scholarly journals PENGARUH PEMBELAJARAN LANGSUNG TERHADAP PEMAHAMAN KONSEP MATRIKS DAN SIKAP ILMIAH MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN TEKNIK BANGUNAN

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Enny Keristiana Sinaga ◽  
Syafiatun Siregar ◽  
Asri Lubis
Keyword(s):  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Scientific Attitude ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Study Program ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Direct Learning ◽  
Building Engineering

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan pemahaman konsep matriks dan sikap ilmiah antara mahasiswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran langsung dan model pembelajaran konvensional. Jenis penelitian ini penelitian eksperimen semu dengan rancangan Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design dengan mengambil populasi penelitian mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan teknik Bangunan semester 1  Universitas Negeri Medan tahun ajaran 2017/2018. Sampel diambil dengan cara total sampling. Data pemahaman konsep diukur dengan menggunakan tes pemahaman konsep matriks dan sikap ilmiah dengan menggunakan kuesioner. Data yang terkumpul dianalisis dengan menggunakan Manova. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data diperoleh simpulan sebagai berikut: 1) terdapat perbedaan pemahaman konsep matriks antara mahasiswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran langsung dan mahasiswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran konvensional, 2) terdapat perbedaan sikap antara mahasiswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran langsung dan mahasiswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran konvensional, 3) terdapat perbedaan pemahaman konsep matriks dan sikap ilmiah antara mahasiswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran langsung dan mahasiswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran konvensional Kata Kunci : konvensional, pemahaman konsep, pembelajaran langsung, sikap ilmiah  ABSTRACT This study aims to determine the differences in understanding the concept of matrix and scientific attitude between students who are taught by direct learning model and conventional learning model. This type of research is a quasi-experimental research with Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design design by taking research population of students of Building Engineering Education Study Program 1st semester of Medan State University of academic year 2017/2018. Samples were taken by total sampling. Data on concept comprehension is measured by using comprehension test of matrix concept and scientific attitude by using questionnaire. The collected data were analyzed using Manova. Based on the results of data analysis obtained conclusions as follows: 1) there is a difference understanding of matrix concepts between students who dibelajarkan with direct learning models and students who dibelajarkan with conventional learning model, 2) there is a difference in attitude between students who are taught by direct learning models and students who dibelajarkan with conventional learning model, 3) there is a difference understanding of matrix concept and scientific attitude between students who dibelajarkan with direct learning models and students who dibelajarkan with conventional learning model Keywords: conventional, conceptual understanding, direct learning, scientific attitude

scholarly journals PERBANDINGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF DAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN LANGSUNG TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATA PELAJARAN RANGKAIAN LISTRIK KELAS X DI SMK NEGERI 26 JAKARTA

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-47
Author(s):  
Nuvita Retna Sari ◽  
Faried Wadjdi ◽  
Massus Subekti
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Cognitive Assessment ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Direct Learning

  This study aims to determine the comparison of cooperative learning models with direct learning models on the learning outcomes of electrical circuit subjects of class X students at SMK Negeri 26 Jakarta. This research was conducted at SMK Negeri 26 Jakarta in November 2018 until January 2019. This Popolation  is class X TTL at SMK Negeri 26 Jakarta which consists of 3 classes. The research method used is true  experimental pretest posttest control group design. The sample was randomly determined by random sampling technique. It was obtained 2 classes namely X.TTL1 for experimental class using cooperative learning models and X.TTL 3  was used for experimental class using direct learning models and class X.TTL 2 was used for class testing question validity. The analysis technique used is the t test at a significance level of  Based on the results of the study it can be concluded that learning using the Cooperative Learning Model with cognitive assessment of 92.41 and psychomotor assessment of 88.98, while learning using the Direct Learning Model with cognitive assessment amounted to 92.21 and psychometric assessment of 88.21. The results of calculations with the t-test on cognitive assessment at the significance level α = 0.05 and df = 64 are tcount <  ttable(0.512 <1.6672) and the value of t-test calculated at the significance level α = 0, 05 and df = 64 is tcount < ttable (0.45 <1.6672) means that H0 is accepted, Ho is accepted so that it can be concluded that the comparison of learning outcomes of electrical circuits taught using cooperative learning models is not higher or equal  using direct learning model at SMK Negeri 26 Jakarta. ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbandingan model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan model pembelajaran langsung terhadap hasil belajar mata pelajaran rangkaian listrik siswa kelas X di SMK Negeri 26 Jakarta. Penelitian ini dilakukan di SMKN 26 Jakarta pada bulan November 2018 sampai Januari 2019. Populasi penelitian ini adalah kelas X TTL di SMK Negeri 26 Jakarta yang terdiri dari 3 kelas. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah True eksperimental Design Pretest–Posttest Control Group Design. Sampel ditentukan secara acak dengan teknik random sampling di dapat 2 kelas yaitu X.TTL 1 untuk kelas eksperimen I dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif dan X.TTL 3 digunakan untuk kelas eksperimen II dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran langsung serta Kelas X.TTL 2 digunakan uji validasi soal. Teknik Analisis yang digunakan yaitu uji t pada taraf signifikansi =0,05.Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan pembelajaran dengan menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif dengan penilaian kognitif sebesar 92.41 dan penilaian psikomotorik sebesar 88.98, sedangkan pembelajaran dengan menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Langsung dengan penilaian kognitif sebesar 92.21dan penilaian psikomotorik sebesar 88.21. Hasil perhitungan dengan Uji–t pada penilaian kognitif pada taraf signifikansi  = 0,05 dan = 64 adalah < (0.512 < 1.6672) serta diperoleh nilai Uji-t hitung pada taraf signifikansi =0,05 dan = 64 adalah>(0.45<1.6672) artinyaHo diterima sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa perbandingan hasil belajar rangkaian listrik yang diajarkan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tidak lebih tinggi atau sama dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran langsung di SMK Negeri 26 Jakarta.

scholarly journals Perbandingan Keefektifan Pembelajaran IPS Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Team Quiz dengan Teams Games Tournaments (TGT) Terhadap Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik SD Negeri Lakkang

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-32
Author(s):  
Sahabuddin Sahabuddin ◽  
Muhammad Yunus ◽  
Muhammad Nur
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Posttest Score ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Motivation And Learning

Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui adanya perbedaan motivasi dan hasil belajar peserta didik dengan membandingkan penggunaan model pembelajaran kooperatif team quiz dan TGT pada mata pelajaran IPS kelas IV di SD Negeri Lakkang. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah quasi experimental nonequivalent control group design. Teknik penentuan sampel pada penelitian ini menggunakan purposive sampling. Uji validitas butir soal berdasarkan penilaian para ahli (judgement expert) dan uji reliabilitas Cronbach Alpha. Teknik analisis yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini meliputi uji normalitas, uji homogenitas, uji keefektifan, uji perbandingan keefektifan model pembelajaran, dan uji keunggulan dengan menggunakan pengolahan SPSS versi 25.0. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa motivasi dan hasil belajar peserta didik yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif team quiz lebih tinggi dibanding dengan peserta didik yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif TGT. Hal ini ditunjukkan dengan hasil uji setelah perlakuan posttest dengan uji Manova. Data setelah perlakuan posttest dengan uji Manova menunjukkan bahwa nilai signifikansinya lebih kecil alfa (0,05) yaitu sebesar 0,001 sehingga H0 ditolak. Maka dari itu, dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan rata-rata kemampuan kedua kelas terhadap motivasi belajar dan hasil belajar peserta didik setelah diberikan perlakuan. Dengan demikian, peserta didik yang menggunakan penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif team quiz memiliki rata-rata nilai posttest lebih tinggi yaitu 85,35 dibanding peserta didik yang menggunakan penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif TGT yang mempunyai jumlah rata-rata nilai posttest sebanyak 80,05. This research was conducted with the aim of knowing the differences in students' motivation and learning outcomes by comparing the use of the team quiz and TGT cooperative learning models in social studies subjects for class IV at SD Negeri Lakkang. The method used in this study was a quasi-experimental nonequivalent control group design. The sampling technique in this study used purposive sampling. The validity tes of the items based on the assessment of experts (expert judgment) and Cronbach Alpha reliability test. The analytical techniques of data used in this study include normality test, homogeneity test, effectiveness test, comparative test of the effectiveness of learning models, and superiority test using SPSS version 25.0 processing. The results showed that the motivation and learning outcomes of students who used the team quiz cooperative learning model were higher than those of students who used the TGT cooperative learning model. This is indicated by the test results after posttest treatment with the Manova test. The data after posttest treatment with the Manova test showed that the significance value was smaller than alfa (0.05), which was 0.001 so that H0 was rejected. Therefore, it can be concluded that there is a difference in the average ability between the two classes on learning motivation and student learning outcomes after the treatment was given. Thus, students who use the application of the team quiz cooperative learning model have a higher average posttest score of 85.35 than students who use the application of the TGT cooperative learning model who have an average posttest score of 80.05.

PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN COOPERATIVE INTEGRATED READING AND COMPOSITION (CIRC) TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN MENENTUKAN IDE POKOK PARAGRAF SISWA KELAS V SD NEGERI 003 PULAU KOPUNG KECAMATAN SENTAJO RAYA KABUPATEN KUANTAN SINGINGI

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuwanda Megri Santika ◽  
Otang Kurniaman ◽  
Zariul Antosa
Keyword(s):  
Main Idea ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Communication Process ◽  
Fifth Grade ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Fifth Grade Students ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Main Ideas

Reading is one of the important aspects in the communication process. Reading can make someone better understand the contents of the reading. In learning to make it easier for students to understand the contents of the reading it will be easier if it begins with the ability to determine the main ideas of the paragraph. Based on this, the researcher conducted a study by applying the Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) learning model to the ability to determine the main idea of the paragraph at the fifth grade students of SD 003 Pulau Kopung. This study aims to determine the effect of the CIRC learning model on the ability to determine the main ideas of paragraphs of fifth grade students of SD Negeri 003 Pulau Kopung. This research method is a quasi- experimental Nonequivalent Control Group Design. This research was conducted in two classes, the VA class as the control class and VB class as the experimental class with 22 students in each class. The results of the study showed that the CIRC learning model influenced the ability to determine paragraph main ideas with the results of calculations derived from the gain index, the experimental class using the CIRC learning model got an increase in gain of 0.59 with the middle class and the control class with the normal learning model got an increase of 0.31 with medium class.

scholarly journals The Effect of Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Model With Outdoor Approach Towards the Students’ Ability of Mathematical Representation

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hermawan Gatot Priyadi ◽  
◽  
Yumiati Yumiati
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Research ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Mathematical Representation ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Contextual Teaching ◽  
Experimental Group

This study aimed to determine the effect of the implementation of the Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) model with the outdoor approach towards students’ ability in mathematical representation. It was quasi-experimental research consisting of two experimental classes and one control group. It used a pretest-posttest control group design. The population of this study was the students of SUPM Tegal. Sampling was conducted using cluster random consisting of three classes. The first experimental group was carried out by implementing the learning model of CTL with the outdoor approach. The second experimental group was carried out by implementing a learning model of CTL, while the control group was conducted by implementing a conventional learning model. The research instrument was a 7-point mathematical representation test in the form of an essay. The results of the research were 1) the learning model of CTL with an outdoor approach affected the improvement and achievement of the students’ ability in mathematical representation and was higher than CTL and a conventional learning; 2) the improvement of the students’ ability of representation in the groups of CTL with outdoor approach, CTL, and conventional learning respectively was in high, medium, and low category.

scholarly journals The effect of the group investigation-guided inquiry (GI-GI) learning model to improve students’ collaboration and science process skills

2021 ◽  
Vol 2104 (1) ◽  
pp. 012027
Author(s):  
Indrawati ◽  
I K Mahardika ◽  
J Prihatin ◽  
Supeno ◽  
S Astutik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Schools ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Process Skills ◽  
Guided Inquiry ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Science Process Skills ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Abstract The GI-GI learning model is a combination of the Group Investigation and the Guided Inquiry model. The research aimed to examine the effect of the GI-GI learning model on collaboration and students’ science process skills. The type of research carried out was Quasi-Experimental and used a post-test only control group design and purposive sampling covering four high schools in the Besuki Residency, two classes as the experimental class and the control class. The research instrument used tests, observations, and documentation. The results showed a significant effect of the GI-GI learning model on collaboration and students’ science process skills. This research implies that the GI-GI learning model can condition students to research in groups to interact actively with friends and educators to exchange opinions, knowledge, or experiences, find and solve problems, and hypothesize through investigation, exploration, and discussion outside or inside in class.

scholarly journals Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Bahasa Indonesia dengan Membandingkan Model Pembelajaran RADEC dan Model Pembelajaran Konvensional

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 13-19
Author(s):  
Neneng Maryani ◽  
Karin Nurseptiani
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Data ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Class V ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Learning Techniques ◽  
Conventional Models ◽  
Learning Interest

This research is based on field findings, namely low interest in learning Indonesian, lack of teacher initiative to use varied learning models that cause students to become bored in following the learning process in Indonesian subjects. The purpose of this study is to find out the increased interest in learning Indonesian by comparing the RADEC (Read, Answer, Discuss, Explain, and Create) learning models and conventional learning. The research method used was Nonequivalent Control Group Design with a population of 173 students, and two sample classes namely class V as an experimental class totaling 28 students and class VI as a control class totaling 37 students. From the results by statistical data using SPSS version 24.0 for windows after the data are declared normally distributed and come from homogeneous samples through normality and homogeneity tests, it is known that the results of hypothesis testing using the Compare Means test with Independent Samples Test obtained sig = 0,000. Because the significance <0.05, it can be concluded that Ho is rejected, which means "There is a difference in the increase in interest in learning Indonesian by using the RADEC learning model compared to using the conventional model in SD Negeri Sukamaju, Pagerageung District, Tasikmalaya District". The score is in the interval 66.4 -70.1. Based on this, it can be concluded that the implementation of the RADEC learning model is quite successful in increasing interest in learning Indonesian compared to using conventional models. Suggestions that can be recommended based on the findings of this study include expected to be able to develop RADEC learning models that are collaborated with other learning techniques as an innovation to increase learning interest.

scholarly journals Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Make a Match untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Materi Larutan Elektrolit dan Non Elekrolit di Kelas X Madrasah Aliya DDI Lonja

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Muslimah Muslimah ◽  
Kasmudin Mustapa ◽  
Ratman Ratman
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Experimental Group ◽  
Better Than

This research describes the differences of student’s learning with the application of cooperative learning type make a match in the electrolyte and non-electrolyte at the X grade student’s of the Madrasah Aliya DDI Lonja. This research used quasi experimental with non randomized pretest-posttest control group design. This research was conducted with two groups: XA as the experimental (n=21) XB as the control group (n=18). The data findings means score of experimental group (X1) is 70,5 with the standard deviation 9,6 and the control group (X2) is 62.0 with the standard deviation is 6. Based on the results, the researcher concludes cooperative learning type make a match has better than control class that used conventional learning model.

scholarly journals Komparasi Model Pembelajaran Konstruktivis Metakognitif Dan Konstruktivis Novick Terhadap Berpikir Kritis Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Akademik

INFERENSI ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Baskoro Adi Prayitno ◽  
Bowo Sugiharto
Keyword(s):  
Academic Achievement ◽  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Grade Student ◽  
Conventional Model ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Equivalent Control

The purpose of this study was to investigate, (1) the influence of constructivist metacognitive model compared to constructivist novick, and conventional model toward critical thinking, (2) the influence of academic achievement toward critical thinking, and (3) interaction of learning model and academic achievement toward critical thinking. The sample of this study consisted of 102 eleventh grade student from 3 state senior high schools in Surakarta. The method used in this study is a quasi-experimental research Pretest-Posttest, Non-Equivalent Control Group Design. Anacova was used to analyze the data. Critical thinking test was administered to the experimental and the control group as pre and post-tests to measure the critical thinking. The result showed that, (1) constructivist metacognitive and constructivist novick are not significantly different but those are significantly different from the conventional model toward critical thinking, (2) Upper academic students have higher critical thinking than lower academic students, (3) There is not interaction of learning model and academic achievement toward critical thinking

scholarly journals STUDI KOMPARATIF MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK PAIR SQUARE DAN THINK PAIR SHARE TERHADAP MOTIVASI DAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA MAPEL TIK KELAS X SMA N 1 SUKASADA

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Putu Deli Januartini ◽  
Ketut Agustini ◽  
I Gede Partha Sindu
Keyword(s):  
Direct Instruction ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Very High

 AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui (1) pengaruh signifikan penggunaan model pembelajaran Think Pair Square dan Think Pair Share terhadap hasil belajar siswa, (2) hasil belajar yang lebih baik antara model pembelajaran Think Pair Square  atau  Think Pair Share, (3) motivasi belajar siswa, (4) respon siswa.Jenis penelitian ini adalah eksperimen semu dengan rancangan Post Test Only Control Group Design. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah kelas X1 dengan model Think Pair Square, kelas X3 dengan model Think Pair Share dan X5 dengan model Direct Instruction.Data hasil belajar dianalisis melalui uji prasyarat dengan hasil ketiga kelompok berdistribusi normal dan homogen serta uji hipotesis menggunakan Anova Satu Jalur dengan hasil terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan penggunaan model pembelajaran Think Pair Square, Think Pair Share dan Direct Instruction. Kemudian uji lanjut t-Scheffe dengan hasil terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar penggunaan model pembelajaran Think Pair Square, Think Pair Share dan Direct Instruction. Dilihat dari rata-rata hasil belajar maka disimpulkan model Think Pair Square lebih baik dengan hasil belajar lebih tinggi. Hasil analisis angket Think Pair Square diketahui respon sangat positif dan tingkat motivasi belajar sangat tinggi, Think Pair Share diketahui respon positif dan tingkat motivasi belajar sangat tinggi. Kata kunci:  Think Pair Square, Think Pair Share, Direct Instruction, hasil belajar, motivasi belajar, dan respon siswa. AbstractThe purpose of this study were to determine (1) the significant influence of the application of think pair square and think pair share learning model on student’s learning achievement, (2) better learning achievement between think pair square and think pair share learning model, (3) student’s motivation, (4) the student’s responses.The research was a quasi-experimental design experiment with post test only control group design. The population of study was all the students in grade X. The sample were as X1 class with the application of Think Pair Square learning model, X3 class with the application of Think Pair Share learning model, and X5 class with the application of Direct Instruction learning model.The data was collected by cognitive and psychomotor tests. The student’s learning achievement were analyzed by the prerequisite test with the results of the three groups at normal distribution and homogenous, and the hypothesis tested by One Way Anova which means there is a significant effect on the application of think pair square, think pair share, and direct instruction learning models. Then it was conducted a further test t-Scheffe with the results there are differences in the learning achievement between think pair square, think pair share, and direct instruction learning models. According to the average result we made a conclusion that Think Pair Square was better learning models with higher student’s learning achievement. The questionnaires results shows that Think Pair Square was very high positiveresponse and very high learning motivation, Think Pair Share was high positive response and very high learning motivation. Keywords :   Think Pair Square, Think Pair Share, Direct Instruction, learning achievement, learning motivation, and student response. 

scholarly journals Pembelajaran Search, Solve, Create and Share (SSCS) untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep dan Disposisi Matematis Siswa

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 97
Author(s):  
Isna Rafianti ◽  
Khairida Iskandar ◽  
Lilis Haniyah
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Mathematical Concepts ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Equivalent Control ◽  
Mathematical Dispositions

Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh rendahnya hasil belajar matematika siswa di Indonesia. Hal ini disebabkan  oleh  beberapa  faktor,  diantaranya  adalah  rendahnya  kemampuan  pemahaman  konsep matematis dan didukung oleh rendahnya disposisi matematis siswa yaitu apresiasi terhadap pembelajaran matematika. Salah satu upaya untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis dan disposisi matematis siswa adalah dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Search, Solve, Create and Share  (SSCS)  yang  menjadikan  siswa  mandiri,  aktif  dan  fokus  dalam  pembelajaran  matematika. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui peningkatan kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis dan disposisi matematis siswa dengan menggunakan model SSCS dalam pembelajaran matematika. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan desain non-equivalent control group design. Subyek penelitian ini adalah kelas VIII C (eksperimen) dan VIII D (kontrol) semester 2 SMPN 2 Kota Serang. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah soal tes kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis dan skala disposisi matematis. Data hasil penelitian ini dianalisis menggunakan uji normalitas, uji homogenitas, uji perbedaan rata-rata. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran SSCS lebih baik dari siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional. Disposisi matematis yang menggunakan model pembelajaran SSCS memiliki peningkatan yang lebih rendah atau sama dengan siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional. Dengan demikian model pembelajaran SSCS bisa diterapkan untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis namun kurang efektif dalam peningkatan disposisi matematis siswa SMP. Kata kunci: Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis, Disposisi Matematis, Model Pembelajaran Search, Solve, Create and Share (SSCS) ABSTRACT This research is motivated by the low mathematics learning result of students in Indonesia. This is caused by several factors, such as the low ability of understanding mathematical concepts and supported by the low mathematical disposition of students is the appreciation of mathematics learning. One of the efforts to improve the students' understanding of mathematical concepts and mathematical dispositions is by using Search, Solve, Create and Share (SSCS) learning model which makes students self-reliant, active and focused in learning mathematics. This study aims to determine the improvement of the ability to comprehend mathematical concepts and mathematical disposition of students by using SSCS model in mathematics learning. This research uses quasi experimental method with non-equivalent control group design. The subjects of this research are class VIII C (experiment) and VIII D (control) semester 2 SMPN 2 Serang City. The instrument used in this research is the ability to comprehend mathematical concepts and mathematical disposition scale. Data of this study were analyzed using normality test, homogeneity test, two-party test, and one-party test. The conclusion of this research is the ability of understanding mathematical concepts of students using SSCS learning model better than students using conventional learning model. While mathematical dispositions using SSCS learning models have a lower or equal increase with students using conventional learning models. Thus the SSCS learning model can be applied to improve the comprehension of mathematical concepts but less effective in improving mathematical disposition of Junior High School students.   Keywords: Ability  to  Understand  Mathematical  Concept,  Mathematical  Disposition,  Search,  Solve, Create and Share Learning Model (SSCS)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document