scholarly journals Prospective comparative study of intraoperative balloon electronic brachytherapy versus resection with multidisciplinary adjuvant therapy for recurrent glioblastoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 517
Author(s):  
Aleksey Krivoshapkin ◽  
Aleksey Gaytan ◽  
Orkhan Abdullaev ◽  
Nidal Salim ◽  
Gleb Sergeev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Electronic Brachytherapy ◽  
Local Progression ◽  
Second Resection ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study

Background: Intraoperative balloon electronic brachytherapy (IBEB) may provide potential benefit for local control of recurrent cerebral glioblastomas (GBMs). Methods: This is a preliminary report of an open-label, prospective, comparative cohort study conducted in two neurosurgical centers with ongoing follow-up. At recurrence, patients at one center (n = 15) underwent reresection with IBEB while, at the second center (n = 15), control subjects underwent re-resection with various accepted second-line adjuvant chemoradiotherapy options. A comparative analysis of overall survival (OS) and local progression-free survival (LPFS) following re-resection was performed. Exploratory subgroup analysis based on postoperative residual contrast-enhanced volume status was also done. Results: In the IBEB group, median LPFS after re-resection was significantly longer than in the control group (8.0 vs. 6.0 months; log rank χ2 = 4.93, P = 0.026, P < 0.05). In addition, the median OS after second resection in the IBEB group was also significantly longer than in the control group (11.0 vs. 8.0 months; log rank χ2 = 4.23, P = 0.04, P < 0.05). Conclusion: These hypothesis-generating results from a small cohort of subjects suggest putative clinical benefit in OS and LPFS associated with maximal safe re-resection of recurrent GBM with IBEB versus re-resection and standard adjuvant therapy, a hypothesis that deserves further testing in an appropriately powered clinical trial.

CTIM-14. RANDOMIZED PHASE II OPEN LABEL STUDY OF NIVOLUMAB PLUS STANDARD DOSE BEVACIZUMAB VS NIVOLUMAB PLUS LOW DOSE BEVACIZUMAB IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA (RGBM). NIVOLUMAB BENEFITS OLDER POPULATION

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi52-vi52
Author(s):  
Manmeet Ahluwalia ◽  
David Peereboom ◽  
Yasmeen Rauf ◽  
Patrick Wen ◽  
David Reardon
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Dose Effect ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Anti Vegf

Abstract BACKGROUND Approaches using anti-PD1 therapy alone in rGBM is of limited efficacy. VEGF is upregulated proangiogenic growth factor in GBM that contributes to tumor-associated immunosuppression. Preclinical data suggests a potential dose effect of anti-VEGF therapy on immunomodulation. Hence, a combination of anti-PD1 and anti-VEGF may be a promising approach in rGBM. METHODS 90 patients with GBM at first recurrence were randomized (1:1) to nivolumab (240 mg IV Q2 weeks) with bevacizumab at standard (10 mg/kg; Arm A) or at low dose (3 mg/kg; Arm B) IV Q2 weeks. Stratification included extent of resection, age, performance status and MGMT methylation status. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between two arms. RESULTS 90 patients (Median age 60.6 years ranged 27.4-86.4, 67.8% male, median KPS 80) were enrolled between May 2018 and Jan 2020. Patients were followed in median 7.7 months (Range 0.7, 28.2). 35 patients were MGMT methylated and 53 patients were MGMT not hypermethylated and 2 were indeterminate. Overall Survival was not significantly different between arm A and arm B (1 year: 41.1 vs 37.7%, p=0.14), while OS was better for arm A in age &gt; 60 (At 1-year: 46.2% vs 23.8%; Median: 10.6 vs 5.9 months; P=0.046). OS was no different in the two arms for age ≤ 60 years (At 1-year: 35.6% vs 56.4; Median 8.0 vs 12.4 months; P=0.90). Most frequent toxicities ( &gt;20%) included fatigue (45.6%), proteinuria (34.4 %), diarrhea (28.9%), hypertension (23.3%) and lipase increase (21.1%). Toxicities in grade 3-4 were hypertension (7.8%), fatigue (5.6) and other non-neurological toxicities including DVT, PE, infection, and abnormal liver function. CONCLUSIONS Overall PFS and OS rates appear similar for nivolumab with either standard or low-dose bevacizumab compared to historical benchmarks of bevacizumab monotherapy. Nivolumab with standard bevacizumab seem to benefit patients older than 60 years old.

scholarly journals Axitinib plus avelumab in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma: a stratified, open-label, single-center phase 2 clinical trial (GliAvAx)

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e001146
Author(s):  
Gil Awada ◽  
Laila Ben Salama ◽  
Jennifer De Cremer ◽  
Julia Katharina Schwarze ◽  
Lydia Fischbuch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Synergistic Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Corticosteroid Dose

BackgroundNo treatment demonstrated to improve survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGB) in a randomized trial. Combining axitinib with the programmed cell death ligand 1 blocking monoclonal antibody avelumab may result in synergistic activity against rGB.MethodsAdult patients with rGB following prior surgery, radiation therapy and temozolomide chemotherapy were stratified according to their baseline use of corticosteroids. Patients with a daily dose of ≤8 mg of methylprednisolone (or equivalent) initiated treatment with axitinib (5 mg oral two times per day) plus avelumab (10 mg/kg intravenous every 2 weeks) (Cohort-1). Patients with a higher baseline corticosteroid dose initiated axitinib monotherapy; avelumab was added after 6 weeks of therapy if the corticosteroid dose could be tapered to ≤8 mg of methylprednisolone (Cohort-2). Progression-free survival at 6 months (6-m-PFS%), per immunotherapy response assessment for neuro-oncology criteria, served as the primary endpoint.ResultsBetween June 2017 and August 2018, 54 patients (27 per cohort) were enrolled and initiated study treatment (median age: 55 years; 63% male; 91% Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0–1). Seventeen (63%) patients treated in Cohort-2 received at least one dose of avelumab. The 6-m-PFS% was 22.2% (95% CI 6.5% to 37.9%) and 18.5% (95% CI 3.8% to 33.2%) in Cohort-1 and Cohort-2, respectively; median overall survival was 26.6 weeks (95% CI 20.8 to 32.4) in Cohort-1 and 18.0 weeks (95% CI 12.5 to 23.5) in Cohort-2. The best objective response rate was 33.3% and 22.2% in Cohort-1 and Cohort-2, respectively, with a median duration of response of 17.9 and 19.0 weeks. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were dysphonia (67%), lymphopenia (50%), arterial hypertension and diarrhea (both 48%). There were no grade 5 adverse events.ConclusionThe combination of avelumab plus axitinib has an acceptable toxicity profile but did not meet the prespecified threshold for activity justifying further investigation of this treatment in an unselected population of patients with rGB.

Phase II study of ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide (ICE) in recurrent glioblastoma

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2066-2066
Author(s):  
T. Aoki ◽  
K. Nojima ◽  
T. Mizutani ◽  
M. Ishikawa ◽  
A. Takasu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

2066 Background: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide ( ICE ) in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Methods: This was an open-label, single-center phase II trial. Forty-two patients with first recurrent glioblastoma after surgery, standard radiotherapy and a first-line temozolomide-based or ACNU-based chemotherapy, were enrolled.The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 6 months ( PFS-6 ), and secondary endpoints were response rate, toxicity, and survival. Chemotherapy consisted of Ifosfamide ( 700 mg / m2 on day 1, 2 and 3 ), carbopaltin ( 100 mg / m2 on day 1 ), etoposide ( 70 mg / m2 on day 1, 2, and 3 ), every 6 weeks. Results: PFS-6 was 37 %. The median PFS was 17 weeks. Response rate was 27 %. Adverse events were generally mild ( grade 1 or 2 ) and consisted mainly of alopecia. Conclusions: This regimen is well tolerated and has activity in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Disulfiram repurposing combined with nutritional copper supplement as add-on to chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma (DIRECT): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

F1000Research ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 1797 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asgeir Store Jakola ◽  
Katja Werlenius ◽  
Munila Mudaisi ◽  
Sofia Hylin ◽  
Sara Kinhult ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Anticancer Agent ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Methylguanine Methyltransferase

Background: Disulfiram (DSF) is a well-tolerated, inexpensive, generic drug that has been in use to treat alcoholism since the 1950s. There is now independent preclinical data that supports DSF as an anticancer agent, and experimental data suggest that copper may increase its anti-neoplastic properties. There is also some clinical evidence that DSF is a promising anticancer agent in extracranial cancers. In glioblastoma, DSF induced O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) inhibition may increase response to alkylating chemotherapy. A recent phase I study demonstrated the safety of DSF in glioblastoma patients when DSF was administered at doses below 500 mg/day together with chemotherapy. We plan to assess the effects of DSF combined with nutritional copper supplement (DSF-Cu) as an adjuvant to alkylating chemotherapy in glioblastoma treatment. Methods: In an academic, industry independent, multicenter, open label randomized controlled phase II/III trial with parallel group design (1:1) we will assess the efficacy and safety of DSF-Cu in glioblastoma treatment. The study will include 142 patients at the time of first recurrence of glioblastoma where salvage therapy with alkylating chemotherapy is planned. Patients will be randomized to treatment with or without DSF-Cu. Primary end-point is survival at 6 months. Secondary end-points are overall survival, progression free survival, quality of life, contrast enhancing tumor volume and safety. Discussion: There is a need to improve the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. Results from this randomized controlled trial with DSF-Cu in glioblastoma will serve as preliminary evidence of the future role of DSF-Cu in glioblastoma treatment and a basis for design and power estimations of future studies. In this publication we provide rationale for our choices and discuss methodological issues. Trial registration: The study underwent registration in EudraCT 2016-000167-16 (Date: 30.03.2016,) and Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02678975 (Date: 31.01.2016) before initiating the study.

scholarly journals Window-of-opportunity clinical trial of pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma reveals predominance of immune-suppressive macrophages

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 539-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
John de Groot ◽  
Marta Penas-Prado ◽  
Kristin Alfaro-Munoz ◽  
Kathy Hunter ◽  
Be Lian Pei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Tumor Microenvironment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Therapeutic Window ◽  
Window Of Opportunity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Activation Markers ◽  
Immune Effector ◽  
Immune Effector Function

Abstract Background We sought to ascertain the immune effector function of pembrolizumab within the glioblastoma (GBM) microenvironment during the therapeutic window. Methods In an open-label, single-center, single-arm phase II “window-of-opportunity” trial in 15 patients with recurrent (operable) GBM receiving up to 2 pembrolizumab doses before surgery and every 3 weeks afterward until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities occurred, immune responses were evaluated within the tumor. Results No treatment-related deaths occurred. Overall median follow-up time was 50 months. Of 14 patients monitored, 10 had progressive disease, 3 had a partial response, and 1 had stable disease. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.5 months (95% CI: 2.27, 6.83), and the 6-month PFS rate was 40%. Median overall survival (OS) was 20 months, with an estimated 1-year OS rate of 63%. GBM patients’ recurrent tumors contained few T cells that demonstrated a paucity of immune activation markers, but the tumor microenvironment was markedly enriched for CD68+ macrophages. Conclusions Immune analyses indicated that pembrolizumab anti–programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) monotherapy alone can’t induce effector immunologic response in most GBM patients, probably owing to a scarcity of T cells within the tumor microenvironment and a CD68+ macrophage preponderance.

scholarly journals PL3.5 Efficacy and safety of selinexor in recurrent glioblastoma

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii3-iii4 ◽  
Author(s):  
A B Lassman ◽  
P Y Wen ◽  
M van den Bent ◽  
S R Plotkin ◽  
A Walenkamp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Partial Responder

Abstract BACKGROUND New treatment modalities are needed for recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM). Selinexor is a novel, oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export which forces nuclear retention of tumor suppressor proteins including p53 and p27, leading to apoptosis. We previously reported interim results showing tolerability, preliminary efficacy, and blood-brain barrier penetration in a surgical cohort (N=8). We now report updated results following completion of accrual to non-surgical cohorts (N=68). MATERIALS AND METHODS This is an open-label, multicenter, phase 2 study of selinexor monotherapy. Patients (pts) not undergoing surgery for measurable rGBM per response assessment neuro-oncology criteria (RANO) were enrolled in one of 3 arms encompassing different dosing schedules of selinexor (50 mg/m2 [~ 85 mg] BIW, 60 mg BIW, and 80 mg QW). Treatment was continuous, although cycles were defined as 28 days and response was assessed every other cycle by MRI. Prior treatment with radiotherapy and temozolomide was required and prior bevacizumab was exclusionary. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression free survival (6mPFS) rate, calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS 76 pts were enrolled; 24, 14 and 30 pts on doses of ~85 mg BIW, 60 mg BIW, and 80 mg QW, respectively. Median age was 56 years (range 21–78). Median number of prior treatments was 2 (range 1–7) At the end of the 6 cycles, 30.2% pts on 80 mg QW were free from progression. The 6mPFS rate on 80 mg QW was 18.9%. Best RANO-defined responses (assessed locally) among 26 evaluable pts on 80 mg QW included 1 complete response, 2 partial responses, 7 stable disease, and 16 with progressive disease. Complete and partial responses were durable: the complete and a partial responder remain on selinexor for 393 and 1093 days respectively, as of the cut-off date. Median duration of response was 10.8 months. The most common related adverse events (all grades) in pts on ~85 mg BIW/60 mg BIW/80 mg QW were nausea (42%/64%/63%), leukopenia (38%/7%/43%), fatigue (71%/71%/47%), neutropenia (29%/14%/33%), decreased appetite (46%/71%/27%), and thrombocytopenia (67%/29%/23%). CONCLUSION Selinexor demonstrated efficacy, with durable responses and disease stabilization in rGBM. Based on the favorable efficacy and safety profile, selinexor at a dose of 80 mg QW is recommended for further development in rGBM.

Bevacizumab Alone and in Combination With Irinotecan in Recurrent Glioblastoma

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (28) ◽  
pp. 4733-4740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry S. Friedman ◽  
Michael D. Prados ◽  
Patrick Y. Wen ◽  
Tom Mikkelsen ◽  
David Schiff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Noncomparative Trial ◽  
End Points ◽  
Free Survival

Purpose We evaluated the efficacy of bevacizumab, alone and in combination with irinotecan, in patients with recurrent glioblastoma in a phase II, multicenter, open-label, noncomparative trial. Patients and Methods One hundred sixty-seven patients were randomly assigned to receive bevacizumab 10 mg/kg alone or in combination with irinotecan 340 mg/m2 or 125 mg/m2 (with or without concomitant enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs, respectively) once every 2 weeks. Primary end points were 6-month progression-free survival and objective response rate, as determined by independent radiology review. Secondary end points included safety and overall survival. Results In the bevacizumab-alone and the bevacizumab-plus-irinotecan groups, estimated 6-month progression-free survival rates were 42.6% and 50.3%, respectively; objective response rates were 28.2% and 37.8%, respectively; and median overall survival times were 9.2 months and 8.7 months, respectively. There was a trend for patients who were taking corticosteroids at baseline to take stable or decreasing doses over time. Of the patients treated with bevacizumab alone or bevacizumab plus irinotecan, 46.4% and 65.8%, respectively, experienced grade ≥ 3 adverse events, the most common of which were hypertension (8.3%) and convulsion (6.0%) in the bevacizumab-alone group and convulsion (13.9%), neutropenia (8.9%), and fatigue (8.9%) in the bevacizumab-plus-irinotecan group. Intracranial hemorrhage was noted in two patients (2.4%) in the bevacizumab-alone group (grade 1) and in three patients (3.8%) patients in the bevacizumab-plus-irinotecan group (grades 1, 2, and 4, respectively). Conclusion Bevacizumab, alone or in combination with irinotecan, was well tolerated and active in recurrent glioblastoma.

scholarly journals Efficacy of neoadjuvant hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer (the NHIPEC trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. e046415
Author(s):  
Miao-Fang Wu ◽  
Li-Juan Wang ◽  
Yan-Fang Ye ◽  
Chang-Hao Liu ◽  
Huai-Wu Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Chemotherapy Response ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Surgical Morbidity ◽  
Experimental Group

BackgroundNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is an important treatment option for patients with ovarian cancer. Although intravenous NACT can improve optimal resection rates and decrease surgical morbidity and mortality, these advantages do not translate into a survival benefit. Ovarian carcinoma is mainly confined to the peritoneal cavity, which makes it a potential target for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Our previous study showed that HIPEC could be used in the neoadjuvant setting, which was named neoadjuvant HIPEC (NHIPEC). Since hyperthermia is an excellent chemosensitiser, we hypothesised that the combination of NHIPEC and intravenous NACT could show superior efficacy to intravenous NACT alone.MethodsThis study is a single-centre, open-label, randomised (1:1 allocation ratio) phase 2 trial. A total of 80 patients will be randomly assigned into an experimental group (NHIPEC+intravenous NACT) or a control group (intravenous NACT). Patients in the experimental group will receive NHIPEC following laparoscopic evaluation, and four tubes will be placed via the laparoscopic ports, which will be used to administer NHIPEC. Then, perfusion with docetaxel (60–75 mg/m2) will be performed (43°C for 60 min, Day 0) followed by cisplatin (75 mg/m2, Day 1) infusion (43°C for 60 min) 24 hours later. After NHIPEC, two cycles of intravenous NACT will be given. Patients in the control group will receive three cycles of intravenous NACT. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients who achieve a Chemotherapy Response Score (CRS) of 3 according to the CRS system. The secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, overall survival and the rates of complete resection and NHIPEC-related adverse events.Ethics approval and disseminationThis study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital (approval number: 2020-ky-050). Results will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences.Trial registration numberChiCTR2000038173.

scholarly journals Bintrafusp alfa (M7824) a bifunctional fusion protein targeting TGF-β and PD-L1: results from a phase 1 expansion cohort in patients with recurrent glioblastoma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Khasraw ◽  
Michael Weller ◽  
David Lorente ◽  
Kathryn Kolibaba ◽  
Chee Khoon Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fusion Protein ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Bifunctional Fusion Protein ◽  
Expansion Cohort

Abstract Background For patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM), there are few options following treatment failure with radiotherapy plus temozolomide. Bintrafusp alfa is a first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of the TGF-βRII receptor (a TGF-β “trap”) fused to a human IgG1 antibody blocking PD-L1. Methods In this phase 1, open-label expansion cohort, (NCT02517398), patients with rGBM that progressed after radiotherapy plus temozolomide received bintrafusp alfa 1200 mg Q2W until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or trial withdrawal. Response was assessed per RANO criteria. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR); secondary endpoints included safety. Results As of August 24, 2018, 35 patients received bintrafusp alfa for a median of 1.8 (range, 0.5-20.7) months. Eight patients (22.9%) experienced disease control as assessed by an independent review committee: 2 had a partial response, 4 had stable disease, and 2 had non–complete response /non–progressive disease. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.4 (95% CI, 1.2-1.6) months; 6- and 12-month PFS rates were 15.1% and 11.3%, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 5.3 (95% CI, 2.6-9.4) months; 6- and 12-month OS rates were 44.5% and 30.8%, respectively. The DCR (95% CI) was 66.7% (22.3-95.7%) for patients with IDH-mutant GBM (n=6) and 13.8% (3.9-31.7%) for patients with IDH–wild-type GBM (n=29). Disease control was seen regardless of PD-L1 expression. Twenty-five patients (71.4%) experienced treatment-related adverse events (grade ≥3; 17.1% [n=6]). Conclusions The percentage of patients achieving disease control and the manageable safety profile may warrant further investigation of bintrafusp alfa in GBM.

Safety and efficacy study of retifanlimab and epacadostat in combination with radiation and bevacizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS2070-TPS2070
Author(s):  
Jian Li Campian ◽  
Christopher Abraham ◽  
Jingqin Luo ◽  
Grayson Talcott ◽  
Ruth Katumba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Safety And Efficacy

TPS2070 Background: Recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) after chemoradiotherapy has a dismal outcome with very limited treatment options. Addition of reirradiation to bevacizumab appears to improve progression-free survival (PFS) but does not improve overall survival (OS). Immune checkpoint inhibitors of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) pathway appear to have limited single-agent activity for rGBM due to its immunesuppressive microenvironment. Indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) is an inducible and rate-limiting enzyme that catabolizes tryptophan (Trp) into kynurenine (Kyn). IDO1 is over-expressed in 50̃90% of GBM patients, and high IDO1 levels correlate with reduced OS. Epacadostat is a highly potent and selective oral inhibitor of IDO1 and may increase tumor sensitivity to anti-PD-1 blockade. Retifanlimab is a humanized anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody directed against PD-1. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining retifanlimab plus or minus epacadostat with reirradiation and bevacizumab for rGBM patients. Methods: This is an open-label nonrandomized phase II study of two sequential cohorts for bevacizumab-naïve adults with rGBM: retifanlimab + bevacizumab+ radiation (cohort A), and retifanlimab + epacadostat + bevacizumab + radiation (cohort B). Each cohort will enroll 24 evaluable patients. Key eligibility criteria include candidates for reirradiation and bevacizumab, age ≥ 18 years, Karnofsky performance status ≥ 60%, and dexamethasone dose ≤ 4 mg/day. The primary endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include PFS, neurologic functions, and toxicity. The correlative endpoints include studies assess the anti-glioma immune response, serum Kyn/Trp ratio, and RNA expression of IDO1 and PD-L1 from available tissue. The trial is actively enrolling. At the time of abstract submission, 16 of the planned 24 patients in Cohort A have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT03532295. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document