scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Sebagai Kurir Narkotika

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-330
Author(s):  
Asep Syarifuddin Hidayat ◽  
Samul Anam ◽  
Muhammad Ishar Helmi
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Drug Trafficking ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Active Role ◽  
Illegal Drug ◽  
The State ◽  
Limited Ability ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Law

Abstract.Children have an important role in the life of society and the state, because of their position as the nation's successor. Therefore, children have the potential to play an active role in preserving the life of the nation, in order to realize the goal of forming a government that protects citizens. The abuse of narcotics by children is currently a concern of many people and is constantly being discussed and published. In fact, the problem of narcotics abuse is of concern to various groups, moreover the involvement of children as narcotics couriers which is a series of evil consensus in carrying out illegal drug trafficking. In the capacity of children who are used as couriers is one thing that is so alarming that the child will face the law, and is classified as having committed narcotics crimes. With the limited ability of children and their imperfections, it needs to be a concern of law enforcement officials in the application of punishment for the child who is the perpetrator of the narcotics crime.Keywords: Legal Protection, Children, Narcotics Courier. Abstrak. Anak mempunyai peranan yang penting di dalam kehidupan bermasyarakat dan bernegara, karena kedudukannya sebagai  penerus bangsa. Oleh karena itu, anak mempunyai potensi untuk berperan aktif menjaga kelestarian kehidupan bangsa,  guna mewujudkan tujuan pembentukan suatu pemerintah yang melindungi warga negara. Penyalahgunaan narkotika oleh anak saat ini menjadi perhatian banyak orang dan terus menerus dibicarakan dan dipublikasikan. Bahkan, masalah penyalahgunaan narkotika menjadi perhatian berbagai kalangan, apalagi adanya keterlibatan anak sebagai kurir narkotika yang merupakan rangkaian permufakatan jahat dalam menjalankan peredaran narkotika secara illegal. Dalam kapasitas anak yang dijadikan kurir merupakan satu hal yang begitu memprihatinkan dimana anak tersebut akan berhadapan dengan hukum, dan tergolong telah melakukan tindak pidana narkotika. Dengan keterbatasan kemampuan anak dan ketidaksesempurnaannya, maka perlu menjadi perhatian aparat penegak hukum dalam penerapan pemidanaan bagi anak pelaku tindak pidana narkotika tersebut.Kata Kunci: Perlindungan Hukum, Anak, Kurir Narkotika.

scholarly journals Urgensi Saksi Pelaku yang Bekerjasama (Justice Collaborator) dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 179-185
Author(s):  
Ni Luh Made Dwi Pusparini ◽  
A. A. Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Social Life ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The State ◽  
Major Influence ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Article 5

The State of Indonesia appears as a State of Law meaning that State power is exercised according to applicable laws so the law applies to all aspects of social life that lead to the creation of an objective of the law. As a consequence of the weakness of the law in the State of Indonesia there are still a large number of crimes that are developing, including the criminal acts of corruption as one of organized crimes. Not only have corruption crimes developed in Indonesia but also in other countries. As a result, in tackling the emergence of the criminal acts of corruption, it is necessary to have perpetrators cooperating as witnesses with law enforcement authorities in terms of revealing the main perpetrators and others so it has a major influence on the corruption case. Using the normative legal research method, this research examines the urgency of regulating witnesses of collaborating perpetrators in a the criminal act of corruption and the criminal sanctions against witnesses of collaborating perpetrators in criminal acts of corruption. The results show that in positive Indonesian law there are regulations regarding Justice Collaborator in Government Regulation No 71 Article 5 Paragraph (2) of 2000 regulating the rights and legal protection of every witness, criminal reporter / witness who reports. Whereas judges’ considerations in imposing criminal sanctions on justice collaborators in the criminal acts of corruption which are based on Law No. 20 of 2001 related to Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning Eradicating Corruption Crimes and is contained in the Supreme Court Circular No. 4 of 2011 in specific actions regarding Criminal Sanctions namely providing relief in other forms of protection.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP JUSTICE COLLABORATOR TERKAIT PENANGANAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI INDONESIA

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rika Ekayanti
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Scientific Journal ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Evidential Value ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
The Law ◽  
Laws And Regulations

The discussion in this thesis raised regarding Legal Protection against Justice Collaborator in the handling of corruption in Indonesia. The objectives of this study are to be analyzed with both forms of regulation and identify the type of protection provided by the laws of the State of Indonesia justice collaborator and determine the accuracy of the strength of the evidential value of the testimony in the trial of a justice collaborator, by analyzing the legal provisions in the legislation other law relating to witnesses. This type of research is used in a scientific journal this is the kind of normative legal research, because there is disharmony norm based research in the form of a legal vacuum regarding the setting justice collaborator in formal laws and regulations in Indonesia, as well as the legal ambiguities in the text of the legislation on Article 10 paragraph (2) Law No.. 13 of 2006 on the Protection of Witnesses and Victims of the justice collaborator testimony that can be used as consideration to give the judge for leniency. Having regard to the development of the current law that requires courage and willingness of law enforcement in combating corruption as an extraordinary crime, it is necessary to break the law through the use of an instrument justice collaborator.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP WHISTLEBLOWER DI INDONESIA: SINERGI ANTARA UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION AGAINST CORRUPTION DAN HUKUM NASIONAL TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN SAKSI DAN KORBAN

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ratna Juwita
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
United Nations ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The State ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
United Nations Convention ◽  
Victim Protection ◽  
The Law ◽  
Criminal Legal System

AbstractIndonesia ratified the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) through the Law number 7 of 2006. Article 33 of the UNCAC legally obliges the State Parties to provide protection to whistleblowers. The existence of whistleblower is pivotal to uncover the hidden practices of corruption. Anti-corruption strategy encourages whistleblowers to unveil corrupt practices to the law enforcement agencies and public. Due to this task, therefore, whistleblowers must be protected from any kind of retaliation. Indonesia has the Law number 13 of 2006 juncto the Law number 31 of 2014 concerning witness and victim protection which regulates the protection of whistleblower in the Indonesian criminal legal system. This paper analyzes existence of legal protection for whistleblowers in the respective provisions which contained within the Law number 13 of 2006 and the Law number 31 of 2014, specifically on anti-retaliation protection by analyzing the synchronization of the law with Article 33 of the UNCAC. The provisions of national law vis-à-vis with the provisions of UNCAC concerning whistleblower protection, the national law has not provided best protection to whistleblower yet due to the possibility of retaliation be made against the whistleblowers that is not regulated by the national law.Keywords: Indonesia, corruption, whistleblower, United Nations Convention Against Corruption.IntisariIndonesia meratifikasi United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) melalui Undang-undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2006. Pasal 33 UNCAC memberikan kewajiban hukum bagi Negara Pihak untuk menyediakan perlindungan terhadap para whistleblowers. Eksistensi whistleblower merupakan hal yang sangat penting untuk membuka praktek tersembunyi korupsi. Strategi anti-korupsi memberikan dorongan bagi para whistleblower untuk membuka praktek-praktek korupsi kepada penegak hukum dan masyarakat. Oleh karena tugasnya tersebut, para whistleblower harus dilindungi dari segala bentuk tindakan pembalasan. Indonesia memiliki Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban  yang di dalamnya mengatur perlindungan terhadap whistleblower dalam sistem hukum pidana Indonesia. Tulisan ini menganalisis eksistensi perlindungan hukum bagi whistleblower dalam pasal-pasal tentang perlindungan whistleblower dalam Undang-Undang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban, secara spesifik pada perlindungan terhadap tindakan pembalasan dengan menganalisis sinkronisasi hukum terhadap Pasal 33 UNCAC. Pasal-pasal dalam hukum nasional vis-à-vis dengan Ppasal UNCAC tentang perlindungan terhadap whistleblower, hukum nasional belum mampu menyediakan perlindungan terbaik bagi whistleblower dikarenakan adanya kemungkinan untuk dilakukannya tindakan pembalasan terhadap whistleblower yang belum diatur dalam hukum nasional.Kata kunci: Indonesia, korupsi, whistleblower, United Nations Convention Against Corruption.

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PROFESI KEPOLISIAN DALAM MENJALANKAN TUGAS POKOK DAN FUNGSI PENYELESAIAN TINDAK PIDANA DI KEPOLISIAN DAERAH (POLDA) PROPINSI KEPULAUAN BANGKA BELITUNG

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinta Jayanti Apriana
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Human Dignity ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The State ◽  
Police Force ◽  
Legal Rights ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Subjects

Legal protection is very effort to shelther the human dignity and recognize of human rights in the legal field. A country has the responsibility to socialize new regulations to its society so that they will be aware of the law and also of their rights protected by the state. If society’s legal awareness is growing well, then legal protection in this country will run properly. The development of law enforcement is the beginning of the Police Force. It offers a very interesting history in the development of humanity. Despite the progress that goes slowly, the efforrt is gradually continued in line with the development of human civilization. Thus the ask of the Police is to perforn law enforcement, and the authority of its duty is restricted under the law. In reality, the Police offers in Indonesia are not Legal subjects who never made mistake; hence the author deems that the legal rights and obligations of these officers should be similar as the community at large.

scholarly journals Penyalahgunaan Wewenang dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Setelah Berlakunya UU No. 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Zulkarnaen Zulkarnaen ◽  
Zainal Asikin ◽  
Amiruddin Amiruddin
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Government Administration ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Law

This research was conducted to find out how the concept of abuse of authority in criminal acts of corruption after the enactment of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration; and How was law enforcement in handling criminal acts of corruption after the enactment of the Law Number 30 of 2014. This research was a normative legal research. The approach used in this research was the statutory approach, the conceptual approach, and the comparative approach. From the results of the study it could be concluded that the concept of abuse of authority in criminal acts of corruption after the entry into force of Law Number 30 of 2024 concerning Government Administration was the Abuse of authority in accordance with Article 17 of Law No. 30 of 2014. Law No. 30 of 2014 focused on preventing abuse of authority. Aspects of criminal acts of corruption were first proven based on administrative law. In the process of law enforcement, if there was indeed an abuse of authority, then it became the basis by law enforcement officials to investigate or investigate allegations of corruption against the abusers of authority, whereas if in testing the abuse of authority by the State Administrative Court, the evidence was not proven, of course these actions could not be used as a basis for conducting investigations.

scholarly journals TANGGUNGJAWAB NEGARA MELINDUNGI GURU DALAM MELAKSANAKAN TUGAS PROFESIONALNYA

2020 ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Yuli Asmara Triputra ◽  
Derry Angling Kesuma ◽  
Silvana Oktanisa ◽  
Wasitoh Meirani
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Active Role ◽  
The State ◽  
Judicial Power ◽  
Professional Educators ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government

Abstrak Guru adalah pendidik profesional yang tugas dan perannya telah diatur dalam peraturan perundang-undangan. Negara selaku pemangku kewajiban dalam melindungi warga negara terkhusus guru, dituntut peran aktifnya dalam melindungi guru dari tindakan kriminalisasi akibat melaksanakan tugas profesionalnya. Pada tataran peraturan, pemerintah telah melakukan tindakan aktif berupa pengundangan beberapa peraturan terkait tugas dan peran guru. Namun dalam taraf penegakan hukum, masih sering ditemui guru yang berhadapan dengan hukum akibat laporan dari orang tua murid atas tindakan guru yang mendisiplinkan murid. Mahkamah Agung selaku judex juris, melalui Putusan Nomor : 1554K/ Pid/ 2013 telah memvonis bebas guru di Majalengka yang bernama Aop Saopudin selaku terdakwa karena Mahkamah Agung menganggap apa yang dilakukannya sudah menjadi tugasnya dan bukan bukan merupakan suatu tindak pidana dan terdakwa tidak dapat dijatuhi pidana atas perbuatan/tindakannya tersebut karena bertujuan untuk mendidik agar menjadi murid yang baik dan berdisiplin. Putusan Mahkamah Agung merupakan wujud tanggungjawab negara melalui lembaga kekuasaan kehakiman memberikan perlindungan terhadap guru dalam melaksanakan tugas profesionalnya. Kata Kunci : Tanggungjawab negara, Perlindungan, Guru. Abstract Teachers are professional educators whose duties and roles have been regulated in the legislation. The state as a stakeholder in protecting citizens, especially teachers, is required to play an active role in protecting teachers from criminalization due to carrying out their professional duties. At the regulatory level, the government has taken active action in the form of the invite of several regulations related to the duties and roles of teachers. However, in law enforcement level, there are still often teachers who face the law due to reports from parents of students for the actions of teachers who discipline students. The Supreme Court as judex juris, through The Verdict Number: 1554K / Pid / 2013 has sentenced a free teacher in Majalengka named Aop Saopudin as a defendant because the Supreme Court considers what he did has become his duty and not a criminal act and the defendant can not be sentenced for his actions because it aims to educate to be a good student and disciplined. The Supreme Court's decision is a manifestation of the state's responsibility through the institution of judicial power to provide protection to teachers in carrying out their professional duties.

scholarly journals Fungsi Justice Collaborators Terhadap Kejahatan Terorganisasi Tindak Pidana Narkotika

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 1659
Author(s):  
Silvania Soviana
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Organized Crime ◽  
Drug Trafficking ◽  
Illicit Drug ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
The Law ◽  
Illicit Drug Trafficking

AbstractIllicit drug trafficking is one of the criminal acts that has never subsided in Indonesia because the negative impact is so great and dangerous. As one of the law enforcement officers, the police certainly take part in efforts to eradicate illicit drug trafficking. In carrying out combating organized crime in illicit drug trafficking, the police assume the role of investigator as well as investigator. In carrying out the eradication of organized crime in illicit drug trafficking, the investigator does not merely disclose the crime alone. Investigators are assisted by collaborating witnesses called justice collaborators. The function of the justice collaborators who work together in assisting investigators, donating assistance in the form of providing information, reports, and / or testimonies related to further information about narcotic crimes. The justice collaborators also get legal protection guaranteed by law. Keywords: Illicit Drug Trafficking; Justice Collaborator; Organized Crime.AbstrakTindak pidana Narkotika ialah salah satu dari tindak pidana yang tidak pernah surut eksistensinya di negara Indonesia karena dampak negatif yang disebabkan begitu besar dan membahayakan. Sebagai salah satu aparat penegak hukum, Polisi tentu turut andil dalam upaya pemberantasan tindak pidana Narkotika. Dalam melakukan pemberantasan kejahatan terorganisasi tindak pidana narkotika, Polisi mengemban peran sebagai penyelidik sekaligus penyidik. Dalam melakukan pemberantasan kejahatan teroganisasi tindak pidana narkotika, penyidik tidak semata-mata melakukan pengungkapan tindak pidana tersebut sendirian. Penyidik dibantu oleh saksi pelaku yang bekerjasama yang disebut justice collaborator. Adanya fungsi dari saksi pelaku yang bekerja sama dalam membantu penyidik, menyumbangkan bantuan berupa pemberian informasi, laporan, dan/atau kesaksian terkait keterangan lebih lanjut mengenai tindak pidana narkotika. Saksi yang bekerja sama juga mendapatkan perlindungan hukum yang dijamin oleh undang-undang.Kata Kunci: Kejahatan Terorganisasi; Saksi Yang Bekerja Sama; Tindak Pidana Narkotika.

Urgensi Assesment Report Dalam Omnibus Law RUU Cipta Kerja

ADALAH ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Indra Rahmatullah
Keyword(s):  
Academic Research ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The State ◽  
The Law ◽  
Scientific Arguments

Abstract:A draft law must be able to answer and solve the main problem of the society so that with the existence of the law the community gets legal protection from the state. However, the draft of Cipta Kerja Law makes an endless controversy. In fact, the draft was allegedly containing some problems since its appearance. Therefore, academic research (Assesment Report) is needed so that the rules in the draft have basic scientific arguments that can be justified. Unfortunately, the draft does not conduct an assesment report to know whether the society need the law and urgent.Keywords: Legal Protection, Controversy and Assesment Report Abstrak:Sebuah rancangan undang-undang harus dapat menjawab dan menyentuh pokok permasalahan masyarakat sehingga dengan adanya undang-undang tersebut masyarakat mendapatkan sebuah perlindungan hukum dari negara. Namun, dalam RUU Cipta Kerja ini justru berakibat pada kontroversi yang tiada hentinya. Bahkan, disinyalir RUU ini mengandung kecacatan sejak awal pembentukannya. Oleh karena itu, dibutuhkan penelitian akademis sehingga aturan-aturan yang ada dalam RUU ini mempunyai basis argumentasi ilmiah yang dapat dipertanggungjawabkan yang salah satunya adalah dengan membuat Laporan Kelayakan. Sayangnya RUU ini belum melakukan laporan kelayakan apakah RUU ini dibutuhkan dan penting di masyarakat.Katakunci: Perlindungan Hukum, Kontroversi dan Laporan Kelayakan

The State's Developmentalist Illusion and the Origins of Illegal Coca Cultivation in Peru's Alto Huallaga Valley (1960–80)

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-23
Author(s):  
Maritza Paredes ◽  
Hernán Manrique
Keyword(s):  
Drug Trafficking ◽  
Natural Environment ◽  
Soil Degradation ◽  
Illegal Drug ◽  
The State ◽  
Peruvian Amazon ◽  
State Development ◽  
Ecological Conditions ◽  
International Demand ◽  
Development Plans

Abstract The origin of illicit economies has been understood as a consequence of ‘low stateness’ (i.e. low reach of the state). Given the limited stateness in many regions, however, this article seeks to explain how only some sub-national territories have become vulnerable to illegal drug trafficking. To make this case, the representative example of the Alto Huallaga valley, in the Peruvian Amazon, is analysed. This article argues that ineffective development and settlement efforts by the Peruvian state in the Alto Huallaga, rather than the absence of the state, produced socio-ecological conditions in the region, in the late 1970s, that made it more vulnerable to the illegal economy. At the same time as international demand for illegal cocaine was expanding, two conditions resulting from frustrated state development plans came together: an enclave of poor peasants who were not self-sufficient and a natural environment impoverished by soil degradation and intensive deforestation, paradoxically not suitable for any crop except coca.

Law enforcement practice of judicial authorities on tax disputes

2021 ◽  
pp. 550-563
Author(s):  
Alexandr V. Izmalkov ◽  
Alexander A. Kuznetsov ◽  
Pavel A. Kuznetsov ◽  
Ella Y. Kuzmenko
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
The State ◽  
Effect Relationship ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Qualitative Characteristics ◽  
State Body

We analyze the law enforcement practice of judicial authorities on taxes and fees, since the Tax Code of the Russian Federation is a rather controversial regulatory legal act. Tax disputes arise both at the initiative of tax authorities and at the initiative of taxpayers. Purpose: to determine the main directions of law enforcement practice of courts in tax disputes. We use general scientific and specially legal methods as research methods. The focus is on the method of analysis. In the course of the research, we analyze the con-sideration of cases by judicial authorities on tax disputes, their quantitative and qualitative characteristics. We conclude that the emergence of disagree-ments between taxpayers and the state body when resolving the issue of the legality of their actions (inaction), as well as the legality of a non-normative legal act is the main reason for the formation of law enforcement practice in tax disputes. During the passage of all stages of the application of the law, it is also necessary to establish the existence of a cause-and-effect relationship between the actions of the taxpayer and the resulting consequences. The main points of this process go through several stages. We define the main directions of the law enforcement practice of courts in tax disputes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document