scholarly journals KEDUDUKAN ORGANISASI KEMASYARAKATAN ASING DI INDONESIA DI TINJAU DARI PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR 59 TAHUN 2016

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 198
Author(s):  
Elwidarifa Marwenny ◽  
Engrina Fauzi ◽  
Jelisye Putri Cenery
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Qualitative Method ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Community Organization ◽  
Community Organizations ◽  
The State ◽  
The Other ◽  
Human Right ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
The Government

One of the form of applying the value of democratic in Indonesia is accommodate by the regulation of community organization which is concretely regulated in the provisions of article 28 E Paragraph 3 of the 1945 constitution also in the provisions of law number 39 of 1999 on Human Rights. The existence of community organizations does have a great constribution in the implementation of the state, but on the other hand the existence of people raises the pro and contra. The enecment of government regulation number 59 on community organization established by foreign citizens makes the community more worried if the exixtance of community organizations affect the sovereignty of NKRI because they have different ideology with Indonesia. Based on this, it should be discussed about the organizations in Indonesia. The position of foreign social organizatios in Indonesia is reviwed from the government regulation number 59 of 2016 on community organizations established by foreign citizens and the influence of basic organizations for the sovereignty of NKRI. To answer that question, qualitative method is used  as a means to answer the problem by conducting of normative juridical approach which is done by reviewing the law and the literature. Based on this study, it is concluded that the existence of foreign social organizatios in Indonesia in line with  democracy and human right but also politically can treaten NKRI.

scholarly journals Religious Freedom in Indonesia: An Islamic Human Right Perspective

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 71
Author(s):  
Linda Evirianti
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Religious Freedom ◽  
The State ◽  
Human Existence ◽  
The Other ◽  
Human Right ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Constitutional State ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

Everyone has the right of religious freedom or belief which becomes one of important parts of Human Rights (HAM/Hak Asasi Manusia). Thus, no one can be subjected to coercion that can interfere his freedom to adopt or embrace a religion or belief of his choice. The main characteristic of modern constitutional state is the guarantee of human rights in its constitution. In the Constitution NKRI 1945 has set human rights and the rights of citizens in the form of guarantees freedom for each citizen to embrace religion and worship according to their religion or belief. A state guarantees the freedom of each citizen to adopt a religion or belief, but the state (the government) must regulate the freedom in implementing and practicing a religion or belief so that the government can respect, protect, enforce and promote Human Right (HAM) and conserving security, order, health or public morals. Speaking of human rights in Islam is not an historical product arising from human ideology, a concept that has a theological dimension and will be accountable to God. Freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief is part of the most important human rights, even have status as a right that should not be reduced and violated under any circumstances. On the other hand, religious freedom protects the phenomenon that can be controversial and dangerous for human existence, because religion and systems of ideological belief can be misused to trigger intolerance, discrimination, prejudice, hatred, and violence.[Setiap orang berhak atas kebebasan beragama atau kepercayaan yang menjadi salah satu bagian penting Hak Asasi Manusia. Dengan demikian, tidak ada yang bisa terkena paksaan yang bisa mengganggu kebebasannya untuk mengadopsi atau menganut agama atau kepercayaan pilihannya. Karakteristik utama negara konstitusional modern adalah jaminan hak asasi manusia dalam konstitusinya. Dalam Konstitusi NKRI 1945 telah menetapkan hak asasi manusia dan hak warga negara dalam bentuk jaminan kebebasan bagi setiap warga negara untuk merangkul agama dan ibadah sesuai agama atau kepercayaan mereka. Sebuah negara menjamin kebebasan setiap warga negara untuk mengadopsi agama atau kepercayaan, namun negara (pemerintah) harus mengatur kebebasan dalam melaksanakan dan mempraktikkan agama atau kepercayaan sehingga pemerintah dapat menghormati, melindungi, menerapkan dan mempromosikan Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM). Dan melestarikan keamanan, ketertiban, kesehatan atau moral publik. Berbicara tentang hak asasi manusia dalam Islam bukanlah produk historis yang muncul dari ideologi manusia, sebuah konsep yang memiliki dimensi teologis dan akan bertanggung jawab kepada Tuhan. Kebebasan berpikir, hati nurani, agama dan kepercayaan adalah bagian dari hak asasi manusia yang paling penting, bahkan memiliki status sebagai hak yang tidak boleh dikurangi dan dilanggar dalam kondisi apapun. Di sisi lain, kebebasan beragama melindungi fenomena yang bisa kontroversial dan berbahaya bagi eksistensi manusia, karena agama dan sistem kepercayaan ideologis dapat disalahgunakan untuk memicu intoleransi, diskriminasi, prasangka, kebencian, dan kekerasan.]

scholarly journals ANALISIS PEMBUBARAN ORGANISASI KEMASYARAKATAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF ASAS CONTARIUS ACTUS DALAM NEGARA HUKUM

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (02) ◽  
pp. 57-78
Author(s):  
Moh. Jatim
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Community Organization ◽  
Community Organizations ◽  
The State ◽  
State Law ◽  
Freedom Of Association ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government

Abstrak Pemerintah mempunyai hak mutlak di dalam membubarkan Organisasi kemasyarakatan setelah di sahkannya Peraturan pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang No 2 Tahun 2017 menjadi Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2017 Tentang Organisasi Kemasyarakatann, hal ini jelas tidak mencerminkan prinsip dari sebuah negara yang mengeklaim dirinya sebagai Negara yang menjunjung supremasi hukum, dimana ciri-ciri dari Negara hukum itu menjunjung tinggi tentang hak asasi manusia dan pembagian kekuasaan. Argumentasi penggunaan asas contarius Actus sebagai alasan mendesak untuk membentuk suatu Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang Undang yang kemudian di sahkan menjadi Undang Undang memberikan batasan terhadap kemerdekaan berserikat yang di jamin oleh Pasal 28 dan Pasal 28J Undang-Undang Dasar tahun 1945. Berdasarkan Undang Undang Dasar  Tahun 1945, sistem check and balances (pengawasan dan keseimbangan) sangat penting di tekankan di dalam pembagian kekuasaan yang jelas antara fungsi Eksekutif dan yudikatif. Artinya, di dalam pembubaran sebuah organisasi haruslah melibatkan pengadilan dengan cara melakukan penataan penyelesaian asas peradilan yang cepat, sederhana dan dengan biaya ringan sehingga proses penyelesaian sebuah masalah bisa di laksanakan secara singkat dan cepat. Kata Kunci : Organisasi kemasyarakatan, Negara Hukum, Kekuasaan   Abstract The government has an absolute right in disbanding the Community Organization after the enactment of the Government Regulation Replacement Law No. 2 of 2017 into Law No. 16 of 2017 on Community Organizations, this clearly does not reflect the principle of a country that claims itself as a State that upholds the supremacy of the law, where the characteristics of the State law upholds human rights and the division of power. The argument of the use of the principle of contarius Actus as an urgent reason to form a Government Regulation Replacement Law which is then authorized into law provides limits on the freedom of association guaranteed by Article 28 and Article 28J of the Constitution of 1945. Based on the 1945 Constitution, the system of check and balances is very important in the clear division of power between the Executive and judicial functions. That is, in the dissolution of an organization must involve the court by structuring the settlement of judicial principles quickly, simply and at a small cost so that the process of solving a problem can be carried out briefly and quickly. Keywords: Community Organization, State of Law, Power

scholarly journals Problematika Peraturan Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 tentang Organisasi Masyarakat

2019 ◽  
pp. 226-237
Author(s):  
Rezki Robiatul Aisyiah Ismail
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Social Organization ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Community Organization ◽  
Community Organizations ◽  
The State ◽  
Freedom Of Association ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

Indonesia is a democratic constitutional state set forth in article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia, as a legal state for running a state and protection of human rights under the law. One of them is in Article 28 E Paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia which states that everyone has the right to freedom of association, assembly, and expression. The regulation concerning the Organization of the Community is in fact set out in Law No. 17 of 2013 on Community Organizations. Community organization is an organization founded and formed by the community voluntarily based on the similarity of aspirations, wills, needs, interests, activities and objectives to participate in development in order to achieve the objectives of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia based on Pancasila. Community organizations may be in the form of two, incorporated and non-legal entities. The Government issued a Regulation in Lieu of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 Year 2017 on the amendment to Law No. 17 of 2013 on Social Organization and then with the Regulation of Lieu of the Law the government made a policy that the Government in this case gave authority to the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights Asasi Manusia dissolved social organization which contradict with principle of Pancasila one of them is Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia discussion Government Regulation of society organization still has weakness substantially. Government regulation in lieu of laws of community organizations in order to reinforce the principle of contrarius actus is not appropriate because it has actually attached to government officials without the need to be affirmed in the legislation.

scholarly journals Fiqh Pandemi: Tinjauan Kritis terhadap PP No. 21 Tahun 2020 tentang PSBB dengan Pendekatan Sadd al-Dhari’ah

AKADEMIKA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ja'far Shodiq ◽  
Muh. Mahrus Ali Ridho ◽  
Mufidul Abror
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Social Interaction ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Regional Level ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Corona Virus ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Government

Presiden Indonesia memulai mengadakan pembatasan interaksi sosial mulai dari tingkat dasar sampai regional untuk mencegah penyebaran virus Corona di bebrapa wilayah Indonesia. Virus Corona adalah virus yang membahayakan dan pembatasan ini sangat penting sekali apalagi di wilayah-wilayah yang masyarakatnya tidak bisa diatur dan tidak memungkinkan untuk mencegah meluasnya virus tersebut di wilayah-wilayah itu. Karena virus Corona telah memakan korban lebih dari seribu orang. Data korban ini tertanggal 28 Maret 2020. Pembahasan Ini dianggap sebagai bagian dari pembelajaran normatif yg konseptual. Sedangkan tema dari pembahasan ini adalah; Regulasi tentang Penerapan Pembatasan interaksi sosial. Sasaran dari pembelajaran ini adalah; 1. Pengetahuan tentang kaidah-kaidah hukum di Indonesia yang mengatur tentang pembatasan interaksi sosial mulai dari tingkat lokal sampai regional. 2.Pengetahuan tentang pembatasan interaksi sosial ditunjumau dari sisi pemutusan mata rantai virus. Sedangkan hasil dari pembahasan ini adalah; 1. Regulasi yang dipakai presiden untuk pembatasan interaksi sosial pada peraturan pemerintah nomor 21 tahun 2020. Seperti pada ayat 1 pasal 4 yang didalamnya mencantumkan larangan bepergian ke sekolahan untuk belajar dan larangan bepergian ke tempat kerja untuk bekerja yang hal ini termasuk bagian dari pembatasan terhadap hak-hak kemanusiaan, 2. Pembatasan ini dinilai  menjadi wasilah untuk menjaga nyawa masyarakat Indonesia namun di sisi lain mencabut pembatasan ini hukumnya wajib.The President of Indonesia began to implement social restrictions ranging from local to regional level to prevent the spread of the Corona virus in several parts of Indonesia. The Corona virus is a dangerous one and these restrictions are very important, especially in areas where the community cannot be controlled and it is not possible to prevent the spread of the virus in these areas. Moreover the Corona virus has killed more than a thousand people. The Corona deaths data is dated March 28, 2020. This study is considered as part of conceptual normative one. While the theme of this study is the Regulation on the implementation of social interaction restrictions. The objectives of this study are; 1. the understanding of legal principles in Indonesia that regulate the social interaction restrictions from local to regional levels. 2. the understanding of social interaction restrictions viewed from the breaking of the chains of infection. While the results of this study are; 1. The regulation used by the president to implement social interaction restrictions are the government regulation number 21, 2020. As in paragraph 1, article 4, which includes the prohibition on going to school and traveling to work which is part of the restrictions on human rights, 2. These restrictions are considered to be a means of protecting the lives of the Indonesian people but on the other hand lifting the restrictions is obligatory.

scholarly journals DIALEKTIKA PENGUNGKAPAN IDENTITAS MANTAN ANGGOTA HIZBUT TAHRIR INDONESIA (HTI) KOTA MATARAM

TASAMUH ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-60
Author(s):  
Muhammad Syaoki
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Community Organization ◽  
Community Organizations ◽  
The State ◽  
Civil Servants ◽  
Patterns Of Communication ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Impact

The President formally issued Perppu No / 02 / Year / 2017 on Community Organizations. Then the Ministry of Law and Human Rights officially freeze the Hizb ut-Tahrir Indonesia (HTI) community organization because it is considered against the Pancasila. The impact of the government also directly prohibits all activities related to HTI. Kemendagri forbids all Civil Servants (PNS) to become HTI members, otherwise, their status as civil servants will be revoked. Even had also circulated a list of names of HTI members who served as civil servants of the State (ASN). This study aims to see the patterns of communication made by HTI members of Mataram city after the publication of Perppu No / 02 / Tahun / 2017 and freezing of HTI SK by Kemenkumham. The results of this study indicate that the HTI of Mataram responded to the release of Perppu no / 02/2017 and HTI freezing in several ways, including no longer using HTI identity when conveying the idea of Khilafah, abolishing the name of HTI in weekly bulletins dispersed in mosques but still explore the idea of Khilafah.

scholarly journals AIR QUALITY MONITORING OF KALABAHI-ALOR’S SEAPORT-EAST OF NUSA TENGGARA

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-133
Author(s):  
Rikson Siburian ◽  
Minsyahril Bukit ◽  
Herlince Sihotang ◽  
Saur Lumban Raja ◽  
Minto Supeno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Air Quality ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
The Other ◽  
Quality Monitoring ◽  
Air Quality Monitoring ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
The People ◽  
The Government

Evaluation of environment of seaport is needed as well as our responsibility to nature sustainability. The Alor’s seaport belongs to Pelindo III. In order to know the air quality of Alor’s seaport, we did this study. Our aims are to know level quality of air at Alor’s seaport and compare to the government regulation. This study refers to Pararosaniline (SOx), Saltzman (NOx), Particle Calculation (dust) and decibel (noisy) methods. We used four locations, those are A-1 (Entrance gate of PELINDO (8013’09.12”S, 124031’07.21”E)); A-2 (In front of passengers terminal (8013’08.75”S, 124031’01.60”E)); A-3 (Exit  gate Kalabahi’s seaport (8013’08.2”S, 124031’00.87”E)) and A-4 (In front of port of the people (8011’09.12”S, 124031’07.21”E)). Results show that the averages level of SOx, NOx and dust of A-1, A-2 and A-3 are 103.01, 104.65 and 107.47 (µg/Nm3), 37.87, 30.62, and 39.73 (µg/Nm3), 56.64, 47.47 and 50.72 (µg/Nm), respectively. On the other hand, the level of noisy of A-1, A-2, A-3 and A-4 are 68.76, 65.69, 65.20 and 73.60 (dBA), respectively. Base on all of data, we conclude that the air quality of Alor’s seaport is still appropriate according to government regulation (PP. No. 4, 1999).

scholarly journals AN APPRAISAL OF EMPLOYEES WELFARE AND SOCIAL SECURITY MEASURES IN CENTRAL PUBLIC SECTOR ENTERPRISES

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 234-247
Author(s):  
Joyjit Sanyal ◽  
Sujit Sikidar
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Social Security ◽  
Labour Force ◽  
Well Being ◽  
The State ◽  
The Other ◽  
Security Measures ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Level Of Satisfaction ◽  
The Government

Labour plays a very important role in the industrial production of the country. The human resource managers are concerned with the management of people at work. It is necessary to secure the co-operation of labour force in order to increase the production and earn higher profits. The co-operation of labour force is possible only when they are fully satisfied with their employer and the working conditions on the job. In the past, industrialists and the employers believed that their only duty towards their employees was to pay them satisfactory wages and salaries. But in due course of time, in addition to providing monetary benefits, human treatment given to employees started to play a very important role in seeking their co-operation. Labour or employee welfare activities benefit not only the workers but also the management in the form of greater industrial efficiency. The welfare activities pay a good dividend in the long run, because they contribute a lot towards the health and efficiency of the workers and towards a high morale. On the other hand, social security has come up as a dynamic concept which is considered in all advanced countries of the world as an indispensable chapter of the national programme. Social security is that security which the society furnishes through appropriate organisation against certain risks or certain contingencies to which its members are exposed. These risks are essentially contingencies against which the individual cannot afford by his small means and by his ability or foresight alone. As the name stands for general well- being of the people it is the duty of the state to promote social security which may provide the citizens with benefits designed to prevent or cure disease, to support him when he is not able to earn and to restore him to gainful activity. The state as an employer has provided for certain measures for the welfare and social security of the labourers, who contribute towards the economic development of a country and in this regard, the government has to see towards the proper implementation of such measures to maintain a harmonious industrial relation on the one side and on the other hand towards the upliftment of the members of the society. Thus, there arise the vital needs for the detailed assessments of the measures so provided, its quality of implementation so far and the level of satisfaction of the same among the different class of employees. The present study acts as a working paper with an objective to gather the opinion of the organized workforce in the Central Public Sector Enterprises with regards to their acceptance and satisfaction level of the various ‘Employees welfare and Social Security’ measures by the employers. However, the present study is restricted to two enterprises only and is undertaken with the following objectives: To analyze the opinions of the employees in respect of the labour welfare measures & social security benefits. To analyze the level of satisfaction or otherwise of the workers in respect of social security measures.

scholarly journals Problem of Statelessness in Nepal

NUTA Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 64-69
Author(s):  
Rameshwor Upadhyay
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
The State ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
The Other ◽  
Universal Principle ◽  
Legal Obligations ◽  
The World ◽  
Women And Children ◽  
The Government ◽  
International Instruments

This paper highlighted Nepalese statelessness issue from Nationality perspective. Nationality is one of the major human rights concerns of the citizens. In fact, citizenship is one of the major fundamental rights guaranteed by the constitution. According to the universal principle related to the statelessness, no one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his or her nationality. In this connection, on one hand, this paper traced out the international legal obligations created by the conventions to the state parties in which state must bear the responsibility for making national laws to comply with the international instruments. On the other hand, this paper also appraised statelessness related lacunae and shortcomings seen in Municipal laws as well as gender discriminatory laws that has been supporting citizens to become statelessness. By virtue being a one of the modern democratic states in the world, it is the responsibility of the government to protect and promote human rights of the citizens including women and children. Finally, this paper suggests government to take necessary initiation to change and repeal the discriminatory provisions related to citizenship which are seen in the constitution and other statutory laws.

scholarly journals “PERAN PANCASILA PADA ERA GLOBALISASI” KAJIAN TERHADAP PANCASILA DAN FENOMENA LGBT (LESBIAN,GAY,BISEXUAL,TRANSGENDER) DI INDONESIA

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 126
Author(s):  
Wawan Setiawan ◽  
Yudhitiya Dyah Sukmadewi
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
The State ◽  
The Other ◽  
Religious Groups ◽  
Sexual Deviation ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
The People ◽  
Lgbt Community ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
Lgbt People

LGBT phenomenon into a "hot issue" in the international and national levels. LGBT phenomenon in Indonesia would result in the pros and cons of the community. Various groups of people, mainly from religious groups opposed to the existence of the phenomenon. On the other hand, there are also groups that support the LGBT community in Indonesia, the main actors and human rights activists (Human Rights). Most LGBT people found contrary to the noble values of Pancasila, but on the other hand assumes that actors LGBT community is not sexual deviation, and shall have the rights and equality. It is thus necessary to do a study to determine the response of the people of Indonesia respond to the phenomenon of LGBT specifically in this case the younger generation, as well as to determine whether or not the phenomenon of LGBT contrary to the basic values of Pancasila as the State Indonesia.

scholarly journals REALITAS PEMBERLAKUAN UAN/UN

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Darmaningtyas Darmaningtyas
Keyword(s):  
Educational System ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
School Quality ◽  
Social Reality ◽  
The Other ◽  
National Education ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Educational Decentralization ◽  
The Government ◽  
Education Standard

AbstractThough it is controversial, implementing UN as a graduation standard for any students has continued so far. Juridical bases are UU No. 20/2003 regarding National Educational System and Government Regulation (PP) No. 19/2005 regarding National Education Standard. The fact is that UN encourages students to leaarn more actively, teachers to teach better, principals to improve school quality, and parents to focus more on making their children study more enthusiastically. However, still there are parties nit agreeing with the government act. The rejection of UN is based on different interpretations on the existence of Law No. 19/2005, educational decentralization principle, different paradigm in understanding of national education objective, social reality in community, and the educational function. On the other hand, the government should fulfill minimal service standard before they implement educational nationalization.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document