scholarly journals Retrospective Review of Appropriate Use of Antimicrobials and Anticoagulants in Patients Hospitalized for a Malignant Hematologic Condition

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2116-2116
Author(s):  
Louis-Bassett Porter ◽  
Hanaa Shihadeh ◽  
Kim Dittus
Keyword(s):  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Maintenance Chemotherapy ◽  
Appropriate Use ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Platelet Counts ◽  
Anticoagulant Prophylaxis

Background Interventions for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis and primary antimicrobial prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients have resulted in reduced rates of VTE and infection. Appropriate prevention of thrombosis and infection requires a day-to-day evaluation in hospitalized hematology patients experiencing changing chemotherapy regimens and fluctuating neutrophil or platelet counts. Inappropriate use of anticoagulants in patients with thrombocytopenia may result in iatrogenic bleeding. Methods To evaluate appropriate antimicrobial and anticoagulant prophylaxis, a retrospective extraction of electronic medical records of hematology inpatients meeting eligibility criteria from 06/2017 - 06/2018 was completed. Appropriate use was determined by the University of Vermont Medical Center's internal protocols, which are derived from the current standard of care. Anti-viral prophylaxis (AVP) is required for any hospital day for patients undergoing HSCT and was within 180 days of transplant, or having a diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), while on induction, consolidation, or maintenance chemotherapy, or was receiving specific therapy (e.g., Hyper-CVAD, CODOX-M, R-DA-EPOCH, VD-PACE, bendamustine, alemtuzumab (stopping when CD4 count >200), proteosome inhibitors, or Daratumumab). Anti-pneumocystis prophylaxis (APP) is required for any hospital day for patients diagnosed with ALL (on induction, consolidation, or maintenance chemotherapy, or therapies listed above), receiving high dose steroids (prednisone >20 mg/day or dexamethasone >4 mg/day for 30 or more days), purine analogs (e.g., fludarabine, clofarabine) or undergoing HSCT (after platelet engraftment). Antimicrobial prophylaxis was considered inappropriate when the above conditions were met but the patient was not provided the appropriate therapy during an inpatient day and did not have a documented contraindication. Anticoagulant prophylaxis (ACP) was considered inappropriate when an anticoagulant was provided on a hospital day when platelets were less than 50 K/cmm. Days where the patient missed a dose at admission or discharge were excluded. Results We evaluated a total of 221 patient visit records comprised of 142 unique patients. In total, on 189 (10.9%) of 1,734 total inpatient days evaluated, appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis was not provided (Table 1). Regarding AVP, 15 (6.8%) patients missed at least one day, a total of 69 (4.0%) days. 11 (5.0%) patients missed at least one day of APP, a total of 120 (6.9%) days. Regarding ACP, there are 1,961 platelet count observations which included 219 visits from 140 unique patients (Table 2). Of these observations, 603 (30.8%) had platelet counts below 50 K/cmm. ACP was not held 18 times (3.0%) when platelet levels fell below 50 K/cmm. 51 patients (36.4%) had their platelets drop below 50 K/cmm at some point during their visit(s) of which 7 (13.7%) did not have ACP withheld. Conclusions and Discussion The results identify areas of improvement regarding antimicrobial prophylaxis. Antimicrobial prophylaxis is often not systematically evaluated on inpatient services and as such may not be consistently evaluated by clinicians rotating on the hematology service. Conversely, guidelines for withholding anticoagulant prophylaxis were more closely followed. This is likely due to the focus in recent years on anticoagulation prophylaxis and the near universal knowledge of bleeding risk when provided at low platelet levels. Inappropriate antithrombotic prophylaxis was most frequently noted at platelets of just below 50 K/cmm (i.e., 47-49 K/cmm) and immediately discontinued for following doses as platelet values declined. A potential intervention is the use of a daily checklist that can evaluate the use of these therapies. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals 1098. Norovirus Infection in Cancer Patients Undergoing Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Immunotherapy (CAR-T)

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S578-S579
Author(s):  
Divya S Kondapi ◽  
Sasirekha Ramani ◽  
Adilene Olvera ◽  
Robert L Atmar ◽  
Mary K Estes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Nucleic Acid Amplification ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T

Abstract Background CAR-T is used to treat certain refractory hematological malignancies. B-cell aplasia and immunosuppression used to treat CAR-T side effects increase infection risk. Little data are available describing Norovirus (NoV) infections in CAR-T recipients. Methods We reviewed the medical records of 134 patients with NoV diarrhea (identified by nucleic acid amplification test) between 2016-2019. Of these patients, nine received CAR-T prior to developing NoV. Here we describe their demographics, clinical characteristics, treatments, and complications. Results The median age was 49 years (Table 1). Patients’ underlying malignancies included Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (4), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (3), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (1) and metastatic Sarcoma (1). Prior to development of NoV, six patients had undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplant, and 1 had received checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Five patients experienced cytokine release syndrome after CAR-T, and 1 experienced CAR-T-related encephalopathy syndrome (Table 2). Two patients received interleukin-6 antagonist therapy, and one received high dose steroids. Time to diarrhea onset post-CAR-T cell infusion was variable(median 256days, IQR 26-523 days).Six had an absolute lymphocyte count< 1000/mm3 at diarrhea onset. Three had diarrhea for >14 days; median diarrhea duration in the other 6 patients was 4 days. Other GI complaints included abdominal pain (3), nausea (4), and vomiting (3). For NoV treatment, three received oral immunoglobulin, and 8 received Nitazoxanide. Complications included development of concomitant GI-GVHD(5), ileus (2), need for TPN (3), renal failure requiring dialysis (2), ICU stay (3), and death (2). Two patients were co-infected with other enteropathogens such as rotavirus, enteropathogenic and enteroaggregative E.Coli and Clostridioides difficile. Three patients with diarrhea lasting >14 days had serial samples collected over time; NoV shedding lasted 81-546 days. NoV was genotyped in 6 patients(Table 3) and included GII.2(2), GII.4(2), GII.6(1) and GII.12(1). Table 1: Patient characteristics (N=9) Table 2: CAR-T related factors Table 3: NoV Genotypes Conclusion NoV belonging to various genotypes is an important cause of acute and chronic diarrhea in patients receiving CAR-T cell therapy. Disclosures Adilene Olvera, MPH MLS (ASCP), MERK (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator) Robert L. Atmar, MD, Takeda Vaccines, Inc. (Grant/Research Support) Mary K. Estes, PhD, Takeda Vaccines (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)

Rituximab and High-Dose Dexamethasone (R-dex) Is Effective In The Treatment Of Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4184-4184
Author(s):  
Martin Simkovic ◽  
David Belada ◽  
Monika Motyckova ◽  
Lukas Smolej ◽  
Pavel Zak
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Published Data ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Dexamethasone ◽  
Tertiary Center

Abstract Introduction High-dose methylprednisolone (HDMP) in combination with rituximab is active in the treatment of relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) but serious infections are frequent. Recently published data suggest that high-dose dexamethasone might be equally effective to HDMP despite lower cumulative dose. Aims To assess efficacy and safety of high-dose dexamethasone combined with rituximab (R-dex) in relapsed/refractory CLL. Patients and Methods A total of 60 pts (pts) with relapsed/refractory CLL treated at a single tertiary center between September 2008 and October 2012 were included in this retrospective analysis. Basic characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The schedule of R-dex consisted of rituximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. day 1 (375 mg/m2 in cycle 1) and dexamethasone 40 mg orally on days 1-4 and 10-13. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of 8 cycles. All pts received antimicrobial prophylaxis with sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim and aciclovir. Results Median number of administered R-dex cycles was 6 (range, 1-8). The overall response (ORR)/complete remissions (CR) were achieved in 75/3%. At the median follow-up of 9 months, median progression-free survival was 8 months and median overall survival 24 months. Significant predictors of short PFS in univariate analysis were bulky lymphadenopathy (p=0.023) and refractoriness to fludarabine (p=0.02). Interestingly, activity of R-dex in bulky fludarabine-refractory CLL was similar to ofatumumab (ORR 62 %, median PFS, 4 months, median OS, 12 months) (Wierda et al., 2010). R-dex was successfully used as a debulking regimen before allogeneic stem cell transplantation in 8 patients. Serious (CTCAE grade III/IV) infections occurred in 29% of patients; 19% pts developed steroid diabetes requiring temporary short-acting insulin. Conclusions Our data show that R-Dex is an active and feasible treatment for patients with relapsed/refractory CLL; however, major infections remain relatively frequent despite combined antimicrobial prophylaxis. In addition, durable responses are infrequent. Therefore, further optimization of this therapeutic approach is warranted. Updated results will be presented. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Prognostic Factors and Outcomes in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Vs. Non-Transplant Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Patients: A Comparative Analysis with the Leukemia/BMT Program of British Columbia (BC) and the BC Provincial CLL Database

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2549-2549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian J. Swic ◽  
Alexander G. T. MacPhail ◽  
Chinmay B. Dalal ◽  
Steven J.T. Huang ◽  
Alina S. Gerrie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Early Recognition ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Long Term Outcome

Abstract Background: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) patients (pts) have significant (sig) heterogeneity; survival ranges from decades to <5 years (yrs). Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is promising treatment (tx) for high-risk pts. Ideally, predictive (pred) tools would allow clinicians to recognize such pts early, permitting transplant performance to maximize benefit and minimize procedure associated risk. Factors with significant (sig) pred capacity are not, however, entirely clarified. Moreover, limited studies compare CLL pts who have/have not received HSCT in terms of differences (diff) in characteristics (char) at diagnosis (dx), population (pop) composition and outcomes. This study evaluates pred factors for outcomes post allo-HSCT, and compares dx char between (bn) tx CLL pts who did /did not receive HSCT by evaluating a large pop-based CLL cohort (n= 1044) from the BC Provincial CLL Database (BCPCD). Methods: 102 CLL pts (71M, 31F) had consecutive allo-HSCT (01-91 to 03-13, L/BMT Program of BC). Median (med) age (range) at dx:HSCT was 50 (26-65):57 (32-68) yrs; med interval dx to HSCT 5.8 yrs (0.5 to 29). Most pts (78, 76%) received non-ablative therapy; (n=61 [60%] reduced-intensity fludarabine /busulfan [flu/bu] based [RIC], n=17 [17%] non-myeloablative flu-cyclophosphamide based [NMA]); 24 pts had myeloablative (MA) conditioning (CON). Donor status was 50% unrelated (UD) (51UD:51RD); 73M, 28 F. Results: With median (med) follow up (FU) (range) post allo-HSCT of 2 yrs (0.5-18); post dx of 9 yrs (1-38), 67 (50%) pts survive. 70 (69%) achieved CR post-HSCT a med of 187 (28-1274) days (d). 27 had CLL PROG a med of 339 (25-4367) d; 18 of 27 (67%) survive a med of 3 (0.5-18) yrs post HSCT. Factors pred OS post HSCT (KM p=; UVA HR=) (p<0.05) were: pre-HSCT FISH deletion 17p (del 17p) (0.005; 2.9), Dohner rank (0.02), HSCT specific comorbidity index (CoI) >3 vs. 0-2 (0.04; 2.5), HLA mismatched (MM) donor (0.03;2.3), pre-HSCT tx with alemtuzumab (alem) (0.005;3.0), CON (MA vs NMA or RIC) (0.046; 3.0), acute (A) graft vs host disease (GVHD) grade (g) 3-4 vs 0-2. (<0.001; 4.5), dn chim <90% (0.001; 5.2), abn FISH not clear post-HSCT (0.009; 2.6), yr of HSCT (pre- vs post-2010) (0.03; 3.13) and lack of CR post HSCT (<0.001; 10.5).The following sig pred for (OR; p=): >90% dn chim: no B symptoms at dx (2.5; 0.004), CON (RIC vs. NMA, (2.6; 0.006); clear FISH abn post-HSCT: CR post-HSCT (4.6; 0.004); CR post-HSCT: B symptoms at dx (0.4; 0.02), <=1 FISH abn (1.7; 0.045), rituximab (R) pre-HSCT (2.5; 0.001), clear FISH abn (2.5; 0.01), flu sensitivity (S) pre-HSCT (1.8; 0.03), S to last tx pre-HSCT (1.7; 0.03), CON (MA vs. RIC or NMA) (3.2; <0.001); PROG: Richter’s transformation ( Rich trans) pre-HSCT (3.5; 0.008), graft failure (3.3; 0.008), CoI >3 vs. 0-2 (6.9; 0.006), no R pre-HSCT (6.7; 0.01), CON (MA vs. NMA or RIC), (0.2; 0.03); NRM: pre-HSCT alem (2.7; 0.03), CoI >3 vs. 0-2 (2.7; 0.049), HLA MM (2.8; 0.01), CON (MA vs. rest) (3.0; 0.007), AGVHD g 3-4 vs. 0-2 (5.9; <0.001), FISH abn not clear (2.6; 0.04), and no CR (6.5; <0.001). Comparison bn allo-HSCT and BCPCD CLL pts showed sig diff at dx for Dohner FISH rank: more del 17p (23% vs.11%) and 11q (23% vs. 9%) in allo-HSCT pts (n=84 with pre-HSCT FISH); less +12 (13% vs. 17%), del 13q (24% vs.41%) or normal (22% vs 18%), p<0.001 than non-HSCT pts (n=952); Age at dx (med, range) was lower in HSCT (50, 26-65) vs non (62, 25-96), p<0.001; lymphocyte (lymph) count higher (14, 1-300 vs.11, 1-662, p=0.03), tx-free survival (TFS) from dx to 1st tx shorter at 0.75 (0-9.3) vs. 2.86 (0-20.6) yrs. Rich trans was more frequent in HSCT pts (8%) vs. non (3%), p=0.015.OS was sig better for HSCT pts (n=103) (med 17.6, SE 4.5, CI 95% 8.8-26) compared to non (n=494) (med 14.4, SE 1.1, CI 95% 12.1-16.6) (p=0.03). Conclusion: CLL allo-HSCT pts have sig diff than non including higher lymph at dx, shorter time to 1st tx, and higher risk FISH abn. 17p del remains high-risk with allo-HSCT. Pre-HSCT R increased post HSCT CR. Strategies to optimize post-HSCT CR and dn chim are important; these milestones are crucial to best outcome. PROG post-HSCT does not confer worse OS; rescue strategies are successful and deserve further study. Comparison of this large allo HSCT and pop-based BPCDB cohort indicate improved OS for allo-HSCT tx CLL pts vs. other, with a survival plateau. This data indicates early recognition of high-risk CLL patients for HSCT is likely to yield best long-term outcome. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Outcome and Prevalence of Hyperdiploidy and Hypodiploidy in Adults with Newly Diagnosed Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia: A SWOG Study

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2555-2555
Author(s):  
Anjali S. Advani ◽  
Holly Gundacker ◽  
Marilyn L. Slovak ◽  
Karl S. Theil ◽  
Stephen J. Forman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Poor Risk ◽  
Poor Outcomes

Abstract Abstract 2555 High hyperdiploidy is present in 30% of children with acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), and is associated with a favorable prognosis. We evaluated pts with newly diagnosed ALL treated on SWOG trials S9400 (1995–2000) and S0333 (2005–2010) to determine the prevalence and prognostic impact of hyperdiploidy in adults with ALL. Additionally, we examined the prognostic impact of hypodiploidy, a feature typically associated with a poor prognosis in children. Methods: One-hundred and eighty-five pts treated on S9400 and S0333 with successful cytogenetic (CG) analysis were included. The treatment regimens were: S9400 [Induction: Daunorubicin (D), vincristine (V), prednisone (P), PEG-asparaginase (PEG); Consolidation: Cytoxan (Cy), cytarabine (AraC), 6-mercaptopurine (6MP), intrathecal methotrexate (IT Mtx). Consolidation was followed by allogeneic stem cell transplant or maintenance chemotherapy] and S0333: Double Induction Chemotherapy [Induction 1: D, V, P, PEG; Induction 2: high dose AraC, mitoxantrone, decadron. Consolidation: Cy, AraC, 6MP, Mtx; consolidation was followed by maintenance therapy]. Karyotypes were centrally reviewed and clonal abnormalities described according to ISCN (2009). Hyperdiploidy was defined as: low hyperdiploidy [47–49 chromosomes (cs)], high hyperdiploidy (51–65 cs), near triploidy (66–79 cs), and near tetraploidy (84–100 cs). Hypodiploidy was defined as: near haploidy (25–29 cs), low hypodiploidy (31–39 cs), and high hypodiploidy (42–45 cs). When more than one cell line was present, ploidy was assigned by the most complex clonal karyotype. Hypodiploidy and hyperdiploidy were analyzed as prognostic factors for complete response (CR) rate and residual disease (RD) by logistic regression and chi-square tests; and for overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) by proportional hazards. Multivariable analyses were stratified by study and using the baseline variables: age, WBC, lineage, and CG risk. Results: The median age was 32 yrs (range 17–64), and median WBC at diagnosis 17.2 K/uL (range 0.6–396.6). CG risk was ascribed by (Pullarket V et al. Blood 2008; 111: 2563). Forty-five pts (24%) had normal CG, and 73 (39%) had poor risk CG. Fourteen pts (8%) had hypodiploidy (2: low hypodiploidy; 12: high hypodiploidy). Fifty-three pts (29%) had hyperdiploidy [40: low hyperdiploidy, 10: high hyperdiploidy (5%), 3: near tetraploidy or tetraploidy (2%)]. The CR rate for all pts was 72%; with a median RFS of 15 mos (95% CI: 12–29 mos) and median OS of 28 mos (95% CI: 21–36 mos). There was no significant association with ploidy status and age, WBC, or lineage. However, there was an increased prevalence of the t(9;22) in the high hypodiploidy group compared to the normal/pseudo diploidy group (p=0.049). Neither hypodiploidy nor hyperdiploidy were predictive of CR or RD; although pts with hypodiploidy had a higher rate of RD (p=0.062). The 2 pts with low hypodiploidy had very poor outcomes (1 had RD and died after 11 mos; the other relapsed after 3 mos from CR and died 4 mos after study registration). There were no statistically significant differences in OS, CR rate, or RFS between the ploidy groups even after adjusting for baseline characteristics in multivariate analysis. Surprisingly, when excluding pts with poor risk CG there was still a trend towards a worse RFS (29 vs. 32 months, p=0.20) and OS (40 vs. 68 mos, p=0.29) in pts with hyperdiploidy compared to normal/pseudodiploidy. In addition, the 3 pts in the high hyperdiploidy group without poor risk CG had poor OS (median 23 mos). Conclusions: The prevalence of high hyperdiploidy is much lower in adults with ALL, compared to children. The prevalence of hypodiploidy and near tetraploidy/tetraploidy is comparable to that seen in children with ALL. Hypodiploidy and high hyperdiploidy were not prognostic factors for outcome in this group of patients. Given the low prevalence of these abnormalities, it is possible that larger numbers of pts may be needed to detect such a difference. The poor outcomes of pts with low hypodiploidy are consistent with findings by Moorman et al. (Blood 2006; 109: 3189). However, in contrast to Moorman's results, there was no evidence of an association of hyperdiploidy with age/WBC, and there was a trend towards a worse prognosis in this subset of patients. This suggests that the biology and prognosis of high hyperdiploidy may be affected more by WBC and age in the adult population. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

High-Dose Cyclophosphamide In Combination With G-CSF Versus G-CSF Alone For Mobilization Of Hematopoietic Stem Cells After Induction Therapy Including Velcade, Cyclophosphamide and Dexacort

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 5369-5369
Author(s):  
Noam Benyamini ◽  
Irit Avivi ◽  
Eldad J Dann ◽  
Tsila Zuckerman ◽  
Lavi Noa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Difference

Abstract Introduction Even in the era of novel agents, high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is considered to be an essential part of treatment for young patients with multiple myeloma (MM), providing durable responses. Currently, VCD (velcade, cyclophosphamide and dexacort) is one of the most commonly employed induction regimens. High-dose cyclophosphamide (HDC), often used in stem cell (SC) mobilization in conjunction with G-CSF, is associated with adverse events and only modest efficacy against myeloma. An alternative mobilization regimen, using G-SCF alone, has been recently suggested to provide adequate SC collection with less toxicity. Nevertheless, the efficacy and safety of using G-SCF alone after VCD induction have not been fully explored. The current study compares the safety and efficacy of mobilization using HDC-G-CSF versus G-CSF alone in MM patients treated with VCD as induction therapy. Methods The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Rambam Medical Center (Approval # 0110-13 RMB). Data on all consecutive newly diagnosed transplant-eligible MM patients, treated with VCD between 2009 and 2012, were retrospectively reviewed. Eligibility criteria were: VCD induction followed by SC mobilization, either with G-CSF or HDC-G-CSF, with subsequent high-dose melphalan (200 mg/m2) and ASCT. The mobilization protocol was chosen at the discretion of the treating physician. Evaluated data included patient characteristics, SC collection and engraftment related parameters. For statistical analysis, Mann-Whitney non-parametric test for 2 independent groups was used. Results 79 patients were included: 50 mobilized with HDC-G-CSF, and 29 with G-CSF alone. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of patient demographic and MM-related characteristics (MM type, ISS, number of VCD cycles, and disease status at the end of induction) between the 2 cohorts. The first day of SC collection yielded a median of 14.6x106 (range 1.9 -10.1) vs 5.3x106 CD34 cells/Kg (range 0.6-37.7) in the HDC-G-CSF vs the G-CSF groups (p=<0.001). A significantly higher total CD34 collection was obtained in the HDC-G-CSF treated patients (15.9 x 106 vs 8.1x106 CD34 cells/Kg, respectively, P<0.001). Additionally, a bivariate analysis showed that male gender and platelet count (>150,000/mL) prior to mobilization had a significant impact on the outcome of SC collection. The percentage of patients needing more than one day of leukopheresis following HDC-G-CSF and G-CSF was 42% and 83%, respectively. During treatment and mobilization, 20% of patients in the HDC-G-CSF cohort were hospitalized due to neutropenic fever, while none of the patients from the G-CSF group required hospitalization (P<0.011). In all patients apart from one (G-CSF group), at least the minimum of CD34 cells/Kg required to perform a transplant (2x106 CD34 cells/Kg) was collected. Moreover, most patients succeeded in collecting >5x106 CD34 cells/Kg (96% and 93.1% in HDC-G-CSF and G-CSF groups, respectively). Notably, the difference between the groups achieved statistical significance only in collection of >8x106 CD34 cells/Kg (88% and 55.2% of patients treated with HDC-G-CSF and G-CSF, respectively). The median amount of cells administered at transplantation was 7.9x106 and 4.9x106 for patients mobilized with HDC-G-CSF vs G-CSF, respectively, reflecting the difference in the total amount of collected cells. Despite the variation in the amount of transplanted cells, no significant difference in parameters of the transplant outcome was revealed between the 2 cohorts:  time to neutrophil engraftment (>500 cells/µl) at a median of 12 days in both groups and platelets engraftment (>25,000 cells/µl) at a median of 14.5 vs 13 days in the HDC-G-CSF and G-CSF groups, respectively. The length of hospitalization, approaching 17 days, did not differ between the 2 groups. Conclusions Mobilization using HDC-G-CSF results in a higher total amount of collected CD34 cells and requires less days of leukophersis. Nevertheless, G-CSF alone provides a sufficient number of SC for transplantation in almost all patients, and this approach is much safer than treatment with HDC-G-CSF. Since engraftment results are identical with the 2 mobilization methods, the use of G-CSF alone could be considered as a preferable cell mobilization protocol in patients previously exposed to VCD induction. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Autoimmune Complications in Hematologic Neoplasms

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 1532
Author(s):  
Wilma Barcellini ◽  
Juri Alessandro Giannotta ◽  
Bruno Fattizzo
Keyword(s):  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽  
Pure Red Cell Aplasia ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Acute Leukemias ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Diagnostic Difficulties

Autoimmune cytopenias (AICy) and autoimmune diseases (AID) can complicate both lymphoid and myeloid neoplasms, and often represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. While autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) and immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) are well known, other rarer AICy (autoimmune neutropenia, aplastic anemia, and pure red cell aplasia) and AID (systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, vasculitis, thyroiditis, and others) are poorly recognized. This review analyses the available literature of the last 30 years regarding the occurrence of AICy/AID in different onco-hematologic conditions. The latter include chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), lymphomas, multiple myeloma, myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), myeloproliferative neoplasms, and acute leukemias. On the whole, AICy are observed in up to 10% of CLL and with higher frequencies in certain subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, whilst they occur in less than 1% of low-risk MDS and CMML. AID are described in up to 30% of myeloid and lymphoid patients, including immune-mediated hemostatic disorders (acquired hemophilia, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, and anti-phospholipid syndrome) that may be severe and fatal. Additionally, AICy/AID are found in about 10% of patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplant or treatment with new checkpoint inhibitors. Besides the diagnostic difficulties, these AICy/AID may complicate the clinical management of already immunocompromised patients.

scholarly journals 577. Incidence and Outcomes of Positive Outpatient Surveillance Blood Cultures in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) Patients with Graft Versus Host Disease (GvHD) On High Dose ≥ 0.5 mg/kg/day (HD) and Low Dose < 0.5mg/kg/day (LD) Steroid Therapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S353-S354
Author(s):  
Sarah Perreault ◽  
Molly Schiffer ◽  
Jennifer Zhao ◽  
Dayna McManus ◽  
Francine Foss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Steroid Therapy ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Coagulase Negative Staphylococci ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Surveillance Cultures ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Clinically Significant

Abstract Background Treatment of GvHD with steroids increases the risk of infection in HSCT patients due to additive immunosuppression and may delay the diagnosis of infection due to lack of symptoms. Outpatient surveillance blood cultures in HSCT with GvHD being treated with HD steroids has demonstrated a blood culture positivity rate of 3.5%. Currently, the utility of surveillance cultures in patients receiving LD steroid therapy is unknown. Our practice includes weekly outpatient surveillance cultures for all GvHD patients treated with steroids regardless of the dose. The primary endpoint of this study was to assess the incidence of positive surveillance blood cultures in GvHD patients receiving HD or LD steroids. Secondary endpoints included number of patients treated, hospitalization, 30 day mortality due to infection, and organisms isolated. Methods This was a single-center, retrospective review of GvHD patients at Yale New Haven Hospital between January 2013 and May 2019. Patients were excluded if: lack of signs or symptoms of GvHD, treatment with steroids for any indication other than GvHD, and active GvHD without central line. Cultures from patients receiving antibiotics for concurrent infection were also excluded. Results A total of 71 patients met criteria with 901 blood cultures. On HD, eight patients (14%) had 12 positive cultures (4%), and on LD, 16 patients (25%) had 22 positive cultures (4%) (p=0.15). Treatment occurred in six patients (75%) with four (24%) requiring hospitalization on HD, and 12 patients (75%) with 10 (83%) requiring hospitalization on LD (p=0.45). The median duration of steroid therapy was 93 and 236 days with a median dose of steroids of 1mg/kg/day and 0.15mg/kg/day, respectively. The number of positive cultures/1000 steroid days was 1.2 on HD and 0.5 on LD (RR 2.2). 30 day mortality was only noted in one patient (8%) on LD. The most common organism in both groups was Coagulase-negative staphylococci with all six cultures on HD classified as contaminants and 6/10 cultures requiring treatment on LD. Conclusion Although the relative risk of positive surveillance blood cultures in HD patients compared to LD was twofold higher, there were clinically significant infections identified in the LD group. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Ripk3 Signaling Regulates Hematopoietic Stem Cell Number and Function during Stress

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3714-3714
Author(s):  
Lei Zhang ◽  
Huacheng Luo ◽  
Jing Li ◽  
Hong-Min Ni ◽  
Mark Sellin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Cytokines ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Low Doses ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Leukemia Development ◽  
Serial Transplantation

Background: Among all tissues, bone marrow (BM) is the most sensitive tissue to ionizing radiation (IR)-induced acute tissue damage (ATD) and chronic long-term residual damage (LT-RD). BM failure and a significant reduction in blood cells (pancytopenia) often occurs within days after exposure to IR due to the massive death of proliferative hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs). However, due to their quiescent cell cycle status and reduced fidelity of DNA repair feature, many hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) cannot fully eliminate such damage and enter senescence; this results in LT-RD. Abnormal dysplastic hematopoiesis is the most common LT-RD in most victims of IR, followed by an increased risk of leukemia/lymphoma development. Thus IR exposure is an established cause of BM failure and leukemia. A significant increase in the production of inflammatory cytokines is induced by IR which contributes to the pathogenesis of both ATD and LT-RD. Such inflammatory cytokines induce the activation of Ripk3-Mlkl-mediated necroptotic signaling in HSCs. However, the role of Ripk3-Mlkl signaling in IR-induced damage has not studied. Experimental procedures: The self-renewal capacity of HSCs among Ripk3-/-, Mlkl-/- and WT mice were examined and compared by serial transplantation assay. The phenotypes of ATD and LT-RD induced by different dosages of IR were compared among Ripk3-/-, Mlkl-/- and WT mice. The mechanism by which Ripk3 signaling prevents IR-induced leukemia development was studied. Results: Ripk3-Mlkl signaling is not required for hematopoiesis during homeostatic condition. However, during serial transplantation, inactivation of such signaling prevents stress-induced loss of HSCs. Interestingly, Ripk3 signaling also induces an Mlkl-independent ROS-p38-p16-mediated senescence in HSCs. Thus Ripk3-/- HSCs showed better competitive hematopoietic ability compared to Mlkl-/- and WT HSCs during serial transplantation. A sub-lethal dosage of IR (6Gy) induces Ripk3-dependent NF-κB activation and pro-survival gene expression in HSCs, which is necessary for the survival of damaged HSCs. After 6Gy IR, although DNA damage is repaired in most HSCs within 2 days, a proportion of HSCs in WT and Mlkl-/- mice fail to fully repair the damage and undergo p53-p21-dependent senescence. However such cells in Ripk3-/- mice die from apoptosis. Thus the remaining HSCs in Ripk3-/- mice should be functionally normal, while a proportion of the remaining HSCs in Mlkl-/- and WT mice remain damaged but senescent, all as demonstrated by competitive hematopoietic reconstitution assay. Multiple low-doses of IR (1.75Gy once week × 4) induce HSC exhaustion in WT mice but not in Ripk3-/- and Mlkl-/- mice. Interestingly, almost all Ripk3-/- mice develop acute lymphoblastic leukemia within 200 days after such low dose IR, while 45% of WT and 60% of Mlkl-/- mice develop thymomas within 360 days (see Figure). Mechanistically, such low-dose IR stimulates chronic inflammatory cytokine production. Such cytokines induce Ripk3-Mlkl-mediated necroptosis in response to HSC exhaustion observed in WT mice. These cytokines also induce Ripk3-ROS-p38-p16-mediated senescence in response to impaired HSC functioning observed in both WT and Mlkl-/- mice. In Ripk3-/- mice, due to the lack of both necroptotic and senescent signaling, mutant HSCs accumulate and leukemia development is accelerated. Conclusion: Ripk3 signaling plays distinct roles in HSCs in response to different doses of IR. High-dose IR induces Ripk3-dependent NF-κB/survival signaling, which is required for the survival of HSCs which fail to repair the damage. Thus temporal inhibition of Ripk3-NF-κB signaling might help to remove the damaged HSCs thus preventing the occurrence of LT-RD. However multiple low-doses of IR induces Ripk3 activation in HSCs which represses leukemia development by inducing both ROS-p38-p16-mediated senescence and Ripk3-Mlkl-mediated necroptosis. Induced activation of Mlkl-necroptosis might help to repress leukemia development by removing damaged HSCs. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals The Platelet Millionaire: A Rare Cause of Thrombocytosis in an Adolescent

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5391-5391
Author(s):  
Ritika Walia ◽  
Theresa Sepulveda ◽  
Sharon Wretzel ◽  
Philip H Brandt
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Bone Marrow Biopsy ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Abdominal Ultrasound ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Peripheral Smear ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Marrow Fibrosis

Objectives: Primary myelofibrosis is rare in pediatrics, often manifesting as persistent idiopathic thrombocytosis.Transitions from pediatric to adult medical care can be complicated by workup requiring invasive procedures. J.M., an 18-year-old healthy male, presented for excessive gingival bleeding after wisdom tooth extraction. Workup revealed persistent thrombocytosis to 1,165K, prompting a referral to hematology-oncology. A peripheral smear was notable for many platelets but normal RBC morphology. He had splenomegaly on abdominal ultrasound and a decreased von-Willebrand's activity to antigen ratio, suggesting acquired vWD. A bone marrow biopsy was advised; however, J.M. became lost to follow up for over 9 months owing to self-reported anxiety about the procedure. He remained asymptomatic in this interim until he re-presented to clinic for easy bruising, with no other evidence of bleeding at the time. The biopsy was pursued, revealing hypercellular marrow for age with left shifted granulocytic and erythroid maturation, abnormal megakaryocytes, and 3% blasts. This was consistent with primary early myelofibrosis (PMF), positive for MF-1, CALR, and TP53 mutations and negative for JAK2 and BCR-ABL. He was transitioned to adult hematology, maintained on baby aspirin, and referred for potential allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). PMF is characterized by marrow fibrosis due to secretion of fibroblast growth factor by clonally proliferative megakaryocytes. It is a disease of adulthood, with 67 years being the median age at diagnosis. Only 100 cases have been reported in children, most of which are secondary to AML, ALL or other malignancies.1 Most patients present with complications of extramedullary hematopoiesis or bleeding.2 Diagnosis is suggested by a leukoerythroblastic picture on peripheral smear and confirmed with a bone marrow biopsy "dry tap" revealing marrow fibrosis.3 Prognosis in pediatric PMF is difficult to predict but outcomes tend to be worse;4 TP53 mutation is rare and based on limited adult studies may portend a poorer prognosis.5 Our young patient with this rare mutation was therefore referred for HSCT evaluation. Further complicating this case was J.M.'s anxiety, which delayed definitive diagnosis by biopsy. He only agreed to it when, at the med-peds clinic, the concept of local pain management was discussed. Anticipation of upcoming procedures by primary care physicians and close follow-up is especially important for patients transitioning from pediatric to adult providers. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Expanding the Indications for Ibrutinib: Complete Remission Obtained By Induction with Ibrutinib Followed By Consolidative Ahsct in Refractory Primary CNS Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5631-5631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cassidy Brothers
Keyword(s):  
Complete Remission ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Salvage Therapy ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Salvage Treatment ◽  
Severe Neutropenia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem

Introduction Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is an exceedingly rare and aggressive sub-type of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. Despite initial polychemotherapy that includes High-Dose Methotrexate (HD-MTX), over half of patients will develop recurrent or refractory disease that requires salvage therapy.1 Ibrutinib, a Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has become an alternative for salvage treatment in relapsed or refractory PCNSL (RR-PCNSL) that is particularly useful in patients who are ineligible for re-induction with HD-chemo. In RR-PCNSL, Ibrutinib led to a progression free survival (PFS) of roughly 5 months when used as monotherapy2,3 and 15 months when used as add-on therapy.4 While its role as salvage treatment has been documented, its use to facilitate consolidative autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) in RR-PCNSL is not currently known. The following case describes the first known report of a patient with RR-PCNSL who achieved persistent complete remission following Ibrutinib salvage treatment and consolidative AHSCT. Case Description A 64-year-old male presented to the emergency department with a two-week history ptosis, visual abnormalities, confusion, and increasing fatigue. On physical exam, he was found to have bilateral mydriasis, left third nerve cranial palsy, severe left-sided ptosis, and restricted upwards and downward gaze of the right eye. A contrast-CT was performed which showed multiple areas of abnormal enhancement throughout the frontal lobes, corpus callosum, and midbrain associated with significant vasogenic edema. These findings were confirmed on MRI. He underwent a stereotactic guided burr hole biopsy which was consistent with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Immunohistochemistry performed on the tissue showed that the neoplastic cells were CD3(-), CD5(-), CD20(+), CD10(-), BCL2(subset +), BCL6(+), MUM1(+) and Cyclin D1(-). Staging CT and bone marrow biopsy showed no evidence of systemic disease. He was diagnosed with PCNSL and went on to receive induction therapy with Rituximab, Methotrexate, Procarbazine, and Vincristine (R-MPV) with curative intent and received a total of 7 cycles. Initially, he had a significant radiographic response with a repeat MRI post cycle 4 showing only a few small areas of residual enhancement. However, after completion of the 7 cycles of R-MPV, his MRI showed evidence of disease progression with both new and enlarging intra-axial lesions. Given his ECOG of 0 and lack of comorbidities, it was decided that he would proceed with salvage treatment with Cytarabine and Etoposide with curative intent for refractory PCNSL. Unfortunately, after only four weeks of receiving cycle one of Cytarabine and Etoposide, a repeat MRI showed evidence of disease progression. He was then transitioned to palliative therapy with prednisone up until December 2017, at which point he was able to obtain Ibrutinib on a compassionate basis. He was started on Ibrutinib salvage therapy and achieved radiographic evidence of complete remission after four months of treatment. There were minimal adverse effects of Ibrutinib therapy, most notably a severe neutropenia requiring a temporary discontinuation of therapy for two weeks. He underwent consolidative AHSCT with Thiotepa, Busulfan and Melphalan conditioning in August 2018. His post-transplant course was complicated by culture negative febrile neutropenia with a subsequent source determined to be Clostridium difficile for which he was treated. An MRI head performed 3 months after his AHSCT showed no evidence of recurrent or residual disease. He continues to be followed by the Hematology Service in Newfoundland and has remained in complete remission since. Conclusions This case demonstrates the feasibility of a salvage approach using Ibrutinib followed by AHSCT when standard salvage options have been exhausted in refractory PCNSL. OffLabel Disclosure: Ibrutinib's indications do not currently include use as a induction treatment prior to AHSCT in refractory/recurrent PCNSL.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document