Attitudes about chemotherapy for Japanese patients with or without cancer: Doctors, nurses, and the general public
17062 Background: A prospective survey in England demonstrated that patients with cancer were much more likely to accept radical treatment with minimal chance of benefit than people who did not have cancer (Slevin et al. Br Med J 1990; 300: 1458–60). We compared responses of Japanese patients with cancer with those of a control group of physicians, nurses, and patients without cancer in assessing personal cost-benefit of chemotherapy using the same questionnaire with Slevin's study. Methods: Subjects were asked with questionnaires whether of not to accept intensive and mild chemotherapy with a supposed minimum chance of effectiveness. 153 patients with cancer, 265 controls, 213 doctors, 397 nurses, and 51 patients without cancer were subjects of the study. Results: Percentage of subjects who accepted intensive chemotherapy with a supposed minimum chance of effectiveness (1% chance of cure, 3-month prolonging life, 1% relief of symptoms) by subject group were as follows: cancer patients; 62/55/52, doctors; 27/32/4, nurses; 11/12/5, non-cancer patients; 35/40/36, controls; 23/24/15, respectively. Conclusions: More patients with cancer than people without cancer accepted treatments giving the minimal benefit for cure, prolonging life or palliation of symptoms. Interestingly, the results in Japanese survey were similar to the previous study in England. No significant financial relationships to disclose.