scholarly journals ANALISIS PENILAIAN TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN METODE RISK PROFILE, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNINGS, CAPITAL

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 138
Author(s):  
Santi Octaviani ◽  
Nadya Saraswati
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Good Corporate Governance

Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Bank Aceh Setelah Konversi Periode 2016-2018 Berdasarkan Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 8/POJK.03/2014

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Hanifa Assofia
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Bank Capital ◽  
Collection Method ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive

<p>This research aims to find out how Bank Aceh's financial performance after conversion in terms of earnings and capital. The type of research used is quantitative descriptive research. The data collection method used is the documentation method based on the data in the form of quarterly financial statements for the 2016-2018 period published. The method of data analysis in this study is by using the RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning and Capital). The results of the study show that Bank Aceh's financial performance in terms of profitability ranks 2, with the definition that profitability is adequate, profit exceeds the target and supports the growth of bank capital. Bank Aceh's decision to convert to sharia as a whole was a very appropriate decision because it was able to show good performance, besides that it also supported the Aceh Government in carrying out its programs to enforce Islamic law. Bank Aceh's financial performance in terms of capital also ranks 2, with the definition that banks have adequate capital quality and adequacy relative to their risk profile, which is accompanied by strong capital management in accordance with the characteristics, scale of business and the complexity of the bank's business.</p>

TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN PENDEKATAN METODE RGEC PADA BANK PEMBANGUNAN DAERAH DIY

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 117
Author(s):  
Edy Anan ◽  
Roni Albarqis
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Commercial Bank ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Circular Letter ◽  
Profitability Assessment ◽  
Bank Soundness

ABSTRACTThis study is aimed to determine the soundness of commercial bank at PT. Bank Pembangunan Daerah DIY during the years 2011 until 2015 based on RGEC method that consisted of risk profile, good corporate governance, earnings and capital. The method that used to collect data isnonparticipant observation by documenting. Descriptive analysis technique based on the Bank Indonesia Circular Letter No. 13/24/DPNP about Assessment of Commercial Bank Soundness. The results show that the soundness level of Bank Pembangunan Daerah DIY in 2011 until 2015 wasproved. NPL and LDR that measured Risk Profile factor prove a well executed risk management. Good Corporate Governance factor shows BPD DIY has applied corporate governance well. Earnings factor or profitability assessment consist of ROA and NIM has increased and this sign of theincreasing of total assets owned by BPD DIY that followed by increasing of profit gained by BPD DIY. Using the CAR indicator, the author proved that BPD DIY has good Capital factor, which is above Bank Indonesia provision that 8%. Conclution of the result showed that soundness level ofBank Pembangunan Daerah DIY in 2011 until 2015 overall was in the first place of composite ranked with a very healthy predicate and the total of composite score for each year is 93%, 93% , 97%, 97% and 97%.ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tingkat kesehatan bank pada PT. Bank Pembangunan Daerah DIY selama tahun 2011 hingga 2015 berdasarkan metode RGEC yang terdiri dari risk profile, good corporate governance, earnings dan capital. Metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah observasi nonpartisipan dengan cara dokumentasi. Teknik analisis deskriptif dengan berpedoman pada Surat Edaran Bank Indonesia No. 13/24/DPNP tentang Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa tingkat kesehatan BPD DIY pada tahun 2011 sampai dengan 2015 secara keseluruhan dapat dikatakan bank yang sehat. Faktor Risk Profile yang dinilai melalui NPL dan LDR secara keseluruhan menggambarkan pengelolaan risiko yangtelah dilaksanakan dengan baik. Faktor Good Corporate Governance, BPD DIY sudah menerapkan tata kelola perusahaan dengan baik. Faktor Earnings atau rentabilitas yang penilaiannya terdiri dari ROA dan NIM mengalami kenaikan dan hal ini menandakan bertambahnya jumlah aset yang dimiliki BPD DIY diikuti dengan bertambahnya keuntungan yang didapat oleh BPD DIY. Dengan menggunakan indikator CAR, peneliti membuktikan bahwa BPD DIY memiliki faktor Capital yang baik, yaitu diatas ketentuan Bank Indonesia sebesar 8%. Kesimpulan hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa PT. Bank Pembangunan Daerah DIY pada tahun 2011 hingga 2015 secara keseluruhan berada pada peringkat komposit satu dengan predikat sangat sehat serta masing-masing total nilai komposit sebesar 93%, 93%, 97% , 97% dan 97%

scholarly journals MENILAI TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN ANALISIS METODE RISK PROFILE, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNINGS, CAPITAL PADA BANK SYARIAH DI INDONESIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-160
Author(s):  
Hendra Galuh Febrianto ◽  
Amalia Indah Fitriana
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Optimal Level ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Business Strategies ◽  
Islamic Banking ◽  
Risk Profiles ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Financial Research ◽  
Bank Soundness

ABSTRACT In the banking world of soundness, banks are very important for the formation of trust. Trust and loyalty to banks is a very helpful factor and makes it easier for bank management to develop good business strategies. Bank Soundness Levels are results issued by banks which are carried out on bank risk and performance (Bank Indonesia Regulation Number: 13/1 / PBI / 2011). If more than conventional banking with Islamic banking, conventional banking finance is better than Islamic banking. This is blessed with poor sharia banking (corporate governance) management. In order to be able to carry out its functions properly, banks must have sufficient capital, ensure the quality of their assets properly, be well managed and managed based on the principle of prudence, generate sufficient profits to maintain an increase, and support liquidity so that it can be adjusted to their needs. Therefore banks are required to be able to achieve and maintain a good and optimal level of performance, because the level of bank performance can increase the level of trust and loyalty needed by the wider community to use the products, services and financial activities of the bank. The purpose of this study is for advanced financial research with analysis of Risk Profiles (Risk Profiles), Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Profitability (Income), and Capital (Capital) which is hereinafter abbreviated as RGEC with the final aim of research for the needs of Sharia banking management in accordance with the latest Bank Indonesia and OJK regulations. This type of research uses descriptive research proposed in the RGEC analysis (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Income, and Capital) at Islamic Banks in Indonesia. from 2013 to 2017. Keywords: Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Income, Capital, Bank Soundness   ABSTRAK Dalam dunia perbankan tingkat kesehatan bank sangat penting bagi pembentukan kepercayaan. Kepercayaan dan loyalitas nasabah terhadap bank merupakan faktor yang sangat membantu dan mempermudah pihak manajemen bank untuk menyusun strategi bisnis yang baik. Tingkat Kesehatan Bank adalah hasil penilaian kondisi bank yang dilakukan terhadap risiko dan kinerja bank (Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor: 13/1/PBI/2011). Jika dibanding antara perbankan konvensional dengan perbankan syariah, kinerja keuangan perbankan konvensional lebih baik daripada perbankan syariah. Hal ini dikarena tatakelola (good corporate governance) perbankan syariah yang masih buruk. Agar dapat menjalankan fungsinya dengan baik, bank harus mempunyai modal yang cukup, menjaga kualitas asetnya dengan baik, dikelola dengan baik dan dioperasikan berdasarkan prinsip kehati-hatian, menghasilkan keuntungan yang cukup untuk mempertahankan kelangsungan usahanya, serta memelihara likuiditasnya sehingga dapat memenuhi kewajibannya. Oleh karena itu bank dituntut untuk bisa mencapai dan mempertahankan tingkat kinerja yang baik dan optimal, karena tingkat kinerja bank yang baik dapat meningkatkan kepercayaan dan loyalitas nasabah maupun masyarakat luas untuk menggunakan produk, jasa dan aktivitas keuangan dari bank tersebut. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menilai tingkat kesehatan keuangan dengan analisis Profil Risiko (Risk Profile), Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Rentabilitas (Earnings), dan Permodalan (Capital) yang selanjutnya disingkat RGEC dengan tujuan akhir merekomendasikan kebijakan untuk memperbaiki manajemen perbankan Syariah yang sesuai peraturan Bank Indonesia dan OJK yang terbaru. Jenis penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian deskriptif yang berfokus pada analisis RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital) pada Bank Syariah di Indonesia. dari tahun 2013 sampai 2017. Kata kunci: Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital, Tingkat Kesehatan Bank

scholarly journals Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Mandiri Syariah Dengan Metode Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governace, Earnings and Capital

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 724
Author(s):  
Anik Anik ◽  
Suhesti Ningsih
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Quantitative Methods ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Production Factors ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive ◽  
Health Rating

The purpose of this research is to see the soundness level of Bank Syariah Mandiri with the method of Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings and Capital. The research method uses quantitative methods. Production factors in the RGEC method are the risk profile using credit risk (NPF), liquidity risk (FDR), income (ROA, ROE and BOPO) and capital (CAR). On the results of Good Corporate Governance using data processed and obtained from PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri. The object of this research is PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri. The sampling technique in this study using purposive sampling. This research period is 2013-2017. The data analysis technique used in this research is quantitative descriptive and using the RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings and Car), as for the benchmarks to determine the soundness level of a bank after each examination, namely by determining the results of the study classified into the bank's health rating. The results showed that the health of PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri which uses the Risk Profile approach, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital as a whole can be said that Bank Syariah Mandiri is a fairly healthy bank.

scholarly journals ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN KINERJA KEUANGAN BANK PEMERINTAH (BUMN) DAN BANK UMUM SWASTA NASIONAL (BUSN) DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE PENDEKATAN RGEC (RISK PROFIL E,GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNING AND CAPITAL)YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA TAHUN 2014-2018

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 127
Author(s):  
Debby Suciani ◽  
Yulita Triadiarti
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
T Test ◽  
Capital Adequacy ◽  
Return On Equity ◽  
Purposive Sampling ◽  
Whitney Test ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Mann Whitney Test ◽  
Capital Adequacy Ratio

ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji apakah terdapat perbedaan kinerja keuangan yang signifikan antara bank pemerintah (BUMN) dengan Bank Umum Swasta Nasional (BUSN) di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2014-2018. . Kinerja keuangan diukur dengan menggunakan metode pendekatan RGEC yaitu Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning, and Capital. Aspek Risk Profile diukur menggunakan rasio Non Performing Loan (NPL),aspek Good Corporate Governance diukur menggunakan nilai komposit GCG, aspek Earning diukur menggunakan rasio Return on Equity (ROE), dan aspek Capital diukur menggunakan Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR). Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh bank yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) tahun 2014 - 2018. Dari 42 perbankan yang terdaftar, dipilih 4 bank pemerintah (BUMN) dan 4 Bank Umum Swasta Nasional dengan menggunakan purposive sampling. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah data sekunder, yang diperoleh dari situs www.idx.co.id, www.ojk.go.id, dan www.bi.go.id. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah analisis deskriptif kuantitatif, uji normalitas, Independent Sample T-test dan Mann Whitney Test. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan kinerja keuangan yang signifikan antara bank pemerintah (BUMN) dan Bank Umum Swasta Nasional (BUSN) dilihat dari aspek Earning yang diukur dengan rasio Return on Equity (ROE). Dan tidak terdapat perbedaan kinerja keuangan yang signifikan antara bank pemerintah (BUMN) dan Bank Umum Swasta Nasional (BUSN) jika dilihat dari aspek Risk Profile yang diukur dengan rasio Non Performing Loan (NPL), aspek Good Corporate Governance yang diukur dari nilai komposit GCG, dan aspek Capital yang diukur dengan Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR). Kata Kunci : Perbandingan, Kinerja Keuangan, Non Performing Loan, Nilai Komposit GCG, Return on Equity, dan Capital Adequacy Ratio. 

scholarly journals Risk Based Bank Rating dalam Mengukur Tingkat Kesehatan Perbankan

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-123
Author(s):  
Neny Tri Indrianasari ◽  
Khoirul Ifa
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Time Series Data ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Series Data ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Source Data ◽  
The Government ◽  
Descriptive Method

The Financial Services Authority assesses the national banking industry in the better shape shown by some indicators, one of which the involvement of the Government in realizing economic growth. With the better banking conditions will marimbas Bank on growth Of Islamic Peoples. This research aims to know the level of health of bank Syariah BPR in East Java by using methods of Risk-Based Bank Rating. The assessment by the method of Risk-Based Bank Rating consists of four factors of risk profile, Good Corporate Governance, earning and capital of each bank. This research uses descriptive method quantitative approach to analyze the ratio-the ratio of the measured. The data type used is the time series data of the year 2015 – 2017. Source data obtained from the Financial Services Authority website (OJK). Data analysis techniques using analysis of Risk-Based Bank Rating (RBBR) consist of four-factor risk profile, Good Corporate Governance, earning and capital. The study concluded that the overall average value of NPF Bank Of Islamic People (BPRS) of 13.37% unhealthy, with an average overall rating Of Sharia Rural Banks ROA (BPRS) of 0.11% with the predicate less healthy and that the average overall rating Of Sharia Rural Banks CAR (BPRS) amounted to 28.47% with very healthy.

scholarly journals ANALISIS TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN PENERAPAN METODE RGEC (RISK PROFILE, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNINGS DAN CAPITAL) PADA PT.BANK BENGKULU

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-91
Author(s):  
Yun Fitriano ◽  
Ririn Marlina Sofyan
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Health Level ◽  
Bank Soundness

This study aims to determine the health level of PT. Bank Bengkulu in the 2014-2016 period if measured using the RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital). Based on the results of the assessment of bank soundness by applying the RGEC method at PT. Bank Bengkulu is seen from factors, namely 1. Risk Profile, the results of the 2014 NPL ratio of 0.39%, in 2015 amounted to 0.39%, and in 2016 amounting to 0.33% can be said to be very healthy. The results of the LDR ratio in 2014 amounted to 85.79%, in 2015 amounted to 91.05%, and in 2016 amounting to 93.31% this could be said to be quite healthy. 2. Good Corporate Governance in the 2014-2016 period of 89.33% can be said to be very healthy. 3. Eanings, the results of the 2014 ROA ratio amounted to 3.69%, in 2015 amounted to 3.29%, and in 2016 amounting to 3.02% this could be said to be very healthy. The results of the BOPO ratio in 2014 amounted to 74.10%, in 2015 amounted to 80.54%, and in 2016 amounting to 77.71% this could be said to be very healthy. 4. Capital, the results of the 2014 CAR ratio amounted to 16.99%, in 2015 amounted to 21.39%, and in 2016 amounting to 19.07% can be said to be very healthy. The results of the health research at PT. Bank Bengkulu in the 2014-2016 period showed that PT. The Bengkulu Bank gets PK 1, which is very healthy.

scholarly journals Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Dengan Menggunakan Metode Risk-Based Bank Rating (RBBR) (Studi Pada Bank yang Termasuk Saham LQ45 Sub Sektor Perbankan Tahun 2010–2016)

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bobby Wijaya
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Capital Adequacy ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Return On Assets ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Health Level ◽  
Net Interest Margin ◽  
Capital Adequacy Ratio

This paper seeks to find out the health level of banks in Indonesia Stock Exchange LQ45 Index. It used descriptive methods with qualitative approach that is Risk Based Bank Rating (RBBR) model. RBBR model consists of 4 factors among others: risk profile, good corporate governance (GCG), earnings and capital factor.The analytical tool used in this study is the assessment of the level of health of banks in Indonesia Stock Exchange LQ45 Index against the risk factor using the ratio of net performing loans (NPLs) and Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR), a factor of corporate governance by using the self-assessment report of good corporate governance, the earnings factor using the ratio of return on assets (ROA) and net interest margin (NIM) and the factor of capital using the ratio of capital adequacy ratio (CAR). The results showed that there are several banks which have "Less Healthy", "Healthy Enough", "Pretty Good". Bank Mandiri, BRI and BNI received the predicate of "Pretty Good" in risk profile factor for liquidity risk, whereas Bank BTN received the predicate of "Healthy Enough". Also, Bank BTN received the predicate of "Healthy Enough" and "Pretty Good" in earnings factor specifically ROA and GCG factor. Keywords:Indonesia Stock Exchange LQ45 Index, Health Level of Banks, Risk Based Bank Rating (RBBR) Model.

scholarly journals Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank: Pendekatan CAMEL Dan RGEC

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika Amelia ◽  
Astiti Chandra Aprilianti
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Asset Management ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Sound Level ◽  
Capital Asset ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Bank Soundness

This study aims to determine the risk based bank rating at PT. Bank Maybank SyariahIndonesia if measured using CAMEL (Capital, Asset, Management, Earning,Liquidity) method and RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning,Capital) in 2011-2016 and also aims to know differences in ratios used in CAMELSand RGEC methods. The research method used in this research is literature researchor study desk study. The data used in this research is secondary data using financialstatements of Bank Maybank Syariah Indonesia Period 2011-2016. The results showthat the bank can be said to be adequately sound because almost all the ratios usedmeet the specified requirements and there are still some ratios that have not met therequirements, but in both methods have different results. In the year 2011-2014 therisk based bank rating of Maybank Syariah Bank is calculated using CAMEL methodof bank is in the sound level. In 2015 -2016, the calculation of bank soundness showsthat bank condition is in an sound level. In Maybank Syariah Bank the state of thebank is in the sound level is in 2011-2013 if calculated using the RGEC method. Inthe year 2014-2016 the condition of the bank shows a adequately sound level.

scholarly journals PERBANDINGAN TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK UMUM KONVENSIONAL DAN BANK UMUM SYARIAH MENGGUNAKAN METODE RGEC (RISK PROFILE, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNINGS, DAN CAPITAL)

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 635-653
Author(s):  
Zara Zettyra R. D ◽  
Evi Mutia
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Commercial Banks ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
T Test ◽  
Islamic Banks ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Significant Difference

The purpose of this study was to see a comparison of the health levels of conventional commercial banks and Islamic commercial banks using the RGEC method in the 2014-2017 period. The sample of this study were 30 conventional commercial banks and 11 sharia commercial banks. The assessment used uses the RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital) Risk Profile seen through the NPL and NPF indicators for conventional commercial banks while Islamic banks use LDR and FDR. Corporate governance is measured through Self Assessment. Earnings are measured through ROA and NIM indicators. Capital is measured based on the CAR indicator. Testing the hypothesis in this study using the Independent T-Test and Mann-Wnithey Test samples. The results of this study indicate that there is a difference between conventional commercial banks and Islamic commercial banks seen from the ratio of NPL, LDR, and ROA. While the ratio of GCG, NIM, and CAR does not have a significant difference between conventional commercial banks and Islamic commercial banks.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document