochemistry.ResultsHigh-CD30-expressing NHL patients (n=33) were enrolled except anaplastic large cell lymphoma. The disease control rate was 48.5% (16/33) including six CR and six PR; six patients (4CR, 2PR) maintained their response over 16 completed cycles. Response to BV and survival were not associated with CD30 expression levels. Over a median of 29.2 months of follow-up, the median progression-free and overall survival rates were 1.9 months and 6.1 months, respectively. The most common adverse events were fever (39%), neutropenia (30%), fatigue (24%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (27%). In a <i>post-hoc</i> analysis for the association of multiple myeloma oncogene 1 (MUM1) on treatment outcome, MUM1- negative patients showed a higher response (55.6%, 5/9) than MUM1-positive patients (13.3%, 2/15).ConclusionBV performance as a single agent was acceptable in terms of disease control rates and toxicity profiles, especially MUM1-negative patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-67
Author(s):  
Mohammad Jay ◽  
David. A. MacDonald

Primary Central Nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is an uncommon type of central nervous system lymphoma, most commonly presenting as hemiparesis and headache. Currently, there is a wide range of treatments for PCNSL, consisting of various permutations between chemotherapy, radiation and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Although the backbone of PCNSL treatment consists of High-dose Methotrexate (HD-MTX), the role of combination versus single agent chemotherapy, combined modality (chemotherapy + radiation) versus chemotherapy or radiation alone, and the use of consolidative ASCT are contested. Surgery does not have a role in the treatment of PCNSL although stereotactic biopsies tend to help with symptomatic relief. Radiation monotherapy is generally reserved for patients with contraindications to chemotherapy or as a palliative measure. Combined chemotherapy and radiation treatment has been shown to have a great efficacy, although its increased neurotoxicity compared to chemotherapy alone is a major drawback. A growing body of research is focused on comparing the efficacy of various chemotherapeutic regimens. Currently, the MATRix regimen comprising of HD-MTX(3.5g/m2)-cytarabine/rituximab/thiotepa is widely used. The additional survival benefit of ASCT is contested although its role in the treatment of refractory or relapsed PCNSL is generally agreed upon. Finally, intrathecal HD-MTX has been shown to have added survival benefit when added to the standard therapies. Further retrospective and prospective studies are required to compare the efficacy and toxicity of various treatment options, with a focus on different chemotherapeutic agents and ASCT.


Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guerini ◽  
Triggiani ◽  
Maddalo ◽  
Bonù ◽  
Frassine ◽  
...  

Anticancer treatment efficacy is limited by the development of refractory tumor cells characterized by increased expression and activity of mechanisms promoting survival, proliferation, and metastatic spread. The present review summarizes the current literature regarding the use of the anthelmintic mebendazole (MBZ) as a repurposed drug in oncology with a focus on cells resistant to approved therapies, including so called “cancer stem cells”. Mebendazole meets many of the characteristics desirable for a repurposed drug: good and proven toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics allowing to reach therapeutic concentrations at disease site, ease of administration and low price. Several in vitro studies suggest that MBZ inhibits a wide range of factors involved in tumor progression such as tubulin polymerization, angiogenesis, pro-survival pathways, matrix metalloproteinases, and multi-drug resistance protein transporters. Mebendazole not only exhibits direct cytotoxic activity, but also synergizes with ionizing radiations and different chemotherapeutic agents and stimulates antitumoral immune response. In vivo, MBZ treatment as a single agent or in combination with chemotherapy led to the reduction or complete arrest of tumor growth, marked decrease of metastatic spread, and improvement of survival. Further investigations are warranted to confirm the clinical anti-neoplastic activity of MBZ and its safety in combination with other drugs in a clinical setting.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3678-3678
Author(s):  
Ajay K. Gopal ◽  
Stefano R Tarantolo ◽  
Naresh Bellam ◽  
Tatyana Feldman ◽  
Anthony R Mato ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3678 Background: CD37 is a tetraspanin protein expressed on the surface of normal and transformed B-cells across a wide range of maturational stages and demonstrates death signaling via SHP1. TRU-016 is a novel humanized anti-CD37 SMIP™ (mono-specific protein therapeutic) that has shown significantly greater direct killing of CLL cells than rituximab and greater Fc mediated cellular cytotoxicity of CLL cells than either alemtuzumab or rituximab in pre-clinical models. In preclinical in vitro and in vivo models of NHL significant activity of TRU-016 against multiple cell lines was observed. In a phase 1 study, TRU-016 showed activity in patients (pts) with CLL and NHL was observed. Given the single-agent clinical activity of TRU-016 and synergistic or additive effect of TRU-016 with multiple agents in preclinical models, this trial of TRU-016 with rituximab and bendamustine was conducted to establish the maximum tolerated dose, overall safety, and clinical activity of TRU-016 in pts with relapsed indolent NHL. Methods: Pts with relapsed or refractory indolent B-cell NHL with adequate organ function, ECOG ≤2, absolute neutrophil count ≥1000/μL, platelets'100,000/μL who were not refractory to bendamustine were eligible. After premedication with acetaminophen, diphenhydramine, and hydrocortisone pts received TRU-016 (10 or 20 mg/kg on Days 1 and 15) over 2–3 hrs combined with rituximab 375 mg/m2 (Day 2) and bendamustine 90 mg/m2 (Days 1 and 2) by IV infusion for up to six 28-day cycles. Safety was evaluated using CTCAE 4.03 and response was determined using the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2007) after every 2 cycles. Results: 12 pts, (9 with follicular lymphoma (FL) and 3 with small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL)) were treated (6 each dose level). Pt characteristics: median age 57 yrs (range, 51–79), median prior regimens 3 (1–4), 67% ≥ stage III at diagnosis, 4 pts had bulky disease > 5cm. All pts had relapsed after prior rituximab (R) including 3 refractory to their most recent previous treatment. In addition, prior treatments included: CHOP-R (8), RICE (5), single agent R (5), transplant (2). FLIPI scores at study entry (FL pts) were: 8 intermediate, 1 low. The most frequent (>2 pts) adverse events (AEs) were: neutropenia (8), fatigue, nausea, insomnia, and WBC decreased (7 each); anemia, diarrhea, headache, hypophosphatemia, thrombocytopenia, and vomiting (3 each). Grade 3/4 AEs that occurred in >1 pt were neutropenia (6), hypophosphatemia (3), WBC decreased (2). Serious AEs (SAE) included asymptomatic pulmonary thrombosis in 2 pts and febrile neutropenia, pneumonia, myelodysplastic syndrome (pt had prior transplant, CHOP, RICE), deep vein thrombosis, and retinal vein occlusion (last 2 events and pulmonary thrombosis occurred in same pt) in 1 pt each. There was no apparent dose relationship to the SAEs. The best overall response was 10/12 (83%) with 4 CRs (32%). Four responding pts (1 CR, 3 PR) discontinued treatment prior to cycle 6 due to undergoing consolidation with transplant (2), development of myelodysplastic syndrome (1), and delayed neutrophil recovery (1). The 4 discontinuations occurred in the 20 mg cohort and limit the response evaluation of the 20 mg dose. However, after Cycle 2 Day 15, the overall response rate was 67% at 10 mg/kg and 100% at 20 mg/kg. Three of the 4 pts with bulky disease responded to the regimen Conclusions: TRU-016 in combination with rituximab and bendamustine was well-tolerated, induces responses in the majority of patients with relapsed indolent B-NHL. A MTD was not defined. Future combination studies of TRU-016 in NHL are warranted. Disclosures: Mato: Celgene, Milennium, Genentech, Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau. Stromatt:Emergent Product Development: Employment.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4898-4898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Ann Huff ◽  
Quiju Wang ◽  
Ashraf Z. Badros ◽  
Richard J. Jones ◽  
Anita Reddy ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4898 Despite improved response rates with the use of novel agents, the vast majority of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) experience disease relapse and progression. This clinical pattern suggests the cells responsible for tumor regrowth persist following treatment, and we previously demonstrated that highly tumorigenic and self-renewing MM cells are relatively resistant to a wide range of anti-myeloma agents. These MM CSCs are present in the peripheral blood circulation and express memory B cell surface antigens (CD19 and CD27) and the stem cell marker aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH). We have also studied cellular mechanisms regulating self-renewal and found that MM CSCs express increased levels of telomerase activity (TA). In preclinical models, the novel telomerase inhibitor imetelstat has been found to inhibit CSCs from a wide range of tumor types, and we reported that imetelstat reduced TA in MM CSCs resulting in the loss of self-renewal and clonogenic growth potential. In an open label phase II clinical trial initiated in February 2011, previously treated MM patients (pts) (n=6) with stable but detectable disease following treatment with an iMid or proteasome inhibitor received single agent imetelstat (7.5–9.4 mg/kg IV on days 1 and 8 every 21–28 days). Additional pts (n=4) receiving lenalidomide maintenance and whose disease was stable for at least three months have also been enrolled. Pts received imetelstat therapy until evidence of disease progression or toxicity. Median age is 62.5 years (range 53–68); median number of prior therapies is 1 (range 1–4) including 4 pts with prior autologous transplant and 1 pt with prior mini-allogeneic transplant; 8 pts with prior bortezomib use; 9 pts with prior iMiD use; and 4 pts with concurrent lenalidomide use with receipt of lenalidomide for a median of 11.38 months (range 4.51–19.21 months) prior to initiation of imetelstat. As of July 30, 2012, 6 pts remain on study. Four pts were discontinued from imetelstat therapy after receiving a median of 7 doses of imetelstat either due to disease progression (n=2) or hematologic toxicity (n=2). Cytopenias were the most frequently reported toxicity with 8 of 10 pts demonstrating grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia during cycle 2, often requiring dose reductions or holds in subsequent cycles. The frequency of circulating MM CSCs (CD19+CD27+ALDH+) was quantified by flow cytometry. Circulating MM CSCs could be detected prior to the initiation of imetelstat (mean 10.7 × 10e3 cells/ml, range 17–53 × 10e3) in 8 of the 9 pts who have completed at least 2 cycles of treatment with imetelstat. In the single remaining patient, circulating CSCs were assessed from Cycle 2 onwards. Over the course of treatment, the frequency of MM CSCs decreased significantly, on average 2 fold every 30 days (Fig 1), in 8 of the 9 patients studied despite no upgrades in clinical response as per IWG criteria. In two pts who received 4 and 6 cycles of single agent imetelstat respectively, standard responses detected as decreasing or plateaued serum M protein or light chain levels were sustained over 4 months following discontinuation (Fig 2). Moreover, these delayed responses occurred in the absence of any additional therapy. These findings demonstrate that imetelstat rapidly decreases circulating MM CSCs. In addition, several patients experienced delayed, but sustained, clinical responses as measured by standard criteria. Therefore, imetelstat may have therapeutic implications for MM and other malignancies driven by CSCs. Figure 1. Serial measurement of CSCs in patients (n=9) treated with imetelstat Figure 1. Serial measurement of CSCs in patients (n=9) treated with imetelstat Figure 2. Clinical response in Pts 003 and 004 based on changes in paraprotein level. Dashed line represents off study evaluation. Figure 2. Clinical response in Pts 003 and 004 based on changes in paraprotein level. Dashed line represents off study evaluation. Disclosures: Huff: Celgene: Scientific Advisory Board Other; Novartis: Consultancy. Jones:Cytomedix: Royalties, Royalties Patents & Royalties. Reddy:Geron Corp.: Employment. Nishimoto:Geron Corp: Employment. Stuart:Geron Corp: Consultancy, Employment; OncoMed Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Kelsey:Geron Corp: Employment. Matsui:Geron Corp.: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4932-4932
Author(s):  
Lewis R. Silverman ◽  
Shyamala C. Navada ◽  
Rosalie Odchimar-Reissig ◽  
Maria Michalak ◽  
Erin P Demakos ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4932 Background: The hypomethylating agent azacitidine (azaC) which can reverse epigenetic silencing, is the first agent demonstrated to alter the natural history of MDS and improve survival in higher-risk patients (Silverman JCO 2002, Fenaux Lancet Oncology 2009). AzaC also produces comparable rates of response in patients with non-proliferative AML and appears to affect survival (Silverman JCO 2006). The response rate to single agent azaC is about 50% with median duration of response about 14 to 22 months. Patients who are refractory to or relapse following first line therapy with azaC have a median survival of 4 to 6 months (Jabbour 2010, Prebet 2011). Options for these patients failing first-line therapy with azaC are limited and there is no standard of care. Investigational therapies are being explored but not always widely available for these patients. Prior studies with azaC explored higher doses but were inconclusive to a dose response effect secondary to the slow time to response with a median of 2 to 3 cycles. In vitro, azaC has a wide range of concentrations that can induce differentiation up to 4 μm. In patients the standard clinical dose achieves a plasma level of 1. 25 μm thus suggesting that higher doses might have a clinical benefit (Marcucci 2005). Methods: Patients who were refractory to or relapsing following treatment with an azaC based regimen for MDS where alternative investigational options were not available and who were not rapidly progressing (i. e rapidly rising WBC or myeloblast %), were treated with higher doses of single agent azaC. The dose was increased by 33% from the baseline prior failing regimen (eg 55 to 75 or 75 to 100 mg/m2). The azaC was administered SC × 7 days q 28 days; response status was assessed after 2 cycles. Patients stable or responding were continued on 28 day cycles. Myeloid cytokine support was utilized for patients with ANC < 200 and ESA support for patients who were RBC dependent. Results: As of the data cut for this submission 13 patients are evaluable for toxicity and response. Among the 13 patients the median age was 68 and 11 were male. All had been treated with azaC based regimens before and 10 had responded: 4 CR; 1 PR; 5 HI; 2 NR; 1 unknown. The immediate therapy prior to increased dosing included: azaC + histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) (6); single agent azaC (5); investigational treatment (2). 6 had MDS (int-1 (2); int-2 (3); high (1) and 7 AML (all transformed following MDS all smoldering). Responses among evaluable patients have occurred in 11 of 13 (85%); 1 PR, 7 HI (4 CRm), 1 CRm, (CR+CRi=53%) 2 PRm, 1 SD, 1 NR. Although responses occurred, the abnormal MDS/AML clone persisted, suggesting that the higher dose did not have a cytotoxic effect on the malignant clone. A total of 117 cycles have been administered, range 2 to 17 with a mean 8 cycles. Median time to treatment failure was 11. 6 months and median survival is 17. 5 months. Eight patients have come off treatment for progression (5); relapse (2); co-morbidities (1). No grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicities were observed. Hematologic toxicity was similar to that seen with standard dose azaC. Conclusion: Modification of the dose of azaC in select patients, who lack alternative options including investigational agents or stem cell transplant, may improve blood counts and reduce the bone marrow blasts. The quality of the response to the increased dose after primary failure does not attain the level of the original response in most, however, this approach may increase therapeutic options in a poor risk population. Investigations into the potential mechanisms of action are being explored. Disclosures: Silverman: celgene: Speakers Bureau. Demakos:celgene: Speakers Bureau.


Author(s):  
Kazuteru Miyazaki ◽  
◽  
Keiki Takadama ◽  

Recently, the tailor-made system that grants an individual request has been recognized as the important approach. Such a system requires the ggoal-directed learningh through interaction between user and system, which is mainly addressed in greinforcement learningh domain. This special issue on gNew Trends in Reinforcement Learningh called for papers on the cuttingedge research exploring the goal-directed learning, which represents reinforcement learning. Many contributions were forthcoming, but we finally selected 12 works for publication. Although greinforcement learningh is included in the title of this special issue, the research works do not necessarily have to be on reinforcement learning itself, so long as the theme coincides with that of this special issue. In making our final selections, we gave special consideration to the kinds of research which can actively lead to new trends in reinforcement learning. Of the 12 papers in this special issue, the first four mainly deal with the expansion of the reinforcement learning method in single agent environments. These cover a broad range of research, from works based on dynamic programming to exploitation-oriented methods. The next two works deal with the Learning Classifier System (LCS), which applies the rule discovery mechanism to reinforcement learning. LCS is a technique with a long history, but for this issue, we were able to publish two theoretical works. We are also grateful to Prof. Toshio Fukuda, Nagoya University, and Prof. Kaoru Hirota, Tokyo Institute of Technology, the editors-in-chief, and the NASTEC 2008 conference staff for inviting us to guest-edit this Journal. The next four papers mainly deal with multi agent environments. We were able to draw from a wide range of research: from measuring interaction, through the expansion of techniques incorporating simultaneous learning, to research leading to application in multi agent environments. The last two contributions mainly deal with application. We publish one paper on exemplar generalization and another detailing the successful application to government bond trading. Each of these researches can be considered to be at the cutting-edge of reinforcement learning. We would like to end by saying that we hope this special issue constitutes a large contribution to the development of the field while holding a wide international appeal.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14006-14006 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. I. Sikic ◽  
H. A. Wakelee ◽  
M. von Mehren ◽  
N. Lewis ◽  
A. H. Calvert ◽  
...  

14006 Background: Lexatumumab (HGS-ETR2) is a fully-human agonistic monoclonal antibody that targets and activates the Tumor Necrosis Factor-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand Receptor 2 (TRAIL-R2). TRAIL-R2 is a member of the Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor (TNFR) superfamily that, when activated, induces apoptosis via the extrinsic pathway. Lexatumumab shows promising anti-tumor activity in preclinical models, particularly in combination with chemotherapeutic agents. Single-agent lexatumumab was well-tolerated in phase I trials. This is the first study of the safety of a TRAIL-R2 agonist in combination with chemotherapy. Methods: Patients for whom gemcitabine, pemetrexed, doxorubicin or FOLFIRI was considered an appropriate treatment received one of the full-dose chemotherapy regimens plus lexatumumab every 2 weeks (for gemcitabine and FOLFIRI) or 3 weeks (for pemetrexed and doxorubicin). Four to 6 patients were treated with 5 mg/kg lexatumumab in each chemotherapy cohort prior to dose escalation to 10 mg/kg. Results: To date, 41 patients with a wide range of cancer types have received 164 courses of lexatumumab over the 2 dose levels. The majority (33/41) received at least 2 courses (range 1 to 19). Lexatumumab was well-tolerated; no dose reductions of lexatumumab were required. Severe adverse events considered at least possibly related to lexatumumab included anemia, fatigue and dehydration. Tumor shrinkage has been observed, including confirmed partial responses (PRs) in the FOLFIRI and doxorubicin arms. Eight patients continue on study. Conclusions: Lexatumumab can be safely administered in combination with a wide range of chemotherapeutic agents. Evaluation of the efficacy of lexatumumab in combination with chemotherapy in Phase 2 trials is warranted. [Table: see text]


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3017-3017
Author(s):  
L. Andritsos ◽  
R. Furman ◽  
I. W. Flinn ◽  
A. Foreno-Torres ◽  
J. M. Flynn ◽  
...  

3017 Background: CD37 is a tetraspan family member expressed predominantly on normal and transformed B-cells across a wide range of maturational stages. TRU-016 is a novel humanized anti-CD37 SMIP. Pre-clinical studies have demonstrated CD37 SMIP mediates significantly greater direct and NK-cell mediated killing of CLL cells as compared to other therapeutic antibodies used in CLL. A phase I study with TRU-016 was initiated based upon these data. Methods: Patients with relapsed/refractory CLL or SLL who had adequate organ function, platelets > 30,000/mm3 were eligible. Six doses and two different schedules (cohorts 1–8) have/or will be studied. The planned doses range from 0.03 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg IV once a week for 4 doses (cohort 1–6). The second schedule (cohort 7–8) will test 3.0 or 10.0 mg/kg on days 1, 3, and 5 the first week followed by 3 weekly doses. Dose escalation and de-escalation is based on CTC AE toxicity grades. Results: To date, 10 patients have been enrolled (cohort 1–5) and completed treatment; 1 patient (cohort 1–3: 0.03, 0.1, and 0.3 mg/kg); 3 patients at 1.0 mg/kg, and 4 patients at 3.0 mg/kg. Eight of the 10 have high risk genomic features [del(17p13.1), n=5 and del(11q22.3), n=3]. No dose limiting toxicities or serious adverse events have occurred. Mild (grade 1–2) infusion toxicity has been observed in 3 patients. Beginning with the 0.3 mg/kg dose, all eight patients demonstrated evidence of biological activity including patients with del(17p13.1). Two patients had partial clearing of leukemia cutis, and the other six had 27–94% reduction in peripheral lymphocyte count. One pt. had an increase in Hgb of 40% and a reduction in lymph nodes of 36%. Two patients had a significant increase in platelet count. Enrollment to cohort 6 is complete and further up-to-date data will be presented. Conclusions: To date, TRU-016 is a well tolerated treatment with minimal infusional toxicity and no observed dose limiting toxicity. Encouraging reduction in tumor lymphocyte blood counts, lymph node/spleen size and improvement in normal hematopoeitic function in patients with high risk genomic CLL have already been observed at low, non-saturating doses of CD37. Future single agent and combination studies of Tru16 in CLL are warranted. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document