scholarly journals The Effect of Synectic Learning Models in Developing Student Creativity

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-94
Author(s):  
Yulia Pramusinta ◽  
Farah Destria Rifanah

In the 21st century, one of the learning outcomes that students must have is creativity. Creating creative human resources can be through education or learning, one of which is by using a synectic learning model. The synectic learning model has a syntax that can foster student creativity. This study aimed to examine differences in the creative learning outcomes of students who are taught with the synectic model and students who learn using conventional learning models. The research method used is quasi-experimental. This research was conducted in January-February 2020. The population of this study was students in grade 3 at MI Bahrul Ulum Blawi with Indonesian subjects. The sampling method used was cluster random sampling. In this study, the sample was 2 classes using random sample sampling, one class as a control class taught using conventional methods, and one class as an experimental class taught using the synectic learning model. The number of research subjects in the experimental class was 22 students, and the control class consisted of 20 students. The research analysis used an independent sample t-test. The study results concluded that there was an influence between the synectic learning model on students' creativity in Indonesian lessons.

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 88
Author(s):  
Mendarissan Aritonang ◽  
Abdul Hamid K ◽  
Julaga Situmorang

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan :(1) Untuk mengetahui hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TST lebih tinggi dari mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT. (2) Untuk mengetahui hasil belajar  pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis dan mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis. (3) Untuk mengetahui interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  terhadap hasil belajar pengantar bisnis. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di Universitas Methodist Indonesia. Populasi berjumlah 180 orang. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian kuasi eksperimen dengan desain faktorial 2 x 2 dilanjutkan dengan statistik inferensial dengan menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur dengan taraf signifikan α = 0,05 yang dilanjutkan dengan uji Scheffe. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TSTS lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT; (2) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis; (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar mahasiswa.  Kata Kunci: model pembelajaran kooperatif, TST, NHT, gaya belajar, pengantar bisnis.  Abstract: This study aims: (1) To find out the introductory learning outcomes of business students who are taught with the cooperative learning model of the TST type are higher than students who are taught with the cooperative learning model of the NHT type. (2) To find out the introductory learning outcomes of business students who have theoretical learning styles and students who have pragmatic learning styles. (3) To determine the interaction between cooperative learning models with learning styles on introductory business learning outcomes. This research was conducted at the Methodist University of Indonesia. The population is 180 people. Sampling was done by cluster random sampling. Quasi-experimental research method with 2 x 2 factorial design followed by inferential statistics using two-way ANAVA with a significant level α = 0.05 followed by the Scheffe test. The results showed: (1) the results of introductory business learning students who were taught with the cooperative learning model type TSTS were higher than the results of introductory business learning students who were taught with the NHT type cooperative learning model; (2) the results of introductory business learning students who have theoretical learning styles are higher than the results of introductory business learning students who have pragmatic learning styles; (3) there is an interaction between cooperative learning models and learning styles in influencing student learning outcomes. Keywords: cooperative learning model, TST, NHT, learning style, business introduction.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 70-79
Author(s):  
Arnold Sahalessy ◽  
J L Kundre ◽  
Ferdinanda S Noya

This study aims to determine (1) the application of the project based learning model in PUBLIC SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL 4 Ambon, (2) the application of cooperation skills in Public Senior High School 4 Ambon, (3) the results of sociology learning in Public Senior High School 4 Ambon, (4) the effect of the application of the learning model project based on learning in Public Senior High School 4 Ambon, (5) the effect of applying cooperative skills in Public Senior High School 4 Ambon, (6) the effect of applying the project based learning model of learning and collaborative skills together on the results of learning sociology at Public Senior High School 4 Ambon. This study used a quasi-experimental research design. The research subjects in this study were 60 students in grade XI IIS. The results of this study indicate that (1) there are significant differences in sociology learning outcomes between groups of students taught with project based learning models and think pair share learning models, (2) there are significant differences in sociology learning outcomes between students who have high and low cooperation skills (3) high and low cooperation skills show no interaction with sociology learning outcomes, (4) Learning model (Project Based Learning and Think-Pair-Share) with cooperation skills show significant interactions with sociology learning outcomes


Author(s):  
Sartika Sepriyani ◽  
Rayandra Asyhar ◽  
Asrial Asrial

The ability to solve problems is a skill that students need to have in dealing with various problems in life. This study aims to determine the effect of problem based learning models; cognitive styles and interaction between both factors on science learning outcomes of students in class VII of MTs 2 Tanjung Jabung Timur in academic year 2015/2016. This research was conducted with a quasi-experimental research method by applying a 2 × 2 factorial design. The study sample consisted of an experimental class of 30 students and a control class of 29 students. Data collection was conducted using two types of instruments, namely the Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT) to measure students cognitive styles and students' learning outcomes test in essay forms. The Problem Based Learning model affect the learning outcomes, there is significant difference in science learning outcomes between students who have Cognitive field dependent (FD) style that is taught by the Problem Based Learning model and students who have Cognitive FD style that is taught by conventional learning models. The results show that the value of the experimental class post-test is higher than that of the control class. In short, the experimental class with the application of the Problem Based Learning model in the learning process provides higher learning outcomes than that of the conventional models.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 95
Author(s):  
Nurul Huda Arianti ◽  
Syubhan Annur ◽  
Mastuang Mastuang

Student learning outcomes is still less than optimal or unsatisfactory, it can be known through the data replication midterm class XI IPA at SMAN 9 Banjarmasin. This happens because the learning methods and models used by teachers based on observations during the learning tend to be monotonous and less engaging students, so that students are less enthusiastic and less active in the following study. This study aims to determine whether there are differences in learning outcomes of students using cooperative learning model Pair Check with the type of Think Pair Square in class XI SMA Negeri 9 Banjarmasin. This type of research used in this research is quantitative quasi-experimental research design. This study population is all students in grade XI IPA at SMAN 9 Banjarmasin. Samples were taken using cluster random sampling. Data collection techniques are techniques achievement test and documentation. The results showed that there are differences in learning outcomes of students using cooperative learning model Pair Check with the type of Think Pair Square in class XI SMA Negeri 9 Banjarmasin.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-31
Author(s):  
Eka Putri Kartini Pasaribu ◽  
Samsidar Tanjung ◽  
Edidon Hutasuhut

This study aims to find out the use of inquiry learning models and conventional learning models in student IPS learning outcomes, to know the differences in IPS learning outcomes of students who have high learning independence with students who have low learning independence, and to know the interaction between the learning model and the independence of learning to the student's IPS learning outcomes. This research is a quasi-experimental study with the research population is all grade IV students as many as 60 students with samples are all grade IV students (A and B) who take IPS subjects. From the research, it was produced that the inquiry learning model is higher than the use of conventional learning model shown by Fcount = 3.86 > Ftable = 2.77 at a significant level a= 0.05. IPS learning outcomes of students who have higher learning independence than students who have low learning independence indicated by Fcount = 3.74 > Ftable = 2.77 at a significant level a= 0.05. There is an interaction between the learning model and the independence of learning to the student's IPS learning outcomes indicated by Fcount = 3.64 > Ftable = 2.77 at a significant level a= 0.05. The conclusion of this study shows that inquiry learning is better used for students who have high learning independence while conventional learning models are well used for students who have low learning independence in order to have interactions between learning models and self-reliance learning.


Author(s):  
Lingga Nico Pradana

<p>The purpose of this research was to determine the effect of learning models to student achievement. Learning models compared between NHT-CTL, NHT and direct instruction. Method of research used quasi experimental with the factorial design of 3x1. Population of this research was all students class VIII in SMP Negeri at Madiun City. The sampling technique using a stratified cluster random sampling. Samples in this research were 266 students with 91 students as experimental class I, 88 students as experimental class II and 87 students as control class. Data collection methods used documentation and test.Hypothesis testing was performed using one-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. Based on the results of hypothesis testwere concluded that NHT-CTL learning model gave better achievement than NHT learning model and direct instruction, while NHT learning model and direct instruction gave the same achievement. </p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 52
Author(s):  
Arie Purwa Kusuma ◽  
Irma Susanty

AbstractThe aim of the research was to find out the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement. The learning model compared were NHT(Numbered Head Together), snowball throwing and convensional. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental by 3×1 factorial design. The population was the eight grade student of junior high school in Cibinong district on academic year 2017/2018. The sampling tecnique was cluster random sampling. The size of the sampel was 103 students consisted of 36 students in the first experimental group, 34  students in the second experimental group and 33 students in third experimental group. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test. The data was analyzed using unbalanced one-way analysis of variance. The conclusions of the research was NHT learning model gives better mathematics achievement than Snowball Throwing and convensional learning model, and snowball throwing learning model give better mathematics achievement than convensional learning model.Keywords: NHT, Snowball throwing, mathematics achievement


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 73
Author(s):  
Vina Susanti ◽  
Harun Sitompul ◽  
Hamonangan Tambunan

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan (1) untuk mengetahui hasil belajar keterampilan membaca bahasa Arab siswa yang diajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran mind mapping lebih tinggi daripada siswa yang diajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran langsung, (2) untuk mengetahui hasil belajar keterampilan membaca bahasa Arab siswa yang memiliki motivasi intrinsik tinggi lebih tinggi daripada siswa yang memiliki motivasi intrinsik rendah, (3) untuk mengetahui interaksi antara model pembelajaran dengan motivasi intrinsik terhadap hasil belajar keterampilan membaca bahasa Arab. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2 x 2. Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikan  = 0,05. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa; (1) hasil belajar keterampilan membaca bahasa Arab siswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran mind mapping lebih tinggi dari hasil belajar siswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran langsung dengan  = 6,08 >  = 3,97, (2) hasil belajar keterampilan membaca bahasa Arab siswa yang memiliki motivasi intrinsik tinggi lebih tinggi dari siswa yang memiliki motivasi intrinsik rendah dengan  = 60,34 >  = 3,97, (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan motivasi intrinsik terhadap hasil belajar keterampilan membaca bahasa Arab, dengan  = 28,92 >  = 3,97.  Kata Kunci: model pembelajaran, motivasi intrinsic, keterampilan membaca bahasa arab Abstract: This study aims (1) to determine the learning outcomes of Arabic reading skills students who are taught using mind mapping learning models are higher than students who are taught using direct learning models, (2) to find out the learning outcomes of Arabic reading skills students who have higher intrinsic motivation than students who have low intrinsic motivation, (3) to find out the interaction between learning models and intrinsic motivation on the learning outcomes of Arabic reading skills. This research is a quasi-experimental research with 2 x 2 factorial research design. Data analysis techniques using two-way ANAVA at a significant level = 0.05. Research findings indicate that; (1) the learning outcomes of Arabic reading skills students taught with mind mapping learning models are higher than the learning outcomes of students taught with direct learning models with F count = 6.08 > F table = 3.97, (2) learning outcomes of students' Arabic reading skills those who have high intrinsic motivation are higher than students who have low intrinsic motivation with F count = 60.34 > F table = 3.97, (3) there is an interaction between the learning model and intrinsic motivation towards the learning outcomes of Arabic reading skills, with F count = 28.92> F table = 3.97. Keywords: learning model, intrinsic motivation, Arabic reading skills


Eksponen ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-79
Author(s):  
Venty Meilasari

This research aimed to find out: (1) which one providing better mathematics learning outcomes, GI model or direct learning model, (2) which one providing better mathematics learning outcomes, the high, medium or low learning independence students, (3) interaction between learning models and learning independence on mathematics learning outcomes. This research used the quasi-experimental research method with 2×3 factorial design. The population were all students of the 8 th class of SMP Negeri 6 Surakarta on academic year 2015/2016. The sample was taken using purposive sampling. The instruments used were learning independence questionnaire and mathematics learning outcomes test. The proposed hypothesis of the research were analyzed by using two-way analysis of variance. The conclusions of this research were as follow. (1) GI model provided better mathematics outcomes than direct learning model. (2) The high learning independence student had better mathematics learning outcomes than medium and low learning independence students, and the medium had as good as low learning independence students. (3) there was no interaction between learning models and learning independence on mathematics learning outcomes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Desi Anggraini

This article aims to determine the differences in the results of learning mathematics by using the appropriate learning model in the application of cooperative learning model Number Head Type Togeteher (NHT) and Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) on the subject of Circles at MTs Muhammadiyah Penyasawan, Kampar District. In this research the problem statement is "Are there differences in learning outcomes of mathematics using Cooperative learning models Number Head Together (NHT) and Student Achievement Division (STAD) types in class VIII MTs Muhammadiyah Penyasawan Kampar District on the subject of Circles?" This article uses comparative research which found a difference between the use of Cooperative learning models Number Head Together (NHT) and Student Achievement Division (STAD) types, in this study the researchers played a direct role as teachers in the learning process. In this study Cooperative Learning NHT type is X1 and STAD type is X2 variable and learning result is Y variable. The population of this study is all Muhammadiyah MTS students and the sample used is VIIIA class as a class using Cooperative Learning Type Number Head Together (NHT) and class VIIIB as a class that uses Student Team Achievement Divison (STAD) Type Learning Model. The research subjects were eighth grade eighth grade students and the object was learning outcomes using the cooperative learning type NHT model and learning outcomes using the STAD learning model. The data collection technique is in the form of observation, documentation and tests conducted at the sixth meeting after the learning meeting is complete. This data is processed using the test-t formula and obtained a t value of 4.115 with a significant value of 2.69 where the significant value obtained from the calculation is greater than the significance level α = 0.05, then Ha is accepted. Based on the results of the data analysis, it was concluded that there were differences in the mathematics learning outcomes of students using the Cooperative learning model Number Head Together (NHT) and Student Achievement Division (STAD) types on the subject of the Circle at MTs Muhammadiyah Penyasawan Kampar Distric


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document