scholarly journals Kajian Yuridis Hak Angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Terhadap Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (Dikaji dari Perspektif Hukum Tata Negara)

Acta Comitas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 142
Author(s):  
I Gusti Ngurah Adityanatha
Keyword(s):  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Vice President ◽  
Independent State ◽  
State Commission ◽  
State Administration ◽  
Constitutional System ◽  
The Right ◽  
National Police

The House of Representatives as a legislative commission has the privilege of being a right of inquiry in order to run a system of government that is check and balances. With regard to the right of inquiry The House of Representatives to The Corruption Eradication Commission, it is feared to be used as a means to influence and interfere with The Corruption Eradication Commission, even weaken the role of The Corruption Eradication Commission as an independent institution free from any influence of power. Regarding the formulation of the problem in this scientific research is, how the position of The Corruption Eradication Commission in the constitutional system in Indonesia as an independent institution? and whether The House of Representatives may use the right of inquiry to The Corruption Eradication Commission? The type of research used in this scientific research is normative legal research. The Corruption Eradication Commission is an independent state commission in Indonesia that is outside the realm of the three original powers of executive, legislative, and judicial (trias potilica) in the state administration system in Indonesia, so that The Corruption Eradication Commission can not be subject to the right of inquiry by The House of Representatives. It is also reinforced by the subject of a limited questionnaire on the implementation of a law and / or government policy carried out solely by The President, Vice President, State Minister, Commander of the Indonesian National Army, the Chief of the Indonesian National Police, the Attorney General, or the non-ministerial government agencies. Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat sebagai lembaga legislatif memiliki hak istimewa yakni hak angket dalam rangka menjalankan sistem pemerintahan yang bersifat check and balances. Terkait dengan hak angket terhadap Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi oleh Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, dikhawatirkan digunakan sebagai sarana untuk mempengaruhi dan mengintervensi Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi, bahkan dapat melemahkan peran Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi sebagai lembaga independen dan bebas dari pengaruh kekuasaan manapun. Mengenai rumusan masalah dalam karya ilmiah ini yaitu, bagaimanakah kedudukan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi dalam sistem ketatanegaraan di Indonesia sebagai lembaga independen? dan apakah Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat dapat menggunakan hak angket terhadap Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi? Jenis penelitian yang digunakan pada karya ilmiah ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi merupakan komisi negara independen di Indonesia yang berada di luar ranah tiga poros kekuasaan asli yaitu eksekutif, legislatif, dan yudisial (trias potilica) dalam sistem ketatanegaraan di Indonesia, sehingga Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi tidak dapat dijadikan subjek dari hak angket oleh Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat. Hal tersebut juga diperkuat dengan subjek dari hak angket yang terbatas pada pelaksanaan suatu undang-undang dan/atau kebijakan pemerintah yang dilaksanakan sendiri oleh Presiden, Wakil Presiden, Menteri Negara, Panglima Tentara Nasional Indonesia, Kepala Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia, Jaksa Agung, atau pimpinan lembaga pemerintah non-kementerian.

scholarly journals Impeachment in The State System

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
Nurwita Ismail
Keyword(s):  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Vice President ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Process ◽  
Administration System ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Head Of State ◽  
State Administration ◽  
Broad Interpretation ◽  
Constitutional System

Impeachment In Constitutional System. This paper aims: To know and analyze how the impeachment arrangements in the Indonesian state administration system; To know and analyze how the legal process in impeachment mechanism before amendment and after an amendment of 1945 Constitution; by using Normative Method The study conducted in this research is the literature. Impeachment of the President and Vice President of his / her position is not new in the Indonesian state administration system. Both before the amendment and after the amendment of the 1945 Constitution. The 1945 Constitution of the amendment result has specified the provisions concerning the Impeachment of the President and Vice President as head of state. However, the mechanism of the impeachment process is determined in a constitutionally eliminative manner even though these reasons have a very broad interpretation and may be subjective, especially in a political institution of the DPR, by which there are several things to be considered in the impeachment process in Indonesia, such as the impeachment process in the House of Representatives Regional and process of Impeachment in the Constitutional Court. There is a need for the provision of legal products or the making of procedural law which regulates the impeachment of the President and Vice President.

scholarly journals KEDUDUKAN KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI DALAM SISTEM KETATANEGARAAN INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 163
Author(s):  
Mahesa Rannie
Keyword(s):  
Welfare State ◽  
House Of Representatives ◽  
State Institution ◽  
Executive Power ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Independent State ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
The Law ◽  
Constitutional System ◽  
The Right

Abstrak Kedudukan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) dalam sistem ketatanegaraan Indonesia memang seringkali diperdebatkan, hal ini terbukti dengan Putusan-Putusan MK yang berubah-ubah. Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam putusannya pernah beberapa kali memutuskan berbeda tentang kedudukan KPK ini dalam sistem ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Mahkamah Konstitusi pernah memutuskan KPK merupakan lembaga negara independen di luar ranah kekuasaan eksekutif, legislatif, dan yudikatif. Pernah pula memutuskan bahwa KPK merupakan eksekutif dilihat dari kewenangannya. Putusan-putusan MK ini tentu saja membawa pengaruh terhadap undang-undang KPK. Revisi undang-undang KPK terbaru, yaitu Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 menyatakan KPK masuk dalam ranah kekuasaan eksekutif sehingga dengan demikian KPK dapat menjadi objek hak angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR). Hal demikian tentu saja menambah panjang perdebatan di kalangan ahli hukum dengan argumentasinya masing-masing. Dari argumentasi-argumentasi tersebut penulis menganggap KPK adalah lembaga negara independen di luar struktur organ negara yang utama. Hal ini sejalan dengan theory the new separation of power sebagai konsekuensi dari teori negara kesejahteraan (welfare state) di era abad modern ini. Sebagai lembaga negara independen yang kedudukannya tidak sekuat lembaga negara utama dalam ranah kekuasaan eksekutif, legislatif, dan yudikatif tentu saja KPK bisa dibubarkan jika lembaga yang selama ini sebetulnya mempunyai wewenang kuat untuk melaksanakan penegakan hukum dalam rangka pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi (Kepolisian dan Kejaksaan) mampu berbenah diri. Selama belum mampu berbenah maka wewenang tersebut bisa dilaksanakan oleh KPK yang keberadaannya sampai saat ini masih tetap diperlukan dalam rangka pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia. Kata kunci: Kedudukan KPK, Sistem Ketatanegaraan, Indonesia Abstract The position of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) in the constitutional system of Indonesia is often debated. This is evidenced by the inconsistent decisions of the Constitutional Court. The Constitutional Court has ever made different decisions several times regarding the position of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) in the constitutional system of Indonesia. The Constitutional Court once decided that the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) was an independent state institution outside the realm of executive, legislative and judicial powers. It has also decided that the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) is an executive body in terms of its authority. These inconsistent decisions of the Constitutional Court, of course, have an influence on the law of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). The latest revision of the law of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), namely the Law Number 19 of 2019 states that the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) is classified to be in the realm of executive power so that the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) can become the object of the right to inquiry by the House of Representatives (DPR). This situation, of course, adds to the length of debate among legal experts with their respective arguments. Based on these arguments, the writer considers that the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) is an independent state institution outside the main state organ structure. This is in line with the theory of the new separation of power as a consequence of the theory of the welfare state in this modern era. As an independent state institution whose position is not as strong as the main state institutions in the realm of executive, legislative and judicial powers, of course, the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) can be dissolved if the institutions that actually have strong authority to carry out law enforcement in the context of eradicating criminal acts of corruption (Police and Prosecutors) are able to empower themselves to execute their authority. However, if those institutions have not been able to execute their authority, this authority can be exercised by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), whose existence is still needed in the context of eradicating criminal acts of corruption in Indonesia.

scholarly journals Impeachment In The State System

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Substantive Justice ◽  
Nurwita Ismail
Keyword(s):  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Vice President ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Administration System ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Head Of State ◽  
System P ◽  
State Administration ◽  
Broad Interpretation ◽  
Constitutional System

PUBLISHED ON www.substantivejustice.id Vol.1 (1) March 2018 Impeachment In Constitutional System. This paper aims: To know and analyze how the impeachment arrangements in the Indonesian state administration system; To know and analyze how the legal process in impeachment mechanism before amendment and after an amendment of 1945 Constitution; by using Normative Method The study conducted in this research is the literature. Impeachment of the President and Vice President of his / her position is not new in the Indonesian state administration system. Both before the amendment and after the amendment of the 1945 Constitution. The 1945 Constitution of the amendment result has specified the provisions concerning the Impeachment of the President and Vice President as head of state. However, the mechanism of the impeachment process is determined in a constitutionally eliminative manner even though these reasons have a very broad interpretation and may be subjective, especially in a political institution of the DPR, by which there are several things to be considered in the impeachment process in Indonesia, such as the impeachment process in the House of Representatives Regional and process of Impeachment in the Constitutional Court. There is a need for the provision of legal products or the making of procedural law which regulates the impeachment of the President and Vice President.

scholarly journals MPR DALAM SISTEM KETATANEGARAAN INDONESIA (STUDI KOMPARATIF ANTARA SEBELUM DAN SESUDAH PERUBAHAN UUD 1945)

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 91
Author(s):  
I Wayan Eka Santika ◽  
I Gede Sujana
Keyword(s):  
House Of Representatives ◽  
State Institution ◽  
Vice President ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The People ◽  
State Administration ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Election System ◽  
Constitutional System

<p><em>The purpose of this research was to determine the People's Consultative Assembly in the Indonesian constitutional system. This research was a type of library research which is descriptive analytic through a qualitative approach that is based on comparative studies. The results of this research indicated that there are fundamental differences between the People's Consultative Assembly before and after the amendment to the 1945 Constitution. The differences included (1) the change in the position of the People's Consultative Assembly from the highest state institution to a state institution that is equal to other state institutions, (2) changes in the membership structure of the People's Consultative Assembly from those previously consisted of House of Representatives, Group Envoys and Regional Representatives, then became members of the House of Representatives and Regional Representative Board members, (3) the policy to appoint People's Consultative Assembly members was replaced by an election system, (4) the People's Consultative Assembly no longer stipulates the Broad Outlines of the Nation's Direction along with filling the position of President through participation the people directly in the election, (5) limitation of the People's Consultative Assembly's authority in amending the 1945 Constitution, (6) the inauguration of the President and / or Vice President in normal and abnormal conditions, (8) the authority of the People's Consultative Assembly to dismiss the President and / or Vice President must be through a forum previlegiatum.</em></p><p><strong>Keywords</strong>: <em>People's Consultative Assembly, State Administration, Amendment to the 1945 Constitution.</em></p>

scholarly journals The constitutional court function of the Indonesian state concerning system for the implementation impeachment of the president and/or vice president

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-127
Author(s):  
H Muhamad Rezky Pahlawan MP
Keyword(s):  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Vice President ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
History Of ◽  
Three Stages ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Constitutional System

Impeachment is an accusation or indictment of the President or another country's high officials from his position. Impeachment is not new in the history of Indonesian constitution, but the change in the Constitution has caused a change in the constitutional system as well as related to the mechanism of the dismissal of the President and / or Vice President. how is the Impeachment reviewed globally, the history of impeachment in Indonesia and the implementation of impeachment in other countries, the impeachment process of the president according to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The process of impeachment in Indonesia after changing the constitution goes through three stages, namely impeachment in the House of Representatives, the Court The Constitution, and the People's Consultative Assembly. Keywords: Impeachment, Constitutional Court, Government

scholarly journals PERAN KOMISI YUDISIAL DALAM SISTEM KETATANEGARAAN INDONESIA

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Ujang Bahar
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
House Of Representatives ◽  
State Institution ◽  
Independent State ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
State Audit ◽  
Judicial Authority ◽  
Constitutional System ◽  
Selection Of

The Judicial Commission (JC) is a new independent state institution established as a product of the reform in the constitutional system and its existence is confirmed in the 1945 Constitution. The Judicial Commission was established following the idea of a one-roof system in the judicial authority. Among the roles and authority of the Judicial Commission are to propose appointment of the Supreme Court justices to the House of Representatives (DPR) and to supervise the conducts of justices/judges in order to maintain their respect, dignity and honor and good conduct.  However, in the performance of its duties, the Judicial Commission is not yet as independent as it has been expected. It can be seen from its limited authority. In supervising the conduct of the judges/justices, the Commission is not authorized to impose any sanctions and in the process of selection of candidates for the Supreme Court justices, its authority is limited only at the ratio 3:1. Therefore, the existence of the Commission under the 1945 Constitution becomes unclear, since it is placed under the chapter of the judicial authority, but in reality it does not exercise its judicial authority and only functions as a supervisory agency like the State Audit Board (BPK) instead. Consequently, the Commission only serves as the supporting institution to the Supreme Court, President and the House of Representatives. In order that the Commission becomes truly independent as an institution which supervises the implementation of the judicial power sitting at an equal level with other state institutions, it is necessary to strengthen the institution by making amendments (to re-determine the position of the Judicial Commission) in the 1945 Constitution and other relevant laws and regulations.

scholarly journals ANALISIS YURIDIS CABANG PEMERINTAHAN KEEMPAT DALAM STRUKTUR KETATANEGARAAN DI INDONESIA

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Tri Suhendra Arbani
Keyword(s):  
Constitutional Law ◽  
State System ◽  
Modern State ◽  
Independent State ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
Government Functions ◽  
State Commission ◽  
New Institutions ◽  
Constitutional System ◽  
State Body

AbstractThe development of the modern state system is also followed by the establishment of new institutions as a support of the institutions that have been there before. The most significant event in the development and establishment of institutions is the new power branch, which is called by the experts in constitutional as an independent state commission. Independent state commission institution which, if seen from the character and the authority, the agency in some literature in American constitutional law is referred to as the fourth branch of power (The Fourth Branch of Government). Some things that make this institution called the fourth branch of government (The Fourth Branch of Government) is the fact that the agency, or commission or the state body run more than one function of government as well. The existence of a fourth branch of government (The Fourth Branch of Government) with the characteristics of state institutions whose authorities are quasi, combinations, as well as the accumulation of three existing government functions and make this institution to be difficult to identify in thought Trias Politica. The phenomenon of the rise of an institution with a new concept that has influenced the constitutional system in many countries.AbstrakPerkembangan sistem ketatanegaaran modern dikuti pula dengan terbentuknya lembaga-lembaga baru sebagai penunjang dari lembaga yang telah ada sebelumnya. Hal yang paling signifikan dalam perkembangan dan pembentukan institusi domokratis tersebut tidak lain adalah cabang kekuasaan baru yang biasa disebut oleh kalangan ahli tata negara sebagai komisi negara independen.  Lembaga komisi negara independen yang jika dilihat dari sifat dan kewengannya, lembaga tersebut dalam beberapa literatur hukum tata negara di Amerika disebut sebagai cabang kekuasaan keempat (The Fourth Branch of Goverment). Beberapa hal yang membuat lembaga negara ini disebut sebagai cabang pemerintahan keempat (The Fourth Branch of Government) adalah fakta bahwa lembaga, atau komisi atau badan negara tersebut menjalankan lebih dari satu bahkan ketiga fungsi pemerintahan sekaligus. Eksistensi cabang pemerintahan keempat (The Fourth Branch of Government) dengan karakteristik lembaga negara yang kewenangannya yang bersifat kuasi, kombinasi, maupun akumulasi dari tiga fungsi pemerintahan yang ada dan menjadikan lembaga ini untuk sulit diidentifikasi dalam pemikiran Trias Politica. Fenomena munculnya sebuah lembaga dengan konsep baru tersebut telah ikut mempengaruhi sistem ketatanegaraan dibanyak negara.

scholarly journals HAK ANGKET SEBAGAI FUNGSI PENGAWASAN DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 385
Author(s):  
Mei Susanto
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Privacy Rights ◽  
Policy Changes ◽  
Public Officials ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

ABSTRAKPutusan Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017 menguji konstitusionalitas objek hak angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat terhadap Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana hak angket menurut putusan a quo dikonstruksikan sebagai fungsi pengawasan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, dan bagaimana implikasinya terhadap objek hak angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat dalam ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian doktrinal, dengan menggunakan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder yang relevan dengan objek penelitian. Penelitian menyimpulkan, pertama, putusan a quo telah mengkonstruksikan hak angket tidak hanya dalam kerangka pengawasan yang hasilnya berujung pada penjatuhan sanksi bagi pejabat publik yang melanggar undang-undang, melainkan juga pengawasan pelaksanaan undang-undang yang hasilnya berupa perubahan kebijakan dalam rangka perubahan undang-undang (legislasi) maupun kebijakan lainnya. Putusan a quo juga mengkonstruksi Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi sebagai lembaga negara penunjang dalam ranah eksekutif yang independen, namun tetap dapat menjadi objek hak angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat. Kedua, putusan a quo secara positif berimplikasi dapat digunakannya hak angket dalam rangka perubahan undang-undang sehingga dapat meningkatkan efektivitas legislasi, namun secara negatif berimplikasi dapat digunakannya hak angket secara eksesif terhadap kelembagaan yang dijamin independensinya dan terhadap objek yang seharusnya tidak dapat diselidiki karena dilindungi hukum, misalnya hak privasi dan penegakan hukum. Implikasi eksesif tersebut disebabkan putusan a quo tidak memberikan batasan terhadap penggunaan hak angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat.Kata kunci: Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, hak angket, pengawasan. ABSTRACTConstitutional Court Decision Number 36/PUUXV/2017 examines the constitutionality of the inquiry right’s object of the House of Representatives over the Corruption Eradication Commission. The problem in this study is how inquiry right is constructed as a supervisory function of the House based on decision a quo, and what the implications are for the object of the House’s inquiry right in Indonesian state administration. This doctrinal research uses primary and secondary legal materials relevant to the object of research. The study concludes that (1) the decision a quo constructs the right of inquiry not only within the framework of supervision which results in the imposition of sanctions on public officials violating the law, but also supervision of the implementation of laws resulting in policy changes in the terms of amendment of laws and other policies; (2) a quo ruling can positively imply the right of inquiry to be used in the context of amending the law to improve the effectiveness of legislation, but it can negatively have implications for inquiry rights that are excessively used against independency-guaranteed institutions and for objects that cannot be investigated because they are protected by the law, such as privacy rights and law enforcement. The excessive implication of this decision will happen as it does not define the limits on the House’s inquiry right to invesigate into a specific issue.Keywords: House of Representatives, inquiry right, supervision.

scholarly journals Questioning the Existence of The Indonesian Commision State : An Idea of Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 255
Author(s):  
Putu Eva Ditayani Antari
Keyword(s):  
The State ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Main Task ◽  
Reform Era ◽  
Current State ◽  
Government Power ◽  
State Commission ◽  
State Administration ◽  
Constitutional System

This research focuses on the phenomenon of the large number of state commissions in Indonesia, especially in the post-reform era. The purpose of this study is to describe the classification of state commissions in Indonesia. Furthermore, through the idea of simplifying the state commission, it will be able to overcome the problems that often occur due to the large number of state commissions. Through doctrinal legal research using a conceptual and comparative approach, it is known that state commissions are formed as a form of democracy, where there are independent institutions with the main task of supervising the three axes of state power (trias politica), especially in the sphere of government power. This state commission has a legal basis for the formation of various institutions through laws, government regulations, or presidential regulations so that not all state commissions have an equal position in the state administration. Furthermore, the incidental and responsive nature of the formation of state commissions often results in overlapping powers of state commissions. In order to resolve this, the idea is to make simplifications for the current State commission. The act of simplification is carried out by only maintaining a few State commissions that are capable of supporting the spirit of democracy in the State. Meanwhile, other commissions were merged into institutions of other countries. Furthermore, it is given legitimacy based on law to the State commission, so that it is not difficult to determine its position in the Indonesian constitutional system  

scholarly journals Kedudukan Hak Angket sebagai Fungsi Pengawasan terhadap Penyelenggaraan Negara

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-122
Author(s):  
Sri Amlinawaty Muin
Keyword(s):  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Research Results ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
Council House

Tujuan Penelitian untuk menganalisis kedudukan hak angket sebagai fungsi pengawasan terhadap penyelenggaraan negara. Metode Penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitan hukum mormatif. Hasil penelitian bahwa  Hak Angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (Pasal 20A ayat (2)) mengatur dan merekomendasikan diatur dengan Undang-Undang dengan asumsi dan dengan keinginan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Presidensil adalah juga Parlemen harus punya hak sebagai bagian dari Fungsi Pengawasan yang dimiliki Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat. Hasil Penelitian menunjukkan penggunaannya cenderung royal bahkan sasarannya melebar menjadi alat penekan terhadap Pemerintah. Ini terjadi sebagai akibat belum diaturnya dalam Undang-Undang tentang Hak Angket. The purpose of the study was to analyze the position of the questionnaire right as a function of supervision of state administration. The research method used is a normative legal research method. The results of the study that the House of Representatives' Questioning Rights (Article 20A paragraph (2)) regulates and recommends are regulated by law with the assumption and with the wishes of the House of Representatives in the Presidential Government System that the Parliament must have the right as part of the Oversight Function owned by the Council House of Representatives. Research results show that their use tends to be royal even the target is widening to be a pressure tool on the Government. This happened as a result of not having been regulated in the Law on Questionnaire Rights.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document