scholarly journals On the Form of Government in the Modern Russia within the Framework of the Constitutional Amendments of 2020

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 31-35
Author(s):  
Yulia A. Gorbul ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Constitutional Amendments ◽  
Dominant Position ◽  
The Real ◽  
Basic Law ◽  
Russian State ◽  
Nominal Form ◽  
Form Of Government ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Republic

The article analyzes trends in the development of the theoretical construction of the form of government of the modern Russian state after amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation in 2020. Based on the analysis of the positions of leading Russian legal scholars on the issue of the form of the Republic of modern Russia, the conclusion is made that the changes made to the Basic law of the country in the summer of 2020 predetermined an even greater gap between the real and nominal characteristics of the Russian form of government. The author considers it possible to agree with the opinion of legal experts who define the nominal form of government of the Russian Federation as a presidential-parliamentary Republic with a dominant position of the President in the system of higher state authorities. The analysis of the constitutional amendments of 2020 shows that in practice, due to the real correlation between the branches of state power, the highest state bodies, and direct and inverse relations between state bodies and the population, the form of government in modern Russia can be defined as a special type of presidential Republic.

scholarly journals The Constitutional Status of the President of the Russian Federation in View of the Constitutional Reform in Russia

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 33-36
Author(s):  
Ruslan M. Dzidzoev ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Constitutional Reform ◽  
Constitutional Amendments ◽  
Basic Law ◽  
Head Of State ◽  
Form Of Government ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Relationship

The article examines the constitutional status of the President of the Russian Federation in the light of the latest constitutional amendments that marked a large-scale constitutional reform in Russia, analyzes the new powers of the head of state in the sphere of formation and functioning of state authorities by comparing the previous and new versions of the Basic law of Russia, common standards of a democratic and legal state. A special place in the article is occupied by the analysis of the relationship between the President and the Government of the Russian Federation, the constitutional formula of the General leadership of the President and the Government of the Russian Federation. The study examines the participation of the President in the formation of the Federal Government in relation to the powers of the State Duma. It is noted that the new presidential powers from the position of a mixed (presidential-parliamentary) way of government may seem excessive, but they look natural from the perspective of the presidential form of government in Russia.

CONSTITUTIONAL VALUES AT A NEW STAGE OF DEVELOPMENT OF THE BASIC LAW OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

2020 ◽  
pp. 60-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARAT SALIKOV ◽  
MAXIM GONCHAROV
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Stage Of Development ◽  
Basic Law ◽  
Russian State ◽  
The Russian Federation

the article examines the changes in the Basic Law taking place in the Russian Federation and their impact on the legal regulation of the constitutional values of the Russian state.

scholarly journals Legal and Technical Defects of Constitutional Amendments of 2020

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 24-34
Author(s):  
V. S. Goleshchikhin
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Constitutional Amendments ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Basic Law ◽  
Long Time ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Natural Result ◽  
Legal Technology

The quality of legal and technical elaboration of amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, approved by the all-Russian vote on July 1, 2020, does not correspond to the level of the Basic Law. Oddly enough, the constitutional legislator ignored a number of basic technical means, rules and methods of legal technique. Thus, the constitutional amendments were drafted without taking into account the requirements of the structural organization of the legal act, namely: many new norms were included in inappropriate articles, the transitional provision on "resetting the deadlines" was duplicated in the main text of the Constitution. The authors of the amendments abandoned criteria of efficiency and compactness of legislative norms, having included an identical set of restrictions in nine articles of the Constitution in relation to various categories of officials. The text does not meet the requirement for uniformity of legal regulation, legal structures, the unity, simplicity and brevity of terminology: the scope of constitutional restrictions for various categories of officials differs somewhat without any objective reasons; there is no uniformity in the issue of the possibility of establishing additional requirements for officials by laws, “bifurcation” of the titles for senators (who in Chapter 9 of the Constitution are still referred to as members of the Federation Council). Insufficient attention to the requirement of consistency of legal norms has led to the creation of a new contradiction between Art. 71 and 72 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Amendments also have a number of other legal and technical defects. Such serious and numerous defects in the legal technique of amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation became a natural result of a steady decline in the quality of federal legislation that has lasted for a long time. Constitutional amendments clearly demonstrate an insufficient level of legal culture in our country, which sharply raises the question of a radical improvement in the quality of legal technology, and legislative technology in particular.

scholarly journals Issues of the Establishment of the Government of the Russian Federation in View of the Constitutional Amendments

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 38-40
Author(s):  
Ruslan M. Dzidzoev ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Prime Minister ◽  
Constitutional Amendments ◽  
Head Of State ◽  
Form Of Government ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government ◽  
Practical Recommendations

The article discusses some issues of the formation of the Government of the Russian Federation, appointment of the Prime Minister of the Russian Federation and members of the Government of the Russian Federation, participation in the process of the head of state and Parliament in accordance with constitutional form of government in Russia, there is a relationship between the ways of forming a Government with the constitutional status of this body, its political potential. The article analyzes the latest amendments to the Constitution of Russia regarding the formation of the Government, and formulates relevant scientific and practical recommendations.

scholarly journals CONSTITUTIONAL CONSOLIDATION OF LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT: THEORETICAL AND LEGAL APPROACH

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 421-431
Author(s):  
A.A. Ivanova
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Power Relations ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Constitutional Amendments ◽  
Municipal Administration ◽  
Basic Law ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Historical Periods

In the article the topical questions of development of local self-government on the basis of requirements of the Constitution of the Russian Federation with the account of constitutional amendments are considered. The author generalizes some discussions of power relations, which are proved by constitutional fixation of local self-government in different historical periods. Theoretical and practical approaches in providing self-government tasks are considered. Attention is focused on revealing problems in legal regulation and law-enforcement practice for applying experience in modern realities. The author characterizes the innovations of the Basic Law, identifying polemical norms. Such as notion and assignment of public authorities, interaction of bodies of state power and bodies of local self-government, participation of federal and regional levels in municipal administration, formation of effective model of organization of activity of bodies of local self-government, offering some ways of solving the examined disputable moments.

Actual problems of development of tourism infrastructure of armenia and russia

Servis plus ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Александр Федулин ◽  
Aleksandr Fedulin
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
State University ◽  
Strategy Of Development ◽  
Russian State ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Tourism Information ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Tourism Potential ◽  
The University ◽  
Tourist Flow

The article describes the main provisions of the report of the rector of Russian State University of Tourism and Service, A. A. Fedulin on the Fourth Russian-Armenian interregional forum. The article reveals the vision of prospects of development of tourist infrastructure as promising areas of cooperation between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Armenia. Tourism is a tool for exploring historical, cultural and spiritual heritage of the Republic of Armenia, which awaken high tourist interest. Tourism is an integral element of Russian-Armenian trade-economic and humanitarian cooperation. The author proposes solutions for the strengthening tourist exchanges between the countries and takes into account the current social and economic conditions and development trends of tourist flow. Also he makes the proposals to build a unified tourism space between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Armenia in the framework of the provisions of the strategy of development of cooperation of States-participants of CIS in the field of tourism for the period up to 2020. There are presented perspectives of expansion of the tourist flow of Russians in the Republic of Armenia in the result of the work on simplification of tourist formalities. The author gives the estimation of the factors limiting accessibility of the tourist product of the Republic of Armenia. As the result, there are proposals on integration in tourism information space of Russia and the promotion of tourism potential of the Republic of Armenia. In this regard, he makes the hypothesis about expediency of use of various channels and ways to increase awareness of tourism products and brands of the Republic of Armenia in Russia. Based on the experience of scientific-research developments of the University, the author shows the possible areas of cooperation, including conducting joint projects on development of tourist complex of the Republic of Armenia, as well as in the field of training and retraining of personnel for tourist industry and infrastructure.

scholarly journals On the issue of institutionalization of the structure of constitutional legislation of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan: existing models and legal distinctiveness

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Т.Ж. Жунусканов
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
State Structure ◽  
Form Of Government ◽  
The Hierarchical Structure ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Law And Legislation

В статье на основе сравнительно-правового анализа рассматривается структура конституционного законодательства Российской Федерации и Республики Казахстан. Автором выделены актуальные проблемы – вопросы институционализации, анализ действующего права, правоприменительной практики и доктрины названных стран, что позволяет говорить о влиянии формы правления и государственного устройства на структуру и содержание Конституции, конституционного законодательства. Выявлены модельные сходства, присутствие в системе права и системе законодательства исследуемых стран властных отношений, с особым выражением в унитарном государстве, с другой – их концептуальные различия, определяющиеся их отдельным содержанием. Результатом анализа является авторское видение иерархической структуры конституционного законодательства Российской Федерации и Республики Казахстан, в зависимости от государственного устройства. The article deals with the comparative legal analysis of the structure of the constitutional legislation of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan. The author has highlighted one of its topical problems – the issues of institutionalization. Analysis and research of the current law, law enforcement practice and doctrine of the named countries allows talking about the influence of the form of government and state structure on the structure and content of the Constitution, constitutional legislation, in particular, as well as their originality. Their model similarities, the presence of a dictatorship of power in the system of law and legislation of the studied countries, with a special expression in a unitary state, are revealed, on the other, their conceptual differences, determined by its individual elements. The result of the analysis is the author's vision of the hierarchical structure of the constitutional legislation of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan, depending on the state structure.

scholarly journals On the nature of Russian statehood

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 6-10
Author(s):  
Виталий Пахомов ◽  
Vitaliy Pakhomov ◽  
Кристина Негру ◽  
Kristina Negro
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
The State ◽  
Basic Properties ◽  
Russian State ◽  
Form Of Government ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
History Of Formation ◽  
Formal Features

The content of the article is devoted to the study of the features of such property of the state as statehood, the specifics of its manifestation on the example of the Russian Federation. The authors come to the conclusion that the Russian state has some formal features of the monarchical form of government, while the legal consolidation of the Republican character. This dualism stems from a complex history of formation and malformatio domestic state and determines the specificity of the state as its basic properties.

scholarly journals Seminar «Policy of National Libraries in the Field of Acquisition of Each Single National Document in a Digital Form»

2014 ◽  
pp. 94-96
Author(s):  
M. P. Kolosova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Digital Libraries ◽  
Republic Of Korea ◽  
Digital Form ◽  
Russian State ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Republic ◽  
State Library ◽  
National Libraries

On the Workshop dedicated to the problems of Digital libraries «Policy of National Libraries in the field of Acquisition of each single National Document in a Digital form», held in the framework of the Program of exchanges between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Korea in Moscow on June 24, 2014 in the Center of Oriental Literature of the Russian State Library.

scholarly journals SEPARATED DAGHESTAN NATIONALITIES (THE LEZGINS, THE TSAKHURS, THE AVARS): POPULATION AND SETTLEMENT PATTERN IN THE END OF THE XIX CENTURY THE BEGINNING OF THE XXI CENTURIES

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (3/2) ◽  
pp. 125-135
Author(s):  
D. Sh. RAMAZANOVA
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
North Caucasus ◽  
Socialist Republic ◽  
Soviet Socialist Republic ◽  
The North ◽  
Russian State ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Xix Century

Being the part of Russia throughout different periods Daghestan had  various administrative and political status (as an oblast being the  part of the empire) an autonomous Republic of the RSFSR (USSR),  as a Republic of the Russian Federation. Upon that, the borders of  Russia as a state were set without regard for the interests of the  nationalities, populating it, but taking into account the interests of  the state exclusively. In the XIX century this policy gave birth to the problem of separation among daghestani nationalities (the  Lezgins, the Tsakhurs, the Avars, the Kumyks) and the Nogais as  well as in 1922-1923 their territory was included on the list of  nationalities – the members of the Daghestan Autonomous Soviet  Socialist Republic, but later it was the issue of exchanges between  the RSFSR subjects. If the problem under discussion was topical  within administrative and territorial borders of the Russian State,  then, by the end of the 20th century it had the status of interstate  problem – the first 3 of the enumerated nationalities were separated  by state borders with the neighboring states of Azerbaijan and the  Republic of Georgia. With the reference to the literary sources and  the results of the demographic census, the author of the article  shows the population changes and the settlement of the Lezgins, the Tsakhurs and the Avars in the Caucasian region in the end of the  20th the beginning of the 21st centuries, continuing the article  serves on the problem of separation among Daghestan nationalities.  In 2011 the problems of the Avars from the Kvarelski region in  Georgia were discussed in the article published in “Izvestya Daghestanskogo Pedagogicheskogo universiteta”, where as  in 2018 the problems of the Nogais, separated by administrative  borders of the Russian Federation subjects on the North Caucasus  were discussed on the pages of the magazine “Society: philosophy,  history, culture”. All the above mentioned ethnic communities are  officially labeled as “title (subject-forming) nationalities” in the  contemporary Republic of Daghestan.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document