scholarly journals Jawade Hafidz Arsyad's Perspective on Corruption in the Perspective of State Administrative Law

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-140
Author(s):  
Miftakhul Ihwan

The government with all its tools as the main pillars of state administrators is increasingly faced with several problems. There needs to be unity between government elements in solving a problem, one of which is corruption, corruption is generally carried out by people who have power in a position, so that the characteristics of corruption crimes are always related to the misuse of organized power. in looking at corruption belonging to organized crime. The task of the State Administration in the welfare state according to Lemaire is mentioned as the bestuurzorg task and its function is to carry out public welfare. To achieve the goals of the state various supporting facilities are needed, in this case one of them is a legal means. The strategy offered in the perspective of  State Administrative Law is to eradicate corruption, namely Public Service Bureaucracy Reform and Accountability, Eligible General Principles of Government, Good Govermance, and Eradication of the End of  Corruption in a State Administrative Law Perspective.

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
M. Zamroni

The concept of a welfare state starts from many typical countries, namely the Police State (Polizei Staat), the State of Formal Law (Liberal) and the State of Material Law (Welvaarstaat / welfare state). The Police State and the Welfare State are considered as extreme forms of legal state because the State Police is the beginning of the Law State. Welfare State is a type of legal state that is considered current. The Principles of Good Governance were born during the development of the Welfare State. This study reveals the legal basis of the General Principles of Good Governance of several regulations. The results show that the general principle of good governance is currently regulated comprehensively in regulation in Indonesia. The regulation includes 1) Act Number 28 of 1999 on State Implementation of the Clean and Free from Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism 2) Act Number 9 of 2004, concerning the Amendment to Indonesian Act Number 5 of 1986 on Administrative Courts Country 3) Act Number 25 of 2009 on Public Service 4) Act Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration. As a modern country, general principles of good governance is the spirit for the implementation of the government administration of the Indonesian Republic, especially in the context of the implementation of clean governance based on expediency, justice, and legal certainty.


Author(s):  
I Ketut Cahyadi Putra

The State of Pancasila Law essentially stems from the principle of kinship, deliberation of consensus based on customary law, and protection of human rights with the principle of balance between the rights and obligations and the function of the law of auxiliary. As contained in the Fifth Precept of Pancasila that is social justice for all Indonesian people, and the opening of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia related to the phrase "advancing public welfare" is the basic formula of welfare state ideology then manifested into the constitution of the state of Indonesia to be made Guidance of nation life and state administration. Negara Hukum Pancasila esensinya berpangkal pada asas kekeluargaan, musyawarah mufakat berlandaskan hukum adat, dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia dengan prinsip keseimbangan antara hak dan kewajiban dan fungsi hukum pengayoman. Sebagaimana yang terkandung dalam Sila Kelima Pancasila yaitu keadilan sosial bagi seluruh rakyat Indonesia, dan pembukaan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 terkait frase “memajukan kesejahteraan umum” merupakan rumusan dasar ideologi welfare state kemudian dimanifestasikan ke dalam batang tubuh konstitusi negara Indonesia untuk dijadikan pedoman hidup berbangsa dan penyelenggaraan kenegaraan.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Sri Suatmiati

<p>In Several states, social security for citizens is place to protect marginalized groups in order to maintain access to public services are rudimentary, such as services to meet the needs from the perspective of political economy known as basic need. Public welfare provision in the state system includes services in the areas of basic education, health and housing are cheap and good quality, if Necessary, free as in Western Europe is a cluster of countries are quite intense in terms of the welfare state principles. Free education and health is a major concern in Western Europe to get subsidies. The Data agency (BPS) said that the Indonesian population in 2010 income Rp.27,0 million a year. There are poor people Whose population is 80 percent of the population only contributes about 20 percent of GDP. There are the wealthy once or people who enter the category earn more than 30,000 dollars a year, but there are Also people with disabilities living income or $ 2 dollars per day (730 dollars a year), the which are still 100 million people. It means there is a huge gap. The words fair, equitable, wellbeing and prosperity was growing dimmer and the faint sound. This condition shows how there is no equity in income Because there is no strong will to realize the vision for the welfare of society. Impossible Anti-poverty program run properly if the governance of the state and society is not yet fully base on the welfare state system. Anti-poverty programs intertwine with the application of individual taxation that is progressive. If taxation without concept, poverty reduction strategy with the government has not gone According to the terms of the welfare state that is pro-poor.</p>


Jurnal Hukum ◽  
1970 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 841
Author(s):  
Jawade Hafidz

The republic of Indonesian is a law country with welfare state concept. Consequently, each activity should be oriented around the goals based on the law that organize state activities, government, and society. The State is required to play a role and to interfere on its socety life in order to achieve prosperity. One of the important role is state administration to serve the society. In recent time, state administrative law plays a large role, because the state grants the authority to government in organizing society’s concerns and welfare, which mean the state  to be functionsto serve socety’s needs.Keywords: Law, Serve, Society


2018 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 03008
Author(s):  
Tuti Widyaningrum ◽  
Rike Yunita Budi Hutami

This paper proposed an analytical study and investigation about State-owned enterprises (SOEs) privatization policy against welfare state perspective. Other than having an economic impact it also led to a constitutional polemic in Indonesia. So far, privatization of SOEs is considered as the best solution for SOEs to be more productive and efficient when handled by the private sector rather than controlled and managed by the state. However, the negative impact of privatization is not least disadvantageous for the state especially to the people where there are no guarantees and legitimacy from the state responsibility when SOEs has already profit oriented. This research would like to find a new concept of privatization of SOEs in accordance with the welfare state perspective. This research used a normative juridical legal research method. This method was chosen because the object was of norms and doctrines and legal principles related to the title of this research. The Author believes, Privatization has changed the social welfare schemes at as well as distorted the role and responsibilities of the state in realizing common prosperity. The conclusion is the Government should to review all regulations concerning the SOEs privatization and revoke regulations that are contrary to the welfare state principle in Indonesia.


Author(s):  
Ervien Rizky Aditya

Government in carrying out its duties is equipped with the authority of both the attributive and the delegative. With the development of society, there are often certain urgent circumstances, in which Government Officials/Administration Bodies can not use their authority which is bound to take legal action. In realizing the goal as a state with the concept of welfare general (welfare state) then the government must play an active role in interfacing the field of social economic life of the community. The government delegated responsibility bestuurszorg or public service. With this discretionary authority it means that some of the powers held by the legislature are transferred into the administration of the state as the executive body. Because the state administration has solved the problem by not waiting for the amendment of the Law from the legislative field, so the government should not refuse to provide services to the public on the grounds that there is no or no clear rule of law as long as it is still the authority of the government. But the power of government as a discretionary policy maker is always faced with a problem connected with corruption. Pemerintah dalam menjalankan tugasnya dilengkapi dengan kewenangan-kewenangan baik yang bersifat atributif maupun yang bersifat delegatif. Dengan adanya perkembangan masyarakat maka seringkali terdapat keadaan-keadaan tertentu yang sifatnya mendesak, dimana Pejabat/Badan Administrasi pemerintahan tidak dapat menggunakan kewenangannya yang bersifat terikat dalam melakukan tindakan hukum. Dalam mewujudkan tujuan sebagai negara dengan konsep kesejahteraan umum maka pemerintah harus berperan aktif mencampuri bidang kehidupan sosial ekonomi masyarakat. Maka pemerintah dilimpahkan tanggung jawab sebagai pelayan publik atau public service. Dengan adanya kewenangan diskresi ini berarti bahwa sebagian kekuasaan yang dipegang oleh badan pembentuk Undang-Undang dipindahkan ke dalam administrasi negara sebagai badan eksekutif. Karena administrasi negara melakukan penyelesaian masalah dengan tidak menunggu perubahan Undang-Undang dari bidang legislatif, sehingga pemerintah tidak boleh menolak memberikan pelayanan kepada masyarakat dengan alasan tidak ada atau tidak jelasnya aturan hukum sepanjang masih menjadi kewenangan dari pemerintah. Namun kekuasaan pemerintah sebagai pembuat kebijakan diskresi selalu berhadapan dengan adanya suatu permasalahan yang dihubungkan dengan tindak pidana korupsi.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-64
Author(s):  
M Makhfudz

Abstract: The condition of the country is currently experiencing a crisis of national leadership both in the hands of state administrators, government organizations and so on. Such conditions when viewed from the history of state administration in the era of the old order and the new order is no better than reform in terms of leaders who have noble ethical morals. This greatly influences the development of the country to advance in competition with other nations. So that the government continues to be preoccupied with revamping activities and regulating the implementation of the state so that it is clean from corruption and extortion which causes high costs. Then immediately take firm action after the Presidential Regulation number 87 of 2016 concerning the Establishment of the Clearing Task Force for Illegal Charges. Keywords: ethical morality, strategies to face obstacles. Abstrak: Kondisi Negeri kini sedang mengalami krisis kepemimpinan nasional baik melanda penyelenggara negara, organisasi pemerintahan dan lain sebagainya. Kondisi demikian jika dilihat dari sejarah penyelenggaraan negara di era orde lama dan orde baru tidak lebih baik ketimbang reformasi dari segi pemimpin yang memiliki moral etik yang luhur. Hal ini sangat mempengaruhi berkembangnya negara untuk maju menyaingi negara bangsa lainnya. Sehingga pemerintah terus disibukan oleh kegiatan pembenahan dan pengaturan strategi penyelenggaraan negara agar bersih dari korup dan pungli yang sebabkan biaya tinggi. Kemudian segera melakukan tindakan tegas pasca ditetapkan Perpres nomor 87 tahun 2016 tentang Pembentukan Satuan Tugas Sapu Bersih Pungli. Kata kunci: moral etik, strategi hadapi hambatan. DOI: 10.15408/sjsbs.v5i1.7901


2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Else Trangbæk

Artiklen reflekterer over de normer og forventninger, der har været og styrer den politiske tækning i forhold til idræt og velfærdspolitik. Idrættens autonomi diskuteres desuden.  In recent years, the welfare state and the welfare model have been put on the political agenda in Denmark. Some politicians argue that the state has to reduce the costs for welfare, not least because of the increasing expenses caused by the increasing life expectancy of the population. Others believe that the »burden« should be shifted from the government to the civil society or the market. Despite disagreements, there is quite a large consensus that the welfare state has to be preserved, but that it must be reassessed. The article reflects the norms and expectations that have been and still are the basis of political reflections about the Danish sports and welfare policy. In addition, it is argued that the focus on the autonomy of sport should be replaced by a dialogue and an analysis of the interdependence of sport and welfare.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 83
Author(s):  
Syamsuri Syamsuri ◽  
Dadang Irsyamuddin

The discourse about the Welfare State is interesting. This article aims to conduct in-depth analysis related to the concept of the welfare state and its relation to maqasid sharia according to Jamaluddin Athiyyah. The method used in this study is qualitative with a literature approach, namely conducting a study of the literature surrounding the welfare state and the Maqasid sharia. The conclusion of this study is that Athiyyah provides an overview of the division of tasks of the government in ensuring the welfare of its people into four dimensions, namely: individuals, families, society and humanity. Furthermore it was stated that the three basic principles of maqasid sharia to create prosperity would not be fulfilled but rather with the active role of the State.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document