scholarly journals Preliminary Agreement Deed of Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB) on Houses through House Ownership Loan (KPR) Still in the Form of Pictures

Author(s):  
Syarifah Hijriyani ◽  
Salim HS ◽  
Muhaimin Muhaimin

The Research Objective is First To analyze the legal certainty of the Act of Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB) on houses through Housing Ownership Credit (KPR) which is still in the form of images. The second is to analyze the legal consequences of the Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB) deed for housing through mortgage loans that are still in the form of images.The type of research used by authors is normative research. Normative legal research is legal research that places law as a building system of norms. The norm system in question is regarding principles, norms, rules of law and regulations, court decisions, agreements and doctrines (teachings). By using an approach: Statutes Approach, Case Approach, Conceptual Approach.The results of the study that the certainty of PPJB in home ownership loans is still in the form of images is valid for the parties even though the PPJB is not regulated in the Civil Code, but the PPJB is valid as long as it meets the requirements as an agreement; not prohibited by law; in accordance with prevailing habits; as long as the agreement is implemented in good faith, the PPJB is valid and applies to both parties because it is an implementation of the principle of freedom of contract. The legal consequences of the Deed of Agreement on the Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB) on home ownership loans are still in the form of drawings which are the rules of both parties that must be obeyed and implemented. The deed of sale and purchase agreement can take two positions depending on how the Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB).

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-26
Author(s):  
Anak Agung Istri Agung ◽  
I Nyoman Sukandia

The inheritance and the division of inheritance that is felt to be unfair is often a source of dispute. The disputes that occur can sometimes be resolved by making a peace agreement between the disputing parties. The peace desired by the parties is, of course, expected to end disputes/conflict and to provide legal certainty among those in dispute. However, sometimes peace agreements that have been made between those in dispute are disputed again in court. This study aims to examine the settlement of Balinese traditional inheritance disputes through a binding peace agreement between the parties make it. The method used in this study is a normative legal research, using a statute approach and a case approach. The result of this study showed that the settlement of Balinese indigenous inheritance disputes through a binding peace agreement of the parties that make it if the peace agreement is made based on the validity of the agreement as stipulated in article 1320 of the Civil Code, based on good faith as the principles in the law of the agreement, and must be made in the form of a notary deed is in accordance with the provisions for conciliation in book III of the Civil Code.  


Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 441
Author(s):  
Indah Esti Cahyani ◽  
Aryani Witasari

Nominee agreement is an agreement made between someone who by law can not be the subject of rights to certain lands (property rights), in this case that foreigners (WNA) and Indonesian Citizen (citizen), with the intention that the foreigners can master land de facto property rights, but legal-formal (de jure) land property rights are assigned to his Indonesian citizen. The purpose of this paper isto assess the position of the nominee agreement in Indonesia's legal system and the legal consequences arising in terms of the draft Civil Code and the Law on Agrarian. Agreement is an agreement unnamed nominee made based on the principle of freedom of contract and good faith of the parties. However, it should be noted that the law prohibits foreigners make agreements / related statement stock wealth / property (land) for and on behalf of others, sehingga the legal consequences of the agreement is the nominee of the agreement is not legally enforceable because the agreement was made on a false causa.Keywords: Nominee Agreement; Property Rights; Foreigners.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 124-144
Author(s):  
Yenni Safitri

ABSTRAKPerjanjian informed consent harus dilaksanakan dengan asas itikad baik. Asas ini merupakan asas bahwa para pihak, yaitu pihak kreditur dan debitur harus melaksanakan substansi kontrak berdasarkan kepercayaan atau keyakinan yang teguh maupun kemauan baik dari para pihak. Tulisan ini membahas informed consent Dokter dan Pasien berdasarkan asas Good Faith dan akibat hukum tidak dilaksanakannya informed consent Dokter dan Pasien berdasarkan asas Good Faith. Metode penelitian adalah penelitian hukum normative kajian tentang asas hukum, peneliti mengumpulkan data yang terdiri dari data primer, sekunder dan tertier. Teknik pengumpulan data yaitu wawancara dan kajian kepustakaan. Analisis data dilakukan secara kualitatif serta menarik kesimpulan penulis menggunakan metode berfikir deduktif.Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah Informed consent antara dokter dan pasien harus berdasarkan asas good faith, bagi dokter informed consent memberikan rasa aman dalam menjalankan tindakan medis terhadap pasien. Bagi pasien, informed consent merupakan merupakan perwujudan dari hak pasien dimana pasien berhak mendapatkan informasi tentang penyakit yang dideritanya, tindakan medis apa yang hendak dilakukan, kemungkinan yang akan terjadi atas pengambilan keputusan tindakan medis. Apabila tidak ada informed consent berakibat tidak terpenuhinya salah satu syarat perjanjian menurut Pasal 1320 KUH Perdata, digolongkan sebagai wanprestasi dan digolongkan sebagai perbuatan melawan hukum berdasarkan Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata.Kata kunci: informed consent; good faith; dokter dan pasienABSTRACTAn informed consent agreement must be carried out in good faith. This principle is the principle that the parties, namely the creditors and debtors must carry out the substance of the contract based on the trust or firm belief or goodwill of the parties. This paper discusses the informed consent of Doctors and Patients based on the Good Faith principle and the legal consequences of not implementing the informed consent of Doctors and Patients based on the Good Faith principle. The research method is a normative legal research study of the principle of law, researchers collect data consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary data. Data collection techniques, namely interviews and literature review. Data analysis was carried out qualitatively and drawing conclusions from the author using deductive thinking methods. The conclusion of this study is that informed consent between doctors and patients must be based on the principle of good faith, for physicians informed consent to provide a sense of security in carrying out medical actions against patients. For patients, informed consent is an embodiment of the patient's right where the patient has the right to get information about the disease he is suffering from, what medical action he wants to take, the likelihood that will occur in making a decision on medical action. If no informed consent results in failure to fulfill one of the terms of the agreement under Article 1320 of the Civil Code, it is classified as a default and is classified as unlawful pursuant to Article 1365 of the Civil Code. Keywords: informed consent; good faith; doctors and patients


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 112
Author(s):  
Ida Ayu Putu Kristanty Mahadewi ◽  
Dewa Nyoman Rai Asmara Putra

Tujuan penelitian untuk mengkaji akibat hukum serta penyelesaian terhadap harta bersama berdasarkan hukum perkawinan apabila terjadi perceraian dan pemisahan harta bersama karena suatu hal. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normative, yakni suatu penelitian yang berdasarkan pada pendekatan perundang-undangan, bahan pustaka, putusan pengadilan dan ketentuan yang sebagaimana mestinya. Serta teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan studi dokumen. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa dengan adanya suatu perjanjian dalam perkawinan maka harta benda dan harta bersama dari kedua pihak akan memiliki kepastian hukum yang tetap jika dilihat dari perspektif hukum. Penyelesaian harta bersama biasanya dilakukan dengan cara pemisahan harta benda kedua belah pihak. Penyelesaian perkara mengenai pembagian harta bersama yang terbaik adalah dilakukan dengan cara kekeluargaan. Penyelesaian permasalahan mengenai pemisahan harta bersama melalui pengadilan, juga bisa diusulkan melalui pengajuan gugatan sendiri oleh pihak yang berperkara maupun perantara melalui pengacara hukum. Dan permohonan mengenai pemisahan harta bersama tidak bisa diajukan bersamaan dengan gugatan cerai. The purpose of this study is to examine the legal consequences and the settlement of joint assets based on marriage law if the event of divorce and separation of joint assets for some reason. This study uses a normative legal research method, which is a study based on a statutory approach, library materials, court decisions and appropriate provisions. As well as data collection techniques carried out by document study. The results of the study show that with agreement in marriage, the property and joint assets of the two parties will have permanent legal certainty from a legal perspective. Settlement of joint assets is usually carried out by familial way. The settlement of problems regarding the separation of joint assets through the court, can also be proposed through filing a lawsuit by the litigant or intermediary through a lawyer. And applications regarding the separation of joint assets cannot be filed at the same time as a divorce suit.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 646
Author(s):  
Imelda Septy Febrian ◽  
Hanafi Tanawijaya

In practice, borrowing money is one of the means to get funds needed by humans. However, with the development of the era of borrowing and borrowing, there must be strong evidence to prove that there has been a loan lending event. in practice the agreement is carried out either in writing or by word of mouth or written under the hand, in accordance with the demand for it must be made in the presence of good faith and legal certainty. In making an agreement usually given a predetermined period of time based on the agreement of the parties. And if the agreement has expired the time period has been set then in the agreement the debt is past its term. But in this case the agreement was expired and the creditor had only collected the debt to the debtor for 34 years. What if the creditor collects the debt that has passed this time and in the Islamic law the debt must be paid even though the person who has the debt has died. The author examines this problem by using normative legal research methods supported by interviews with people who are experts in the field of Islamic law and law. In this agreement, it can cause losses to the creditor. As a result, in Article 1362 of the Civil Code, it is said that if a default occurs, there is a compensation.


Acta Comitas ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 436
Author(s):  
Wulan Wiryantari Dewi ◽  
Ibrahim R

The notary's role is to provide legal protection to the people who use his services. The presence of a Notary is indispensable for the community concerned to hold a legal relationship with other individuals so that the Notary may also be liable. In the provisions of Article 16 paragraph (1) letter c of the Amendment Law, it is stipulated that in carrying out his position, the Notary is required to attach fingerprints on the minutes of the deed, giving rise to various polemics, because the said provisions do not stipulate further if in this case the smoker suffers from finger defects or events that result in damage to fingerprints which makes the investigator unable to put his fingerprint. The purpose of this research is to find out how the efforts that can be done by a notary against those who are unable to put fingerprints and the legal consequences of the absence of fingerprints against the strength of the deed. This research is a type of normative legal research. The results of this study indicate that efforts can be made by a notary if there are those who suffer from finger defects or experience events that cause fingerprint damage so that they cannot attach their fingerprints to the minutes of the deed, the relevant Notary can explain the matter at the end of the deed. he made it because the fingerprints attached to the address are an act that is required to a notary that can lead to administrative sanctions as contained in the Amendment Law. Due to the legal absence of fingerprints attached to the strength of the deed that is the deed made by the relevant Notary Public remains an authentic deed even though the fingerprints of the tappers are not attached based on Article 1869 of the Civil Code and the deed is valid and legally binding as long as the provisions contained in Article 1320 are fulfilled Civil Code.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaldi Pratama Bagus Putra

The legal consequences of the issuance of the land title certificate whose application is made by a party who is not the right holder / owner is legally flawed. Issuance of a legally invalid certificate and no binding force and cancellation by the court. The defendant obtains a parcel of land through an auction, the auction is proven by photocopies of the auction object certificate, according to Article 21 of the 2016 Bidding Guidelines that the registered land auction must include an original certificate, so The Defendant did not go through the correct legal procedures. For the issuance of a double certificate for the same land field, the buyer of the land field loses the ownership certificate that is purchased by another party as a buyer with good intentions, because it has been carried out in accordance with the correct legal procedure, which means that the purchaser's certificate is guaranteed legal certainty. Legal protection for the purchaser of good land rights, that the buyer as a buyer has good intentions, with the issuance of the HGB certificate Number 181 Village / Cicau Village covering an area of ​​26,700 m2 in the name of the Defendant, is impaired, so that legal protection provided to the Plaintiff is filing an objection to the issuance HGB certificate to the Land Office as a preventive legal protection. 


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 314
Author(s):  
Andi Pratono ◽  
Tjempaka Tjempaka

Indonesia is the law of state or law state, as a law state country, Indonesia must have 3(three) important element such as legal certainty, justice, and expediency. Those main elements represent all the law state. In community, people everyday acts always relate to legal act, such as contract, buying or selling object that promised. To ensure those legal act have the ability perfect proof power, those legal act poured in the form of deed. In buying and selling land, a deed of sale and purchase must be made in front authorized official like land deed officer. However land deed officer as public official do make mistake on duty, with the result that party at a disadvantage. Party that loss because of mistake land deed officer, do ask for responsibility by suing the land deed officer to compensate the losses. Land deed officer in carrying out their duties must apply the precautionary principle so as to minimize any mistakes in making the deed. Author is using normative legal research methods, supported by a data which is theory and interviews some expert in land deed officer and Code of Ethics. The legal consequences to the land deed officer due the legal acts are against the law, which is a sanction will be given. The sanction will divided in three types such as sanction according to the Civil Law, Criminal Law and Code of Ethics or Government Regulation about land deed officer.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 144
Author(s):  
Socha Tcefortin Indera Sakti ◽  
Ambar Budhisulistyawati

<p>Abstract <br />This article aims to analyze and to understand the legal protection provided to the parties involved in under-hand agreement of the sale of Letter C land. The legal protection or all of the parties involved is contained in the agreement if the agreement specifically stated it in its clauses. The kegal protection outside of the agreement is contained in the laws and regulations in force which is Civil Code and Statute. The legal protection is an important aspect to ensure the fulfillment of a person’s legal rights. Furthermore, it also has other objective, which is to realize legal certainty, legal benefits, and justice for the parties. Legal protection can be preventive or repressive. The agreements made in the underhand sale of Letter C land forms a legal relationship between the two parties. The legal relations are relationships that result in legal consequences guaranteed by the laws and regulations. Every legal act that causes legal consequences must have legal protection, especially when there is a dispute between the parties. Dispute can occur after the under-hand agreement of the sale of Letter C Land was agreed, therefore legal protection is needed to provide solutions, certainty and clarity towards the resolution of the existing as well as the potential post-agreement disputes.<br />Keywords: Legal Protection; Under-hand Agreement; the sale of Land.</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan mengetahui perlindungan hukum yang diberikan bagi para pihak yang terlibat didalam perjanjian dibawah tangan jual beli tanah Letter C. Perlindungan hukum yang diberikan bagi para pihak dalam perjanjian dibawah tangan terdapat di dalam perjanjian apabila dalam perjanjian disebutkan secara khusus dalam klausula-klausula yang telah disepakati dalam perjanjian. Perlindungan hukum yang terdapat diluar perjanjian yaitu dalam ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku, yaitu KUHPerdata dan undang-undang. Perlindungan hukum merupakan suatu hal yang penting dalam menjamin terpenuhinya hak-hak hukum seseorang. Selain itu, perlindungan hukum yang diberikan memiliki tujuan lain yaitu guna mewujudkan kepastian hukum, kemanfaatan hukum, dan keadilan bagi para pihak. Perlindungan hukum yang diberikan dapat bersifat preventif (mencegah) maupun represif (memperbaiki). Perjanjian yang disepakati dalam perjanjian jual beli tanah Letter C dibawah tangan menimbulkan suatu hubungan hukum antara dua pihak yang membuatnya. Hubungan hukum sendiri merupakan hubungan yang menimbulkan akibat hukum yang dijamin oleh hukum atau undang-undang. Setiap perbuatan hukum yang menimbulkan akibat hukum harus memiliki perlindungan hukum, terlebih disaat terjadi suatu sengketa diantara para pihaknya. Sengketa pertanahan dapat timbul setelah disepakatinya perjanjian jual beli tanah Letter C, maka dari itu diperlukan perlindungan hokum untuk memberi solusi dan kepastian serta kejelasan akan penyelesaian sengketa yang ada atau yang berpotensi terjadi pasca perjanjian disepakati.<br />Kata Kunci: Perlindungan Hukum; Perjanjian di bawah tangan; Jual Beli Tanah.</p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 105
Author(s):  
Aria Dimas Harapan ◽  
Andi Safira Yan Istiany

Starting from the need for capital, in practice some people are reluctant to make credit with banks, because the process is considered difficult, and too convoluted. Therefore, some people prefer to borrow a certain amount of money from individuals or what is better known as debt or credit. Talking about the debt and credit agreement, it will be closely related to collateral because every creditor needs a sense of security for the funds he lends. The author's research is made to examine and find out what efforts can be made if there is default in an underhand debt acknowledgment that guarantees the title of title to land without being preceded by a principal agreement, as well as the judge's consideration (Ratio Decidendi) in the Cassation Decision Number 837K / Pdt / 2019 concerning default in the debt acknowledgment. The research method used in this study is a descriptive normative juridical approach, namely research that refers to the legal norms contained in statutory regulations and court decisions. The results of the research obtained by the author in this study are the first consideration of the judge in deciding Case Number 837 / K / Pdt / 2019 is not quite right because in theory the judge's decision overrides legal certainty for a civil case by deciding in default of a debt acknowledgment, which then the judge also also declared null and void the debt acknowledgment. Where based on the provisions of Article 12 of Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights, the guarantee which is the object of the author's research, is a forbidden cause that is contrary to the validity of an agreement, so that the legal consequences are null and void from the start without having to obey prior default in the debt recognition deed. So that the author's suggestion is necessary for parties who want to carry out lending and borrowing activities, especially in terms of debt and credit, first understand any rules and legal norms that apply to their actions, so that they will not cause losses among the parties who bind themselves in the future.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document