scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pekerja Anak di Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-105
Author(s):  
Made Dharma Laksana Swastika ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
Desak Gde Dwi Arini

Child labor regulations in Law 13/2003 for child labor in a company can be said in practice to be quite good and in accordance with their respective work agreements and there must be permission from the child's parents. This study aims to determine the legal protection for child labor in Indonesia and determine the factors causing underage children to do work. This research was designed using empirical legal methods. Sources of data obtained directly from the community called primary data (basic data) and obtained from library materials called secondary data. Data was collected using documentation and interview techniques. The results of this study indicate that the regulation of child labor in the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 13 of 2003 for child labor in a company is in good practice and in accordance with the work agreement of each and there must be permission from the child's parents. In overcoming obstacles and obstacles, the company tries as much as possible to realize the core of article 68 of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 13 of 2003 in terms of prohibiting the company from employing underage child labor by providing certain policies to be enforced after deliberation between the company and child labor first. Through this research, non-litigation settlement is expected as the first choice and authoritative (fair for both parties), namely Workers and Employers are given the freedom to choose an existing peace agent (conciliator/mediator), and facilitate the formation of an arbitration system that is free / independent, independent, and authoritative.

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (22) ◽  
pp. 66-73
Author(s):  
Mahfutt Mahfutt ◽  
Khairil Anwar ◽  
Billi Belladona Matindas

The position of the Military Court is a body that executes the judicial power in the circle of the Indonesian National Armed Forces to enforce the law and justice with due observance of the interest in the state defense and safety. The Military Court is authorized to try the crimes committed by someone who when committing such crime is a soldier of the Indonesian National Armed Forces, a member of a group or office or body or equal to a soldier pursuant to the Law and someone is not included in the said group as set forth in the Law Number 31 of 1997 on Military Court. Following the reform of 1988, the existence of the Military Court is developed by some activists and the public that observe the Military Court, insisting the Parliament of the Republic of Indonesia to revise Law Number 31 of 1997 on Military Court, with the focus point for a soldier of the Indonesian National Armed Forces who commits a general crime to be tried in the General Court with the reason that the Military Court practice is closed in nature, and another reason is the equalization of rights before the law. The method used in this research is the normative law research that is carried out to obtain the necessary data relating to the problem. The data used is secondary data consisting of primary law materials, secondary law materials, and tertiary law materials. In addition, primary data is also used as the support of the secondary data law materials. The data is analyzed by the qualitative juridical analysis method. The results of the research show that the Military Court is one of the mechanisms that are always tried to be maintained. The outcome from the research discovers that the role of the Martial Court in Indonesia remains effective, fair, and democratic to this date realistically marked by fair punishment within the jurisdiction offended, which corresponds to the need of TNI institution in the aspects of Culture, Benefit, Assurance, and Fairness. It is recommended that the RI Government continuously develop and improve the same by maintaining the role of the Martial Court in punishing criminal offenses committed by military members on the Martial Court system currently in force.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 392
Author(s):  
Samuel Samuel ◽  
Siti Nurbaiti

In principle, the resolution of consumer disputes can be pursued peacefully. through an alternative mediation dispute resolution. In Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and Regulation of the Minister of Trade of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6 / M-DAG / PER / 2017 concerning the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body does not impose limits on the authority of BPSK in handling and adjudicating a consumer dispute. However, in reality many times the decisions of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body (BPSK) are submitted to the district court and stated that BPSK is not authorized to handle such disputes. How is the authority of the Consumer Dispute Resolution Board in handling disputes between PT. Sinar Menara Deli and Sari Alamsyah are the issues discussed. The method used in this research is descriptive normative legal research, using secondary data and primary data as supporting data with the law approach. The results of the study illustrate that BPSK is not authorized to handle disputes between PT. Sinar Menara Deli with Sari Alamsyah, because the business actors in this dispute have submitted a refusal to be resolved through BPSK and not achieving the requirements for consumer disputes. It is recommended that BPSK members pay more attention to the provisions in the Consumer Protection Act and other regulations concerning the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Jibril ◽  
Arvel Mulia Pratama ◽  
Jinan Raidangi

Abstract: Land Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest in Indonesia still often causes polemic, as is still often found in various mass media. The problem in the implementation of land aquisition is because the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2012 concerning Land Aquisition for Development in the Public Interest, and the Presidential Regulation that follows it, has not rigidly stipulated the basis for determining the compensation value used to determine the compensation value. This research was conducted by making a comparison between ius constitutum and in concreto events in the field. Primary data in this study were obtained byinterviewing several sources in August 2017, which can be accounted for, while the secondary data were obtained byliterature studies. Based on the research, it is known that there is injustice in determining the value of compensation to the entitled parties. Seeing this, the author tried to describe the existing problems and provide solutions tailored to the situation and conditions in land aquisition in Indonesia. This was intended to actualize the value of social justice in the aquisition of land for development in the public interest in Indonesia.Intisari: Pengadaan Tanah bagi Pembangunan untuk Kepentingan Umum di Indonesia masih sering menimbulkan polemik, sebagaimana yang masih kerap ditemui dalam berbagai media massa. Permasalahan dalam pelaksanaan pengadaan tanah disebabkan karena Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 tentang Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum, serta Peraturan Presiden yang mengikutinya belum mengatur secara rigid tentang dasar penetapan nilai ganti kerugian yang digunakan untuk menetapkan nilai ganti kerugian. Kajian ini dilakukan dengan melakukan komparisi antara ius constitutum dengan peristiwa in concreto yang ada di lapangan. Data primer dalam kajian ini diperoleh dari hasil wawancara dari beberapa narasumber pada Agustus 2017 yang dapat dipertanggungjawabkan dan data sekunder dalam kajian ini diperoleh dari studi kepustakaan. Berdasarkan penelitian diketahui bahwa terdapat ketidakadilan dalam penetapan nilai ganti kerugian terhadap pihak-pihak yang berhak. Melihat hal tersebut penulis mencoba menguraikan permasalahan yang ada dan memberikan solusi yang disesuaikan dengan situasi dan kondisi dalam pengadaan tanah di Indonesia. Hal ini dimaksudkan untuk mengaktualisasikan nilai keadilan sosial dalam pengadaan tanah bagi pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum di Indonesia 


Jurnal Akta ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 167
Author(s):  
KERI SANTOSA ◽  
Lathifah Hanim

The purpose and this study is to know the Legal Protection for Good-Strong Parties in Cancellation of Sale and Purchase Agreement of Land and Banguan (Study of PN Decision No. 29 / Pdt.6 / 2014 / PN.wsb). This research is empirical law research, that is research based on implementation in effort to get primary data preceded by library research to obtain secondary data. The research was conducted at Notary Office / PPAT, and all data obtained were analyzed quantitatively. Based on the analysis, the authors conclude several things Legal protection against the good-willed (buyer) in the sale and purchase agreement of land and building if the seller cancel the agreement, then for the signature of partial signing by the parties is a must.Judge's Consideration on Legal Protection for Good-Predicted Parties In Cancellation JuaL Purchases Land and Buildings where the Public Prosecutor should be thorough and careful in preparing the indictment, since the indictment is the basis for the judge to impose or not to bring down the defendant faced beforehand the court, in addition, must also have knowledge or knowledge of the law well, not only the law in formal, but also the law materially so as not wrong in determining where the deeds in accordance with the elements that are indicted. As for constraints and solutions Legal Protection Both parties who are intent on canceling Land and Building Sell To know whether the buyer has good intentions or not, then there must be a way of measuring it, that is by finding out the activeness of the buyer, where the buyer is obliged to examine the material facts and the juridical facts of the object of the transaction. If the buyer has been actively researching related to the material facts of the object of the transaction, then he can be considered as a good-faith buyer who gets legal protection, To know whether the buyer is well or not, then there must be a way of measuring it, that is by finding out the liveliness of the buyer where the buyer is obliged to examine the material facts and juridical facts of the object of the transaction. If the buyer has actively examined the material facts related to the object of the transaction, then he may be considered a good-faith buyer who has legal protection Keywords: Legal Protection, Cancellation of Sale and Purchase of Land and Building


Author(s):  
Juleni Juleni ◽  
Albertus Sentot Sudarwanto

The current study aimed at discovering the notary' challenge during their attempt at obtaining legal protection when facing an allegation of committing criminal activity. In carrying out their duty as a public officer who is authorized to make authentic deed and other authorities under the law, Notary needs to obtain legal protection for the sake of legal certainty and legal service function. The current study could be classified as an empirical legal study. This study employed primary and secondary data collected from interviews and document analysis.  The collected data were analyzed by using an interactive model of qualitative analysis technique. Based on article 66 paragraph (1) of Law of The Republic of Indonesia No. 2 of 2014 about the changes to the law number 30 of 2004 regarding position of notary, it has been regulated that for judicial process, investigators, public prosecutors, or judges shall obtain the consent from The Notary Honorary Council to perform an investigation towards a Notary. Notary Honorary Council is an institution that borns to provide legal protection towards a Notary. Especially Regional Notary Honorary Council who is authorized in this case, by its panel of Inspector. However, in fact, there are several factors which make notaries had not felt optimal legal protection from the Regional Notary Honorary Council.


Jurnal Akta ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 771
Author(s):  
Najmi Amudy ◽  
Gunarto Gunarto ◽  
Achmad Sulchan

The purpose of this study was to: 1) To identify and analyze the implementation of the principle of presumption valid for notaries who make Partij deed according to Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning amendments to the law No. 30 of 2004 concerning Notary. 2) To identify and analyze problems and solutions for the implementation of a legitimate presumption that a deed Partij Notary according to Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning amendments to the law No. 30 of 2004 concerning Notary. The data used in this study are primary data, secondary data and data that can support tertiary study, which was then analyzed by normative.Based on the results of data analysis concluded that: 1) an assessment of the Deed as the product of a public official, it must be done with the presumption of unauthorized or Vermoeden van rechtmatigheid or Presumptio lustae Causa, the Deed must be considered valid until there are those who claim deed is invalid then in the contested through the courts and there is a court decision that has permanent legal force 2) in the implementation of the principle of presumption valid for notaries who make Partij deed still major obstacles in the face by the Notary Public. Such constraints due to actions undertaken by the giving false information to the Notary in the process is an authentic deed, causing loss to the parties who feel aggrieved. The solution of the presumption of lawful implementation for notaries who make Partij deed is the absence of legal protection and legal justice for notaries who here become victims of false information given by to the Notary. In the event of the above, none of the violations committed by the Notary. Because of the early events at the root of the problem are the bad faith of the Notary. So that the implementation of their legitimate presumption that a deed Partij Notary shall apply. Because of the early events at the root of the problem are the bad faith of the Notary. So that the implementation of their legitimate presumption that a deed Partij Notary shall apply. Because of the early events at the root of the problem are the bad faith of the Applicant. So that the implementation of their legitimate presumption that a deed Partij Notary shall apply.Keywords: Principle of Legal Presumption, Notary, Partij deed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatma Ulfatun Najicha ◽  
I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani

<p>Abstract<br />The purpose of this study was to determine the legal politics in the formation of forestry legislation in licensing mining activities in forest areas in terms of environmental management strategy that is based on justice. This research is juridical doctrinal nature descriptive, with a qualitative approach. The method used by Approach legislation (statute approach) and the conceptual approach (conceptual approach). The collection of primary data and secondary data relating to the regulation of forest management in order to policy in forestry management as a whole can be categorized as forest politics. Political laws of occupation and use of natural resources has been regulated in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945, but the regulation on the management of natural resources, particularly forests that produce injustice. Even away from the sense of justice as referred to in the preamble Homeland 1945. One of the causes of injustice and abuse is the number of mining permits opening of forest destruction in violation of the principle of sustainability. Second, the law should be synergy policy in the licensing of mining activities in forest areas, the Act No. 41 1999 is still there (overlapping) overlapping the utilization of forest between mining and forestry activities are still unresolved and still occur in some areas. Similarly, Law No. 4 Year 2009 on Mineral and Coal are not yet fully support bersinergis natural keletarian remain legalize many dredging coal mines, then the Law 32 of 2009 requires the use of natural resources that is in harmony, and balanced with environmental functions. There is a duality of government policy, in which one side seeks to protect protected areas and establish rules to preserve it, but on the other hand opened up opportunities for the protected forest area exploited. Policy or program development must be animated by the obligation to make environmental preservation and realize the goal of sustainable development. Third Act Issuer within the framework of law should not stand alone because it is still in the realm of environmental law which means it is very closely related to the Forestry Law and the Environment. Hence the need for a policy formulation based Green Legislation overarching governance for sustainable forest and justice in a single Regulation.</p><p>Keywords: Politics, Law, Management of Forests, Mines, preservation, Justice.</p><p>Abstrak<br />Tujuan Penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui politik hukum dalam pembentukan perundang-undangan kehutanan  dalam  pemberian  izin  kegiatan  pertambangan  di  kawasan  hutan  ditinjau  dari  strategi pengelolaan lingkungan hidup yang berkeadilan.Penelitian  ini merupakan penelitian yuridis doktrinal yang  bersifat  diskriptif,  dengan  pendekatan  kualitatif.  Metode  yang  dipakai  melalui  Pendekatan peraturanperundang-undangan(statuteapproach)  danpendekatankonseptual(conceptualapproach). Pengumpulan data primer dan data sekunder yang berkaitan dengan peraturan pengelolaan kawasan hutan agar tetap lestari. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa pertama, Politik dimaknai sebagai suatu kebijakan maka, kebijakan pemerintah dalam pengelolaan kehutanan secara utuh dapat dikategorikan sebagai  politik kehutanan.  Politikhukum  penguasaan  danpemanfaatansumberdayaalam  telah  diatur dalam  Undang-Undang  Dasar  Negara Kesatuan  RepublikIndonesiaTahun1945,  namun pengaturan tentang  pengelolaan  sumber  daya  alam,  khususnya  hutan  yang  menghasilkan  ketidakadilan. Bahkanjauhdarirasakeadilanmasyarakatseperti  yangdimaksuddalamPembukaan  UUD  NKRI1945. Salah satu penyebab ketidakadilan serta penyalahgunaan adalah dengan banyaknya pembukaan ijin tambang perusakan hutan dengan melanggar prinsip kelestarian. Kedua, Perlu sinergisitas Kebijakan hukum dalam pemberian ijin kegiatan pertambangan di kawasan hutan, pada UU No. 41 Tahun 1999 sampai saat ini masih terdapat (overlapping) tumpang tindih lahan pemanfaatan hutan antara kegiatan pertambangan dan kegiatan kehutanan masih belum dapat diselesaikan dan tetap terjadi di beberapa daerah. Sama halnya dengan UUNo.4 Tahun2009tentangMineraldanBatu Bara yang belum bersinergis penuh mendukung keletarian alam tetap melegalisasikan banyaknya pengerukan tambang batubara, Kemudian padaUU No. 32 Tahun 2009 menuntut penggunaan sumber daya alam yang selaras, serasi, dan seimbang dengan fungsi lingkungan hidup. Terdapat dualisme kebijakanpemerintah, dimanadisatu <br />sisi  berupaya  untuk melindungikawasanlindung  danmenetapkanaturan-aturanuntukmelestarikannya, tapidisisilainmembuka peluangkawasan hutan lindung tersebutuntuk dieksploitasi. Kebijakanatau program pembangunan harus dijiwai oleh kewajiban melakukan pelestarian lingkungan hidup dan mewujudkan tujuan pembangunan berkelanjutan. Ketiga Undang-undang diatasdalam kerangka ilmu hukum harus tidak berdiri sendiri sebab masih masuk dalam ranah hukum lingkungan yang berarti sangat erat berhubungan dengan UU Kehutanan maupun Lingkungan. Oleh karena itu perlu adanya suatu formulasi kebijakan berbasis Green Legislation yang memayungi tata kelola kawasan hutan yang lestari dan berkeadilan dalam satu kesatuan Peraturan.</p><p>Kata Kunci : Politik Hukum, Pengelolaan Hutan, Tambang, Lestari, Keadilan</p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 493
Author(s):  
Bachrul Amiq ◽  
Yovan Iristian

<em>Law is a set of regulations that contain a kind of unity that we understand through a system, as one form of this realization through Article 22A of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The legal force binds a regulation in accordance with the hierarchy as referred to in Article 7 of the Law Number 15 of 2019 on the Establishment of Laws and Regulations (hereinafter Law Number 15 of 2019), but in line with Law Number 15 of 2019, it does not recognize the legal standing of the Ministerial Regulation. This research focuses on analyzing and finding answers to questions about the legal standing and characteristics of Ministerial Regulations in the Hierarchy of Statutory Regulations in Indonesia. The research method with a normative juridical approach, prioritizes library research and its implementation in practice. Research specifications are descriptive. The research phase is carried out through library research, collecting secondary data in the form of primary, secondary, and field research materials to obtain primary data as a support. The theory put forward by Hans Kelsen through Stufen Theory and Adolf Merkl’s theory through (Das Doppelte Rechtsantlitz) as a basic analysis to study the legal standing and characteristics of the Ministerial Regulation. In line with the Law 9 of 2015 on the Local Government that Ministerial Regulations are above Provincial, Regency / City Regional Regulations, thus Ministerial Regulations may not conflict with Presidential Regulations and Government Regulations and provide guidelines for Provincial, District / City Regulations in determining the local regulations</em>


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 306-312
Author(s):  
I Kadek Heri Diana S ◽  
Nella Hasibuan OLeary ◽  
Ida Ayu Puru Widiati

Nusa Penida is very well known for its rangrang woven cloth, but until now the filing of the cloth brand to the Directorate General of Intellectual Property has not been realized as a form of legal protection. The purpose of this research is to reveal the effectiveness of law number 20 of 2016 concerning the brand on rangrang woven fabrics in the Village of Nusa Penida and the efforts to protect the law against the woven cloth rangrang in the Village of Nusa Penida. The research method used is empirical. Primary data and secondary data were obtained by conducting observations and interviews as well as literature. Based on the results of research obtained by Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning brands, it cannot be said to be effective because the community does not register the woven woven cloth at the Directorate General of Intellectual Property, this is due to the lack of citizen knowledge of the law. So that government efforts are needed to provide socialization related to the importance of registering rangrang woven fabrics. And efforts to protect rangrang woven fabrics are still in the registration process and there will be socialization and services as well as assistance from the government for the smooth registration of rangrang woven fabrics at the Directorate General of Intellectual Property.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henny Susilowati ◽  
Wiwit Ariyani

Children as members of the next generation need to be protected. In the juvenile justice system, children are entitled to legal protection, both in the context of their position as children in conflict with the law (i.e. as criminals) and as victims or witnesses of crime. The laws of the Juvenile Criminal Justice System have been arranged to require the judge to consider the Social Research Report (SRR) given by community advisors before the verdict. The purpose of the study is to explain the benefits of Social Research Reports for children in conflict with the law and the constraints faced in preparing them. The experiment was conducted using an empirical juridical approach by promoting the use of primary data and was supported by secondary data. Based on the results of data analysis, it can be concluded that SRR preparation is very beneficial for children in conflict with the law. It contains conditions that explain the relationship between the condition of the offender and the committed criminal act so that it can be the basis of consideration for law enforcement officers in making the best decision for the children. Keywords: Social Research Report (SRR), Community Advisors (CA), children in conflict with the law


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document