Reduced Activity of the OCT-1 Protein in Primitive CML Cells: A Likely Determinant of Stem Cell Resistance in Imatinib Treated CML Patients

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 196-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane R Engler ◽  
Amity Frede ◽  
Andrew C W Zannettino ◽  
Deborah L White ◽  
Timothy P Hughes

Abstract Despite cytogenetic and molecular remissions, residual chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) cells persist in the primitive CD34+ compartment in the majority of imatinib treated patients. It has been demonstrated that CD34+ CML cells have a reduced sensitivity to imatinib induced apoptosis. Factors which may contribute to this reduced sensitivity are reduced dependence on BCR-ABL, an increase in BCR-ABL transcripts, increased expression of efflux proteins or decreased expression of drug influx proteins. Our previous studies show that a patient’s intrinsic sensitivity to imatinib-induced kinase inhibition (IC50) is related to the intracellular uptake and retention (IUR) of imatinib in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The organic cation transporter 1 (OCT-1) is the major active influx transporter for imatinib in these cells, and the functional activity of this protein (determined using functional inhibition of OCT-1, in the IUR assay) directly correlates with molecular response to imatinib. In the present study we investigated the role that OCT-1 plays in stem cell resistance to imatinib. Primitive CD34+ and mature CD34− cells were isolated from CML patients and normal individuals using magnetic cell sorting. CML CD34+ cells had a significantly lower IURimatinib than that of CML CD34− cells (Table 1). The addition of the OCT-1 inhibitor, prazosin (100μM), eliminated this difference in IUR (Table 1), indicating that variation in IURimatinib is due to variation in the functional activity of the OCT-1 protein. In addition, the OCT-1 Activity (Table 1) and OCT-1 mRNA expression (expressed as % of BCR: mean CD34+=0.25; CD34−=4.9, p=0.040, n=10) was significantly lower in CML CD34+ cells compared with CML CD34− cells. These differences in IURimatinib and OCT-1 activity between CD34+ and CD34− cells were not observed in normal individuals (Table 1), suggesting this phenomenon is specific to leukemic cells. Furthermore, we isolated the more primitive compartment, CD34+38− cells and less primitive CD34+38+ cells in 4 CML patients. The CD34+38− cells demonstrated a 13% reduction in IURimatinib and a 41% reduction in OCT-1 activity compared with CD34+38+ cells. These data suggest a reduced IUR mediated by low OCT-1 function and/or expression may play a role in the resistance of CML stem cells to imatinib. Table 1: The IUR of 2μM imatinib expressed as ng/200,000 cells (standard deviation) n Imatinib IUR P value + Prazosin P value OCT-1 Activity P value CML CD34+ 14 16.05 (4.53) 0.002 13.02 (3.34) 0.505 3.25 (2.32) <0.001 CML CD34− 14 27.28 (12.92) 14.76 (5.25) 14.01 (12.08) Normal CD34+ 11 11.13 (2.66) 0.212 10.43 (3.80) 0.743 2.03 (2.09) 0.693 Normal CD34− 11 13.92 (5.32) 10.93 (3.30) 3.52 (5.24) Increased expression of efflux transporters of imatinib (i.e. ABCB1 and ABCG2) has been suggested as an important mechanism for drug resistance. The effect of an ABCB1 inhibitor (PSC833) and ABCG2 inhibitor (Ko143) was assessed in CD34+ cells from 3 CML patients, using the IUR assay. Neither of these drugs had any effect on the IURimatinib in CML CD34+ cells. Additionally the mRNA expression of ABCB1 did not differ between CML CD34+ and CD34− cells (expressed as a % of BCR: mean CD34+=33.7; CD34−=33.77, p=0.064, n=10). These data suggest that alterations in imatinib influx (via OCT-1) are more critical for development of stem cell resistance rather than differences in efflux. We have previously demonstrated that, unlike imatinib, the OCT-1 protein is not involved in nilotinib transport, as the addition of OCT-1 inhibitors does not alter IURnilotinib in patients. Assessing the IUR of nilotinib in CD34+ and CD34− CML cells reveals no significant difference between the two populations (Table 2). Additionally, the IURnilotinib is significantly higher than IURimatinib in CML CD34+ cells (Table 2). In summary, the reduced OCT-1 mediated uptake of imatinib in more primitive, CD34+ CML cells may result in inadequate kinase inhibition and contribute to stem cell resistance in CML. Since nilotinib uptake into CML CD34+ cells is not impaired in the same manner as imatinib, more substantial depletion of the primitive CML cells may be achieved. Table 2: The IUR of 2μM imatinib and nilotinib in the same 11 CML patients. Expressed as ng/200,000 cells (standard deviation) n Imatinib IUR P value Nilotinib IUR P value P value between imatinib & nilotinib IUR CML CD34+ 11 17.80 (5.73) 0.006 26.35 (7.54) 0.230 0.007 CML CD34− 11 30.28 (12.33) 22.05 (8.68) 0.076

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4848-4848
Author(s):  
Brad Rybinski ◽  
Ashraf Z. Badros ◽  
Aaron P. Rapoport ◽  
Mehmet Hakan Kocoglu

Abstract Introduction: Standard induction therapy for multiple myeloma consists of 3-6 cycles of bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) or carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRd). Receiving greater than 6 cycles of a lenalidomide containing regimen is thought to negatively impact the ability to collect sufficient CD34+ stem cells for autologous stem cell transplant (Kumar, Dispenzieri et al. 2007, Bhutani, Zonder et al. 2013). Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, at least 20 patients at University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center (UMGCC) had transplant postponed, potentially resulting in prolonged exposure to lenalidomide containing induction regimens. Here, in the context of modern stem cell mobilization methods, we describe a retrospective study that suggests prolonged induction does not inhibit adequate stem cell collection for transplant. Methods: By chart review, we identified 56 patients with multiple myeloma who received induction with VRd or KRd and underwent apheresis or stem cell transplant at UMGCC between 10/1/19 and 10/1/20. Patients were excluded if they received more than 2 cycles of a different induction regimen, had a past medical history of an inborn hematological disorder, or participated in a clinical trial of novel stem cell mobilization therapy. We defined 1 cycle of VRd or KRd as 1 cycle of "lenalidomide containing regimen". In accordance with routine clinical practice, we defined standard induction as having received 3-6 cycles of lenalidomide containing regimen and prolonged induction as having received 7 or more cycles. Results: 29 patients received standard induction (Standard induction cohort) and 27 received prolonged induction (Prolonged induction cohort) with lenalidomide containing regimens. The median number of cycles received by the Standard cohort was 6 (range 4-6), and the median number of cycles received by the Prolonged cohort was 8 (range 7-13). The frequency of KRd use was similar between patients who received standard induction and prolonged induction (27.58% vs. 25.93%, respectively). Standard induction and Prolonged induction cohorts were similar with respect to clinical characteristics (Fig 1), as well as the mobilization regimen used for stem cell collection (p = 0.6829). 55/56 patients collected sufficient stem cells for 1 transplant (≥ 4 x 10 6 CD34 cells/kg), and 40/56 patients collected sufficient cells for 2 transplants (≥ 8 x 10 6 CD34 cells/kg). There was no significant difference in the total CD34+ stem cells collected at completion of apheresis between standard and prolonged induction (10.41 and 10.45 x 10 6 CD34 cells/kg, respectively, p = 0.968, Fig 2). Furthermore, there was no significant correlation between the number of cycles of lenalidomide containing regimen a patient received and total CD34+ cells collected (R 2 = 0.0073, p = 0.5324). Although prolonged induction did not affect final stem yield, prolonged induction could increase the apheresis time required for adequate collection or result in more frequent need for plerixafor rescue. There was no significant difference in the total number of stem cells collected after day 1 of apheresis between patients who received standard or prolonged induction (8.72 vs. 7.96 x 10 6 cells/kg, respectively, p = 0.557). However, patients who received prolonged induction were more likely to require 2 days of apheresis (44% vs. 25%, p = 0.1625) and there was a trend toward significance in which patients who received prolonged induction underwent apheresis longer than patients who received standard induction (468 vs 382 minutes, respectively, p = 0.0928, Fig 3). In addition, longer apheresis time was associated with more cycles of lenalidomide containing regimen, which neared statistical significance (R 2 = 0.0624, p = 0.0658, Fig 4). There was no significant difference between standard and prolonged induction with respect to the frequency of plerixafor rescue. Conclusions: Prolonged induction with lenalidomide containing regimens does not impair adequate stem cell collection for autologous transplant. Prolonged induction may increase the apheresis time required to collect sufficient stem cells for transplant, but ultimately clinicians should be re-assured that extending induction when necessary is not likely to increase the risk of collection failure. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Badros: Janssen: Research Funding; J&J: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-200
Author(s):  
Yestiani Norita Joni ◽  
Busjra M Nur ◽  
Fitrian Rayasari

The purpose of this study is to know the effectiveness of intradialysis exercise using barbells and Range of Motion (ROM) on the adequacy of hemodialysis in patients with chronic kidney disease in the hemodialysis room of RSIJ Sukapura in 2018. The design of this study uses a design with non-probability pre and post test two groups without control design . The result of the difference in the effectiveness of the adequacy values between the two intervention groups after the intervention was given was the barbell intervention obtained 1,33 with a standard deviation of 0.485, an error standard of 0.114. Whereas in the ROM intervention group 1.67 the standard deviation was 0.485, the standard error was 0.114 and the p-value was 0.047 (> 0.05). Conclusion, there was no significant difference in the value of hemodialysis adequacy between the barbellROM intervention groups after the intervention.   Keywords: Hemodialysis Adequacy, Barbell, Exercise Effectiveness, Intradialysis, Range Of Motion (ROM)


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3254-3254
Author(s):  
Francesco Mazziotta ◽  
Gabriele Buda ◽  
Nadia Cecconi ◽  
Giulia Cervetti ◽  
Lorenzo Iovino ◽  
...  

INTRODUCTION Multiple myeloma (MM) is considered an incurable disease. Despite the introduction of novel agents allowed deeper response, high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remain the standard of care for patients (pts) in good clinical conditions. The most used strategies to mobilize stem cells from bone marrow (BM) into peripheral blood are high-dose cyclophosphamide (HD-CTX) plus G-CSF and G-CSF plus plerixafor (G-CSF+P). The goal of this retrospective study is to investigate whether the two different mobilization strategies have an impact on the clearance of monoclonal PCs in the apheresis products and on pts' outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed 62 pts (median age 61, range 41-75, 37 males and 25 women) diagnosed with MM and treated with ASCT between Mar 2014 and Mar 2018 at our Hematology Division (Pisa, Italy). All pts received induction therapy with at least 4 cycles of bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone (VTD). 9/62 pts obtained a less than partial response (PR) and received lenalidomide-based regimens. After induction, 8 (12,9%) pts achieved complete remission (CR), 26 (41,9%) were in PR, 28 (45,2%) obtained a very good partial response (VGPR). 43/62 fit pts received HD-CTX (2-3 g/sqm) on day 1 followed by G-CSF (30 MU/day) started on day 4 until day 7, increased to 60 MU/day from day 8 until the end of apheresis. In 19/62 pts, after 4 days of G-CSF (60 MU/day) administration and not sufficient mobilization, we added plerixafor (0,24 mg/kgbw) for up to 4 consecutive days. In 43/62 pts we collected apheresis samples (10μl) analyzed through flow citometry to enumerate clonal residual PCs. The panel used to asses clonality included: CD138 Per-Cp, CD38 APC, CD19 PE-Cy7, CD45 APC-Cy7, cytoplasmic immunoglobulin K chain and L chain. RESULTS At the end of the peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection, pts treated with HD-CTX presented a higher CD34+ absolute count (p=0.0489) and achieved the threshold of 5x106 CD34+ cells/kgbw in a significantly (p=0.006) higher percentage. We found a nearly significant (p=0.0517) lower count of CD34+ PBSCs in pts who received lenalidomide-based regimens before the mobilization. Performing flow citometry on apheresis samples, we observed that the number of the harvested clonal PCs showed a significant correlation (p=0.0115) with the occurrence of post-ASCT relapse. ROC curve analysis investigating the predictive effect of the number of pathological PCs on disease relapse showed an area under the curve of 0,6978 (95% CI 0.5392-0.8564; p=0.0267). Neither BM residual PCs detectable on BM biopsies performed before apheresis (r=-0.1323; p=0.609) nor the type of mobilization scheme (p=0.707) had an impact on the proportion of clonal PCs in the graft. Additionally, we did not observe any statistically significant difference in progression free- (PFS) (p=0.8276) and overall survival (OS) (p=0.2475) between the HD-CTX and G-CSF+P groups. DISCUSSION PBSC mobilization has a succession rate > 85%. Despite the use of HD-CTX to increase PBSC yields and decrease tumor burden, there is not clear evidence of a superior mobilization strategy. Additionally, HD-CTX has a not negligible toxicity and approximately 10% of the pts require hospitalization. Conversely, G-CSF+P is a safe and effective approach also in poor mobilizers. In our study, we observed a significative difference in the apheresis yields (p=0.0489) and in the percentage of pts who achieved the threshold of 5x106 CD34+ cells/kgbw (p=0.006) in favor of HD-CTX. Additionally, the detection of harvested residual clonal PCs could be a promising strategy to recognise pts more likely to relapse after ASCT. Nonetheless, we failed to demonstrate a superior effect of HD-CTX in the clearance of harvested clonal PCs, in agreement with the absence of a different pts' outcome amongst the two mobilization strategies. In conclusion, the choice between the two regimens is challenging and requires careful consideration of multiple factors. Overall, young fit pts, especially in the high-risk setting, should be treated with all appropriate modalities including chemiomobilization followed by double-ASCT. Conversely, in pts candidate to a single-ASCT it is reasonable to use G-CSF+P, since HD-CTX does not improve PFS and OS and add toxicity. The absence of an in-vivo purging effect on apheresis products of chemiomobilization further strengthens a chemotherapy-free mobilization. Disclosures Galimberti: Roche: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4390-4390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhinav Deol ◽  
Judith Abrams ◽  
Ashiq Masood ◽  
Zaid Al-Kadhimi ◽  
Muneer H. Abidi ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4390 Background: Plerixafor is a CXCR 4 antagonist which is now approved for use for stem cell (SC) mobilization with granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF) in patients with non Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) or multiple myeloma (MM). Prior to the approval of plerixafor, we enrolled 49 patients in a compassionate use protocol at our institution to mobilize SC for patients who previously failed at least one mobilization attempt. Methods: Patients received 0.24 mg/kg of plerixafor subcutaneously 9 –11 hrs prior to apheresis in addition to twice daily GCSF. Results: Median age of the patients was 64 years (range, 23–74 years). NHL was the most common diagnosis in 27 (55%) patients, followed by MM with 17(35%) patients and HD with 5 (10%) patients. Thirty nine patients (80%) had been treated with more than 2 chemotherapeutic regimens prior to the first attempt at stem cell collection. Thirty seven patients (76%) failed one previous mobilization attempt, while 12 (24%) had failed 2 or more previous attempts. Using the combination of Plerixafor and GCSF we collected ≥ 2.5 × 106 CD34+ cells/Kg in 33 patients (67%). The median days for pheresis were 1 day with a range of 1 to 3 days. The median SC dose collected was 4 × 106 CD34+ cells/Kg, with a range 2.5 – 14.3. The median CD-34+ peripheral blood count on the 1st day of their collection with plerixafor was 22.4/uL. In contrast the median peripheral blood CD-34+ cell count in these patients on the day of their first collection which failed was 6.2 /uL. The median increase using G-CSF and plerixafor was 14.9 CD-34+ cells/uL. We collected ≥ 2.5 × 106 CD34+ cells/Kg on 4/5 (80%) patients with HD, 13/17 (76%) patients with MM and 16/27 (59%) patients with NHL. Sixteen patients (33%) collected < 2.5 × 106 CD34+ cells/Kg. The median cell dose collected in these patients was 1.4 × 106 CD34+ cells/Kg with a range, 0.4–2.2. The median number of days of pheresis was 2 days (range, 1–4 days). In these16 patients the median CD-34+ count on the day of their previous failed collection was11.2/uL. Their CD-34+ cell count on their first day of collection after the use of G-CSF and plerixafor was 8.3/ul. Figure 1 shows the change in peripheral CD34 counts with the prior mobilization attempt and after plerixafor mobilization, for 38 patients in whom data was available. The most common side effects attributed to plerixafor were diarrhea, fatigue, thrombocytopenia and bone pain; observed in 12%, 8%, 8% and 6% patients, respectively. Forty three of the 49 patients proceeded to an autologus peripheral blood SC transplant, 34 patients received ≥ 2.5 × 106 CD34+ cells/Kg. Thirty two of these patients used the plerixafor collection as the only source of SC. Two patients had their plerixafor mobilized SC combined with a previous suboptimal SC collection. Nine patients received < 2.5 × 106 CD34 + cells/Kg; 4 patients received plerixafor mobilized SC alone, 5 patients received plerixafor mobilized SC combined with their previously mobilized SC. The preparative regimens used were R- BEAM (20 patients), Melphalan (16 patients), BEAM (6 patients) and Etoposide+TBI (1 patient). All patients received GCSF from day +6 till WBC engraftment. The median days of WBC and platelet engraftment were day +11 (range, 9–13 days) and day +16 (range, 11–77 days), respectively. There was no significant difference in days to engraftment between the patients who collected greater or less than 2.5 × 106 CD34 + cells/Kg. With a median follow up 13.7 months, long term engraftment data is available on 27 patients. The median white cell count, hemoglobin and platelet count 1 year after transplant was 4.7 × 109/L, 12.2 g/dL and 109 ×109/L, respectively. There was no significant difference in counts at the 1 year mark between patients who collected more or less than 2.5 × 106 CD34 + cells/Kg. To date 15 patients have evidence of disease progression. Two patients have developed MDS/AML post transplant. Conclusion: Overall, plerixafor leads to mobilization of sufficient stem cells in a vast majority of patients who have failed previous mobilization attempts and allows more patients to proceed to an autologous SC transplant. Plerixafor is well tolerated with minimal side effects, acceptable time to engraftment and acceptable peripheral blood counts at 1 yr after the transplant. Our analysis suggests that failure to increase peripheral CD34 count after plerixafor when compared to previous attempts may predict unsuccessful mobilization. Disclosures: Lum: Transtarget Inc: Equity Ownership, Founder of Transtarget.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4051-4051
Author(s):  
Ahmed Y Abuabdou ◽  
Eric R Rosenbaum ◽  
Saad Usmani ◽  
Bart Barlogie ◽  
Michele Cottler-Fox

Abstract Abstract 4051 Introduction: What constitutes an acceptable mobilization regimen for collecting CD34+ cells depends on whether the goal of collection is to obtain a minimum number versus optimal number of cells. When treating patients with high-risk myeloma it may be important to obtain an optimal number. Here we compare retrospectively our earlier mobilization regimen, VTD-PACE, with MVTD-PACE in newly diagnosed, previously untreated multiple myeloma patients. Materials and Methods : We reviewed data for all patients who collected hematopoietic progenitor cells on Total Therapy protocols TT3a/TT3b with VTD-PACE (n=394) from February 2004 to September 2008 (138 females and 256 males, median age 59y; range 31–75), and on TT4/TT5 with MVTD-PACE (n=188) from August 2008 to May 2011 (78 females and 110 males, median age 61y, range 30–76). Based on their predicted first day collection with a large volume leukapheresis (30L processed), using our center's predictive formula (Blood 2010; 116(21):1182a), patients were stratified into 4 mobilizer types: poor (<2×106 CD34+ cells/kg), intermediate (≥2 to 10×106), good (>10 to 20×106) and excellent (>20×106). Variables examined included number of CD34+ cells/μl blood on day 1 and day 2 of collection (we have a minimum 2 day collection requirement), number of collection days to reach our minimum goal of 20×106 CD34+ cells/kg, and total CD34+ cells/kg collected for both chemotherapy groups. Variables for both groups stratified by mobilizer type were compared using two-tailed student's t-tests, except for the poor mobilizer group, where population size was too small for formal statistical analyses (VTD-PACE n=7, MVTD-PACE n=4), although averages were calculated. Results : There was no significant difference between VTD-PACE and MVTD-PACE for CD34+ cells/μl blood on day 1 of collection among the excellent [mean 368.9 (n=184) vs. 434.6 x106 (n=92); p-value 0.07], good [mean 138.6 (n=102) vs. 128.6 x106 (n=40); p-value 0.19], and intermediate [mean 60.1 (n=100) vs. 55.9 x106 (n=52); p-value 0.39] groups. A statistically significant difference between VTD-PACE and MVTD-PACE was found for CD34+ cells/μl blood on day 2 of collection for excellent mobilizers [mean 333.8 (n=184) vs. 460 ×106 (n=92); p-value <0.001], but not for the good [mean 165.7 (n=102) vs. 189.5×106 (n=40); p-value 0.21] and intermediate [mean 80.1 (n=101) vs. 102.3 ×106 (n=52); p-value 0.07] groups. When CD34+ cell/kg collection totals with VTD-PACE and MVTD-PACE were compared, a significant difference was seen for the intermediate mobilizer group only [mean 23.6 (n=101) vs. 26.3 ×106 (n=52); p-value 0.03]. For the poor mobilizer group, VTD-PACE had an average CD34+ cells/μl blood of 13.5×106 for day 1 of collection and 17.0 ×106 for day 2, with a total of 14.5×106 CD34+cells/kg collected; while MVTD-PACE had an average of 13.2×106 CD34+ cells/μl blood for day 1 of collection, 24.9×106 for day 2, with a total of 24.2×106CD34+ cells/kg collected. The number of collection days was similar between VTD-PACE and MVTD-PACE in the excellent mobilization group (2 days), but was slightly more for VTD-PACE compared to MVTD-PACE for the good (2.1 vs. 2 days), intermediate (3.2 vs. 2.9 days), and poor (6.1 vs. 5.8 days) groups. Conclusion : Both regimens allow more than minimum collections, but MVTD-PACE provides a higher peak number of CD34+ cells/μl blood, resulting in a slightly lower mean number of days of collection than VTD-PACE to reach an optimal collection. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2036-2036
Author(s):  
Suzanne C Gettys ◽  
Alison M Gulbis ◽  
Kaci Wilhelm ◽  
Yvonne T Dinh ◽  
Gabriela Rondon ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) is commonly carried out using growth factors alone. Approximately 10-15% of patients receive chemomobilization, which assists with cytoreduction and improving the cell yield; however, an optimal regimen has not been established. Here we report our experience with three chemomobilization regimens that have been used at our center: i) cyclophosphamide alone (Cy) ii) modified cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone (mCVAD) and iii) modified cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, doxorubicin, dexamethasone (mCBAD). Methods This is a single-center, retrospective chart review of patients with multiple myeloma undergoing mobilization for an auto-HCT with Cy, mCVAD, or mCBAD between January 1, 2006 and September 30, 2012. A total of 120 patients were identified as initiating stem cell mobilization with Cy (n=39), mCVAD (n=66) or mCBAD (n=15) for multiple myeloma within the defined time period. For the purpose of this study, we combined mCVAD and mCBAD into one group (n=81). The primary objective of this study is to compare successful mobilization and collection (≥ 2 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg collected) between high dose Cy (2-4 g/m2 x1) and mCVAD (cyclophosphamide 350 mg/m2 q12h x 4 days, vincristine 0.4mg continuous infusion daily x 4 days, doxorubicin 10 mg/ m2 continuous infusion daily x 4 days, dexamethasone 40 mg IV daily x 4 days) + mCBAD (same as previous, except using bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 bolus x 4 days instead of vincristine). Secondary objectives include optimal mobilization (≥ 4 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg), median number of leukapheresis sessions required, use of plerixafor, post-transplant time to neutrophil engraftment, disease status at day 100, time to progression, and incidence of febrile neutropenia, hospitalization, and ICU admissions with each mobilization regimen. Results The groups were well-matched with regard to demographic characteristics. [Table] All 120 achieved a successful mobilization (≥ 2 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg collected) and 118 achieved an optimal mobilization (≥ 4 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg collected). There was no significant difference in the number of leukapheresis sessions (median 2, range 1-7) or plerixafor use (20.5% Cy vs. 8.6% mCVAD or mCBAD, p=0.08). There was no significant difference in the incidence of febrile neutropenia (10.3% Cy vs. 12.4% mCVAD or mCBAD, p=1.00), hospital admissions (18% Cy vs. 21% mCVAD or mCBAD, p=0.81), or ICU admissions (0% Cy vs. 1.2% mCVAD or mCBAD, p=1.00) between the groups. All 14 patients who had an episode of febrile neutropenia were hospitalized. One patient in the mCVAD or mCBAD group was admitted to the ICU with sepsis and renal failure, but was eventually discharged. There were no mobilization-related deaths in either study group. There was no significant difference in the time to neutrophil engraftment for the two groups (median 11 days, range 9-13). The median time to progression was 11.8 months in the Cy group and 9.1 months in the mCVAD or mCBAD group. Conclusion Cy, mCVAD or mCBAD can be used for successful PBSC mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing an auto-HCT without any unexpected toxicity. These approaches may be further evaluated in a randomized, prospective trial. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Cyclophosphamide, mCVAD, and mCBAD will be discussed as mobilization regimens used for patients with multiple myeloma. Vincristine and doxorubicin do not have specific indications for use in multiple myeloma. Qazilbash:Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2186-2186
Author(s):  
Alissa Visram ◽  
Natasha Kekre ◽  
Christopher N. Bredeson ◽  
Jason Tay ◽  
Lothar B. Huebsch ◽  
...  

Abstract Background/Objective: Mobilized peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitor cells are the most common stem cell source for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT). Successful short-term stem cell engraftment requires collection of at least 2x106 CD34+ cells/kg. The American Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation (ASBMT) recommends a stem cell infusion target of 3-5 x106 cells/kg (Giralt et al. 2014). However, the number of CD34+ cells to reinfuse to ensure long-term engraftment has not been established. Plerixafor, a reversible CXCR4 antagonist, increases CD34+ cell yield at collection even in patients who are predicted poor mobilizers (PPM). Although plerixafor could be used universally for all collections, this may not be the most cost-effective strategy (Veltri et al. 2012). This study sought to determine the minimum number of CD34+ cells/kg required for adequate long-term hematopoiesis, identify factors associated with poor long-term hematopoiesis, and determine if plerixafor mobilization improved long-term peripheral blood counts. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who underwent auto-HSCT between January 2004 and September 2013 at The Ottawa Hospital, for management of hematological malignancies. Peripheral blood cell counts were collected from 1 to 5 years after auto-HSCT, or until disease relapse. Poor long-term hematopoiesis was defined as an ANC <1 x109/L, hemoglobin <100 g/L, or platelets <100 x109/L. Patients were stratified into groups based on the infused CD34+ concentration (in cells/kg), and the proportion of patients with poor long-term hematopoiesis at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post auto-HSCT was compared with chi square tests. Long-term clinical outcomes (platelet and packed red blood cell transfusions, and post auto-HSCT infection rates) were compared between plerixafor-mobilized patients and PPM (defined as patients with pre-collection CD34+ <2 x 106 cells/kg) with standard mobilization regimens. Results: This study included 560 patients who underwent auto-HSCT, 210 with multiple myeloma and 350 with lymphoma. At 1 and 5 years post auto-HSCT 377 and 104 patients were included, respectively. A dose dependent improvement 1 year after auto-HSCT was seen in patients who received 0-2.99 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg (24.4%, n= 41) compared to patients who received 5-9.99 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg (11%, n=154, p=0.051) and ³10 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg (4.5%, n=66, p=0.006). Though there was a trend towards lower CD34+ infusions and poorer hematopoietic function (see table 1), there was no statistically significant difference in hematopoietic function based on CD34+ infusion concentrations after 1 year post auto-HSCT. 10 patients received <2 x106 CD34+ cells/kg, of whom the rate of inadequate hematopoiesis was 33% at 1 year (n=6) and 0% (n=1) at 5 years post auto-HSCT. Factors that increased the risk of poor hematopoiesis over the course of study follow up, based on a univariate analysis, included advanced age (OR 1.189, p=0.05), multiple prior collections (OR 2.978, p=0.035), and prior treatment with more than two chemotherapy lines (OR 2.571, p=0.02). Plerixafor-mobilized patients (n=25), compared to PPM (n=197), had a significantly higher median CD34+ cell collection (4.048 x109/L and 2.996 x109/L cells/kg, respectively, p=0.005). There was no significant difference in overall cytopenias, transfusion requirements, or infection rates between plerixafor-mobilized and PPM patients over the course of the study follow up. Conclusion: Low pre-collection CD34+ counts, advanced age, multiple prior collections, and more than two prior chemotherapy treatments adversely affected long-term hematopoiesis post auto-HSCT. We support the transfusion target of 3-5 x 106 cells/kg, as proposed by the ASBMT, given that at 5 years post auto-HSCT there was no statistical or clinically significant difference in hematopoietic function with higher CD34+ infusion targets. While mobilization with plerixafor significantly increased overall CD34+ cell collection when compared with PPM, long-term hematopoietic function and clinical outcomes were not different. This finding supports the practise of limiting plerixafor use only to patients who are PPM, thereby facilitating adequate stem cell collection and early engraftment, as opposed to universal plerixafor mobilization. Disclosures Sabloff: Lundbeck: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Research Funding; Alexion: Honoraria.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 0480
Author(s):  
Seyyed Amir Yasin Ahmadi ◽  
Mandana Beigi Boroujeni ◽  
Naser Pajouhi ◽  
Amin Hasanvand ◽  
Afshin Hasanvand ◽  
...  

There are many animal models for polycystic ovary (PCO); using exogenous testosterone enanthate is one of the methods of induction of these models. However, induction of insulin resistance should also be studied in the modeling technics. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate the expression of insulin receptor substrate (Irs)-2 mRNA in the liver tissue of rat PCO model. Nineteen Wistar rats were divided into three groups; (1) PCO modeling group (N =7) received daily 1.0 mg/100g testosterone enanthate solved in olive oil along with free access dextrose water 5%, (2) vehicle group (N =6), which handled like the PCO group, but did not receive testosterone enanthate, (3) control group (N =6) with standard care. All the animals were administered via intra-peritoneal injection for 14 days. Expression of Irs-2 mRNA was studied with real-time PCR and fold changes (FC) were reported. The average of expression in the control group was considered as the calibrator. About 13.4% expression reduction was found in the PCO group (FC =0.874, P-value =0.043). No significant reduction was found in the vehicle group (FC =0.951, P-value =0.076). However, analysis of variance did not show a significant difference between all the groups of study (P-value =0.085). The present model of PCO might induce insulin resistance at liver level with a low effect size via reduction in the mRNA expression of Irs-2. Study of the involved genes and molecules in other tissues of PCO animal models is suggested.


JBMTCT ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. p94
Author(s):  
Patricia Elkiki dos Santos

Abstract Objective: The success of autologus hematopoietic stem cell transplantation relies on CD34+ cells' availability in peripheral blood (PB),  which is affected by several factors as age, sex, type of the disease, treatments, and others. In that regard, this prospective study aimed to evaluate the influence of these factors, correlating them with the pre-apheresis CD34+ cell count. Method: Before autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, CD34+ cells were quantified in the pre-apheresis PB and the final product. Then, after the determination of minimum CD34+ value, clinical and laboratory parameters were compared between patients with higher and lower CD34+ cells count. Results: Out of the 34 patients, 29 presented more than 20,000 leukocytes/μl. Patients who failed in the mobilization presented <20,000 leukocytes/μl. There was a significant difference between the groups with different pre-apheresis CD34+ cells status regarding age (p=0.025), leukocyte count (p<0.001) and mononuclear cells (p=0.001) in PB. In addition, the pre-apheresis CD34+ ≥14 cells/μl group was related to a better yield of these cells in the final product and with the requirement of a single collection to obtain the minimum yield, of 2x106 CD34+/kg. Conclusion: This study demonstrates age and leukocyte count relate to CD34+ count in PB, and that CD34+ cells yield in the collection, can be predicted by  CD34+ cells frequency in PB.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S776-S777
Author(s):  
Angelico Mendy ◽  
Kitty Tierney ◽  
Tara Mink ◽  
Walaa Hussein ◽  
Peter Monaco ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Length of stay is not only an indicator of how successful a hospitalized patient’s treatment and recovery is, but is also an indicator of fiscal costs to the hospital. Hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) patients typically experience extended hospital admissions that can vary significantly patient to patient with hospital discharge dependent upon a recovered white blood cell count. Recent literature suggests a gut microbial influence on hematopoiesis. We sought to explore potential associations between gut microbiome diversity and the length of stay in patients undergoing HSCT in the inpatient setting. Methods Within two healthcare systems, we identified patients who would receive conditioning chemotherapy and subsequent HSCT in the inpatient setting. Pre-chemotherapy stool was collected, sequenced with shotgun metagenomics, and analyzed for gut microbial diversity using Inverse-Simpson index. The length of admission or length of stay during their transplant process was recorded. We assessed whether there was an association with gut microbial diversity and length of stay. Results 24 patients we evaluated for diversity and length of stay. There was no significant correlation between age or gender and length of stay. Significant difference in length of stay was seen between allogenic vs autogenic transplants (p value ≤0.01). Within the 24 patients, lengths of stay ranged from 8 to 36 days with a mean average of 20.9 days. Gut diversity ranged from 1.8 to 23.9. An overall negative association between length of stay and diversity was seen, though this was determined not statistically significant (p value 0.09). Length of Stay correlation with pre-chemotherapy Gut Microbiome diversity Conclusion Our study showed no significant association between gut microbial diversity and inpatient length of stay during HSCT. Overall, a trend towards increased length of stay in patients with decreased diversity was noted. Additional studies of greater participant size are necessary to confirm or further study these findings. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document