Lack of evidence to support large-panel genomic testing in treatment selection for malignant melanoma.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22027-e22027
Author(s):  
Maya Dimitrova ◽  
Min Jae Kim ◽  
Douglas M. Donnelly ◽  
Keith M. Giles ◽  
Una Moran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Malignant Melanoma ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Treatment Selection ◽  
Genomic Profiling ◽  
First Line ◽  
Panel Size ◽  
Mutational Status ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Large Panel ◽  
The Impact

e22027 Background: Genomic profiling informs clinical decision-making for malignant melanoma (MM) as specific tumor mutations can be treated with targeted therapy (TT). However, given the range of different panel sizes available and increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), the clinical significance of upfront, large-panel genomic profiling in MM remains undetermined. Herein, we investigate the impact of panel size and targetable mutational status on first-line treatment selection and outcomes of MM patients from 9 different institutions. Methods: We analyzed data for 1,341 MM patients from 3 cohorts. Cohort 1 included 169 patients enrolled at NYULH and profiled with the 50 gene Ion Torrent panel (IT). Cohort 2 included 256 patients enrolled at MSKCC, profiled with the 400-gene MSK-IMPACT panel (MSK-I). Cohort 3 included 916 patients enrolled at 7 different sites, profiled with whole exome sequencing (WES). Data for cohorts 2 and 3 were extrapolated from publicly available data using cBioPortal. We tested associations between molecular data, treatment choice and overall survival (OS), adjusting for baseline characteristics when available. Results: Treatment information was available for 100%, 25%, and 0% of patients in cohort 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Stage was available for all of cohort 1 (III, n = 68; IV, n = 101) and cohort 2 (III, n = 2; IV, n = 254), but in only 23% of cohort 3 (III, n = 184; IV n = 25). For the IT and MSK-I, BRAF and NRAS were among the top 5 most commonly mutated genes, whereas for WES only BRAF was in the top 5. In cohort 1, 36% (16/45) of BRAF MUT patients received first-line TT vs 25% (66/256) in cohort 2. There was no significant difference for BRAF MUT patients treated with ICI vs. TT in cohort 1 in OS (P = 0.19), nor for BRAF MUT patients from cohort 1 treated with ICI vs. those from cohort 2 treated with TT (OS P = 0.762). Conclusions: Publicly available datasets provide population-level data, however the heterogeneity and deficiency of reported clinical information limits their value and calls for data standardization. Without evidence of clear clinical benefit of a larger panel size, there is a rationale for adopting smaller, more cost effective panels in MM.

Impact of KRAS mutational status on outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer (PDAC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4142-4142
Author(s):  
Lucy Xiaolu Ma ◽  
Gun Ho Jang ◽  
Amy Zhang ◽  
Robert Edward Denroche ◽  
Anna Dodd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Advanced Disease ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
First Line ◽  
Kras Mutations ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Mutational Status ◽  
Translational Research Program ◽  
The Impact

4142 Background: KRAS mutations (m) (KRASm) are present in over 90% of pancreatic adenocarcinomas (PDAC) with a predominance of G12 substitutions. KRAS wildtype (WT) PDAC relies on alternate oncogenic drivers, and the prognostic impact of these remains unknown. We evaluated alterations in WT PDAC and explored the impact of specific KRASm and WT status on survival. Methods: WGS and RNAseq were performed on 570 patients (pts) ascertained through our translational research program from 2012-2021, of which 443 were included for overall survival (OS) analyses. This included 176 pts with resected and 267 pts with advanced PDAC enrolled on the COMPASS trial (NCT02750657). The latter cohort underwent biopsies prior to treatment with first line gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel or mFOLFIRINOX as per physician choice. The Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods were used to estimate OS. Results: KRAS WT PDAC (n = 52) represented 9% of pts, and these cases trended to be younger than pts with KRASm (median age 61 vs 65 years p = 0.1). In resected cases, the most common alterations in WT PDAC (n = 23) included GNASm (n = 6) and BRAFm/fusions (n = 5). In advanced WT PDAC (n = 27), alterations in BRAF (n = 11) and ERBB2/3/4 (n = 6) were most prevalent. Oncogenic fusions (NTRK, NRG1, BRAF/RAF, ROS1, others) were identified in 9 pts. The BRAF in-frame deletion p.486_491del represented the most common single variant in WT PDAC, with organoid profiling revealing sensitivity to both 3rd generation BRAF inhibitors and MEK inhibition. In resected PDAC, multivariable analyses documented higher stage (p = 0.043), lack of adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.001), and the KRAS G12D variant (p = 0.004) as poor prognostic variables. In advanced disease, neither WT PDAC nor KRAS specific alleles had an impact on prognosis (median OS WT = 8.5 mths, G12D = 8.2, G12V = 10.0, G12R = 12.0, others = 9.2, p = 0.73); the basal-like RNA subtype conferred inferior OS (p < 0.001). A targeted therapeutic approach following first line chemotherapy was undertaken in 10% of pts with advanced PDAC: MMRd (n = 1), homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) (n = 19), KRASG12C (n = 1), CDK4/6 amplification (n = 3), ERBB family alterations (n = 2), BRAF variants (n = 2). OS in this group was superior (14.7 vs 8.8 mths, p = 0.04), mainly driven by HRD-PDAC where KRASm were present in 89%. Conclusions: In our dataset, KRAS G12D is associated with inferior OS in resected PDAC, however KRAS mutational status was not prognostic in advanced disease. This suggests that improved OS in the WT PDAC population can only be achieved if there is accelerated access to targeted drugs for pts.

Standardized Synoptic Cancer Pathology Reports — So What and Who Cares?: A Population-Based Satisfaction Survey of 970 Pathologists, Surgeons, and Oncologists

2013 ◽  
Vol 137 (11) ◽  
pp. 1599-1602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Lankshear ◽  
John Srigley ◽  
Thomas McGowan ◽  
Marta Yurcan ◽  
Carol Sawka
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Physician Satisfaction ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Cancer Pathology ◽  
Report Turnaround Time ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Pathology Reporting ◽  
The Impact

Context.—Cancer Care Ontario implemented synoptic pathology reporting across Ontario, impacting the practice of pathologists, surgeons, and medical and radiation oncologists. The benefits of standardized synoptic pathology reporting include enhanced completeness and improved consistency in comparison with narrative reports, with reported challenges including increased workload and report turnaround time. Objective.—To determine the impact of synoptic pathology reporting on physician satisfaction specific to practice and process. Design.—A descriptive, cross-sectional design was utilized involving 970 clinicians across 27 hospitals. An 11-item survey was developed to obtain information regarding timeliness, completeness, clarity, and usability. Open-ended questions were also employed to obtain qualitative comments. Results.—A 51% response rate was obtained, with descriptive statistics reporting that physicians perceive synoptic reports as significantly better than narrative reports. Correlation analysis revealed a moderately strong, positive relationship between respondents' perceptions of overall satisfaction with the level of information provided and perceptions of completeness for clinical decision making (r = 0.750, P &lt; .001) and ease of finding information for clinical decision making (r = 0.663, P &lt; .001). Dependent t tests showed a statistically significant difference in the satisfaction scores of pathologists and oncologists (t169 = 3.044, P = .003). Qualitative comments revealed technology-related issues as the most frequently cited factor impacting timeliness of report completion. Conclusion.—This study provides evidence of strong physician satisfaction with synoptic cancer pathology reporting as a clinical decision support tool in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of cancer patients.

scholarly journals Impact of collateralisation to a concomitant chronic total occlusion in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a subanalysis of the EXPLORE randomised controlled trial

Open Heart ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. e000810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivo M van Dongen ◽  
Joëlle Elias ◽  
K Gert van Houwelingen ◽  
Pierfrancesco Agostoni ◽  
Bimmer E P M Claessen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
St Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
St Elevation ◽  
The Impact

ObjectiveThe impact on cardiac function of collaterals towards a concomitant chronic total coronary occlusion (CTO) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has not been investigated yet. Therefore, we have evaluated the impact of well-developed collaterals compared with poorly developed collaterals to a concomitant CTO in STEMI.Methods and resultsIn the EXPLORE trial, patients with STEMI and a concomitant CTO were randomised to either CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or no-CTO PCI. Collateral grades were scored angiographically using the Rentrop grade classification. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) at 4 months were measured using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Well-developed collaterals (Rentrop grades 2–3) to the CTO were present in 162 (54%) patients; these patients had a significantly higher LVEF at 4 months (46.2±11.4% vs 42.1±12.7%, p=0.004) as well as a trend for a lower LVEDV (208.2±55.7 mL vs 222.6±68.5 mL, p=0.054) when compared with patients with poorly developed collaterals to the CTO. There was no significant difference in the total amount of scar in the two groups. Event rates were statistically comparable between patients with well-developed collaterals and poorly developed collaterals to the CTO at long-term follow-up.ConclusionsIn patients with STEMI and a concomitant CTO, the presence of well-developed collaterals to a concomitant CTO is associated with a better LVEF at 4 months. However, this effect on LVEF did not translate into improvement in clinical outcome. Therefore, the presence of well-developed collaterals is important, but should not solely guide in the clinical decision-making process regarding any additional revascularisation of a concomitant CTO in patients with STEMI.Clinical trial registrationNTR1108.

A New Cytokine-Based Stratification Is Highly Predictive of Survivals in AML Patients

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1412-1412
Author(s):  
Pierre Peterlin ◽  
Joelle Gaschet ◽  
Thierry Guillaume ◽  
Alice Garnier ◽  
Marion Eveillard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
First Line ◽  
Serum Samples ◽  
Gm Csf ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: Recently, a significant impact of the kinetics of Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand concentration (FLc) during induction (day[D]1 to D22) has been reported on survivals in first-line acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients (pts) (Peterlin et al, 2019). Three different FLc profiles were disclosed i) sustained increase of FLc (FLI group, good-risk), ii) increase from D1 to D15, then decrease at D22 (FLD group, intermediate-risk) and iii) stagnation of low levels (&lt;1000 pg/mL, FLL group, high-risk). An update of this prospective monocentric study (www.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02693899) is presented here evaluating also retrospectively the impact on outcomes of 6 other cytokine level profiles during induction. Methods: Between 05/2016 and 01/2018, 62 AML pts at diagnosis (median age 59 yo [29-71], &lt;60 yo n=33) eligible for first intensive induction were included and provided informed consent. They received standard of care first-line chemotherapy. Serum samples collected on D1, 8, 15 & 22 of induction were frozen-stored until performing ELISA for FL, TNFa, SCF, IL-1b, IL-6, IL-10, GM-CSF. Normal values were assessed in 5 healthy controls. Pts outcomes considered were relapse/leukemia-free (LFS) and overall (OS) survivals. Results: FLI, FLD and FLL profiles were observed for 26, 22 and 14 pts respectively. A total of 372 samples were assayed for the 6 other cytokines. Median concentrations at D1, D8, D15, D22 for these 6 cytokines were as follows, considering the whole cohort (and healthy donors): TNFa: 0.53, 0, 0, 0 (0); SCF: 5.91, 0, 0, 0 (3); IL-1b : 0, 0, 0, 0 (0); IL-6: 4.85, 16.28, 10.11, 7.1 (0), IL-10: 0, 0, 0, 0 (0) and GM-CSF:1.63, 1.8, 0.67, 1.34 (9.98). Median IL-6 and GM-CSF levels, compared to healthy controls, were respectively higher and lower during induction. No significant difference was observed in terms of median cytokine concentrations at any time when comparing the three FL sub-groups or FLI vs FLD pts. With a median follow-up of 28 months (range: 17-37), FLI and FLD pts show now similar 2-y LFS (62.9% vs 59%, p=0.63) and OS (69.2% vs 63.6%, p=0.70). FLL pts have a significantly higher rate of relapse (85,7% vs FLI 19,2% vs FLD 32%, p=0,0001). Comparing FLL vs FLI+FLD pts disclosed significantly different LFS (7.1% vs 61.1%, p&lt;0.001) but not OS (36.7% vs 66.6%, p=0.11). In univariate analysis, 2y LFS and OS were not affected by the concentration (&lt; or &gt; median) of the 7 cytokines studied except for LFS and GM-CSFc at D8 (p=0,04) and D15 (p=0,08), for LFS and FLc at D1 (p=0.06), D8 (p=0,03), D15 (p=0,04) and D22 (p=0,03) and for OS and GM-CSF at D15 (p=0.08). A significant association between LFS was observed with ELN 2017 risk stratification (2-y LFS: favorable: 68,1% vs intermediate: 48,1% vs unfavorable: 30,7%, p=0.03) but not OS (2 y: 77% vs 55,5% vs 46,1%, p=0.09). Multivariate analysis showed that no factor was independently associated with OS while LFS remained significantly associated with the FLc profile (FLL vs others, HR: 5.79. 95%CI: 2.48-13.53, p&lt;0.0001) and GM-CSF at D15 (HR: 0.45; 95%CI: 0.20-0.98, p=0.04) but not with ELN 2017 risk stratification (p=0.06). Cytokine levels were then assessed to try to better discriminate FLI and FLD pts. A significant higher IL-6 level at D22 was found in relapsed or deceased FLI/FLD pts (median:15,34 vs 5,42 pg/mL, p=0,04). FLI/FLD pts with low IL-6 at D22 (&lt; median, 15.5 pg/mL, n=35 vs n=14 with high level) had significant better 2y LFS and OS (74,2% vs 38,4%, p=0,005 and 77,1% vs 38,4%, p=0,009, respectively). A new prognostic risk-stratification could thus be proposed, i.e. FLI/FLD with IL-6 &lt;15.5 pg/mL (favorable), FLI/FLD with IL-6 &gt;15.5 pg/mL (intermediate) and FLL (unfavorable). This new classification was considered for a second multivariate analysis, showing that it is the strongest factor associated with OS (p=0.006, ELN p=0.03, FL profile p=0.04) and LFS (p&lt;0.0001, ELN p=0.005, GM-CSFc D15 p=0.03) (figure 1). Conclusion: This study confirms stagnation of low FLc during AML induction as a strong poor prognosis factor. Moreover, IL-6 levels at D22 further discriminate FLI/FLD pts. Thus, a new cytokine-based risk-stratification integrating FL kinetics and IL-6 levels during induction may help to better predict outcomes in first-line AML patients. These results need to be validated on a larger cohort of AML patients while anti-IL-6 therapy should be tested in combination with standard 3+7 chemotherapy. Figure 1 Disclosures Peterlin: AbbVie Inc: Consultancy; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy. Moreau:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Chevallier:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria.

Outcome of Treatment with Fludarabine Versus Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Is Adversely Impacted by High Risk Genetic Features: Results from ECOG 2997.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 3487-3487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Grever ◽  
David M. Lucas ◽  
Gordon W. Dewald ◽  
Donna S. Neuberg ◽  
Ian W. Flinn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
P53 Mutation ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
P53 Mutations ◽  
Interphase Cytogenetics ◽  
Molecular Features ◽  
Mutational Status ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Several prognostic factors including un-mutated VH mutational status, select interphase cytogenetic abnormalities [del(11q22.3), del(17p13.1)] and p53 mutations have been associated with shorter interval time from diagnosis to symptomatic disease requiring treatment, shortened progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Limited prospective data exists relative to the relevance of these biologic markers on PFS following treatment with modern therapies for CLL. E2997 is a randomized phase III trial of 278 previously untreated, symptomatic CLL patients who received fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (FC) versus fludarabine (F). We analyzed the response rates and PFS of the patients for whom interphase cytogenetics, VH mutational status, and p53 mutational status studies have been completed. FC therapy had a higher complete response (CR) (23% versus 5%, p<0.002), overall response [OR] (73% versus 50%, p<0.002), and median PFS (33.5 months versus 15 months, p<.0001) as compared to F. The CR and OR was not different based upon interphase cytogenetics or VH mutational status for the entire group of patients or when analyzed by arm of treatment. However, the OR for pts with del(17) or p53 mutations was lower in both the FC arm (69%, versus 76% in patients with normal p53) and F arm (27%, versus 54% in normal p53). Using the Dohner hierarchical classification [del(17p)>del(11q)>del(6q)>tri12>normal> del(13q14)], the relationship of interphase cytogenetics, VH mutational status and p53 mutational status with PFS is summarized below: Median PFS on FC (months) Median PFS on F (months) NR = median not reached; p53 mut+ = mutation present del(17p) 11.9 8.2 del(11q) 30.6 12.8 del(6q) 26.9 26.7 tri 12 NR 20.3 normal NR 11.2 del(13q) NR 21.2 del(17p)/p53 mut+ 11.9 8.9 no del(17p)/p53 mut+ NR 17.8 VH<98% NR 21.2 VH>98% 21.4 13.4 Using the interphase cytogenetic groups, there was a significant difference in PFS for both the FC (p=0.04) and F (p=0.01) treatment arms. Similarly, the presence of a p53 mutation or deletion [del(17p)] predicted for shorter PFS for both FC (p=0.005) and F (p=0.02) therapies. PFS did not statistically differ among VH mutational groups for either arm. We next investigated a Cox proportional hazards analysis to assess the impact of multiple molecular features and treatment arm on PFS. Treatment with F (hazard ratio 3.14, p<0.0001), presence of del(17p) or p53 mutation (hazard ratio 3.13, p=0.0001), and presence of del(11q) (hazard ratio 2.067, p=0.019) were highly significant in the model. Finally, VH unmutated status and del(11q) were highly associated. In conclusion, our data demonstrate that high risk genomic features including p53 mutations, del(17p), and del(11q) are highly predictive of shortened PFS. Our data provide support for a risk-stratified therapy approach for the treatment of CLL.

Subanalysis of the StiL NHL 1–2003 Study: Achievement of Complete Response with Bendamustine-Rituximab (B-R) and CHOP-R in the First-Line Treatment of Indolent and Mantle Cell Lymphomas Results in Superior Survival Compared to Partial Response.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2724-2724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathias J. Rummel ◽  
Norbert Niederle ◽  
Georg Maschmeyer ◽  
G.-Andre Banat ◽  
Ulrich von Grünhagen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Complete Response ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Female Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Male Patients ◽  
The Impact ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Abstract 2724 Background: The NHL 1 study, a prospective, multicenter, randomized, phase 3 study which compared B-R and CHOP-R as first-line treatment in indolent lymphomas and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), demonstrated a significant benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) as well as improved tolerability for B-R compared with CHOP-R. Here we present an analysis of the impact of response quality on outcome. Methods: 514 patients (pts) with indolent or MCL were randomized to receive B-R or CHOP-R for a maximum of 6 cycles. Results: The overall response rate in the 514 pts (261 B-R; 253 CHOP-R) was 92.7% and 91.3% in the B-R and CHOP-R arms, respectively (as presented at the last ASCO meeting, J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl; abstr 3). A complete response (CR) was observed in 39.8% in the B-R arm and in 30% in the CHOP-R arm (p=0.021). The achievement of CR was associated with a significantly prolonged PFS and overall survival (OS) (Table 1). Analysis by treatment arm revealed a trend for superior PFS and a significantly improved OS for patients achieving CR following treatment with B-R. In the CHOP-R arm, patients in CR had a significantly superior PFS compared to those in PR with a trend to superior OS. Regardless of the quality of response, PFS was superior with B-R versus CHOP-R: For patients in CR, the median PFS was not reached with B-R, whereas for CHOP-R it was 53.7 months (p=0.0204). In patients achieving PR, treatment with B-R resulted in a median PFS of 57.2 months, and this was 30.9 months with CHOP-R (p=0.0002). We noted a statistically significant difference in CR rates between male (n=272, median age 63 years) and female (n=242, median age 64 years) patients. The CR rate was 28.6% in male patients and 42.1% in female patients (p=0.0016). Female patients had a longer median PFS (51.4 months) compared to male patients (38.6 months), however, this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.0866). Conclusions: Patients in CR following first-line treatment in our study had a significantly longer PFS and OS compared to those achieving a PR. Therefore, our results strongly suggest an association between quality of response and outcome. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Predictive Value Of Early Molecular Responses In Outcomes Of Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treated With Imatinib In First-Line Therapy

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4941-4941
Author(s):  
Katia B. Pagnano ◽  
Bruna Vergilio ◽  
Eliana C M Miranda ◽  
Marcia Torresan Delamain ◽  
Maria Helena De Almeida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
First Line ◽  
Molecular Responses ◽  
Advanced Phase ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Several studies demonstrated the prognostic significance of an early molecular response in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients (pts) treated with imatinib in first line or other tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of early molecular responses, at 3 and 6 months after treatment with imatinib in CML pts and correlate these responses with CCR, MMR, overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS). Patients and Methods Between February 2006 and June 2012, 95  adult pts with newly diagnosed CML in chronic phase (CP) received imatinib 400mg/daily. CP was defined using WHO 2008 criteria. All pts received a short course of hydroxiurea until imatinib was available. Cytogenetic analysis was performed at diagnosis, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months after starting therapy and then every 12-24 months thereafter. BCR-ABL transcripts were measured in peripheral blood at 3-month intervals using quantitative RT-PCR (RQ-PCR). Results were expressed as BCR-ABL/ABL ratio, with conversion to the international scale (IS). Major molecular response (MMR) was defined as a transcript level ≤ 0.1% (IS). Statistical analysis: OS was measured from imatinib start until date of death or last visit. An event was defined as death from any cause. EFS was measured from imatinib start until the first event (loss of complete hematological response (CHR); complete cytogenetic response (CCR), progression to advanced phase, death or imatinib discontinuation) or last visit. OS and EFS rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test to compare its curves. The MMR probabilities according to molecular responses at 3 and 6 months were calculated by c2 method and cumulative incidence, considering as competitive event death or progression, before the event. Results 95 pts were analyzed, 57 (60%) male, with a median age of 47 years (17-79); Sokal score: high, intermediate and low was 30, 38.6 and 31.4% respectively; EUTOS scores was 81.5% low and 18.5% high. The median time from diagnosis until imatinib therapy was 1 month (0-5) and the follow-up was 39 month (3-89). Responses: 88% achieved CHR; 50% CCR and 53% MMR. One patient progressed to advanced phase during follow-up, while on imatinib treatment. 21 (22%) pts discontinued imatinib due to intolerance (47.6%); resistance (42.9%), death (4.8%) and Allo-HSCT (4.8%). At 3 months from the start of therapy, 30/64 (46.8%) achieved CCR, 15/64 (23.4%) partial cytogenetic response and 20/64 (31.2%) less than partial; by RQ-PCR, 72.3% (68/94) achieved at 3 months BCR-ABL transcripts ≤10% and 27.7% (26/94) > 10%. At 6 months 55.2% (48/87) had BCR-ABL transcripts ≤ 1% and 44.8% (39/87) >1%. The OS was 97% (95%CI: 95-99%) and EFS 63% (95%CI: 52-75%).There was no significant difference in OS and EFS in pts with RQ-PCR > 10% vs ≤ 10% at 3 months (figure 1), but pts with BCR-ABL transcripts > 10 and >1-10% at 6 months had an inferior EFS in comparison with pts with  BCR-ABL transcripts ≤ 1%  (41%,50%,89% respectively - p= 0.005), (figure 2). The CI showed that CCR pts at 3 months reached MMR earlier at 24 month (54% vs 18%, p=0.03), as well as CCR pts at 6 months, albeit no significance statistically (52% vs 37%, p= 0.16). For RQ-PCR at 3 months, pts with BCR-ABL transcripts 0-1% had a probability of 88% to achieve MMR, 1-10% had 52% and >10% 42%, p< 0.0001 (figure 3). In conclusion, our results show that early molecular responses are predictive of achieving MMR and BCR-ABL transcripts <1% at 6 months is predictive of EFS in CP-CML treated with imatinib. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Impact of gemcitabine (G) on the activity of first-line chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A meta-analysis

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7138-7138
Author(s):  
G. L. Pappagallo ◽  
O. Belvedere ◽  
O. Vinante ◽  
F. Grossi
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Third Generation ◽  
First Line ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

7138 Background: A two-drug platinum-based regimen in which cisplatin or carboplatin is combined with a third-generation agent (i.e. paclitaxel, vinorelbine, docetaxel, or G) is the standard first-line treatment for NSCLC patients with good performance status. Encouraging results have recently been reported for nonplatinum regimens composed of two third-generation drugs. Methods: To assess the impact of G on the activity of first-line chemotherapy in NSCLC, we carried out a meta-analysis on data from 4,362 NSCLC patients who were enrolled in 11 randomized trials comparing a G-containing vs. G-free new generation regimens. We constructed 2x2 tables using response to treatment data. For trials with more than one eligible G-free comparator arm, individual comparisons between the G-based treatment arms and each of the comparator arms were analyzed. A general variance-based method was used to estimate the pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). We assessed for heterogeneity among the trials based on standard methods. Results: Sixteen comparisons contributed to this analysis. G-containing regimens included: G+cisplatin (894), G+docetaxel (565), G+paclitaxel (200 patients), G+vinorelbine (157), G+carboplatin (49). G-free regimens included: vinorelbine+cisplatin (866), carboplatin+paclitaxel (539), docetaxel+cisplatin (494), cisplatin+paclitaxel (439), vinorelbine+carboplatin (159). Comparing G-containing vs. G-free regimens, the OR for progression was 0.867 (CI 95% 0.770–0.977; p = 0.019), with heterogeneity chi-square 11.639 (p = 0.71). No significant difference was observed for complete (OR 0.909, CI 95% 0.556–1.487; P = 0.707) and overall (complete + partial) response (OR 0.987, CI 95% 0.881–1.106; P = 0.819). Conclusions: These data demonstrate that the progression of disease is more likely in patients treated with G-free doublets. Further analyses are required to address whether disease control (objective response + stable disease) is associated with a survival benefit and may therefore be used as a surrogate end point for survival in chemotherapy trials of NSCLC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Clinical characteristics of KRAS mutations in NSCLC and their impact on outcomes to first-line chemotherapy.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7588-7588
Author(s):  
Mohit Butaney ◽  
Jennifer Porter ◽  
Neal Ian Lindeman ◽  
Pasi A. Janne ◽  
Michael S. Rabin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Smoking Status ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Limited Information ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
First Line ◽  
Kras Mutations ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

7588 Background: KRAS is one of the most commonly mutated oncogenes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While the impact of EGFR mutations and EML4-alk translocations has been well-described, there is limited information about the impact of these somatic mutations on response to chemotherapy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the demographics and clinical outcomes of patients with KRAS mutations and compared these to patients who were KRAS wild-type (WT). Eligible pts received 1st-line IV chemo for stage IV NSCLC at DFCI and had known information about both KRAS and EGFR status. Since the biology and impact of EGFR mutations on response to chemo is well-described, we excluded such pts from the analysis. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) with first-line chemo; secondary endpoints included radiographic response rate (RR) and overall survival (OS). Results: Between 2/05 and 8/11, there were 63 eligible KRAS pts and 97 eligible WT pts. The groups were similar in age (median 65yrs in both groups), % female (K 62, WT 54) race (K 89% white/6% black, 5% other; WT 86% white,/6% black/8% other), histology (K 90%adeno/8% NSCLC NOS; WT 86% adeno/9%NSCLC NOS), and % of pts receiving 1/2/3 agents in 1st line (K 11/56/33; WT 18/53/30). KRAS pts were less likely to be never or light smokers (4% vs 33% for WT). Nonsmokers were more likely to harbor KRAS transition rather than transversion mutations (3 transition, 1 transversion), while the converse held for smokers (51 transversions, 8 transitions). Median PFS was similar for KRAS vs WT (K .65 vs WT 4.8 months, p=0.81). RR (29% for both groups), disease control rates (K 73% vs WT 78%), and median OS (K 13.5 vs WT 12.1 months, p=.525) were also similar. Outcomes of KRAS pts to 2nd line chemotherapy (PFS 2.2, OS 8.6) are similar to those seen for WT patients in this setting. There was no significant difference in outcomes based on gender, smoking status, drug received (pemetrexed-based vs taxane based), or specific KRAS genotype. Conclusions: Pts with KRAS mutations experience similar outcomes to standard chemotherapy as those who are wild-type for EGFR and KRAS. Going forward, these data can serve as a reference for control arms of KRAS-specific randomized trials.

ERCC1, KRAS mutation, redox status, and oxaliplatin sensitivity in colorectal cancer: “Radical” change in an old model.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14156-e14156
Author(s):  
Armando Orlandi ◽  
Mariantonietta Di Salvatore ◽  
Michele Basso ◽  
Cinzia Bagalà ◽  
Antonia Strippoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oxidative Stress ◽  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Redox Status ◽  
Mutational Status ◽  
Retrospective Clinical Study ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

e14156 Background: Oxaliplatin (Oxa) is widely used in metastatic colorectal cancer, but currently there are not valid predictors of response to this drug. In our recent retrospective clinical study we have shown a greater efficacy of Oxa in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with mutated (mt) K-RAS. We hypothesized that the mutational status of K-RAS could influence the expression of ERCC1 and cellular Redox status. Methods: We used four cell lines of colorectal cancer: two K-RAS wild type (wt) (HCT-8, HT-29) and two K-RAS mt (SW620, SW480). We evaluated the sensitivity of these cell lines to Oxa by MTT-test and the ERCC1 levels before and after 24h exposure to Oxa by RT-PCR. We silenced K-RAS in a K-RAS mt cell lines to evaluate the impact on Oxa sensitivity and ERCC1 levels. We also silenced ERCC1 in order to confirm the importance of this protein as a Oxa resistance factor. Cellular oxidative stress was determined by DCFDA. Results: The K-RAS mt cell lines were more sensitive to Oxa (p<0.001). The basal levels of ERCC1 did not show significant differences between K-RAS mt and wt cell line, however, after 24h exposure to Oxa, only the K-RAS wt lines showed the ability to induce ERCC1, with a statistically significant difference (p<0.005). The silencing of K-RAS in K-RAS mt cell lines (SW620s) demonstrated to reduce sensitivity to Oxa associated with the acquisition of the ability to induce ERCC1. The silencing of ERCC1 in K-RAS wt cell lines enhance the sensibility to Oxa. The levels of reactive oxygen species were higher in K-RAS mt cell lines. The Pearson correlation test showed a statistically significant relationship between basal levels of ROS and sensitivity to Oxa ("r" -0,988, p<0.01). The baseline levels of ROS were higher SW620 than the line SW620s. The administration of Oxa in these cell lines resulted in a statistically higher fluorescence index in SW620 versus SW620s (p<0.003). Conclusions: The K-RAS mutated cell lines were more sensitive to Oxa. This feature seems to be secondary to the inability of these cells to induce ERCC1 after exposure to Oxa and to the synergism between K-RAS mutation and Oxa in increasing oxidative stress. K-RAS can thus be a predictor of response to Oxa in colorectal cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document