scholarly journals Pengaruh Pendekatan Accelerated Learning terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-140
Author(s):  
Qomario Qomario
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
T Test ◽  
Accelerated Learning ◽  
Learning Approach ◽  
Test Calculation ◽  
Mathematics Problem Solving ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Mathematics Problem

The aim of the study was to know the effect of accelerated learning on mathematics problem solving. This was a quasi experimental study.  The subject was class VA and VB. The hyphotesis testing used t test calculation. The result was ttest result = 3,071 and  ttabel = 2,001, because tobtain > ttable so that H0 was rejected and H1 was accepted. Tjerefor, it can be concluded  that   accelerated learning was significantly influence in improving students mathematics problem solving. Keywords:  Accelerated Learning Approach, Mathematics Solving Problem

scholarly journals ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH BERDASARKAN TEORI KRULIK DAN RUTNICK DALAM MENGERJAKAN SOAL OLIMPIADE OLEH SISWA SMP

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 42
Author(s):  
Trimahesti Trimahesti ◽  
Kriswandani Kriswandani ◽  
Novisita Ratu
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Purposive Sampling ◽  
Mathematics Problem Solving ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Extend Abstract ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Mathematics Problem

Abstrak: Penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif kualitatif, yang bertujuan untuk mengetahui kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika dalam mengerjakan soal olimpiade SMP bagi siswa kelas IX SMP N 8 Salatiga. Subjek penelitian terdiri dari 4 siswa yang dipilih dengan teknik purposive sampling. Berdasarkan hasil tes dan wawancara diketahui semua subjek tidak memenuhi kelima tahap Krulik & Rudnick pada soal nomor 1. Pada langkah awal tahap membaca dan berfikir (read and think) subjek  telah melakukan kesalahan dalam memahami soal/masalah. Sedangkan untuk soal nomor 2 hanya 1 subjek yang tidak mampu melewati tahap kelima pada tahap teori Krulik dan Rudnick yaitu refleksi dan pengembangan (reflect and extend). Abstract:  This is a qualitative descriptive research. The purpose of this research is to know the ability of mathematics problem solving in doing Junior High Olympics for students of grade IX SMP N 8 Salatiga. The research subjects consist of 4 students selected by purposive sampling technique. Based on the results of tests and interviews are known that all subjects did not meet the five stages of Krulik & Rudnick in question number 1. In the first step of reading and thinking phase, the subject has made a mistake in understanding the problem. Meanwhile, in question number 2 only 1 subject who is not able to pass the fifth stage at the stage of Krulik and Rudnick theory, that is reflect and extend.

scholarly journals Metacognition Profile of Vocational High School Students in Mathematics Problem Solving Based on Logical Thinking Skills

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 1027-1037
Author(s):  
Mu'jizatin Fadiana ◽  
Andriani Andriani
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Logical Thinking ◽  
Vocational High School ◽  
School Students ◽  
Mathematics Problem Solving ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Abstract Operation ◽  
Mathematics Problem

This study describes the profile of vocational high school students' metacognitive abilities in mathematics problem solving based on their logical thinking abilities. This research was conducted using descriptive research methods with a qualitative approach. The data was collected using a logical thinking ability test and problem-solving test and. Three students were selected who met different logical thinking stages: the abstract operation stage, the transition stage, and the concrete operational stage. The results showed the subject of the abstract operation stage fulfilled the metacognition stage by re-describing the given problem, knowing the relationship between what was known and what was asked, working on the problem by writing down what was known and asked and entering into the formula and also checking the answer. Transition stage subjects fulfill the metacognition stage by describing initial information and instructions, performing problem-solving steps, and counting to check completed work. The subject of concrete operations fulfills the metacognition stage by stating information and instructions that are non-specific and detailed. The subject has not been able to state the proper steps to ensure the information's conformity with the problem, and the subject sees what is done by calculating.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient Siswa

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-44
Author(s):  
Abdul Ma'arif ◽  
Syaiful Syaiful ◽  
Muhammad Haris Effendi Hasibuan
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Learning Cycle ◽  
Cycle Model ◽  
Problem Solving Skills ◽  
Mathematics Problem Solving ◽  
8Th Grade ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
Mathematics Problem

Problem-solving skill is required by students and a target in studying mathematics. However, the problem-solving skill of Indonesian students are lacking. One effort that can be done is applying the Model of Learning Cycle 5E.  This research discussed the influence of the implementation of the learning cycle model on mathematics problem-solving skill viewed from students’ adversity quotient. This research used a quantitive approach, quasi-experimental study. The subjects were the 8th Grade students of SMP IT Ash-Shiddiiqi Jambi, consisting of two experiment classes and one control class. The instruments were post-test and adversity quotient questionnaire modified by Stoltz and had been validated by experts. Data analysis was conducted by Two-Way ANOVA. The results showed that there was no interaction between the learning cycle 5E model and mathematics problem-solving skill. This finding indicates that the model of learning cycle 5E affects problem-solving skills and can be applied to students with all types of adversity quotient.

scholarly journals Perbandingan keefektifan pembelajaran berbasis proyek dan pembelajaran berbasis masalah ditinjau dari ketercapaian tujuan pembelajaran

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-188
Author(s):  
Raoda Ismail
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Project Based Learning ◽  
T Test ◽  
Problem Solving Skills ◽  
Learning Mathematics ◽  
Research Population ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Comparison Of Effectiveness ◽  
Mathematics Problem

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan pembelajaran matematika dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran berbasis proyek dan model pembelajaran berbasis masalah, dan perbandingan keefektifan pembelajaran berbasis proyek dengan pembelajaran berbasis masalah ditinjau dari sikap percaya diri, pencapaian belajar matematika, dan keterampilan pemecahan masalah. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian eksperimen semu dengan desain kelompok pretes-postes beracak. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 9 Yogyakarta. Sampel penelitian sebanyak dua kelas yang dipilih secara acak. Data hasi penelitian dianalisis dengan MANOVA, dan untuk mengetahui keefektifan pembelajaran berbasis proyek dan pembelajaran berbasis masalah menggunakan uji one sample t-test. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model pembelajaran berbasis proyek efektif ditinjau dari sikap percaya diri dan keterampilan pemecahan masalah namun tidak efektif ditinjau dari pencapaian belajar matematika; model pembelajaran berbasis masalah efektif ditinjau dari sikap percaya diri, pencapaian belajar matematika, dan keterampilan pemecahan masalah; dan pembelajaran berbasis masalah lebih efektif dari pembelajaran berbasis proyek ditinjau dari pencapaian belajar matematika. The comparison of effectiveness of project-based learning and problem-based learning in terms of achievement of student’s learning objectives AbstractThis study aims to describe: the effectiveness of teaching mathematics using project-based learning and problem-based learning; and the comparison in the effectiveness between project-based learning and problem-based learning in terms of the attitude of confidence, achievement of learning mathematics, and problem solving skills. This study is a quasi-experimental study employing the pretest-posttest nonequivalent group design. The research population comprised all year VIII students of SMPN 9 Yogyakarta. The sample consisted of two classes that were randomly established. The data were analysed by means of MANOVA, and to test the effectiveness of project-based learning and problem-based learning using one sample t-test. The result of this study shows that: project-based learning is effective in terms of the attitude of confidence and problem solving skills but not effective in learning based on achievement of learning mathematics; problem-based learning is effective in terms of the attitude of confidence, achievement of learning mathematics, and problem solving skills; and problem-based learning more effective than project-based learning based on achievement of learning mathematics.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Generatif terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 219
Author(s):  
Dewi Sulistiawati
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Generative Learning ◽  
Scientific Journals ◽  
Problem Solving Skills ◽  
Mathematics Problem Solving ◽  
Normality Test ◽  
Mathematics Problem

<p><em>The benefit of this research is to analyze the Impacts of Generative Learning Model on Mathematics problem Solving Skills. The method used in this research is experiment through t test. To collect the data about generative learning model, the writer used her idea, scientific books, scientific journals, internet and others documents. The research was conducted on the students of class VII H and VII G at Public SMP in  west Cikarang. The sample is about 60 students. Before using generative learning model’s instruments, they was validated and past reability test. After that the writer  done normality test through chi kuadrat test and homogeneity test through fisher test. Based on the research,  t test ? t table (2.21 ? 1.697). it  means there are significant impacts of Generative learning model on Mathematics problem solving. It can be concluded that there are significant impacts of Generative Learning Model on Mathematics problem Solving Skills.</em></p>

scholarly journals Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika Melalui Pendekatan Pemecahan Masalah dengan Strategi Polya Pada Siswa Kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 2 Kalukku

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-56
Author(s):  
Sudirman .
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Average Score ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Planning Stage ◽  
Mathematics Problem Solving ◽  
Quantitative Analyses ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Mathematics Problem

The study is a classroom action research which aims at describing (1) the improvement of Mathematics learning result through problem solving approach by Polya strategy of class XI IPA students at SMAN 2 Kalukku, (2) the improvement of Mathematics problem solving skill by Polya strategy. The subject is students of class XI IPA of SMAN 2 Kalukku, as many as 31 people consisted of 11 male and 20 female students. The technique used to analyze the data is qualitative and quantitative analyses. The qualitative data is used on students’ activities while the quantitative data is used on students’ learning achievement and students’ response. The results indicate that (1) the application of problem solving approach by Polya strategy can improve students’ learning achievement on Mathematics indicated by the descriptive analysis of the average score of students’ learning achievement 65.42 at cycle I to 75.06 at cycle II; (2) the application of problem solving approach by Polya strategy can improve students’ problem solving skill on Mathematics indicated by percentage descriptive analysis, which is problem comprehension stage 83.87% at cycle I to 90.32% at cycle II, problem solving planning stage 87.10% at cycle I to 96.77% at cycle II,

scholarly journals Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Mahasiswa melalui Model Pembelajaran Group Investigation

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (02) ◽  
pp. 177-188
Author(s):  
Tanti Jumaisyaroh Siregar
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Mathematical Problem ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Study Program ◽  
Mathematics Problem Solving ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Direct Learning ◽  
Essay Tests ◽  
North Sumatra ◽  
Mathematics Problem

The problem solving ability of students still low the problem of this research was mathematics. The purposes of this research was to know analyze improvement in mathematics problem solving ability  of students that given group investigation learning with students that given  direct learning. This type of research is a quasi-experimental research. The population in this study were all students of Mathematics Education Study Program UIN North Sumatra Medan and the samples were taken by cluster random sampling based on existing classes, namely PMM-4 class as an experimental class and PMM-2 as a control class. Data collection techniques in this study were using tests of students' mathematical problem solving abilities (pre tests and post tests) in the form of essay tests. The collected data is then searched for the N-gain value and analyzed using t test with SPSS 17 software.. Based of the results analysis, it showed that: Improvment  of the students’ mathematics problem solving ability that given group investigation learning model was higher than the students’ mathematics problem solving abiliy that given direct learning. His then, suggested that group investigation learning model  used for lectures to improved students’ mathematics problem solving ability.

scholarly journals PENGEMBANGAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF DAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIS MAHASISWA MELALUI METODE DISKUSI

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
La Moma
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
First Semester ◽  
Mathematics Problem Solving ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
Creative Thinking Ability ◽  
Different Levels ◽  
Mathematics Problem

Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk mengetahui seberapa besar kontribusi perkuliahan kajian matematika sekolah 1 dengan metode diskusi terhadap pengembangan kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis dan kemampan pemecahan masalah mahasiswa pada level KAM (atas, sedang, rendah). Penelitian ini merupakan tipe penelitian kuasi eksperimen. Sampel pada penelitian ini terdiri 89 orang mahasiswa semester 1 tahun pada Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika yang mewakili mahasiswa level tinggi, sedang, dan rendah. Data diperoleh lewat tes, sedang analisis data dilakukan lewat uji t dan anava dua jalur. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) ada perbedaan pencapaian KBKM mahasiswa antara kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol; (2) ada perbedaan pencapaian KPMM mahasiswa antara kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol; (3) tidak terdapat interaksi antara pembelajaran dan KAM mahasiswa terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis; dan (4) tidak ada interaksi antara pembelajaran dan mahasiswa terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis. DEVELOPING MATHEMATICAL CREATIVE THINKING AND PROBLEM SOLVING ABILITY THROUGH DISCUSSION METHOD Abstract: This study is aimed at determining the contribution of generative learning model using discussion method to the development of creative thinking ability and mathematics problem solving at different levels (high, medium, low). This study is a quasi-experimental research involving 89 first semester mathematics students represesenting different levels. Data were collected through test and analyzed using t-test, and two-way ANOVA. The results of the study are: (1) the creative thinking ability of students in experiment class and that of students in controll class are different, (2) the KPMM of experiement class and that of control class are different, (3) learning and KAM level have no correlation with creative thinking ability, and (4) learning and KAM level have no correlation mathematics problem solving ability. Keywords: Creative thinking ability, mathematics problem solving, discussion method

scholarly journals Keefektifan pendekatan problem posing dan problem solving dalam pembelajaran kalkulus II

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 234
Author(s):  
Markus Palobo
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
T Test ◽  
Problem Posing ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
The One ◽  
Approach Problem

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan pendekatan problem posing dan problem solving serta membandingkan keefektifan pendekatan problem posing dengan problem solving ditinjau dari sikap mahasiswa terhadap Kalkulus dan prestasi belajar. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu dengan desain pretest-posttest non equivalent comparison group design. Populasi pada penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa Universitas Musamus Merauke. Sampel penelitian adalah mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika semester II yang dibagi dalam dua kelompok. Pengujian keefektifan pendekatan problem posing dan problem solving menggunakan uji one sample t-test dan untuk mengetahui pendekatan mana yang lebih efektif menggunakan uji independent sample t-test. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa (1) pendekatan problem posing efektif ditinjau dari sikap terhadap Kalkulus dan prestasi belajar; (2) pendekatan problem solving efektif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar; dan (3) pendekatan problem posing lebih efektif dari pada pendekatan problem solving ditinjau dari sikap mahasiswa terhadap Kalkulus.Kata Kunci: pendekatan problem posing, pendekatan problem solving, sikap terhadap kalkulus, prestasi belajar The effectiveness of problem posing and problem solving approach in calculus II learning AbstractThis study aimed to describe the effectiveness of problem posing and problem solving approach, and to compare the effectiveness between problem posing and problem solving approach in terms of attitude toward Calculus and learning achievement. This study was a quasi-experimental study using the pretest-posttest non-equivalent comparison group design. The population of this study were student of Musamus University. The sample in this study were 2nd semester students of mathematics educations departement who were divided into two groups. To assess the effectiveness of the problem posing and problem solving approach, the one sample t-test was carried out and to determine the more effective approach, independent sample t-test was used. The results of this study show that (1) the problem posing approach was effective in terms of attitude towards Calculus and learning achievement; (2) problem solving approach was effective in terms of learning achievement; and (3) problem posing approach was more effective than problem solving approach in terms of students attitude toward calculus.Keywords: problem posing approach, problem solving approach, attitude toward Calculus, leraning achievement

scholarly journals Eksperimen model pembelajaran MMP dan Problem Solving terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-141
Author(s):  
Ika Risti Nurhaliza ◽  
Isnaeni Maryam
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Mathematical Problem ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Mathematics Problem Solving ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Mathematics Problem ◽  
Better Than ◽  
Normally Distributed

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the mathematics problem-solving abilities of students who received the Missouri Mathematics Project (MMP) learning model were better than the mathematics problem-solving abilities of students who received the Problem Solving learning model. The research was conducted at MTs Al-Iman Bulus Purworejo class IX A and IX B. The research method used was a quasi-experimental design, which refers to the instrument of students' mathematical problem-solving abilities. The study population came from grade IX students, with a total of 401 students. The sampling technique was cluster random sampling. The prerequisite test of normality, homogeneity, and balance before treatment showed that the data were normally distributed, homogeneous, and balanced. The prerequisite test for normality and homogeneity of the data after treatment showed that the data were normally distributed and homogeneous. The hypothesis test calculation using the t-test obtained of 2,2431 and with α = 5% ( ) of 1,6667. Based on the hypothesis testing results, the value of then is rejected; this means that the problem-solving ability of students who receive the MMP learning model is better than students who receive the Problem Solving learning model.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document