scholarly journals Aether Integration

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shad Azmi ◽  
Amal Pushp
Keyword(s):  
Space Time ◽  
Mathematical Formalism ◽  
Quantum Mechanical ◽  
Theory Of Relativity ◽  
Minkowskian Space ◽  
Physical Understanding ◽  
The Universe ◽  
Morley Experiment

In this paper we investigate into the possible resurrection for the aether and it’s compatibility with the theory of relativity. We revisit the Michelson-Morley experiment and expose some of the major inadequacies. In this regard, we have presented the true/corrected form of the Michelson-Morley experiment. We have tried to revise the interpretational aspect of the mathematical formalism regarding the metric of Minkowskian space-time in addendum with it’s relationship to the two theories of time. We herein have also tried to restrain some of the quantum mechanical issues arising from the mainstream understanding of the mathematical formalism of the Minkowskian manifold. Essentially, we have argued in favour of aether to be incorporated into our mathematical formalism as well the physical understanding of the universe.

The Unchanging Universe

2020 ◽  
pp. 72-86
Author(s):  
Demetris Nicolaides
Keyword(s):  
Space Time ◽  
Sense Perception ◽  
Theory Of Relativity ◽  
The Past ◽  
The Future ◽  
Time Continuum ◽  
The Universe ◽  
Block Universe

Heraclitus declares the being (that which exists, nature) but identifies it with becoming, but Parmenides declares just the Being; only what is, is, what is not, is not. All “follows” from that: change, he argues, is logically impossible and so what is, is one and unchangeable! This dazzling absolute monism is in daring disagreement with sense perception, but curiously it has found a well-known genius as a supporter. Emboldened by his theory of relativity, Einstein considers the universe as a four-dimensional “block” (a space-time continuum like a loaf of bread) which, remarkably, contains all moments of time (of past, present, and future) always, and where change is an illusion. He said, “For we convinced physicists, the distinction between past, present, and future is only an illusion, however persistent.” In the block universe, the past is not gone, it is present; and the future, like the present, is, well, present, too.

scholarly journals The universe is expanding by entirely moving at some very high speed and not by flying away of the galaxies from each other

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 78
Author(s):  
Salah Abunayib
Keyword(s):  
High Speed ◽  
World Line ◽  
Space Time ◽  
Point Particle ◽  
Red Shift ◽  
Theory Of Relativity ◽  
Distant Star ◽  
Entire Universe ◽  
The Universe ◽  
The Way

<p>Expansion of the universe has already been confirmed by the Hubble discovered nebular red-shift. But, is it expanding in the simple Newtonian way that the distance between any observed distant star and the observer is continuously increasing? The argument against this is: If so, then the apparent brightness and size of that distant star will continuously decrease and thus the stars at the outer edge of the visible universe will disappear in no time. To understand the way in which the universe is expanding it is important, in accordance with the special theory of relativity, to bear in mind the fundamental difference between the way electromagnetic waves spread and the way Newtonian point particles move. Accordingly, the Hubble discovered nebular red-shift is explained here as due to relative motion between the Newtonian point particle observer, which is moving along with the entire universe, and the space-time fixed origins (Events) of the received pulses of light. But, as the source is also moving with the entire universe, these space-time fixed origins are continuously repeated on the continuous world line of the star and hence the recession is continuously repeated while the star remains at the same fixed distance from the observer.</p>

Discrete Time Flowing and A Contradiction to Einstein’s Assumptions

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 3208-3217
Author(s):  
K.H.K. Geerasee Wijesuriya
Keyword(s):  
String Theory ◽  
Discrete Time ◽  
Special Theory ◽  
Space Time ◽  
Theory Of Relativity ◽  
Special Theory Of Relativity ◽  
Specific Result ◽  
Time Duration ◽  
Velocity Of Light ◽  
The Universe

Due to the limited velocity of light, there is a time duration to propagate a light ray between any two distinct spacetime points in the universe. Upon that argument, author‟s attempt is to obtain a very specific result that may useful for the Cosmology subject fields, string theory and the Astronomy subject fields. The final result implies that the time flowing depends on the space time location and time flowing is a relative fact in the universe. “Time flowing is a relative fact” does not mean the notion in the Special theory of Relativity regarding the relativity in the time.

scholarly journals MØLLER ENERGY–MOMENTUM PRESCRIPTION FOR A LOCALLY ROTATIONALLY SYMMETRIC SPACE–TIME

2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (18) ◽  
pp. 3845-3853 ◽  
Author(s):  
OKTAY AYDOGDU
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Energy Distribution ◽  
Bianchi Type ◽  
Space Time ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Theory Of Relativity ◽  
Locally Rotationally Symmetric ◽  
Rotationally Symmetric ◽  
Teleparallel Theory ◽  
The Universe

The energy distribution in the Locally Rotationally Symmetric (LRS) Bianchi type II space–time is obtained by considering the Møller energy–momentum definition in both Einstein's theory of general relativity and teleparallel theory of relativity. The energy distribution which includes both the matter and gravitational field is found to be zero in both of these different gravitation theories. This result agrees with previous works of Cooperstock and Israelit, Rosen, Johri et al., Banerjee and Sen, Vargas, and Aydogdu and Salti. Our result — the total energy of the universe is zero — supports the view points of Albrow and Tryon.

LRS Bianchi type-I bouncing cosmological models in f(R,T) gravity

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (13) ◽  
pp. 2050203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinod Kumar Bhardwaj ◽  
Archana Dixit
Keyword(s):  
Initial Conditions ◽  
Space Time ◽  
Scale Factor ◽  
Energy Conditions ◽  
Geometrical Parameters ◽  
Type I ◽  
Theory Of Relativity ◽  
Eos Parameter ◽  
Bianchi I ◽  
The Universe

In this work, we have investigated the cosmological bouncing solution in LRS Bianchi-I space-time in framework of [Formula: see text] gravity. Our study in this paper is based on the modeling of matter bounce scenario in which the universe starts with a matter-dominated contraction phase and transitions into an ekpyrotic phase. Mathematical simulations have been done in the modified general theory of relativity in the form of [Formula: see text] theory proposed by Harko et al. [f(R, T) gravity, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 024020], whose functional form is as [Formula: see text] where [Formula: see text] is Ricci scalar, [Formula: see text] is trace of energy–momentum tensor and [Formula: see text] is constant. Taking the non-vanishing scale factor in LRS Bianchi-I space-time, the geometrical parameters such as Hubble parameter and deceleration parameter have been derived and their subsequent use in the expression of pressure, density and EoS parameter [Formula: see text] confirms qualitatively the initial conditions of the universe at the bounce. With the non-vanishing nature of scale factor, initial universe in finite means ruled out the initial singularity problem. The analysis of violation of energy conditions near the bouncing region and stability of the model shows that the matter bounce approach is highly unstable at the bounce but the rapid decay of perturbations away from the bounce supports the stability of the model.

scholarly journals WHY DOES THE STRUGGLE AROUND SRT CONTINUE TO THIS DAY?

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 205-237
Author(s):  
A. Chubykalo ◽  
A. Espinoza ◽  
V. Kuligin ◽  
M. Korneva
Keyword(s):  
Lorentz Transformation ◽  
Relative Motion ◽  
Physical Interpretation ◽  
Reference Frames ◽  
Space Time ◽  
Mathematical Formalism ◽  
Theory Of Relativity ◽  
The Real ◽  
Classical Space ◽  
Historical Methods

The purpose of this article is not to criticize the theory of relativity, but to try to understand why, despite more than a century of dominance in physics, it is constantly criticized by physicists. In this paper, a thorough analysis of A. Einstein's theory of relativity is carried out. It relies on philosophical, physical-mathematical, logical-historical methods of investigation. It is shown that in SRT there is an error in the physical interpretation of the mathematical formalism of the Lorentz transformation (epistemological error). Therefore, the interpretation of the SRT phenomena contains logical contradictions and paradoxes. It is also shown that a consistent interpretation can be given for the Lorentz transformation within the framework of classical space-time representations. It is established that the real speed of the relative motion of inertial reference frames in  is greater than the speed entering the Lorentz transformation. A new explanation is offered for relativistic phenomena without violating logic and without paradoxes. The results are of great importance for the description of relativistic phenomena in physical theories, and also for applied disciplines, for example, for the theory of cyclic accelerators, etc.

scholarly journals A Brief Insight on Simulation and Space-Time

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 6-10
Author(s):  
Reyan Kumar Sapkota
Keyword(s):  
Real Life ◽  
Space Time ◽  
Theory Of Relativity ◽  
General Theory Of Relativity ◽  
Time Analysis ◽  
Research Papers ◽  
Time Model ◽  
Space Time Model ◽  
The Universe ◽  
Young Researchers

Throughout most of human history, events and phenomena of interest have been characterized using space and time as their major characteristic dimensions, in either absolute or relative conceptualizations. Space–Time analysis seeks to understand when and where (and sometimes why) things occur. Ever since Einstein introduced this topic in his “General Theory of Relativity” (a remarkable feat) in 1915, many explanations, assumptions about Space-Time have been published. The authentic archives of Space-Time have helped us to predict and express the ongoing spatial phenomena of the Universe. The strangeness of Space-Time forces Young Researchers and Physicists to study upon the current predictions and theories, sink into the ocean of Space-Time mystery and come up with their own predictions. Besides Space-Time, the predictions about us being in a Simulation is a recent concept. Nick Bostrom’s trilemma “the Simulation argument”, published in 2003 led to the commencement of further oddly satisfying, real life evidence enriched, research papers. “Two possibilities exist: either we are alone in the Universe or we are not. Both are equally terrifying.”- by Andrew C Clarke. Throughout the paper, the Loaf Space-Time model and brief insights on other hypotheses about the structure of the mysterious space-time will be presented with insightful examples, authentic research outcomes, which will be linked with the Simulation Hypothesis.

Philosophy and Cosmology

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claus Beisbart
Keyword(s):  
Twentieth Century ◽  
General Theory ◽  
Space Time ◽  
Human Knowledge ◽  
Theory Of Relativity ◽  
General Theory Of Relativity ◽  
The World ◽  
High Standards ◽  
The Universe

Cosmological questions (e.g., how far the world extends and how it all began) have occupied humans for ages and given rise to numerous conjectures, both within and outside philosophy. To put to rest fruitless speculation, Kant argued that these questions move beyond the limits of human knowledge. This article begins with Kant’s doubts about cosmology and shows that his arguments presuppose unreasonably high standards on knowledge and unwarranted assumptions about space-time. As an analysis of the foundations of twentieth-century cosmology reveals, other worries about the discipline can be avoided too if the universe is modeled using Einstein’s general theory of relativity. There is now strong observational support for one particular model. However, due to underdetermination problems, the big cosmological questions cannot be fully answered using this model either. This opens the space for more speculative proposals again (e.g., that the universe is only part of a huge multiverse).

scholarly journals A Brief Insight on Simulation and Space-Time

2021 ◽  
pp. 6-10
Author(s):  
Reyan Kumar Sapkota ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Real Life ◽  
Space Time ◽  
Theory Of Relativity ◽  
General Theory Of Relativity ◽  
Time Analysis ◽  
Research Papers ◽  
Time Model ◽  
Space Time Model ◽  
The Universe ◽  
Young Researchers

Throughout most of human history, events and phenomena of interest have been characterized using space and time as their major characteristic dimensions, in either absolute or relative conceptualizations. Space–Time analysis seeks to understand when and where (and sometimes why) things occur. Ever since Einstein introduced this topic in his “General Theory of Relativity” (a remarkable feat) in 1915, many explanations, assumptions about Space-Time have been published. The authentic archives of Space-Time have helped us to predict and express the ongoing spatial phenomena of the Universe. The strangeness of Space-Time forces Young Researchers and Physicists to study upon the current predictions and theories, sink into the ocean of Space-Time mystery and come up with their own predictions. Besides Space-Time, the predictions about us being in a Simulation is a recent concept. Nick Bostrom’s trilemma “the Simulation argument”, published in 2003 led to the commencement of further oddly satisfying, real life evidence enriched, research papers. “Two possibilities exist: either we are alone in the Universe or we are not. Both are equally terrifying.”- by Andrew C Clarke. Throughout the paper, the Loaf Space-Time model and brief insights on other hypotheses about the structure of the mysterious space-time will be presented with insightful examples, authentic research outcomes, which will be linked with the Simulation Hypothesis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document