Mammographic screening attendance among immigrant and minority women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background Groups of immigrant and minority women are more often diagnosed with advanced stage breast cancer than other women. Mammographic screening aims to reduce mortality from breast cancer through early detection in asymptomatic women. Purpose To compare mammographic screening attendance among immigrant and minority women to that of other women. Material and Methods A literature search of PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane identified 1369 papers published between January 1995 and March 2016. In the review, we included 33 studies investigating mammographic screening attendance among immigrant and/or minority women. In a meta-analysis, we included 19 of the studies that compared attendance among immigrant and/or minority women with that among other women, using a random effects model. Results The review included studies from Europe, North America, and Oceania, with 42,666,093 observations of opportunities for mammographic screening. Attendance was generally lower among immigrant and minority women compared to other women (46.2% vs. 55.0%; odds ratio = 0.64, 95% confidence interval = 0.56–0.73; P < 0.05, I2 = 99.9%). Non-Western immigrants had lower attendance rates than other immigrants. Conclusion Immigrant and minority women had lower mammographic screening attendance than other women, which could potentially put them at increased risk for more advanced breast cancer. This review emphasizes the importance of continued efforts to engage with the preventative health needs of diverse populations in attempts to achieve equality in access to, and use of, care.

Download Full-text

Transiently increased risk of breast cancer after childbirth: implications for fertility treatments and surrogacy

Human Reproduction ◽

10.1093/humrep/deaa102 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 35 (6) ◽

pp. 1253-1255

Author(s):

Zeev Blumenfeld ◽

Norbert Gleicher ◽

Eli Y Adashi

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Breast Cancer Risk ◽

Cancer Risk ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Small Degree ◽

Short Term ◽

Benefit Ratio ◽

Professional Societies ◽

Fertility Treatments ◽

Increased Risk

Abstract Whereas longstanding dogma has purported that pregnancies protect women from breast cancer, a recent meta-analysis now mandates reconsideration since it reported an actual higher breast cancer risk for more than two decades after childbirth before the relative risk turns negative. Moreover, the risk of breast cancer appears higher for women having their first birth at an older age and with a family history and it is not reduced by breastfeeding. The process of obtaining informed consent for all fertility treatments, therefore, must make patients aware of the facts that every pregnancy, to a small degree, will increase the short-term breast cancer risk. This observation may be even more relevant in cases of surrogacy where women agree to conceive without deriving benefits of offspring from assuming the risk, thus creating a substantially different risk-benefit ratio. Consequently, it appears prudent for professional societies in the field to update recommendations regarding consent information for all fertility treatments but especially for treatments involving surrogacy.

Download Full-text

The association between XRCC3 rs1799794 polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 34 case–control studies

BMC Medical Genomics ◽

10.1186/s12920-021-00965-4 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 14 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Weiqing Liu ◽

Shumin Ma ◽

Lei Liang ◽

Zhiyong Kou ◽

Hongbin Zhang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Ovarian Cancer ◽

Thyroid Cancer ◽

Cancer Risk ◽

Large Scale ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Cancer Type ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Risk Of Cancer

Abstract Background Studies on the XRCC3 rs1799794 polymorphism show that this polymorphism is involved in a variety of cancers, but its specific relationships or effects are not consistent. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate the association between rs1799794 polymorphism and susceptibility to cancer. Methods PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for eligible studies through June 11, 2019. All analyses were performed with Stata 14.0. Subgroup analyses were performed by cancer type, ethnicity, source of control, and detection method. A total of 37 studies with 23,537 cases and 30,649 controls were included in this meta-analysis. Results XRCC3 rs1799794 increased cancer risk in the dominant model and heterozygous model (GG + AG vs. AA: odds ratio [OR] = 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00–1.08, P = 0.051; AG vs. AA: OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.00–1.01, P = 0.015). The existence of rs1799794 increased the risk of breast cancer and thyroid cancer, but reduced the risk of ovarian cancer. In addition, rs1799794 increased the risk of cancer in the Caucasian population. Conclusion This meta-analysis confirms that XRCC3 rs1799794 is related to cancer risk, especially increased risk for breast cancer and thyroid cancer and reduced risk for ovarian cancer. However, well-designed large-scale studies are required to further evaluate the results.

Download Full-text

Lower attendance rates in immigrant versus non-immigrant women in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Programme

Journal of Medical Screening ◽

10.1177/0969141317733771 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 25 (3) ◽

pp. 155-161 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

Sameer Bhargava ◽

Kaitlyn Tsuruda ◽

Kåre Moen ◽

Ida Bukholm ◽

Solveig Hofvind

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Cancer Screening ◽

Breast Cancer Screening ◽

Screening Programme ◽

Immigrant Women ◽

Population Based ◽

Mammographic Screening ◽

Attendance Rates ◽

Breast Cancer Screening Programme ◽

Cancer Screening Programme

Objective The Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Programme invites women aged 50–69 to biennial mammographic screening. Although 84% of invited women have attended at least once, attendance rates vary across the country. We investigated attendance rates among various immigrant groups compared with non-immigrants in the programme. Methods There were 4,053,691 invitations sent to 885,979 women between 1996 and 2015. Using individual level population-based data from the Cancer Registry and Statistics Norway, we examined percent attendance and calculated incidence rate ratios, comparing immigrants with non-immigrants, using Poisson regression, following women's first invitation to the programme and for ever having attended. Results Immigrant women had lower attendance rates than the rest of the population, both following the first invitation (53.1% versus 76.1%) and for ever having attended (66.9% versus 86.4%). Differences in attendance rates between non-immigrant and immigrant women were less pronounced, but still present, when adjusted for sociodemographic factors. We also identified differences in attendance between immigrant groups. Attendance increased with duration of residency in Norway. A subgroup analysis of migrants' daughters showed that 70.0% attended following the first invitation, while 82.3% had ever attended. Conclusions Immigrant women had lower breast cancer screening attendance rates. The rationale for immigrant women's non-attendance needs to be explored through further studies targeting women from various birth countries and regions.

Download Full-text

Oral Contraceptive Use and Breast Cancer Risk Assessment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Case-Control Studies, 2009–2020

Cancers ◽

10.3390/cancers13225654 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (22) ◽

pp. 5654

Author(s):

Agnieszka Barańska ◽

Agata Błaszczuk ◽

Wiesław Kanadys ◽

Maria Malm ◽

Katarzyna Drop ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Oral Contraceptive ◽

Cancer Risk ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Case Control ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Control Group ◽

Case Control Studies ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Breast Cancer Risk Assessment

To perform a meta-analysis of case-control studies that addressed the association between oral contraceptive pills (OC) use and breast cancer (BrCa), PubMED (MEDLINE), Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify case-control studies of OC and BrCa published between 2009 and 2020. We used the DerSimonian–Laird method to compute pooled odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs), and the Mantel–Haenszel test to assess the association between OC use and cancer. Forty-two studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria and we included a total of 110,580 women (30,778 into the BrCa group and 79,802 into the control group, of which 15,722 and 38,334 were using OC, respectively). The conducted meta-analysis showed that the use of OC was associated with a significantly increased risk of BrCa in general, OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.31, p = 0.0358. Regarding other risk factors for BrCa, we found that increased risk was associated significantly with early menarche, nulliparous, non-breastfeeding, older age at first parity, postmenopause, obesity, smoking, and family history of BrCa. Despite our conclusion that birth control pills increase the cancer risk being supported by extensive previous studies and meta-analyzes, further confirmation is required.

Download Full-text

What do women know about breast density? A public screening program perspective

10.1101/2020.04.02.20048371 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Monique Robertson ◽

Ellie C Darcey ◽

Evenda K Dench ◽

Louise Keogh ◽

Kirsty McLean ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Breast Density ◽

Screening Program ◽

Mammographic Screening ◽

Descriptive Data ◽

Additional Information ◽

Dense Breasts ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Main Message ◽

First Time

AbstractBackgroundThis study assesses knowledge of breast density, one of breast cancer’s strongest risk factors, in women attending a public mammographic screening program in Western Australia that routinely notifies women if they have dense breasts.MethodsSurvey data was collected from women who were notified they have dense breasts and women who had not (controls). Descriptive data analysis was used to summarize responses.ResultsOf the 6183 women surveyed, over 85% of notified women knew that breast density makes it difficult to see cancer on a mammogram (53.9% in controls). A quarter of notified women knew that having dense breasts puts women at increased risk for breast cancer (13.2% in controls). Overall, 50.1% of notified women indicated that they thought the amount of information provided was “just right” and 24.9% thought it was “too little”, particularly women notified for the first time (32.1%).ConclusionThe main message of reduced sensitivity of mammography in women with dense breasts provided by the screening program appears to be getting though. However, women are largely unaware that increased breast density is associated with increased risk. Women notified of having dense breasts for the first time could potentially benefit from additional information.

Download Full-text

Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors (PARPi) for Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer: a Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

10.21203/rs.3.rs-48500/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

YongCheng Su ◽

XiaoGang Zheng

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Randomized Controlled Trials ◽

Fixed Effects ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Parp Inhibitors ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Grade 3

Abstract BACKGROUND: Poly(ADP–ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are new class of drugs that are currently being studied in several malignancies. However, datas about the efficacy and safety of the PARP inhibitors are limited. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) in patients with breast cancer.METHODS: Pubmed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) were searched for articles published from 2000 to June 2018.Summary incidences and the RR, HR with 95% confidence intervals, were calculated by using a random-effects or fixed-effects model.RESULTS: The summary HR indicated PARPi was not associated with OS (HR=0.83, 95%CI 0.66–1.06, Z=1.49, P=0.14), while it could significantly improve PFS ande time to deterioration (TTD) of global health status/quality of life(GHS/QoL) as compared with traditional standard therapy, the HR was 0.60(95%CI 0.50-0.72; Z=5.52, P＜0.00001) and 0.4 (95%CI 0.29–0.54,z=5.80 ,p=0.000),respectively.The RR of grade 3 or more anemia ,fatigue and headache was 3.02 (95% CI, 0.69–13.17;p = 0.14,,I2=90%),0.77 (95%CI, 0.34–1.73;p=0.52,I2=7%) and 1.13 (95% CI,0.30–4.18;p=0.86,I2=0%),respectively.CONCLUSION: The findings of this meta-analysis showed that PARPi has no significant effect on OS, while it could significantly improve in PFS and TTD of GHS/QoL for patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer.Furthermore,our findings also demonstrated that the PARPi treatment is connected with an increased risk of grade 3 or more anemia adverse events.

Download Full-text

Can a subgroup at high risk for LRR be identified from T1-2 breast cancer with negative lymph nodes after mastectomy? A meta-analysis

Bioscience Reports ◽

10.1042/bsr20181853 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 39 (9) ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Gongling Peng ◽

Zhuohui Zhou ◽

Ming Jiang ◽

Fan Yang

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

High Risk ◽

Lymph Nodes ◽

Patient Population ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Histologic Grade ◽

Surgical Margins ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Negative Lymph Nodes

Abstract Purpose: To identify a subgroup at high risk for loco-regional recurrence (LRR) from T1-2 breast cancer with negative lymph nodes (N0) after mastectomy by using a meta-analysis. Methods and materials: Published studies on the relationship between clinical features and LRR of breast cancer were identified from public databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. High-risk features for LRR in this patient population were defined based on the pooled results of meta-analysis. Results: For the meta-analysis, a total of 11244 breast cancers with pT1-2N0 after mastectomy from 20 publications were included for analysis. The pooled results indicated that age (hazard ratio (HR) 1.77, P=0.001), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (HR 2.23, P<0.001), histologic grade (HR 1.66, P<0.001), HER2 status (HR 1.65, P=0.027), menopausal status (HR 1.36, P=0.015), and surgical margins (HR 2.56, P=0.014) were associated with a significantly increased risk of developing LRR in this patient population group, but not for tumor size (HR 1.32, P=0.23), systematic therapy (HR 1.67, P=0.20), and hormonal receptor status (HR 1.04, P=0.73). Conclusion: In the current study, patients with young age, positive LVI, high histologic grade, HER-2 positive, premenopausal, and positive surgical margins have an increased risk of developing LRR. Further prospective trials are needed to clearly define the role of adjuvant postmastectomy radiotherapy in T1-2N0 breast cancer at high risk of developing LRR.

Download Full-text

Meta-Analysis

Methods of Information in Medicine ◽

10.1055/s-0038-1633931 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 44 (01) ◽

pp. 127-135 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

D. Böhning

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Hormone Replacement Therapy ◽

Replacement Therapy ◽

Mixed Model ◽

Unobserved Heterogeneity ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Hormone Replacement ◽

Large Trial ◽

Increased Risk ◽

The One

Summary Objectives: This contribution provides a unifying concept for meta-analysis integrating the handling of unobserved heterogeneity, study covariates, publication bias and study quality. It is important to consider these issues simultaneously to avoid the occurrence of artifacts, and a method for doing so is suggested here. Methods: The approach is based upon the meta-likelihood in combination with a general linear nonparametric mixed model, which lays the ground for all inferential conclusions suggested here. Results: The concept is illustrated at hand of a meta-analysis investigating the relationship of hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer. The phenomenon of interest has been investigated in many studies for a considerable time and different results were reported. In 1992 a meta-analysis by Sillero-Arenas et al. [1] concluded a small, but significant overall effect of 1.06 on the relative risk scale. Using the meta-likelihood approach it is demonstrated here that this meta-analysis is due to considerable unobserved heterogeneity. Furthermore, it is shown that new methods are available to model this heterogeneity successfully. It is argued further to include available study covariates to explain this heterogeneity in the meta-analysis at hand. Conclusions: The topic of HRT and breast cancer has again very recently become an issue of public debate, when results of a large trial investigating the health effects of hormone replacement therapy were published indicating an increased risk for breast cancer (risk ratio of 1.26). Using an adequate regression model in the previously published meta-analysis an adjusted estimate of effect of 1.14 can be given which is considerably higher than the one published in the meta-analysis of Sillero-Arenas et al. [1]. In summary, it is hoped that the method suggested here contributes further to a good meta-analytic practice in public health and clinical disciplines.

Download Full-text

Cancer Incidence in Patients With Acromegaly: A Cohort Study and Meta-Analysis of the Literature

The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism ◽

10.1210/jc.2017-02457 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 103 (6) ◽

pp. 2182-2188 ◽

Cited By ~ 38

Author(s):

Jakob Dal ◽

Michelle Z Leisner ◽

Kasper Hermansen ◽

Dóra Körmendiné Farkas ◽

Mads Bengtsen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Cohort Study ◽

Cancer Incidence ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Population Based ◽

Incidence Rates ◽

Tract Cancer ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Risk Of Cancer

Abstract Context Acromegaly has been associated with increased risk of cancer morbidity and mortality, but research findings remain conflicting and population-based data are scarce. We therefore examined whether patients with acromegaly are at higher risk of cancer. Design A nationwide cohort study (1978 to 2010) including 529 acromegaly cases was performed. Incident cancer diagnoses and mortality were compared with national rates estimating standardized incidence ratios (SIRs). A meta-analysis of cancer SIRs from 23 studies (including the present one) was performed. Results The cohort study identified 81 cases of cancer after exclusion of cases diagnosed within the first year [SIR 1.1; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.9 to 1.4]. SIRs were 1.4 (95% CI, 0.7 to 2.6) for colorectal cancer, 1.1 (95% CI, 0.5 to 2.1) for breast cancer, and 1.4 (95% CI, 0.6 to 2.6) for prostate cancer. Whereas overall mortality was elevated in acromegaly (SIR 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.6), cancer-specific mortality was not. The meta-analysis yielded an SIR of overall cancer of 1.5 (95% CI, 1.2 to 1.8). SIRs were elevated for colorectal cancer, 2.6 (95% CI, 1.7 to 4.0); thyroid cancer, 9.2 (95% CI, 4.2 to 19.9); breast cancer, 1.6 (1.1 to 2.3); gastric cancer, 2.0 (95% CI, 1.4 to 2.9); and urinary tract cancer, 1.5 (95% CI, 1.0 to 2.3). In general, cancer SIR was higher in single-center studies and in studies with <10 cancer cases. Conclusions Cancer incidence rates were slightly elevated in patients with acromegaly in our study, and this finding was supported by the meta-analysis of 23 studies, although it also suggested the presence of selection bias in some earlier studies.

Download Full-text

Partial breast irradiation or whole breast radiotherapy for early breast cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2009.27.18_suppl.cra532 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 27 (18_suppl) ◽

pp. CRA532-CRA532 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

A. Valachis ◽

D. Mauri ◽

N. P. Polyzos ◽

D. Mavroudis ◽

V. Georgoulias ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Radiation Therapy ◽

Randomized Clinical Trials ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Partial Breast Irradiation ◽

Breast Irradiation ◽

Breast Radiotherapy ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Whole Breast Radiotherapy ◽

Significant Difference

CRA532 Background: The purpose of the study was to compare treatment outcomes in patients with breast cancer treated with partial breast irradiation and of those treated with whole breast radiation therapy. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published. Randomized clinical trials comparing partial breast irradiation versus whole breast radiation therapy. Primary outcome was overall survival and secondary outcomes were locoregional, distant and supraclavicular recurrences. Results: A search of the literature identified 3 trials with pooled total of 1,140 patients. We found no statistically significant difference between partial and whole breast radiation arms associated with death (OR 0.912, 95% CI 0.674–1.234, p = 0.550), distant metastasis (OR 0.740, 95% CI, 0.506–1.082, p = 0.120), or supraclavicular recurrences (pooled OR 1.415, 95% CI 0.278–7.202, p = 0.560). However, partial breast irradiation was statistically significantly associated with an increased risk of both local (pooled OR 2.150, 95% CI, 1.396–3.312; p = 0.001) and regional disease recurrences (pooled OR 3.430, 95% CI, 2.058–5.715; p < 0.0001) compared with whole breast radiation. Conclusions: Partial breast irradiation does not jeopardize survival and may be used as an alternative to whole breast radiation. Nevertheless, the issue of locoregional recurrence needs to be further addressed. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text