scholarly journals KEABSAHAAN SERTIPIKAT HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH BERDASARKAN UUPA DAN PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR 24 TAHUN 1997 TENTANG PENDAFTARAN TANAH

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 462
Author(s):  
Emerlanda Leticia ◽  
Hasni Hasni
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Property Ownership ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Proof Of Ownership ◽  
The Right ◽  
Ownership Rights ◽  
Legal Consequences

The certificate is a proof of ownership that is strong, this certificate comes from land rights which are the right to use and exploit the land which it occupies. Rights to land are also divided into Property Rights, Cultivation Rights, Building Use Rights, Use Rights, Rental Rights for Buildings, Use Rights and Temporary Land Rights. In this case the author will only explain the ownership rights related to legal issues, namely the right of ownership. Property rights are the strongest and most complete rights that humans can have. This right is obtained based on land registration. Own land registration is carried out by the authorized party, namely the National Land Agency. But in this case on the island of Pari, the certificate was declared maladministration by the ORI which caused the author to write about the validity of the certificate of land ownership based on law. With the formulation of the problem, how is the validity of the Certificate of Property Ownership according to uupa and Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 related to the statement of maladministration by the ORI? and What are the legal consequences for certificate holders due to the administrative maladministration? By using explanatory research methods. In this case the researcher gets the result that in the process of land registration the measurement process is not carried out which is one of the requirements to obtain physical data and there is no announcements must be made because to provide an opportunity to file an objection.

scholarly journals Akibat Hukum Ketentuan Pasal 33 Peraturan Menteri Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2018

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 220
Author(s):  
Bambang Tri Wahyudi ◽  
Rachmad Safa’at
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Spatial Planning ◽  
Income Tax ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Legal Force

This study aimed to analyze the legal force, legal conflicts, and legal consequences of the provisions of Article 33 of the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency Number 6 of 2018 and the formulation that was appropriate with the regulations of the payment procedures for income tax (PPh) and acquisition duty of right on land and building (BPHTB). This study used a normative juridical method with a conceptual and statute approach. Based on academic juridical perspective, article 33 Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency Number 6 of 2018 had weak legal force, while from a formal juridical perspective the regulation remained valid before a decision to cancel its application from the Supreme Court. The provisions of Article 33 of the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency Number 6 of 2018 contradicted the provisions of Articles 3 and 7 of Government Regulation Number 34 of 2018 and Articles 90 and 91 of Law Number 28 of 2009. It caused legal consequences i.e. legal uncertainty, legal injustice, and did not fulfill the legal force of land rights certificates as a strong means of proof. The formulation of the right regulation regarding the procedure for paying income tax and fees for acquiring land and building rights was carried out by establishing and stipulating a ministerial regulation as a normative guideline for a complete systematic land registration program.

scholarly journals STATUS HUKUM HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH YANG TERKENA ABRASI

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-107
Author(s):  
Dwi Susiati ◽  
Sri Setiadji
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Impact

Abrasion is a natural disaster that results in the owner of the right to land losing the right to control, use or take advantage of the land, because the land is lost in part or in whole due to erosion by water. Article 27 of the Law On Agraria determines that property rights over land are destroyed if the land is destroyed. In this study, the author will analyze the legal status of property of land affected by abrasion with the formulation of the problem What is the legal status of property rights on land affected by abrasion according to Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration and how to guarantee the protection of affected land rights abrasion. The results of this study are that the status of land rights affected by abrasion is abolished, both in the provisions of the Law On Agraria and Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration because it is no longer compatible with physical data or juridical data as a strong evidence. The government has an obligation to provide guarantees and protection of rights to land affected by abrasion and those that have been affected by abrasion in part or in whole. On the basis of the state's right to control Article 2 of the Law On Agraria the state has the right to regulate land use, inventory, and maintenance to prevent and reduce the impact of abrasion on its citizens. The government can also provide compensation as contained in Article Number 24 of 2007 concerning Disaster Management which determines that the Government and regional governments are responsible for the implementation of disaster management.Abrasi merupakan bencana alam yang mengakibatkan pemilik hak atas tanah kehilangan hak untuk menguasai, menggunakan, atau mengambil manfaat atas tanah, karena tanah tersebut hilang sebagian atau seluruhnya akibat pengikisan oleh air. Pasal 27 UUPA menentukan hak milik atas tanah hapus, apabila tanahnya musnah. Pada penelitian ini, penulis akan menganalisa tentang status hukum hak milik atas tanah yang terkena abrasi dengan rumusan masalah Bagaimana status hukum hak milik atas tanah yang terkena abrasi menurut PP No. 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah  dan bagaimana jaminan perlindungan hak-hak tanah yang terdampak abrasi. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa status hak atas tanah yang terkena abrasi adalah hapus, baik dalam ketentuan UUPA maupun PP No. 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah karena tidak sesuai lagi dengan data fisik maupun data yuridis sebagai alat bukti yang kuat. Pemerintah mempunyai kewajiban untuk memberikan jaminan dan perlindungan hak-hak atas tanah yang terdampak abrasi maupun yang sudah terkena abrasi baik sebagian maupun seluruh tanahnya. Atas dasar hak menguasai oleh negara Pasal 2 UUPA negara berhak mengatur peruntukan, penggunaan, persediaan,dan pemeliharaan tanah untuk mencegah dan mengurangi dampak abrasi bagi warga negaranya. Pemerintah juga dapat memberikan ganti kerugian sebagaimana yang ada di dalam UU No. 24 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanggulangan Bencana yang menentukan bahwa Pemerintah dan pemerintah daerah menjadi penanggung jawab dalam penyelenggaraan penang-gulangan bencana.

JUAL BELI TANAH YANG DILAKUKAN TANPA AKTA PPAT

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-107
Author(s):  
Cheri Bayuni Budjang
Keyword(s):  
Everyday Life ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Right ◽  
Laws And Regulations

Buying and selling is a way to transfer land rights according to the provisions in Article 37 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration which must include the deed of the Land Deed Making Official to register the right of land rights (behind the name) to the Land Office to create legal certainty and minimize the risks that occur in the future. However, in everyday life there is still a lot of buying and selling land that is not based on the laws and regulations that apply, namely only by using receipts and trust in each other. This is certainly very detrimental to both parties in the transfer of rights (behind the name), especially if the other party is not known to exist like the Case in Decision Number 42 / Pdt.G / 2010 / PN.Mtp

scholarly journals ANALISIS YURIDIS HAK EIGENDOM VERPONDING SEBAGAI JAMINAN KEBENDAAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-55
Author(s):  
Irman Widi Kurniawan ◽  
Etty Mulyati ◽  
Betty Rubiati
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Status Quo ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Proof Of Ownership ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Legal Force

ABSTRAKDi dalam bagian kedua UUPA mengatur tentang pelaksanaan konversi hak atas tanah menjadi wujud kepastian hukum sebagaimana ketentuan Pasal 33 ayat (3) UUD 1945. Namun kepastian hukum terhadap konversi Hak atas tanah barat terutama sertifikat Hak Eigendom Verponding masih menjadi problematika tersendiri bagi masyarakat yang memiliki bukti kepemilikan hak atas tanah barat tersebut apabila dijadikan sebuah jaminan guna memperoleh fasilitas kredit. Metode penelitian yang digunakan ialah yuridis normatif dengan kajian bahan hukum primer, sekunder serta tersier. Berdasarkan pembahasan tersebut bahwa Kepastian Hukum terkait konversi hak Eigendom Verponding telah memiliki kekuatan hukum mengikat dengan ketentuan diperlukan konversi sehingga dapat dijadikan objek jaminan namun dalam prakteknya masih terdapat objek jaminan dengan tidak memperhatikan asal mula objek jaminan tersebut serta akibat hukum terhadap konversi hak atas tanah tersebut adalah pemberlakuan UUPA menjadi dasar bahwasanya prinsip status quo hak atas tanah terdahulu memberikan jaminan kepastian hukum dengan ketentuan hak-hak lama menjadi tidak diakui keberadaannya. Kata Kunci: hak atas tanah; hak barat; kepastian hukum jaminan; konversi ABSTRACTIn the second section of the UUPA regulates the conversion of land rights into a form of legal certainty as stipulated in Article 33 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution. But the legal certainty of the conversion of the Right to western land, especially the Eigendom Verponding Rights certificate, remains a problem for people who have proof of ownership of the western land if it is used as a guarantee to obtain credit facilities. The research method used is normative juridical with the study of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Based on the discussion that legal certainty related to the conversion of rights Eigendom Verponding has had a binding legal force with the necessary provisions of conversion so that it can be used as an object of guarantee but in practice there is still an object of guarantee by not taking into account the origin of the object of the guarantee and the legal consequences of the conversion of the right to land is the enactment of the UUPA being the basis that the principle of the status quo of the former land rights provides a guarantee of legal certainty with the provisions of old rights to be unclaimed civility. Keywords: conversion; guarantee legal certainty; land rights; western rights

scholarly journals The Strength of Evidence (Certificate) in Land Rights Disputes According to Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 Concerning Land Registration

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriella Talenta Sekotibo
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Strength Of Evidence ◽  
Legal Standing ◽  
Legal Consequences

The purpose of this study is to provide legal certainty and to resolve disputes over land rights ownership for buyers who are acting in good faith when purchasing and selling inheritance. The research method is normative juridical, employing both a statutory and case-based approach. According to the study's findings, buyers with good intentions receive legal protection in the form of compensation. However, when parties with bad intentions violate Article 1267 of the Civil Code, the legal consequences of buying and selling inherited land are null and void, as they contain elements of fraud, oversight, and ignorance. additional heirs. Keeping in mind that the property being traded is inheritance land that already possesses permanent legal standing and cannot be traded without the approval of other heirs.Keywords: Legal Protection; Good Faith Buyers; and Inheritance Land.

scholarly journals LAND REGISTRATION OF PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THE REVIEW OF THE ECONOMICS VALUE

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elviana Sagala ◽  
Ade Parlaungan Nasution ◽  
Risdalina
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Economic Value ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Legal Subject ◽  
The Public ◽  
Proof Of Ownership ◽  
Village Government ◽  
The Many ◽  
The Village

The importance of registration of land rights for every person or legal subject to proof of ownership certificate of property rights for economic value will be on the increase in value and simplify every business economy to obtain their capital and to increase its business, because the registered land can be used as collateral to obtain venture capital in the Bank or other financing that is set in the legislation.And ignorance of the importance of registration of land rights on the property of factors primarily the many people who do not understand the importance of registration of land rights, and the lack of socialization Government to the public or the cooperation of village government and village by Lecturer of Law and Lecturer in Economic Law by asking lecturers in the area The conduct of devotion in the village and his village.

scholarly journals Cancellation of Land Ownership Certificate by the State Administrative Court Reviewed from the State Administrative Justice Law

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 703
Author(s):  
Nurul Muzakkir ◽  
Yanis Rinaldi ◽  
Adwani Adwani
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
The State ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Land Area ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Legal Problems ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Right

Based on Article 32 paragraph (2) of Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration states, in the event that a land area has been issued a certificate legally and on behalf of a person or legal entity who acquires the land in good faith and expressly controls it, then the other party who feels that it has the right to the land, can no longer demand the exercise of the right if within a period of 5 years from the issuance of the certificate does not object in writing to the holder of the certificate or the Head of the Land Office concerned or does not file a lawsuit to the Court regarding the mastery or issuance of the certificate. Legal problems arise that a certificate that has been issued a certificate for 5 years can not be sued in court on an validity basis. The results showed that the cancellation of land rights certificate by tun court based on The State Administrative Court Law, cancellation of land certificates by deliberation and other efforts and unilateral settlement by the National Land Agency (BPN) has been carried out, where the plaintiffs held a review of the State Administrative Decision that has been issued can not be received by the plaintiff or the disputing party. Prior to the ruling that has legal force it remains prohibited for the relevant State Administration officials to carry out mutations on the land in question, it is to avoid the occurrence of problems in the future that cause harm to the litigants and third parties.

scholarly journals The Contradiction of Between Judge’s Decision and Legal Provisions Regarding The Position of Heirs in Proof of Land Rights

2019 ◽  
pp. 133-148
Author(s):  
Sulistiani Adont ◽  
La Syarifuddin ◽  
Rahmawati Al Hidayah
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Valid Evidence ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

As the economic development of Indonesian society increases, so will the need for legal certainty in the field of land for the right holder of a plot of land. the fundamental issue in verifying the right to the land is any person claiming to have a right, or appointing an event to affirm his right or to deny any right of another person, shall prove the existence of that right or prove the event, the heirs' a case study of the Samarinda District Court Judgment Number 138 / Pdt.G / 2014 / PN.Smr.This research uses normative research method. The primary legal material of this research is the legislation that is compiled into a conceptual form based on existing legislation. Which then conducted legal analysis of the problems in this study.The result of the research is the position of the heirs in verification of the right to land must have at least two evidences, that can prove that the heirs are valid first through the certificate of inheritance. To strengthen the verification of the heirs to the land rights, the heirs must prove by means of evidence as set forth in Article 24 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Registration. The second result of the research is the letter of appointment by the Government/Local Government is a valid evidence based on existing legislation, and it becomes the base of the right which is the basis of the land ownership, the analysis of the judge's decision namely the judge decision of Samarinda District Court No. 138 / Pdt.G / 2014 / PN.Smr is incorrect and does not provide legal certainty, it is caused by no reference what is contained in Article 24 paragraph (1) and Article 32 paragraph (2) Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 on Land Registration.

scholarly journals PENGARUH SERTIFIKAT HAK ATAS TANAH SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI DALAM MENCAPAI KEPASTIAN HUKUM

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-43
Author(s):  
Abdul Muthallib
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
Role Of The Government

This article discusses legal certainty as one of the objectives of Law No. 5 of 1960 concerning Agrarian (Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Pokok-Pokok Agraria) Principles and the influence of land rights certificates as a strong means of proof of land registration. The provision of guarantees of legal certainty to holders of land rights is accommodated in Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Agrarian Principles and further regulated in Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration (Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah). Using a normative legal view, this article refers to regulations on agrarian. The discussion of the article looks at the role of the government in providing opportunities for all citizens to register land with the aim of obtaining legal certainty and minimizing disputes. This article looks at the purpose of issuing certificates in land registration activities so that right-holders can easily prove that they are the right-holders. This is done so that rights holders can obtain legal certainty and legal protection. However, the land rights certificate issued is considered to be still lacking in minimizing disputes and it is assumed that it has not affected the land rights owners to protect their rights.

scholarly journals JAMINAN KEPASTIAN HUKUM YANG TERKANDUNG DALAM SERTIPIKAT HAK ATAS TANAH

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahmat Ramadhani
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Registration Process ◽  
Physical Data ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Subjects

The product of the land registration process is a certificate of title granted to the right holder. The certificate according to Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 is in the form of one sheet of documents containing information about the juridical data and physical data required on a parcel of registered land. Although the certificate of land rights is referred to as the strongest evidence but in reality the certificate of land rights has not fully guaranteed legal certainty. This is because the law still opens loopholes for other legal subjects to question it both personally and in groups within the judiciary. In order to ensure legal certainty of a right to land for the right holder, the certificate of land rights must be tested in three aspects: relating to; Legal Certainty of Object, Legal Certainty of Status of Rights and Legal Certainty on Subject.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document