scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN CONCEPT ATTAINMENT TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN KOMUNIKASI DAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP SISWA PADA MATERI SISTEM REPRODUKSI

Biosfer ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yulilina Retno ◽  
Rusdi Rusdi ◽  
Amalia Amalia

Students need to have one of the science process skills in learning which is communication skill. Based on observation it was known that not every student had the same communication capabilities, both in oral and written. This is due to lack of student’s understanding about the concept of the material which being studied. Application of Concept Attainment learning model was expected to train students how to construct concepts on their own and be able to express it verbally. This study was aimed to determine the influence of the Concept Attainment learning model to communication skills and student’s understanding of Reproductive System material concept. This research was conducted in SMA Negeri 16 Jakarta on May 2015. This research used quasi-experimental method. The sample were 30 students each in the experimental class and control class by using simple random sampling. The instrument for this research was a written communication skills post test, understanding of concepts post test, and the observation of verbal ability. The analysis prerequisite test was the test of normality with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and homogeneity test with F test. Based on the calculations, the data were normally distributed and homogeneous. Hypothesis test using the test results showed that Ho was rejected at α 0.05. It means that there was an influence of Concept Attainment learning model of the communication skills and student’s understanding concept on Reproductive System.

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 21-27
Author(s):  
Lasmi Lasmi ◽  
Masri Masri

AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini adalah mengetahui perbedaan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa antara model discovery learning dan jigsaw. Jenis penelitian adalah eksperimen semu. Tempat penelitian diaksanakan di SMP Negeri 18 Kota Bengkulu. Populasi pada penelitian seluruh siswa kelas VII. Sampel penelitian dipilih secara acak sederhana yaitu kelas VII.1 sebagai kelas eksperimen 1, pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model discovery learning, kelas VII.5 sebagai kelas eksperimen 2, pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw, dan kelas VII.3 sebagai kelas kontrol, pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa kelas eksperimen 1 memperoleh nilai rata-rata tes akhir (post-test) kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa yaitu 12,13, nilai rata-rata eksperimen 2 yaitu 11,45, dan nilai rata-rata kelas kontrol yaitu 9,26. Berdasarkan hasil analisis uji anava satu jalur, dengan signifikan 0,05 diperoleh 𝐹ℎ𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑛𝑔 = 𝐹𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑙 = 0,34, maka H0 ditolak. Artinya ada perbedaan signifikan rata-rata kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa pada kelas eksperimen 1, kelas eksperimen 2, dan kelas kontrol. Berdasarkan uji beda nyata (BNT) menunjukan bahwa pembelajaran yang memberikan hasil penalaran matematis yang berbeda adalah model pembelajaran discovery learning dengan konvensional, dan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw dengan konvensional. Sedangkan pembelajaran dengan model discovery learning dan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw tidak memberikan hasil kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa yang berbeda. Model discovery learning dan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw memberikan hasil lebih baik bila dibandingkan dengan model konvensional.Kata kunci: kemampuan penalaran matematis, model discovery learning, model Jigsaw AbstractThe purpose of this study was to determine students' mathematical reasoning abilities with discovery learning models and jigsaw type cooperative learning models. This type of research is quasi-experimental research. The population in this study were all students of class VII SMP Negeri 18 Bengkulu City in the   academic year 2019/2020. The sample of this study was selected by simple random sampling, namely class VII.1 as experimental class 1 using the discovery learning models, class VII.5 as experimental class 2 using the jigsaw type cooperative learning models, and class VII.3 as control class using conventional learning models. Data were collected by means of tests of students' mathematical reasoning abilities. Based on the results of the one-way ANOVA test, there are significant differences in students' mathematical reasoning abilities in the experimental class 1, experiment class 2 and the control class. The results          of the real difference test (BNT) show that learning that gives different results is the discovery learning models with conventional learning models, and the jigsaw type cooperative learning model with conventional learning models. Meanwhile, learning with discovery learning models and jigsaw type cooperative learning models does not give different results for students' mathematical reasoning abilities. Discovery learning models and jigsaw type cooperative learning models give better results when compared to conventional learning.Keywords: mathematical   reasoning   ability,   discovery   learning   model,   Jigsaw   model


Author(s):  
M. Yunan HS ◽  
Ayu Pratiwi

Abstrak: Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan eksperimen dalam bentuk quasi eksperimen. Berdasarkan hipotesis yang diajukan peneliti, untuk melakukan penelitian terhadap yang diajukan peneliti, peneiti menggunakan pendekatan quasi eksperimen dengan desain non randomize pretes-posttest  control group.Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui Studi tentang hasil belajar PKn siswa kelas XI SMAN 2 WOHA Bima menggunakan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing dengan model pembelajaran inkuiri training  Tahun pelajaran 2016/2017, Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah semua siswa kelas XI SMAN 2 Woha. Sampel penelitian diambil dengan teknik simple random sampling dengan cara undian, kelas XI IPA 2 ditentukan sebagai eksperimen dan kelas XI IPA 3 sebagai kelas kontrol. Instrumen yang digunakan berupa tes objektif dalam bentuk pilihan ganda yang telah diuji kelayakannya sebanyak 30 soal, terdapat 20 soal yang valid, dimana 20 soal pre-test dan 20 soal post-test yang telah diuji kelayakkannya.Teknik analisis data digunakan uji persyaratan analisis yang meliputi uji homogenitas dan uji normalitas, sedangkan uji hipotesis yang digunakan adalah uji t-tes. Berdasarkan hasil perhitungan uji normalitas post-test data diperoleh x2hitung= 5,144  dan x2tabel = 11,070 denganx2hitung= 5.144 dan x2tabel =11.070. Karena x2hitung< x2tabelmaka kedua sampel berdistribusi normal pada taraf signifikan 5%. Berdasarkan hasil perhitungan uji homogenitas post-test data diperoleh fhitung= 1.24  dan ftabel = 2,04. Karena fhitung< ftabelmaka varians kedua sampel homogen. Pada uji hipotesis uji t-tes diperoleh nilai post-test thitung = 14.559 dan ttebel = 2,000 (thitung > ttebel) dengan tthitung = 14.559 dan ttebel = 2,000 yang menunjukan hipotesis nol (Ho) ditolak dan hipotesis alternatif (Ha) diterima, sehingga terdapat perbedaan. Penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa ada Perbedaan Studi tentang hasil belajar pkn siswa kelas XI SMAN 2 WOHA Bima menggunakan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing dengan model pembelajaran inkuiri training  Tahun pelajaran 2016/2017. Abstract:  This research represent quantitative research by using approach of experiment in the form of experiment quasi. Pursuant to raised by hypothesis is researcher, to conduct research to which is raised by researcher, researcher use approach of experiment quasi with desain of non group control pretes-posttest randomize.Target of this research is to know Influence Between Model Study Of Inkuiri Guided With Model Study Of Inkuiri Training To Result Learn PKn Student Class of XI SMAN 2 Woha School Year 2016/2017. Population in this research is all class student of XI SMAN 2 Woha. Research Sampel taken with technique of simple sampling random by toss, class of XI IPA 2 determined as class experiment and class of XI IPA 3 as control class. used instrument in the form of objective tes in the form of double helix which have been tested by elegibility of him counted 30 problem, there are 20 valid problem, where 20 problem of pre-test and 20 problem of post-test which have been tested him.Technique analyse data used by test conditions of analysis covering homogeneity test and test of normalitas, while hypothesis test the used is test t. Pursuant to result of calculation of test of normalitas data post-test obtained. x2count = 5,144  and  x2table= 11,070 with x2count = 5.144 and x2table=11.070. Because x2count < x2table  hence both sampel  have normal distribution to at level of signifikan 5%. Pursuant to result of calculation of homogeneity test of post-test data obtained. fcount = 1.24  and ftable= 2,04. Because fcount < ftable hence varians both of homogeneous sampel. At test hypothesis test t-test post-test is obtained by value  tcount = 14.559 and tteble = 2,000 (tcount> ttable) with tcount = 14.559 and tteble = 2,000 which is hypothesis showing zero (Ho) refused and alternative hypothesis (Ha) accepted, so that there are difference. This research can be concluded by that there is Difference Of Influence Between Model Study Of Inkuiri Guided With Model Study Of Inkuiri Training To Result Learn PKN Student Class of XI SMAN 2 Woha School Year 2016.


Author(s):  
Imanuel Alan Onibala ◽  
Parsaoran Tamba ◽  
Denny Maukkar

ABSTRAK. Media pendidikan sebagai salah satu sarana meningkatkan mutu pendidikan sangat penting dalam proses PBM. Penggunaan media pendidikan dapat memperbaiki PBM siswa yang pada gilirannya dapat meningkatkan hasil belajar yang dicapainya. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) terhadap hasil siswa pada mata pelajaran Motor Bensin kelas XI di SMK Negeri 1 Motoling. Penelitian ini dikategorikan dalam penelitian Eksperimen Semu (quasi exsperimental). Desain penelitian yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah desain jenis pre-test dan post-test group design. Berdasarkan uji hipotesis diperoleh nilai t hitung sebesar 4,4360 dan nilai t tabel 1,6772 artinya  nilai t hitung lebih besar dari t tabel maka signifikan. Hasil tersebut menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan pada penggunaan model pembelajaran Kooperatif TAI (Team Assisted Individualization)  dan konvensional terhadap pencapaian hasil belajar siswa di SMK N 1 Motoling. Kata Kunci: Hasil Belajar, Team Assisted Individualization.   ABSTRACT. Educational media as a means of improving the quality of education is very important in the PBM process. The use of educational media can improve students' PBM which in turn can improve the learning outcomes they achieve. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) cooperative learning model on student outcomes in the XI class of gasoline motorbike subjects at SMK Negeri 1 Motoling. This research is categorized as a quasi-experimental research. The research design used in this study was a pre-test and post-test group design. Based on the hypothesis test, the t value is 4.4360 and the t table value is 1.6772, which means that the t value is greater than the t table, so it is significant. These results indicate that there is a significant difference in the use of the cooperative learning model TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) and conventional to the achievement of student learning outcomes at SMK N 1 Motoling. Keywods: Learning Outcomes, Team Assisted Individualization.


2022 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 52-57
Author(s):  
Imanuel Alan Onibala ◽  
I. Parsaoran Tamba ◽  
Denny Maukar

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) terhadap hasil siswa pada mata pelajaran Motor Bensin kelas XI di SMK Negeri 1 Motoling. Penelitian ini dikategorikan dalam penelitian Eksperimen Semu (quasi exsperimental). Desain penelitian yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah desain jenis pre-test dan post-test group design. Berdasarkan uji hipotesis diperoleh nilai t hitung sebesar 4,4360 dan nilai t tabel 1,6772 artinya  nilai t hitung lebih besar dari t tabel maka signifikan. Hasil tersebut menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan pada penggunaan model pembelajaran Kooperatif TAI (Team Assisted Individualization)  dan konvensional terhadap pencapaian hasil belajar siswa di SMK N 1 Motoling.     Kata Kunci: Hasil Belajar, Team Assisted Individualization. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) cooperative learning model on student outcomes in the XI class of gasoline motorbike subjects at SMK Negeri 1 Motoling. This research is categorized as a quasi-experimental research. The research design used in this study was a pre-test and post-test group design. Based on the hypothesis test, the t value is 4.4360 and the t table value is 1.6772, which means that the t value is greater than the t table, so it is significant. These results indicate that there is a significant difference in the use of the cooperative learning model TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) and conventional to the achievement of student learning outcomes at SMK N 1 Motoling.           Keywods: Learning Outcomes, Team Assisted Individualization.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Uci Sulistiarini ◽  
Hairida Hairida ◽  
Fitriani Fitriani

ABSTRACTThis study aimed to find out students’ communication skills after using cooperative learning model type pair checks and by lecturing and discussion method, to know the difference of students’ learning results after using cooperative learning model type pair checks and by lecturing and discussion method, and also to know the effectiveness of usng cooperative learning model type pair checks. It is a quasi experimental. Research used simple random sampling technique in taking the sample. The analysis of students learning results reported that the mean of students in experimental class 86,94 % is higher than the mean of students in control class 64,30 %. The analysis of students communication skills results reported that the percentage of students communication skills in experimental class 84% is higher than the percentage of students’ communication skills in control class 65%. The result of statistic test with α = 5 % the value is 0,00 which is lower than α (0,00<0,005). It means that there are some differences between esperimental class and control class. Effect size showed ES = 1,22 categorized as high, which means that cooperative learning model type pair checks affect significantly to students’ learning results as 38,69%.Keywords: Learning results, communication skills, Solubility and Solubility Product, Type of Pair Checks


Author(s):  
Aprayanti Nasution ◽  
Nelda Azhar ◽  
Sukaya Sukaya

The problem of the research is the low learning results of the students on the subjects of computer systems of SMK Negeri 5 Padang. This is due to several factors one of which is the method or strategy learning that is less innovative. The purpose of the research is to know the difference of result the study by using cooperative learning model of type Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) on the subjects of a computer system class X TKJ of  SMK Negeri 5 Padang. This type of research is experimental. Where is to take the sampling by using random sampling technique. As the experimental class is class X TKJ A which will be treated by using cooperative learning model type STAD and control class is X TKJ B which will be treated by using inquiry model of learning. The technique of collecting data from post test, then analyzed for homogeneity test, normality test and hypothesis test. From the experimental class research results get the average value 82, 29, while the control class gets an average value of 76.93. The result of hypothesis calculation at significant level α = 0,05 got  thitung> ttabel  that is (2,182> 2,056) Because thitung  is bigger than ttabel hence hypothesis (H0) rejected and hypothesis (Ha) accepted. From the calculation of the learning result Gain where O1 is the average of the experimental class and O2 is the control class, the percentage of learning result is increased by 6.79%. It can be concluded that by using cooperative learning model of Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) type has an effect on student learning result which proves from improvement of learning result. Keyword    : Learning Resultss, Cooperative Learning Model TypeSTAD, Inquiry Learning Model.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Stela Ruhulessin ◽  
Tanwey Gerson Ratumanan ◽  
Hanisa Tamalene

This study aims to determine whether there are differences in learning outcomes of class X students of SMA 12 Ambon using cooperative learning model Student Facilitator and Explaining (SFE) and conventional learning models on trigonometric material. The type of research is experimental research (Experimental Research) with the Post-Test Only Control Group Design. The analysis technique is descriptive statistical analysis and inferential test statistics consisting of normality test data, homogeneity test and hypothesis test. The data are processed using SPSS version 20.0. The results of this study are (1) there are differences in learning outcomes using the cooperative learning model Student Facilitator and Explaining and conventional learning models, which shows that the value of  t_hitung  3.1128 is greater than the value of t_tabel  2.0003 and the value of Sig. (2-tailed) smaller than the value of alpha 0.05 which is 0.002; (2) learning outcomes of students who use the cooperative learning model Student Facilitator and Explaining type are better when compared to those using conventional learning models


Author(s):  
M. Ridho Fadillah ◽  
Delsina Faiza ◽  
Thamrin Thamrin

This research was focus on the low of student’s learning outcome, specially on Basic Electricity and Electronics subject at SMKN 1 Sumatera Barat. The objective is to reveal the comparisons of applying inquiry learning model and problem based learning model to the subject. By using Quasi experimental with simple random sampling; one of probability sampling tecnique, the Inqury model was enducted in experiment class and The Other class where PBL learning model, was also implemented to compare the treatment. The primary data was collected by structured  test (Pre-test and Post-test) according to basic competences described of the subject. based on the t-test result, complying the pre-requisite test such as normalityexamination, this research found that t0≥t ≥ t0 (-2,052 ≥ 2,55  ≥  2,052). However, the result has shown that inquiry learning model is providing better student’s learning outcome than PBL model. Therefore, the inquiry model is more effective than PBL model as research conclusion.Keywords: learning outcomes, learning model, Inquiry, Problem Based Learning.


Author(s):  
Elvi Syukri ◽  
Ilmiyati Rahmy Jasril

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the application of the Cooperative Learning model of the Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) type to the learning outcomes of Basic Electricity and Electronics in class X TAV students at SMKN 1 Kinali. This type of research is a quasi experiment with a randomized control group only design. The sampling technique uses Simple Random Sampling. The research sample XTAV1 (control class) is applied to the conventional learning model and XTAV2 (experimental class) is applied to the TAI learning model. The research data are the posttest value of the experimental and control class. Then the normality test, homogeneity test and hypothesis test were analyzed. Based on the research data, the mean value of the control class was 76,30 and the experiment was 84,10. Hypothesis test results at a significant level α = 0,05 obtained tcount 3,14 and ttable 1,69 (tcount>ttable) can be identified Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. The test results provide an interpretation of the significant influence of learning outcomes by applying the TAI learning model in the subjects of Basic Electricity and Electronics class X TAV in SMK N 1 Kinali. Keywords:TAI Learning Model, quasi experiment, Learning Outcomes


2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elmina S. Panjaitan ◽  
Sahyar .

ABSTRACT The objective of this research was to analysis the Cooperative Learning Model to student’s learning outcomes by using cooperative learning model Group Investigation type to conceptual knowledge. In experimental class used cooperative learning model GI type while in the control class used conventional learning model. In each class used pre-test and post-test, after that was done the data analysis technique like average value, standard deviation, normality test, homogeneity test, hypothesis test. The results were showed the increasing of student learning outcomes that used model GI type in conceptual knowledge with post-test value was higher 78.37 in the class experiment than 69.68 in the control class, the active of students and then the conceptual knowledge when the model of GI type were happened. From the research get the conclusion that there was effect of Cooperative learning model Group Investigation type to conceptual knowledge students. Key word : Cooperative, Group Investigation, Conceptual Knowledge, Student’s Learning Outcome.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document