scholarly journals Functional Variability of Technological Platforms in Innovation Infrastructure

2019 ◽  
pp. 31-45
Author(s):  
Vladimir Alexeevich Eliseev ◽  
Iurii Ivanovich Degtiariov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
System Analysis ◽  
Technological Development ◽  
Management Practice ◽  
Innovative Development ◽  
Innovation Infrastructure ◽  
Role Of The State ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Technological Platforms ◽  
The Eu

The subject of the work is innovative development, the theme is the role and specificity of «platform» management in the infrastructure of innovative development, and the purpose is to display the multi-functional variability of the participation of technological platforms in the innovation and infrastructure management practice of the EU, Russia and EurAsEC. The methodology of the work consists in the application of elements of system analysis (accepted and expected state decisions) in the innovative sphere of scientific and technological development, concerning: comparative characteristics of approaches to the creation of platforms in the EU and the Russian Federation, comparative characteristics of platforms and clusters, the order of formation of the list of platforms, proposals for regulation and requirements for the form of content and illustrative examples of functional and consolidated variability of platforms in the innovation infrastructure of domestic platforms, orientation and implementation of EurAsEC platforms. The research is based on the general scientific method (problem statement, information-analytical generalizations, classification and analogies, analysis and synthesis, inductive-deductive approach). The results of the work are that on the basis of the organizational and managerial Genesis of the EU technological platforms, the mission of the platforms in the innovation infrastructure of the Russian Federation and EurAsEC is outlined. The field of application of the results is the formation, implementation and expected prospects of domestic technological platforms. Summary. The functional variability of domestic technological platforms, which are communication tools of innovative development, is characterized by participation in the implementation of National priorities of this development, development Strategies of the Russian Federation, National projects, National technological initiatives, State and Federal target programs, Programs of measures to support promising industries, in the planned creation of the first technological valley, in clusters and technological engineering, in the formation of Eurasian platforms. Based on consideration of the mission platforms in the innovation infra-structure, contribution of organizational management Genesis platforms of the EU and the functional variability of the implementation of domestic platforms, it can be considered that the Russian Federation defined the role of the state as regulator of the platforms (not the participant or the mediator controls). The practice of formation and implementation of platforms of the Russian Federation is not without infrastructural management problems: there is still insufficient interest of big business in the activities of platforms and, as a consequence, extra – budgetary underfunding of projects and programs; «vagueness» of responsibility for the development of technologies (in the conditions of formation of " top «with the initiative of» bottom»); non-obvious coordination of interaction between platform participants and inter-budgetary regional relations; dependence and strengthening of external risks of the Russian Federation on participation/import of foreign capital and technologies; uncertainty of control procedures; lack of criteria/indicators of expected efficiency. Not all platforms of the Russian Federation and EurAsEC are guaranteed to be effective, but the success of any of them will form a new market of innovative products with the expected prospect of long-term development.

scholarly journals Germany and the European Union After the Epoch of Chancellor Angela Merkel

2021 ◽  
Vol 65 (9) ◽  
pp. 43-55
Author(s):  
V. Vasil'ev
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Focal Point ◽  
Technological Development ◽  
World Order ◽  
Federal Republic Of Germany ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Angela Merkel ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Eu

The article is devoted to the analysis of the political legacy of German Chancellor Angela Merkel and in what way the new German government might possibly use it dealing with the transformation of the country and modernization of the European Union. The new political coalition with possible participation of the Green Party will preserve the continuity of the German foreign policy course for strengthening the European Union, deepening the transatlantic partnership, for active cooperation between Berlin and Paris, as well as for inclusion of Belarus, Moldova and Ukraine into the Euro-Atlantic area. The European sovereignty is the main focal point in Berlin. The Conference on the Future of Europe examines it, as well as other evolution issues. The updated legal framework of the EU, feasible strengthening of the European Parliament positions could help transform the European Union into a weighty actor in the polycentric world. Only powerful, relatively sovereign EU is able to secure the “European way of life”. Judgments about the disintegration of the European Union are far from reality. The EU margin of safety and resistance are quite impressive, primarily due to the economic potential of Germany. However, it is really difficult to predict how the European Union will get out of the crisis caused by Covid 19. American concessions to the Germans on the Nord Stream 2 project mean Biden’s serious attitude towards Merkel and Germany – the leader in the EU and one of the important NATO allies. The conditions for Russia’s return to the “European club”, for example, through the revival of M. Gorbachev’s new political thinking in Moscow, indicate rather an illusory desire. There is another, more pragmatic approach. The single European cultural and historical matrix of Greater Europe, communication between the leaders of the Russian Federation, Germany, France and the USA, the economic foundation of contacts, as well as mutual sympathies between Russians, Germans, Europeans give reason to hope for a turn for the better. The chances of a unification agenda remain. Perhaps, it will be used by future generations of politicians, experts of the Russian Federation and the Federal Republic of Germany without preconditions, on the basis of reasonable compromises. Acknowledgements. The article was prepared within the project “Post-Crisis World Order: Challenges and Technologies, Competition and Cooperation” supported by the grant from Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation program for research projects in priority areas of scientific and technological development (Agreement 075-15-2020-783).

Modern Practice of ʽManual Managementʽ in Russian Governmental and Municipal Authority

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 2251
Author(s):  
Valeriy SHLYCHKOV ◽  
Ilgam KIYAMOV ◽  
Sergey KULISH ◽  
Diana NESTULAEVA ◽  
Igor ALAFUZOV
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
System Analysis ◽  
Management Practice ◽  
Historical Analysis ◽  
Economic Life ◽  
Russian Society ◽  
Municipal Authority ◽  
Municipal Management ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Definition Of

Objectives: to define content and structure of ʽmanual managementʽ term; to analyze motives, legal framework, legitimacy, forms and methods of using ʽmanual proceduresʽ in the management processes in entities of governmental and municipal authority in the Russian Federation; to explore foreign experience in terms of ʽmanual managementʽ; to define ratios between ʽsystemʽ and ʽmanualʽ methods in Russian management practice and to evaluate the degree of their influence on social and economic life of modern Russian society. The methodological base of the research is comprised with methods and scientific cognition techniques widely used in research practice, namely: methods of deduction and induction, generalization, observation, forecasting, scientific abstraction techniques, system analysis, as well as classification and grouping instruments, elements of cross-industry and comparative historical analysis; expert estimations. Results of the research: authors have formulated own definition of ʽmanual managementʽ term; revealed reasons, conditions and motives for its applying by Russian bodies of governmental and municipal authority; described the most spread methods of its application and factors concerning increase of cases of refuse to use system procedures in modern practice of governmental and municipal management. Scientific novelty: considering the practice of Russian governmental and municipal management authors focus on the lately applied procedures of its exercising, such as creation of parallel management structures, transition to instruments of directive instructions, etc. On the basis of conducted analysis of activity performed by bodies of governmental and municipal authority in constituent of the Russian Federation authors have revealed ratio between ʽmanualʽ and ʽsystemʽ procedures used in management process, formulated definition of ʽmanual managementʽ term, disclosed conditions and motives for its application and also made a conclusion stating the main reasons for applying and extending ʽmanual managementʽ practice are the incompleteness and inconsistency of applicable Russian legislation, which on the one hand cannot reflect to the full extent the fundamental changes in social and economic spheres that took place in Russia within the recent decades, and on the other hand is far not always able to sufficiently regulate relationships between object and subject in the process of governmental and municipal management. Practical relevance: as a result of the research authors forecast the probable consequences of outlined tendency for extension of practice of ʽmanual managementʽ in bodies of governmental and municipal authority in both - in the medium and the longer term.

scholarly journals Innovative development of the EU: strategic priorities of technological leader

2018 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Economic System ◽  
System Analysis ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Technological Development ◽  
Transport Infrastructure ◽  
Scientific Development ◽  
Innovative Development ◽  
Technological Leadership ◽  
Leading Position ◽  
The Eu

The relevance of the study is due to the fact that оne of the countries of the European economic system is Germany, which occupies a leading position in many indicators and in the global technology market. The subject of research of the article is the innovative development of the EU. The goal is the strategic priorities of technological leader - Germany in innovative development of the EU. The objective is to research the сomparison of tasks of the national high-technological strategy of Germany and the strategy of the Innovation Union of the EU. A tool for achieving strategy a rational growth throughout the territory the EU was the creation of an Innovation Union that united the national innovation systems of all member states EU. The essence of building the Innovation Union is to maintenance research and scientific development throughout Europe to improve the scientific and technical base and increase the competitiveness of the EU in the priority scientific fields, simultaneously solving such socio-economic tasks as job creation, improvement education, involvement youth in science, creation of innovative products and services, improvement of the healthcare system, transport infrastructure, as well as increasing energy efficiency, saving natural resources and caring for learning the environment. Being closely linked to the global idea of building an Innovation Union in Europe, the national strategy of high-technological development in Germany is similar to the overall European strategy goals and objectives. At the same time, Germany is not only one of the members of the Innovation Union, but a leader in technological development in many sectors of the economy. General scientific methods are used, such as system analysis. The following results were obtained: the national German innovation strategy proposes measures in five key inter-sectoral areas: (1) improving the relationship between science and industry; (2) enhancing R & D and innovation work in private the sector of the economy, (3) to ensure the dissemination of new advanced technologies in the economy, (4) to internationalize scientific research, development and introduction of new technologies, and (5) to promote the development and further of talents. Conclusions: on the basis of the conducted research, it was concluded that аll these proposed strategies of high-technologic development in Germany are aimed at simplifying and reducing the path from idea to implementation innovation, which will continue to ensure the technological leadership of Germany in the EU economic system.

scholarly journals The State and the Prospects of the Development of Innovative Activity in the Russian Federation in the XXI Century

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 34-44
Author(s):  
A. A. Varushchenko ◽  
N. A. Vladimirov
Keyword(s):  
Information And Communication Technologies ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Technological Development ◽  
Essential Element ◽  
Innovative Activity ◽  
High Tech ◽  
Innovative Development ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
Main Challenge ◽  
The Russian Federation

In recent years, Russia has taken a serious step towards innovative development, to a large extent by providing systematic incentives for innovation and technological development of sectors of the economy. Today, innovation, research, development and their implementation are an important part of the political ambitions of most developed and developing countries. Global spending on innovation continues to grow, and the share of business in it is increasing. The relevance of this topic is also due to the acceleration of the processes of digital transformation of the Russian and international economy, which is why the need to create conditions for innovation, information and communication technologies is increasing. Based on this, it is important for the Government of the Russian Federation to form a national innovation system that promotes the innovative activity of domestic enterprises and increases the scientific orientation of research activities of organizations. Developed countries achieve competitive advantages through the introduction of innovative technologies, a highly qualified workforce with creative thinking, efficient use of financial resources, and strong R&D. Identifying new market opportunities is easy for highly innovative companies. Currently, not only the emergence of new high-tech industries, but also the development of traditional ones is based on information and scientific potential. The development of science is closely related to the growing flow of information, which is both the result and the basis for the development of science, the results of which are subsequently embodied in economic development. The purpose of the article is to identify the main trends in the development of innovative processes in the Russian Federation. The active creation and modernization of technologies, introduction of various technological projects is one of the driving forces of the innovation process. In recent years, there has been a strengthening of innovative development in various sectors of the Russian economy, and a significant role in this development is played by the systemic stimulation of innovation and technological development. Materials and methods. The methodological basis of the study consists of works on regional statistics, mathematical modeling, and econometrics. Graphic and tabular methods of visualization of research results, statistical methods of analysis of economic phenomena were used. To solve the tasks of the study, application packages SPSS, Statistica were used. Results. The creation of new, unique advanced production technologies is an essential element of the innovative development of the country’s economy. The development of industrial design is one of the main stimulating factors for the innovative development of Russia. The increase in the number of issued patents for inventions with a high degree of probability predetermines an increase in the number of manufacturing technologies, which is the basis for progress in the field of manufacturing design. However, the main challenge remains the issue of financing. Conclusion. The article contains an analysis of the dynamics of the main indicators characterizing the innovative activity of organizations and provides forecast estimates of the indicator based on trend models.

scholarly journals Legal and organizational means of innovative development of the agro-industrial complex in Russia

2021 ◽  
Vol 262 ◽  
pp. 03014
Author(s):  
Alexander Savoskin ◽  
Victoria Kalitskaya ◽  
Maria Vilacheva ◽  
Takhir Toguzaev ◽  
Aslan Zhemukhov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
The State ◽  
Integrated System ◽  
High Tech ◽  
Industrial Complex ◽  
Innovative Development ◽  
Technical Program ◽  
Agrarian Policy ◽  
Role Of The State ◽  
The Russian Federation

The performance of agriculture in Russia remains unsatisfactory, which requires the state to take active measures to support and develop it. In recent years, government policy has been focused on the formation of a high-tech agro-industrial complex, the introduction of digital means and ensuring food security. At the same time, the measures which are taken by the state do not form a single integrated system and do not ensure the achievement of the desired effect. The publication analyzes the current state of legislation in the field of agro-industrial complex support. Particular attention is paid to the Federal Scientific and Technical Program for the Development of Agriculture for 2017 - 2025. Based on the results of the research, conclusions about the need to adopt a comprehensive federal law and strengthen the role of the State Council of the Russian Federation in the development of a national agrarian policy are drawn, measures to improve legislation in the field of supporting the innovative development of agriculture are substantiated, and additional measures of state support for the agro-industrial complex in the Russian Federation are proposed.

Modern Practice of ʽManual Managementʽ in Russian Governmental and Municipal Authority

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 2241
Author(s):  
Valeriy SHLYCHKOV ◽  
Ilgam KIYAMOV ◽  
Sergey KULISH ◽  
Diana NESTULAEVA ◽  
Igor ALAFUZOV
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
System Analysis ◽  
Management Practice ◽  
Historical Analysis ◽  
Economic Life ◽  
Russian Society ◽  
Municipal Authority ◽  
Municipal Management ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Definition Of

Objectives: to define content and structure of ʽmanual managementʽ term; to analyze motives, legal framework, legitimacy, forms and methods of using ʽmanual proceduresʽ in the management processes in entities of governmental and municipal authority in the Russian Federation; to explore foreign experience in terms of ʽmanual managementʽ; to define ratios between ʽsystemʽ and ʽmanualʽ methods in Russian management practice and to evaluate the degree of their influence on social and economic life of modern Russian society. The methodological base of the research is comprised with methods and scientific cognition techniques widely used in research practice, namely: methods of deduction and induction, generalization, observation, forecasting, scientific abstraction techniques, system analysis, as well as classification and grouping instruments, elements of cross-industry and comparative historical analysis; expert estimations. Results of the research: authors have formulated own definition of ʽmanual managementʽ term; revealed reasons, conditions and motives for its applying by Russian bodies of governmental and municipal authority; described the most spread methods of its application and factors concerning increase of cases of refuse to use system procedures in modern practice of governmental and municipal management. Scientific novelty: considering the practice of Russian governmental and municipal management authors focus on the lately applied procedures of its exercising, such as creation of parallel management structures, transition to instruments of directive instructions, etc. On the basis of conducted analysis of activity performed by bodies of governmental and municipal authority in constituent of the Russian Federation authors have revealed ratio between ʽmanualʽ and ʽsystemʽ procedures used in management process, formulated definition of ʽmanual managementʽ term, disclosed conditions and motives for its application and also made a conclusion stating the main reasons for applying and extending ʽmanual managementʽ practice are the incompleteness and inconsistency of applicable Russian legislation, which on the one hand cannot reflect to the full extent the fundamental changes in social and economic spheres that took place in Russia within the recent decades, and on the other hand is far not always able to sufficiently regulate relationships between object and subject in the process of governmental and municipal management. Practical relevance: as a result of the research authors forecast the probable consequences of outlined tendency for extension of practice of ʽmanual managementʽ in bodies of governmental and municipal authority in both - in the medium and the longer term.

scholarly journals Indicators System Improvement to Assess the Innovative Activity of Economic Entities, Taking into Account the Compliance with the Strategic Goals of Socio-Economic Developmen

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 6-14
Author(s):  
T. V. Pogodina ◽  
N. M. Abdikeev ◽  
Yu. S. Bogachev
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Technological Development ◽  
Import Substitution ◽  
Innovation Process ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Innovation Activity ◽  
Industrial Complex ◽  
Innovative Development ◽  
Economic Entity ◽  
The Russian Federation

In the society today, as well as in public administration and economic entities of the Russian Federation there is an awareness of the need to activate the innovation process and assess its quality. In addition, global challenges require the implementation of foresight management mechanisms aimed at forecasting technological development in the conditions of Russian reality. However, the existing system of indicators that is used in Russian practice does not fully meet the needs of the state and society in assessing innovation. The article proposes a Balanced system of indicators for assessing innovation activity (SSPOID) of economic entities, which is designed to combine the past and the present with the prospects of development, the objective function of which is to maximize the increment of the market value of the economic entity, taking into account the mission and strategic priorities of each particular company. SSPOID includes indicators, which are divided into nine groups that characterize the socio-economic development of the economic entity, human capital, financial condition, competitiveness, technology, competitiveness in the labor market, investment, innovation and sources of innovative development. The analysis of the development of industrial production in the Russian Federation for the period of 2011–2016 allowed to determine the strengths and weaknesses in innovation. The strategies of innovative development of a number of production companies (ALROSA, PJSC «NC “Rosneft”, JSC “United shipbuilding company”, JSC “BALTIKA”) were analyzed. The main areas of their innovation activities are as follows: improving energy efficiency, focus on strategic technology, the digitalization of production, the implementation of environmental innovations, improving production security, import substitution. The necessity in the creation of the integrated industrial and production complex, which will be optimum from the point of view of satisfaction of consumers’ needs for production, is justified. In the framework of the integrated industrial complex, the rationale for its focus on creating and maximizing the increment of the network added value is proved.

World experience in using the program-targeted planning methods for high-tech industry development

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 1723-1735
Author(s):  
A.Yu. Pronin
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Technological Development ◽  
High Tech ◽  
Economic Activities ◽  
High Tech Industry ◽  
Industry Development ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
Planning Methods ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Development Objectives

Subject. The article investigates the program-targeted planning methodology, which is implemented in the Russian Federation and leading foreign countries, for high-tech industry development. Objectives. The aim is to identify the specifics of program-targeted planning for the development of high-tech industries, to shape programs and plans for innovative development in the Russian Federation and leading foreign countries. Methods. The study employs general scientific methods of systems analysis, including the statistical and logical analysis. Results. I reviewed methods of program-targeted planning, implemented by the world’s leading countries (the Russian Federation, United States of America, France, Great Britain, Netherlands, Norway, Japan, Canada), in the interests of the development of various high-tech sectors of the economy. The study established that the methodology of program-targeted management is an effective tool for resource allocation by various types of economic activities in accordance with national priorities. I developed proposals by priority areas for improving the methodology for program-targeted planning and management in the Russian Federation in modern economic conditions. Conclusions. The findings and presented proposals can be used to improve methods for program-targeted planning to develop high-tech sectors of the economy; to design various long-term programs and plans, reducing the risk of their implementation; to determine the ways and methods of sustainable socio-economic and innovative and technological development of the world's leading economies.

Analyzing the production and economic indicators of Russia's largest iron and steel works

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 1531-1550
Author(s):  
N.N. Yashalova ◽  
I.L. Ryabkov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
System Analysis ◽  
Foreign Market ◽  
Domestic Market ◽  
Economic Indicators ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Economic Activities ◽  
Iron And Steel ◽  
The Russian Federation

Subject. We investigate trends in the development of the largest steel companies in the Russian Federation. Objectives. The aim of the study is to conduct an industry-wide analysis of the production and economic activities of the largest domestic enterprises operating in the iron and steel industry. Methods. The study employs methods of comparative and system analysis, graphical and statistical methods for data processing. Results. We present the analysis of main production and economic indicators of the leading steel producers of the Russian Federation, i.e. NLMK, Severstal, MMK, and EVRAZ. The paper reveals their current status and key development trends. Conclusions. The largest Russian steel companies face serious challenges in both the domestic and foreign market. Competitive interactions in the domestic market as to the sale price of rolled metal and the share of presence are particularly sensitive. The threat of reduced supplies to export markets is also significant for Russian steel producers. It may entail insufficient utilization of capacities and potential loss of added value. The companies mainly export semi–finished goods and hot-rolled flat products, i.e. low-added value products. Products with high added value are usually delivered to the domestic market.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document