scholarly journals Association between Interleukin-1 Polymorphisms and Susceptibility to Dental Peri-Implant Disease: A Meta-Analysis

Pathogens ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1600
Author(s):  
Hady Mohammadi ◽  
Mehrnoush Momeni Roochi ◽  
Masoud Sadeghi ◽  
Ata Garajei ◽  
Hosein Heidar ◽  
...  

Background and objective: Interleukins (ILs), as important biochemical mediators, control the host response to inflammation and are associated with bone resorption. In the present meta-analysis, we investigated the association between IL−1 polymorphisms and susceptibility to dental peri-implant disease (PID). Materials and methods: We searched Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and PubMed/Medline databases for studies published until 9 September2021, without any restrictions. We calculated the crude OR and 95% confidence intervals (CI) to estimate the associations between IL−1 polymorphisms and PID risk in the five genetic models. We further performed the subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, meta-regression, trial sequential analysis, and calculated the publication bias. Results: Out of 212 retrieved records, sixteen articles were used in the meta-analysis. There was no association between IL−1A (–889), IL−1B (−511), IL−1B (+3953), and IL−1RN (VNTR) polymorphisms and the risk of dental PIDs, but there was an increased risk of IL−1B (+3954) in the patients with PIDs. In addition, an association of the composite genotype of IL−1A (−889)/IL−1B (+3953) was observed with the risk of PIDs, but not for the composite genotype of IL−1A (−889)/IL−1B (+3954). The publication year, the ethnicity, sample size, and the outcome were significantly influenced pooled estimates of some genetic models. Trial sequential analysis showed the lack of sufficient sample sizes in the studies. Conclusions: Among IL−1 polymorphisms evaluated in the meta-analysis, the composite genotype of IL−1A (−889)/IL−1B (+3953) and IL−1B (+3954) were the only polymorphisms associated with the risk of PID. The T allele and CT genotype of IL−1B (+3954) polymorphism were also associated with an elevated risk of PID.

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (12) ◽  
pp. 3121-3142
Author(s):  
Chen Wang ◽  
Xiao Zhou ◽  
Huai Liu ◽  
Shuhui Huang

Abstract Purpose Some data suggest an association between the single nucleotide polymorphisms AGT T704C, ACE I/D, and AT1R A1166C and preeclampsia, but overall, the data are conflicting; the aim of our study was to discover a more stable and reliable association between these polymorphisms and PE risk. Methods A comprehensive literature search for this meta-analysis was conducted. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the strength, and heterogeneity test was conducted. Trial sequential analysis was also performed. Results A total of forty studies were finally included in our meta-analysis. The AGT T704C polymorphism was associated with PE risk in three genetic models (dominant OR = 1.33, 95%CI = 1.12–1.59; heterozygote OR = 1.26, 95%CI = 1.05–1.52; homozygote OR = 1.44, 95%CI = 1.14–1.83). No heterogeneity was observed in the three genetic models for the ACE I/D polymorphism. For subgroup analysis by geography, no significant association was detected. Significant associations were observed in mixed race, early-onset, late-onset, and more than 200 subgroups for the AT1R A1166C polymorphism; however, only one study was analyzed in these subgroups. Conclusions Our results indicated the AGT T704C and ACE I/D polymorphisms were associated with an increased risk of PE. Increased risks were also observed for the two polymorphisms in subgroups including Asians, Europeans, Caucasoid, and Mongoloid. Moreover, an increased PE risk with the ACE I/D polymorphism in the severe PE population was also detected. Regarding the AT1R A1166C polymorphism, weak associations were observed, but further studies are required.


2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (7) ◽  
pp. 2513-2524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Xu ◽  
Qian Wang ◽  
Yan Huang ◽  
Ling Wu ◽  
Qi Liu ◽  
...  

Objective This meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed to determine whether low-dose corticosteroids (LDCs) can improve survival or shock reversal from septic shock in adults. Methods A literature search was performed using several databases (Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Chinese Biological Medical Database) until 23 October 2017. The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO. Results Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 1182) were included. LDC intervention improved 7-day shock reversal compared with the control group (relative risk, 1.36; TSA-adjusted 95% confidence interval, 1.20–1.54). LDCs had no statistically significant effects on gastrointestinal bleeding or superinfection. LDCs did not reduce 28-day mortality from septic shock (relative risk, 0.96; TSA-adjusted 95% confidence interval, 0.74–1.24). The TSA indicated that RCTs of about 3000 patients would be needed to draw definitive conclusions; similar results were obtained in a subgroup analysis of nonresponders. Conclusions LDCs improve 7-day shock reversal. However, whether LDCs improve 28-day survival from septic shock in adults remains unclear. The results of well-designed larger RCTs are needed.


BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. e018544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoqin Wang ◽  
Liang Yao ◽  
Long Ge ◽  
Lun Li ◽  
Fuxiang Liang ◽  
...  

IntroductionPostoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is the most common complication following cardiac surgery, and randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews have been conducted to compare and evaluate different pharmacological interventions for preventing POAF. This study aimed to explore the effect of different pharmacological interventions for prophylaxis against POAF after cardiac surgery using network meta-analysis (NMA).Methods and analysisA systematic search will be performed in PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library to identify RCTs, systematic reviews, meta-analyses or NMA of different pharmacological interventions for POAF. We will evaluate the risk of bias of the included RCTs according to the Cochrane Handbook V.5.1.0, and use GRADE to assess the quality of evidence. Standard pairwise meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis and Bayesian network meta-analysis will be used to compare the efficacy of different pharmacological interventions.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval and patient consent are not required as this study is a meta-analysis based on published studies. The results of this NMA and trial sequential analysis will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.Protocol registration numberCRD42017067492.


2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (10) ◽  
pp. 030006052110532
Author(s):  
Ping Chen ◽  
Yuhao Li ◽  
Liangliang Li ◽  
Guixin Zhang ◽  
Feng Zhang ◽  
...  

Objective This meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between the interleukin (IL)-17A rs2275913 polymorphism and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) susceptibility. Methods Eligible studies were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. The fixed- or random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) on the basis of heterogeneity. Results Overall, 11 studies containing 4019 RA patients and 4137 controls were included in this meta-analysis. The results suggested a significant association between the IL-17A rs2275913 polymorphism and RA susceptibility in the overall population (allelic model A vs. G: OR = 0.89, 95%CI: 0.83–0.95; heterozygote model GA vs. GG: OR = 0.87, 95%CI: 0.78–0.96; homozygote model AA vs. GG: OR = 0.82, 95%CI: 0.71–0.96; dominant model GA + AA vs. GG: OR = 0.86, 95%CI: 0.78–0.94). In the subgroup analyses, the IL-17A rs2275913 polymorphism was significantly associated with RA risk in Europeans (allelic model A vs. G: OR = 0.87, 95%CI: 0.78–0.97; heterozygote model GA vs. GG: OR = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.68–0.93; dominant model GA + AA vs. GG: OR = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.68–0.92), but not in Africans or Americans. Conclusion This study suggests that the IL-17A rs2275913 polymorphism is significantly associated with RA susceptibility in Europeans. INPLASY registration number: INPLASY202170056.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zixin Cai ◽  
Yan Yang ◽  
Jingjing Zhang

Abstract Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to global research to predict those who are at greatest risk of developing severe disease and mortality. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the associations between obesity and the severity of and mortality due to COVID-19. Methods We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases for studies evaluating the associations of obesity with COVID-19. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random- or fixed-effects models. Meta-regression analyses were conducted to estimate regression coefficients. Results Forty-six studies involving 625,153 patients were included. Compared with nonobese patients, obese patients had a significantly increased risk of infection. (OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.53–4.87; I2 = 96.8%), hospitalization (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.55–1.92; I2 = 47.4%), clinically severe disease (OR 3.81, 95% CI 1.97–7.35; I2 = 57.4%), mechanical ventilation (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.42–1.94; I2 = 41.3%), intensive care unit (ICU) admission (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.55–3.27; I2 = 71.5%), and mortality (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.29–2.01; I2 = 83.1%). Conclusion Patients with obesity may have a greater risk of infection, hospitalization, clinically severe disease, mechanical ventilation, ICU admission, and mortality due to COVID-19. Therefore, it is important to increase awareness of these associations with obesity in COVID-19 patients.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roohollah Sharifi ◽  
Sajjad Jahedi ◽  
Hamid Reza Mozaffari ◽  
Mohammad Moslem Imani ◽  
Masuod Sadeghi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background This meta-analysis evaluated the association of LTF, ENAM, and AMELX polymorphisms with dental caries susceptibility.Methods We searched the Scopus, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases to retrieve articles published by October 2019. Review Manager 5.3 software was used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The results of publication bias tests were retrieved by Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 2.0 software.Results A total of 150 relevant records were identified; out of which, 16 were entered into the analysis (4 studies assessed LTF, 11 ENAM, and 11 AMELX polymorphisms). Of all polymorphisms, there was a significant association only between ENAM rs3796704 polymorphism and dental caries susceptibility. Both ENAM rs3796704 and AMELX rs17878486 polymorphisms had a significant association with dental caries risk in the Caucasian ethnicity and the studies including caries-free control group.Conclusions The results of this meta-analysis showed that the G allele and the GG genotype of ENAM rs3796704 were associated with an increased risk of caries in the case group compared with the control group. But there was no association between LTF rs1126478, ENAM (rs1264848 and rs3796703), and AMELX (rs946252, rs17878486, and rs2106416) polymorphisms and dental caries susceptibility.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (21) ◽  
pp. 4895
Author(s):  
Hou-Ren Tsai ◽  
Tai-Li Chen ◽  
Chun-Yu Chang ◽  
Huei-Kai Huang ◽  
Yuan-Chieh Lee

Evidence regarding the effect of a face-down posture (FDP) for large idiopathic macular hole (IMH) is inconsistent. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether a postoperative FDP is required for the treatment of large IMH. Eligible randomized controlled trials published before September 2021 were retrieved from the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. The efficacy outcome was the IMH closure rate and the visual acuity improvement rate. A meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model. The “Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation” approach was implemented, and the numbers needed-to-treat (NNTs) were calculated. Seven studies comprising 640 patients were included. We performed a predefined subgroup analysis of IMH size using a cut-off point of 400 µm. Compared with non-FDP, a significant effect of FDP was found in the IMH > 400 µm group (OR = 3.34; 95% CI = 1.57–7.14; trial sequential analysis-adjusted CI = 1.20–11.58; NNTs = 7.9). After stratifying by the posturing periods, the beneficial effect of FDP lasting at least five days, but not three days was observed for large IMH. Maintaining a FDP for at least five days postoperatively is an effective strategy (certainty of evidence: “moderate”) for treating large IMH.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daojing Ying ◽  
Mengjie Jiang ◽  
Liping Rong ◽  
Hongjie Zhuang ◽  
Lizhi Chen ◽  
...  

Background: Studies have identified that MIF -173 G>C gene polymorphism is associated with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) susceptibility and steroid resistance, but the results remain inconclusive.Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for relevant studies published before 31 March 2021. Pooled data were reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Noteworthiness of significant OR was estimated by the false positive report probability (FPRP) test. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used to control type I and type II errors.Results: We selected seven case-control studies that included 1,026 INS children (362 were steroid-resistant NS and 564 were steroid-sensitive NS) and 870 controls. The results showed that MIF -173 G>C polymorphism was significantly associated with INS susceptibility in allelic, heterozygous and dominant genetic models (C vs. G: OR = 1.325, 95% CI: 1.011-1.738; GC vs. GG: OR = 1.540, 95% CI: 1.249-1.899; CC + GC vs. GG: OR = 1.507, 95% CI: 1.231-1.845), and FPRP test and TSA indicated that the associations were true in heterozygous and dominant models. The pooled results also revealed that MIF -173 G>C polymorphism was significantly associated with steroid resistance in allelic, homozygous and recessive models (C vs. G: OR = 1.707, 95% CI: 1.013-2.876; CC vs. GG: OR = 4.789, 95% CI: 2.109-10.877; CC vs. GC + GG: OR = 4.188, 95% CI: 1.831-9.578), but FPRP test indicated that all these associations were not noteworthy. Furthermore, TSA revealed that the non-significant associations between MIF -173 G>C polymorphism and steroid resistance in heterozygous and dominant models were potential false negative.Conclusions: This meta-analysis could draw a firm conclusion that MIF -173 G>C polymorphism was significantly associated with increased INS risk in heterozygous and dominant genetic models. MIF -173 G>C polymorphism was not likely to affect steroid responsiveness, but more studies were needed to confirm.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Kwasi Korang ◽  
Sanam Safi ◽  
Christian Gluud ◽  
Ulrik Lausten-Thomsen ◽  
Janus C. Jakobsen

Abstract Background Sepsis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among neonates and infants. Antibiotics are a central part of the first line treatment for sepsis in neonatal intensive care units worldwide. However, the evidence on the clinical effects of the commonly used antibiotic regimens for sepsis in neonates remains scarce. This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy and harms of antibiotic regimens for neonatal sepsis. Methods Electronic searches will be conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, ZETOC and clinical trial registries (clinicaltrials.gov and ISRCTN). We will include randomised controlled trials of different antibiotic regimens for sepsis of neonates and infants. Eligible interventions will be any antibiotic regimen. Two reviewers will independently screen, select, and extract data. The methodological quality of individual studies will be appraised following Cochrane methodology. Primary outcomes will be ‘all-cause mortality’ and ‘serious adverse events’. Secondary outcomes will be ‘need for respiratory support’, ‘need for circulatory support’, ‘neurodevelopmental impairment’, ototoxicity, nephrotoxicity and necrotizing enterocolitis. We plan to perform a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. Discussion This is the study protocol for a systematic review on the effects of different antibiotic regimens for neonatal sepsis. The results of this systematic review intent to adequately inform stakeholders or health care professionals in the field of neonatal sepsis, and to aid appropriate development of treatment guidelines. Systematic review registration PROSPERO reference number: CRD42019134300.


2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (9) ◽  
pp. 4069-4082 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Zhang ◽  
Xiaohan Wang ◽  
Shuai Miao ◽  
Mengzhu Shi ◽  
Guanglei Wang ◽  
...  

Objective To compare short-axis versus long-axis plane for ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein puncture. Methods PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and CNKI databases were searched for randomized controlled trials, published to 1 June 2019, that compared short- versus long-axis plane in ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein puncture. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan software, version 5.3. Statistical results are presented as risk ratio (RR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) for dichotomous data and standard mean difference (SMD) (95% CI) for continuous data. Results Ten studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Analyses of pooled results showed no statistically significant differences in arterial puncture incidence between the two planes (RR 0.73 [95% CI 0.38, 1.39]). First-pass success rate (RR 1.08 [95% CI 0.95, 1.22]), total success rate (RR 1.00 [95% CI 0.99, 1.02]) and number of attempts required (SMD –0.09 [95% CI –0.37, 0.18]) were also similar between the two approaches. Trial sequential analysis indicated that the available evidence was insufficient to detect potential differences between the two techniques. Conclusions There is insufficient data for an evidence-based choice of either short- or long-axis plane in ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein puncture.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document