SARS-CoV-2 is associated with high viral loads in asymptomatic and recently symptomatic healthcare workers

Background Healthcare workers (HCW) are at increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection from both patients and other HCW with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values of SARS-CoV-2 ≤ 34 and the first 7–9 days of symptoms are associated with enhanced infectivity. We determined Ct values and duration of symptoms of HCW with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test. As HCW often assume their greatest risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 is working on a COVID-19 unit, we also determined Ct values and symptom duration of inpatients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test. Methods From 6/24/2020-8/23/2020, Ct values and duration of symptoms from 13 HCW, 12 outpatients, and 28 inpatients who had a positive nasopharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2 were analyzed. Results Among HCW with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test, 46.2% (6/13) were asymptomatic and requested testing due to an exposure to someone with COVID-19; 83.3% (5/6) of those exposures occurred in the community rather than in the hospital. The median Ct value of HCW was 23.2, and 84.6% (11/13) had a Ct value ≤ 34. The median Ct value of 29.0 among outpatients with COVID-19 did not significantly differ from HCW. In contrast, inpatients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test had a median Ct value of 34.0 (p = 0.003), which translated into a median ~1,000-fold lower viral load than observed in HCW. Among those with symptoms related to COVID-19, no (0/6) HCW compared to 50% (6/12) of inpatients had symptoms for at least one week (p = 0.04). Conclusions At our institution, asymptomatic COVID-19 accounted for nearly half of the cases among HCW. Symptomatic HCW had high viral loads and short duration of symptoms, both of which are associated with peak infectivity. Infection prevention programs should educate HCW on these findings in an effort to increase adherence to the requirement to maintain six feet separation in workspaces and breakrooms, in addition to consistently wearing personal protection equipment.

Download Full-text

First Dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Reduces Symptom Duration and Viral Clearance in Healthcare Workers

Vaccines ◽

10.3390/vaccines9060659 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 (6) ◽

pp. 659

Author(s):

Luca Coppeta ◽

Ottavia Balbi ◽

Zaira Grattagliano ◽

Grazia Genga Mina ◽

Antonio Pietroiusti ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Incidence Rate ◽

Healthcare Workers ◽

Central Italy ◽

Viral Clearance ◽

Post Exposure Prophylaxis ◽

Symptom Duration ◽

Rt Pcr ◽

Dose Administration ◽

Duration Of Symptoms ◽

The Impact

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has infected more than one hundred million people since the beginning of the worldwide pandemic. In this study, data from a large hospital in central Italy was used to evaluate the impact of the first dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine on SARS-CoV-2 infections in terms of the prevalence of symptomatic cases, symptom duration, and viral clearance timing. All vaccinated Healthcare Workers (HCWs) with positive RT-PCR by nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs were divided into two cohorts (positive RT-PCR within day 12 and positive RT-PCR between day 13 and day 21 after first dose administration) and compared for the presence and duration of symptoms and the timing of viral clearance. The same variables were evaluated across HCWs with positive RT-PCR within 6 days after first dose administration and non-vaccinated HCWs with positive RT-PCR between 1 October 2020 and 28 February 2021. Eighteen HCWs tested positive on RT-PCR by NP swab from day 1 to day 12 after the 1st dose administration (incidence rate 6.2 × 10−4) and 5 HCWs from day 13 to day 21 (incidence rate 2.3 × 10−4). Symptom duration and viral clearance timing are significantly shorter in the cohort of HCWs with positive RT-PCR 12 days after the first dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. The administration of the first dose proved effective in reducing presence, symptom duration, and viral clearance even in HCWs vaccinated for less than 6 days. These results could have implications on public health and post-exposure prophylaxis.

Download Full-text

Equivalent SARS-CoV-2 viral loads by PCR between nasopharyngeal swab and saliva in symptomatic patients

Scientific Reports ◽

10.1038/s41598-021-84059-2 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Isao Yokota ◽

Takeshi Hattori ◽

Peter Y. Shane ◽

Satoshi Konno ◽

Atsushi Nagasaka ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Symptom Onset ◽

Diagnostic Tool ◽

Healthcare Workers ◽

Detection Sensitivity ◽

Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽

Cycle Threshold ◽

Viral Loads ◽

Ct Value ◽

High Degree ◽

Over Time

AbstractEmerging evidences have shown the utility of saliva for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 by PCR as alternative to nasopharyngeal swab (NPS). However, conflicting results have been reported regarding viral loads between NPS and saliva. We conducted a study to compare the viral loads between NPS and saliva in 42 COVID-19 patients. Viral loads were estimated by the cycle threshold (Ct) values. SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 34 (81%) using NPS with median Ct value of 27.4, and 38 (90%) using saliva with median Ct value of 28.9 (P = 0.79). Kendall’s W was 0.82, showing a high degree of agreement, indicating equivalent viral loads in NPS and saliva. After symptom onset, the Ct values of both NPS and saliva continued to increase over time, with no substantial difference. Self-collected saliva has a detection sensitivity comparable to that of NPS and is a useful diagnostic tool with mitigating uncomfortable process and the risk of aerosol transmission to healthcare workers.

Download Full-text

SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and asymptomatic viral carriage in healthcare workers: a cross-sectional study

Thorax ◽

10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215414 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 75 (12) ◽

pp. 1089-1094 ◽

Cited By ~ 22

Author(s):

Adrian Shields ◽

Sian E Faustini ◽

Marisol Perez-Toledo ◽

Sian Jossi ◽

Erin Aldera ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Intensive Care ◽

Healthcare Workers ◽

Venous Blood ◽

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽

Sectional Study ◽

University Hospitals ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

General Internal ◽

Increased Risk

ObjectiveTo determine the rates of asymptomatic viral carriage and seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in healthcare workers.DesignA cross-sectional study of asymptomatic healthcare workers undertaken on 24/25 April 2020.SettingUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (UHBFT), UK.Participants545 asymptomatic healthcare workers were recruited while at work. Participants were invited to participate via the UHBFT social media. Exclusion criteria included current symptoms consistent with COVID-19. No potential participants were excluded.InterventionParticipants volunteered a nasopharyngeal swab and a venous blood sample that were tested for SARS-CoV-2 RNA and anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein antibodies, respectively. Results were interpreted in the context of prior illnesses and the hospital departments in which participants worked.Main outcome measureProportion of participants demonstrating infection and positive SARS-CoV-2 serology.ResultsThe point prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 viral carriage was 2.4% (n=13/545). The overall seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was 24.4% (n=126/516). Participants who reported prior symptomatic illness had higher seroprevalence (37.5% vs 17.1%, χ2=21.1034, p<0.0001) and quantitatively greater antibody responses than those who had remained asymptomatic. Seroprevalence was greatest among those working in housekeeping (34.5%), acute medicine (33.3%) and general internal medicine (30.3%), with lower rates observed in participants working in intensive care (14.8%). BAME (Black, Asian and minority ethnic) ethnicity was associated with a significantly increased risk of seropositivity (OR: 1.92, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.23, p=0.01). Working on the intensive care unit was associated with a significantly lower risk of seropositivity compared with working in other areas of the hospital (OR: 0.28, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.78, p=0.02).Conclusions and relevanceWe identify differences in the occupational risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 between hospital departments and confirm asymptomatic seroconversion occurs in healthcare workers. Further investigation of these observations is required to inform future infection control and occupational health practices.

Download Full-text

The management of surgical patients in the emergency setting during COVID-19 pandemic: the WSES position paper

World Journal of Emergency Surgery ◽

10.1186/s13017-021-00349-0 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 16 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Belinda De Simone ◽

Elie Chouillard ◽

Massimo Sartelli ◽

Walter L. Biffl ◽

Salomone Di Saverio ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Emergency Surgery ◽

Healthcare Workers ◽

Mass Casualty ◽

Position Paper ◽

Surgical Patients ◽

Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽

Emergency Setting ◽

Open Approach ◽

Rt Pcr

Abstract Background Since the COVID-19 pandemic has occurred, nations showed their unpreparedness to deal with a mass casualty incident of this proportion and severity, which resulted in a tremendous number of deaths even among healthcare workers. The World Society of Emergency Surgery conceived this position paper with the purpose of providing evidence-based recommendations for the management of emergency surgical patients under COVID-19 pandemic for the safety of the patient and healthcare workers. Method A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) through the MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase and SCOPUS databases. Synthesis of evidence, statements and recommendations were developed in accordance with the GRADE methodology. Results Given the limitation of the evidence, the current document represents an effort to join selected high-quality articles and experts’ opinion. Conclusions The aim of this position paper is to provide an exhaustive guidelines to perform emergency surgery in a safe and protected environment for surgical patients and for healthcare workers under COVID-19 and to offer the best management of COVID-19 patients needing for an emergency surgical treatment. We recommend screening for COVID-19 infection at the emergency department all acute surgical patients who are waiting for hospital admission and urgent surgery. The screening work-up provides a RT-PCR nasopharyngeal swab test and a baseline (non-contrast) chest CT or a chest X-ray or a lungs US, depending on skills and availability. If the COVID-19 screening is not completed we recommend keeping the patient in isolation until RT-PCR swab test result is not available, and to manage him/she such as an overt COVID patient. The management of COVID-19 surgical patients is multidisciplinary. If an immediate surgical procedure is mandatory, whether laparoscopic or via open approach, we recommend doing every effort to protect the operating room staff for the safety of the patient.

Download Full-text

POS1120 PRESENCE OF TOPHI IS ASSOCIATED WITH A RAPID DECLINE IN THE RENAL FUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH GOUT

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.50 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 839.1-839

Author(s):

Y. J. Oh ◽

K. W. Moon

Keyword(s):

Renal Function ◽

Renal Dysfunction ◽

Clinical Characteristics ◽

Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis ◽

Joint Involvement ◽

Rapid Decline ◽

Symptom Duration ◽

Tophaceous Gout ◽

Duration Of Symptoms ◽

Increased Risk

Background:Gout is the most common inflammatory arthritis resulting from a chronic deposition of MSU crystals in the joints and other soft tissues. After the process of repeated tissue damage and repair due to gout, tophi could be formed around the affected joints. Intra-articular tophi may sometimes result in bone destruction, joint deformities, and dysfunction which can adversely affect the patient’s quality of life. Furthermore, early-onset tophaceous gout patients are more likely to develop renal dysfunction, however, few studies have investigated if the presence of tophi is related with the progression of renal dysfunction in gout patients.Objectives:We aimed to compare clinical characteristics of patients with and without tophi at the time of the diagnosis of gout and investigate the effect of tophi on the renal function in gout patients.Methods:Data of 257 patients who were first diagnosed with gout at the Kangwon National University Hospital from January 2012 to December 2018 were retrospectively studied. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence of tophi at the diagnosis. We compared clinical characteristics and the progression of renal dysfunction between the two groups.Results:Of all patients, 66 (25.5%) initially presented with tophi. Patients with tophi were older, had a longer duration of symptoms, and had a higher prevalence of multiple joint involvement than those without tophi. The decline in the eGFR was more prominent in patients with tophi than in those without (-4.8±14.5 ml/min/1.73m2vs. -0.7±11.9 ml/min/1.73m2, respectively; P=0.039). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, a prolonged symptom duration (odds ratio [OR], 1.010; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.004–1.017; P=0.001) and multiple joint involvement (OR, 3.027; 95% CI, 1.831–5.004; P<0.001) were significantly associated with increased risk of formation of tophi. The presence of tophi was significantly associated with a rapid decline in the eGFR (β=-0.141; P=0.035).Conclusion:A prolonged symptom duration and multiple joint involvement were independent risk factors for tophi as the presenting symptom in gout patients. The presence of tophi was associated with a declining renal function. Therefore, an early diagnosis and active treatment are important in tophaceous gout.References:[1]Bardin T, Richette P. Definition of hyperuricemia and gouty conditions. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2014;26:186-91.[2]Liu F, Du GL, Song N, Ma YT, Li XM, Gao XM, et al. Hyperuricemia and its association with adiposity and dyslipidemia in Northwest China: results from cardiovascular risk survey in Xinjiang (CRS 2008-2012). Lipids Health Dis 2020;19:58.[3]Dalbeth N, Merriman TR, Stamp LK. Gout. Lancet 2016;388:2039-52.[4]Ruoff G, Edwards NL. Overview of Serum Uric Acid Treatment Targets in Gout: Why Less Than 6 mg/dL? Postgrad Med 2016;128:706-15.[5]Bieber A, Schlesinger N, Fawaz A, Mader R. Chronic tophaceous gout as the first manifestation of gout in two cases and a review of the literature. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2018;47:843-8.Disclosure of Interests:None declared.

Download Full-text

Eastern Cape Healthcare Workers Acquisition of SARS-CoV-2 (ECHAS): Cross-Sectional (Nested Cohort) Study Protocol

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ◽

10.3390/ijerph18010323 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 18 (1) ◽

pp. 323

Author(s):

Oladele Vincent Adeniyi ◽

David Stead ◽

Mandisa Singata-Madliki ◽

Joanne Batting ◽

Leo Hyera ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cohort Study ◽

Infection Rate ◽

Healthcare Workers ◽

Health Facilities ◽

Control Measures ◽

Infection Prevention And Control ◽

Eastern Cape ◽

Rt Pcr ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Increased Risk

Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at increased risk of infection by the virulent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Though data exist on the positivity rate of the SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test as well as COVID-19-related deaths amongst HCWs in South Africa, the overall infection rate remains underestimated by these indicators. It is also unclear whether the humoral immune response after SARS-CoV-2 infection offers durable protection against reinfection. This study will assess the SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence amongst HCWs in the Eastern Cape (EC) and examine the longitudinal changes (rate of decay) in the antibody levels after infection in this cohort. Using a multi-stage cluster sampling of healthcare workers in selected health facilities in the EC, a cross-sectional study of 2250 participants will be recruited. In order to assess the community infection rate, 750 antenatal women in the same settings will be recruited. Relevant demographic and clinical characteristics will be obtained by a self-administered questionnaire. A chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) will be used for the qualitative detection of IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein. A nested cohort study will be conducted by performing eight-weekly antibody assays (X2) from 201 participants who tested positive for both SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR and serology. Logistic regression models will be fitted to identify the independent risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection. The cumulative SARS-CoV-2 infection rate and infection fatality rate among the frontline HCWs will be estimated. In addition, the study will highlight the overall effectiveness of infection prevention and control measures (IPC) per exposure sites/wards at the selected health facilities. Findings will inform the South African Department of Health’s policies on how to protect HCWs better as the country prepares for the second wave of the SARS-CoV pandemic.

Download Full-text

COVID-19 serological testing for Healthcare Workers in Lombardy, Italy

European Journal of Public Health ◽

10.1093/eurpub/ckaa165.351 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽

Author(s):

G Del Castillo ◽

A Castrofino ◽

F Grosso ◽

A Barone ◽

L Crottogini ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Healthcare Workers ◽

Geographical Area ◽

Healthcare Facility ◽

Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽

Infection Prevalence ◽

Serological Testing ◽

Prevention Policy ◽

Rt Pcr ◽

Serological Tests ◽

Screening Process

Abstract Issue COVID-19 pandemic began in Italy on February 20th, 2020. Since the beginning of the emergency Healthcare Workers' (HCWs) involvement was prominent, mainly due to direct assistance to COVID-19 patients. Therefore, we implemented a prevention policy for HCW screening through serological and RT-PCR testing. Description of the problem HCW screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection is essential for prevention and control of the pandemic. Lombardy's Healthcare authorities settled a screening process for HCWs divided into three steps: 1) body temperature assessment at the beginning and the end of work shift, if fever > 37.5 °C was present the HCW was sent back home and a nasopharyngeal swab was performed; 2) progressive recruitment for serological testing; 3) on those positive to IgG a nasopharyngeal swab was performed and tested for viral RNA by RT-PCR. Results Among 79185 HCW tested, 9589 (12%) were positive on serological IgG testing. Of the 9589 positive a nasopharyngeal swab was performed on 6884. Of these 358 (5%) tested positive and the remaining 6526 (95%) negative to RT-PCR. We calculated a Positive Predictive Value of 5.2%. The rate of positive serological tests for each Healthcare facility varied between 0% and 78%. Five percent of all facilities, belonging to Brescia, Bergamo and Cremona area, reported a positivity rate higher than 40% in HCWs. A second cluster (18% of all facilities), involving the same geographical area, reported a rate between 20% and 40%, whereas the remaining facilities (76%) of the region a rate <20%. Lessons Serological IgG testing can be, if followed by immediate nasopharyngeal swab testing, a valid screening intervention on asymptomatic HCWs especially in a high infection prevalence setting. Key messages Serological IgG testing can be, if followed by immediate nasopharyngeal swab testing, a valid screening intervention on asymptomatic HCWs. Infection prevention in HCW may benefit from a screening campaign especially in high prevalence settings.

Download Full-text

Response to BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine among healthcare workers in Italy: a 3-month follow-up

Internal and Emergency Medicine ◽

10.1007/s11739-021-02857-y ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Domenico Ponticelli ◽

Fabiana Madotto ◽

Sara Conti ◽

Ippazio C. Antonazzo ◽

Andrea Vitale ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Healthcare Workers ◽

Future Research ◽

Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽

Special Focus ◽

Rt Pcr ◽

Vaccine Response ◽

Serology Testing ◽

Effectiveness Data

AbstractThis study investigated the response to BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine among healthcare workers (HCWs) in an Italian teaching hospital. 444 participants were surveyed with either multiple RT-PCR assays for detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid in nasopharyngeal swabs or serology testing for the research of virus-specific immunoglobulins. Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) were reported. Two weeks after the first dose anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies exceeded reactivity cut-off in 82.5% the participants. Four HCWs tested positive at nasopharyngeal swab after 3 months. More than three-quarters reported AEFIs. Our findings offer an insight regarding the vaccine response after 3 months from its administration, with a special focus on effectiveness data, as well as the type and number of AEFIs complained by HCW recipients. The presented study may serve as reference for future research which will be necessary to explore the long-term safety of this vaccine, especially in population at high risk for infection, such as HCWs.

Download Full-text

COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspective of an Italian Tertiary Care Pediatric Center

Healthcare ◽

10.3390/healthcare8030311 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (3) ◽

pp. 311 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Daniele Donà ◽

Carlo Giaquinto ◽

Eugenio Baraldi ◽

Alessandra Biffi ◽

Piergiorgio Gamba ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Healthcare Workers ◽

Infection Prevention ◽

Tertiary Care ◽

Phone Call ◽

Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽

Administrative Staff ◽

Double Gate ◽

Rapid Spread ◽

Novel Coronavirus ◽

Pediatric Center

Since February 2020, Italy has been faced with the dramatic spread of novel Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. This impetuous pandemic infection forced many hospitals to reorganize their healthcare systems. Predicting a rapid spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus within our region, the Department for Women’s and Children’s Health promptly decided (i) to revise the distribution of the clinical areas in order to create both designated COVID-19 and COVID-19-free areas with their own access, (ii) to reinforce infection prevention control (IPC) measures for all healthcare workers and administrative staff and (iii) to adopt the new “double-gate approach”: a phone call pre-triage and nasopharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2 detection before the admission of all patients and caregivers. Between 21 February 2020 till 04 May 2020, only seven physicians, two nurses and two of the administrative staff resulted positive, all during the first week of March. No other cases of intra-department infection were documented among the healthcare workers since all the preventive procedures described above were implemented. It is predicted that similar situations can happen again in the future, and thus, it is necessary to be more prepared to deal with them than we were at the beginning of this COVID-19 pandemic.

Download Full-text

Risk Groups for SARS-CoV-2 Infection among Healthcare Workers: Community Versus Hospital Transmission

Infectious Disease Reports ◽

10.3390/idr13030067 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (3) ◽

pp. 724-729

Author(s):

Fatihan Pınarlık ◽

Zeliha Genç ◽

Mahir Kapmaz ◽

Süda Tekin ◽

Önder Ergönül

Keyword(s):

Healthcare Workers ◽

Risk Groups ◽

Rt Pcr ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Study Results ◽

Hospital Infection Control ◽

Household Members ◽

Increasing Risk ◽

Antibody Levels ◽

Hospital Transmission

Background: We aimed to detect the risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers (HCWs) in 2020 before the vaccination era. Methods: We surveyed SARS-CoV-2 infection among the HCWs in a hospital through screening for antibody levels and the detection of viral RNA by RT-PCR between May 2020 and December 2020. Occupational and non-occupational potential predictors of disease were surveyed for the HCWs included in this study. Results: Among 1925 personnel in the hospital, 1732 were included to the study with a response rate of 90%. The overall infection rate of HCWs was 16.3% at the end of 2020, before vaccinations started. In the multivariate analysis, being janitorial staff (OR: 2.24, CI: 1.21–4.14, p = 0.011), being a medical secretary (OR: 4.17, CI: 2.12–8.18, p < 0.001), having at least one household member with a COVID-19 diagnosis (OR: 8.98, CI: 6.64–12.15, p < 0.001), and number of household members > 3 (OR: 1.67, CI: 1.26–2.22, p < 0.001) were found to be significantly associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Conclusions: Medical secretaries and janitorial staff were under increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The community-hospital gradient can explain the mode of transmission for infection among HCWs. In the setting of this study, community measures were less strict, whereas hospital infection control was adequate and provided necessary personal protective equipment. Increasing risk in larger households and households with diagnosed COVID-19 patient indicates the community-acquired transmission of the infection.

Download Full-text