scholarly journals Mammographic density change in a cohort of premenopausal women receiving tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention over 5 years

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam R. Brentnall ◽  
Ruth Warren ◽  
Elaine F. Harkness ◽  
Susan M. Astley ◽  
Julia Wiseman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Mammographic Density ◽  
Breast Density ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Linear Mixed Model ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Density Change ◽  
Percentage Density ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background A decrease in breast density due to tamoxifen preventive therapy might indicate greater benefit from the drug. It is not known whether mammographic density continues to decline after 1 year of therapy, or whether measures of breast density change are sufficiently stable for personalised recommendations. Methods Mammographic density was measured annually over up to 5 years in premenopausal women with no previous diagnosis of breast cancer but at increased risk of breast cancer attending a family-history clinic in Manchester, UK (baseline 2010-2013). Tamoxifen (20 mg/day) for prevention was prescribed for up to 5 years in one group; the other group did not receive tamoxifen and were matched by age. Fully automatic methods were used on mammograms over the 5-year follow-up: three area-based measures (NN-VAS, Stratus, Densitas) and one volumetric (Volpara). Additionally, percentage breast density at baseline and first follow-up mammograms was measured visually. The size of density declines at the first follow-up mammogram and thereafter was estimated using a linear mixed model adjusted for age and body mass index. The stability of density change at 1 year was assessed by evaluating mean squared error loss from predictions based on individual or mean density change at 1 year. Results Analysis used mammograms from 126 healthy premenopausal women before and as they received tamoxifen for prevention (median age 42 years) and 172 matched controls (median age 41 years), with median 3 years follow-up. There was a strong correlation between percentage density measures used on the same mammogram in both the tamoxifen and no tamoxifen groups (all correlation coeficients > 0.8). Tamoxifen reduced mean breast density in year 1 by approximately 17–25% of the inter-quartile range of four automated percentage density measures at baseline, and from year 2, it decreased further by approximately 2–7% per year. Predicting change at 2 years using individual change at 1 year was approximately 60–300% worse than using mean change at 1year. Conclusions All measures showed a consistent and large average tamoxifen-induced change in density over the first year, and a continued decline thereafter. However, these measures of density change at 1 year were not stable on an individual basis.

Breast Cancer in Young Women after Treatment with Irradiation for Hodgkin’s Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3333-3333
Author(s):  
Linda Lee ◽  
Melania Pintilie ◽  
David Hodgson ◽  
Michael Crump
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Breast Density ◽  
Young Women ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Breast Mri ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract BACKGROUND: Women who are survivors of Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (HL) are at increased risk of developing breast cancer (BCa) as a long-term complication due to the use of extended field (mantle) irradiation (RT) of disease above the diaphragm. Many young women are at significantly increased risk of BCa prior to the age at which routine screening mammography is recommended for the general population. The sensitivity of mammography is lower in these women, in part due to increased breast tissue density characteristic of young pre-menopausal women. Currently, there is a paucity of information on the optimal screening modality and surveillance frequency for these women. METHODS: We reviewed the current BCa screening strategies used for this high risk group at our centre and described the incidence, method of detection, and characteristics of secondary BCas in a cohort of 115 women who received supradiaphragmatic RT for HL before age 30 between 1965 and 2000 at Princess Margaret Hospital (PMH) and who subsequently accepted long-term follow-up in a high-risk screening clinic. RESULTS: Median age at treatment was 22 (range 9–30). Radiation fields were mantle in 106 women, modified mantle in 6, and involved field in 3 (median dose delivered: 35 Gy, range 15–60). RT alone was used for 44 patients while 71 received combined modality therapy, of which 45 (65%) received MOPP. Treatment induced amenorrhea occurred in 15 women (median age 38); hormone replacement therapy was subsequently used by 9. Of the 107 women who participated in annual radiographic BCa screening, 95 were screened with mammogram alone, 1 with breast MRI alone, 8 with mammogram and MRI, and 3 with mammogram and ultrasound. Median age at first mammogram was 36; however, median age decreased with more recent year of HL diagnosis (age 40 for women diagnosed before 1985 compared to age 33 for women diagnosed after 1985, p<0.0001). Women with high breast density received MRI screening more often (p=0.02); however, breast density was not significantly associated with previous breast radiation dose or age at last follow-up. Twelve women were diagnosed with BCa in this cohort, following active breast surveillance for a median of 5 years (representing 584 person-years). The 20-year cumulative incidence of breast cancer was 10.9% (95% CI 5.3–18.8%) in this group of women. This was comparable to the 20-year cumulative incidence of breast cancer of 12% (95% CI 8–17%) in all 448 women with HL treated with supradiaphragmatic radiation before age 30 at PMH during the same time period. BCa occurred after a median of 17 years after treatment for HL (range 13–28). Median age at BCa diagnosis was 40 (range 31–51). Seven cancers were detected by physical exam (6 node-positive invasive BCas, 1 in-situ BCa) and 5 were detected on annual mammograms (1 node-positive invasive BCa, 4 in-situ BCas). CONCLUSIONS: Although women in the more recent treatment cohort are receiving their first mammogram at a younger age, the majority of BCas were still detected clinically, and these BCas had less favorable pathological characteristics. More frequent breast imaging should be considered in women who have had supradiaphragmatic RT for HL. Prospective evaluation of breast MRI as a screening strategy for HL survivors has been initiated at PMH in an effort to detect BCa at an earlier stage.

The effect of raloxifene on breast MRI volume in premenopausal women at increased risk for invasive breast cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1518-1518
Author(s):  
J. Eng-Wong ◽  
C. K. Chow ◽  
J. Orzano ◽  
D. Venzon ◽  
J. Zujewski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Mammographic Density ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Breast Mri ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Change ◽  
One Year ◽  
Relative Change

1518 Background: Breast MRI volume (MRIV) and mammographic density (MD) assess the amount of fibroglandular tissue in the breast. While increased MD is associated with a 4 to 6 fold increase in breast cancer risk, the association between MRIV and breast cancer is unknown. Previous studies have shown that MRIV and MD can be modulated with hormonal interventions. We evaluated the effect of raloxifene on MRIV in premenopausal women at increased risk for breast cancer. We have previously reported that raloxifene did not change MD in this cohort. Raloxifene is indicated for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis but not for prevention of breast cancer or for use in premenopausal women. Methods: Premenopausal women at increased risk by virtue of: Gail model risk > 1.7% over 5 years; lobular neoplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ, BRCA1/2 mutation positive, or a very strong family history were eligible for this phase II chemoprevention study. MRIs obtained at baseline and after two years on raloxifene 60 mg daily, and one year after discontinuing the drug were evaluated.T1 weighted spoiled gradient-echo MRI with fat suppression was used to determine volume using a semiautomatic method, after visual verification. Median relative change in MRIV was assessed by the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: 19 of 30 subjects who started study drug had breast MRI at baseline and after 2 years on raloxifene; median relative change was -16% (range -57 to +25%) (p=0.0004). 17 subjects had MRI at year 2 and one year after stopping drug. No significant change in MRIV was observed after stopping raloxifene, median relative change -9% (p=0.64). Conclusions: MRIV significantly declined while on raloxifene. In contrast no significant change in percent mammographic density in this same cohort was seen. Our findings suggest that MRIV may be a better surrogate biomarker than MD in premenopausal women at risk for breast cancer because of less variation in its measurement. MRIV should be further evaluated as a potential surrogate biomarker in prevention studies. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Assessment of breast carcinoma by correlating BI-RADS scoring with mammographic density

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 3674
Author(s):  
Simranjit K. Dhadiala ◽  
Shilpa Patankar
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Carcinoma ◽  
Mammographic Density ◽  
Breast Density ◽  
Breast Imaging ◽  
Breast Tissue ◽  
Breast Cancer Risk Factor ◽  
Breast Disease ◽  
Cancer Risk Factor ◽  
Increased Risk

Background: Breast density assessed by mammogram expressed in percentage of density of breast tissue reflects variations in breast tissue composition and is strongly associated with increased risk of breast cancer. The BI-RADS density method was created to indicate whether a mammogram represents a negative, benign or suspected malignant finding. To assess breast carcinoma by correlating breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS) scoring with mammographic density.Methods: A total of 100 consecutive female patients with breast lump were assessed. The findings of the radiological examination and the histopathology results were subsequently analyzed to study the details of the breast disease in the group surveyed. BI-RADS classifications of breast density was extracted from mammography reports.Results: Majority of patients were having BI-RADS score 4 (33%) followed by BI-RADS score 5 (30%). Majority of the patients were having percentage breast density 4 (35%) followed by Percentage breast density 3 (28%). BI-RADS score and percentage breast density had statistically significant correlation (p<0.05).Conclusions: The BI-RADS score and percentage breast density by mammography had statistically significant correlation. Mammographic density is a strong breast cancer risk factor.

scholarly journals Mammographic Density Changes over Time and Breast Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (19) ◽  
pp. 4805
Author(s):  
Arezo Mokhtary ◽  
Andreas Karakatsanis ◽  
Antonis Valachis
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Cancer Risk ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Mammographic Density ◽  
Breast Density ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Changes Over Time ◽  
Over Time

The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the association between mammographic density changes over time and the risk of breast cancer. We performed a systematic literature review based on the PubMed and ISI Web of Knowledge databases. A meta-analysis was conducted by computing extracted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for cohort studies or odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence interval using inverse variance method. Of the nine studies included, five were cohort studies that used HR as a measurement type for their statistical analysis and four were case–control or cohort studies that used OR as a measurement type. Increased breast density over time in cohort studies was associated with higher breast cancer risk (HR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.33–1.96) whereas decreased breast density over time was associated with lower breast cancer risk (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.71–0.87). Similarly, increased breast density over time was associated with higher breast cancer risk in studies presented ORs (pooled OR: 1.85; 95% CI: 1.29–2.65). Our findings imply that an increase in breast density over time seems to be linked to an increased risk of breast cancer, whereas a decrease in breast density over time seems to be linked to a lower risk of breast cancer.

Long-term seizure outcomes after pediatric temporal lobectomy: does brain MRI lesion matter?

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 200-208
Author(s):  
Ravindra Arya ◽  
Francesco T. Mangano ◽  
Paul S. Horn ◽  
Sabrina K. Kaul ◽  
Serena K. Kaul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Linear Mixed Model ◽  
Hippocampal Sclerosis ◽  
Brain Mri ◽  
Temporal Lobectomy ◽  
Seizure Freedom ◽  
Seizure Onset

OBJECTIVEThere is emerging data that adults with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) without a discrete lesion on brain MRI have surgical outcomes comparable to those with hippocampal sclerosis (HS). However, pediatric TLE is different from its adult counterpart. In this study, the authors investigated if the presence of a potentially epileptogenic lesion on presurgical brain MRI influences the long-term seizure outcomes after pediatric temporal lobectomy.METHODSChildren who underwent temporal lobectomy between 2007 and 2015 and had at least 1 year of seizure outcomes data were identified. These were classified into lesional and MRI-negative groups based on whether an epilepsy-protocol brain MRI showed a lesion sufficiently specific to guide surgical decisions. These patients were also categorized into pure TLE and temporal plus epilepsies based on the neurophysiological localization of the seizure-onset zone. Seizure outcomes at each follow-up visit were incorporated into a repeated-measures generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) with MRI status as a grouping variable. Clinical variables were incorporated into GLMM as covariates.RESULTSOne hundred nine patients (44 females) were included, aged 5 to 21 years, and were classified as lesional (73%), MRI negative (27%), pure TLE (56%), and temporal plus (44%). After a mean follow-up of 3.2 years (range 1.2–8.8 years), 66% of the patients were seizure free for ≥ 1 year at last follow-up. GLMM analysis revealed that lesional patients were more likely to be seizure free over the long term compared to MRI-negative patients for the overall cohort (OR 2.58, p < 0.0001) and for temporal plus epilepsies (OR 1.85, p = 0.0052). The effect of MRI lesion was not significant for pure TLE (OR 2.64, p = 0.0635). Concordance of ictal electroencephalography (OR 3.46, p < 0.0001), magnetoencephalography (OR 4.26, p < 0.0001), and later age of seizure onset (OR 1.05, p = 0.0091) were associated with a higher likelihood of seizure freedom. The most common histological findings included cortical dysplasia types 1B and 2A, HS (40% with dual pathology), and tuberous sclerosis.CONCLUSIONSA lesion on presurgical brain MRI is an important determinant of long-term seizure freedom after pediatric temporal lobectomy. Pediatric TLE is heterogeneous regarding etiologies and organization of seizure-onset zones with many patients qualifying for temporal plus nosology. The presence of an MRI lesion determined seizure outcomes in patients with temporal plus epilepsies. However, pure TLE had comparable surgical seizure outcomes for lesional and MRI-negative groups.

Identifying patients with CKD risk at the time of nephrectomy: When to initiate nephrology consult

2021 ◽  
pp. 239936932110319
Author(s):  
Yihe Yang ◽  
Zachary Kozel ◽  
Purva Sharma ◽  
Oksana Yaskiv ◽  
Jose Torres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Radical Nephrectomy ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Linear Mixed Model ◽  
Interstitial Fibrosis ◽  
Kidney Neoplasm ◽  
Tubular Atrophy ◽  
Independent Risk Factors

Introduction: The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is high among kidney neoplasm patients because of the overlapping risk factors. Our purpose is to identify kidney cancer survivors with higher CKD risk. Methods: We studied a retrospective cohort of 361 kidney tumor patients with partial or radical nephrectomy. Linear mixed model was performed. Results: Of patients with follow-up >3 months, 84% were identified retrospectively to fulfill criteria for CKD diagnosis, although CKD was documented in only 15%. Urinalysis was performed in 205 (57%) patients at the time of nephrectomy. Multivariate analysis showed interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) >25% ( p = 0.005), severe arteriolar sclerosis ( p = 0.013), female gender ( p = 0.024), older age ( p = 0.012), BMI ⩾ 25 kg/m2 ( p < 0.001), documented CKD ( p < 0.001), baseline eGFR ⩽ 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 ( p < 0.001), and radical nephrectomy ( p < 0.001) were independent risk factors of lower eGFR at baseline and during follow-up. Average eGFR decreased within 3 months post nephrectomy. However, patients with different risk levels showed different eGFR time trend pattern at longer follow-ups. Multivariate analysis of time × risk factor interaction showed BMI, radical nephrectomy and baseline eGFR had time-dependent impact. BMI ⩾ 25 kg/m2 and radical nephrectomy were associated with steeper eGFR decrease slope. In baseline eGFR > 90 ml/min/1.73 m2 group, eGFR rebounded to pre-nephrectomy levels during extended follow-up. In partial nephrectomy patients with baseline eGFR ⩾ 90 ml/min/1.73 m2 ( n = 61), proteinuria ( p < 0.001) and BMI ( p < 0.001) were independent risk factors of decreased eGFR during follow up. Conclusions: As have been suggested by others and confirmed by our study, proteinuria and CKD are greatly under-recognized. Although self-evident as a minimum workup for nephrectomy patients to include SCr, eGFR, urinalysis, and proteinuria, the need for uniform applications of this practice should be reinforced. Non-neoplastic histology evaluation is valuable and should include an estimate of global sclerosis% (GS) and IFTA%. Patients with any proteinuria and/or eGFR ⩽ 60 at the time of nephrectomy or in follow-up with urologists, and/or >25% GS or IFTA, should be referred for early nephrology consultation.

The relationship between breast density change during menopause and the risk of breast cancer in Korean women

2021 ◽  
pp. canprevres.0542.2021
Author(s):  
Danbee Kang ◽  
Ji-Yeon Kim ◽  
Ji-Young Kim ◽  
Han Song Mun ◽  
Sook Ja Yoon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Density ◽  
Density Change ◽  
Korean Women ◽  
The Relationship

scholarly journals Risk of primary gastrointestinal cancers following incident non-metastatic breast cancer: a Danish population-based cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e000413
Author(s):  
Kasper Adelborg ◽  
Dóra Körmendiné Farkas ◽  
Jens Sundbøll ◽  
Lidia Schapira ◽  
Suzanne Tamang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Stomach Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Gastrointestinal Cancers ◽  
Increased Risk

ObjectiveWe examined the risk of primary gastrointestinal cancers in women with breast cancer and compared this risk with that of the general population.DesignUsing population-based Danish registries, we conducted a cohort study of women with incident non-metastatic breast cancer (1990–2017). We computed cumulative cancer incidences and standardised incidence ratios (SIRs).ResultsAmong 84 972 patients with breast cancer, we observed 2340 gastrointestinal cancers. After 20 years of follow-up, the cumulative incidence of gastrointestinal cancers was 4%, driven mainly by colon cancers. Only risk of stomach cancer was continually increased beyond 1 year following breast cancer. The SIR for colon cancer was neutral during 2–5 years of follow-up and approximately 1.2-fold increased thereafter. For cancer of the oesophagus, the SIR was increased only during 6–10 years. There was a weak association with pancreas cancer beyond 10 years. Between 1990–2006 and 2007–2017, the 1–10 years SIR estimate decreased and reached unity for upper gastrointestinal cancers (oesophagus, stomach, and small intestine). For lower gastrointestinal cancers (colon, rectum, and anal canal), the SIR estimate was increased only after 2007. No temporal effects were observed for the remaining gastrointestinal cancers. Treatment effects were negligible.ConclusionBreast cancer survivors were at increased risk of oesophagus and stomach cancer, but only before 2007. The risk of colon cancer was increased, but only after 2007.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document