Patterns Of Non-Hematological Adverse Effects In Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia In Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Treated With Ponatinib – Experience At a Single Institution

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4019-4019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Preetesh Jain ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Carlos Guillermo Romo ◽  
Alfonso Quintas-Cardama ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Qtc Prolongation ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
Dry Skin ◽  
Starting Dose ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction Ponatinib is a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) efficacious in pts with refractory CML. Ponatinib inhibits other tyrosine kinases (e.g. RET, FGFR, FLT3) that may lead to off target adverse effects (AE). We report a single-institution experience of frequencies of non-hematological AE among pts on therapy with ponatinib. Methods A total of 90 pts with CML-CP[49 relapsed refractory (RR), 41 frontline] treated at our institution on clinical trials with ponatinib were analyzed. AE were recorded on each pt visit and charts were reviewed for AE and risk factors. Results For RR pts (n=49)the starting dose of ponatinib was 45 mg in 42 (86%) pts. 39 (80%) had dose interruptions, due in 17 (44%) to grade 3 thrombocytopenia and in 22 (56%) to non-hematological AE (elevated pancreatic enzymes 7 pts of whom 5 had pancreatitis; body aches and headache 7; hypertension 7; skin toxicity 5; fatigue 5). 35 pts (71%) had dose reduction to 30 or 15 mg. Hypertension (H.T.) stage 2 (≥160/100 mm Hg) occurred in 15 (31%) pts; only 2 of new onset. Blood pressure was controlled in all with antihypertensives. Other cardiovascular AE included QTc prolongation in 1 pt, atrial fibrillation in 1 pt, acute myocardial infarction in 3, venous thrombosis in 3, arterial thrombosis in 4, transient ischemic attack (TIA) in 1 and Raynaud’s in 1. No pt discontinued ponatinib due to cardiovascular AE’s. Symptomatic pancreatitis developed in 8 pts (16%). Grade 3/4 elevations in serum lipase and amylase occurred in 12 (24%) pts and 2 (4%) pts respectively. Median days to onset of pancreatitis was 24 (range 7-456). 27 pts (55%) developed cutaneous toxicity including xerosis/dry skin in 10 (37%) and grade 3 erythroderma and exfoliation of the skin in 5. Four pts died, none related to ponatinib. 13 pts went off the study: 5 went to SCT, 3 progressed, 1 pt died in CCyR of multiple co-morbidities, 1 pt had progressive melanoma, 1 pt was transferred to another hospital, and 2 for ponatinib-related AE (headache in 1 and headache, fatigue, depression, and abdominal pain in 1). For pts in frontline setting (n=41) the starting dose was 45 mg in all. 29 pts (71%) had dose interruptions due to one or more of the following: grade 3/4 pancreatic enzyme elevation in 16, myelosuppression in 4, and various non-hematological AE in 15 (skin toxicity in 4, fatigue in 2, headache in 1, chest pain in 2, elevated liver enzymes in 2, suspected seizure vs. TIA in 1, grade 3 diarrhea in 1, memory disturbances in 1, and grade 3 hypertension in 1, erectile dysfunction in 1). 24 pts (59%) had dose reduction, from 45 mg to 30 mg in 20 pts and then to 15 mg in 4 pts. H.T. stage 2 occurred in 3 (7%) pts usually among patients with pre-existing H.T. Other cardiovascular AE included grade 2 QTc prolongation in 1 pt, possible TIA vs. possible seizure in 1, and Raynaud’s in 2. Pancreatitis was seen in 12 pts (29%) with grade 1-2 and 6 pts (15%) with grade 3/4. Grade 3/4 lipase/amylase elevations occurred in 16 (39%) and 3 (7%) pts. Median days to the onset of pancreatitis were 6 (4-22). 34 pts (83%) developed skin toxicity with rash (any grade) in 25 pts (61%), xerosis/dry skin in 18 pts (44%) and grade 3 erythroderma and skin exfoliation in 2 (pts may have had ≥1 type of skin AE). 2 pts discontinued therapy, due to severe xerosis in 1 and recurrent gra 4 neutropenia in another. 1 pt developed grade 2 pericarditis possibly related to ponatinib. For all the 90 pts, risk factors for cardiovascular and pancreatic toxicities included 20 (22%) smokers, 2 heavy alcohol consumers, 27 (30%) obese (BMI ≥30 Kg/m2), 30 (33%) with hypertriglyceridemia, 17 (19%) had hypercholesterolemia and 10 pts were receiving lipid lowering therapies. Conclusions Ponatinib is generally well tolerated and AEs can usually be properly managed. AE are more common in RR pts with greater frequency of hypertension, cardiovascular complications, headache, dry mouth and dose interruptions. Most pts are able to continue therapy after dose adjustments. Disclosures: Kantarjian: ARIAD: Research Funding. Cortes:Ariad, Pfizer, Teva: Consultancy; Ariad, BMS, Novartis, Pfizer, Teva: Research Funding.

Pralatrexate Is Active in Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL): Results of a Multicenter, Dose-Finding Trial.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 919-919
Author(s):  
Steven M. Horwitz ◽  
Madeleine Duvic ◽  
Youn Kim ◽  
Jasmine M Zain ◽  
Mary Jo Lechowicz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Optimal Dose ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 919 Background: Pralatrexate enters cancer cells via the reduced folate carrier-1 (RFC-1) and is efficiently polyglutamated by folylpolyglutamyl synthetase (FPGS), leading to high intracellular retention. In a Phase 1/2 study of patients with hematologic malignancies, pralatrexate demonstrated activity in aggressive T-cell lymphoma with a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 30 mg/m2 once weekly for 6 of 7 weeks. The generally indolent course of CTCL may be better treated at lower doses in a maintenance fashion if a lower incidence and severity of adverse events can be achieved while preserving activity. PDX-010 is an open-label, single-agent, multicenter, Phase 1 dose-reduction trial in patients with relapsed or refractory CTCL. The primary objective is to identify an optimal dose and schedule of pralatrexate for these patients. Methods: Eligibility included mycosis fungoides (MF), Sézary syndrome (SS), and primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL); with disease progression after at least 1 prior systemic therapy. The pralatrexate dose and schedule started at 30 mg/m2 by IV push on 3 of 4 weeks and subsequent cohorts received reduced doses (20, 15, 10 mg/m2) and/or schedules (3/4 or 2/3 weeks) of pralatrexate based on tolerability. All patients received supplementation with vitamin B12 1 mg intramuscularly every 8-10 weeks and folic acid 1 mg orally once daily. As we sought a well tolerated regimen the definition of DLTs to trigger dose reduction included toxicities such as grade ≥ 3 neutropenia, grade ≥ 2 thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, grade ≥ 2 mucositis/stomatitis, and any toxicity leading to dose omission or reduction in cycle 1. If DLT occurred and a response was seen, the following cohort was opened at the next lower dose or next less frequent schedule. Response was evaluated by modified severity-weighted adjustment tool (SWAT) every 2 cycles for 6 months and then every 4 cycles. For patients with lymph node involvement, scans were completed at baseline and upon clinical response or end of treatment, whichever occurred first. Results: Thirty-one patients received pralatrexate, with 18 (58%) men and median age of 57 yrs (range, 30-81). Patients had received a median of 6 prior therapies (range, 1-25). Cohorts at the following doses/schedules were enrolled: 30 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks (n=2), 20 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks (n=3), 20 mg/m2 x 2/3 weeks (n=7), 15 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks (n=6), 15 mg/m2 x 2/3 weeks (n=3), and 10 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks (n=10). Patients received pralatrexate for a median of 72 days (range, 7-491+); 4 patients received >10 cycles of treatment. The most common treatment-related adverse events (all grades) were mucositis (18 patients [58%]), nausea (14 patients [45%]), fatigue (14 patients [45%]), pyrexia (7 patients [23%]), vomiting (6 patients [19%]), anemia (6 patients [19%]), and edema (5 patients [16%]). Grade 3-4 treatment-related toxicities in >1 patient each were mucositis (4 patients [13%]) and anemia (2 patients [6%]). Mucositis was dose limiting (≥ grade 2) in 8 patients (26%). A total of 11 responses were observed, including 2 complete responses and 9 partial responses. In the 18 patients who received pralatrexate at a dose intensity of 15 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks or greater, the objective response rate was 56% (10/18 patients). This appeared to be the threshold dose for substantial activity in CTCL, below which the incidence of responses decreased in this dose de-escalation trial. Conclusion: Pralatrexate shows impressive activity in the treatment of relapsed CTCL. The optimal dose and schedule that provided activity with tolerability for CTCL was determined to be pralatrexate 15 mg/m2 weekly on 3 of 4 weeks. This cohort is being expanded to better assess efficacy and durability. Disclosures: Horwitz: Allos Therapeutics, Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding. Duvic:Allos Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding. Lechowicz:Allos Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy. Fruchtman:Allos Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment.

A Randomized Phase III Trial of ABVD Vs. Stanford V +/− Radiation Therapy In Locally Extensive and Advanced Stage Hodgkin's Lymphoma: An Intergroup Study Coordinated by the Eastern Cooperatve Oncology Group (E2496)

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 415-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leo I Gordon ◽  
Fanxing Hong ◽  
Richard I Fisher ◽  
Nancy L. Bartlett ◽  
Joseph M. Connors ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Sensory Neuropathy ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ann Arbor ◽  
Intergroup Trial ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Splenic Disease

Abstract Abstract 415 Background: The ability to cure patients (pts) with advanced Hodgkin's Lymphoma (HL) with combination chemotherapy (CC) (MOPP and variants, ABVD and variants) represented a major milestone in oncology research, and CC became a paradigm for other malignancies. Further, the rationale for combined modality therapy (CMT) (radiation (RT) and CC) in HL evolved based on the high frequency of relapse in initially involved sites. As response rates and survival improved, newer treatments such as the combined modality Stanford V regimen were developed to shorten the duration of chemotherapy, add RT to sites of disease and reduce toxicity while maintaining or improving the cure rate. Indeed, the Stanford V regimen was tested and validated in a Phase II co-operative group trial (E1492) (J Clin Oncol 2000; 18:972). In order to investigate this approach against “standard” therapy, we conducted a randomized Phase III Intergroup trial of ABVD vs. the Stanford V regimen for patients with locally extensive or advanced HL. Objectives: The trial was designed to detect a 33% reduction in the failure free survival (FFS) hazard rate with Stanford V compared with ABVD, which corresponds to a difference in five-year FFS of 64% vs. 74%. Method: Patients with locally extensive (defined as clinical Ann Arbor Stage I-IIA/B and bulky mediastinal disease (BMD) (mass > 1/3 maximum intrathoracic diameter on standing postero-anterior chest x-ray or >/−10 cm on computerized tomography) or advanced (Ann Arbor Stage III or IV) HL were randomized to receive either ABVD × 6–8 cycles (C) (51% had 6 C, 35% had 8 C, 14% had <6 C) + 36 Gy (only in pts with BMD) or Stanford V × 12 weeks (95% had 12 weeks) + 36 Gy (for sites >5cm or for macroscopic splenic disease). The log-rank test was used to compare FFS for all eligible patients stratified on extent of disease (locally extensive vs. advanced), and number of International Prognostic Factor Project (IPFP) risk factors (0–2 vs. 3–7). An extended Cox model was also used to address non-proportional hazard between the two arms. Results: 854 pts enrolled from April, 1999 to June, 2006 and 812 were eligible for analysis. 404 pts were randomized to ABVD and 408 to Stanford V. Median age was 33 yrs in both arms (range 16–83). 53% were men and 47% women; 4% had Stage I, 31% had Stage II, 39% had Stage III and 25% had Stage IV disease by Ann Arbor criteria. 35% of pts on ABVD and 35% on Stanford V had BMD. Three % of pts had nodular lymphocyte predominant HL, 77% of pts had nodular sclerosis HL, 14% had mixed cell HL. Age, stage, pathology and risk factors (0–2 vs. 3–7) were similar in both arms. In total, 65% were IPFP score 0–2 and 33% were 3–6. Response rate. There was no difference in response rates (RR) between the two arms (ABVD=72% CR+ CCR, 7.7% PR, 7.9% SD; Stanford V= 69 % CR +CCR, 7% PR and 10 % SD. 8% were not evaluable for response on ABVD and 9% on Stanford V. Toxicity was similar in both groups. The most frequent Grade 3 + 4 toxicity was neutropenia, and was similar between the 2 groups (76% Grade 3 + 4 in ABVD and 70% Grade 3+ 4 in Stanford V). Grade 5 toxicity was <1% in both groups. There was, however, more Grade 3 lymphopenia in Stanford V (78% vs. 42%, p< 0.0001) and more Grade 3 +4 sensory neuropathy in Stanford V (10%) than in ABVD (3%) (p< 0.0001). A total of 26 second primary cancers developed, 12 after ABVD and 14 after Stanford V (p=NS). FFS and OS. For 812 eligible patients, with a median follow up of 5.25 years, 5-year FFS was 73% for ABVD and 71% for Stanford V (p=0.29 by log rank) (Figure left); 5-year OS was 88% for ABVD and 87% for Stanford V (p=0.87 by log-rank, HR=0.97, 95% CI: 0.65 to 1.44) (Figure right) indicating no significant difference in either FFS or OS between the 2 arms. Conclusion: In the largest Phase III intergroup trial of HL in North America, there was no significant difference in RR, FFS, OS, and 5-year toxicity when ABVD (+ RT for BMD) is compared with Stanford V (+RT for nodal sites >5 cm and macroscopic splenic disease). There was more Grade 3 lymphopenia (p< 0.0001) and more Grade 3 + 4 sensory neuropathy (p< 0.0001) on Stanford V. Thus ABVD (plus RT for BMD) remains the standard of care because Stanford V did not meet the objective of 33% improvement in FFS. For some patients, Stanford V, when given as described with RT, remains an acceptable alternative. Disclosures: Friedberg: Genentech: Honoraria. Blum:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Horning:Genentech: Employment.

Updated Interim Results of the Safety and Efficacy of Different Lenalidomide Starting Dose Regimens in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory (rel/ref) Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) (CC-5013-CLL-009 Study)

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3925-3925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clemens Wendtner ◽  
Michael Hallek ◽  
Graeme Fraser ◽  
Anne-Sophie Michallet ◽  
Peter Hillmen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Starting Dose ◽  
Purine Analog ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Abstract 3925 Introduction: CLL patients (pts) who relapse following purine-analog or bendamustine-based treatments have a poor prognosis. These pts have limited therapeutic options and novel agents with alternative mechanisms of action are needed. Several phase 1 and 2 trials in rel/ref CLL showed promising activity with escalating dose regimens of lenalidomide (LEN). In other phase II studies improved clinical responses to lenalidomide appeared to correlate with dose levels > 5mg/day. This phase 2 trial investigates the safety of LEN initiated at 3 different starting doses followed by a step-wise dose escalation as tolerated in rel/ref CLL. Methods: In this ongoing trial, eligible pts with rel/ref CLL who have received ≥ 1 prior treatment regimen containing purine-analog or bendamustine are being enrolled. The objectives of this study are to evaluate primarily the safety and secondarily the efficacy of different LEN dose regimens. Pts are randomized 1:1:1 to receive a double-blinded starting dose of 5 mg, 10 mg, or 15 mg oral LEN on days 1–28 of each 28-day cycle. In all 3 treatment arms, the dose is escalated by 5 mg increments every 28 days to reach a maximum dose of 25 mg/d, depending on tolerability. In instances of poor tolerability, dose reductions also occur in 5 mg steps. Pts are stratified by relapsed versus refractory status to their last purine-analog or bendamustine-based treatment regimen and according to age (< 65 vs ≥ 65 years). Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) prophylaxis comprises of oral hydration and allopurinol 300 mg/day and is initiated ≥ 3 days prior to starting study drug and for a minimum of the first 3 treatment cycles. A total of 105 pts are planned for enrollment to the study. Per protocol, unblinded interim analyses were conducted by the independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) after 18 subjects completed 1 cycle and continue at 13-week intervals. Results: To date, 95 pts are enrolled at a median age of 64 years (range 32–81). Enrolled pts are primarily male (67%) and Caucasian (92%). Cytogenetic data are available for 73 pts; 21% have del(17p), 55% have del(13q), 25% have del(11q), and of 72 patients evaluable for trisomy 12, 11 patients (15%) tested positive. IGVH is unmutated in 77% of 77 evaluable pts and 44% of 84 evaluable pts are ZAP70-positive. Based on the Binet and Rai staging systems 9 (10%), 25 (26%) and 24 (25%) of subjects are stage A, B and C, respectively; 7 (7%), 12 (13%) and 16 (17%) subjects are low, intermediate or high-risk disease, respectively. For 2 (2%) subjects the Binet/Rai staging is currently unknown. Overall, 19 pts (20%) received prior bendamustine-containing treatment and 71 pts (75%) received prior fludarabine-based treatment. The median number of prior therapies was 3 (range 1–10). Most common hematological grade ≥ 3 AEs include neutropenia (62%) and thrombocytopenia (34%). At baseline, 19% of pts presented with grade 1–2 neutropenia. The most common non-hematological ≥ grade 3 AEs include pneumonia (13%), tumor flare (13%), and fatigue (11%). TLS was reported in 3 pts (3%): grade 1, 3, and 4. In total, 8 grade 5 events were reported, 3 of which were suspected to be related to LEN: 2 cases of pneumonia and 1 death for unknown cause. At the time of the cut-off, 59 pts (62%) have discontinued treatment. Most common reasons for treatment discontinuation include disease progression (n = 20) and AEs (n = 20). To date, 47 pts (49%) have dose escalated above their starting dose levels of which 12 patients escalated to the highest dose level (25 mg daily). 18 subjects have had no dose level reduction or escalations and 1 patient is still in the first cycle of the study. Average duration of treatment is 6.5 cycles, and median number of cycles is 4. Efficacy evaluations are completed monthly after 3 months of study drug treatment. At time of the data reporting, 5 pts were on study drug but did not reach the first assessment at cycle. For the 90 pts evaluable for response, the investigator's assessment indicates 2 pts (2%) reached CR, 36 (40%) achieved PR, 33 (37%) patients had SD, and 19 (21%) pts progressed. Conclusion: The independent DMC, as of 14 June, 2012 (N=95), recommended that accrual into all three treatment arms should continue as planned, suggesting all three starting doses were well tolerated. To date, the ORR is 42% and 49% of pts were dose escalated at least once. In this rel/ref CLL population LEN appears active, and completion of accrual will clarify the appropriate dose at which to initiate therapy. Disclosures: Wendtner: Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: use of lenalidomie in relapsed/refractory CLL. Hallek:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hillmen:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria. Gregory:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Stilgenbauer:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Kipps:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Purse:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhang:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mei:Celgene Corporation: Employment.

A Randomised Dose De-Escalation Safety Study of Oral Fludarabine, ±Oral Cyclophosphamide and Intravenous Rituximab (OFOCIR) As First-Line Therapy of Fit Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia (CLL) Aged ≥65 Years – End of Recruitment Analysis of Response and Toxicity of the Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG) and CLL Australian Research Consortium (CLLARC) CLL5 Study

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 436-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen P Mulligan ◽  
Devinder S Gill ◽  
Paul Turner ◽  
William E. P. Renwick ◽  
Rosemary Harrup ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Therapy Response ◽  
Patient Choice ◽  
First Line ◽  
Patient Cohort ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 436 Background: Combination immunochemotherapy with fludarabine (F), cyclophosphamide (C) and rituximab (R) gave superior progression free and overall survival compared to FC in the CLL8 Study. The median age in CLL8 was 61 years compared to a median age for overall CLL patients of 72 years. There is ongoing debate regarding the tolerability and safety of FCR in elderly patients, and what are the most appropriate criteria for selection of therapy. Methods: Previously untreated patients with progressive CLL aged ≥65 were randomised to one of three treatment regimens FR5, FCR3 and FCR5 as follows: (i) F 24mg/m2 po D1-5 + R (375 mg/m2 C1, 500mg/m2 C2-6) iv D1 (FR5), (ii) F 24mg/m2 po and C 150mg/m2 po D1-3 + R iv D1 (FCR3) or (iii) F 24mg/m2 po + C 150mg/m2po D1-5 + R iv D1 (FCR5), all given at 4 weekly intervals for an intended 6 cycles. The dosage of FCR5 is equivalent to standard 3 day IV FCR in the CLL8 Study. Patients were administered their therapy arm with no dose reduction but fludarabine dose was reduced if the eGFR was 50–69ml/min. Therapy was delayed up to 2 weeks if there was grade 3 or 4 toxicity, and if unresolved after 2 weeks, patients were taken off study. If toxicity resolved to grade 2 or less, therapy proceeded. Results: Recruitment of all 120 randomised patients was completed in July 2012. An analysis was performed with a cut-off date of 5 May, 2012 at which time there were 117 of 120 recruited from 29 centres in Australia and New Zealand. Median age was 71.7 (range 65–83) years. Binet stage at registration was progressive A – 20 (17.1%), B – 55 (47.0%) and C – 42 (35.9%). Response data are shown in table 1 for the total patient cohort - no analysis has been performed to date by treatment arm. Analysis of grade 3 and 4 toxicity events by Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) score and age are shown in Tables 2 and 3 with data available at the cut-off date. Conclusions: Oral F(C)R therapy appears generally safe and well tolerated in CLL patients aged ≥65 years requiring first-line treatment according to data available at end of recruitment. Using stringent stopping criteria with delay of 2 weeks for recovery of grade 3 or 4 toxicity but no dose reduction, ∼40% of patients stop early due to toxicity, intercurrent illness or patient choice. Based on the 66 patients with completed Final Pathological Staging 2 months after end of therapy, response rates appear high with an overall response rate (ORR) of 92.3%. For this relatively fit elderly patient cohort, neither a CIRS score of 0 to 6, nor age predicted for grade 3 and 4 toxicity. Disclosures: Mulligan: Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Ruxolitinib in a Multicenter, Open-Label, Expanded-Access Study in Japanese Patients with Myelofibrosis (MF)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1625-1625
Author(s):  
Keita Kirito ◽  
Norio Komatsu ◽  
Kazuya Shimoda ◽  
Hikaru Okada ◽  
Taro Amagasaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Spleen Size ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Spleen Volume ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Starting Dose ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Eortc Qlq

Abstract BACKGROUND: Ruxolitinib is a potent and selective JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor that has demonstrated durable improvements in splenomegaly and MF-related symptoms, and has been associated with improved overall survival in patients (pts) with MF in randomized clinical trials. Results from the phase 2 Asian multinational study (NCT01392443) supported these findings in Asian pts, including 30 Japanese pts. The current study was initiated to collect further data on the safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib in pts with MF and included intermediate (Int)-1-risk pts and those with a platelet (PLT) count of 50 to < 100 × 109/L, 2 pt populations not included in the phase 3 COMFORT studies or the phase 2 Asian study. METHODS: Pts with primary MF (PMF), post-polycythemia vera (PPV) MF, or post-essential thrombocythemia (PET) MF classified as high-risk, Int-2 risk, or Int-1 risk with a palpable spleen (≥ 5 cm from costal margin) were included. The primary objective was to assess safety of ruxolitinib. Efficacy endpoints included changes in spleen size and patient-reported outcomes (EORTC QLQ-C30 symptoms and functional scales and the 7-day modified MFSAF v2.0). All pts were to receive ruxolitinib for 24 wk with the starting dose based on PLT count at baseline (50 to ˂ 100 × 109/L, 5 mg twice daily [bid]; 100 to 200 × 109/L, 15 mg bid; ˃ 200 × 109/L, 20 mg bid) and adjusted for each pt to maximize safety and efficacy (minimum, 5 mg bid; maximum, 25 mg bid). The primary analysis occurred when all pts completed 24 wk or discontinued. RESULTS: Overall, 51 pts (PMF, n = 23; PPV-MF, n = 14; PET-MF, n = 14) were treated. Most pts were Int-2 (33.3%) or high risk (54.9%); 11.8% were classified as Int-1. The median age was 65 years (range, 44-85 years), and 52.9% (n = 27) were male. The median palpable spleen length was 16.5 cm (range, 2-30 cm), and the median spleen volume was 2028.7 cm3 (range, 480-4682 cm3). Median hemoglobin at baseline was 99.0 g/L (range, 62-141 g/L), and median PLT count was 247 × 109/L (range, 57-1265 × 109/L); 13.7% of pts had a baseline PLT count of 50 to < 100 × 109/L. Most pts received a starting dose of 20 mg bid (62.7%; n = 32) or 15 mg bid (23.5%; n = 12); the rest started treatment at 5 mg bid. Most pts completed treatment as per protocol (86.3%; n = 44); 9.8% (n = 5) discontinued due to adverse events (AEs). Other reasons for discontinuation included disease progression and loss to follow-up (2.0% each). The most common hematologic AEs were anemia (62.7%; grade 3/4, 47.1%) and thrombocytopenia (29.4%; grade 3/4, 7.8%). Nonhematologic AEs in ≥ 10% of pts included constipation (13.7%; grade 3/4, 0%), abnormal hepatic function (11.8%; grade 3/4, 3.9%), and nasopharyngitis (11.8%; grade 3/4, 0%). No deaths occurred on study. At wk 24, 30.0% of evaluable pts (15/50) experienced ≥ 50% reduction in palpable spleen length from baseline; 26.0% (13/50) had a ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume. The majority of pts (52.0%; 26/50) had a ≥ 50% reduction in palpable spleen length from baseline at any time by wk 24; 38.0% (19/50) had a ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume by wk 24. Ruxolitinib treatment led to clinically significant improvements in symptoms, with 75.0% of evaluable pts (30/40) achieving a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in MFSAF total symptom score at wk 24. Improvements were also observed in quality of life and role functioning (as assessed by the EORTC-QLQ), with pts reporting reductions in MF-related symptoms, including fatigue, pain, and appetite loss. Overall, IgM, CD3, CD4, and CD8 levels remained stable during treatment; IgG levels decreased slightly in the first 4 wk but then increased to near baseline levels (Figure). CONCLUSIONS: As observed in other studies of ruxolitinib, most pts in this study experienced spleen size reductions and improvement in symptoms. The most common AEs were anemia and thrombocytopenia, consistent with previous reports. Additionally, this study evaluated the effect of ruxolitinib on the levels of different immune markers, an analysis not conducted in previous studies with ruxolitinib, and identified no negative effects on the levels of these markers during the course of treatment. The safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib here is consistent with the phase 3 COMFORT studies and the phase 2 Asian study. These findings indicate that ruxolitinib is a safe and effective therapy in Japanese pts with MF, including Int-1-risk pts and those with PLT counts 50 to < 100 × 109/L. Disclosures Kirito: Novartis Pharma KK: Honoraria. Shimoda:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Okada:Novartis Pharma K.K.: Employment. Amagasaki:Novartis Pharma K.K.: Employment. Yonezu:Novartis Pharma K.K.: Employment. Akashi:Asahi Kasei: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Shionogi: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Chugai: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharma K.K.: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Combination of pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and bevacizumab (B) (PLD-B) in sarcoma (SAR)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 20506-20506
Author(s):  
K. M. Skubitz ◽  
P. A. Haddad
Keyword(s):  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Symptomatic Improvement ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Toxicity Profile ◽  
Median Dose ◽  
Starting Dose ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

20506 Background: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays an important role in many tumors including SAR. Because of the known efficacy of PLD in SAR and the presumed importance of VEGF in SAR, we have treated SAR patients with PLD-B. It is possible that the addition of B to PLD might alter the toxicity profile. The toxicities of this combination are not well described. Methods: To better define the toxicity of the combination of PLD-B in SAR, we reviewed our experience with PLD-B in patients treated between 2004 and 2006. Results: We identified 20 patients with SAR treated with PLD-B at our institution. There were 9 men and 11 women, with a median age of 47.5 years (range 23–77). Ten patients initiated therapy with PLD q28 days at a median dose of 45 mg/m2 (range 45–50), and 10 q14 days at a median dose of 21.2 mg/m2 (range 20–25), in combination with B at 5 mg/kg q14 days. A median of 5 cycles was given (range 1–15). Dose delay was required in 3 patients for the second cycle, and dose reduction was required in 9 patients by cycle 3. Of the 10 patients starting with monthly PLD, 7 were changed to q14 day PLD by cycle 4. Mucositis and skin toxicity were the dose limiting toxicities (DLT) in 14/20 patients, and myelosuppression was the DLT in 1/20 patients. Nine patients were felt to have clinical benefit; 3 had a PR and 6 had SD. Notably, 2/4 recurrent Ewing sarcoma patients had symptomatic improvement and at least SD for 10 and 11 months, respectively, with minor toxicity allowing a good quality of life. Conclusions: This report describes the toxicity profile of PLD-B in 20 patients with SAR. The toxicities observed were similar to those seen with PLD alone, however, these toxicities appeared more pronounced with the addition of B. Since VEGF is important for wound healing, the known effects of B on this process may contribute to more skin and mucosal toxicity of PLD at a given dose. Future studies of PLD-B should consider the potential of increased mucosal and skin toxicity. The use of q14 day PLD to allow more control over toxicity is suggested; a maximal starting dose of 20 mg/m2 is reasonable, although dose reduction will be common due to skin or mucosal toxicity. This combination can be given with limited toxicity, and meaningful responses were observed in recurrent sarcomas, including 2/4 Ewing sarcomas. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Assessing Steroid Toxicity in the Elderly with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5557-5557
Author(s):  
Vidhya Nair ◽  
Hadi Mohammed ◽  
Sharmeen Mahmood ◽  
Pushpinderdeep Singh Kahlon ◽  
Philip Kuriakose
Keyword(s):  
Central Nervous System ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Nervous System ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Full Dose ◽  
Starting Dose

Background The mainstay of treatment for Multiple Myeloma (MM) includes various combinations of chemotherapy, which generally includes high dose steroids. The median age at diagnosis for MM is above 60 years. Patients above the age of 70 may not be considered for an auto peripheral blood transplant, resulting in being treated with chemotherapy alone. This often leads to a relatively long period of steroid exposure. Increasing age is a risk factor for decreased tolerance to steroids, and increased drug toxicity. As such, the steroid dose (usually Dexamethasone) is often considered for reduction in patients above a certain age. However, there are no clear guidelines regarding a standard dose to use in the elderly, nor is there uniformity among clinicians in the way doses are chosen. Purpose To assess a) the starting dose of Dexamethasone (dex) in the elderly, b) frequency of dose reduction of dexamethasone, c) adverse effects of dex treatment in the elderly with MM, and d) average time after dose reduction. Methods We performed a 10 year retrospective chart review on patients, age 70 or greater treated at Henry Ford Health System with a diagnosis of MM from 2000-2015. Patients were grouped by age 70-75 years, 76-80 years, and greater than 80 years based on when treatment was initiated. We investigated the starting treatment dose of dex, ranging from 1-20 mg weekly and 21-40 mg weekly. Secondly, we assessed for the occurrence of dose reduction; and, if present, the length of time to reducing the dose. Lastly, the types of adverse effects to dex leading to dose reduction were grouped by system, such as, central nervous system, musculoskeletal, endocrine, gastrointestinal and psychiatric. Data collected was categorical, thus, no statistical tests were performed as this was a descriptive study. Results A total of 150 patients were reviewed and 91 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 8 (8.8%) were started at doses between 1-20 mg and majority (62.5%) were ages 70-75, thus, there was no relation between lower starting dose and age. Of the 91 patients, 24 (26.4%) had a dose reduction and 11 (12.1%) had both chemotherapy and dex discontinued prior to therapy completion. Majority (87.5%) of patients that had a dose reduction were initially started at 40 mg. The reasons for dose reduction included adverse effects grouped by musculoskeletal (29.17%), psychiatric (16.67%), endocrine (12.3%), central nervous system (4.17%), and gastrointestinal (4.17%). Of note, 8 patients (33.3%) had dose reductions as result of their clinical trial requirement. The average length of dex therapy before dose reduction was 17.2 months. Conclusion The majority of elderly patients (age 70 or above) with MM tolerated full doses of dex without adverse effects. Secondly, there was no relation between lower starting dose for dex and advanced age. However, since there were limited patients (n=8) who started at a low dose, other than those on clinical trials, we were not able to do a comparison of starting doses. But we were able to show that the majority of patients tolerated full dose, despite their age. The most frequent cause of steroid toxicity was musculoskeletal, such as leg swelling. On average, elderly patients were able to tolerate full dose of dex for over 1 year prior to requiring a dose reduction. Summary Our data demonstrates no correlation between advanced age in MM and lack of tolerability of high dose steroids. In conclusion, current findings do not justify reduced doses solely based on age alone. Future studies could include investigating statistical analysis on steroid exposure and survivorship. Disclosures Kuriakose: Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Dose Reductions Related to Adverse Effects in Patients with Waldenström Macroglobulinemia Treated with the BTK-Inhibitor Ibrutinib

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3529-3529
Author(s):  
Shayna Sarosiek ◽  
Joshua Gustine ◽  
Catherine A Flynn ◽  
Carly Leventoff ◽  
Timothy P White ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Medication Side Effects ◽  
Hematologic Response ◽  
Medication Side ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Btk Inhibitor ◽  
Dose Reductions

Abstract The BTK-inhibitor ibrutinib is the first FDA approved therapy for Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) and produces overall response rates &gt;90% and long-term disease control in both treatment naïve and previously treated patients. Despite the remarkable efficacy of ibrutinib, dose reduction is often required for intolerance. In this study, we analyzed those patients requiring a dose reduction and evaluated the time to dose reduction, the symptoms leading to dose reduction, the rate of improvement in symptoms after dose reduction, and the hematologic response at 12 months after dose reduction. 385 patients received treatment with ibrutinib in our clinic from May 2012 through October 2020. Their baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. Starting dose for these patients was 560 mg (n=11); 420 mg (n=358); 280 (n=15); 140 mg (n=1). Approximately 1/3 of all patients were treatment naïve at the time ibrutinib was initiated. Anemia, constitutional symptoms, and symptomatic hyperviscosity (or risk of hyperviscosity) were the most common reasons for treatment initiation. Reasons for dose reduction are shown in Table 2. Ninety-five patients (25%) required at least one dose reduction of ibrutinib. Twenty-three patients (6%) required a second dose reduction. Of the patients requiring dose reductions, 1 patient started at 280 mg and reduced to 140 mg, 91 patients started ibrutinib at 420 mg (1 patient ultimately had dose reduction to 70 mg, 22 patients to 140 mg, and 68 patients to 280 mg), and three patients started ibrutinib at 560 mg in the setting of Bing-Neel syndrome (2 patients had dose reduction to 420 mg and 1 patient to 280 mg). Patients requiring a dose reduction had a median age of 71 years (range, 46-96) at the time of ibrutinib initiation versus 66 years (range, 40-93) for those not requiring a dose reduction (p&lt;0.001). Forty-five patients (47%) of patients requiring dose reduction were female versus 98 (34%) not requiring dose reduction (p=0.017). Median time to first dose reduction was 7.3 months (range, 0.5-75) and median time to second dose reduction from initiation of ibrutinib was 23 months (range, 3-75). Of the 95 patients requiring a dose reduction, 40 patients (42% of all patients with dose reductions) had improvement in at least 1 of the medication side effects after the initial dose reduction. Twenty-two patients (23%) had complete resolution of adverse effects. Twenty-six patients (27%) had no change in symptoms and 10 of these patients required an additional dose reduction. After the second dose reduction, 5 patients had improvement or resolution in symptoms. Two patients had no adverse effects prior to dose reduction and medication was reduced simply due to drug interaction. Of the 48 patients with 1-year hematologic follow-up data available, 10 patients (21%) had improvement in hematologic response and 35 patients (73%) maintained their hematologic response despite dose reduction. Three patients (6%) had worsening of hematologic response after dose reduction. In conclusion, one quarter of WM patients in this series on ibrutinib required a dose reduction due to development of intolerable medication side effects. In the majority of these patients, adverse effects improved or resolved with dose reduction. Importantly, hematologic response remained stable or improved in most patients despite dose reduction. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Treon: BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Eli Lily: Research Funding; Abbvie/Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Castillo: Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Propensity Score Matching Analysis Comparing Extracorporeal Photopheresis (ECP) Vs Best Available Therapy in Third Line or Later Treatment of Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease (cGVHD)

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3896-3896
Author(s):  
Swe Mar Linn ◽  
Igor Novitzky-Basso ◽  
Elizabeth Shin ◽  
Christopher J. Patriquin ◽  
Ivan Pasic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Extracorporeal Photopheresis ◽  
Prednisone Dose ◽  
Steroid Dose ◽  
Previous Therapy ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Over Time

Abstract *DB and DK contributed to the work equally Background Prospective randomized controlled data comparing extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) to other treatments for chronic graft vs host disease (cGvHD) as third-line or later therapy are limited, despite its clinical benefit observed in patients (pts) who failed ≥ 2 lines of previous therapy. Our single-center experience has reported promising results, including 68.3% failure-free survival (FFS) and 85.9% overall survival (OS) at 12 months in 75 heavily pre-treated cGvHD pts treated with ECP (ASH 2021 Abstract ID 152640). The present study compared outcomes, using propensity-score matching (PSM), between ECP ("ECP group", n=74) and a historical cohort treated with best available therapy (BAT) as third-line or later treatment from 2007 to 2021 ("BAT group", n=132). Statistical endpoints such as FFS and OS, as well as steroid dose reduction were evaluated instead of overall response due to limited response assessment data available from retrospective chart review. Patients and methods The BAT group received MMF (n=71, 53.8%), prednisone (n=37, 28.0%), prednisone/cyclosporine (n=7, 5.3%), rituximab (n=7, 5.3%), and others (n=10, 7.6%). There was an imbalance in characteristics between the two groups, as expected; the ECP group had more pts with severe cGVHD (91.1% vs 20.5%; p&lt;0.001), fewer with a previous history of acute GVHD (aGvHD: 60.8% vs 78.0%; p=0.008), and fewer on a prednisone dose ≥0.5mg/kg/day (37.8% vs. 90.5%; p&lt;0.001). PSM analysis was applied to adjust risk factors imbalanced between groups, including cGVHD grade (mild/moderate vs severe), aGVHD history, and baseline prednisone dose (&lt;0.5 vs. ≥ 0.5 mg/kg/day). A total of 54 pts (27 case-control pairs) were selected via PSM within 0.2 of a calliper difference, resulting in the balancing of risk factors between groups: cGVHD severity (p=0.941), aGVHD history (p=0.75) and prednisone dose ≥ 0.5 mg/kg/day (p=0.788). FFS and OS were calculated from the day of starting ECP or BAT, and were compared using Cox's hazard model. Daily prednisone dose at months 0, 3 and 6 were calculated divided by body weight (kg), and the proportions of pts on prednisone ≤ 0, 0.1, 0.2 and 0.5mg/kg/day were compared. Results In the overall cohort (n=206), with a median 29 months of follow-up, 114 treatment failures (55.3%) occurred. While the non-relapse mortality (NRM) was similar in both groups, the ECP group showed a lower rate of resistance requiring therapy switch. Failure was noted in 27 ECP pts (36.4%) due to causes including resistance/intolerance requiring a switch to other therapy (n=15; 20.3%), NRM (n=11, 14.8%), and relapse (n=1; 1.4%), while 87 failures (65.9%) were noted in BAT pts due to resistance requiring a switch to other therapy (n=63; 47.7%), NRM (n=7; 5.3%), and relapse (n=17; 12.9%). In the overall cohort, the 12-month FFS was 68.3% and 32.0% in ECP and BAT groups (p&lt;0.0001; Fig 1A), while OS was 86.2% and 82.2% in ECP and BAT groups, respectively (p=0.333; Fig 1B). In the PSM cohort (n=54), the ECP group showed a survival benefit at 12 months: FFS was 65.8% in the ECP group vs. 30.5% in the BAT group (p=0.00226; Fig 2A), and OS was 76.6% in the ECP group vs. 67.1% in the BAT group (p=0.0977; Fig 2B). Multivariate analysis in the PSM cohort confirmed that ECP was superior to BAT for FFS (p=0.024, HR 0.317 [0.117-0.859]) when adjusted for other risk factors including cGVHD severity, aGvHD history, age, HCT-CI score and prednisone dose ≤0.5mg/kg/day. Prednisone doses were gradually reduced over time; the median doses of prednisone at months 0, 3, and 6 were 0.35, 0.22 and 0.11 mg/kg/day, respectively, in the ECP group vs. 0.96, 0.24 and 0.19mg/kg/day in the BAT group. ECP also showed better kinetics of steroid dose reduction over time; the proportions of pts who discontinued prednisone at months 0, 3 and 6 were 16.2, 17.6% and 32.4% in ECP group vs. 0.8%, 0% and 2.5% in BAT group (Fig 3). The differences in the proportion of pts (delta) who discontinued prednisone in the ECP vs. BAT groups were 15.4%, 17.6% and 29.9% at 0, 3, and 6 months, respectively. Conclusion In the current study using PSM analysis, use of ECP was associated with a superior FFS to BAT when used as third-line or later therapy in cGVHD patients who failed at least 2 lines of previous therapy. Use of ECP also allowed for better steroid tapering in comparison to BAT. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Patriquin: Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BioCryst Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Apellis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria. Law: Novartis: Consultancy; Actinium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Lipton: Bristol Myers Squibb, Ariad, Pfizer, Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Mattsson: MattssonAB medical: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Kim: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Paladin: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Meier Squibb: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Prolonged Lymphopenia and Infection Risk Is Mitigated By Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Patients with Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (iNHL) Treated with Bendamustine +/- Anti-CD20 Antibody: The Australasian Lymphoma Alliance Experience

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 47-49
Author(s):  
Kate Manos ◽  
Masa Lasica ◽  
Andrew Grigg ◽  
Pietro R Di Ciaccio ◽  
Jonathan Wong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cd20 Antibody ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Anti Cd20 ◽  
The Relationship

Background: Bendamustine +/- anti-CD20 antibody is a highly effective regimen for iNHL. Though initially favoured for its toxicity profile, subsequent analyses demonstrate profound and prolonged lymphopenia and the landmark phase III GALLIUM study showed a grade 3-5 infection rate of 20-26% in the bendamustine arms (Hiddemann JCO 2018). The relationship between severity and duration of lymphopenia and infection, and the role of antimicrobial prophylaxis (ppx), are not fully characterised. We performed a multicentre, retrospective analysis of bendamustine-treated iNHL patients (pts) to define the type and onset of infections, identify concomitant risk factors and evaluate the role of ppx. Methods: iNHL pts aged ≥18 yrs, treated with bendamustine +/- anti-CD20 in 1st-3rd line from 2011-2019, were identified from 9 Australian centres. HIV, prior transplant and long-term immunosuppression were excluded. Demographics, treatment, lymphocyte counts, infections and ppx were collected from baseline to 24 months post end of bendamustine treatment (EOT) or subsequent lymphoma therapy. Association between potential risk factors and infection was evaluated by logistic regression (odds ratio, OR) and negative binomial regression (incidence rate ratio, IRR) with Stata 16.1. Results: 302 pts were eligible. Baseline and treatment characteristics are summarised in Table 1. 252 infection episodes occurred across 134 pts (44%), equally divided between during therapy and after EOT (Figure 1A, Table 2). Infections on treatment occurred in 30% of pts (n=92) with 18% hospitalised (n = 54; n = 20 with febrile neutropenia (FN)) and dose delay /modification/ discontinuation in 11%. Late infections post EOT occurred in 23% of pts (n=70) with 11% hospitalised (n = 32; n = 12 with FN); infection post EOT was more common in pts on maintenance anti-CD20 (infection rate 49% v 16%, OR 5.1 p&lt;0.001). Opportunistic infections (OI) occurred in 21 pts: VZV (n=9; 4 on treatment, 5 post EOT, 1 on ppx); HSV (n=5, all on treatment without ppx); PJP (n=1, on treatment without ppx); nocardiosis (n=1, on treatment); other fungal infections (n=3, all on treatment); PML (n=1, 1-yr post EOT); CMV (n=1, at EOT). Lymphopenia was near universal and prolonged; 98% of pts became lymphopenic (53% grade 3, 9% grade 4) with a median nadir of 0.4x109/L (range 0-2.3). Median time to recovery (&gt;1x109/L) was 10 months post EOT; 39% of pts remained lymphopenic (4% grade 3/4) at 2 yrs (Figure 1B). However, neither lymphopenia nadir nor duration correlated with infection post EOT (OR 0.53 p=0.26 and 0.97 p=0.29 respectively) and the relationship between lymphocyte nadir and OI was not significant (OR 0.09 p=0.053). VZV/HSV and PJP ppx were prescribed to 42% and 54% respectively during treatment and continued for a median of 3 months post EOT (range 0-27, cessation date unknown in 60%). PJP ppx (sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim) was associated with fewer bacterial infections (OR 0.44 p=0.003) but did not reduce the incidence of FN (OR 0.83 p=0.63). Antiviral ppx (aciclovir/valaciclovir) was associated with fewer VZV/HSV infections (OR 0.10 p=0.026). More ppx was prescribed in 2018-2019 (post GALLIUM) than 2011-2017 (PCP ppx - OR 5.19 p&lt;0.001; VZV ppx - OR 3.76 p&lt;0.001; Figure 2) with an associated fall in the number of infections per pt (IRR 0.55, p=0.011). Factors independently associated with an increased number of infections (during and post EOT) were obinutuzumab vs rituximab (IRR 2.76, p&lt;0.001), maintenance anti-CD20 (IRR 3.43 p&lt;0.001), and stage III/IV disease (IRR 2.55, p=0.002). Factors specifically associated with infection post EOT were maintenance (OR 5.10 p&lt;0.001) and obinutuzumab (OR 3.51 p=0.001). ECOG, hypogammaglobulinaemia, comorbidity index, treatment line and disease subtype were not associated with infections during or post treatment. Conclusion: iNHL pts receiving bendamustine are at high risk of prolonged lymphopenia and infectious complications extending beyond treatment completion, with half of infections occurring post treatment cessation. Lymphopenia duration and nadir did not correlate with infection. PJP and antiviral ppx reduced risk of bacterial and VZV/HSV infections respectively, though rates of PJP and VZV/HSV were low. Prolonged ppx to mitigate the risk of late infections should be considered, particularly in pts with additional risk factors such as concomitant obinutuzumab and anti-CD20 maintenance. Disclosures Manos: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: Travel. Di Ciaccio:Jansen: Honoraria, Other: travel and accomodation grant. Hamad:Abbvie: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Gregory:Janssen: Consultancy; F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Genentech, Inc., MSD, AbbVie, BeiGene, AstraZeneca, Celgene, BMS: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Novartis, Sandoz, Gilead, AbbVie, MSD: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Novartis, AbbVie: Speakers Bureau; F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Novartis, Sandoz, Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gangatharan:Roche: Other: Travel grant. Hawkes:Merck Sharpe &Dohme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck KgA: Research Funding; takeda: Speakers Bureau.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document