scholarly journals Localizing Heat-Generating Defects Using Fluorescent Microthermal Imaging

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Tangyunyong ◽  
A.Y. Liang ◽  
A.W. Righter ◽  
D.L. Barton ◽  
J.M. Soden
Keyword(s):  
Failure Analysis ◽  
Focused Ion Beam ◽  
Uv Light ◽  
Ion Beam ◽  
Sample Surface ◽  
Analysis Tool ◽  
Temperature Dependent ◽  
Root Cause ◽  
Ideal Situation ◽  
Sem Imaging

Abstract Fluorescent microthermal imaging (FMI) involves coating a sample surface with a thin fluorescent film that, upon exposure to UV light source, emits temperature-dependent fluorescence [1-7]. The principle behind FMI was thoroughly reviewed at the ISTFA in 1994 [8, 9]. In two recent publications [10,11], we identified several factors in film preparation and data processing that dramatically improved the thermal resolution and sensitivity of FMI. These factors include signal averaging, the use of base mixture films, film stabilization and film curing. These findings significantly enhance the capability of FMI as a failure analysis tool. In this paper, we show several examples that use FMI to quickly localize heat-generating defects ("hot spots"). When used with other failure analysis techniques such as focused ion beam (FIB) cross sectioning and scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging, we demonstrate that FMI is a powerful tool to efficiently identify the root cause of failures in complex ICs. In addition to defect localization, we use a failing IC to determine the sensitivity of FMI (i.e., the lowest power that can be detected) in an ideal situation where the defects are very localized and near the surface.

Application of Focused Ion Beam System as A Defect Localization and Root Cause Analysis Tool

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.C. Ooi ◽  
K.H. Siek ◽  
K.S. Sim
Keyword(s):  
Failure Analysis ◽  
Focused Ion Beam ◽  
Ion Beam ◽  
Fault Isolation ◽  
Analysis Tool ◽  
Root Cause ◽  
Beam System ◽  
Defect Localization ◽  
Challenging Environment ◽  
Microprocessor Technology

Abstract Focused ion beam system has been widely used as a critical failure analysis tool as microprocessor technology advances at a ramping speed. It has become an essential step in failure analysis to reveal physical defects post electrical fault isolation. In this highly competitive and challenging environment prevalent today, failure analysis throughput time is of utmost important. Therefore quick, efficient and reliable physical failure analysis technique is needed to avoid potential issues from becoming bigger. This paper will discuss the applications of FIB as a defect localization and root cause determination tool through the passive charge contrast technique and pattern FIB analysis.

Magnetic Head Shorting Failure Analysis

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Hong ◽  
Jia Li ◽  
Haifeng Wang
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Failure Analysis ◽  
Focused Ion Beam ◽  
Ion Beam ◽  
Tem Analysis ◽  
Resistance Change ◽  
Root Cause ◽  
Transmission Electron ◽  
Root Cause Failure Analysis ◽  
Metal Layers

Abstract This paper provides an innovative root cause failure analysis method that combines multiple failure analysis (FA) techniques to narrow down and expose the shorting location and allow the material analysis of the shorting defect. It begins with a basic electrical testing to narrow down shorting metal layers, then utilizing mechanical lapping to expose over coat layers. This is followed by optical beam induced resistance change imaging to further narrow down the shorting location. Scanning electron microscopy and optical imaging are used together with focused ion beam milling to slice and view through the potential shorting area until the shorting defect is exposed. Finally, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) sample is prepared, and TEM analysis is carried out to pin point the root cause of the shorting. This method has been demonstrated successfully on Western Digital inter-metal layers shorting FA.

A Method to Enhance the Front-Side Lapping Process for Localisation of Sub-Surface Defect for Advanced Packages

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sze Yee Tan ◽  
Chiu Soon Wong ◽  
Chea Wee Lo ◽  
Cin Sheng Goh
Keyword(s):  
Failure Analysis ◽  
Surface Defect ◽  
Focused Ion Beam ◽  
Ion Beam ◽  
Assembly Process ◽  
Front Side ◽  
Root Cause ◽  
The Common ◽  
Thinning Process ◽  
Non Destructive

Abstract In the back-end assembly process, all of the packages will be tested prior to disposition to the customers in order to filter out any device with failure. For a reject unit with an unknown failure mechanism, it will be subjected to a comprehensive failure analysis (FA) to identify the root cause of the failure. Non-destructive verification, following by front-side decapsulation and internal physical inspection is the common way to visualise and identify the physical defect that usually causes the failure of a device during the back-end assembly process. For certain failures, visualization of the defect might not be straight forward after the decapsulation because the defect may be embedded or buried underneath a layer or wedge bond on the die. In this case, a more complicated FA analysis flow which comprises various precision techniques such as parallel lapping, hotspot localisation and focused-ion-beam (FIB) analyses will be needed to thin down the top layer/wedge bond for a precise localisation of the defect prior to precision analysis by FIB. However, the process to thin down the top layer/wedge bond with an exposed die of a partially decapsulated package is a tricky job as artefacts such as crack/scratches on die are likely to be introduced during the process of polishing. Also it is relatively difficult to control the thickness and levelling of the top layer/wedge bond during the thinning process. In this work, we developed a method that allows the analyst to re-cap the partially decapped package, and also to precisely measure and thin down the top layer to an accuracy of less than < 2um without the introduction of artefacts.

Failure Analysis Work Flow for Electrical Shorts in Triple Stacked 3D TSV Daisy Chains

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (1) ◽  
pp. 000469-000473 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Gaudestad ◽  
A. Orozco ◽  
I. De Wolf ◽  
T. Wang ◽  
T. Webers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Failure Analysis ◽  
Focused Ion Beam ◽  
Ion Beam ◽  
Fault Isolation ◽  
Root Cause ◽  
Current Path ◽  
Dual Beam ◽  
Resolution Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Field Imaging ◽  
Non Destructive

In this paper we show an efficient workflow that combines Magnetic Field Imaging (MFI) and Dual Beam Plasma Focused Ion Beam (DB-PFIB) for fast and efficient Fault Isolation and root cause analysis in 2.5/3D devices. The work proves MFI is the best method for Electric Fault Isolation (EFI) of short failures in 2.5/3D Through Silicon Via (TSV) triple stacked devices in a true non-destructive way by imaging the current path. To confirm the failing locations and to do Physical Failure Analysis (PFA), a DB-PFIB system was used for cross sectioning and volume analysis of the TSV structures and high resolution imaging of the identified defects. With a DB-PFIB, the fault is exposed and analyzed without any sample prep artifacts seen in mechanical polishing or laser preparation techniques and done in a considerably shorter amount of time than that required when using a traditional Gallium Focused Ion Beam (FIB).

Defect Localization and Root Cause Analysis on e-Fuse Read Reliability Failure

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hung Chin Chen ◽  
Chih Yang Tsai ◽  
Shih Yuan Liu ◽  
Yu Pang Chang ◽  
Jian Chang Lin
Keyword(s):  
Failure Analysis ◽  
Focused Ion Beam ◽  
Metal Layer ◽  
Ion Beam ◽  
Fault Isolation ◽  
Resistance Change ◽  
Cause Analysis ◽  
Root Cause ◽  
Failure Location ◽  
Rate Of Failure

Abstract Fault isolation is the most important step for Failure Analysis (FA), and it is closely linked with the success rate of failure mechanism finding. In this paper, we will introduce a case that hard to debug with traditional FA skills. In order to find out its root cause, several advanced techniques such as layout tracing, circuit edit and Infrared Ray–Optical Beam Induced Resistance Change (IR-OBIRCH) analysis had been applied. The circuit edit was performed following layout tracing for depositing probing pads by Focused Ion Beam (FIB). Then, IR-OBIRCH analysis with biasing on the two FIB deposited probing pads and a failure location was detected. Finally, the root cause of inter- metal layer bridge was found in subsequent physical failure analysis.

Failure Analysis Work Flow for Electrical Shorts in Triple Stacked 3D TSV Daisy Chains

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Gaudestad ◽  
A. Orozco ◽  
I. De Wolf ◽  
T. Wang ◽  
T. Webers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Failure Analysis ◽  
Focused Ion Beam ◽  
Ion Beam ◽  
Fault Isolation ◽  
Root Cause ◽  
Current Path ◽  
Dual Beam ◽  
Resolution Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Field Imaging ◽  
Non Destructive

Abstract In this paper we show an efficient workflow that combines Magnetic Field Imaging (MFI) and Dual Beam Plasma Focused Ion Beam (DB-PFIB) for fast and efficient Fault Isolation and root cause analysis in 2.5/3D devices. The work proves MFI is the best method for Electric Fault Isolation (EFI) of short failures in 2.5/3D Through Silicon Via (TSV) triple stacked devices in a true non-destructive way by imaging the current path. To confirm the failing locations and to do Physical Failure Analysis (PFA), a DB-PFIB system was used for cross sectioning and volume analysis of the TSV structures and high resolution imaging of the identified defects. With a DB-PFIB, the fault is exposed and analyzed without any sample prep artifacts seen in mechanical polishing or laser preparation techniques and done in a considerably shorter amount of time than that required when using a traditional Gallium Focused Ion Beam (FIB).

Analysis of Voltage Contrast in Secondary Electron Images Using a High-Energy Electron Spectrometer

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natsuko Asano ◽  
Shunsuke Asahina ◽  
Natasha Erdman
Keyword(s):  
Focused Ion Beam ◽  
Ion Beam ◽  
Sample Surface ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Secondary Electrons ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Quantitative Understanding ◽  
Voltage Contrast ◽  
Acceleration Voltage ◽  
Failure Localization

Abstract Voltage contrast (VC) observation using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) or a focused ion beam (FIB) is a common failure analysis technique for semiconductor devices.[1] The VC information allows understanding of failure localization issues. In general, VC images are acquired using secondary electrons (SEs) from a sample surface at an acceleration voltage of 0.8–2.0 kV in SEM. In this study, we aimed to find an optimized electron energy range for VC acquisition using Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) for quantitative understanding.

Direct Plan View FIB Liftout for Near-Surface Defect Analysis in TEM

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Max L. Lifson ◽  
Carla M. Chapman ◽  
D. Philip Pokrinchak ◽  
Phyllis J. Campbell ◽  
Greg S. Chrisman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Failure Analysis ◽  
Silicon Germanium ◽  
Focused Ion Beam ◽  
Surface Defects ◽  
Ion Beam ◽  
Misfit Dislocations ◽  
Tem Analysis ◽  
Plan View ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Straightforward Method

Abstract Plan view TEM imaging is a powerful technique for failure analysis and semiconductor process characterization. Sample preparation for near-surface defects requires additional care, as the surface of the sample needs to be protected to avoid unintentionally induced damage. This paper demonstrates a straightforward method to create plan view samples in a dual beam focused ion beam (FIB) for TEM studies of near-surface defects, such as misfit dislocations in heteroepitaxial growths. Results show that misfit dislocations are easily imaged in bright-field TEM and STEM for silicon-germanium epitaxial growth. Since FIB tools are ubiquitous in semiconductor failure analysis labs today, the plan view method presented provides a quick to implement, fast, consistent, and straightforward method of generating samples for TEM analysis. While this technique has been optimized for near-surface defects, it can be used with any application requiring plan view TEM analysis.

Fast Turn-around Failure Analysis of Metal Interconnection Using FIB and LA ICP-MS

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zixiao Pan ◽  
Wei Wei ◽  
Fuhe Li
Keyword(s):  
Failure Analysis ◽  
Inductively Coupled Plasma ◽  
Structural Damage ◽  
Focused Ion Beam ◽  
Ion Beam ◽  
Detection Sensitivity ◽  
Chemical Contamination ◽  
Inductively Coupled ◽  
Minimal Sample ◽  
Icp Ms

Abstract This paper introduces our effort in failure analysis of a 200 nm thick metal interconnection on a glass substrate and covered with a passivation layer. Structural damage in localized areas of the metal interconnections was observed with the aid of focused ion beam (FIB) cross-sectioning. Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (LA ICP-MS) was then applied to the problematic areas on the interconnection for chemical survey. LA ICP-MS showed direct evidence of localized chemical contamination, which has likely led to corrosion (or over-etching) of the metal interconnection and the assembly failure. Due to the high detection sensitivity of LA ICP-MS and its compatibility with insulating material analysis, minimal sample preparation is required. As a result, the combination of FIB and LA ICP-MS enabled successful meso-scale failure analysis with fast turnaround and reasonable cost.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document