Humoral Immune Response in IBD Patients Three and Six Months after Vaccination with the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccines mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronovirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the cause of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Vaccination is considered the core approach to containing the pandemic. There is currently insufficient evidence on the efficacy of these vaccines in immunosuppressed inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the humoral response in immunosuppressed IBD patients after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. In this prospective study, IgG antibody levels (AB) against the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (spike-protein) were quantitatively determined. For assessing the potential neutralizing capacity, a SARS-CoV-2 surrogate neutralization test (sVNT) was employed in IBD patients (n = 95) and healthy controls (n = 38). Sera were examined prior to the first/second vaccination and 3/6 months after second vaccination. Patients showed lower sVNT (%) and IgG-S (AU/mL) AB both before the second vaccination (sVNT p < 0.001; AB p < 0.001) and 3 (sVNT p = 0.002; AB p = 0.001) and 6 months (sVNT p = 0.062; AB p = 0.061) after the second vaccination. Although seroconversion rates (sVNT, IgG-S) did not differ between the two groups 3 months after second vaccination, a significant difference was seen 6 months after second vaccination (sVNT p = 0.045). Before and three months after the second vaccination, patients treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents showed significantly lower AB than healthy subjects. In conclusion, an early booster shot vaccination should be discussed for IBD patients on anti-TNF therapy.

Temporary hold of mycophenolate boosts SARS-CoV-2 vaccination-specific humoral and cellular immunity in kidney transplant recipients

Transplant recipients exhibit an impaired protective immunity after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, potentially caused by mycophenolate (MPA) immunosuppression. Recent data from autoimmune patients suggest that temporary MPA hold might significantly improve booster vaccination outcomes. We applied a fourth dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine during temporary (5 weeks) MPA hold to 29 kidney transplant recipients, who had not mounted a humoral immune-response to previous vaccinations. Seroconversion until day 32 after vaccination was observed in 76% of patients, associated with acquisition of virus neutralizing capacity. Interestingly, 21/25 (84%) CNI-treated patients responded, but only 1/4 Belatacept-treated patients. In line with humoral responses, counts and relative frequencies of spike receptor binding domain (RBD) specific B cells were significantly increased on day 7 after vaccination, with an increase in RBD specific CD27++CD38+ plasmablasts. Whereas overall proportions of spike-reactive CD4+ T cells remained unaltered after the fourth dose, frequencies were positively correlated with specific IgG levels. Importantly, antigen-specific proliferating Ki67+ and in vivo activated PD1+ T cells significantly increased after re-vaccination during MPA hold, whereas cytokine production and memory differentiation remained unaffected. In summary, MPA hold was safe and augmented all arms of immunity during booster vaccination, suggesting its implementation in vaccination protocols for clinically stable transplant recipients.

Superior immunity that allows neutralization of all SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern develops in COVID-19 convalescents and naïve individuals after three vaccinations

Infection-neutralizing antibody responses after SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 vaccination are an essential part of antiviral immunity. This immune protection is challenged by the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VoCs) with immune escape properties, such as omicron (B.1.1.529) that is rapidly spreading worldwide. Here, we report neutralizing antibody dynamics in a longitudinal cohort of COVID-19 convalescent and naïve individuals vaccinated with mRNA BNT162b2 by quantifying anti-SARS-CoV-2-spike antibodies and determining their avidity and neutralization capacity. A superior infection-neutralizing capacity against all VoCs, including omicron, developed by either two vaccinations of convalescents, or a third vaccination or breakthrough infection of twice-vaccinated naïve individuals. These three consecutive spike antigen exposures resulted in an increasing neutralization capacity per anti-spike antibody unit and were paralleled by stepwise increases in antibody avidity. In conclusion, an infection/vaccination-induced hybrid immunity or a triple immunization induces high-quality antibodies resulting in superior neutralization capacity against VoCs, including omicron.

Quantitation of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies with a virus-free, authentic test

Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), and their concentration in sera of convalescents and vaccinees are a solid correlate of protection from COVID-19. The antibody concentrations in clinical samples that neutralize SARS-CoV-2 are difficult and very cumbersome to assess with conventional virus neutralization tests (cVNTs), which require work with the infectious virus and biosafety level 3 containment precautions. Alternative virus neutralization tests currently in use are mostly surrogate tests based on direct or competitive ELISA formats or use viral vectors with the spike protein as the single structural component of SARS-CoV-2. To overcome these obstacles, we developed a virus-free, safe and very fast (4.5 h) in vitro diagnostic test based on engineered yet authentic SARS-CoV-2 virus-like-particles (VLPs). They share all features of the original SARS-CoV-2 but lack the viral RNA genome and thus are non-infectious. NAbs induced by infection or vaccination, but also potentially neutralizing monoclonal antibodies can be reliably quantified and assessed with ease and within hours with our test, because they interfere and block the ACE2-mediated uptake of VLPs by recipient cells. Results from the VLP neutralization test (VLPNT) show excellent correlation to a cVNT with fully infectious SARS-CoV-2 and allow to estimate the reduced neutralization capacity of COVID-19 vaccinee sera with variants of concern of SARS-CoV-2.Author summaryThe current pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 is a major challenge not only for COVID-19 patients, medical staff, healthcare systems and the general public, but also virologists and clinical laboratories. A particular challenge are safety issues which require biological safety level 3 to work with and study the pathogen. An alternative are virus-like particles (VLPs) of SARS-CoV-2, which are authentic in terms of viral structure and function but are harmless bioproducts in nature. We engineered VLPs which are close-to-perfect mimics of SARS-CoV-2 by all structural, biochemical, physical and functional criteria tested. SARS-CoV-2 VLPs were used in virus neutralization tests (VNTs). Because high concentrations of neutralizing antibodies correlate with protection from COVID-19 practical VNTs are urgently needed. We developed an authentic, virus-free, thus safe yet very fast in vitro diagnostic test with SARS-CoV-2 VLPs. Virus neutralizing antibodies induced by natural infection or vaccination but also certain monoclonal antibodies inhibit VLP fusion with recipient cells carrying ACE2. Quantitative results from a conventional neutralization test with fully infectious SARS-CoV-2 and results from the VLP-based neutralization test correlate perfectly. The setup of the test is very flexible and allows to analyze sera for their neutralizing capacity against different variants of concern and in a standardized assay format.

Neutralization of ancestral SARS-CoV-2 and variants Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, Zeta and Omicron by mRNA vaccination and infection-derived immunity through homologous and heterologous variants

Emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern/interest (VOC/VOI) raise questions about effectiveness of neutralizing antibodies derived from infection or vaccination. As the population immunity to SARS-CoV-2 has become more complex due to prior infection and/or vaccination, understanding the antigenic relationship between variants is needed. Here, we have assessed in total 104 blood specimens from convalescent individuals after infection with early-pandemic SARS-CoV-2 (pre-VOC) or with Alpha, Beta, Gamma or Delta, post-vaccination after double-dose mRNA-vaccination and break through infections due to Delta or Omicron. Neutralization against seven authentic SARS-CoV-2 isolates (B.1, Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, Zeta, Omicron) was assessed by plaque-reduction neutralization assay. We found highest neutralization titers against the homologous (previously infecting) variant, with lower neutralization efficiency against heterologous variants. Significant loss of neutralization for Omicron was observed but to a varying degree depending on previously infecting variant (23.0-fold in Beta-convalescence up to 56.1-fold in Alpha-convalescence), suggesting that infection-derived immunity varies, but independent of the infecting variant is only poorly protective against Omicron. Of note, Zeta VOI showed also pronounced escape from neutralization of up to 28.2-fold in Alpha convalescent samples. Antigenic mapping reveals both Zeta and Omicron as separate antigenic clusters. Double dose vaccination showed robust neutralization for Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta and Zeta, with fold-change reduction of only 2.8 (for Alpha) up to 6.9 (for Beta). Escape from neutralization for Zeta was largely restored in vaccinated individuals, while Omicron still showed a loss of neutralization of 85.7-fold compared to pre-VOC SARS-CoV-2. Combined immunity from infection followed by vaccination or vaccine breakthrough infection showed highest titers and most robust neutralization for heterologous variants. Breakthrough infection with Delta showed only 12.5-fold reduced neutralization for Omicron, while breakthrough infection with Omicron showed only a 1.5-fold loss for Delta, suggests that infection with antigenically different variants can boost immunity for antigens closer to the vaccine strain. Antigenic cartography showed also a tendency towards broader neutralizing capacity for heterologous variants. We conclude that the complexity of background immunity needs to be taken into account when assessing new VOCs. Development towards separate serotypes such as Zeta was already observed before Omicron emergence, thus other factors than just immune escape must contribute to Omicrons rapid dominance. However, combined infection/vaccination immunity could ultimately lead to broad neutralizing capacity also against non-homologous variants.

Neutralizing antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2: a population based seroepidemiological analysis in Delhi, India

We conducted this study to estimate seroprevalence of neutralizing antibodies in the general population and to further correlate it with the IgG SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels. This present cross-sectional analysis was conducted as a sequel to a state level community-based seroepidemiological study in Delhi, India. A total of 2564 seropositive samples were selected from 25622 seropositive samples through simple random sampling. Neutralizing capacity was estimated by performing a surrogate virus neutralization test with the sVNT (GenScript) assay. Neutralizing antibody against the SARS-CoV-2 virus was operationally considered as detected when the signal inhibition was ≥30%. A total of 2233 (87.1%, 95% C.I. 85.7, 88.3) of the 2564 SARS-CoV-2 seropositive samples had detectable neutralizing antibodies. On bi-variate analysis but not on adjusted analysis, Covid-19 vaccination showed a statistically significant association with the presence of neutralizing antibodies (p<0.001). The signal/ cut off (S/CO) of SARS-CoV-2 IgG ranged from 1.00 to 22.8 (median 11.40). In samples with S/CO ≥4.00, the neutralizing antibodies ranged from 94.5 to 100%, while in samples with S/CO <4.00, it ranged from 52.0 to 79.2%. The neutralizing antibody seroprevalence strongly correlated with the S/CO range (r=0.62, p=0.002). In conclusion, in populations with high SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence, neutralizing antibodies are generated in nearly 9 of 10 seropositive individuals.

Comparison of IgA, IgG and neutralizing antibody responses following immunization with Moderna, BioNTech, AstraZeneca, Sputnik-V, Johnson and Johnson, and Sinopharm’s COVID-19 vaccines.

BACKGROUNDSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and the resulting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have afflicted millions of people in a worldwide pandemic. Several vaccines have been developed to prevent infection and illness. However, the safety and efficacy of most of the vaccines currently available are still being questioned by part of the public opinion. Even if vaccine-resistant individuals represent a minority in most countries, their hesitancy is sufficient to delay the highly desired ‘herd-immunity threshold.’ METHODSIn an ongoing multinational trial, we collected blood samples from 365 adults, 18 years of age or older, vaccinated with mRNA vaccines (Moderna, BioNTech), viral DNA-vectored vaccines (AstraZeneca, Sputnik-V, and Johnson and Johnson), or the attenuated virus vaccine from Sinopharm. Out of the 365 vaccinated individuals included in the study, 41 received two doses of Moderna Biotech's Spikevax, 92 received two doses of BioNTech’s Comirnaty, 52 were vaccinated with two doses of Oxford-AstraZeneca’s Vaxzevria, 34 received one dose of Johnson and Johnson’s Jansen, 35 two doses of Gamaleja’s Sputnik-V and 28 two doses of Sinopharm’s BBIBP-CorV. In addition, 40 received a prime dose of AstraZeneca followed by BioNTech as a booster, whereas 43 received Moderna’s vaccine as a booster after a prime dose of AstraZeneca. After collecting reactogenicity data, the expression of S-Protein binding IgG and IgA were analyzed before and after full vaccination in each group using an automated sandwich ELISA system. In addition, the neutralizing capacity of sera from individuals from all groups was investigated using an ACE-2-RBD neutralizing assay. RESULTSThe main side effects reported included short-term mild-to-moderate pain at the injection site, fatigue, and headache. More severe side effects were reported by vaccinees in the Moderna (10%), AstraZeneca (11%), Johnson and Johnson (5.9%), and Sputnik-V (7.2%) groups. No severe adverse reaction was reported in the BioNTech group, and the Sinopharm vaccinees presented the mildest reactogenicity profile, with 93.8% of the vaccinees declaring no adverse reactions. Moderna’s vaccine induced the highest amounts of SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG, IgA, and serum neutralization activity compared to the other groups. In contrast, people vaccinated with Sinopharm and Johnson and Johnson’s vaccines have the lowest SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody titers. Vaccinees from the Johnson and Johnson group presented significant levels of SARS-CoV-2 specific IgA but not IgG compared to the controls before vaccination. In the Sinopharm group, neither IgG nor IgA expression was significant. In addition, sera from vaccinees of these two groups presented no significant neutralization potential compared to the unvaccinated controls. Significant negative correlations between age and SARS-CoV-2- specific IgG expression were observed in the Johnson and Johnson (r=-0.4414, p=0.009) and Sinopharm (r=-0.6108, p=0.0006) groups. Remarkably, younger vaccinees (18-60 years old) in both Sinopharm and Johnson and Johnson groups produced substantial SARS-CoV-2 specific antibody expression and exhibited significant neutralization potential. While the AstraZeneca vaccine alone induced moderate IgG and IgA expression, the combination with Moderna or BioNTech mRNA vaccines induced higher antibody levels than a double dose of AstraZeneca and similar IgG expression and neutralization potential compared to Moderna, or BioNTech used alone. CONCLUSIONThe results suggest that the Moderna vaccine is the most immunogenic after two doses. AstraZeneca and Sputnik-V presented moderate but significant antibody expression and virus neutralizing properties. Low antibody and neutralization potential was observed in the elderly vaccinated with Sinopharm or Johnson and Johnson vaccines. The data also suggest that heterologous vaccination strategies combining the AstraZeneca DNA vectored vaccines and mRNA vaccines Moderna or BioNTech booster induced more robust antibody and virus neutralization potential compared to their homologous counterparts.

mRNA booster immunization elicits potent neutralizing serum activity against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant

The Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 is causing a rapid increase in infections across the globe. This new variant of concern carries an unusually high number of mutations in key epitopes of neutralizing antibodies on the viral spike glycoprotein, suggesting potential immune evasion. Here we assessed serum neutralizing capacity in longitudinal cohorts of vaccinated and convalescent individuals, as well as monoclonal antibody activity against Omicron using pseudovirus neutralization assays. We report a near-complete lack of neutralizing activity against Omicron in polyclonal sera from individuals vaccinated with two doses of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine and from convalescent individuals, as well as resistance to different monoclonal antibodies in clinical use. However, mRNA booster immunizations in vaccinated and convalescent individuals resulted in a significant increase of serum neutralizing activity against Omicron. The presented study demonstrates that booster immunizations may be critical to substantially improve the humoral immune response against the Omicron variant.Authors Henning Gruell, Kanika Vanshylla, Florian Kurth, Leif E. Sander, and Florian Klein contributed equally to this work.

Allosteric Determinants of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Binding with Nanobodies: Examining Mechanisms of Mutational Escape and Sensitivity of the Omicron Variant

Structural and biochemical studies have recently revealed a range of rationally engineered nanobodies with efficient neutralizing capacity against SARS-CoV-2 virus and resilience against mutational escape. In this study, we performed a comprehensive computational analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 spike trimer complexes with Nb6, VHH E and bi-paratopic VHH VE nanobodies. We combined atomistic dynamics and collective motions analysis with binding free energy scanning, perturbation-response scanning and network centrality analysis to examine mechanisms of nanobody-induced allosteric modulation and cooperativity in the SARS-CoV-2 spike trimer complexes with these nanobodies. By quantifying energetic and allosteric determinants of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binding with nanobodies, we also examined nanobody-induced modulation of escaping mutations and the effect of the Omicron variant on nanobody binding. The mutational scanning analysis supported the notion that E484A mutation can have a significant detrimental effect on nanobody binding and result in Omicron-induced escape from nanobody neutralization. Our findings showed that SARS-CoV-2 spike protein may exploit plasticity of specific allosteric hotspots to generate escape mutants that alter response to binding without compromising activity. The network analysis supported these findings showing that VHH VE nanobody binding can induce long-range couplings between the cryptic binding epitope and ACE2-binding site through a broader ensemble of communication paths that is less dependent on specific mediating centers and therefore may be less sensitive to mutational perturbations of functional residues. The results suggest that binding affinity and long-range communications of the SARS-CoV-2 complexes with nanobodies can be determined by structurally stable regulatory centers and conformationally adaptable hotspots that are allosterically coupled and collectively control resilience to mutational escape.

Study of the Dissolution of Stainless-Steel Slag Minerals in Different Acid Environments to Promote Their Use for the Treatment of Acidic Wastewaters

Several stainless-steel slags have been successfully employed in previous studies as substitutes for lime in the treatment of industrial acidic wastewaters. This study deepens the knowledge of such application, by analyzing the neutralizing capacity of different slags related to their mineral compositions. To do so, firstly the chemical and mineral compositions of all the slag samples are assessed. Then, 0.5 g, 1 g, 2 g of each slag and 0.25 g and 0.5 g of lime are used to neutralize 100 g of 0.1 M HCl or HNO3 solutions. After the has neutralization occurred, the solid residues are extracted and analyzed using XRD spectroscopy. Then, the solubility of the minerals is assessed and ranked, by comparing the XRD spectra of the residues with the obtained pH values. The results show that minerals such as dicalcium silicate and bredigite are highly soluble in the selected experimental conditions, while minerals such as merwinite and åkermanite, only partially. Moreover, Al-rich slags seem to perform poorly due to the formation of hydroxides, which generate extra protons. However, when the weight of slag is adequately adjusted, Al-rich slags can increase the pH values to higher levels compared to the other studied slags.