Treatment of cancer of the anal canal. The Hamburg experience
14062 Background: To compare surgical and non-surgical treatment approaches for anal cancer and to identify prognostic factors. Methods: Survival data of 214 patients with cancer of the anal canal were reviewed who were referred for radiotherapy to the Department of Radiation Oncology of the University of Hamburg, Germany between 1/88 and 3/05. 75 patients received a definitive radiochemotherapy (RCT) with 5-FU and MMC according to international standards, 43 an operation followed by RCT (OP+RCT), 37 an operation followed by irradiation (OP+RT), 25 an irradiation alone (RT) and 34 an operation alone because they refused a planned adjuvant RCT or RT. The operations had been performed by different referring hospitals in and around Hamburg. Results: The median follow-up time of the living patients was 67 months (1–200 months). The 10 year overall survival rate for RCT was 0.62 (95%CI 0.46–0.77), for OP+RCT 0.65 (95%CI 0.47–0.83), for OP+RT 0.55 (95%CI 0.37–0.74), for OP alone 0.51 (95%CI 0.26–0.75) and for RT alone 0.27 (95%CI 0.05–0.48). There was no statistical difference between the overall survival of patients who received RCT, OP+RCT and OP+RT according to Kaplan Meier analysis (log rank test, p = 0.71). Cox regression analysis was used to examine the simultaneous influence of the prognostic factors T, N, age, haemoglobin concentration before radiotherapy, gender, and grading on the survival of patients who were treated with RCT. The model (p = 0.015) revealed T and N to be the only statistically significant prognostic factors. Conclusions: The different surgical and non-surgical approaches to treat cancer of the anal canal in Hamburg obviously reflect the individual preferences of the different physicians. Statistical analysis did not show a benefit of an OP added to RCT. Prognostic factors for survival after RCT were the T- and N-stage. No significant financial relationships to disclose.