scholarly journals Comparison of IgA, IgG and neutralizing antibody responses following immunization with Moderna, BioNTech, AstraZeneca, Sputnik-V, Johnson and Johnson, and Sinopharm’s COVID-19 vaccines.

Author(s):  
Tomabu Adjobimey ◽  
Julia Meyer ◽  
Leander Sollberg ◽  
Michael Bawolt ◽  
Christina Berens ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUNDSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and the resulting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have afflicted millions of people in a worldwide pandemic. Several vaccines have been developed to prevent infection and illness. However, the safety and efficacy of most of the vaccines currently available are still being questioned by part of the public opinion. Even if vaccine-resistant individuals represent a minority in most countries, their hesitancy is sufficient to delay the highly desired ‘herd-immunity threshold.’ METHODSIn an ongoing multinational trial, we collected blood samples from 365 adults, 18 years of age or older, vaccinated with mRNA vaccines (Moderna, BioNTech), viral DNA-vectored vaccines (AstraZeneca, Sputnik-V, and Johnson and Johnson), or the attenuated virus vaccine from Sinopharm. Out of the 365 vaccinated individuals included in the study, 41 received two doses of Moderna Biotech's Spikevax, 92 received two doses of BioNTech’s Comirnaty, 52 were vaccinated with two doses of Oxford-AstraZeneca’s Vaxzevria, 34 received one dose of Johnson and Johnson’s Jansen, 35 two doses of Gamaleja’s Sputnik-V and 28 two doses of Sinopharm’s BBIBP-CorV. In addition, 40 received a prime dose of AstraZeneca followed by BioNTech as a booster, whereas 43 received Moderna’s vaccine as a booster after a prime dose of AstraZeneca. After collecting reactogenicity data, the expression of S-Protein binding IgG and IgA were analyzed before and after full vaccination in each group using an automated sandwich ELISA system. In addition, the neutralizing capacity of sera from individuals from all groups was investigated using an ACE-2-RBD neutralizing assay. RESULTSThe main side effects reported included short-term mild-to-moderate pain at the injection site, fatigue, and headache. More severe side effects were reported by vaccinees in the Moderna (10%), AstraZeneca (11%), Johnson and Johnson (5.9%), and Sputnik-V (7.2%) groups. No severe adverse reaction was reported in the BioNTech group, and the Sinopharm vaccinees presented the mildest reactogenicity profile, with 93.8% of the vaccinees declaring no adverse reactions. Moderna’s vaccine induced the highest amounts of SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG, IgA, and serum neutralization activity compared to the other groups. In contrast, people vaccinated with Sinopharm and Johnson and Johnson’s vaccines have the lowest SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody titers. Vaccinees from the Johnson and Johnson group presented significant levels of SARS-CoV-2 specific IgA but not IgG compared to the controls before vaccination. In the Sinopharm group, neither IgG nor IgA expression was significant. In addition, sera from vaccinees of these two groups presented no significant neutralization potential compared to the unvaccinated controls. Significant negative correlations between age and SARS-CoV-2- specific IgG expression were observed in the Johnson and Johnson (r=-0.4414, p=0.009) and Sinopharm (r=-0.6108, p=0.0006) groups. Remarkably, younger vaccinees (18-60 years old) in both Sinopharm and Johnson and Johnson groups produced substantial SARS-CoV-2 specific antibody expression and exhibited significant neutralization potential. While the AstraZeneca vaccine alone induced moderate IgG and IgA expression, the combination with Moderna or BioNTech mRNA vaccines induced higher antibody levels than a double dose of AstraZeneca and similar IgG expression and neutralization potential compared to Moderna, or BioNTech used alone. CONCLUSIONThe results suggest that the Moderna vaccine is the most immunogenic after two doses. AstraZeneca and Sputnik-V presented moderate but significant antibody expression and virus neutralizing properties. Low antibody and neutralization potential was observed in the elderly vaccinated with Sinopharm or Johnson and Johnson vaccines. The data also suggest that heterologous vaccination strategies combining the AstraZeneca DNA vectored vaccines and mRNA vaccines Moderna or BioNTech booster induced more robust antibody and virus neutralization potential compared to their homologous counterparts.

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. e31-e31
Author(s):  
Nasrin Ghiasi ◽  
Rohollah Valizadeh ◽  
Mohammad Arabsorkhi ◽  
Tahere Sadat Hoseyni ◽  
Korosh Esfandiari ◽  
...  

We believe that vaccination is just a way to eliminate or strongly stop the COVID-19. In this regard, there are several vaccines with different efficacy and side effects. It is urgently required to have some efficient vaccines for the prevention and control of SARS-CoV-2. In this review, international databases were considered for searching relevant articles from 1 January 2020 to 1 May 2021. Keywords were COVID-19, novel coronavirus, 2019- nCoV, coronavirus disease 2019, vaccine, Sputnik V, Gamaleya, Gam-COVID-Vac, Sinopharm, BBIBP-CorV, AstraZeneca, Vaxzevria, Oxford, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and AZD1222. Three Sputnik V, Sinopharm and AstraZeneca vaccines are useful to gain herd immunity. Enough intervals (at least three weeks/21 days) must be considered for sufficient neutralizing antibody titers. What is important is that the vaccination should be accelerated with each of the aforementioned three vaccines to achieve herd immunity in a shorter period of time because all three vaccines provide 100% prevention of severe COVID-19.


Viruses ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 2202
Author(s):  
Tuksin Jearanaiwitayakul ◽  
Suttikarn Apichirapokey ◽  
Runglawan Chawengkirttikul ◽  
Jitra Limthongkul ◽  
Mathurin Seesen ◽  
...  

The COVID-19 pandemic has currently created an unprecedented threat to human society and global health. A rapid mass vaccination to create herd immunity against SARS-CoV-2 is a crucial measure to ease the spread of this disease. Here, we investigated the immunogenicity of a SARS-CoV-2 subunit vaccine candidate, a SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein encapsulated in N,N,N-trimethyl chitosan particles or S-TMC NPs. Upon intraperitoneal immunization, S-TMC NP-immunized mice elicited a stronger systemic antibody response, with neutralizing capacity against SARS-CoV-2, than mice receiving the soluble form of S-glycoprotein. S-TMC NPs were able to stimulate the circulating IgG and IgA as found in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients. In addition, spike-specific T cell responses were drastically activated in S-TMC NP-immunized mice. Surprisingly, administration of S-TMC NPs via the intraperitoneal route also stimulated SARS-CoV-2-specific immune responses in the respiratory tract, which were demonstrated by the presence of high levels of SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG and IgA in the lung homogenates and bronchoalveolar lavages of the immunized mice. We found that peritoneal immunization with spike nanospheres stimulates both systemic and respiratory mucosal immunity.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikail Dogan ◽  
Lina Kozhaya ◽  
Lindsey Placek ◽  
Courtney Gunter ◽  
Mesut Yigit ◽  
...  

AbstractDevelopment of antibody protection during SARS-CoV-2 infection is a pressing question for public health and for vaccine development. We developed highly sensitive SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody and neutralization assays. SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein or Nucleocapsid protein specific IgG antibodies at titers more than 1:100,000 were detectable in all PCR+ subjects (n = 115) and were absent in the negative controls. Other isotype antibodies (IgA, IgG1-4) were also detected. SARS-CoV-2 neutralization was determined in COVID-19 and convalescent plasma at up to 10,000-fold dilution, using Spike protein pseudotyped lentiviruses, which were also blocked by neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). Hospitalized patients had up to 3000-fold higher antibody and neutralization titers compared to outpatients or convalescent plasma donors. Interestingly, some COVID-19 patients also possessed NAbs against SARS-CoV Spike protein pseudovirus. Together these results demonstrate the high specificity and sensitivity of our assays, which may impact understanding the quality or duration of the antibody response during COVID-19 and in determining the effectiveness of potential vaccines.


Vaccines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 742
Author(s):  
José Javier Morales-Núñez ◽  
José Francisco Muñoz-Valle ◽  
Carlos Meza-López ◽  
Lin-Fa Wang ◽  
Andrea Carolina Machado Sulbarán ◽  
...  

The main expected result of a vaccine against viruses is the ability to produce neutralizing antibodies. Currently, several vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 are being applied to prevent mortal complications, being Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) one of the first to be authorized in the USA and Mexico (11 December 2020). This study evaluated the efficacy of this vaccine on antibody production with neutralizing capacity and its side effects in healthcare workers with and without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection and in a group of unvaccinated individuals with prior COVID-19. The main findings are the production of 100% neutralizing antibodies in both groups after the second dose, well-tolerated adverse effects, the possible presence of immunosenescence, and finally, we support that a single dose of this vaccine in individuals with prior COVID-19 would be sufficient to achieve an immunization comparable to people without prior COVID-19 with a complete vaccination program (2 doses).


2021 ◽  
pp. 2046147X2110140
Author(s):  
Roumen Dimitrov

In this paper I analyse a series of Australian MMR (measles-mumpsrubella) vaccination campaigns and policies from the last decade. Using the Bruno Latour’s Actor Network Theory (ATN), I locate human and non-human mediators – including the virus and vaccine – in the complex pro-vaccination alliance led by government campaigners. I identify the vaccine hesitant parents – a large group that ‘sits on the fence’ between the ‘vaccine confident’ and ‘vaccine refusing’ parents – as the main target of pro-vaccination campaigns. PR literature on pro-vaccination campaigns has applied ATN to the independence of the media as network agents. This paper contributes with the problematisation of several more actors such as the health workers, medical experts and the vaccine hesitant parents themselves. Even when they are keen members of a pro-vaccination network, they cannot be taken for granted. This is where understanding of stigma, silence and voice helps. To align their group interests and discourses, government should know how to communicate strategically – including how to communicate indirectly, avoiding stigma and keeping certain internal affinities and communicative distances intact. In conclusion, I make suggestions about strategic communication in pro-vaccination campaigns. Communication of statistical risks and side effects should be central. It is a winning strategy because it establishes a more credible balance between individual rights and collective obligations in achieving herd immunity. And mandating vaccination cannot replace communication. Research shows that legislating compulsory vaccination may have short-term and relatively small effects. They are almost negligible in the long run. Mandate may trigger compliance, but it also causes anger and mistrust. Mandating vaccine has negative side effects. It punishes with economic and cultural sanctions the socially disadvantaged, who are not active refusers. It also has the opposite effect on vaccine hesitant parents. It does not weaken but rather strengthens their resistance to the vaccine and pushes them to the lager of antivaxxers.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Martinez ◽  
Alexandra Schaefer ◽  
Sophie Gobeil ◽  
Dapeng Li ◽  
Gabriela De la Cruz ◽  
...  

AbstractSARS-CoV in 2003, SARS-CoV-2 in 2019, and SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC) can cause deadly infections, underlining the importance of developing broadly effective countermeasures against Group 2B Sarbecoviruses, which could be key in the rapid prevention and mitigation of future zoonotic events. Here, we demonstrate the neutralization of SARS-CoV, bat CoVs WIV-1 and RsSHC014, and SARS-CoV-2 variants D614G, B.1.1.7, B.1.429, B1.351 by a receptor-binding domain (RBD)-specific antibody DH1047. Prophylactic and therapeutic treatment with DH1047 demonstrated protection against SARS-CoV, WIV-1, RsSHC014, and SARS-CoV-2 B1.351infection in mice. Binding and structural analysis showed high affinity binding of DH1047 to an epitope that is highly conserved among Sarbecoviruses. We conclude that DH1047 is a broadly neutralizing and protective antibody that can prevent infection and mitigate outbreaks caused by SARS-like strains and SARS-CoV-2 variants. Our results argue that the RBD conserved epitope bound by DH1047 is a rational target for pan Group 2B coronavirus vaccines.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huanle Luo ◽  
Tingting Jia ◽  
Jiamin Chen ◽  
Shike Zeng ◽  
Zengzhao Qiu ◽  
...  

Increasing evidence suggests that dysregulated immune responses are associated with the clinical outcome of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Nucleocapsid protein (NP)-, spike (S)-, receptor binding domain (RBD)- specific immunoglobulin (Ig) isotypes, IgG subclasses and neutralizing antibody (NAb) were analyzed in 123 serum from 63 hospitalized patients with severe, moderate, mild or asymptomatic COVID-19. Mild to modest correlations were found between disease severity and antigen specific IgG subclasses in serum, of which IgG1 and IgG3 were negatively associated with viral load in nasopharyngeal swab. Multiple cytokines were significantly related with antigen-specific Ig isotypes and IgG subclasses, and IL-1β was positively correlated with most antibodies. Furthermore, the old patients (≥ 60 years old) had higher levels of chemokines, increased NAb activities and SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG1, and IgG3 responses and compromised T cell responses compared to the young patients (≤ 18 years old), which are related with more severe cases. Higher IgG1 and IgG3 were found in COVID-19 patients with comorbidities while biological sex had no effect on IgG subclasses. Overall, we have identified diseases severity was related to higher antibodies, of which IgG subclasses had weakly negative correlation with viral load, and cytokines were significantly associated with antibody response. Further, advancing age and comorbidities had obvious effect on IgG1 and IgG3.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nasamon Wanlapakorn ◽  
Nungruthai Suntronwong ◽  
Harit Phowatthanasathian ◽  
Ritthideach Yorsang ◽  
Thanunrat Thongmee ◽  
...  

Abstract Limited data are available on the responses to heterologous vaccine regimens for SARS-CoV-2, especially among countries using inactivated and adenoviral-vectored vaccines. A total of 77 participants who received heterologous prime/booster-inactivated COVID-19 vaccine and adenoviral-vectored vaccine were enrolled in our study. There were two comparison groups vaccinated with the homologous CoronaVac (N = 79) and AZD1222 (N = 80) regimen. All sera samples were tested for SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding-domain (RBD) IgG using a chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA). The neutralizing activity in a subset of serum samples was tested against the original Wuhan strain and variants of concern, B.1.1.7 and B.1.351, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT). The CoronaVac followed by the AZD1222 vaccine induced higher levels of spike RBD-specific IgG than that of two-dose CoronaVac or AZD1222 vaccines (p < 0.001). Sera samples of the CoronaVac/AZD1222 vaccine recipients elicited higher neutralizing antibody activity against the original Wuhan and the B.1.351 strain than in the recipients of the two-dose CoronaVac or AZD1222. Following the inactivated CoronaVac/adenoviral-vectored (AZD1222) vaccination administered 14–72 days apart, participants receiving the heterologous vaccine regimen had higher spike RBD-specific IgG and neutralizing activities than the homologous CoronaVac vaccine recipients.


Author(s):  
Morihito Takita ◽  
Tomoko Matsumura ◽  
Kana Yamamoto ◽  
Erika Yamashita ◽  
Kazutaka Hosoda ◽  
...  

AbstractThe serosurvey is an alternative way to know the magnitude of the population infected by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) since the expansion of capacity of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was delayed. We herein report seroprevalence of COVID-19 accessed in the two community clinics in Tokyo. The point-of-care immunodiagnostic test was implemented to detect the SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG antibody in the peripheral capillary blood. The overall positive percentage of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody is 3.83% (95% confidence interval: 2.76-5.16) for the entire cohort (n =1,071). The central Tokyo of 23 special wards exhibited a significantly higher prevalence compared to the other area of Tokyo (p =0.02, 4.68% [95%CI: 3.08-6.79] versus 1.83 [0.68-3.95] in central and suburban Tokyo, respectively). The seroprevalence of the cohort surveyed in this study is low for herd immunity, which suggests the need for robust disease control and prevention. A community-based approach, rather than state or prefectural levels, is of importance to figure out profiles of the SARS-COV-2 outbreak.


1984 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 591-593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shin-ichi Otsuka ◽  
Hajime Handa ◽  
Junkoh Yamashita

✓ In a patient with glioblastoma treated with interferon (IFN-α) for a long period of time, a high titer of IFN-neutralizing antibody was detected in the serum during and after IFN therapy. Computerized tomography findings and neurological symptoms in this patient were unchanged during IFN therapy. General malaise, fever, anorexia, nausea, and decrease of leukocytes, platelets, erythrocytes, hemoglobin, and hematocrit were recognized transiently as side effects of IFN administration. These side effects were not serious and resolved spontaneously without discontinuation of therapy. The appearance of IFN-neutralizing antibody is clinically important because the antibody probably neutralizes the effect of systemically administered IFN before it reaches the site of action.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document