Outcome of Adolescents and Young Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) As Compared to Pediatric AML Patients: Real World Data from SEER Registry

Abstract Background: Limited data exists regarding the characteristics and outcomes of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) which are largely under-represented in both pediatric and adult trials. We sought to compare the characteristics and outcomes of AYAs with AML using a large population based registry in the United States. Methods: We utilized Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-18 registry to identify all pediatric (0-18 years) and AYA (age 19-30 years) patients diagnosed with AML using appropriate histology codes based on the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, 3rd version. Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) were excluded from all analysis. Survival statistics were computed for each group using actuarial (Kaplan-Meier method) and compared using Z test for comparison of population proportions. Early mortality, defined as mortality within 1 month of diagnosis, was used as a surrogate for treatment related mortality. Kaplan Meier survival curves were plotted and compared using log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was done using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard regression model. All p values were two sided and the level of significance was chosen at 0.05. Results: A total of 6343 eligible patients were identified, which comprised 2836 (44.7%) AYAs. A total of 52% (n=3346) were males, whereas 76%(n=4825) were whites. Histologically, majority of patients (56%; n=3545) were categorized as AML, not otherwise specified, followed by acute monocytic leukemia (9.9%, n=630). Majority (55%; n-3509) of the patients were diagnosed between 2001-2012. The early mortality rate was lower in the pediatric AML patients (pAML) as compared to AYAs (6.2% vs 9.2%; p<0.01). Similarly the 1 year (70.3% versus 62.1%; p <0.01) and 5 year (48.2% vs 36.4%; p<0.01) was higher in pediatric patients as compared to AYAs. Kaplan Meier plot showed worse overall survival of AYAs compared to pAMLs (Figure 1; p value of log rank <0.01). Multivariate logistic regression showed higher early mortality among AYAs as compared to pAML patients (OR 1.48; 95% CI 1.23-1.79; p<0.01). Similarly Cox regression showed worse overall survival among AYAs as compared to pAML (HR 1.34; 95% CI 1.26-1.44; p <0.01) Conclusions: Our population based analysis shows worse overall survival among AYAs as compared to pAML patients. Future clinical trials specifically focused on this age group are warranted to establish appropriate treatment regimens in this population. Figure 1. Kaplan Meier Survival curve showing cumulative survival among pediatric patients with AML as compared to AYAs. Log rank test showed statistically significant difference between the two curves (p value <0.01) Figure 1. Kaplan Meier Survival curve showing cumulative survival among pediatric patients with AML as compared to AYAs. Log rank test showed statistically significant difference between the two curves (p value <0.01) Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

In Vitro Fatigue Resistance of Teeth Restored With Bulk Fill versus Conventional Composite Resin

Brazilian Dental Journal ◽

10.1590/0103-6440201600836 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 27 (4) ◽

pp. 452-457 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Gabrielle Branco Rauber ◽

Jussara Karina Bernardon ◽

Luiz Clovis Cardoso Vieira ◽

Hamilton Pires Maia ◽

Françoá Horn ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Fatigue Resistance ◽

Composite Resin ◽

Survival Curve ◽

Maximum Force ◽

Lower Percentage ◽

Rank Test ◽

Log Rank Test ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Meier Survival Curve

Abstract The aim of this study was to compare the fatigue resistance of restored teeth with bulk fill composite resin, conventional composite resin with incremental insertion and unprepared sound teeth. Twenty-eight extracted maxillary premolars were selected and divided into 4 groups based on composite resin and insertion technique: control (C), conventional composite resin with incremental insertion (I) and bulk fill composite resin with three (BF3) or single increment (BF1). The restored specimens were submitted to fatigue resistance test with a 5 Hz frequency. An initial application of 5,000 sinusoidal load cycles with a minimum force of 50 N and a maximum force of 200 N was used. Next, were applied stages of 30,000 load cycles with the maximum force increasing gradually: 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1200 and 1400 N. The test was concluded when 185,000 load cycles were achieved or the specimen failed. The fatigue resistance data were recorded for comparison, using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve and analyzed by log-rank test at 0.05 significance. Fractures were classified based on the position of the failure - above or below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). Statistical analysis of the Kaplan-Meier survival curve and log-rank test showed a significant difference between groups (p=0.001). The fracture analysis demonstrated that only 28.58% of failures were below the CEJ in group C, while for groups I, BF1 and BF3 they were 42.85%, 85.71% and 85.71%, respectively. Teeth restored with composite bulk fill in both techniques present similar fatigue resistance values compared with those restored with a conventional incremental insertion of composite, while the fatigue strength values of unprepared sound teeth were higher. Furthermore, unprepared sound teeth showed a lower percentage of fractures below the CEJ.

Download Full-text

Calcium channel blockers use and overall survival in pancreatic cancer patients receiving gemcitabine.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.e15756 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e15756-e15756 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Leszek Kraj ◽

Andrzej Śliwczyński ◽

Joanna Krawczyk-Lipiec ◽

Krzysztof Woźniak ◽

Anna Waszczuk-Gajda ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pancreatic Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Calcium Channel ◽

Calcium Channel Blockers ◽

Rank Test ◽

Channel Blockers ◽

Test Results ◽

Log Rank Test ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Significant Difference

e15756 Background: Preclinical studies have shown that calcium channel blockers (CCB) may potentiate anticancer effect of chemotherapy via intra-cellular drug accumulation. Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy is commonly used in pancreatic cancer (PC) patients. The aim of this study was to determine whether CCB may affect overall survival (OS) in PC patients receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. Methods: The retrospective cohort of PC patients treated with gemcitabine between 2007 and 2016 was identified in the Polish National Health Fund databases. Electronic records of prescriptions were searched to identify in this cohort patients receiving CCB (amlodipine, nitrendipine, felodipine, lacidipine). The primary endpoint was OS and it was determined by Kaplan-Meier methods and compared by the log-rank test. Results: In total 4628 PC patients treated with gemcitabine (median OS 7.7 months; 95% CI: 7.4-7.9) were identified. Among these 380 patients were prescribed any CCB. There was a significant difference (p < 0.001) in median OS between patients prescribed CCB (n = 380; OS 9.3 months; 95% CI: 7.8-11.0) and those who did not (n = 4214; OS 7.6 months; 95% CI: 7.3-7.8) with hazard ratio for death 0.70 (95% CI: 0.62-0.79). Notably, the survival curves tended to flatten in CCB group, with 24% of patients alive at 2 years (95% CI: 20-29%) and 15% alive at 5 years (95% CI: 11-19%), compared with 11% (95% CI: 10-12%) and 4% (95% CI: 4-5%) in controls respectively. Conclusions: The use of CCB in PC patients receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy was associated with improved OS. Further validation is needed to evaluate effectiveness of CCB-gemcitabine combinations in the management of PC.

Download Full-text

Survival Outcomes for Induction vs Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Maxillary Sinus

Otolaryngology ◽

10.1177/0194599818804777 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 160 (4) ◽

pp. 658-663 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Phoebe Kuo ◽

Sina J. Torabi ◽

Dennis Kraus ◽

Benjamin L. Judson

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽

Maxillary Sinus ◽

Induction Chemotherapy ◽

Squamous Cell ◽

Cox Regression ◽

Rank Test ◽

Controlled Clinical Trial ◽

Log Rank Test ◽

Kaplan Meier

Objective In advanced maxillary sinus cancers treated with surgery and radiotherapy, poor local control rates and the potential for organ preservation have prompted interest in the use of systemic therapy. Our objective was to present outcomes for induction compared to adjuvant chemotherapy in the maxillary sinus. Study Design Secondary database analysis. Setting National Cancer Database (NCDB). Subjects and Methods In total, 218 cases of squamous cell maxillary sinus cancer treated with surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy between 2004 and 2012 were identified from the NCDB and stratified into induction chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy cohorts. Univariate Kaplan-Meier analyses were compared by log-rank test, and multivariate Cox regression was performed to evaluate overall survival when adjusting for other prognostic factors. Propensity score matching was also used for further comparison. Results Twenty-three patients received induction chemotherapy (10.6%) and 195 adjuvant chemotherapy (89.4%). The log-rank test comparing induction to adjuvant chemotherapy was not significant ( P = .076). In multivariate Cox regression when adjusting for age, sex, race, comorbidity, grade, insurance, and T/N stage, there was a significant mortality hazard ratio of 2.305 for adjuvant relative to induction chemotherapy (confidence interval, 1.076-4.937; P = .032). Conclusion Induction chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival in comparison to adjuvant chemotherapy in a relatively small cohort of patients (in whom treatment choice cannot be characterized), suggesting that this question warrants further investigation in a controlled clinical trial before any recommendations are made.

Download Full-text

ANALISIS KURVA SURVIVAL KAPLAN MEIER MENGGUNAKAN UJI LOG RANK (Studi Kasus :Pasien Penyakit Jantung Koroner di RSUD Undata Palu)

Jurnal Gaussian ◽

10.14710/j.gauss.v7i1.26633 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 7 (1) ◽

pp. 33-42

Author(s):

Arianti Suhartini ◽

Rita Rahmawati ◽

Suparti Suparti

Keyword(s):

Coronary Heart Disease ◽

Heart Disease ◽

Survival Curve ◽

Disease Status ◽

Lifestyle Changes ◽

Rank Test ◽

Self Awareness ◽

Log Rank Test ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Central Sulawesi

Coronary heart disease is one of the leading causes of death in the world, including Indonesia. Based on doctor-diagnosed interviews, coronary heart disease’s prevalence in Indonesia on 2013 is 0,5% and based on a doctor-diagnosed is 1,5%. Central Sulawesi is ranked first and second for prevalence based on doctor-diagnosed interviews and doctor-diagnosed. The high number of people with coronary heart disease caused by lack of self-awareness in lifestyle changes. One of the parameters used to assess the success of treatment is the probability of survival. Survival analysis is a data analysis where the outcome of the variables studied is the time until an event occurs. This study raised the problem of survival of coronary heart patients at Undata Palu Hospital which is the main referral hospital for Central Sulawesi region. This research uses nonparametric method that is Kaplan Meier and Log Rank Test based on six factors are age, gender, stadium, disease status, complication and status of anemia. Nonparametric methods do not follow a particular distribution for survival time. Kaplan Meier's survival curve will describe the patient's characteristics of survival probability and followed by a Log Rank test to see if there are differences between curves. The result of analysis and discussion based on Log Rank test result showed that the factors of age, sex and disease status differ significantly. Keywords: Coronary heart disease, RSUD Undata Palu, Kaplan Meier analysis, Log Rank test.

Download Full-text

Impact of Treatment Facility Chracteristics on Patient (Pt) Outcomes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Using Data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139034 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 22-22

Author(s):

Allison Taylor ◽

Kimberley Doucette ◽

Bryan Chan ◽

Xiaoyang Ma ◽

Jaeil Ahn ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Hazard Analysis ◽

Treatment Options ◽

Academic Research ◽

High Volume ◽

Rank Test ◽

Rural Residence ◽

Integrated Network ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Significant Difference

Introduction The literature suggests a widespread reduction in the availability and accessibility of newer treatment options among marginalized groups in AML. Studies from large national databases point to lower socio-economic status, Hispanic and African American race, Medicare or no insurance, being unmarried, treatment at non-academic centers, and rural residence as negatively impacting overall survival (OS) and rates of chemotherapy utilization in AML patients (Patel et al. 2015, Jaco et al. 2017, Bhatt et al. 2018, Master et al. 2016). We hypothesized that facility affiliation and pt volume would also have important effects on time to treatment (TTT) and OS in AML, even when these socioeconomic disparities were accounted for. Methods For this retrospective analysis, we used NCDB data that included 124,988 pts over the age of 18 with AML between the years 2004-2016. Variables analyzed included facility types described as community cancer programs (CP), comprehensive community cancer programs (CCP), academic/research center cancer programs (AC) and integrated network cancer programs (IN), and volume of facilities defined as high volume (HV) and low volume (LV). HV facilities had case volumes of ≥ 99th percentile and all other facilities were classified as LV. Multivariate analyses (MVA) included demographic and socioeconomic covariables. We used Cox proportional hazard analysis for both TTT and OS MVA. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate median TTT and OS, and the log rank test used to compare TTT and OS across predictor variables. Results The median age of AML patients was 63 yrs (range 18-90) with 54% males, and 86% Caucasian. Five percent of patients were treated at CP, 30% at CCP, 44% at AC, and 10% at IN. 21% at HV facilities and 79% at LV facilities. Median TTT in days at CP facilities was 7, compared to 5 days in CCP and AC facilities versus 4 days at IN (p<0.0001). TTT was 5 days at HV facilities versus 4 days at LV facilities (p<0.0001). Kaplan-Meier curves showed that TTT was similar between HV and LV facilities(figure 1). The median OS was 3.25 months in CP compared to 4.34 months at CCP, 5.06 months at IN and 9.53 months at AC (p<0.0001). For facility volume, the median OS was 13.11 months in HV facilities compared to 6.93 months in LV facilities (p<0.0001). When sex, race, age, Hispanic Origin, education, urban/rural residence, Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity score and Great Circle Distance were adjusted for in MVA (table 1), the OS was higher in AC versus CP facilities (hazard ratio [HR] of 0.90 (0.87-0.93, p<0.0001), and there was no statistically significant difference with comparison of other facility types to CP. Similarly, there was a lower OS at LV versus HV facilities with a HR of 1.14 (1.12-1.16, p<0.0001). CCP facilities had a shorter TTT compared to CP with a HR of 1.21 (1.17-1.26, p<0.0001). AC had a shorter TTT than CP with a HR of 1.17 (1.13-1.22, p<0.0001), and IN had a shorter TTT compared to CP with a HR of 1.29 (1.24-1.34, p<0.0001). Additionally, TTT in the MVA for facility volume was shorter in LV facilities compared to HV facilities with HR of 1.05 (1.04-1.07, p<0.0001) [table 1]. Conclusion When adjusting for various socioeconomic factors, we found that TTT was longest in CP compared to CCP, AC, and IN. Treatment at a LV facility resulted in a decreased overall survival. LV facilities may be less familiar with treatment regimens for AML, less likely to use novel treatment options, and be less familiar with the disease. We showed that treatment at an AC compared to CP, CCP and IN facilities improved survival. Given poor outcomes for AML, these results show the importance of going to AC and HV facilities with more experience in treating AML for improved outcomes. Disclosures Lai: Astellas: Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Macrogenics: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Clinical Characteristics and Overall Survival in Patients with Anaplastic Pancreatic Cancer

The American Surgeon ◽

10.1177/000313481408000218 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 80 (2) ◽

pp. 117-123 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Clancy J. Clark ◽

Janani S. Arun ◽

Rondell P. Graham ◽

Lizhi Zhang ◽

Michael Farnell ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pancreatic Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽

Tumor Stage ◽

Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽

Rank Test ◽

Poor Overall Survival ◽

Perioperative Morbidity ◽

Log Rank Test ◽

Kaplan Meier

Anaplastic pancreatic cancer (APC) is a rare undifferentiated variant of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with poor overall survival (OS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of APC compared with differentiated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. We conducted a retrospective review of all patients treated at the Mayo Clinic with pathologically confirmed APC from 1987 to 2011. After matching with control subjects with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, OS was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and log-rank test. Sixteen patients were identified with APC (56.3% male, median age 57 years). Ten patients underwent exploration of whom eight underwent pancreatectomy. Perioperative morbidity was 60 per cent with no mortality. The median OS was 12.8 months. However, patients with APC who underwent resection had longer OS compared with those who were not resected, 34.1 versus 3.3 months ( P = 0.001). After matching age, sex, tumor stage, and year of operation, the median OS was similar between patients with APC and those with ductal adenocarcinoma treated with pancreatic resection, 44.1 versus 39.9 months, ( P = 0.763). Overall survival for APC is poor; however, when resected, survival is similar to differentiated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Download Full-text

Combining Proteomics and Gene Expression Profiling Identifies Proteins/Genes Associated with Short Overall Survival in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.197.197 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 197-197

Author(s):

Ricky D Edmondson ◽

Shweta S. Chavan ◽

Christoph Heuck ◽

Bart Barlogie

Keyword(s):

Gene Expression ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Multivariate Analyses ◽

Rank Test ◽

P Value ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Training Set ◽

Test Set ◽

Log Rank Test ◽

Test Sets

Abstract Abstract 197 We and others have used gene expression profiling to classify multiple myeloma into high and low risk groups; here, we report the first combined GEP and proteomics study of a large number of baseline samples (n=85) of highly enriched tumor cells from patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. Peptide expression levels from MS data on CD138-selected plasma cells from a discovery set of 85 patients with newly diagnosed myeloma were used to identify proteins that were linked to short survival (OS < 3 years vs OS ≥ 3 years). The proteomics dataset consisted of intensity values for 11,006 peptides (representing 2,155 proteins), where intensity is the quantitative measure of peptide abundance; Peptide intensities were normalized by Z score transformation and significance analysis of microarray (SAM) was applied resulting in the identification 24 peptides as differentially expressed between the two groups (OS < 3 years vs OS ≥ 3 years), with fold change ≥1.5 and FDR <5%. The 24 peptides mapped to 19 unique proteins, and all were present at higher levels in the group with shorter overall survival than in the group with longer overall survival. An independent SAM analysis with parameters identical to the proteomics analysis (fold change ≥1.5; FDR <5%) was performed with the Affymetrix U133Plus2 microarray chip based expression data. This analysis identified 151 probe sets that were differentially expressed between the two groups; 144 probe sets were present at higher levels and seven at lower levels in the group with shorter overall survival. Comparing the SAM analyses of proteomics and GEP data, we identified nine probe sets, corresponding to seven genes, with increased levels of both protein and mRNA in the short lived group. In order to validate these findings from the discovery experiment we used GEP data from a randomized subset of the TT3 patient population as a training set for determining the optimal cut-points for each of the nine probe sets. Thus, TT3 population was randomized into two sub-populations for the training set (two-thirds of the population; n=294) and test set (one-third of the population; n=147); the Total Therapy 2 (TT2) patient population was used as an additional test set (n=441). A running log rank test was performed on the training set for each of the nine probe sets to determine its optimal gene expression cut-point. The cut-points derived from the training set were then applied to TT3 and TT2 test sets to investigate survival differences for the groups separated by the optimal cutpoint for each probe. The overall survival of the groups was visualized using the method of Kaplan and Meier, and a P-value was calculated (based on log-rank test) to determine whether there was a statistically significant difference in survival between the two groups (P ≤0.05). We performed univariate regression analysis using Cox proportional hazard model with the nine probe sets as variables on the TT3 test set. To identify which of the genes corresponding to these nine probes had an independent prognostic value, we performed a multivariate stepwise Cox regression analysis. wherein CACYBP, FABP5, and IQGAP2 retained significance after competing with the remaining probe sets in the analysis. CACYBP had the highest hazard ratio (HR 2.70, P-value 0.01). We then performed the univariate and multivariate analyses on the TT2 test set where CACYBP, CORO1A, ENO1, and STMN1 were selected by the multivariate analysis, and CACYBP had the highest hazard ratio (HR 1.93, P-value 0.004). CACYBP was the only gene selected by multivariate analyses of both test sets. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Human Herpes Virus 6 Infection in 54 Patients after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Clinical Manifestations and Outcome

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.3899.3899 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 3899-3899

Author(s):

Raffaella Greco ◽

Lara Crucitti ◽

Sara Racca ◽

Roee Dvir ◽

Francesca Lorentino ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Clinical Manifestations ◽

Rank Test ◽

P Value ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Clinical Complications ◽

Log Rank Test ◽

Blue Line

Abstract BACKGROUND: Human herpesvirus type 6 (HHV-6) is increasingly recognized as an opportunistic and potentially life-threatening pathogen in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AlloSCT). HHV-6 is a member of the beta herpesvirus subfamily (genus Roseolovirus). HHV-6 infection is recognized as the cause of a febrile disease and exanthem subitum in early childhood. Approximately 60% of solid organ transplant and 40% of patients after alloSCT experienced HHV-6 reactivation. Reported clinical manifestations of HHV-6 infection in transplanted patients are skin rash, interstitial pneumonia, bone marrow suppression and encephalitis. Moreover, some clinical reports suggest that HHV-6 can facilitate the occurrence of severe clinical complications of alloSCT, increasing transplant-related mortality. METHODS: From January 2009 to February 2013, we retrospectively evaluated 54 consecutive adult patients (median age 50 years) who developed positivity to HHV-6 after alloSCT for high-risk hematological malignancies. Stem cell donors were family haploidentical (37), HLA identical sibling (8), unrelated volunteer (6), cord blood (3). The viral load was determined by quantitative PCR (Nanogen Advanced Diagnostic S.r.L) in cell-free body fluids such as plasma, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), bone marrow (BM) aspirates or in gastrointestinal biopsies. RESULTS: Median time from alloSCT to HHV-6 reactivation was 34 days (range: 0-705). Thirty-one patients presented HHV-6 positive in plasma, 9/54 in BM, 33/54 in gut biopsies or BAL, 7/54 in CSF. At the time of viral positivity all pts were receiving acyclovir as viral prophylaxis except five. Twenty-nine patients had acute graft versus host disease (GvHD). Twenty-two out of these twenty-nine patients experienced a grade III-IV acute GvHD, requiring high dose steroids in twenty-six cases. A concomitant CMV positivity was detected in 15/54 patients. The median absolute count of CD3+ lymphocytes was 207 cells/mcl. In 52/54 cases we reported HHV-6 clinical manifestations: fever (43), skin rash (22), hepatitis (19), diarrhoea (24), encephalitis (10), BM suppression (18), delayed engraftment (11). HHV-6 positivity led to antiviral pharmacological treatment in 37/54 cases, using as first choice therapy foscarnet. Amongst the total fifty-four patients with documented HHV-6 positivity thirty-one solved the clinical event. However the mortality rate was relatively high in this population (overall survival (OS) ±SE at 1 year after HHV-6 reactivation was 38% ± 7%), mainly related to severe infections or GvHD. A better OS is significantly associated with CD3+ cells ≥200/mcl at the time of HHV-6 reactivation (fig 1) (OS at 1 year 63% compared to 11% for patients with CD3 <200/mcl; HR: 0.27, 95% CI 0.12-0.54, p=0.0002). The overall survival of these patients was also positively affected by the absence of acute GvHD grade III-IV at time of viral reactivation (HR: 0.03, 95% CI 1.08-4.03, p=0.03) and by the complete disease remission at time of HSCT (HR:0.26, 95% CI 0.07-0.89, p=0.03). In this analysis the overall survival was not significantly influenced by steroids administration (HR: 1.36, 95% CI 0.71-2.60, p=0.36), time after alloSCT (HR: 1.30, 95% CI 0.51-3.33, p=0.59), type of antiviral prophylaxis (HR: 1.02, 95% CI 0.45-2.33, p=0.96), plasma viral load (HR:1.18, 95% CI 0.51-2.76, p=0.69) and organ involvement (HR:1.14, 95% CI 0.59-2.20, p=0.70). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study confirms a correlation of HHV-6 with high morbidity and mortality rates after alloSCT, thus suggesting a regular HHV-6 monitoring in alloSCT recipients. The regular monitoring of HHV-6 DNA, using a real-time PCR assay, may be useful for identifying active HHV-6 infection and for the introduction of a pre-emptive treatment, possibly reducing the incidence of the most severe clinical complications. Despite HHV-6 detection typically occurred early after alloSCT, a better immune reconstitution has the potential to improve clinical outcome. Figure 1: Overall survival after alloSCT in HHV-6 positive patients: green line showed patients with more than 200/mcl CD3+ cells, blue line the ones with less than 200/mcl CD3+ cells at HHV-6 reactivation. P value is provided by Log Rank test. Figure 1:. Overall survival after alloSCT in HHV-6 positive patients: green line showed patients with more than 200/mcl CD3+ cells, blue line the ones with less than 200/mcl CD3+ cells at HHV-6 reactivation. P value is provided by Log Rank test. Disclosures Bonini: MolMed S.p.A.: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Overall survival trends in pediatric osteosarcoma patients over the past three decades

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.10041 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 10041-10041

Author(s):

R. van Schie ◽

M. Hagleitner ◽

P. Hoogerbrugge ◽

U. Flucke ◽

H. Schreuder ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽

Rank Test ◽

Histological Response ◽

Treatment Protocols ◽

Treatment Regimens ◽

The Past ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Pediatric Osteosarcoma

10041 Background: In the late seventies, the combination of chemotherapy and surgery, significantly improved survival of osteosarcoma patients. However, the chemotherapeutic drugs used for treatment of osteosarcoma patients has not significantly changed since then although surgery clearly improved further and adjuvant chemotherapy have been added. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated, whether after the introduction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the late seventies, further improvement in outcome of pediatric osteosarcoma patients was achieved. Methods: Since 1978 and 2008, 54 previously untreated pediatric patients with osteosarcoma were enrolled in six consecutive regimens of different agents and intensity. The main difference between the treatment protocols is the addition of either methothrexate or ifosfamide. Overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) in relationship to the different treatment regimens was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Significance of difference in outcome were calculated using the log rank test. Results: The 5-year EFS and OS of the whole group was 54.7% and 61.1%, respectively. There was no significant difference in outcome in patients treated between 1978 and 1993 (n = 18), as compared to patients treated after 1993 (n = 36, OS 47.1% vs 69.4%, p = 0.34). Of all treatment regimens used, OS was the highest in patients treated with cisplatin, doxorubicin, and methotrexate (OS after 5 year 70%). Multivariate analysis showed that EFS and OS significantly correlated with the histological response but not with one of the treatment regimens used. Conclusions: No significant improvement in overall survival has been accomplished in pediatric osteosarcoma patients during the past thirty years. Histological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was the most important prognostic factor. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text

Adherence to the BCLC guidelines and impact on overall survival.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2014.32.3_suppl.345 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽

pp. 345-345 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Jesna Mathew ◽

Sasha Slipak ◽

Anil Kotru ◽

Joseph Blansfield ◽

Nicole Woll ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Survival Benefit ◽

Cox Regression ◽

Early Stage ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Tertiary Care ◽

Treatment Recommendations ◽

Rank Test ◽

P Value ◽

Significant Difference

345 Background: Multiple studies exist that validate the prognostic value of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging. However, none have established a survival benefit to the treatment recommendations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the adherence to the BCLC guidelines at a rural tertiary care center, and to determine the effect of following the treatment recommendations on overall survival. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted for 97 patients newly diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from 2000 to 2012. The treatment choice was compared with the BCLC guidelines and percentage adherence calculated. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log rank test was used to test the difference between the two groups. Cox regression tests were used to determine independent effects of stage, treatment aggressiveness, and guideline adherence on survival. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Of 97 patients, 75% (n=73) were male. Median overall survival was 12.9 months. In 59.8% (n=58) of the patients, treatment was adherent to stage specific guidelines proposed by the BCLC classification. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the adherent and non-adherent groups (11.2 vs 14.1 months, p<0.98). However on stage specific survival analysis, we noted a significant survival benefit for adherence to the guidelines for early stage HCC (27.9 vs 14.1 months, p<0.05), but a decrease in survival for adherence in the end stage (20 days vs 9.3 months, p<0.01). On univariate analysis, more aggressive treatment was associated with increased survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22 to 0.87; p = 0.018). Multivariate analysis revealed that adherence did not independently affect survival when stage and aggressiveness of treatment were included in the model (HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.76 to 2.2, p = 0.34). Conclusions: Although the BCLC guidelines serve as a practical guide to the management of patients with HCC, they are not universally practiced. These results indicate that survival of patients with hepatocellular cancer is determined by stage and aggressiveness of treatment, not adherence to BCLC guidelines.

Download Full-text