scholarly journals Trends in Socioeconomic Inequalities in Hypertension in Ontario, Canada, 2000-2012

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Simran Shokar ◽  
Laura Rosella ◽  
Peter Smith ◽  
Hong Chen ◽  
Heather ChenManson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Household Income ◽  
Socioeconomic Inequalities ◽  
Material Deprivation ◽  
Discharge Abstract Database ◽  
Ontario Health Insurance Plan ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Study Objective ◽  
Relative Index ◽  
Index Of Inequality

IntroductionHypertension is leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality. Low socioeconomic position (e.g., income or high material deprivation) is an important risk factor for hypertension. However, there is limited evidence monitoring the extent to which socioeconomic inequalities in hypertension exist and are changing over time in Ontario. Objectives and ApproachThe study objective was to estimate socioeconomic trends in prevalent hypertension by household income and material deprivation in Ontario from 2000 to 2012. A pooled cross-sectional study was conducted using data from 6 Canadian Community Health Surveys linked to the Discharge Abstract Database and Ontario Health Insurance Plan data (n=121,390 over 35 years, 54\% female). Relative-weighted Poisson regression models were used to estimate hypertension rates (adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity and immigration) across quintiles of equivalized household income and area-level material deprivation. Socioeconomic inequalities were estimated using the slope index of inequality (SII) and relative index of inequality (RII). ResultsSocioeconomic inequalities in hypertension were observed across income quintiles on both absolute (SII: 1428 per 10,000, 95\%CI:1126,1730) and relative (RII:1.74, 95\%CI:1.53,1.94) scales in 2000, decreasing by 2012 (SII:297 per 10,000, 95%CI: -82,676; RII:1.19, 95%CI:0.93,1.45). A similar pattern was observed across material deprivation quintiles, however with smaller inequalities in 2000 (SII:595 per 10,000, 95%CI:306,884; RII:1.25, 95%CI:1.11,1.39) and 2012 (SII:389 per 10,000, 95%CI:17,761; RII:1.24, 95%CI:0.99,1.49). Conclusion/ImplicationsSocioeconomic inequalities in hypertension were observed in Ontario, with decreasing trends between 2000 and 2012. Area-level material deprivation underestimated individual-level socioeconomic inequalities in hypertension.

scholarly journals Trends in Socioeconomic Inequalities in Ischemic Heart Disease, 2000-2012

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan Smith ◽  
Chantel Ramraj ◽  
Peter Smith ◽  
Hong Chen ◽  
Jack Tu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Disease ◽  
Ischemic Heart Disease ◽  
Household Income ◽  
Socioeconomic Inequalities ◽  
Material Deprivation ◽  
Ischemic Heart ◽  
Study Objective ◽  
Individual Level ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Index Of Inequality

IntroductionLow socioeconomic position (SEP) is an important risk factor for ischemic heart disease (IHD). Current surveillance methods use area-based SEP measures to monitor trends in socioeconomic inequalities in IHD. The extent to which these methods underestimate individual-level socioeconomic inequalities in IHD is unclear. Objectives and ApproachThe study objective was to estimate socioeconomic trends in IHD by household income and material deprivation in Ontario from 2000 to 2012. A pooled cross-sectional study was conducted using data from 6 Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) cycles (2000-2012) linked to the Discharge Abstract Database (n= 119,529 over 35 years of age, 55% female). Relative-weighted Poisson regression models were used to estimate IHD prevalence rates (adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity and immigration) across quintiles of equivalized household income and area-level material deprivation. Socioeconomic inequalities were estimated using the slope index of inequality (SII) and relative index of inequality (RII). ResultsSocioeconomic inequalities in IHD were observed across income and material deprivation quintiles. Measured using the SII, adjusted IHD rates were 345 per 10,000 (95%CI: 207,483) higher at the bottom of the income distribution than the top in 2000, decreasing to 167 per 10,000 (95%CI: 40,293) by 2012. These differences represented 2.52 (95%CI: 1.58,3.46) times higher IHD rates in 2000, an increased risk that remained in 2012 (RII: 1.80, 95%CI: 0.97,2.63). A similar pattern was observed across material deprivation quintiles, however with smaller absolute and relative inequalities observed in 2000 (SII:195 per 10,000, 95%CI:79,312; RII:1.64, 95%CI:1.16,2.11) and 2012 (SII:142 per 10,000, 95%CI:16,268; RII:1.54, 95%CI:0.94,2.14). Conclusion/ImplicationsConsistent socioeconomic inequalities in IHD were observed in Ontario, with an absolute reduction between 2000 and 2012. Area-level material deprivation underestimated individual-level socioeconomic inequalities in IHD.

scholarly journals Regional and socioeconomic disparities in cardiovascular disease in Canada during 2005–2016: evidence from repeated nationwide cross-sectional surveys

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. e006809
Author(s):  
Haijiang Dai ◽  
Biao Tang ◽  
Arwa Younis ◽  
Jude Dzevela Kong ◽  
Wen Zhong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Household Income ◽  
Temporal Trends ◽  
Socioeconomic Inequalities ◽  
Significant Decline ◽  
Socioeconomic Disparities ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Relative Index ◽  
Index Of Inequality

IntroductionThe objective of this study is to examine the temporal trends and patterns of regional and socioeconomic disparities in cardiovascular disease (CVD) in Canada during 2005–2016.MethodsA total of 670 000 adults aged ≥20 years who participated in the Canadian Community Health Surveys between 2005 and 2016 were enrolled for this study. CVD referred to heart disease and stroke in this study. Equivalised household income was used as a proxy of socioeconomic status. Absolute and relative socioeconomic inequalities were measured by slope index of inequality (SII) and relative index of inequality (RII), respectively.ResultsIn 2015/2016, the overall age-adjusted and sex-adjusted prevalence of heart disease and stroke was 4.80% (95% CI 4.61% to 4.98%) and 1.25% (95% CI 1.13% to 1.36%), respectively. Trend analyses suggested a significant decline in the age-adjusted and sex-adjusted prevalence of heart disease (P for trend <0.001) and a non-significant decline in the age-adjusted and sex-adjusted prevalence of stroke (P for trend=0.058) from 2005 to 2016. Nevertheless, the total number of adults suffering from heart disease and stroke increased by 8.9% and 20.2% over the study period, respectively. Moreover, the age-adjusted and sex-adjusted prevalence of heart disease and stroke varied widely across all health regions, and both of them tended be higher among those with lower income. The SII and RII indicated that there were persistent absolute and relative socioeconomic inequalities in heart disease and stroke across all surveys (eg, SII for heart disease in both sexes, 2005: 0.04 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.04); 2015/2016: 0.03 (95% CI, 0.02 to 0.04); RII for heart disease in both sexes, 2005: 1.99 (95% CI 1.75 to 2.27); 2015/2016: 1.77 (95% CI 1.52 to 2.08).ConclusionGeographical and socioeconomic disparities should be taken into account during the further efforts to strengthen preventive measures and optimise healthcare resources for heart disease and stroke in Canada.

scholarly journals Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in the prevalence of functional dentition among older people in Brazil

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabiola Bof de Andrade ◽  
Jose Leopoldo Ferreira Antunes
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Socioeconomic Inequalities ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Relative Index ◽  
Functional Dentition ◽  
Natural Teeth ◽  
Index Of Inequality ◽  
Position Measure

The objective of this research was to evaluate trends in socioeconomic inequalities in the prevalence of functional dentition among community-dwelling older adults in Brazil. This was a cross-sectional study with data from the last two SBBrasil Project surveys conducted in 2003 and 2010. Functional dentition was defined as the presence of 20 or more natural teeth and was assessed during the clinical examination of dentition status. Schooling was used as the socioeconomic position measure. Socioeconomic inequality was measured using two complex measures; the slope index of inequality (SII) and the relative index of inequality (RII). The prevalence of functional dentition was 10.8% (95%CI: 8.1-14.2) in 2003 and 13.6% (95%CI: 11.1-16.5) in 2010. The prevalence of functional dentition increased significantly over the educational rank in both years. Absolute inequalities were significant for both years and remained unaltered between 2003 and 2010. Significant relative inequality in the prevalence of functional dentition was found in both years of the survey. Socioeconomic inequalities in the prevalence of functional dentition among older adults in Brazil persisted significantly between both national oral health surveys.

scholarly journals Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in smoking in Turkey from 2008 to 2016

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hur Hassoy ◽  
Isil Ergin ◽  
Gorkem Yararbas
Keyword(s):  
Older Women ◽  
Epidemic Model ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Socioeconomic Inequalities ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Relative Index ◽  
Younger Women ◽  
Index Of Inequality ◽  
Wealth Inequalities

Abstract Background Smoking inequalities in Turkey were previously demonstrated in an early stage of the smoking epidemic model. This paper aimed to assess the trends for socioeconomic inequalities in smoking in Turkey over the years in the context of the smoking epidemic model using data from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) Turkey 2008–2012-2016. Methods Cross-sectional data were analyzed to calculate the association of smoking with, wealth, education, occupation and place of residence using age-standardized prevalence rates, odds ratios, relative index of inequality (RII) and slope index of inequality (SII). The analysis was performed separately for age groups (younger: 20–39 years/older: 40 and above years) and sex. Results Younger women with higher wealth and older women with higher wealth and education smoked more. For both age groups, smoking was increased for working class and urban women. Relative wealth inequalities in smoking narrowed and then showed a reversal for younger women (RII2008 = 3.37; 95% CI:1.64–3.40; RII2012 = 2.19; 95% CI:1.48–3.24; RII2016 = 0.80; 95% CI:0.58–1.10, p-for trend < 0.0001). Relative educational inequalities in smoking for older women also showed a narrowing (RII2008 = 21.45; 95% CI:11.74–39.19; RII2012 = 15.25; 95% CI:9.10–25.55; and RII2016 = 5.48; 95% CI:3.86–7.78, p-for trend < 0.0001). For older women, a similar narrowing was observed for wealth (RII2008 = 3.94; 95% CI:2.38–6.53; RII2012 = 2.79; 95% CI:1.80–4.32; and RII2016 = 1.34; 95% CI:0.94–1.91, p-for trend = 0.0001). The only significant trend for absolute inequalities was for younger women by wealth. This trend showed a narrowing and then a reversal (SII2008 = 0.14; 95% CI:0.09–1.20; SII2012 = 0.12; 95% CI:0.06–0.18; and SII2016 = -0.05; 95% CI:-0.12–0.02, p-for trend = 0.0001). Unlike women, smoking in men showed inverse associations for wealth and education, although not statistically confirmed for all years. Smoking was increased in working classes and unemployed men in 2012 and 2016. Inequalities did not show a trend in relative and absolute terms for men. Conclusions For smoking inequalities in Turkey, a transition to the next stage was observed, although the previously defined Southern European pattern also existed. Low socioeconomic women deserve special attention as well as stressors at work and drivers of smoking at urban settings.

scholarly journals Socioeconomic inequalities in access barriers to seeking health services in four Latin American countries

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia Houghton ◽  
Ernesto Bascolo ◽  
Amalia del Riego
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Services ◽  
El Salvador ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Health Problem ◽  
Socioeconomic Inequalities ◽  
Access Barriers ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Relative Index ◽  
Index Of Inequality

Objective. To present summary measures of socioeconomic inequalities in access barriers to health services in Colombia, El Salvador, Paraguay, and Peru. Methods. This cross-sectional study used data from nationally - representative household surveys in Colombia, El Salvador, Peru, and Paraguay to analyze income-related inequalities in barriers to seeking health services. Households that reported having a health problem (disease/accident) and not seeking professional health care were considered to be facing access barriers. The measures of inequality were the slope index of inequality and relative index of inequality. Results. Inequality trends were mixed across the four countries. All showed improvement, but large inequality gaps persisted between the highest and lowest income quintiles, despite health care reforms. Relative inequality gaps were highest in Colombia (60%), followed by Paraguay (30%), Peru (20%), and El Salvador (20%). Conclusions. The effect of national policy initiatives on equity to accessing health services should be the object of future analysis. There is also a need for research on national and regional monitoring of access barriers and explanatory factors for why people do not seek care, even when having a health problem.

scholarly journals Time trends of socioeconomic inequalities in adolescent smoking in Okinawa, Japan, 2008–2016: a repeated cross-sectional study

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Minoru Takakura ◽  
Masaya Miyagi ◽  
Akira Kyan
Keyword(s):  
Time Trends ◽  
Parental Education ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Socioeconomic Inequalities ◽  
School Type ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Japanese Adolescents ◽  
Index Of Inequality ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Background Smoking among Japanese adolescents has decreased noticeably. However, little is known whether the decreasing trend in adolescent smoking can be seen across all socioeconomic status (SES) groups. This study aimed to examine trends in socioeconomic inequalities in smoking among Japanese adolescents between 2008 and 2016. Methods We conducted a repeated cross-sectional study using data from three surveys of high school students in Okinawa, Japan, in 2008, 2012, and 2016. The study participants consisted of 7902 students in grades 10 through 12 (15–18 years). Smoking was assessed as current cigarette use. SES indicators included familial SES (parental education and family structure) and student’s own SES (school type). To evaluate absolute and relative inequalities, prevalence differences (PDs) and ratios (PRs) between low and high SES groups were estimated. The slope index of inequality (SII) and relative index of inequality (RII) were also calculated. Results Smoking prevalence among boys and girls significantly declined from 11.5% and 6.2% in 2008 to 4.7% and 1.9% in 2016, respectively. Similar decreasing trends in smoking were found among most of the SES groups. The PDs and SII for parental education in boys and family structure in girls decreased over time while those for school type persisted among boys and girls. The PRs and RII for school type in boys increased while those for other SES indicators among both sexes remained stable over time. Conclusions Smoking among Japanese adolescents has been declining and time trends of socioeconomic inequalities in smoking varied by absolute and relative measures. Further policies and/or interventions to reduce smoking inequalities should focus on the context of schools, especially in vocational high schools.

scholarly journals Association between socioeconomic status and dental caries among Chinese preschool children: a cross-sectional national study

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. e042908
Author(s):  
Tingting Zhang ◽  
Jialan Hong ◽  
Xueting Yu ◽  
Qiulin Liu ◽  
Andi Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Preschool Children ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Dental Caries ◽  
Household Income ◽  
Parental Education ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Index Of Inequality

ObjectivesSocioeconomic inequalities in oral health are often neglected in oral health promotion. This cross-sectional study assessed the association between dental caries and socioeconomic status (SES) among preschool children in China.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingData from the Fourth National Oral Health Survey of China (2015), comprising of 40 360 children aged 3–5 years was used.MethodsDental caries indicators including prevalence of dental caries, dental pain experience and number of decayed, missing and filling teeth (dmft). SES indicators included parental education and household income. The associations between SES and dental caries were analysed by using negative binomial regression or Poisson regression models according to data distribution. Relative and absolute inequalities in dental caries were quantified by using the Relative Index of Inequality (RII) and Slope Index of Inequality (SII), respectively.ResultsThere were significant associations between SES and prevalence of dental caries and dmft (p<0.001). Children from lower educated (RII 1.36, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.43; SII 0.97, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.13) and lower household income (RII 1.17, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.24; SII 0.55, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.75) families had higher dmft than those from well-educated and most affluent families. Relative and absolute inequalities in dental caries were larger in urban areas by household income, and in rural areas by parental education.ConclusionsAssociation between dental caries and SES was demonstrated and socioeconomic inequalities in dental caries existed among Chinese preschool children.

The effects of household income distribution on stroke prevalence and its risk factors of high blood pressure and smoking: a cross-sectional study in Saskatchewan, Canada

2016 ◽  
Vol 137 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yelena Bird ◽  
Mark Lemstra ◽  
Marla Rogers
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Income Distribution ◽  
High Blood Pressure ◽  
Household Income ◽  
Lower Income ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Statistical Adjustment ◽  
Stroke Prevalence

Background: Stroke is a major chronic disease and a common cause of adult disability and mortality. Although there are many known risk factors for stroke, lower income is not one that is often discussed. Aims: To determine the unadjusted and adjusted association of income distribution on the prevalence of stroke in Saskatchewan, Canada. Methods: Information was collected from the Canadian Community Health Survey conducted by Statistics Canada for 2000–2008. In total, 178 variables were analysed for their association with stroke. Results: Prior to statistical adjustment, stroke was seven times more common for lower income residents than higher income residents. After statistical adjustment, only four covariates were independently associated with stroke prevalence, including having high blood pressure (odds ratio (OR) = 2.62; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.12–3.24), having a household income below CAD$30,000 per year (OR = 2.49; 95% CI = 1.88–3.29), being a daily smoker (OR = 1.36; 95% CI = 1.16–1.58) and being physically inactive (OR = 1.27; 95% CI = 1.13–1.43). After statistical adjustment, there were five covariates independently associated with high blood pressure prevalence, including having a household income below CAD$30,000 per year (OR = 1.52; 95% CI = 1.41–1.63). After statistical adjustment, there were five covariates independently associated with daily smoking prevalence, including having a household income below CAD$30,000 per year (OR = 1.29; 95% CI = 1.25–1.33). Conclusions: Knowledge of disparities in the prevalence, severity, disability and mortality of stroke is critically important to medical and public health professionals. Our study found that income distribution was strongly associated with stroke, its main disease intermediary – high blood pressure – and its main risk factor – smoking. As such, income is an important variable worthy of public debate as a modifiable risk factor for stroke.

scholarly journals Education-Related Inequalities in Dental Services Use among Older Adults in 23 Countries

2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (12) ◽  
pp. 1341-1347
Author(s):  
F. Bof de Andrade ◽  
J.L.F. Antunes ◽  
F.C.D. Andrade ◽  
M.F.F. Lima-Costa ◽  
J. Macinko
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
South Korea ◽  
The United States ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
Dental Services ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Relative Index ◽  
Index Of Inequality

This study aimed to measure the magnitude of education-related inequalities in the use of dental services among older adults (aged 50 y or older) from a sizable multicountry sample of 23 upper-middle- and high-income countries. This study used cross-sectional data from nationally representative surveys of people aged 50 y and over. Countries included in the Health and Retirement Study surveys were the following: Brazil, China, South Korea, Mexico, United States, Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Israel, Luxembourg, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland. The dependent variable was the use of dental services, based on the self-report of having had a dental visit within the previous year, except for the United States and South Korea, which used 2-y recall periods. Educational level was used as the measure of socioeconomic position and was standardized across countries. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was used to evaluate the factors associated with the use of dental services, and the magnitude of education inequalities in the use of dental services was assessed using the slope index of inequality (SII) to measure absolute inequalities and the relative index of inequality for relative inequalities. The pooled prevalence of the use of dental services was 31.7% and ranged from 18.7% in China to 81.2% in Sweden. In the overall sample, the absolute difference in the prevalence of use between the lowest and highest educational groups was 20 percentage points. SII was significant for all countries except Portugal. Relative educational inequalities were significant for all countries and ranged from 3.2 in Poland to 1.2 in Sweden. There were significant education-related inequalities in the use of dental care by older adults in all countries. Monitoring these inequalities is critical to the planning and delivery of dental services.

scholarly journals Diabetes: Socioeconomic Inequalities in the Portuguese Population in 2014

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joana Santos ◽  
Irina Kislaya ◽  
Liliana Antunes ◽  
Ana João Santos ◽  
Ana Paula Rodrigues ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Educational Level ◽  
Concentration Index ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Universal Coverage ◽  
Socioeconomic Inequalities ◽  
Major Public Health Problem ◽  
Relative Index ◽  
The People ◽  
Access To Health ◽  
Index Of Inequality

Introduction: Diabetes is a major public health problem and it is related to socioeconomic factors. The aim of this study is to describe socioeconomic inequalities in the distribution of diabetes in the population with 25 years or more, resident in Portugal in 2014.Material and Methods: Data from the Health National Survey 2014 was analysed, n = 16 786. We estimated the prevalence of diabetes in the population and stratified by socioeconomic variables namely educational level and income. The extent of socioeconomic inequalities was assessed using concentration index and the relative index of inequality.Results: Diabetes was found to be concentrated among the people with lower educational levels (concentration index = -0.26) and lower income quintiles (concentration index = -0.14). Relative index of inequality also showed a lower degree of inequality among the most educated (0,20; CI 95% = [0,12; 0,32]) and with higher income (0,59; CI 95% = [0,48; 0,74]).Discussion: Distribution of diabetes is associated with education and income. Previous studies have shown that although income might reflect lifestyle patterns, education reflects better social factors that are important for establishing healthier behaviours. Also, the National Health Service, of universal coverage and free of charge, might have contributed to reduce inequalities in the access to health by those with the lowest income.Conclusion: Supporting ‘Health in All Policies’ might reduce inequalities, namely by improving population educational level and actions that promote health literacy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document